blob: d35c852f1617c5eae252616e0c4b1558eaecb95c [file] [log] [blame]
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001/*
Uwe Zeisbergerf30c2262006-10-03 23:01:26 +02002 * mm/page-writeback.c
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07003 *
4 * Copyright (C) 2002, Linus Torvalds.
Peter Zijlstra04fbfdc2007-10-16 23:25:50 -07005 * Copyright (C) 2007 Red Hat, Inc., Peter Zijlstra <pzijlstr@redhat.com>
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07006 *
7 * Contains functions related to writing back dirty pages at the
8 * address_space level.
9 *
Francois Camie1f8e872008-10-15 22:01:59 -070010 * 10Apr2002 Andrew Morton
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -070011 * Initial version
12 */
13
14#include <linux/kernel.h>
Paul Gortmakerb95f1b312011-10-16 02:01:52 -040015#include <linux/export.h>
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -070016#include <linux/spinlock.h>
17#include <linux/fs.h>
18#include <linux/mm.h>
19#include <linux/swap.h>
20#include <linux/slab.h>
21#include <linux/pagemap.h>
22#include <linux/writeback.h>
23#include <linux/init.h>
24#include <linux/backing-dev.h>
Andrew Morton55e829a2006-12-10 02:19:27 -080025#include <linux/task_io_accounting_ops.h>
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -070026#include <linux/blkdev.h>
27#include <linux/mpage.h>
Peter Zijlstrad08b3852006-09-25 23:30:57 -070028#include <linux/rmap.h>
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -070029#include <linux/percpu.h>
30#include <linux/notifier.h>
31#include <linux/smp.h>
32#include <linux/sysctl.h>
33#include <linux/cpu.h>
34#include <linux/syscalls.h>
Al Viroff01bb42011-09-16 02:31:11 -040035#include <linux/buffer_head.h> /* __set_page_dirty_buffers */
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +010036#include <linux/pagevec.h>
Lisa Due0935212013-09-11 14:22:36 -070037#include <linux/mm_inline.h>
Dave Chinner028c2dd2010-07-07 13:24:07 +100038#include <trace/events/writeback.h>
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -070039
Lisa Due0935212013-09-11 14:22:36 -070040#include "internal.h"
41
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -070042/*
Wu Fengguangffd1f602011-06-19 22:18:42 -060043 * Sleep at most 200ms at a time in balance_dirty_pages().
44 */
45#define MAX_PAUSE max(HZ/5, 1)
46
47/*
Wu Fengguang5b9b3572011-12-06 13:17:17 -060048 * Try to keep balance_dirty_pages() call intervals higher than this many pages
49 * by raising pause time to max_pause when falls below it.
50 */
51#define DIRTY_POLL_THRESH (128 >> (PAGE_SHIFT - 10))
52
53/*
Wu Fengguange98be2d2010-08-29 11:22:30 -060054 * Estimate write bandwidth at 200ms intervals.
55 */
56#define BANDWIDTH_INTERVAL max(HZ/5, 1)
57
Wu Fengguang6c14ae12011-03-02 16:04:18 -060058#define RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT 10
59
Wu Fengguange98be2d2010-08-29 11:22:30 -060060/*
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -070061 * After a CPU has dirtied this many pages, balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited
62 * will look to see if it needs to force writeback or throttling.
63 */
64static long ratelimit_pages = 32;
65
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -070066/* The following parameters are exported via /proc/sys/vm */
67
68/*
Jens Axboe5b0830c2009-09-23 19:37:09 +020069 * Start background writeback (via writeback threads) at this percentage
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -070070 */
Wu Fengguang1b5e62b2009-03-23 08:57:38 +080071int dirty_background_ratio = 10;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -070072
73/*
David Rientjes2da02992009-01-06 14:39:31 -080074 * dirty_background_bytes starts at 0 (disabled) so that it is a function of
75 * dirty_background_ratio * the amount of dirtyable memory
76 */
77unsigned long dirty_background_bytes;
78
79/*
Bron Gondwana195cf452008-02-04 22:29:20 -080080 * free highmem will not be subtracted from the total free memory
81 * for calculating free ratios if vm_highmem_is_dirtyable is true
82 */
83int vm_highmem_is_dirtyable;
84
85/*
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -070086 * The generator of dirty data starts writeback at this percentage
87 */
Wu Fengguang1b5e62b2009-03-23 08:57:38 +080088int vm_dirty_ratio = 20;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -070089
90/*
David Rientjes2da02992009-01-06 14:39:31 -080091 * vm_dirty_bytes starts at 0 (disabled) so that it is a function of
92 * vm_dirty_ratio * the amount of dirtyable memory
93 */
94unsigned long vm_dirty_bytes;
95
96/*
Alexey Dobriyan704503d2009-03-31 15:23:18 -070097 * The interval between `kupdate'-style writebacks
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -070098 */
Toshiyuki Okajima22ef37e2009-05-16 22:56:28 -070099unsigned int dirty_writeback_interval = 5 * 100; /* centiseconds */
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700100
Artem Bityutskiy91913a22012-03-21 22:33:00 -0400101EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dirty_writeback_interval);
102
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700103/*
Alexey Dobriyan704503d2009-03-31 15:23:18 -0700104 * The longest time for which data is allowed to remain dirty
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700105 */
Toshiyuki Okajima22ef37e2009-05-16 22:56:28 -0700106unsigned int dirty_expire_interval = 30 * 100; /* centiseconds */
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700107
108/*
109 * Flag that makes the machine dump writes/reads and block dirtyings.
110 */
111int block_dump;
112
113/*
Bart Samweled5b43f2006-03-24 03:15:49 -0800114 * Flag that puts the machine in "laptop mode". Doubles as a timeout in jiffies:
115 * a full sync is triggered after this time elapses without any disk activity.
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700116 */
117int laptop_mode;
118
119EXPORT_SYMBOL(laptop_mode);
120
121/* End of sysctl-exported parameters */
122
Wu Fengguangc42843f2011-03-02 15:54:09 -0600123unsigned long global_dirty_limit;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700124
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700125/*
Peter Zijlstra04fbfdc2007-10-16 23:25:50 -0700126 * Scale the writeback cache size proportional to the relative writeout speeds.
127 *
128 * We do this by keeping a floating proportion between BDIs, based on page
129 * writeback completions [end_page_writeback()]. Those devices that write out
130 * pages fastest will get the larger share, while the slower will get a smaller
131 * share.
132 *
133 * We use page writeout completions because we are interested in getting rid of
134 * dirty pages. Having them written out is the primary goal.
135 *
136 * We introduce a concept of time, a period over which we measure these events,
137 * because demand can/will vary over time. The length of this period itself is
138 * measured in page writeback completions.
139 *
140 */
141static struct prop_descriptor vm_completions;
142
Peter Zijlstra04fbfdc2007-10-16 23:25:50 -0700143/*
Johannes Weiner1edf2232012-01-10 15:06:57 -0800144 * Work out the current dirty-memory clamping and background writeout
145 * thresholds.
146 *
147 * The main aim here is to lower them aggressively if there is a lot of mapped
148 * memory around. To avoid stressing page reclaim with lots of unreclaimable
149 * pages. It is better to clamp down on writers than to start swapping, and
150 * performing lots of scanning.
151 *
152 * We only allow 1/2 of the currently-unmapped memory to be dirtied.
153 *
154 * We don't permit the clamping level to fall below 5% - that is getting rather
155 * excessive.
156 *
157 * We make sure that the background writeout level is below the adjusted
158 * clamping level.
159 */
Johannes Weinerccafa282012-01-10 15:07:44 -0800160
Johannes Weinera756cf52012-01-10 15:07:49 -0800161/*
162 * In a memory zone, there is a certain amount of pages we consider
163 * available for the page cache, which is essentially the number of
164 * free and reclaimable pages, minus some zone reserves to protect
165 * lowmem and the ability to uphold the zone's watermarks without
166 * requiring writeback.
167 *
168 * This number of dirtyable pages is the base value of which the
169 * user-configurable dirty ratio is the effictive number of pages that
170 * are allowed to be actually dirtied. Per individual zone, or
171 * globally by using the sum of dirtyable pages over all zones.
172 *
173 * Because the user is allowed to specify the dirty limit globally as
174 * absolute number of bytes, calculating the per-zone dirty limit can
175 * require translating the configured limit into a percentage of
176 * global dirtyable memory first.
177 */
178
Johannes Weiner1edf2232012-01-10 15:06:57 -0800179static unsigned long highmem_dirtyable_memory(unsigned long total)
180{
181#ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM
182 int node;
183 unsigned long x = 0;
184
185 for_each_node_state(node, N_HIGH_MEMORY) {
186 struct zone *z =
187 &NODE_DATA(node)->node_zones[ZONE_HIGHMEM];
188
189 x += zone_page_state(z, NR_FREE_PAGES) +
Johannes Weinerab8fabd2012-01-10 15:07:42 -0800190 zone_reclaimable_pages(z) - z->dirty_balance_reserve;
Johannes Weiner1edf2232012-01-10 15:06:57 -0800191 }
192 /*
Sonny Rao64a552f2012-12-20 15:05:07 -0800193 * Unreclaimable memory (kernel memory or anonymous memory
194 * without swap) can bring down the dirtyable pages below
195 * the zone's dirty balance reserve and the above calculation
196 * will underflow. However we still want to add in nodes
197 * which are below threshold (negative values) to get a more
198 * accurate calculation but make sure that the total never
199 * underflows.
200 */
201 if ((long)x < 0)
202 x = 0;
203
204 /*
Johannes Weiner1edf2232012-01-10 15:06:57 -0800205 * Make sure that the number of highmem pages is never larger
206 * than the number of the total dirtyable memory. This can only
207 * occur in very strange VM situations but we want to make sure
208 * that this does not occur.
209 */
210 return min(x, total);
211#else
212 return 0;
213#endif
214}
215
216/**
Johannes Weinerccafa282012-01-10 15:07:44 -0800217 * global_dirtyable_memory - number of globally dirtyable pages
Johannes Weiner1edf2232012-01-10 15:06:57 -0800218 *
Johannes Weinerccafa282012-01-10 15:07:44 -0800219 * Returns the global number of pages potentially available for dirty
220 * page cache. This is the base value for the global dirty limits.
Johannes Weiner1edf2232012-01-10 15:06:57 -0800221 */
Johannes Weinerccafa282012-01-10 15:07:44 -0800222unsigned long global_dirtyable_memory(void)
Johannes Weiner1edf2232012-01-10 15:06:57 -0800223{
224 unsigned long x;
225
Sonny Rao64a552f2012-12-20 15:05:07 -0800226 x = global_page_state(NR_FREE_PAGES) + global_reclaimable_pages();
227 x -= min(x, dirty_balance_reserve);
Johannes Weiner1edf2232012-01-10 15:06:57 -0800228
229 if (!vm_highmem_is_dirtyable)
230 x -= highmem_dirtyable_memory(x);
231
232 return x + 1; /* Ensure that we never return 0 */
233}
234
235/*
Johannes Weinerccafa282012-01-10 15:07:44 -0800236 * global_dirty_limits - background-writeback and dirty-throttling thresholds
237 *
238 * Calculate the dirty thresholds based on sysctl parameters
239 * - vm.dirty_background_ratio or vm.dirty_background_bytes
240 * - vm.dirty_ratio or vm.dirty_bytes
241 * The dirty limits will be lifted by 1/4 for PF_LESS_THROTTLE (ie. nfsd) and
242 * real-time tasks.
243 */
244void global_dirty_limits(unsigned long *pbackground, unsigned long *pdirty)
245{
246 unsigned long background;
247 unsigned long dirty;
248 unsigned long uninitialized_var(available_memory);
249 struct task_struct *tsk;
250
251 if (!vm_dirty_bytes || !dirty_background_bytes)
252 available_memory = global_dirtyable_memory();
253
254 if (vm_dirty_bytes)
255 dirty = DIV_ROUND_UP(vm_dirty_bytes, PAGE_SIZE);
256 else
257 dirty = (vm_dirty_ratio * available_memory) / 100;
258
259 if (dirty_background_bytes)
260 background = DIV_ROUND_UP(dirty_background_bytes, PAGE_SIZE);
261 else
262 background = (dirty_background_ratio * available_memory) / 100;
263
264 if (background >= dirty)
265 background = dirty / 2;
266 tsk = current;
267 if (tsk->flags & PF_LESS_THROTTLE || rt_task(tsk)) {
268 background += background / 4;
269 dirty += dirty / 4;
270 }
271 *pbackground = background;
272 *pdirty = dirty;
273 trace_global_dirty_state(background, dirty);
274}
275
Johannes Weinera756cf52012-01-10 15:07:49 -0800276/**
277 * zone_dirtyable_memory - number of dirtyable pages in a zone
278 * @zone: the zone
279 *
280 * Returns the zone's number of pages potentially available for dirty
281 * page cache. This is the base value for the per-zone dirty limits.
282 */
283static unsigned long zone_dirtyable_memory(struct zone *zone)
284{
285 /*
286 * The effective global number of dirtyable pages may exclude
287 * highmem as a big-picture measure to keep the ratio between
288 * dirty memory and lowmem reasonable.
289 *
290 * But this function is purely about the individual zone and a
291 * highmem zone can hold its share of dirty pages, so we don't
292 * care about vm_highmem_is_dirtyable here.
293 */
Sonny Rao64a552f2012-12-20 15:05:07 -0800294 unsigned long nr_pages = zone_page_state(zone, NR_FREE_PAGES) +
295 zone_reclaimable_pages(zone);
296
297 /* don't allow this to underflow */
298 nr_pages -= min(nr_pages, zone->dirty_balance_reserve);
299 return nr_pages;
Johannes Weinera756cf52012-01-10 15:07:49 -0800300}
301
302/**
303 * zone_dirty_limit - maximum number of dirty pages allowed in a zone
304 * @zone: the zone
305 *
306 * Returns the maximum number of dirty pages allowed in a zone, based
307 * on the zone's dirtyable memory.
308 */
309static unsigned long zone_dirty_limit(struct zone *zone)
310{
311 unsigned long zone_memory = zone_dirtyable_memory(zone);
312 struct task_struct *tsk = current;
313 unsigned long dirty;
314
315 if (vm_dirty_bytes)
316 dirty = DIV_ROUND_UP(vm_dirty_bytes, PAGE_SIZE) *
317 zone_memory / global_dirtyable_memory();
318 else
319 dirty = vm_dirty_ratio * zone_memory / 100;
320
321 if (tsk->flags & PF_LESS_THROTTLE || rt_task(tsk))
322 dirty += dirty / 4;
323
324 return dirty;
325}
326
327/**
328 * zone_dirty_ok - tells whether a zone is within its dirty limits
329 * @zone: the zone to check
330 *
331 * Returns %true when the dirty pages in @zone are within the zone's
332 * dirty limit, %false if the limit is exceeded.
