Linus Torvalds | 1da177e | 2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | 27-Dec-2002 |
| 2 | |
| 3 | The EHCI driver is used to talk to high speed USB 2.0 devices using |
| 4 | USB 2.0-capable host controller hardware. The USB 2.0 standard is |
| 5 | compatible with the USB 1.1 standard. It defines three transfer speeds: |
| 6 | |
| 7 | - "High Speed" 480 Mbit/sec (60 MByte/sec) |
| 8 | - "Full Speed" 12 Mbit/sec (1.5 MByte/sec) |
| 9 | - "Low Speed" 1.5 Mbit/sec |
| 10 | |
| 11 | USB 1.1 only addressed full speed and low speed. High speed devices |
Andrea Gelmini | 254217d | 2010-05-23 21:56:41 +0200 | [diff] [blame] | 12 | can be used on USB 1.1 systems, but they slow down to USB 1.1 speeds. |
Linus Torvalds | 1da177e | 2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 13 | |
| 14 | USB 1.1 devices may also be used on USB 2.0 systems. When plugged |
| 15 | into an EHCI controller, they are given to a USB 1.1 "companion" |
| 16 | controller, which is a OHCI or UHCI controller as normally used with |
| 17 | such devices. When USB 1.1 devices plug into USB 2.0 hubs, they |
| 18 | interact with the EHCI controller through a "Transaction Translator" |
| 19 | (TT) in the hub, which turns low or full speed transactions into |
| 20 | high speed "split transactions" that don't waste transfer bandwidth. |
| 21 | |
| 22 | At this writing, this driver has been seen to work with implementations |
| 23 | of EHCI from (in alphabetical order): Intel, NEC, Philips, and VIA. |
| 24 | Other EHCI implementations are becoming available from other vendors; |
| 25 | you should expect this driver to work with them too. |
| 26 | |
| 27 | While usb-storage devices have been available since mid-2001 (working |
| 28 | quite speedily on the 2.4 version of this driver), hubs have only |
| 29 | been available since late 2001, and other kinds of high speed devices |
| 30 | appear to be on hold until more systems come with USB 2.0 built-in. |
| 31 | Such new systems have been available since early 2002, and became much |
| 32 | more typical in the second half of 2002. |
| 33 | |
| 34 | Note that USB 2.0 support involves more than just EHCI. It requires |
| 35 | other changes to the Linux-USB core APIs, including the hub driver, |
| 36 | but those changes haven't needed to really change the basic "usbcore" |
| 37 | APIs exposed to USB device drivers. |
| 38 | |
| 39 | - David Brownell |
| 40 | <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net> |
| 41 | |
| 42 | |
| 43 | FUNCTIONALITY |
| 44 | |
| 45 | This driver is regularly tested on x86 hardware, and has also been |
| 46 | used on PPC hardware so big/little endianness issues should be gone. |
| 47 | It's believed to do all the right PCI magic so that I/O works even on |
| 48 | systems with interesting DMA mapping issues. |
| 49 | |
| 50 | Transfer Types |
| 51 | |
| 52 | At this writing the driver should comfortably handle all control, bulk, |
| 53 | and interrupt transfers, including requests to USB 1.1 devices through |
| 54 | transaction translators (TTs) in USB 2.0 hubs. But you may find bugs. |
| 55 | |
| 56 | High Speed Isochronous (ISO) transfer support is also functional, but |
| 57 | at this writing no Linux drivers have been using that support. |
| 58 | |
| 59 | Full Speed Isochronous transfer support, through transaction translators, |
| 60 | is not yet available. Note that split transaction support for ISO |
| 61 | transfers can't share much code with the code for high speed ISO transfers, |
| 62 | since EHCI represents these with a different data structure. So for now, |
| 63 | most USB audio and video devices can't be connected to high speed buses. |
| 64 | |
| 65 | Driver Behavior |
| 66 | |
| 67 | Transfers of all types can be queued. This means that control transfers |
| 68 | from a driver on one interface (or through usbfs) won't interfere with |
| 69 | ones from another driver, and that interrupt transfers can use periods |
| 70 | of one frame without risking data loss due to interrupt processing costs. |
| 71 | |
