| /* |
| * Copyright (C) 2014 The Android Open Source Project |
| * |
| * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); |
| * you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. |
| * You may obtain a copy of the License at |
| * |
| * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 |
| * |
| * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software |
| * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, |
| * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. |
| * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and |
| * limitations under the License. |
| */ |
| |
| #include "base/arena_containers.h" |
| #include "bounds_check_elimination.h" |
| #include "nodes.h" |
| |
| namespace art { |
| |
| class MonotonicValueRange; |
| |
| /** |
| * A value bound is represented as a pair of value and constant, |
| * e.g. array.length - 1. |
| */ |
| class ValueBound : public ValueObject { |
| public: |
| ValueBound(HInstruction* instruction, int32_t constant) { |
| if (instruction != nullptr && instruction->IsIntConstant()) { |
| // Normalize ValueBound with constant instruction. |
| int32_t instr_const = instruction->AsIntConstant()->GetValue(); |
| if (!WouldAddOverflowOrUnderflow(instr_const, constant)) { |
| instruction_ = nullptr; |
| constant_ = instr_const + constant; |
| return; |
| } |
| } |
| instruction_ = instruction; |
| constant_ = constant; |
| } |
| |
| // Return whether (left + right) overflows or underflows. |
| static bool WouldAddOverflowOrUnderflow(int32_t left, int32_t right) { |
| if (right == 0) { |
| return false; |
| } |
| if ((right > 0) && (left <= INT_MAX - right)) { |
| // No overflow. |
| return false; |
| } |
| if ((right < 0) && (left >= INT_MIN - right)) { |
| // No underflow. |
| return false; |
| } |
| return true; |
| } |
| |
| static bool IsAddOrSubAConstant(HInstruction* instruction, |
| HInstruction** left_instruction, |
| int* right_constant) { |
| if (instruction->IsAdd() || instruction->IsSub()) { |
| HBinaryOperation* bin_op = instruction->AsBinaryOperation(); |
| HInstruction* left = bin_op->GetLeft(); |
| HInstruction* right = bin_op->GetRight(); |
| if (right->IsIntConstant()) { |
| *left_instruction = left; |
| int32_t c = right->AsIntConstant()->GetValue(); |
| *right_constant = instruction->IsAdd() ? c : -c; |
| return true; |
| } |
| } |
| *left_instruction = nullptr; |
| *right_constant = 0; |
| return false; |
| } |
| |
| // Try to detect useful value bound format from an instruction, e.g. |
| // a constant or array length related value. |
| static ValueBound DetectValueBoundFromValue(HInstruction* instruction, bool* found) { |
| DCHECK(instruction != nullptr); |
| if (instruction->IsIntConstant()) { |
| *found = true; |
| return ValueBound(nullptr, instruction->AsIntConstant()->GetValue()); |
| } |
| |
| if (instruction->IsArrayLength()) { |
| *found = true; |
| return ValueBound(instruction, 0); |
| } |
| // Try to detect (array.length + c) format. |
| HInstruction *left; |
| int32_t right; |
| if (IsAddOrSubAConstant(instruction, &left, &right)) { |
| if (left->IsArrayLength()) { |
| *found = true; |
| return ValueBound(left, right); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| // No useful bound detected. |
| *found = false; |
| return ValueBound::Max(); |
| } |
| |
| HInstruction* GetInstruction() const { return instruction_; } |
| int32_t GetConstant() const { return constant_; } |
| |
| bool IsRelatedToArrayLength() const { |
| // Some bounds are created with HNewArray* as the instruction instead |
| // of HArrayLength*. They are treated the same. |
| return (instruction_ != nullptr) && |
| (instruction_->IsArrayLength() || instruction_->IsNewArray()); |
| } |
| |
| bool IsConstant() const { |
| return instruction_ == nullptr; |
| } |
| |
| static ValueBound Min() { return ValueBound(nullptr, INT_MIN); } |
| static ValueBound Max() { return ValueBound(nullptr, INT_MAX); } |
| |
| bool Equals(ValueBound bound) const { |
| return instruction_ == bound.instruction_ && constant_ == bound.constant_; |
| } |
| |
| static HInstruction* FromArrayLengthToNewArrayIfPossible(HInstruction* instruction) { |
| // Null check on the NewArray should have been eliminated by instruction |
| // simplifier already. |
| if (instruction->IsArrayLength() && instruction->InputAt(0)->IsNewArray()) { |
| return instruction->InputAt(0)->AsNewArray(); |
| } |
| return instruction; |
| } |
| |
| static bool Equal(HInstruction* instruction1, HInstruction* instruction2) { |
| if (instruction1 == instruction2) { |
| return true; |
| } |
| |
| if (instruction1 == nullptr || instruction2 == nullptr) { |
| return false; |
| } |
| |
| // Some bounds are created with HNewArray* as the instruction instead |
| // of HArrayLength*. They are treated the same. |
| instruction1 = FromArrayLengthToNewArrayIfPossible(instruction1); |