333 */
334bool zone_dirty_ok(struct zone *zone)
335{
336 unsigned long limit = zone_dirty_limit(zone);
337
338 return zone_page_state(zone, NR_FILE_DIRTY) +
339 zone_page_state(zone, NR_UNSTABLE_NFS) +
340 zone_page_state(zone, NR_WRITEBACK) <= limit;
341}
342
Johannes Weinerccafa282012-01-10 15:07:44 -0800343/*
Peter Zijlstra04fbfdc2007-10-16 23:25:50 -0700344 * couple the period to the dirty_ratio:
345 *
346 * period/2 ~ roundup_pow_of_two(dirty limit)
347 */
348static int calc_period_shift(void)
349{
350 unsigned long dirty_total;
351
David Rientjes2da02992009-01-06 14:39:31 -0800352 if (vm_dirty_bytes)
353 dirty_total = vm_dirty_bytes / PAGE_SIZE;
354 else
Johannes Weinerccafa282012-01-10 15:07:44 -0800355 dirty_total = (vm_dirty_ratio * global_dirtyable_memory()) /
David Rientjes2da02992009-01-06 14:39:31 -0800356 100;
Peter Zijlstra04fbfdc2007-10-16 23:25:50 -0700357 return 2 + ilog2(dirty_total - 1);
358}
359
360/*
David Rientjes2da02992009-01-06 14:39:31 -0800361 * update the period when the dirty threshold changes.
Peter Zijlstra04fbfdc2007-10-16 23:25:50 -0700362 */
David Rientjes2da02992009-01-06 14:39:31 -0800363static void update_completion_period(void)
364{
365 int shift = calc_period_shift();
366 prop_change_shift(&vm_completions, shift);
Wu Fengguang9d823e82011-06-11 18:10:12 -0600367
368 writeback_set_ratelimit();
David Rientjes2da02992009-01-06 14:39:31 -0800369}
370
371int dirty_background_ratio_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
Alexey Dobriyan8d65af72009-09-23 15:57:19 -0700372 void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp,
David Rientjes2da02992009-01-06 14:39:31 -0800373 loff_t *ppos)
374{
375 int ret;
376
Alexey Dobriyan8d65af72009-09-23 15:57:19 -0700377 ret = proc_dointvec_minmax(table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
David Rientjes2da02992009-01-06 14:39:31 -0800378 if (ret == 0 && write)
379 dirty_background_bytes = 0;
380 return ret;
381}
382
383int dirty_background_bytes_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
Alexey Dobriyan8d65af72009-09-23 15:57:19 -0700384 void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp,
David Rientjes2da02992009-01-06 14:39:31 -0800385 loff_t *ppos)
386{
387 int ret;
388
Alexey Dobriyan8d65af72009-09-23 15:57:19 -0700389 ret = proc_doulongvec_minmax(table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
David Rientjes2da02992009-01-06 14:39:31 -0800390 if (ret == 0 && write)
391 dirty_background_ratio = 0;
392 return ret;
393}
394
Peter Zijlstra04fbfdc2007-10-16 23:25:50 -0700395int dirty_ratio_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
Alexey Dobriyan8d65af72009-09-23 15:57:19 -0700396 void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp,
Peter Zijlstra04fbfdc2007-10-16 23:25:50 -0700397 loff_t *ppos)
398{
399 int old_ratio = vm_dirty_ratio;
David Rientjes2da02992009-01-06 14:39:31 -0800400 int ret;
401
Alexey Dobriyan8d65af72009-09-23 15:57:19 -0700402 ret = proc_dointvec_minmax(table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
Peter Zijlstra04fbfdc2007-10-16 23:25:50 -0700403 if (ret == 0 && write && vm_dirty_ratio != old_ratio) {
David Rientjes2da02992009-01-06 14:39:31 -0800404 update_completion_period();
405 vm_dirty_bytes = 0;
406 }
407 return ret;
408}
409
David Rientjes2da02992009-01-06 14:39:31 -0800410int dirty_bytes_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
Alexey Dobriyan8d65af72009-09-23 15:57:19 -0700411 void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp,
David Rientjes2da02992009-01-06 14:39:31 -0800412 loff_t *ppos)
413{
Sven Wegenerfc3501d2009-02-11 13:04:23 -0800414 unsigned long old_bytes = vm_dirty_bytes;
David Rientjes2da02992009-01-06 14:39:31 -0800415 int ret;
416
Alexey Dobriyan8d65af72009-09-23 15:57:19 -0700417 ret = proc_doulongvec_minmax(table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
David Rientjes2da02992009-01-06 14:39:31 -0800418 if (ret == 0 && write && vm_dirty_bytes != old_bytes) {
419 update_completion_period();
420 vm_dirty_ratio = 0;
Peter Zijlstra04fbfdc2007-10-16 23:25:50 -0700421 }
422 return ret;
423}
424
425/*
426 * Increment the BDI's writeout completion count and the global writeout
427 * completion count. Called from test_clear_page_writeback().
428 */
429static inline void __bdi_writeout_inc(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
430{
Jan Karaf7d2b1e2010-12-08 22:44:24 -0600431 __inc_bdi_stat(bdi, BDI_WRITTEN);
Peter Zijlstraa42dde02008-04-30 00:54:36 -0700432 __prop_inc_percpu_max(&vm_completions, &bdi->completions,
433 bdi->max_prop_frac);
Peter Zijlstra04fbfdc2007-10-16 23:25:50 -0700434}
435
Miklos Szeredidd5656e2008-04-30 00:54:37 -0700436void bdi_writeout_inc(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
437{
438 unsigned long flags;
439
440 local_irq_save(flags);
441 __bdi_writeout_inc(bdi);
442 local_irq_restore(flags);
443}
444EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bdi_writeout_inc);
445
Peter Zijlstra04fbfdc2007-10-16 23:25:50 -0700446/*
447 * Obtain an accurate fraction of the BDI's portion.
448 */
449static void bdi_writeout_fraction(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
450 long *numerator, long *denominator)
451{
Wu Fengguang3efaf0f2010-12-16 22:22:00 -0600452 prop_fraction_percpu(&vm_completions, &bdi->completions,
Peter Zijlstra04fbfdc2007-10-16 23:25:50 -0700453 numerator, denominator);
Peter Zijlstra04fbfdc2007-10-16 23:25:50 -0700454}
455
Peter Zijlstra04fbfdc2007-10-16 23:25:50 -0700456/*
Johannes Weinerd08c4292011-10-31 17:07:05 -0700457 * bdi_min_ratio keeps the sum of the minimum dirty shares of all
458 * registered backing devices, which, for obvious reasons, can not
459 * exceed 100%.
Peter Zijlstra189d3c42008-04-30 00:54:35 -0700460 */
Peter Zijlstra189d3c42008-04-30 00:54:35 -0700461static unsigned int bdi_min_ratio;
462
463int bdi_set_min_ratio(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, unsigned int min_ratio)
464{
465 int ret = 0;
Peter Zijlstra189d3c42008-04-30 00:54:35 -0700466
Jens Axboecfc4ba52009-09-14 13:12:40 +0200467 spin_lock_bh(&bdi_lock);
Peter Zijlstraa42dde02008-04-30 00:54:36 -0700468 if (min_ratio > bdi->max_ratio) {
Peter Zijlstra189d3c42008-04-30 00:54:35 -0700469 ret = -EINVAL;
Peter Zijlstraa42dde02008-04-30 00:54:36 -0700470 } else {
471 min_ratio -= bdi->min_ratio;
472 if (bdi_min_ratio + min_ratio < 100) {
473 bdi_min_ratio += min_ratio;
474 bdi->min_ratio += min_ratio;
475 } else {
476 ret = -EINVAL;
477 }
478 }
Jens Axboecfc4ba52009-09-14 13:12:40 +0200479 spin_unlock_bh(&bdi_lock);
Peter Zijlstra189d3c42008-04-30 00:54:35 -0700480
481 return ret;
482}
483
Peter Zijlstraa42dde02008-04-30 00:54:36 -0700484int bdi_set_max_ratio(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, unsigned max_ratio)
485{
Peter Zijlstraa42dde02008-04-30 00:54:36 -0700486 int ret = 0;
487
488 if (max_ratio > 100)
489 return -EINVAL;
490
Jens Axboecfc4ba52009-09-14 13:12:40 +0200491 spin_lock_bh(&bdi_lock);
Peter Zijlstraa42dde02008-04-30 00:54:36 -0700492 if (bdi->min_ratio > max_ratio) {
493 ret = -EINVAL;
494 } else {
495 bdi->max_ratio = max_ratio;
496 bdi->max_prop_frac = (PROP_FRAC_BASE * max_ratio) / 100;
497 }
Jens Axboecfc4ba52009-09-14 13:12:40 +0200498 spin_unlock_bh(&bdi_lock);
Peter Zijlstraa42dde02008-04-30 00:54:36 -0700499
500 return ret;
501}
502EXPORT_SYMBOL(bdi_set_max_ratio);
503
Wu Fengguang6c14ae12011-03-02 16:04:18 -0600504static unsigned long dirty_freerun_ceiling(unsigned long thresh,
505 unsigned long bg_thresh)
506{
507 return (thresh + bg_thresh) / 2;
508}
509
Wu Fengguangffd1f602011-06-19 22:18:42 -0600510static unsigned long hard_dirty_limit(unsigned long thresh)
511{
512 return max(thresh, global_dirty_limit);
513}
514
Wu Fengguang6f718652011-03-02 17:14:34 -0600515/**
Wu Fengguang1babe182010-08-11 14:17:40 -0700516 * bdi_dirty_limit - @bdi's share of dirty throttling threshold
Wu Fengguang6f718652011-03-02 17:14:34 -0600517 * @bdi: the backing_dev_info to query
518 * @dirty: global dirty limit in pages
Wu Fengguang1babe182010-08-11 14:17:40 -0700519 *
Wu Fengguang6f718652011-03-02 17:14:34 -0600520 * Returns @bdi's dirty limit in pages. The term "dirty" in the context of
521 * dirty balancing includes all PG_dirty, PG_writeback and NFS unstable pages.
Wu Fengguangaed21ad2011-11-23 11:44:41 -0600522 *
523 * Note that balance_dirty_pages() will only seriously take it as a hard limit
524 * when sleeping max_pause per page is not enough to keep the dirty pages under
525 * control. For example, when the device is completely stalled due to some error
526 * conditions, or when there are 1000 dd tasks writing to a slow 10MB/s USB key.
527 * In the other normal situations, it acts more gently by throttling the tasks
528 * more (rather than completely block them) when the bdi dirty pages go high.
Wu Fengguang6f718652011-03-02 17:14:34 -0600529 *
530 * It allocates high/low dirty limits to fast/slow devices, in order to prevent
Wu Fengguang1babe182010-08-11 14:17:40 -0700531 * - starving fast devices
532 * - piling up dirty pages (that will take long time to sync) on slow devices
533 *
534 * The bdi's share of dirty limit will be adapting to its throughput and
535 * bounded by the bdi->min_ratio and/or bdi->max_ratio parameters, if set.
536 */
537unsigned long bdi_dirty_limit(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, unsigned long dirty)
Wu Fengguang16c40422010-08-11 14:17:39 -0700538{
539 u64 bdi_dirty;
540 long numerator, denominator;
Peter Zijlstra04fbfdc2007-10-16 23:25:50 -0700541
Wu Fengguang16c40422010-08-11 14:17:39 -0700542 /*
543 * Calculate this BDI's share of the dirty ratio.
544 */
545 bdi_writeout_fraction(bdi, &numerator, &denominator);
Peter Zijlstra04fbfdc2007-10-16 23:25:50 -0700546
Wu Fengguang16c40422010-08-11 14:17:39 -0700547 bdi_dirty = (dirty * (100 - bdi_min_ratio)) / 100;
548 bdi_dirty *= numerator;
549 do_div(bdi_dirty, denominator);
Peter Zijlstra04fbfdc2007-10-16 23:25:50 -0700550
Wu Fengguang16c40422010-08-11 14:17:39 -0700551 bdi_dirty += (dirty * bdi->min_ratio) / 100;
552 if (bdi_dirty > (dirty * bdi->max_ratio) / 100)
553 bdi_dirty = dirty * bdi->max_ratio / 100;
554
555 return bdi_dirty;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700556}
557
Wu Fengguang6c14ae12011-03-02 16:04:18 -0600558/*
Maxim Patlasov459b18d2013-09-11 14:22:46 -0700559 * setpoint - dirty 3
560 * f(dirty) := 1.0 + (----------------)
561 * limit - setpoint
562 *
563 * it's a 3rd order polynomial that subjects to
564 *
565 * (1) f(freerun) = 2.0 => rampup dirty_ratelimit reasonably fast
566 * (2) f(setpoint) = 1.0 => the balance point
567 * (3) f(limit) = 0 => the hard limit
568 * (4) df/dx <= 0 => negative feedback control
569 * (5) the closer to setpoint, the smaller |df/dx| (and the reverse)
570 * => fast response on large errors; small oscillation near setpoint
571 */
572static inline long long pos_ratio_polynom(unsigned long setpoint,
573 unsigned long dirty,
574 unsigned long limit)
575{
576 long long pos_ratio;
577 long x;
578
579 x = div_s64(((s64)setpoint - (s64)dirty) << RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT,
580 limit - setpoint + 1);
581 pos_ratio = x;
582 pos_ratio = pos_ratio * x >> RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT;
583 pos_ratio = pos_ratio * x >> RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT;
584 pos_ratio += 1 << RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT;
585
586 return clamp(pos_ratio, 0LL, 2LL << RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT);
587}
588
589/*
Wu Fengguang6c14ae12011-03-02 16:04:18 -0600590 * Dirty position control.
591 *
592 * (o) global/bdi setpoints
593 *
594 * We want the dirty pages be balanced around the global/bdi setpoints.
595 * When the number of dirty pages is higher/lower than the setpoint, the
596 * dirty position control ratio (and hence task dirty ratelimit) will be
597 * decreased/increased to bring the dirty pages back to the setpoint.
598 *
599 * pos_ratio = 1 << RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT
600 *
601 * if (dirty < setpoint) scale up pos_ratio
602 * if (dirty > setpoint) scale down pos_ratio
603 *
604 * if (bdi_dirty < bdi_setpoint) scale up pos_ratio
605 * if (bdi_dirty > bdi_setpoint) scale down pos_ratio
606 *
607 * task_ratelimit = dirty_ratelimit * pos_ratio >> RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT
608 *
609 * (o) global control line
610 *
611 * ^ pos_ratio
612 * |
613 * | |<===== global dirty control scope ======>|
614 * 2.0 .............*
615 * | .*
616 * | . *
617 * | . *
618 * | . *
619 * | . *
620 * | . *
621 * 1.0 ................................*
622 * | . . *
623 * | . . *
624 * | . . *
625 * | . . *
626 * | . . *
627 * 0 +------------.------------------.----------------------*------------->
628 * freerun^ setpoint^ limit^ dirty pages
629 *
630 * (o) bdi control line
631 *
632 * ^ pos_ratio
633 * |
634 * | *
635 * | *
636 * | *
637 * | *
638 * | * |<=========== span ============>|
639 * 1.0 .......................*
640 * | . *
641 * | . *
642 * | . *
643 * | . *
644 * | . *
645 * | . *
646 * | . *
647 * | . *
648 * | . *
649 * | . *
650 * | . *
651 * 1/4 ...............................................* * * * * * * * * * * *
652 * | . .