| 72 | The EHCI root hub code hands off USB 1.1 devices to its companion |
| 73 | controller. This driver doesn't need to know anything about those |
| 74 | drivers; a OHCI or UHCI driver that works already doesn't need to change |
| 75 | just because the EHCI driver is also present. |
| 76 | |
| 77 | There are some issues with power management; suspend/resume doesn't |
| 78 | behave quite right at the moment. |
| 79 | |
| 80 | Also, some shortcuts have been taken with the scheduling periodic |
| 81 | transactions (interrupt and isochronous transfers). These place some |
| 82 | limits on the number of periodic transactions that can be scheduled, |
| 83 | and prevent use of polling intervals of less than one frame. |
| 84 | |
| 85 | |
| 86 | USE BY |
| 87 | |
| 88 | Assuming you have an EHCI controller (on a PCI card or motherboard) |
| 89 | and have compiled this driver as a module, load this like: |
| 90 | |
| 91 | # modprobe ehci-hcd |
| 92 | |
| 93 | and remove it by: |
| 94 | |
| 95 | # rmmod ehci-hcd |
| 96 | |
| 97 | You should also have a driver for a "companion controller", such as |
| 98 | "ohci-hcd" or "uhci-hcd". In case of any trouble with the EHCI driver, |
| 99 | remove its module and then the driver for that companion controller will |
| 100 | take over (at lower speed) all the devices that were previously handled |
| 101 | by the EHCI driver. |
| 102 | |
| 103 | Module parameters (pass to "modprobe") include: |
| 104 | |
| 105 | log2_irq_thresh (default 0): |
| 106 | Log2 of default interrupt delay, in microframes. The default |
| 107 | value is 0, indicating 1 microframe (125 usec). Maximum value |
| 108 | is 6, indicating 2^6 = 64 microframes. This controls how often |
| 109 | the EHCI controller can issue interrupts. |
| 110 | |
| 111 | If you're using this driver on a 2.5 kernel, and you've enabled USB |
| 112 | debugging support, you'll see three files in the "sysfs" directory for |
| 113 | any EHCI controller: |
| 114 | |
| 115 | "async" dumps the asynchronous schedule, used for control |
| 116 | and bulk transfers. Shows each active qh and the qtds |
| 117 | pending, usually one qtd per urb. (Look at it with |
| 118 | usb-storage doing disk I/O; watch the request queues!) |
| 119 | "periodic" dumps the periodic schedule, used for interrupt |
| 120 | and isochronous transfers. Doesn't show qtds. |
| 121 | "registers" show controller register state, and |
| 122 | |
| 123 | The contents of those files can help identify driver problems. |
| 124 | |
| 125 | |
| 126 | Device drivers shouldn't care whether they're running over EHCI or not, |
| 127 | but they may want to check for "usb_device->speed == USB_SPEED_HIGH". |
| 128 | High speed devices can do things that full speed (or low speed) ones |
| 129 | can't, such as "high bandwidth" periodic (interrupt or ISO) transfers. |
| 130 | Also, some values in device descriptors (such as polling intervals for |
| 131 | periodic transfers) use different encodings when operating at high speed. |
| 132 | |
| 133 | However, do make a point of testing device drivers through USB 2.0 hubs. |
| 134 | Those hubs report some failures, such as disconnections, differently when |
| 135 | transaction translators are in use; some drivers have been seen to behave |
| 136 | badly when they see different faults than OHCI or UHCI report. |
| 137 | |
| 138 | |
| 139 | PERFORMANCE |
| 140 | |
| 141 | USB 2.0 throughput is gated by two main factors: how fast the host |
| 142 | controller can process requests, and how fast devices can respond to |
| 143 | them. The 480 Mbit/sec "raw transfer rate" is obeyed by all devices, |
| 144 | but aggregate throughput is also affected by issues like delays between |
| 145 | individual high speed packets, driver intelligence, and of course the |
| 146 | overall system load. Latency is also a performance concern. |
| 147 | |
| 148 | Bulk transfers are most often used where throughput is an issue. It's |
| 149 | good to keep in mind that bulk transfers are always in 512 byte packets, |