| instruction2 = FromArrayLengthToNewArrayIfPossible(instruction2); |
| return instruction1 == instruction2; |
| } |
| |
| // Returns if it's certain this->bound >= `bound`. |
| bool GreaterThanOrEqualTo(ValueBound bound) const { |
| if (Equal(instruction_, bound.instruction_)) { |
| return constant_ >= bound.constant_; |
| } |
| // Not comparable. Just return false. |
| return false; |
| } |
| |
| // Returns if it's certain this->bound <= `bound`. |
| bool LessThanOrEqualTo(ValueBound bound) const { |
| if (Equal(instruction_, bound.instruction_)) { |
| return constant_ <= bound.constant_; |
| } |
| // Not comparable. Just return false. |
| return false; |
| } |
| |
| // Try to narrow lower bound. Returns the greatest of the two if possible. |
| // Pick one if they are not comparable. |
| static ValueBound NarrowLowerBound(ValueBound bound1, ValueBound bound2) { |
| if (bound1.GreaterThanOrEqualTo(bound2)) { |
| return bound1; |
| } |
| if (bound2.GreaterThanOrEqualTo(bound1)) { |
| return bound2; |
| } |
| |
| // Not comparable. Just pick one. We may lose some info, but that's ok. |
| // Favor constant as lower bound. |
| return bound1.IsConstant() ? bound1 : bound2; |
| } |
| |
| // Try to narrow upper bound. Returns the lowest of the two if possible. |
| // Pick one if they are not comparable. |
| static ValueBound NarrowUpperBound(ValueBound bound1, ValueBound bound2) { |
| if (bound1.LessThanOrEqualTo(bound2)) { |
| return bound1; |
| } |
| if (bound2.LessThanOrEqualTo(bound1)) { |
| return bound2; |
| } |
| |
| // Not comparable. Just pick one. We may lose some info, but that's ok. |
| // Favor array length as upper bound. |
| return bound1.IsRelatedToArrayLength() ? bound1 : bound2; |
| } |
| |
| // Add a constant to a ValueBound. |
| // `overflow` or `underflow` will return whether the resulting bound may |
| // overflow or underflow an int. |
| ValueBound Add(int32_t c, bool* overflow, bool* underflow) const { |
| *overflow = *underflow = false; |
| if (c == 0) { |
| return *this; |
| } |
| |
| int32_t new_constant; |
| if (c > 0) { |
| if (constant_ > INT_MAX - c) { |
| *overflow = true; |
| return Max(); |
| } |
| |
| new_constant = constant_ + c; |
| // (array.length + non-positive-constant) won't overflow an int. |
| if (IsConstant() || (IsRelatedToArrayLength() && new_constant <= 0)) { |
| return ValueBound(instruction_, new_constant); |
| } |
| // Be conservative. |
| *overflow = true; |
| return Max(); |
| } else { |
| if (constant_ < INT_MIN - c) { |
| *underflow = true; |
| return Min(); |
| } |
| |
| new_constant = constant_ + c; |
| // Regardless of the value new_constant, (array.length+new_constant) will |
| // never underflow since array.length is no less than 0. |
| if (IsConstant() || IsRelatedToArrayLength()) { |
| return ValueBound(instruction_, new_constant); |
| } |
| // Be conservative. |
| *underflow = true; |
| return Min(); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| private: |
| HInstruction* instruction_; |
| int32_t constant_; |
| }; |
| |
| // Collect array access data for a loop. |
| // TODO: make it work for multiple arrays inside the loop. |
| class ArrayAccessInsideLoopFinder : public ValueObject { |
| public: |
| explicit ArrayAccessInsideLoopFinder(HInstruction* induction_variable) |
| : induction_variable_(induction_variable), |
| found_array_length_(nullptr), |
| offset_low_(INT_MAX), |
| offset_high_(INT_MIN) { |
| Run(); |
| } |
| |
| HArrayLength* GetFoundArrayLength() const { return found_array_length_; } |
| bool HasFoundArrayLength() const { return found_array_length_ != nullptr; } |
| int32_t GetOffsetLow() const { return offset_low_; } |
| int32_t GetOffsetHigh() const { return offset_high_; } |
| |
| // Returns if `block` that is in loop_info may exit the loop, unless it's |
| // the loop header for loop_info. |
| static bool EarlyExit(HBasicBlock* block, HLoopInformation* loop_info) { |
| DCHECK(loop_info->Contains(*block)); |
| if (block == loop_info->GetHeader()) { |
| // Loop header of loop_info. Exiting loop is normal. |
| return false; |
| } |
| const GrowableArray<HBasicBlock*> successors = block->GetSuccessors(); |
| for (size_t i = 0; i < successors.Size(); i++) { |
| if (!loop_info->Contains(*successors.Get(i))) { |
| // One of the successors exits the loop. |
| return true; |
| } |
| } |
| return false; |
| } |
| |
| void Run() { |
| HLoopInformation* loop_info = induction_variable_->GetBlock()->GetLoopInformation(); |
| // Must be simplified loop. |
| DCHECK_EQ(loop_info->GetBackEdges().Size(), 1U); |
| for (HBlocksInLoopIterator it_loop(*loop_info); !it_loop.Done(); it_loop.Advance()) { |
| HBasicBlock* block = it_loop.Current(); |
| DCHECK(block->IsInLoop()); |
| HBasicBlock* back_edge = loop_info->GetBackEdges().Get(0); |
| if (!block->Dominates(back_edge)) { |