653 * | . .
654 * | . .
655 * 0 +----------------------.-------------------------------.------------->
656 * bdi_setpoint^ x_intercept^
657 *
658 * The bdi control line won't drop below pos_ratio=1/4, so that bdi_dirty can
659 * be smoothly throttled down to normal if it starts high in situations like
660 * - start writing to a slow SD card and a fast disk at the same time. The SD
661 * card's bdi_dirty may rush to many times higher than bdi_setpoint.
662 * - the bdi dirty thresh drops quickly due to change of JBOD workload
663 */
664static unsigned long bdi_position_ratio(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
665 unsigned long thresh,
666 unsigned long bg_thresh,
667 unsigned long dirty,
668 unsigned long bdi_thresh,
669 unsigned long bdi_dirty)
670{
671 unsigned long write_bw = bdi->avg_write_bandwidth;
672 unsigned long freerun = dirty_freerun_ceiling(thresh, bg_thresh);
673 unsigned long limit = hard_dirty_limit(thresh);
674 unsigned long x_intercept;
675 unsigned long setpoint; /* dirty pages' target balance point */
676 unsigned long bdi_setpoint;
677 unsigned long span;
678 long long pos_ratio; /* for scaling up/down the rate limit */
679 long x;
680
681 if (unlikely(dirty >= limit))
682 return 0;
683
684 /*
685 * global setpoint
686 *
Maxim Patlasov459b18d2013-09-11 14:22:46 -0700687 * See comment for pos_ratio_polynom().
Wu Fengguang6c14ae12011-03-02 16:04:18 -0600688 */
689 setpoint = (freerun + limit) / 2;
Maxim Patlasov459b18d2013-09-11 14:22:46 -0700690 pos_ratio = pos_ratio_polynom(setpoint, dirty, limit);
691
692 /*
693 * The strictlimit feature is a tool preventing mistrusted filesystems
694 * from growing a large number of dirty pages before throttling. For
695 * such filesystems balance_dirty_pages always checks bdi counters
696 * against bdi limits. Even if global "nr_dirty" is under "freerun".
697 * This is especially important for fuse which sets bdi->max_ratio to
698 * 1% by default. Without strictlimit feature, fuse writeback may
699 * consume arbitrary amount of RAM because it is accounted in
700 * NR_WRITEBACK_TEMP which is not involved in calculating "nr_dirty".
701 *
702 * Here, in bdi_position_ratio(), we calculate pos_ratio based on
703 * two values: bdi_dirty and bdi_thresh. Let's consider an example:
704 * total amount of RAM is 16GB, bdi->max_ratio is equal to 1%, global
705 * limits are set by default to 10% and 20% (background and throttle).
706 * Then bdi_thresh is 1% of 20% of 16GB. This amounts to ~8K pages.
707 * bdi_dirty_limit(bdi, bg_thresh) is about ~4K pages. bdi_setpoint is
708 * about ~6K pages (as the average of background and throttle bdi
709 * limits). The 3rd order polynomial will provide positive feedback if
710 * bdi_dirty is under bdi_setpoint and vice versa.
711 *
712 * Note, that we cannot use global counters in these calculations
713 * because we want to throttle process writing to a strictlimit BDI
714 * much earlier than global "freerun" is reached (~23MB vs. ~2.3GB
715 * in the example above).
716 */
717 if (unlikely(bdi->capabilities & BDI_CAP_STRICTLIMIT)) {
718 long long bdi_pos_ratio;
719 unsigned long bdi_bg_thresh;
720
721 if (bdi_dirty < 8)
722 return min_t(long long, pos_ratio * 2,
723 2 << RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT);
724
725 if (bdi_dirty >= bdi_thresh)
726 return 0;
727
728 bdi_bg_thresh = div_u64((u64)bdi_thresh * bg_thresh, thresh);
729 bdi_setpoint = dirty_freerun_ceiling(bdi_thresh,
730 bdi_bg_thresh);
731
732 if (bdi_setpoint == 0 || bdi_setpoint == bdi_thresh)
733 return 0;
734
735 bdi_pos_ratio = pos_ratio_polynom(bdi_setpoint, bdi_dirty,
736 bdi_thresh);
737
738 /*
739 * Typically, for strictlimit case, bdi_setpoint << setpoint
740 * and pos_ratio >> bdi_pos_ratio. In the other words global
741 * state ("dirty") is not limiting factor and we have to
742 * make decision based on bdi counters. But there is an
743 * important case when global pos_ratio should get precedence:
744 * global limits are exceeded (e.g. due to activities on other
745 * BDIs) while given strictlimit BDI is below limit.
746 *
747 * "pos_ratio * bdi_pos_ratio" would work for the case above,
748 * but it would look too non-natural for the case of all
749 * activity in the system coming from a single strictlimit BDI
750 * with bdi->max_ratio == 100%.
751 *
752 * Note that min() below somewhat changes the dynamics of the
753 * control system. Normally, pos_ratio value can be well over 3
754 * (when globally we are at freerun and bdi is well below bdi
755 * setpoint). Now the maximum pos_ratio in the same situation
756 * is 2. We might want to tweak this if we observe the control
757 * system is too slow to adapt.
758 */
759 return min(pos_ratio, bdi_pos_ratio);
760 }
Wu Fengguang6c14ae12011-03-02 16:04:18 -0600761
762 /*
763 * We have computed basic pos_ratio above based on global situation. If
764 * the bdi is over/under its share of dirty pages, we want to scale
765 * pos_ratio further down/up. That is done by the following mechanism.
766 */
767
768 /*
769 * bdi setpoint
770 *
771 * f(bdi_dirty) := 1.0 + k * (bdi_dirty - bdi_setpoint)
772 *
773 * x_intercept - bdi_dirty
774 * := --------------------------
775 * x_intercept - bdi_setpoint
776 *
777 * The main bdi control line is a linear function that subjects to
778 *
779 * (1) f(bdi_setpoint) = 1.0
780 * (2) k = - 1 / (8 * write_bw) (in single bdi case)
781 * or equally: x_intercept = bdi_setpoint + 8 * write_bw
782 *
783 * For single bdi case, the dirty pages are observed to fluctuate
784 * regularly within range
785 * [bdi_setpoint - write_bw/2, bdi_setpoint + write_bw/2]
786 * for various filesystems, where (2) can yield in a reasonable 12.5%
787 * fluctuation range for pos_ratio.
788 *
789 * For JBOD case, bdi_thresh (not bdi_dirty!) could fluctuate up to its
790 * own size, so move the slope over accordingly and choose a slope that
791 * yields 100% pos_ratio fluctuation on suddenly doubled bdi_thresh.
792 */
793 if (unlikely(bdi_thresh > thresh))
794 bdi_thresh = thresh;
Wu Fengguangaed21ad2011-11-23 11:44:41 -0600795 /*
796 * It's very possible that bdi_thresh is close to 0 not because the
797 * device is slow, but that it has remained inactive for long time.
798 * Honour such devices a reasonable good (hopefully IO efficient)
799 * threshold, so that the occasional writes won't be blocked and active
800 * writes can rampup the threshold quickly.
801 */
Wu Fengguang8927f662011-08-04 22:16:46 -0600802 bdi_thresh = max(bdi_thresh, (limit - dirty) / 8);
Wu Fengguang6c14ae12011-03-02 16:04:18 -0600803 /*
804 * scale global setpoint to bdi's:
805 * bdi_setpoint = setpoint * bdi_thresh / thresh
806 */
Tejun Heo7c006372015-04-21 16:49:13 -0400807 x = div_u64((u64)bdi_thresh << 16, thresh | 1);
Wu Fengguang6c14ae12011-03-02 16:04:18 -0600808 bdi_setpoint = setpoint * (u64)x >> 16;
809 /*
810 * Use span=(8*write_bw) in single bdi case as indicated by
811 * (thresh - bdi_thresh ~= 0) and transit to bdi_thresh in JBOD case.
812 *
813 * bdi_thresh thresh - bdi_thresh
814 * span = ---------- * (8 * write_bw) + ------------------- * bdi_thresh
815 * thresh thresh
816 */
817 span = (thresh - bdi_thresh + 8 * write_bw) * (u64)x >> 16;
818 x_intercept = bdi_setpoint + span;
819
820 if (bdi_dirty < x_intercept - span / 4) {
Wu Fengguang50657fc2011-10-11 17:06:33 -0600821 pos_ratio = div_u64(pos_ratio * (x_intercept - bdi_dirty),
822 x_intercept - bdi_setpoint + 1);
Wu Fengguang6c14ae12011-03-02 16:04:18 -0600823 } else
824 pos_ratio /= 4;
825
Wu Fengguang8927f662011-08-04 22:16:46 -0600826 /*
827 * bdi reserve area, safeguard against dirty pool underrun and disk idle
828 * It may push the desired control point of global dirty pages higher
829 * than setpoint.
830 */
831 x_intercept = bdi_thresh / 2;
832 if (bdi_dirty < x_intercept) {
Wu Fengguang50657fc2011-10-11 17:06:33 -0600833 if (bdi_dirty > x_intercept / 8)
834 pos_ratio = div_u64(pos_ratio * x_intercept, bdi_dirty);
835 else
Wu Fengguang8927f662011-08-04 22:16:46 -0600836 pos_ratio *= 8;
837 }
838
Wu Fengguang6c14ae12011-03-02 16:04:18 -0600839 return pos_ratio;
840}
841
Wu Fengguange98be2d2010-08-29 11:22:30 -0600842static void bdi_update_write_bandwidth(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
843 unsigned long elapsed,
844 unsigned long written)
845{
846 const unsigned long period = roundup_pow_of_two(3 * HZ);
847 unsigned long avg = bdi->avg_write_bandwidth;
848 unsigned long old = bdi->write_bandwidth;
849 u64 bw;
850
851 /*
852 * bw = written * HZ / elapsed
853 *
854 * bw * elapsed + write_bandwidth * (period - elapsed)
855 * write_bandwidth = ---------------------------------------------------
856 * period
Tejun Heo2cefdec2015-03-23 00:08:19 -0400857 *
858 * @written may have decreased due to account_page_redirty().
859 * Avoid underflowing @bw calculation.
Wu Fengguange98be2d2010-08-29 11:22:30 -0600860 */
Tejun Heo2cefdec2015-03-23 00:08:19 -0400861 bw = written - min(written, bdi->written_stamp);
Wu Fengguange98be2d2010-08-29 11:22:30 -0600862 bw *= HZ;
863 if (unlikely(elapsed > period)) {
864 do_div(bw, elapsed);
865 avg = bw;
866 goto out;
867 }
868 bw += (u64)bdi->write_bandwidth * (period - elapsed);
869 bw >>= ilog2(period);
870
871 /*
872 * one more level of smoothing, for filtering out sudden spikes
873 */
874 if (avg > old && old >= (unsigned long)bw)
875 avg -= (avg - old) >> 3;
876
877 if (avg < old && old <= (unsigned long)bw)
878 avg += (old - avg) >> 3;
879
880out:
881 bdi->write_bandwidth = bw;
882 bdi->avg_write_bandwidth = avg;
883}
884
Wu Fengguangc42843f2011-03-02 15:54:09 -0600885/*
886 * The global dirtyable memory and dirty threshold could be suddenly knocked
887 * down by a large amount (eg. on the startup of KVM in a swapless system).
888 * This may throw the system into deep dirty exceeded state and throttle
889 * heavy/light dirtiers alike. To retain good responsiveness, maintain
890 * global_dirty_limit for tracking slowly down to the knocked down dirty
891 * threshold.
892 */
893static void update_dirty_limit(unsigned long thresh, unsigned long dirty)
894{
895 unsigned long limit = global_dirty_limit;
896
897 /*
898 * Follow up in one step.
899 */
900 if (limit < thresh) {
901 limit = thresh;
902 goto update;
903 }
904
905 /*
906 * Follow down slowly. Use the higher one as the target, because thresh
907 * may drop below dirty. This is exactly the reason to introduce
908 * global_dirty_limit which is guaranteed to lie above the dirty pages.
909 */
910 thresh = max(thresh, dirty);
911 if (limit > thresh) {
912 limit -= (limit - thresh) >> 5;
913 goto update;
914 }
915 return;
916update:
917 global_dirty_limit = limit;
918}
919
920static void global_update_bandwidth(unsigned long thresh,
921 unsigned long dirty,
922 unsigned long now)
923{
924 static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(dirty_lock);
Tejun Heo510dbab2015-03-04 10:37:43 -0500925 static unsigned long update_time = INITIAL_JIFFIES;
Wu Fengguangc42843f2011-03-02 15:54:09 -0600926
927 /*
928 * check locklessly first to optimize away locking for the most time
929 */
930 if (time_before(now, update_time + BANDWIDTH_INTERVAL))
931 return;
932
933 spin_lock(&dirty_lock);
934 if (time_after_eq(now, update_time + BANDWIDTH_INTERVAL)) {
935 update_dirty_limit(thresh, dirty);
936 update_time = now;
937 }
938 spin_unlock(&dirty_lock);
939}
940
Wu Fengguangbe3ffa22011-06-12 10:51:31 -0600941/*
942 * Maintain bdi->dirty_ratelimit, the base dirty throttle rate.
943 *
944 * Normal bdi tasks will be curbed at or below it in long term.
945 * Obviously it should be around (write_bw / N) when there are N dd tasks.
946 */
947static void bdi_update_dirty_ratelimit(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
948 unsigned long thresh,
949 unsigned long bg_thresh,
950 unsigned long dirty,
951 unsigned long bdi_thresh,
952 unsigned long bdi_dirty,
953 unsigned long dirtied,
954 unsigned long elapsed)
955{
Wu Fengguang73811312011-08-26 15:53:24 -0600956 unsigned long freerun = dirty_freerun_ceiling(thresh, bg_thresh);
957 unsigned long limit = hard_dirty_limit(thresh);
958 unsigned long setpoint = (freerun + limit) / 2;
Wu Fengguangbe3ffa22011-06-12 10:51:31 -0600959 unsigned long write_bw = bdi->avg_write_bandwidth;
960 unsigned long dirty_ratelimit = bdi->dirty_ratelimit;
961 unsigned long dirty_rate;
962 unsigned long task_ratelimit;
963 unsigned long balanced_dirty_ratelimit;
964 unsigned long pos_ratio;
Wu Fengguang73811312011-08-26 15:53:24 -0600965 unsigned long step;
966 unsigned long x;
Wu Fengguangbe3ffa22011-06-12 10:51:31 -0600967
968 /*
969 * The dirty rate will match the writeout rate in long term, except
970 * when dirty pages are truncated by userspace or re-dirtied by FS.
971 */
972 dirty_rate = (dirtied - bdi->dirtied_stamp) * HZ / elapsed;
973
974 pos_ratio = bdi_position_ratio(bdi, thresh, bg_thresh, dirty,
975 bdi_thresh, bdi_dirty);
976 /*
977 * task_ratelimit reflects each dd's dirty rate for the past 200ms.