| 150 | and at most 13 of those fit into one USB 2.0 microframe. Eight USB 2.0 |
| 151 | microframes fit in a USB 1.1 frame; a microframe is 1 msec/8 = 125 usec. |
| 152 | |
| 153 | So more than 50 MByte/sec is available for bulk transfers, when both |
| 154 | hardware and device driver software allow it. Periodic transfer modes |
| 155 | (isochronous and interrupt) allow the larger packet sizes which let you |
| 156 | approach the quoted 480 MBit/sec transfer rate. |
| 157 | |
| 158 | Hardware Performance |
| 159 | |
| 160 | At this writing, individual USB 2.0 devices tend to max out at around |
| 161 | 20 MByte/sec transfer rates. This is of course subject to change; |
| 162 | and some devices now go faster, while others go slower. |
| 163 | |
| 164 | The first NEC implementation of EHCI seems to have a hardware bottleneck |
| 165 | at around 28 MByte/sec aggregate transfer rate. While this is clearly |
| 166 | enough for a single device at 20 MByte/sec, putting three such devices |
| 167 | onto one bus does not get you 60 MByte/sec. The issue appears to be |
| 168 | that the controller hardware won't do concurrent USB and PCI access, |
| 169 | so that it's only trying six (or maybe seven) USB transactions each |
| 170 | microframe rather than thirteen. (Seems like a reasonable trade off |
| 171 | for a product that beat all the others to market by over a year!) |
| 172 | |
| 173 | It's expected that newer implementations will better this, throwing |
| 174 | more silicon real estate at the problem so that new motherboard chip |
| 175 | sets will get closer to that 60 MByte/sec target. That includes an |
| 176 | updated implementation from NEC, as well as other vendors' silicon. |
| 177 | |
| 178 | There's a minimum latency of one microframe (125 usec) for the host |
| 179 | to receive interrupts from the EHCI controller indicating completion |
| 180 | of requests. That latency is tunable; there's a module option. By |
| 181 | default ehci-hcd driver uses the minimum latency, which means that if |
| 182 | you issue a control or bulk request you can often expect to learn that |
| 183 | it completed in less than 250 usec (depending on transfer size). |
| 184 | |
| 185 | Software Performance |
| 186 | |
| 187 | To get even 20 MByte/sec transfer rates, Linux-USB device drivers will |
| 188 | need to keep the EHCI queue full. That means issuing large requests, |
| 189 | or using bulk queuing if a series of small requests needs to be issued. |
| 190 | When drivers don't do that, their performance results will show it. |
| 191 | |
| 192 | In typical situations, a usb_bulk_msg() loop writing out 4 KB chunks is |
| 193 | going to waste more than half the USB 2.0 bandwidth. Delays between the |
| 194 | I/O completion and the driver issuing the next request will take longer |
| 195 | than the I/O. If that same loop used 16 KB chunks, it'd be better; a |
| 196 | sequence of 128 KB chunks would waste a lot less. |
| 197 | |
| 198 | But rather than depending on such large I/O buffers to make synchronous |
| 199 | I/O be efficient, it's better to just queue up several (bulk) requests |
| 200 | to the HC, and wait for them all to complete (or be canceled on error). |
| 201 | Such URB queuing should work with all the USB 1.1 HC drivers too. |
| 202 | |
| 203 | In the Linux 2.5 kernels, new usb_sg_*() api calls have been defined; they |
| 204 | queue all the buffers from a scatterlist. They also use scatterlist DMA |
| 205 | mapping (which might apply an IOMMU) and IRQ reduction, all of which will |
| 206 | help make high speed transfers run as fast as they can. |
| 207 | |
| 208 | |
| 209 | TBD: Interrupt and ISO transfer performance issues. Those periodic |
| 210 | transfers are fully scheduled, so the main issue is likely to be how |
| 211 | to trigger "high bandwidth" modes. |
| 212 | |
Kirill Smelkov | cc62a7e | 2011-07-03 20:36:57 +0400 | [diff] [blame^] | 213 | TBD: More than standard 80% periodic bandwidth allocation is possible |
| 214 | through sysfs uframe_periodic_max parameter. Describe that. |