| // In order not to trigger deoptimization unnecessarily, make sure |
| // that all array accesses collected are really executed in the loop. |
| // For array accesses in a branch inside the loop, don't collect the |
| // access. The bounds check in that branch might not be eliminated. |
| continue; |
| } |
| if (EarlyExit(block, loop_info)) { |
| // If the loop body can exit loop (like break, return, etc.), it's not guaranteed |
| // that the loop will loop through the full monotonic value range from |
| // initial_ to end_. So adding deoptimization might be too aggressive and can |
| // trigger deoptimization unnecessarily even if the loop won't actually throw |
| // AIOOBE. Otherwise, the loop induction variable is going to cover the full |
| // monotonic value range from initial_ to end_, and deoptimizations are added |
| // iff the loop will throw AIOOBE. |
| found_array_length_ = nullptr; |
| return; |
| } |
| for (HInstruction* instruction = block->GetFirstInstruction(); |
| instruction != nullptr; |
| instruction = instruction->GetNext()) { |
| if (!instruction->IsArrayGet() && !instruction->IsArraySet()) { |
| continue; |
| } |
| HInstruction* index = instruction->InputAt(1); |
| if (!index->IsBoundsCheck()) { |
| continue; |
| } |
| |
| HArrayLength* array_length = index->InputAt(1)->AsArrayLength(); |
| if (array_length == nullptr) { |
| DCHECK(index->InputAt(1)->IsIntConstant()); |
| // TODO: may optimize for constant case. |
| continue; |
| } |
| |
| HInstruction* array = array_length->InputAt(0); |
| if (array->IsNullCheck()) { |
| array = array->AsNullCheck()->InputAt(0); |
| } |
| if (loop_info->Contains(*array->GetBlock())) { |
| // Array is defined inside the loop. Skip. |
| continue; |
| } |
| |
| if (found_array_length_ != nullptr && found_array_length_ != array_length) { |
| // There is already access for another array recorded for the loop. |
| // TODO: handle multiple arrays. |
| continue; |
| } |
| |
| index = index->AsBoundsCheck()->InputAt(0); |
| HInstruction* left = index; |
| int32_t right = 0; |
| if (left == induction_variable_ || |
| (ValueBound::IsAddOrSubAConstant(index, &left, &right) && |
| left == induction_variable_)) { |
| // For patterns like array[i] or array[i + 2]. |
| if (right < offset_low_) { |
| offset_low_ = right; |
| } |
| if (right > offset_high_) { |
| offset_high_ = right; |
| } |
| } else { |
| // Access not in induction_variable/(induction_variable_ + constant) |
| // format. Skip. |
| continue; |
| } |
| // Record this array. |
| found_array_length_ = array_length; |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| |
| private: |
| // The instruction that corresponds to a MonotonicValueRange. |
| HInstruction* induction_variable_; |
| |
| // The array length of the array that's accessed inside the loop. |
| HArrayLength* found_array_length_; |
| |
| // The lowest and highest constant offsets relative to induction variable |
| // instruction_ in all array accesses. |
| // If array access are: array[i-1], array[i], array[i+1], |
| // offset_low_ is -1 and offset_high is 1. |
| int32_t offset_low_; |
| int32_t offset_high_; |
| |
| DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN(ArrayAccessInsideLoopFinder); |
| }; |
| |
| /** |
| * Represent a range of lower bound and upper bound, both being inclusive. |
| * Currently a ValueRange may be generated as a result of the following: |
| * comparisons related to array bounds, array bounds check, add/sub on top |
| * of an existing value range, NewArray or a loop phi corresponding to an |
| * incrementing/decrementing array index (MonotonicValueRange). |
| */ |
| class ValueRange : public ArenaObject<kArenaAllocMisc> { |
| public: |
| ValueRange(ArenaAllocator* allocator, ValueBound lower, ValueBound upper) |
| : allocator_(allocator), lower_(lower), upper_(upper) {} |
| |
| virtual ~ValueRange() {} |
| |
| virtual MonotonicValueRange* AsMonotonicValueRange() { return nullptr; } |
| bool IsMonotonicValueRange() { |
| return AsMonotonicValueRange() != nullptr; |
| } |
| |
| ArenaAllocator* GetAllocator() const { return allocator_; } |
| ValueBound GetLower() const { return lower_; } |
| ValueBound GetUpper() const { return upper_; } |
| |
| // If it's certain that this value range fits in other_range. |
| virtual bool FitsIn(ValueRange* other_range) const { |
| if (other_range == nullptr) { |
| return true; |
| } |
| DCHECK(!other_range->IsMonotonicValueRange()); |
| return lower_.GreaterThanOrEqualTo(other_range->lower_) && |
| upper_.LessThanOrEqualTo(other_range->upper_); |
| } |
| |
| // Returns the intersection of this and range. |
| // If it's not possible to do intersection because some |
| // bounds are not comparable, it's ok to pick either bound. |
| virtual ValueRange* Narrow(ValueRange* range) { |
| if (range == nullptr) { |
| return this; |
| } |
| |