978 */
979 task_ratelimit = (u64)dirty_ratelimit *
980 pos_ratio >> RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT;
981 task_ratelimit++; /* it helps rampup dirty_ratelimit from tiny values */
982
983 /*
984 * A linear estimation of the "balanced" throttle rate. The theory is,
985 * if there are N dd tasks, each throttled at task_ratelimit, the bdi's
986 * dirty_rate will be measured to be (N * task_ratelimit). So the below
987 * formula will yield the balanced rate limit (write_bw / N).
988 *
989 * Note that the expanded form is not a pure rate feedback:
990 * rate_(i+1) = rate_(i) * (write_bw / dirty_rate) (1)
991 * but also takes pos_ratio into account:
992 * rate_(i+1) = rate_(i) * (write_bw / dirty_rate) * pos_ratio (2)
993 *
994 * (1) is not realistic because pos_ratio also takes part in balancing
995 * the dirty rate. Consider the state
996 * pos_ratio = 0.5 (3)
997 * rate = 2 * (write_bw / N) (4)
998 * If (1) is used, it will stuck in that state! Because each dd will
999 * be throttled at
1000 * task_ratelimit = pos_ratio * rate = (write_bw / N) (5)
1001 * yielding
1002 * dirty_rate = N * task_ratelimit = write_bw (6)
1003 * put (6) into (1) we get
1004 * rate_(i+1) = rate_(i) (7)
1005 *
1006 * So we end up using (2) to always keep
1007 * rate_(i+1) ~= (write_bw / N) (8)
1008 * regardless of the value of pos_ratio. As long as (8) is satisfied,
1009 * pos_ratio is able to drive itself to 1.0, which is not only where
1010 * the dirty count meet the setpoint, but also where the slope of
1011 * pos_ratio is most flat and hence task_ratelimit is least fluctuated.
1012 */
1013 balanced_dirty_ratelimit = div_u64((u64)task_ratelimit * write_bw,
1014 dirty_rate | 1);
Wu Fengguangbdaac492011-08-03 14:30:36 -06001015 /*
1016 * balanced_dirty_ratelimit ~= (write_bw / N) <= write_bw
1017 */
1018 if (unlikely(balanced_dirty_ratelimit > write_bw))
1019 balanced_dirty_ratelimit = write_bw;
Wu Fengguangbe3ffa22011-06-12 10:51:31 -06001020
Wu Fengguang73811312011-08-26 15:53:24 -06001021 /*
1022 * We could safely do this and return immediately:
1023 *
1024 * bdi->dirty_ratelimit = balanced_dirty_ratelimit;
1025 *
1026 * However to get a more stable dirty_ratelimit, the below elaborated
1027 * code makes use of task_ratelimit to filter out sigular points and
1028 * limit the step size.
1029 *
1030 * The below code essentially only uses the relative value of
1031 *
1032 * task_ratelimit - dirty_ratelimit
1033 * = (pos_ratio - 1) * dirty_ratelimit
1034 *
1035 * which reflects the direction and size of dirty position error.
1036 */
1037
1038 /*
1039 * dirty_ratelimit will follow balanced_dirty_ratelimit iff
1040 * task_ratelimit is on the same side of dirty_ratelimit, too.
1041 * For example, when
1042 * - dirty_ratelimit > balanced_dirty_ratelimit
1043 * - dirty_ratelimit > task_ratelimit (dirty pages are above setpoint)
1044 * lowering dirty_ratelimit will help meet both the position and rate
1045 * control targets. Otherwise, don't update dirty_ratelimit if it will
1046 * only help meet the rate target. After all, what the users ultimately
1047 * feel and care are stable dirty rate and small position error.
1048 *
1049 * |task_ratelimit - dirty_ratelimit| is used to limit the step size
1050 * and filter out the sigular points of balanced_dirty_ratelimit. Which
1051 * keeps jumping around randomly and can even leap far away at times
1052 * due to the small 200ms estimation period of dirty_rate (we want to
1053 * keep that period small to reduce time lags).
1054 */
1055 step = 0;
Maxim Patlasov459b18d2013-09-11 14:22:46 -07001056
1057 /*
1058 * For strictlimit case, calculations above were based on bdi counters
1059 * and limits (starting from pos_ratio = bdi_position_ratio() and up to
1060 * balanced_dirty_ratelimit = task_ratelimit * write_bw / dirty_rate).
1061 * Hence, to calculate "step" properly, we have to use bdi_dirty as
1062 * "dirty" and bdi_setpoint as "setpoint".
1063 *
1064 * We rampup dirty_ratelimit forcibly if bdi_dirty is low because
1065 * it's possible that bdi_thresh is close to zero due to inactivity
1066 * of backing device (see the implementation of bdi_dirty_limit()).
1067 */
1068 if (unlikely(bdi->capabilities & BDI_CAP_STRICTLIMIT)) {
1069 dirty = bdi_dirty;
1070 if (bdi_dirty < 8)
1071 setpoint = bdi_dirty + 1;
1072 else
1073 setpoint = (bdi_thresh +
1074 bdi_dirty_limit(bdi, bg_thresh)) / 2;
1075 }
1076
Wu Fengguang73811312011-08-26 15:53:24 -06001077 if (dirty < setpoint) {
1078 x = min(bdi->balanced_dirty_ratelimit,
1079 min(balanced_dirty_ratelimit, task_ratelimit));
1080 if (dirty_ratelimit < x)
1081 step = x - dirty_ratelimit;
1082 } else {
1083 x = max(bdi->balanced_dirty_ratelimit,
1084 max(balanced_dirty_ratelimit, task_ratelimit));
1085 if (dirty_ratelimit > x)
1086 step = dirty_ratelimit - x;
1087 }
1088
1089 /*
1090 * Don't pursue 100% rate matching. It's impossible since the balanced
1091 * rate itself is constantly fluctuating. So decrease the track speed
1092 * when it gets close to the target. Helps eliminate pointless tremors.
1093 */
1094 step >>= dirty_ratelimit / (2 * step + 1);
1095 /*
1096 * Limit the tracking speed to avoid overshooting.
1097 */
1098 step = (step + 7) / 8;
1099
1100 if (dirty_ratelimit < balanced_dirty_ratelimit)
1101 dirty_ratelimit += step;
1102 else
1103 dirty_ratelimit -= step;
1104
1105 bdi->dirty_ratelimit = max(dirty_ratelimit, 1UL);
1106 bdi->balanced_dirty_ratelimit = balanced_dirty_ratelimit;
Wu Fengguangb48c1042011-03-02 17:22:49 -06001107
1108 trace_bdi_dirty_ratelimit(bdi, dirty_rate, task_ratelimit);
Wu Fengguangbe3ffa22011-06-12 10:51:31 -06001109}
1110
Wu Fengguange98be2d2010-08-29 11:22:30 -06001111void __bdi_update_bandwidth(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
Wu Fengguangc42843f2011-03-02 15:54:09 -06001112 unsigned long thresh,
Wu Fengguangaf6a3112011-10-03 20:46:17 -06001113 unsigned long bg_thresh,
Wu Fengguangc42843f2011-03-02 15:54:09 -06001114 unsigned long dirty,
1115 unsigned long bdi_thresh,
1116 unsigned long bdi_dirty,
Wu Fengguange98be2d2010-08-29 11:22:30 -06001117 unsigned long start_time)
1118{
1119 unsigned long now = jiffies;
1120 unsigned long elapsed = now - bdi->bw_time_stamp;
Wu Fengguangbe3ffa22011-06-12 10:51:31 -06001121 unsigned long dirtied;
Wu Fengguange98be2d2010-08-29 11:22:30 -06001122 unsigned long written;
1123
1124 /*
1125 * rate-limit, only update once every 200ms.
1126 */
1127 if (elapsed < BANDWIDTH_INTERVAL)
1128 return;
1129
Wu Fengguangbe3ffa22011-06-12 10:51:31 -06001130 dirtied = percpu_counter_read(&bdi->bdi_stat[BDI_DIRTIED]);
Wu Fengguange98be2d2010-08-29 11:22:30 -06001131 written = percpu_counter_read(&bdi->bdi_stat[BDI_WRITTEN]);
1132
1133 /*
1134 * Skip quiet periods when disk bandwidth is under-utilized.
1135 * (at least 1s idle time between two flusher runs)
1136 */
1137 if (elapsed > HZ && time_before(bdi->bw_time_stamp, start_time))
1138 goto snapshot;
1139
Wu Fengguangbe3ffa22011-06-12 10:51:31 -06001140 if (thresh) {
Wu Fengguangc42843f2011-03-02 15:54:09 -06001141 global_update_bandwidth(thresh, dirty, now);
Wu Fengguangbe3ffa22011-06-12 10:51:31 -06001142 bdi_update_dirty_ratelimit(bdi, thresh, bg_thresh, dirty,
1143 bdi_thresh, bdi_dirty,
1144 dirtied, elapsed);
1145 }
Wu Fengguange98be2d2010-08-29 11:22:30 -06001146 bdi_update_write_bandwidth(bdi, elapsed, written);
1147
1148snapshot:
Wu Fengguangbe3ffa22011-06-12 10:51:31 -06001149 bdi->dirtied_stamp = dirtied;
Wu Fengguange98be2d2010-08-29 11:22:30 -06001150 bdi->written_stamp = written;
1151 bdi->bw_time_stamp = now;
1152}
1153
1154static void bdi_update_bandwidth(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
Wu Fengguangc42843f2011-03-02 15:54:09 -06001155 unsigned long thresh,
Wu Fengguangaf6a3112011-10-03 20:46:17 -06001156 unsigned long bg_thresh,
Wu Fengguangc42843f2011-03-02 15:54:09 -06001157 unsigned long dirty,
1158 unsigned long bdi_thresh,
1159 unsigned long bdi_dirty,
Wu Fengguange98be2d2010-08-29 11:22:30 -06001160 unsigned long start_time)
1161{
1162 if (time_is_after_eq_jiffies(bdi->bw_time_stamp + BANDWIDTH_INTERVAL))
1163 return;
1164 spin_lock(&bdi->wb.list_lock);
Wu Fengguangaf6a3112011-10-03 20:46:17 -06001165 __bdi_update_bandwidth(bdi, thresh, bg_thresh, dirty,
1166 bdi_thresh, bdi_dirty, start_time);
Wu Fengguange98be2d2010-08-29 11:22:30 -06001167 spin_unlock(&bdi->wb.list_lock);
1168}
1169
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001170/*
Wu Fengguang9d823e82011-06-11 18:10:12 -06001171 * After a task dirtied this many pages, balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited_nr()
1172 * will look to see if it needs to start dirty throttling.
1173 *
1174 * If dirty_poll_interval is too low, big NUMA machines will call the expensive
1175 * global_page_state() too often. So scale it near-sqrt to the safety margin
1176 * (the number of pages we may dirty without exceeding the dirty limits).
1177 */
1178static unsigned long dirty_poll_interval(unsigned long dirty,
1179 unsigned long thresh)
1180{
1181 if (thresh > dirty)
1182 return 1UL << (ilog2(thresh - dirty) >> 1);
1183
1184 return 1;
1185}
1186
Fengguang Wu9896f412013-10-16 13:47:03 -07001187static unsigned long bdi_max_pause(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
1188 unsigned long bdi_dirty)
Wu Fengguangc8462cc2011-06-11 19:21:43 -06001189{
Fengguang Wu9896f412013-10-16 13:47:03 -07001190 unsigned long bw = bdi->avg_write_bandwidth;
1191 unsigned long t;
Wu Fengguangc8462cc2011-06-11 19:21:43 -06001192
1193 /*
1194 * Limit pause time for small memory systems. If sleeping for too long
1195 * time, a small pool of dirty/writeback pages may go empty and disk go
1196 * idle.
1197 *
1198 * 8 serves as the safety ratio.
1199 */
Wu Fengguang7ccb9ad2011-11-30 11:08:55 -06001200 t = bdi_dirty / (1 + bw / roundup_pow_of_two(1 + HZ / 8));
1201 t++;
1202
Fengguang Wu9896f412013-10-16 13:47:03 -07001203 return min_t(unsigned long, t, MAX_PAUSE);
Wu Fengguang7ccb9ad2011-11-30 11:08:55 -06001204}
1205
1206static long bdi_min_pause(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
1207 long max_pause,
1208 unsigned long task_ratelimit,
1209 unsigned long dirty_ratelimit,
1210 int *nr_dirtied_pause)
1211{
1212 long hi = ilog2(bdi->avg_write_bandwidth);
1213 long lo = ilog2(bdi->dirty_ratelimit);
1214 long t; /* target pause */
1215 long pause; /* estimated next pause */
1216 int pages; /* target nr_dirtied_pause */
1217
1218 /* target for 10ms pause on 1-dd case */
1219 t = max(1, HZ / 100);
Wu Fengguangc8462cc2011-06-11 19:21:43 -06001220
1221 /*
Wu Fengguang7ccb9ad2011-11-30 11:08:55 -06001222 * Scale up pause time for concurrent dirtiers in order to reduce CPU
1223 * overheads.
1224 *
1225 * (N * 10ms) on 2^N concurrent tasks.
Wu Fengguangc8462cc2011-06-11 19:21:43 -06001226 */
Wu Fengguang7ccb9ad2011-11-30 11:08:55 -06001227 if (hi > lo)
1228 t += (hi - lo) * (10 * HZ) / 1024;
1229
1230 /*
1231 * This is a bit convoluted. We try to base the next nr_dirtied_pause
1232 * on the much more stable dirty_ratelimit. However the next pause time
1233 * will be computed based on task_ratelimit and the two rate limits may
1234 * depart considerably at some time. Especially if task_ratelimit goes
1235 * below dirty_ratelimit/2 and the target pause is max_pause, the next
1236 * pause time will be max_pause*2 _trimmed down_ to max_pause. As a
1237 * result task_ratelimit won't be executed faithfully, which could
1238 * eventually bring down dirty_ratelimit.
1239 *
1240 * We apply two rules to fix it up:
1241 * 1) try to estimate the next pause time and if necessary, use a lower
1242 * nr_dirtied_pause so as not to exceed max_pause. When this happens,
1243 * nr_dirtied_pause will be "dancing" with task_ratelimit.
1244 * 2) limit the target pause time to max_pause/2, so that the normal
1245 * small fluctuations of task_ratelimit won't trigger rule (1) and
1246 * nr_dirtied_pause will remain as stable as dirty_ratelimit.
1247 */
1248 t = min(t, 1 + max_pause / 2);
1249 pages = dirty_ratelimit * t / roundup_pow_of_two(HZ);
1250
Wu Fengguang5b9b3572011-12-06 13:17:17 -06001251 /*
1252 * Tiny nr_dirtied_pause is found to hurt I/O performance in the test
1253 * case fio-mmap-randwrite-64k, which does 16*{sync read, async write}.
1254 * When the 16 consecutive reads are often interrupted by some dirty
1255 * throttling pause during the async writes, cfq will go into idles
1256 * (deadline is fine). So push nr_dirtied_pause as high as possible
1257 * until reaches DIRTY_POLL_THRESH=32 pages.