| if (range->IsMonotonicValueRange()) { |
| return this; |
| } |
| |
| return new (allocator_) ValueRange( |
| allocator_, |
| ValueBound::NarrowLowerBound(lower_, range->lower_), |
| ValueBound::NarrowUpperBound(upper_, range->upper_)); |
| } |
| |
| // Shift a range by a constant. |
| ValueRange* Add(int32_t constant) const { |
| bool overflow, underflow; |
| ValueBound lower = lower_.Add(constant, &overflow, &underflow); |
| if (underflow) { |
| // Lower bound underflow will wrap around to positive values |
| // and invalidate the upper bound. |
| return nullptr; |
| } |
| ValueBound upper = upper_.Add(constant, &overflow, &underflow); |
| if (overflow) { |
| // Upper bound overflow will wrap around to negative values |
| // and invalidate the lower bound. |
| return nullptr; |
| } |
| return new (allocator_) ValueRange(allocator_, lower, upper); |
| } |
| |
| private: |
| ArenaAllocator* const allocator_; |
| const ValueBound lower_; // inclusive |
| const ValueBound upper_; // inclusive |
| |
| DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN(ValueRange); |
| }; |
| |
| /** |
| * A monotonically incrementing/decrementing value range, e.g. |
| * the variable i in "for (int i=0; i<array.length; i++)". |
| * Special care needs to be taken to account for overflow/underflow |
| * of such value ranges. |
| */ |
| class MonotonicValueRange : public ValueRange { |
| public: |
| MonotonicValueRange(ArenaAllocator* allocator, |
| HPhi* induction_variable, |
| HInstruction* initial, |
| int32_t increment, |
| ValueBound bound) |
| // To be conservative, give it full range [INT_MIN, INT_MAX] in case it's |
| // used as a regular value range, due to possible overflow/underflow. |
| : ValueRange(allocator, ValueBound::Min(), ValueBound::Max()), |
| induction_variable_(induction_variable), |
| initial_(initial), |
| end_(nullptr), |
| inclusive_(false), |
| increment_(increment), |
| bound_(bound) {} |
| |
| virtual ~MonotonicValueRange() {} |
| |
| HInstruction* GetInductionVariable() const { return induction_variable_; } |
| int32_t GetIncrement() const { return increment_; } |
| ValueBound GetBound() const { return bound_; } |
| void SetEnd(HInstruction* end) { end_ = end; } |
| void SetInclusive(bool inclusive) { inclusive_ = inclusive; } |
| HBasicBlock* GetLoopHead() const { |
| DCHECK(induction_variable_->GetBlock()->IsLoopHeader()); |
| return induction_variable_->GetBlock(); |
| } |
| |
| MonotonicValueRange* AsMonotonicValueRange() OVERRIDE { return this; } |
| |
| // If it's certain that this value range fits in other_range. |
| bool FitsIn(ValueRange* other_range) const OVERRIDE { |
| if (other_range == nullptr) { |
| return true; |
| } |
| DCHECK(!other_range->IsMonotonicValueRange()); |
| return false; |
| } |
| |
| // Try to narrow this MonotonicValueRange given another range. |
| // Ideally it will return a normal ValueRange. But due to |
| // possible overflow/underflow, that may not be possible. |
| ValueRange* Narrow(ValueRange* range) OVERRIDE { |
| if (range == nullptr) { |
| return this; |
| } |
| DCHECK(!range->IsMonotonicValueRange()); |
| |
| if (increment_ > 0) { |
| // Monotonically increasing. |
| ValueBound lower = ValueBound::NarrowLowerBound(bound_, range->GetLower()); |
| if (!lower.IsConstant() || lower.GetConstant() == INT_MIN) { |
| // Lower bound isn't useful. Leave it to deoptimization. |
| return this; |
| } |
| |
| // We currently conservatively assume max array length is INT_MAX. If we can |
| // make assumptions about the max array length, e.g. due to the max heap size, |
| // divided by the element size (such as 4 bytes for each integer array), we can |
| // lower this number and rule out some possible overflows. |
| int32_t max_array_len = INT_MAX; |
| |
| // max possible integer value of range's upper value. |
| int32_t upper = INT_MAX; |
| // Try to lower upper. |
| ValueBound upper_bound = range->GetUpper(); |
| if (upper_bound.IsConstant()) { |
| upper = upper_bound.GetConstant(); |
| } else if (upper_bound.IsRelatedToArrayLength() && upper_bound.GetConstant() <= 0) { |
| // Normal case. e.g. <= array.length - 1. |
| upper = max_array_len + upper_bound.GetConstant(); |
| } |
| |
| // If we can prove for the last number in sequence of initial_, |
| // initial_ + increment_, initial_ + 2 x increment_, ... |
| // that's <= upper, (last_num_in_sequence + increment_) doesn't trigger overflow, |
| // then this MonoticValueRange is narrowed to a normal value range. |
| |
| // Be conservative first, assume last number in the sequence hits upper. |
| int32_t last_num_in_sequence = upper; |
| if (initial_->IsIntConstant()) { |
| int32_t initial_constant = initial_->AsIntConstant()->GetValue(); |
| if (upper <= initial_constant) { |
| last_num_in_sequence = upper; |
| } else { |
| // Cast to int64_t for the substraction part to avoid int32_t overflow. |