1258 */
1259 if (pages < DIRTY_POLL_THRESH) {
1260 t = max_pause;
1261 pages = dirty_ratelimit * t / roundup_pow_of_two(HZ);
1262 if (pages > DIRTY_POLL_THRESH) {
1263 pages = DIRTY_POLL_THRESH;
1264 t = HZ * DIRTY_POLL_THRESH / dirty_ratelimit;
1265 }
1266 }
1267
Wu Fengguang7ccb9ad2011-11-30 11:08:55 -06001268 pause = HZ * pages / (task_ratelimit + 1);
1269 if (pause > max_pause) {
1270 t = max_pause;
1271 pages = task_ratelimit * t / roundup_pow_of_two(HZ);
1272 }
1273
1274 *nr_dirtied_pause = pages;
1275 /*
1276 * The minimal pause time will normally be half the target pause time.
1277 */
Wu Fengguang5b9b3572011-12-06 13:17:17 -06001278 return pages >= DIRTY_POLL_THRESH ? 1 + t / 2 : t;
Wu Fengguangc8462cc2011-06-11 19:21:43 -06001279}
1280
Maxim Patlasov459b18d2013-09-11 14:22:46 -07001281static inline void bdi_dirty_limits(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
1282 unsigned long dirty_thresh,
1283 unsigned long background_thresh,
1284 unsigned long *bdi_dirty,
1285 unsigned long *bdi_thresh,
1286 unsigned long *bdi_bg_thresh)
1287{
1288 unsigned long bdi_reclaimable;
1289
1290 /*
1291 * bdi_thresh is not treated as some limiting factor as
1292 * dirty_thresh, due to reasons
1293 * - in JBOD setup, bdi_thresh can fluctuate a lot
1294 * - in a system with HDD and USB key, the USB key may somehow
1295 * go into state (bdi_dirty >> bdi_thresh) either because
1296 * bdi_dirty starts high, or because bdi_thresh drops low.
1297 * In this case we don't want to hard throttle the USB key
1298 * dirtiers for 100 seconds until bdi_dirty drops under
1299 * bdi_thresh. Instead the auxiliary bdi control line in
1300 * bdi_position_ratio() will let the dirtier task progress
1301 * at some rate <= (write_bw / 2) for bringing down bdi_dirty.
1302 */
1303 *bdi_thresh = bdi_dirty_limit(bdi, dirty_thresh);
1304
1305 if (bdi_bg_thresh)
1306 *bdi_bg_thresh = div_u64((u64)*bdi_thresh *
1307 background_thresh,
1308 dirty_thresh);
1309
1310 /*
1311 * In order to avoid the stacked BDI deadlock we need
1312 * to ensure we accurately count the 'dirty' pages when
1313 * the threshold is low.
1314 *
1315 * Otherwise it would be possible to get thresh+n pages
1316 * reported dirty, even though there are thresh-m pages
1317 * actually dirty; with m+n sitting in the percpu
1318 * deltas.
1319 */
1320 if (*bdi_thresh < 2 * bdi_stat_error(bdi)) {
1321 bdi_reclaimable = bdi_stat_sum(bdi, BDI_RECLAIMABLE);
1322 *bdi_dirty = bdi_reclaimable +
1323 bdi_stat_sum(bdi, BDI_WRITEBACK);
1324 } else {
1325 bdi_reclaimable = bdi_stat(bdi, BDI_RECLAIMABLE);
1326 *bdi_dirty = bdi_reclaimable +
1327 bdi_stat(bdi, BDI_WRITEBACK);
1328 }
1329}
1330
Wu Fengguang9d823e82011-06-11 18:10:12 -06001331/*
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001332 * balance_dirty_pages() must be called by processes which are generating dirty
1333 * data. It looks at the number of dirty pages in the machine and will force
Wu Fengguang143dfe82010-08-27 18:45:12 -06001334 * the caller to wait once crossing the (background_thresh + dirty_thresh) / 2.
Jens Axboe5b0830c2009-09-23 19:37:09 +02001335 * If we're over `background_thresh' then the writeback threads are woken to
1336 * perform some writeout.
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001337 */
Wu Fengguang3a2e9a52009-09-23 21:56:00 +08001338static void balance_dirty_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
Wu Fengguang143dfe82010-08-27 18:45:12 -06001339 unsigned long pages_dirtied)
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001340{
Wu Fengguang143dfe82010-08-27 18:45:12 -06001341 unsigned long nr_reclaimable; /* = file_dirty + unstable_nfs */
Wu Fengguang77627412010-09-12 13:34:05 -06001342 unsigned long nr_dirty; /* = file_dirty + writeback + unstable_nfs */
David Rientjes364aeb22009-01-06 14:39:29 -08001343 unsigned long background_thresh;
1344 unsigned long dirty_thresh;
Wu Fengguang83712352011-06-11 19:25:42 -06001345 long period;
Wu Fengguang7ccb9ad2011-11-30 11:08:55 -06001346 long pause;
1347 long max_pause;
1348 long min_pause;
1349 int nr_dirtied_pause;
Wu Fengguange50e3722010-08-11 14:17:37 -07001350 bool dirty_exceeded = false;
Wu Fengguang143dfe82010-08-27 18:45:12 -06001351 unsigned long task_ratelimit;
Wu Fengguang7ccb9ad2011-11-30 11:08:55 -06001352 unsigned long dirty_ratelimit;
Wu Fengguang143dfe82010-08-27 18:45:12 -06001353 unsigned long pos_ratio;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001354 struct backing_dev_info *bdi = mapping->backing_dev_info;
Maxim Patlasov459b18d2013-09-11 14:22:46 -07001355 bool strictlimit = bdi->capabilities & BDI_CAP_STRICTLIMIT;
Wu Fengguange98be2d2010-08-29 11:22:30 -06001356 unsigned long start_time = jiffies;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001357
1358 for (;;) {
Wu Fengguang83712352011-06-11 19:25:42 -06001359 unsigned long now = jiffies;
Maxim Patlasov459b18d2013-09-11 14:22:46 -07001360 unsigned long uninitialized_var(bdi_thresh);
1361 unsigned long thresh;
1362 unsigned long uninitialized_var(bdi_dirty);
1363 unsigned long dirty;
1364 unsigned long bg_thresh;
Wu Fengguang83712352011-06-11 19:25:42 -06001365
Wu Fengguang143dfe82010-08-27 18:45:12 -06001366 /*
1367 * Unstable writes are a feature of certain networked
1368 * filesystems (i.e. NFS) in which data may have been
1369 * written to the server's write cache, but has not yet
1370 * been flushed to permanent storage.
1371 */
Peter Zijlstra5fce25a2007-11-14 16:59:15 -08001372 nr_reclaimable = global_page_state(NR_FILE_DIRTY) +
1373 global_page_state(NR_UNSTABLE_NFS);
Wu Fengguang77627412010-09-12 13:34:05 -06001374 nr_dirty = nr_reclaimable + global_page_state(NR_WRITEBACK);
Peter Zijlstra5fce25a2007-11-14 16:59:15 -08001375
Wu Fengguang16c40422010-08-11 14:17:39 -07001376 global_dirty_limits(&background_thresh, &dirty_thresh);
1377
Maxim Patlasov459b18d2013-09-11 14:22:46 -07001378 if (unlikely(strictlimit)) {
1379 bdi_dirty_limits(bdi, dirty_thresh, background_thresh,
1380 &bdi_dirty, &bdi_thresh, &bg_thresh);
1381
1382 dirty = bdi_dirty;
1383 thresh = bdi_thresh;
1384 } else {
1385 dirty = nr_dirty;
1386 thresh = dirty_thresh;
1387 bg_thresh = background_thresh;
1388 }
1389
Wu Fengguang16c40422010-08-11 14:17:39 -07001390 /*
1391 * Throttle it only when the background writeback cannot
1392 * catch-up. This avoids (excessively) small writeouts
Maxim Patlasov459b18d2013-09-11 14:22:46 -07001393 * when the bdi limits are ramping up in case of !strictlimit.
1394 *
1395 * In strictlimit case make decision based on the bdi counters
1396 * and limits. Small writeouts when the bdi limits are ramping
1397 * up are the price we consciously pay for strictlimit-ing.
Wu Fengguang16c40422010-08-11 14:17:39 -07001398 */
Maxim Patlasov459b18d2013-09-11 14:22:46 -07001399 if (dirty <= dirty_freerun_ceiling(thresh, bg_thresh)) {
Wu Fengguang83712352011-06-11 19:25:42 -06001400 current->dirty_paused_when = now;
1401 current->nr_dirtied = 0;
Wu Fengguang7ccb9ad2011-11-30 11:08:55 -06001402 current->nr_dirtied_pause =
Maxim Patlasov459b18d2013-09-11 14:22:46 -07001403 dirty_poll_interval(dirty, thresh);
Wu Fengguang16c40422010-08-11 14:17:39 -07001404 break;
Wu Fengguang83712352011-06-11 19:25:42 -06001405 }
Wu Fengguang16c40422010-08-11 14:17:39 -07001406
Wu Fengguang143dfe82010-08-27 18:45:12 -06001407 if (unlikely(!writeback_in_progress(bdi)))
1408 bdi_start_background_writeback(bdi);
1409
Maxim Patlasov459b18d2013-09-11 14:22:46 -07001410 if (!strictlimit)
1411 bdi_dirty_limits(bdi, dirty_thresh, background_thresh,
1412 &bdi_dirty, &bdi_thresh, NULL);
Peter Zijlstra5fce25a2007-11-14 16:59:15 -08001413
Wu Fengguang82791942011-12-03 21:26:01 -06001414 dirty_exceeded = (bdi_dirty > bdi_thresh) &&
Maxim Patlasov459b18d2013-09-11 14:22:46 -07001415 ((nr_dirty > dirty_thresh) || strictlimit);
Wu Fengguang143dfe82010-08-27 18:45:12 -06001416 if (dirty_exceeded && !bdi->dirty_exceeded)
Peter Zijlstra04fbfdc2007-10-16 23:25:50 -07001417 bdi->dirty_exceeded = 1;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001418
Wu Fengguangaf6a3112011-10-03 20:46:17 -06001419 bdi_update_bandwidth(bdi, dirty_thresh, background_thresh,
1420 nr_dirty, bdi_thresh, bdi_dirty,
1421 start_time);
Wu Fengguange98be2d2010-08-29 11:22:30 -06001422
Wu Fengguang143dfe82010-08-27 18:45:12 -06001423 dirty_ratelimit = bdi->dirty_ratelimit;
1424 pos_ratio = bdi_position_ratio(bdi, dirty_thresh,
1425 background_thresh, nr_dirty,
1426 bdi_thresh, bdi_dirty);
Wu Fengguang3a73dbb2011-11-07 19:19:28 +08001427 task_ratelimit = ((u64)dirty_ratelimit * pos_ratio) >>
1428 RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT;
Wu Fengguang7ccb9ad2011-11-30 11:08:55 -06001429 max_pause = bdi_max_pause(bdi, bdi_dirty);
1430 min_pause = bdi_min_pause(bdi, max_pause,
1431 task_ratelimit, dirty_ratelimit,
1432 &nr_dirtied_pause);
1433
Wu Fengguang3a73dbb2011-11-07 19:19:28 +08001434 if (unlikely(task_ratelimit == 0)) {
Wu Fengguang83712352011-06-11 19:25:42 -06001435 period = max_pause;
Wu Fengguangc8462cc2011-06-11 19:21:43 -06001436 pause = max_pause;
Wu Fengguang143dfe82010-08-27 18:45:12 -06001437 goto pause;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001438 }
Wu Fengguang83712352011-06-11 19:25:42 -06001439 period = HZ * pages_dirtied / task_ratelimit;
1440 pause = period;
1441 if (current->dirty_paused_when)
1442 pause -= now - current->dirty_paused_when;
1443 /*
1444 * For less than 1s think time (ext3/4 may block the dirtier
1445 * for up to 800ms from time to time on 1-HDD; so does xfs,
1446 * however at much less frequency), try to compensate it in
1447 * future periods by updating the virtual time; otherwise just
1448 * do a reset, as it may be a light dirtier.
1449 */
Wu Fengguang7ccb9ad2011-11-30 11:08:55 -06001450 if (pause < min_pause) {
Wu Fengguangece13ac2010-08-29 23:33:20 -06001451 trace_balance_dirty_pages(bdi,
1452 dirty_thresh,
1453 background_thresh,
1454 nr_dirty,
1455 bdi_thresh,
1456 bdi_dirty,
1457 dirty_ratelimit,
1458 task_ratelimit,
1459 pages_dirtied,
Wu Fengguang83712352011-06-11 19:25:42 -06001460 period,
Wu Fengguang7ccb9ad2011-11-30 11:08:55 -06001461 min(pause, 0L),
Wu Fengguangece13ac2010-08-29 23:33:20 -06001462 start_time);
Wu Fengguang83712352011-06-11 19:25:42 -06001463 if (pause < -HZ) {
1464 current->dirty_paused_when = now;
1465 current->nr_dirtied = 0;
1466 } else if (period) {
1467 current->dirty_paused_when += period;
1468 current->nr_dirtied = 0;
Wu Fengguang7ccb9ad2011-11-30 11:08:55 -06001469 } else if (current->nr_dirtied_pause <= pages_dirtied)
1470 current->nr_dirtied_pause += pages_dirtied;
Wu Fengguang57fc9782011-06-11 19:32:32 -06001471 break;
1472 }
Wu Fengguang7ccb9ad2011-11-30 11:08:55 -06001473 if (unlikely(pause > max_pause)) {
1474 /* for occasional dropped task_ratelimit */
1475 now += min(pause - max_pause, max_pause);
1476 pause = max_pause;
1477 }
Wu Fengguang143dfe82010-08-27 18:45:12 -06001478
1479pause:
Wu Fengguangece13ac2010-08-29 23:33:20 -06001480 trace_balance_dirty_pages(bdi,
1481 dirty_thresh,
1482 background_thresh,
1483 nr_dirty,
1484 bdi_thresh,
1485 bdi_dirty,
1486 dirty_ratelimit,
1487 task_ratelimit,
1488 pages_dirtied,
Wu Fengguang83712352011-06-11 19:25:42 -06001489 period,
Wu Fengguangece13ac2010-08-29 23:33:20 -06001490 pause,
1491 start_time);
Jan Kara499d05e2011-11-16 19:34:48 +08001492 __set_current_state(TASK_KILLABLE);
Wu Fengguangd25105e2009-10-09 12:40:42 +02001493 io_schedule_timeout(pause);
Jens Axboe87c6a9b2009-09-17 19:59:14 +02001494
Wu Fengguang83712352011-06-11 19:25:42 -06001495 current->dirty_paused_when = now + pause;
1496 current->nr_dirtied = 0;
Wu Fengguang7ccb9ad2011-11-30 11:08:55 -06001497 current->nr_dirtied_pause = nr_dirtied_pause;
Wu Fengguang83712352011-06-11 19:25:42 -06001498
Wu Fengguangffd1f602011-06-19 22:18:42 -06001499 /*
Wu Fengguang1df64712011-11-13 19:47:32 -06001500 * This is typically equal to (nr_dirty < dirty_thresh) and can
1501 * also keep "1000+ dd on a slow USB stick" under control.