| last_num_in_sequence = initial_constant + |
| ((int64_t)upper - (int64_t)initial_constant) / increment_ * increment_; |
| } |
| } |
| if (last_num_in_sequence <= INT_MAX - increment_) { |
| // No overflow. The sequence will be stopped by the upper bound test as expected. |
| return new (GetAllocator()) ValueRange(GetAllocator(), lower, range->GetUpper()); |
| } |
| |
| // There might be overflow. Give up narrowing. |
| return this; |
| } else { |
| DCHECK_NE(increment_, 0); |
| // Monotonically decreasing. |
| ValueBound upper = ValueBound::NarrowUpperBound(bound_, range->GetUpper()); |
| if ((!upper.IsConstant() || upper.GetConstant() == INT_MAX) && |
| !upper.IsRelatedToArrayLength()) { |
| // Upper bound isn't useful. Leave it to deoptimization. |
| return this; |
| } |
| |
| // Need to take care of underflow. Try to prove underflow won't happen |
| // for common cases. |
| if (range->GetLower().IsConstant()) { |
| int32_t constant = range->GetLower().GetConstant(); |
| if (constant >= INT_MIN - increment_) { |
| return new (GetAllocator()) ValueRange(GetAllocator(), range->GetLower(), upper); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| // For non-constant lower bound, just assume might be underflow. Give up narrowing. |
| return this; |
| } |
| } |
| |
| // Returns true if adding a (constant >= value) check for deoptimization |
| // is allowed and will benefit compiled code. |
| bool CanAddDeoptimizationConstant(HInstruction* value, |
| int32_t constant, |
| bool* is_proven) { |
| *is_proven = false; |
| // See if we can prove the relationship first. |
| if (value->IsIntConstant()) { |
| if (value->AsIntConstant()->GetValue() >= constant) { |
| // Already true. |
| *is_proven = true; |
| return true; |
| } else { |
| // May throw exception. Don't add deoptimization. |
| // Keep bounds checks in the loops. |
| return false; |
| } |
| } |
| // Can benefit from deoptimization. |
| return true; |
| } |
| |
| // Adds a check that (value >= constant), and HDeoptimize otherwise. |
| void AddDeoptimizationConstant(HInstruction* value, |
| int32_t constant) { |
| HBasicBlock* block = induction_variable_->GetBlock(); |
| DCHECK(block->IsLoopHeader()); |
| HGraph* graph = block->GetGraph(); |
| HBasicBlock* pre_header = block->GetLoopInformation()->GetPreHeader(); |
| HSuspendCheck* suspend_check = block->GetLoopInformation()->GetSuspendCheck(); |
| HIntConstant* const_instr = graph->GetIntConstant(constant); |
| HCondition* cond = new (graph->GetArena()) HLessThan(value, const_instr); |
| HDeoptimize* deoptimize = new (graph->GetArena()) |
| HDeoptimize(cond, suspend_check->GetDexPc()); |
| pre_header->InsertInstructionBefore(cond, pre_header->GetLastInstruction()); |
| pre_header->InsertInstructionBefore(deoptimize, pre_header->GetLastInstruction()); |
| deoptimize->CopyEnvironmentFromWithLoopPhiAdjustment( |
| suspend_check->GetEnvironment(), block); |
| } |
| |
| // Returns true if adding a (value <= array_length + offset) check for deoptimization |
| // is allowed and will benefit compiled code. |
| bool CanAddDeoptimizationArrayLength(HInstruction* value, |
| HArrayLength* array_length, |
| int32_t offset, |
| bool* is_proven) { |
| *is_proven = false; |
| if (offset > 0) { |
| // There might be overflow issue. |
| // TODO: handle this, possibly with some distance relationship between |
| // offset_low and offset_high, or using another deoptimization to make |
| // sure (array_length + offset) doesn't overflow. |
| return false; |
| } |
| |
| // See if we can prove the relationship first. |
| if (value == array_length) { |
| if (offset >= 0) { |
| // Already true. |
| *is_proven = true; |
| return true; |
| } else { |
| // May throw exception. Don't add deoptimization. |
| // Keep bounds checks in the loops. |
| return false; |
| } |
| } |
| // Can benefit from deoptimization. |
| return true; |
| } |
| |
| // Adds a check that (value <= array_length + offset), and HDeoptimize otherwise. |
| void AddDeoptimizationArrayLength(HInstruction* value, |
| HArrayLength* array_length, |
| int32_t offset) { |
| HBasicBlock* block = induction_variable_->GetBlock(); |
| DCHECK(block->IsLoopHeader()); |
| HGraph* graph = block->GetGraph(); |
| HBasicBlock* pre_header = block->GetLoopInformation()->GetPreHeader(); |
| HSuspendCheck* suspend_check = block->GetLoopInformation()->GetSuspendCheck(); |
| |
| // We may need to hoist null-check and array_length out of loop first. |
| if (!array_length->GetBlock()->Dominates(pre_header)) { |
| HInstruction* array = array_length->InputAt(0); |
| HNullCheck* null_check = array->AsNullCheck(); |
| if (null_check != nullptr) { |
| array = null_check->InputAt(0); |
| } |
| // We've already made sure array is defined before the loop when collecting |
| // array accesses for the loop. |
| DCHECK(array->GetBlock()->Dominates(pre_header)); |