Wu Fengguangffd1f602011-06-19 22:18:42 -06001502 */
Wu Fengguang1df64712011-11-13 19:47:32 -06001503 if (task_ratelimit)
Wu Fengguangffd1f602011-06-19 22:18:42 -06001504 break;
Jan Kara499d05e2011-11-16 19:34:48 +08001505
Wu Fengguangc5c63432011-12-02 10:21:33 -06001506 /*
1507 * In the case of an unresponding NFS server and the NFS dirty
1508 * pages exceeds dirty_thresh, give the other good bdi's a pipe
1509 * to go through, so that tasks on them still remain responsive.
1510 *
1511 * In theory 1 page is enough to keep the comsumer-producer
1512 * pipe going: the flusher cleans 1 page => the task dirties 1
1513 * more page. However bdi_dirty has accounting errors. So use
1514 * the larger and more IO friendly bdi_stat_error.
1515 */
1516 if (bdi_dirty <= bdi_stat_error(bdi))
1517 break;
1518
Jan Kara499d05e2011-11-16 19:34:48 +08001519 if (fatal_signal_pending(current))
1520 break;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001521 }
1522
Wu Fengguang143dfe82010-08-27 18:45:12 -06001523 if (!dirty_exceeded && bdi->dirty_exceeded)
Peter Zijlstra04fbfdc2007-10-16 23:25:50 -07001524 bdi->dirty_exceeded = 0;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001525
1526 if (writeback_in_progress(bdi))
Jens Axboe5b0830c2009-09-23 19:37:09 +02001527 return;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001528
1529 /*
1530 * In laptop mode, we wait until hitting the higher threshold before
1531 * starting background writeout, and then write out all the way down
1532 * to the lower threshold. So slow writers cause minimal disk activity.
1533 *
1534 * In normal mode, we start background writeout at the lower
1535 * background_thresh, to keep the amount of dirty memory low.
1536 */
Wu Fengguang143dfe82010-08-27 18:45:12 -06001537 if (laptop_mode)
1538 return;
1539
1540 if (nr_reclaimable > background_thresh)
Christoph Hellwigc5444192010-06-08 18:15:15 +02001541 bdi_start_background_writeback(bdi);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001542}
1543
Wu Fengguang9d823e82011-06-11 18:10:12 -06001544static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, bdp_ratelimits);
Tejun Heo245b2e72009-06-24 15:13:48 +09001545
Wu Fengguang54848d72011-04-05 13:21:19 -06001546/*
1547 * Normal tasks are throttled by
1548 * loop {
1549 * dirty tsk->nr_dirtied_pause pages;
1550 * take a snap in balance_dirty_pages();
1551 * }
1552 * However there is a worst case. If every task exit immediately when dirtied
1553 * (tsk->nr_dirtied_pause - 1) pages, balance_dirty_pages() will never be
1554 * called to throttle the page dirties. The solution is to save the not yet
1555 * throttled page dirties in dirty_throttle_leaks on task exit and charge them
1556 * randomly into the running tasks. This works well for the above worst case,
1557 * as the new task will pick up and accumulate the old task's leaked dirty
1558 * count and eventually get throttled.
1559 */
1560DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, dirty_throttle_leaks) = 0;
1561
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001562/**
Andrew Mortonfa5a7342006-03-24 03:18:10 -08001563 * balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited_nr - balance dirty memory state
Martin Waitz67be2dd2005-05-01 08:59:26 -07001564 * @mapping: address_space which was dirtied
Martin Waitza5802902006-04-02 13:59:55 +02001565 * @nr_pages_dirtied: number of pages which the caller has just dirtied
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001566 *
1567 * Processes which are dirtying memory should call in here once for each page
1568 * which was newly dirtied. The function will periodically check the system's
1569 * dirty state and will initiate writeback if needed.
1570 *
1571 * On really big machines, get_writeback_state is expensive, so try to avoid
1572 * calling it too often (ratelimiting). But once we're over the dirty memory
1573 * limit we decrease the ratelimiting by a lot, to prevent individual processes
1574 * from overshooting the limit by (ratelimit_pages) each.
1575 */
Andrew Mortonfa5a7342006-03-24 03:18:10 -08001576void balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited_nr(struct address_space *mapping,
1577 unsigned long nr_pages_dirtied)
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001578{
Wu Fengguang36715ce2011-06-11 17:53:57 -06001579 struct backing_dev_info *bdi = mapping->backing_dev_info;
Wu Fengguang9d823e82011-06-11 18:10:12 -06001580 int ratelimit;
1581 int *p;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001582
Wu Fengguang36715ce2011-06-11 17:53:57 -06001583 if (!bdi_cap_account_dirty(bdi))
1584 return;
1585
Wu Fengguang9d823e82011-06-11 18:10:12 -06001586 ratelimit = current->nr_dirtied_pause;
1587 if (bdi->dirty_exceeded)
1588 ratelimit = min(ratelimit, 32 >> (PAGE_SHIFT - 10));
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001589
Andrew Mortonfa5a7342006-03-24 03:18:10 -08001590 preempt_disable();
Wu Fengguang9d823e82011-06-11 18:10:12 -06001591 /*
1592 * This prevents one CPU to accumulate too many dirtied pages without
1593 * calling into balance_dirty_pages(), which can happen when there are
1594 * 1000+ tasks, all of them start dirtying pages at exactly the same
1595 * time, hence all honoured too large initial task->nr_dirtied_pause.
1596 */
Tejun Heo245b2e72009-06-24 15:13:48 +09001597 p = &__get_cpu_var(bdp_ratelimits);
Wu Fengguang9d823e82011-06-11 18:10:12 -06001598 if (unlikely(current->nr_dirtied >= ratelimit))
Andrew Mortonfa5a7342006-03-24 03:18:10 -08001599 *p = 0;
Wu Fengguangd3bc1fe2011-04-14 07:52:37 -06001600 else if (unlikely(*p >= ratelimit_pages)) {
1601 *p = 0;
1602 ratelimit = 0;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001603 }
Wu Fengguang54848d72011-04-05 13:21:19 -06001604 /*
1605 * Pick up the dirtied pages by the exited tasks. This avoids lots of
1606 * short-lived tasks (eg. gcc invocations in a kernel build) escaping
1607 * the dirty throttling and livelock other long-run dirtiers.
1608 */
1609 p = &__get_cpu_var(dirty_throttle_leaks);
1610 if (*p > 0 && current->nr_dirtied < ratelimit) {
1611 nr_pages_dirtied = min(*p, ratelimit - current->nr_dirtied);
1612 *p -= nr_pages_dirtied;
1613 current->nr_dirtied += nr_pages_dirtied;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001614 }
Andrew Mortonfa5a7342006-03-24 03:18:10 -08001615 preempt_enable();
Wu Fengguang9d823e82011-06-11 18:10:12 -06001616
1617 if (unlikely(current->nr_dirtied >= ratelimit))
1618 balance_dirty_pages(mapping, current->nr_dirtied);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001619}
Andrew Mortonfa5a7342006-03-24 03:18:10 -08001620EXPORT_SYMBOL(balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited_nr);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001621
Andrew Morton232ea4d2007-02-28 20:13:21 -08001622void throttle_vm_writeout(gfp_t gfp_mask)
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001623{
David Rientjes364aeb22009-01-06 14:39:29 -08001624 unsigned long background_thresh;
1625 unsigned long dirty_thresh;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001626
1627 for ( ; ; ) {
Wu Fengguang16c40422010-08-11 14:17:39 -07001628 global_dirty_limits(&background_thresh, &dirty_thresh);
Fengguang Wu47a13332012-03-21 16:34:09 -07001629 dirty_thresh = hard_dirty_limit(dirty_thresh);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001630
1631 /*
1632 * Boost the allowable dirty threshold a bit for page
1633 * allocators so they don't get DoS'ed by heavy writers
1634 */
1635 dirty_thresh += dirty_thresh / 10; /* wheeee... */
1636
Christoph Lameterc24f21b2006-06-30 01:55:42 -07001637 if (global_page_state(NR_UNSTABLE_NFS) +
1638 global_page_state(NR_WRITEBACK) <= dirty_thresh)
1639 break;
Jens Axboe8aa7e842009-07-09 14:52:32 +02001640 congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/10);
Fengguang Wu369f2382007-10-16 23:30:45 -07001641
1642 /*
1643 * The caller might hold locks which can prevent IO completion
1644 * or progress in the filesystem. So we cannot just sit here
1645 * waiting for IO to complete.
1646 */
1647 if ((gfp_mask & (__GFP_FS|__GFP_IO)) != (__GFP_FS|__GFP_IO))
1648 break;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001649 }
1650}
1651
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001652/*
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001653 * sysctl handler for /proc/sys/vm/dirty_writeback_centisecs
1654 */
1655int dirty_writeback_centisecs_handler(ctl_table *table, int write,
Alexey Dobriyan8d65af72009-09-23 15:57:19 -07001656 void __user *buffer, size_t *length, loff_t *ppos)
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001657{
Alexey Dobriyan8d65af72009-09-23 15:57:19 -07001658 proc_dointvec(table, write, buffer, length, ppos);
Jens Axboe64231042010-05-21 20:00:35 +02001659 bdi_arm_supers_timer();
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001660 return 0;
1661}
1662
Jens Axboec2c49862010-05-20 09:18:47 +02001663#ifdef CONFIG_BLOCK
Matthew Garrett31373d02010-04-06 14:25:14 +02001664void laptop_mode_timer_fn(unsigned long data)
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001665{
Matthew Garrett31373d02010-04-06 14:25:14 +02001666 struct request_queue *q = (struct request_queue *)data;
1667 int nr_pages = global_page_state(NR_FILE_DIRTY) +
1668 global_page_state(NR_UNSTABLE_NFS);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001669
Matthew Garrett31373d02010-04-06 14:25:14 +02001670 /*
1671 * We want to write everything out, not just down to the dirty
1672 * threshold
1673 */
Matthew Garrett31373d02010-04-06 14:25:14 +02001674 if (bdi_has_dirty_io(&q->backing_dev_info))
Curt Wohlgemuth0e175a12011-10-07 21:54:10 -06001675 bdi_start_writeback(&q->backing_dev_info, nr_pages,
1676 WB_REASON_LAPTOP_TIMER);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001677}
1678
1679/*
1680 * We've spun up the disk and we're in laptop mode: schedule writeback
1681 * of all dirty data a few seconds from now. If the flush is already scheduled
1682 * then push it back - the user is still using the disk.
1683 */
Matthew Garrett31373d02010-04-06 14:25:14 +02001684void laptop_io_completion(struct backing_dev_info *info)
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001685{
Matthew Garrett31373d02010-04-06 14:25:14 +02001686 mod_timer(&info->laptop_mode_wb_timer, jiffies + laptop_mode);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001687}
1688
1689/*
1690 * We're in laptop mode and we've just synced. The sync's writes will have
1691 * caused another writeback to be scheduled by laptop_io_completion.
1692 * Nothing needs to be written back anymore, so we unschedule the writeback.
1693 */
1694void laptop_sync_completion(void)
1695{
Matthew Garrett31373d02010-04-06 14:25:14 +02001696 struct backing_dev_info *bdi;
1697
1698 rcu_read_lock();
1699
1700 list_for_each_entry_rcu(bdi, &bdi_list, bdi_list)
1701 del_timer(&bdi->laptop_mode_wb_timer);
1702
1703 rcu_read_unlock();
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001704}
Jens Axboec2c49862010-05-20 09:18:47 +02001705#endif
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001706
1707/*
1708 * If ratelimit_pages is too high then we can get into dirty-data overload
1709 * if a large number of processes all perform writes at the same time.
1710 * If it is too low then SMP machines will call the (expensive)
1711 * get_writeback_state too often.
1712 *
1713 * Here we set ratelimit_pages to a level which ensures that when all CPUs are
1714 * dirtying in parallel, we cannot go more than 3% (1/32) over the dirty memory
Wu Fengguang9d823e82011-06-11 18:10:12 -06001715 * thresholds.
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001716 */
1717
Chandra Seetharaman2d1d43f2006-09-29 02:01:25 -07001718void writeback_set_ratelimit(void)
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001719{
Wu Fengguang9d823e82011-06-11 18:10:12 -06001720 unsigned long background_thresh;
1721 unsigned long dirty_thresh;
1722 global_dirty_limits(&background_thresh, &dirty_thresh);
1723 ratelimit_pages = dirty_thresh / (num_online_cpus() * 32);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001724 if (ratelimit_pages < 16)
1725 ratelimit_pages = 16;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001726}
1727
Chandra Seetharaman26c21432006-06-27 02:54:10 -07001728static int __cpuinit
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001729ratelimit_handler(struct notifier_block *self, unsigned long u, void *v)
1730{
Chandra Seetharaman2d1d43f2006-09-29 02:01:25 -07001731 writeback_set_ratelimit();
Paul E. McKenneyaa0f0302007-02-10 01:46:37 -08001732 return NOTIFY_DONE;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001733}
1734
Chandra Seetharaman74b85f32006-06-27 02:54:09 -07001735static struct notifier_block __cpuinitdata ratelimit_nb = {
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001736 .notifier_call = ratelimit_handler,
1737 .next = NULL,
1738};
1739
1740/*
Linus Torvaldsdc6e29d2007-01-29 16:37:38 -08001741 * Called early on to tune the page writeback dirty limits.
1742 *
1743 * We used to scale dirty pages according to how total memory
1744 * related to pages that could be allocated for buffers (by
1745 * comparing nr_free_buffer_pages() to vm_total_pages.
1746 *
1747 * However, that was when we used "dirty_ratio" to scale with
1748 * all memory, and we don't do that any more. "dirty_ratio"
1749 * is now applied to total non-HIGHPAGE memory (by subtracting
1750 * totalhigh_pages from vm_total_pages), and as such we can't
1751 * get into the old insane situation any more where we had
1752 * large amounts of dirty pages compared to a small amount of
1753 * non-HIGHMEM memory.
1754 *
1755 * But we might still want to scale the dirty_ratio by how
1756 * much memory the box has..
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001757 */
1758void __init page_writeback_init(void)
1759{
Peter Zijlstra04fbfdc2007-10-16 23:25:50 -07001760 int shift;
1761
Chandra Seetharaman2d1d43f2006-09-29 02:01:25 -07001762 writeback_set_ratelimit();
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001763 register_cpu_notifier(&ratelimit_nb);
Peter Zijlstra04fbfdc2007-10-16 23:25:50 -07001764
1765 shift = calc_period_shift();
1766 prop_descriptor_init(&vm_completions, shift);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001767}
1768
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +01001769/**
Jan Karaf446daa2010-08-09 17:19:12 -07001770 * tag_pages_for_writeback - tag pages to be written by write_cache_pages
1771 * @mapping: address space structure to write
1772 * @start: starting page index
1773 * @end: ending page index (inclusive)
1774 *
1775 * This function scans the page range from @start to @end (inclusive) and tags
1776 * all pages that have DIRTY tag set with a special TOWRITE tag. The idea is
1777 * that write_cache_pages (or whoever calls this function) will then use
1778 * TOWRITE tag to identify pages eligible for writeback. This mechanism is
1779 * used to avoid livelocking of writeback by a process steadily creating new
1780 * dirty pages in the file (thus it is important for this function to be quick
1781 * so that it can tag pages faster than a dirtying process can create them).
1782 */
1783/*
1784 * We tag pages in batches of WRITEBACK_TAG_BATCH to reduce tree_lock latency.
1785 */
Jan Karaf446daa2010-08-09 17:19:12 -07001786void tag_pages_for_writeback(struct address_space *mapping,
1787 pgoff_t start, pgoff_t end)
1788{
Randy Dunlap3c111a02010-08-11 14:17:30 -07001789#define WRITEBACK_TAG_BATCH 4096
Jan Karaf446daa2010-08-09 17:19:12 -07001790 unsigned long tagged;
1791
1792 do {
1793 spin_lock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
1794 tagged = radix_tree_range_tag_if_tagged(&mapping->page_tree,
1795 &start, end, WRITEBACK_TAG_BATCH,
1796 PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY, PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE);
1797 spin_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
1798 WARN_ON_ONCE(tagged > WRITEBACK_TAG_BATCH);
1799 cond_resched();
Jan Karad5ed3a42010-08-19 14:13:33 -07001800 /* We check 'start' to handle wrapping when end == ~0UL */
1801 } while (tagged >= WRITEBACK_TAG_BATCH && start);
Jan Karaf446daa2010-08-09 17:19:12 -07001802}
1803EXPORT_SYMBOL(tag_pages_for_writeback);
1804
1805/**
Miklos Szeredi0ea97182007-05-10 22:22:51 -07001806 * write_cache_pages - walk the list of dirty pages of the given address space and write all of them.
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +01001807 * @mapping: address space structure to write
1808 * @wbc: subtract the number of written pages from *@wbc->nr_to_write
Miklos Szeredi0ea97182007-05-10 22:22:51 -07001809 * @writepage: function called for each page
1810 * @data: data passed to writepage function
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +01001811 *
Miklos Szeredi0ea97182007-05-10 22:22:51 -07001812 * If a page is already under I/O, write_cache_pages() skips it, even
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +01001813 * if it's dirty. This is desirable behaviour for memory-cleaning writeback,
1814 * but it is INCORRECT for data-integrity system calls such as fsync(). fsync()
1815 * and msync() need to guarantee that all the data which was dirty at the time
1816 * the call was made get new I/O started against them. If wbc->sync_mode is
1817 * WB_SYNC_ALL then we were called for data integrity and we must wait for
1818 * existing IO to complete.
Jan Karaf446daa2010-08-09 17:19:12 -07001819 *
1820 * To avoid livelocks (when other process dirties new pages), we first tag
1821 * pages which should be written back with TOWRITE tag and only then start
1822 * writing them. For data-integrity sync we have to be careful so that we do
1823 * not miss some pages (e.g., because some other process has cleared TOWRITE
1824 * tag we set). The rule we follow is that TOWRITE tag can be cleared only
1825 * by the process clearing the DIRTY tag (and submitting the page for IO).
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +01001826 */
Miklos Szeredi0ea97182007-05-10 22:22:51 -07001827int write_cache_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
1828 struct writeback_control *wbc, writepage_t writepage,
1829 void *data)
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +01001830{
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +01001831 int ret = 0;
1832 int done = 0;
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +01001833 struct pagevec pvec;
1834 int nr_pages;
Nick Piggin31a12662009-01-06 14:39:04 -08001835 pgoff_t uninitialized_var(writeback_index);
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +01001836 pgoff_t index;
1837 pgoff_t end; /* Inclusive */
Nick Pigginbd19e012009-01-06 14:39:06 -08001838 pgoff_t done_index;
Nick Piggin31a12662009-01-06 14:39:04 -08001839 int cycled;
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +01001840 int range_whole = 0;
Jan Karaf446daa2010-08-09 17:19:12 -07001841 int tag;
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +01001842
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +01001843 pagevec_init(&pvec, 0);
1844 if (wbc->range_cyclic) {
Nick Piggin31a12662009-01-06 14:39:04 -08001845 writeback_index = mapping->writeback_index; /* prev offset */
1846 index = writeback_index;
1847 if (index == 0)
1848 cycled = 1;
1849 else
1850 cycled = 0;
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +01001851 end = -1;
1852 } else {
1853 index = wbc->range_start >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
1854 end = wbc->range_end >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
1855 if (wbc->range_start == 0 && wbc->range_end == LLONG_MAX)
1856 range_whole = 1;
Nick Piggin31a12662009-01-06 14:39:04 -08001857 cycled = 1; /* ignore range_cyclic tests */
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +01001858 }
Wu Fengguang6e6938b2010-06-06 10:38:15 -06001859 if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL || wbc->tagged_writepages)
Jan Karaf446daa2010-08-09 17:19:12 -07001860 tag = PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE;
1861 else
1862 tag = PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY;
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +01001863retry:
Wu Fengguang6e6938b2010-06-06 10:38:15 -06001864 if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL || wbc->tagged_writepages)
Jan Karaf446daa2010-08-09 17:19:12 -07001865 tag_pages_for_writeback(mapping, index, end);
Nick Pigginbd19e012009-01-06 14:39:06 -08001866 done_index = index;
Nick Piggin5a3d5c92009-01-06 14:39:09 -08001867 while (!done && (index <= end)) {
1868 int i;
1869
Jan Karaf446daa2010-08-09 17:19:12 -07001870 nr_pages = pagevec_lookup_tag(&pvec, mapping, &index, tag,
Nick Piggin5a3d5c92009-01-06 14:39:09 -08001871 min(end - index, (pgoff_t)PAGEVEC_SIZE-1) + 1);
1872 if (nr_pages == 0)
1873 break;
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +01001874
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +01001875 for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) {
1876 struct page *page = pvec.pages[i];
1877
Nick Piggind5482cd2009-01-06 14:39:11 -08001878 /*
1879 * At this point, the page may be truncated or
1880 * invalidated (changing page->mapping to NULL), or
1881 * even swizzled back from swapper_space to tmpfs file
1882 * mapping. However, page->index will not change
1883 * because we have a reference on the page.
1884 */
1885 if (page->index > end) {
1886 /*
1887 * can't be range_cyclic (1st pass) because
1888 * end == -1 in that case.
1889 */
1890 done = 1;
1891 break;
1892 }
1893
Jun'ichi Nomuracf15b072011-03-22 16:33:40 -07001894 done_index = page->index;
Nick Pigginbd19e012009-01-06 14:39:06 -08001895
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +01001896 lock_page(page);
1897
Nick Piggin5a3d5c92009-01-06 14:39:09 -08001898 /*
1899 * Page truncated or invalidated. We can freely skip it
1900 * then, even for data integrity operations: the page
1901 * has disappeared concurrently, so there could be no
1902 * real expectation of this data interity operation
1903 * even if there is now a new, dirty page at the same
1904 * pagecache address.
1905 */
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +01001906 if (unlikely(page->mapping != mapping)) {
Nick Piggin5a3d5c92009-01-06 14:39:09 -08001907continue_unlock:
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +01001908 unlock_page(page);
1909 continue;
1910 }
1911
Nick Piggin515f4a02009-01-06 14:39:10 -08001912 if (!PageDirty(page)) {
1913 /* someone wrote it for us */
1914 goto continue_unlock;
1915 }
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +01001916
Nick Piggin515f4a02009-01-06 14:39:10 -08001917 if (PageWriteback(page)) {
1918 if (wbc->sync_mode != WB_SYNC_NONE)
1919 wait_on_page_writeback(page);
1920 else
1921 goto continue_unlock;
1922 }
1923
1924 BUG_ON(PageWriteback(page));
1925 if (!clear_page_dirty_for_io(page))
Nick Piggin5a3d5c92009-01-06 14:39:09 -08001926 goto continue_unlock;
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +01001927
Dave Chinner9e094382010-07-07 13:24:08 +10001928 trace_wbc_writepage(wbc, mapping->backing_dev_info);
Miklos Szeredi0ea97182007-05-10 22:22:51 -07001929 ret = (*writepage)(page, wbc, data);
Nick Piggin00266772009-01-06 14:39:06 -08001930 if (unlikely(ret)) {
1931 if (ret == AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE) {
1932 unlock_page(page);
1933 ret = 0;
1934 } else {
1935 /*
1936 * done_index is set past this page,
1937 * so media errors will not choke
1938 * background writeout for the entire
1939 * file. This has consequences for
1940 * range_cyclic semantics (ie. it may
1941 * not be suitable for data integrity
1942 * writeout).
1943 */
Jun'ichi Nomuracf15b072011-03-22 16:33:40 -07001944 done_index = page->index + 1;
Nick Piggin00266772009-01-06 14:39:06 -08001945 done = 1;
1946 break;
1947 }
Dave Chinner0b564922010-06-09 10:37:18 +10001948 }
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +01001949
Dave Chinner546a1922010-08-24 11:44:34 +10001950 /*
1951 * We stop writing back only if we are not doing
1952 * integrity sync. In case of integrity sync we have to
1953 * keep going until we have written all the pages
1954 * we tagged for writeback prior to entering this loop.
1955 */
1956 if (--wbc->nr_to_write <= 0 &&
1957 wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
1958 done = 1;
1959 break;
Nick Piggin05fe4782009-01-06 14:39:08 -08001960 }
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +01001961 }
1962 pagevec_release(&pvec);
1963 cond_resched();
1964 }
Nick Piggin3a4c6802009-02-12 04:34:23 +01001965 if (!cycled && !done) {
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +01001966 /*
Nick Piggin31a12662009-01-06 14:39:04 -08001967 * range_cyclic:
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +01001968 * We hit the last page and there is more work to be done: wrap
1969 * back to the start of the file
1970 */
Nick Piggin31a12662009-01-06 14:39:04 -08001971 cycled = 1;
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +01001972 index = 0;
Nick Piggin31a12662009-01-06 14:39:04 -08001973 end = writeback_index - 1;
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +01001974 goto retry;
1975 }
Dave Chinner0b564922010-06-09 10:37:18 +10001976 if (wbc->range_cyclic || (range_whole && wbc->nr_to_write > 0))
1977 mapping->writeback_index = done_index;
Aneesh Kumar K.V06d6cf62008-07-11 19:27:31 -04001978
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +01001979 return ret;
1980}
Miklos Szeredi0ea97182007-05-10 22:22:51 -07001981EXPORT_SYMBOL(write_cache_pages);
1982
1983/*
1984 * Function used by generic_writepages to call the real writepage
1985 * function and set the mapping flags on error
1986 */
1987static int __writepage(struct page *page, struct writeback_control *wbc,
1988 void *data)
1989{
1990 struct address_space *mapping = data;
1991 int ret = mapping->a_ops->writepage(page, wbc);
1992 mapping_set_error(mapping, ret);
1993 return ret;
1994}
1995
1996/**
1997 * generic_writepages - walk the list of dirty pages of the given address space and writepage() all of them.
1998 * @mapping: address space structure to write
1999 * @wbc: subtract the number of written pages from *@wbc->nr_to_write
2000 *
2001 * This is a library function, which implements the writepages()
2002 * address_space_operation.
2003 */
2004int generic_writepages(struct address_space *mapping,
2005 struct writeback_control *wbc)
2006{
Shaohua Li9b6096a2011-03-17 10:47:06 +01002007 struct blk_plug plug;
2008 int ret;
2009
Miklos Szeredi0ea97182007-05-10 22:22:51 -07002010 /* deal with chardevs and other special file */
2011 if (!mapping->a_ops->writepage)
2012 return 0;
2013
Shaohua Li9b6096a2011-03-17 10:47:06 +01002014 blk_start_plug(&plug);
2015 ret = write_cache_pages(mapping, wbc, __writepage, mapping);
2016 blk_finish_plug(&plug);
2017 return ret;
Miklos Szeredi0ea97182007-05-10 22:22:51 -07002018}
David Howells811d7362006-08-29 19:06:09 +01002019
2020EXPORT_SYMBOL(generic_writepages);
2021
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002022int do_writepages(struct address_space *mapping, struct writeback_control *wbc)
2023{
Andrew Morton22905f72005-11-16 15:07:01 -08002024 int ret;
2025
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002026 if (wbc->nr_to_write <= 0)
2027 return 0;
2028 if (mapping->a_ops->writepages)
Peter Zijlstrad08b3852006-09-25 23:30:57 -07002029 ret = mapping->a_ops->writepages(mapping, wbc);
Andrew Morton22905f72005-11-16 15:07:01 -08002030 else
2031 ret = generic_writepages(mapping, wbc);
Andrew Morton22905f72005-11-16 15:07:01 -08002032 return ret;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002033}
2034
2035/**
2036 * write_one_page - write out a single page and optionally wait on I/O
Martin Waitz67be2dd2005-05-01 08:59:26 -07002037 * @page: the page to write
2038 * @wait: if true, wait on writeout
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002039 *
2040 * The page must be locked by the caller and will be unlocked upon return.
2041 *
2042 * write_one_page() returns a negative error code if I/O failed.
2043 */
2044int write_one_page(struct page *page, int wait)
2045{
2046 struct address_space *mapping = page->mapping;
2047 int ret = 0;
2048 struct writeback_control wbc = {
2049 .sync_mode = WB_SYNC_ALL,
2050 .nr_to_write = 1,
2051 };
2052
2053 BUG_ON(!PageLocked(page));
2054
2055 if (wait)
2056 wait_on_page_writeback(page);
2057
2058 if (clear_page_dirty_for_io(page)) {
2059 page_cache_get(page);
2060 ret = mapping->a_ops->writepage(page, &wbc);
2061 if (ret == 0 && wait) {
2062 wait_on_page_writeback(page);
2063 if (PageError(page))
2064 ret = -EIO;
2065 }
2066 page_cache_release(page);
2067 } else {
2068 unlock_page(page);
2069 }
2070 return ret;
2071}
2072EXPORT_SYMBOL(write_one_page);
2073
2074/*
Ken Chen76719322007-02-10 01:43:15 -08002075 * For address_spaces which do not use buffers nor write back.
2076 */
2077int __set_page_dirty_no_writeback(struct page *page)
2078{
2079 if (!PageDirty(page))
Bob Liuc3f0da62011-01-13 15:45:49 -08002080 return !TestSetPageDirty(page);
Ken Chen76719322007-02-10 01:43:15 -08002081 return 0;
2082}
2083
2084/*
Edward Shishkine3a7cca2009-03-31 15:19:39 -07002085 * Helper function for set_page_dirty family.
2086 * NOTE: This relies on being atomic wrt interrupts.