| if (null_check != nullptr && !null_check->GetBlock()->Dominates(pre_header)) { |
| // Hoist null check out of loop with a deoptimization. |
| HNullConstant* null_constant = graph->GetNullConstant(); |
| HCondition* null_check_cond = new (graph->GetArena()) HEqual(array, null_constant); |
| // TODO: for one dex_pc, share the same deoptimization slow path. |
| HDeoptimize* null_check_deoptimize = new (graph->GetArena()) |
| HDeoptimize(null_check_cond, suspend_check->GetDexPc()); |
| pre_header->InsertInstructionBefore(null_check_cond, pre_header->GetLastInstruction()); |
| pre_header->InsertInstructionBefore( |
| null_check_deoptimize, pre_header->GetLastInstruction()); |
| // Eliminate null check in the loop. |
| null_check->ReplaceWith(array); |
| null_check->GetBlock()->RemoveInstruction(null_check); |
| null_check_deoptimize->CopyEnvironmentFromWithLoopPhiAdjustment( |
| suspend_check->GetEnvironment(), block); |
| } |
| // Hoist array_length out of loop. |
| array_length->MoveBefore(pre_header->GetLastInstruction()); |
| } |
| |
| HIntConstant* offset_instr = graph->GetIntConstant(offset); |
| HAdd* add = new (graph->GetArena()) HAdd(Primitive::kPrimInt, array_length, offset_instr); |
| HCondition* cond = new (graph->GetArena()) HGreaterThan(value, add); |
| HDeoptimize* deoptimize = new (graph->GetArena()) |
| HDeoptimize(cond, suspend_check->GetDexPc()); |
| pre_header->InsertInstructionBefore(add, pre_header->GetLastInstruction()); |
| pre_header->InsertInstructionBefore(cond, pre_header->GetLastInstruction()); |
| pre_header->InsertInstructionBefore(deoptimize, pre_header->GetLastInstruction()); |
| deoptimize->CopyEnvironmentFromWithLoopPhiAdjustment( |
| suspend_check->GetEnvironment(), block); |
| } |
| |
| // Add deoptimizations in loop pre-header with the collected array access |
| // data so that value ranges can be established in loop body. |
| // Returns true if deoptimizations are successfully added, or if it's proven |
| // it's not necessary. |
| bool AddDeoptimization(const ArrayAccessInsideLoopFinder& finder) { |
| int32_t offset_low = finder.GetOffsetLow(); |
| int32_t offset_high = finder.GetOffsetHigh(); |
| HArrayLength* array_length = finder.GetFoundArrayLength(); |
| |
| HBasicBlock* pre_header = |
| induction_variable_->GetBlock()->GetLoopInformation()->GetPreHeader(); |
| if (!initial_->GetBlock()->Dominates(pre_header) || |
| !end_->GetBlock()->Dominates(pre_header)) { |
| // Can't move initial_ or end_ into pre_header for comparisons. |
| return false; |
| } |
| |
| bool is_constant_proven, is_length_proven; |
| if (increment_ == 1) { |
| // Increasing from initial_ to end_. |
| int32_t offset = inclusive_ ? -offset_high - 1 : -offset_high; |
| if (CanAddDeoptimizationConstant(initial_, -offset_low, &is_constant_proven) && |
| CanAddDeoptimizationArrayLength(end_, array_length, offset, &is_length_proven)) { |
| if (!is_constant_proven) { |
| AddDeoptimizationConstant(initial_, -offset_low); |
| } |
| if (!is_length_proven) { |
| AddDeoptimizationArrayLength(end_, array_length, offset); |
| } |
| return true; |
| } |
| } else if (increment_ == -1) { |
| // Decreasing from initial_ to end_. |
| int32_t constant = inclusive_ ? -offset_low : -offset_low - 1; |
| if (CanAddDeoptimizationConstant(end_, constant, &is_constant_proven) && |
| CanAddDeoptimizationArrayLength( |
| initial_, array_length, -offset_high - 1, &is_length_proven)) { |
| if (!is_constant_proven) { |
| AddDeoptimizationConstant(end_, constant); |
| } |
| if (!is_length_proven) { |
| AddDeoptimizationArrayLength(initial_, array_length, -offset_high - 1); |
| } |
| return true; |
| } |
| } |
| return false; |
| } |
| |
| // Try to add HDeoptimize's in the loop pre-header first to narrow this range. |
| ValueRange* NarrowWithDeoptimization() { |
| if (increment_ != 1 && increment_ != -1) { |
| // TODO: possibly handle overflow/underflow issues with deoptimization. |
| return this; |
| } |
| |
| if (end_ == nullptr) { |
| // No full info to add deoptimization. |
| return this; |
| } |
| |
| ArrayAccessInsideLoopFinder finder(induction_variable_); |
| |
| if (!finder.HasFoundArrayLength()) { |
| // No array access was found inside the loop that can benefit |
| // from deoptimization. |
| return this; |
| } |
| |
| if (!AddDeoptimization(finder)) { |
| return this; |
| } |
| |
| // After added deoptimizations, induction variable fits in |
| // [-offset_low, array.length-1-offset_high], adjusted with collected offsets. |
| ValueBound lower = ValueBound(0, -finder.GetOffsetLow()); |
| ValueBound upper = ValueBound(finder.GetFoundArrayLength(), -1 - finder.GetOffsetHigh()); |
| // We've narrowed the range after added deoptimizations. |
| return new (GetAllocator()) ValueRange(GetAllocator(), lower, upper); |
| } |
| |
| private: |