2087 */
2088void account_page_dirtied(struct page *page, struct address_space *mapping)
2089{
2090 if (mapping_cap_account_dirty(mapping)) {
2091 __inc_zone_page_state(page, NR_FILE_DIRTY);
Michael Rubinea941f02010-10-26 14:21:35 -07002092 __inc_zone_page_state(page, NR_DIRTIED);
Edward Shishkine3a7cca2009-03-31 15:19:39 -07002093 __inc_bdi_stat(mapping->backing_dev_info, BDI_RECLAIMABLE);
Wu Fengguangc8e28ce2011-01-23 10:07:47 -06002094 __inc_bdi_stat(mapping->backing_dev_info, BDI_DIRTIED);
Edward Shishkine3a7cca2009-03-31 15:19:39 -07002095 task_io_account_write(PAGE_CACHE_SIZE);
Wu Fengguangd3bc1fe2011-04-14 07:52:37 -06002096 current->nr_dirtied++;
2097 this_cpu_inc(bdp_ratelimits);
Edward Shishkine3a7cca2009-03-31 15:19:39 -07002098 }
2099}
Michael Rubin679ceac2010-08-20 02:31:26 -07002100EXPORT_SYMBOL(account_page_dirtied);
Edward Shishkine3a7cca2009-03-31 15:19:39 -07002101
2102/*
Michael Rubinf629d1c2010-10-26 14:21:33 -07002103 * Helper function for set_page_writeback family.
2104 * NOTE: Unlike account_page_dirtied this does not rely on being atomic
2105 * wrt interrupts.
2106 */
2107void account_page_writeback(struct page *page)
2108{
2109 inc_zone_page_state(page, NR_WRITEBACK);
2110}
2111EXPORT_SYMBOL(account_page_writeback);
2112
2113/*
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002114 * For address_spaces which do not use buffers. Just tag the page as dirty in
2115 * its radix tree.
2116 *
2117 * This is also used when a single buffer is being dirtied: we want to set the
2118 * page dirty in that case, but not all the buffers. This is a "bottom-up"
2119 * dirtying, whereas __set_page_dirty_buffers() is a "top-down" dirtying.
2120 *
Johannes Weiner77ad25b2015-01-08 14:32:18 -08002121 * The caller must ensure this doesn't race with truncation. Most will simply
2122 * hold the page lock, but e.g. zap_pte_range() calls with the page mapped and
2123 * the pte lock held, which also locks out truncat
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002124 */
2125int __set_page_dirty_nobuffers(struct page *page)
2126{
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002127 if (!TestSetPageDirty(page)) {
2128 struct address_space *mapping = page_mapping(page);
KOSAKI Motohiro9259c4b2014-02-06 12:04:24 -08002129 unsigned long flags;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002130
Andrew Morton8c085402006-12-10 02:19:24 -08002131 if (!mapping)
2132 return 1;
2133
KOSAKI Motohiro9259c4b2014-02-06 12:04:24 -08002134 spin_lock_irqsave(&mapping->tree_lock, flags);
Johannes Weiner77ad25b2015-01-08 14:32:18 -08002135 BUG_ON(page_mapping(page) != mapping);
2136 WARN_ON_ONCE(!PagePrivate(page) && !PageUptodate(page));
2137 account_page_dirtied(page, mapping);
2138 radix_tree_tag_set(&mapping->page_tree, page_index(page),
2139 PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY);
KOSAKI Motohiro9259c4b2014-02-06 12:04:24 -08002140 spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mapping->tree_lock, flags);
Andrew Morton8c085402006-12-10 02:19:24 -08002141 if (mapping->host) {
2142 /* !PageAnon && !swapper_space */
2143 __mark_inode_dirty(mapping->host, I_DIRTY_PAGES);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002144 }
Andrew Morton4741c9f2006-03-24 03:18:11 -08002145 return 1;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002146 }
Andrew Morton4741c9f2006-03-24 03:18:11 -08002147 return 0;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002148}
2149EXPORT_SYMBOL(__set_page_dirty_nobuffers);
2150
2151/*
Wu Fengguang2f800fb2011-08-08 15:22:00 -06002152 * Call this whenever redirtying a page, to de-account the dirty counters
2153 * (NR_DIRTIED, BDI_DIRTIED, tsk->nr_dirtied), so that they match the written
2154 * counters (NR_WRITTEN, BDI_WRITTEN) in long term. The mismatches will lead to
2155 * systematic errors in balanced_dirty_ratelimit and the dirty pages position
2156 * control.
2157 */
2158void account_page_redirty(struct page *page)
2159{
2160 struct address_space *mapping = page->mapping;
2161 if (mapping && mapping_cap_account_dirty(mapping)) {
2162 current->nr_dirtied--;
2163 dec_zone_page_state(page, NR_DIRTIED);
2164 dec_bdi_stat(mapping->backing_dev_info, BDI_DIRTIED);
2165 }
2166}
2167EXPORT_SYMBOL(account_page_redirty);
2168
2169/*
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002170 * When a writepage implementation decides that it doesn't want to write this
2171 * page for some reason, it should redirty the locked page via
2172 * redirty_page_for_writepage() and it should then unlock the page and return 0
2173 */
2174int redirty_page_for_writepage(struct writeback_control *wbc, struct page *page)
2175{
2176 wbc->pages_skipped++;
Wu Fengguang2f800fb2011-08-08 15:22:00 -06002177 account_page_redirty(page);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002178 return __set_page_dirty_nobuffers(page);
2179}
2180EXPORT_SYMBOL(redirty_page_for_writepage);
2181
2182/*
Wu Fengguang6746aff2009-09-16 11:50:14 +02002183 * Dirty a page.
2184 *
2185 * For pages with a mapping this should be done under the page lock
2186 * for the benefit of asynchronous memory errors who prefer a consistent
2187 * dirty state. This rule can be broken in some special cases,
2188 * but should be better not to.
2189 *
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002190 * If the mapping doesn't provide a set_page_dirty a_op, then
2191 * just fall through and assume that it wants buffer_heads.
2192 */
Nick Piggin1cf6e7d2009-02-18 14:48:18 -08002193int set_page_dirty(struct page *page)
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002194{
2195 struct address_space *mapping = page_mapping(page);
2196
2197 if (likely(mapping)) {
2198 int (*spd)(struct page *) = mapping->a_ops->set_page_dirty;
Minchan Kim278df9f2011-03-22 16:32:54 -07002199 /*
2200 * readahead/lru_deactivate_page could remain
2201 * PG_readahead/PG_reclaim due to race with end_page_writeback
2202 * About readahead, if the page is written, the flags would be
2203 * reset. So no problem.
2204 * About lru_deactivate_page, if the page is redirty, the flag
2205 * will be reset. So no problem. but if the page is used by readahead
2206 * it will confuse readahead and make it restart the size rampup
2207 * process. But it's a trivial problem.
2208 */
2209 ClearPageReclaim(page);
David Howells93614012006-09-30 20:45:40 +02002210#ifdef CONFIG_BLOCK
2211 if (!spd)
2212 spd = __set_page_dirty_buffers;
2213#endif
2214 return (*spd)(page);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002215 }
Andrew Morton4741c9f2006-03-24 03:18:11 -08002216 if (!PageDirty(page)) {
2217 if (!TestSetPageDirty(page))
2218 return 1;
2219 }
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002220 return 0;
2221}
2222EXPORT_SYMBOL(set_page_dirty);
2223
2224/*
2225 * set_page_dirty() is racy if the caller has no reference against
2226 * page->mapping->host, and if the page is unlocked. This is because another
2227 * CPU could truncate the page off the mapping and then free the mapping.
2228 *
2229 * Usually, the page _is_ locked, or the caller is a user-space process which
2230 * holds a reference on the inode by having an open file.
2231 *
2232 * In other cases, the page should be locked before running set_page_dirty().
2233 */
2234int set_page_dirty_lock(struct page *page)
2235{
2236 int ret;
2237
Jens Axboe7eaceac2011-03-10 08:52:07 +01002238 lock_page(page);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002239 ret = set_page_dirty(page);
2240 unlock_page(page);
2241 return ret;
2242}
2243EXPORT_SYMBOL(set_page_dirty_lock);
2244
2245/*
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002246 * Clear a page's dirty flag, while caring for dirty memory accounting.
2247 * Returns true if the page was previously dirty.
2248 *
2249 * This is for preparing to put the page under writeout. We leave the page
2250 * tagged as dirty in the radix tree so that a concurrent write-for-sync
2251 * can discover it via a PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY walk. The ->writepage
2252 * implementation will run either set_page_writeback() or set_page_dirty(),
2253 * at which stage we bring the page's dirty flag and radix-tree dirty tag
2254 * back into sync.
2255 *
2256 * This incoherency between the page's dirty flag and radix-tree tag is
2257 * unfortunate, but it only exists while the page is locked.
2258 */
2259int clear_page_dirty_for_io(struct page *page)
2260{
2261 struct address_space *mapping = page_mapping(page);
2262
Nick Piggin79352892007-07-19 01:47:22 -07002263 BUG_ON(!PageLocked(page));
2264
Linus Torvalds7658cc22006-12-29 10:00:58 -08002265 if (mapping && mapping_cap_account_dirty(mapping)) {
2266 /*
2267 * Yes, Virginia, this is indeed insane.
2268 *
2269 * We use this sequence to make sure that
2270 * (a) we account for dirty stats properly
2271 * (b) we tell the low-level filesystem to
2272 * mark the whole page dirty if it was
2273 * dirty in a pagetable. Only to then
2274 * (c) clean the page again and return 1 to
2275 * cause the writeback.
2276 *
2277 * This way we avoid all nasty races with the
2278 * dirty bit in multiple places and clearing
2279 * them concurrently from different threads.
2280 *
2281 * Note! Normally the "set_page_dirty(page)"
2282 * has no effect on the actual dirty bit - since
2283 * that will already usually be set. But we
2284 * need the side effects, and it can help us
2285 * avoid races.
2286 *
2287 * We basically use the page "master dirty bit"
2288 * as a serialization point for all the different
2289 * threads doing their things.
Linus Torvalds7658cc22006-12-29 10:00:58 -08002290 */
2291 if (page_mkclean(page))
2292 set_page_dirty(page);
Nick Piggin79352892007-07-19 01:47:22 -07002293 /*
2294 * We carefully synchronise fault handlers against
2295 * installing a dirty pte and marking the page dirty
Johannes Weiner77ad25b2015-01-08 14:32:18 -08002296 * at this point. We do this by having them hold the
2297 * page lock while dirtying the page, and pages are
2298 * always locked coming in here, so we get the desired
2299 * exclusion.
Nick Piggin79352892007-07-19 01:47:22 -07002300 */
Linus Torvalds7658cc22006-12-29 10:00:58 -08002301 if (TestClearPageDirty(page)) {
Andrew Morton8c085402006-12-10 02:19:24 -08002302 dec_zone_page_state(page, NR_FILE_DIRTY);
Peter Zijlstrac9e51e42007-10-16 23:25:47 -07002303 dec_bdi_stat(mapping->backing_dev_info,
2304 BDI_RECLAIMABLE);
Linus Torvalds7658cc22006-12-29 10:00:58 -08002305 return 1;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002306 }
Linus Torvalds7658cc22006-12-29 10:00:58 -08002307 return 0;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002308 }
Linus Torvalds7658cc22006-12-29 10:00:58 -08002309 return TestClearPageDirty(page);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002310}
Hans Reiser58bb01a2005-11-18 01:10:53 -08002311EXPORT_SYMBOL(clear_page_dirty_for_io);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002312
2313int test_clear_page_writeback(struct page *page)
2314{
2315 struct address_space *mapping = page_mapping(page);
2316 int ret;
2317
2318 if (mapping) {
Peter Zijlstra69cb51d2007-10-16 23:25:48 -07002319 struct backing_dev_info *bdi = mapping->backing_dev_info;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002320 unsigned long flags;
2321
Nick Piggin19fd6232008-07-25 19:45:32 -07002322 spin_lock_irqsave(&mapping->tree_lock, flags);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002323 ret = TestClearPageWriteback(page);
Peter Zijlstra69cb51d2007-10-16 23:25:48 -07002324 if (ret) {
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002325 radix_tree_tag_clear(&mapping->page_tree,
2326 page_index(page),
2327 PAGECACHE_TAG_WRITEBACK);
Miklos Szeredie4ad08f2008-04-30 00:54:37 -07002328 if (bdi_cap_account_writeback(bdi)) {
Peter Zijlstra69cb51d2007-10-16 23:25:48 -07002329 __dec_bdi_stat(bdi, BDI_WRITEBACK);
Peter Zijlstra04fbfdc2007-10-16 23:25:50 -07002330 __bdi_writeout_inc(bdi);
2331 }
Peter Zijlstra69cb51d2007-10-16 23:25:48 -07002332 }
Nick Piggin19fd6232008-07-25 19:45:32 -07002333 spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mapping->tree_lock, flags);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002334 } else {
2335 ret = TestClearPageWriteback(page);
2336 }
Wu Fengguang99b12e32011-07-25 17:12:37 -07002337 if (ret) {
Andrew Mortond688abf2007-07-19 01:49:17 -07002338 dec_zone_page_state(page, NR_WRITEBACK);
Wu Fengguang99b12e32011-07-25 17:12:37 -07002339 inc_zone_page_state(page, NR_WRITTEN);
2340 }
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002341 return ret;
2342}
2343
2344int test_set_page_writeback(struct page *page)
2345{
2346 struct address_space *mapping = page_mapping(page);
2347 int ret;
2348
2349 if (mapping) {
Peter Zijlstra69cb51d2007-10-16 23:25:48 -07002350 struct backing_dev_info *bdi = mapping->backing_dev_info;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002351 unsigned long flags;
2352
Nick Piggin19fd6232008-07-25 19:45:32 -07002353 spin_lock_irqsave(&mapping->tree_lock, flags);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002354 ret = TestSetPageWriteback(page);
Peter Zijlstra69cb51d2007-10-16 23:25:48 -07002355 if (!ret) {
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002356 radix_tree_tag_set(&mapping->page_tree,
2357 page_index(page),
2358 PAGECACHE_TAG_WRITEBACK);
Miklos Szeredie4ad08f2008-04-30 00:54:37 -07002359 if (bdi_cap_account_writeback(bdi))
Peter Zijlstra69cb51d2007-10-16 23:25:48 -07002360 __inc_bdi_stat(bdi, BDI_WRITEBACK);
2361 }
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002362 if (!PageDirty(page))
2363 radix_tree_tag_clear(&mapping->page_tree,
2364 page_index(page),
2365 PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY);
Jan Karaf446daa2010-08-09 17:19:12 -07002366 radix_tree_tag_clear(&mapping->page_tree,
2367 page_index(page),
2368 PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE);
Nick Piggin19fd6232008-07-25 19:45:32 -07002369 spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mapping->tree_lock, flags);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002370 } else {
2371 ret = TestSetPageWriteback(page);
2372 }
Andrew Mortond688abf2007-07-19 01:49:17 -07002373 if (!ret)
Michael Rubinf629d1c2010-10-26 14:21:33 -07002374 account_page_writeback(page);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002375 return ret;
2376
2377}
2378EXPORT_SYMBOL(test_set_page_writeback);
2379
2380/*
Nick Piggin00128182007-10-16 01:24:40 -07002381 * Return true if any of the pages in the mapping are marked with the
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002382 * passed tag.
2383 */
2384int mapping_tagged(struct address_space *mapping, int tag)
2385{
Konstantin Khlebnikov72c47832011-07-25 17:12:31 -07002386 return radix_tree_tagged(&mapping->page_tree, tag);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07002387}
2388EXPORT_SYMBOL(mapping_tagged);