| HPhi* const induction_variable_; // Induction variable for this monotonic value range. |
| HInstruction* const initial_; // Initial value. |
| HInstruction* end_; // End value. |
| bool inclusive_; // Whether end value is inclusive. |
| const int32_t increment_; // Increment for each loop iteration. |
| const ValueBound bound_; // Additional value bound info for initial_. |
| |
| DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN(MonotonicValueRange); |
| }; |
| |
| class BCEVisitor : public HGraphVisitor { |
| public: |
| // The least number of bounds checks that should be eliminated by triggering |
| // the deoptimization technique. |
| static constexpr size_t kThresholdForAddingDeoptimize = 2; |
| |
| // Very large constant index is considered as an anomaly. This is a threshold |
| // beyond which we don't bother to apply the deoptimization technique since |
| // it's likely some AIOOBE will be thrown. |
| static constexpr int32_t kMaxConstantForAddingDeoptimize = INT_MAX - 1024 * 1024; |
| |
| explicit BCEVisitor(HGraph* graph) |
| : HGraphVisitor(graph), |
| maps_(graph->GetBlocks().Size()), |
| need_to_revisit_block_(false) {} |
| |
| void VisitBasicBlock(HBasicBlock* block) OVERRIDE { |
| first_constant_index_bounds_check_map_.clear(); |
| HGraphVisitor::VisitBasicBlock(block); |
| if (need_to_revisit_block_) { |
| AddComparesWithDeoptimization(block); |
| need_to_revisit_block_ = false; |
| first_constant_index_bounds_check_map_.clear(); |
| GetValueRangeMap(block)->clear(); |
| HGraphVisitor::VisitBasicBlock(block); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| private: |
| // Return the map of proven value ranges at the beginning of a basic block. |
| ArenaSafeMap<int, ValueRange*>* GetValueRangeMap(HBasicBlock* basic_block) { |
| int block_id = basic_block->GetBlockId(); |
| if (maps_.at(block_id) == nullptr) { |
| std::unique_ptr<ArenaSafeMap<int, ValueRange*>> map( |
| new ArenaSafeMap<int, ValueRange*>( |
| std::less<int>(), GetGraph()->GetArena()->Adapter())); |
| maps_.at(block_id) = std::move(map); |
| } |
| return maps_.at(block_id).get(); |
| } |
| |
| // Traverse up the dominator tree to look for value range info. |
| ValueRange* LookupValueRange(HInstruction* instruction, HBasicBlock* basic_block) { |
| while (basic_block != nullptr) { |
| ArenaSafeMap<int, ValueRange*>* map = GetValueRangeMap(basic_block); |
| if (map->find(instruction->GetId()) != map->end()) { |
| return map->Get(instruction->GetId()); |
| } |
| basic_block = basic_block->GetDominator(); |
| } |
| // Didn't find any. |
| return nullptr; |
| } |
| |
| // Narrow the value range of `instruction` at the end of `basic_block` with `range`, |
| // and push the narrowed value range to `successor`. |
| void ApplyRangeFromComparison(HInstruction* instruction, HBasicBlock* basic_block, |
| HBasicBlock* successor, ValueRange* range) { |
| ValueRange* existing_range = LookupValueRange(instruction, basic_block); |
| if (existing_range == nullptr) { |
| if (range != nullptr) { |
| GetValueRangeMap(successor)->Overwrite(instruction->GetId(), range); |
| } |
| return; |
| } |
| if (existing_range->IsMonotonicValueRange()) { |
| DCHECK(instruction->IsLoopHeaderPhi()); |
| // Make sure the comparison is in the loop header so each increment is |
| // checked with a comparison. |
| if (instruction->GetBlock() != basic_block) { |
| return; |
| } |
| } |
| ValueRange* narrowed_range = existing_range->Narrow(range); |
| if (narrowed_range != nullptr) { |
| GetValueRangeMap(successor)->Overwrite(instruction->GetId(), narrowed_range); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| // Special case that we may simultaneously narrow two MonotonicValueRange's to |
| // regular value ranges. |
| void HandleIfBetweenTwoMonotonicValueRanges(HIf* instruction, |
| HInstruction* left, |
| HInstruction* right, |
| IfCondition cond, |
| MonotonicValueRange* left_range, |
| MonotonicValueRange* right_range) { |
| DCHECK(left->IsLoopHeaderPhi()); |
| DCHECK(right->IsLoopHeaderPhi()); |
| if (instruction->GetBlock() != left->GetBlock()) { |
| // Comparison needs to be in loop header to make sure it's done after each |
| // increment/decrement. |
| return; |
| } |
| |
| // Handle common cases which also don't have overflow/underflow concerns. |
| if (left_range->GetIncrement() == 1 && |
| left_range->GetBound().IsConstant() && |
| right_range->GetIncrement() == -1 && |
| right_range->GetBound().IsRelatedToArrayLength() && |
| right_range->GetBound().GetConstant() < 0) { |
| HBasicBlock* successor = nullptr; |
| int32_t left_compensation = 0; |
| int32_t right_compensation = 0; |
| if (cond == kCondLT) { |
| left_compensation = -1; |
| right_compensation = 1; |
| successor = instruction->IfTrueSuccessor(); |
| } else if (cond == kCondLE) { |
| successor = instruction->IfTrueSuccessor(); |
| } else if (cond == kCondGT) { |
| successor = instruction->IfFalseSuccessor(); |
| } else if (cond == kCondGE) { |
| left_compensation = -1; |
| right_compensation = 1; |
| successor = instruction->IfFalseSuccessor(); |
| } else { |
| // We don't handle '=='/'!=' test in case left and right can cross and |
| // miss each other. |
| return; |
| } |
| |
| if (successor != nullptr) { |
| bool overflow; |
| bool underflow; |
| ValueRange* new_left_range = new (GetGraph()->GetArena()) ValueRange( |
| GetGraph()->GetArena(), |
| left_range->GetBound(), |
| right_range->GetBound().Add(left_compensation, &overflow, &underflow)); |
| if (!overflow && !underflow) { |
| ApplyRangeFromComparison(left, instruction->GetBlock(), successor, |
| new_left_range); |
| } |
| |
| ValueRange* new_right_range = new (GetGraph()->GetArena()) ValueRange( |
| GetGraph()->GetArena(), |
| left_range->GetBound().Add(right_compensation, &overflow, &underflow), |
| right_range->GetBound()); |
| if (!overflow && !underflow) { |
| ApplyRangeFromComparison(right, instruction->GetBlock(), successor, |
| new_right_range); |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| |
| // Handle "if (left cmp_cond right)". |
| void HandleIf(HIf* instruction, HInstruction* left, HInstruction* right, IfCondition cond) { |
| HBasicBlock* block = instruction->GetBlock(); |
| |
| HBasicBlock* true_successor = instruction->IfTrueSuccessor(); |
| // There should be no critical edge at this point. |
| DCHECK_EQ(true_successor->GetPredecessors().Size(), 1u); |
| |
| HBasicBlock* false_successor = instruction->IfFalseSuccessor(); |
| // There should be no critical edge at this point. |
| DCHECK_EQ(false_successor->GetPredecessors().Size(), 1u); |
| |
| ValueRange* left_range = LookupValueRange(left, block); |
| MonotonicValueRange* left_monotonic_range = nullptr; |
| if (left_range != nullptr) { |
| left_monotonic_range = left_range->AsMonotonicValueRange(); |
| if (left_monotonic_range != nullptr) { |
| HBasicBlock* loop_head = left_monotonic_range->GetLoopHead(); |
| if (instruction->GetBlock() != loop_head) { |
| // For monotonic value range, don't handle `instruction` |
| // if it's not defined in the loop header. |
| return; |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| |
| bool found; |
| ValueBound bound = ValueBound::DetectValueBoundFromValue(right, &found); |
| // Each comparison can establish a lower bound and an upper bound |
| // for the left hand side. |
| ValueBound lower = bound; |
| ValueBound upper = bound; |
| if (!found) { |
| // No constant or array.length+c format bound found. |
| // For i<j, we can still use j's upper bound as i's upper bound. Same for lower. |
| ValueRange* right_range = LookupValueRange(right, block); |
| if (right_range != nullptr) { |
| if (right_range->IsMonotonicValueRange()) { |
| if (left_range != nullptr && left_range->IsMonotonicValueRange()) { |
| HandleIfBetweenTwoMonotonicValueRanges(instruction, left, right, cond, |
| left_range->AsMonotonicValueRange(), |
| right_range->AsMonotonicValueRange()); |
| return; |
| } |
| } |
| lower = right_range->GetLower(); |
| upper = right_range->GetUpper(); |
| } else { |
| lower = ValueBound::Min(); |
| upper = ValueBound::Max(); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| bool overflow, underflow; |
| if (cond == kCondLT || cond == kCondLE) { |
| if (left_monotonic_range != nullptr) { |
| // Update the info for monotonic value range. |
| if (left_monotonic_range->GetInductionVariable() == left && |
| left_monotonic_range->GetIncrement() < 0 && |
| block == left_monotonic_range->GetLoopHead() && |
| instruction->IfFalseSuccessor()->GetLoopInformation() == block->GetLoopInformation()) { |
| left_monotonic_range->SetEnd(right); |
| left_monotonic_range->SetInclusive(cond == kCondLT); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| if (!upper.Equals(ValueBound::Max())) { |
| int32_t compensation = (cond == kCondLT) ? -1 : 0; // upper bound is inclusive |
| ValueBound new_upper = upper.Add(compensation, &overflow, &underflow); |
| if (overflow || underflow) { |
| return; |
| } |
| ValueRange* new_range = new (GetGraph()->GetArena()) |
| ValueRange(GetGraph()->GetArena(), ValueBound::Min(), new_upper); |
| ApplyRangeFromComparison(left, block, true_successor, new_range); |
| } |
| |
| // array.length as a lower bound isn't considered useful. |
| if (!lower.Equals(ValueBound::Min()) && !lower.IsRelatedToArrayLength()) { |
| int32_t compensation = (cond == kCondLE) ? 1 : 0; // lower bound is inclusive |
| ValueBound new_lower = lower.Add(compensation, &overflow, &underflow); |
| if (overflow || underflow) { |
| return; |
| } |
| ValueRange* new_range = new (GetGraph()->GetArena()) |
| ValueRange(GetGraph()->GetArena(), new_lower, ValueBound::Max()); |
| ApplyRangeFromComparison(left, block, false_successor, new_range); |
| } |
| } else if (cond == kCondGT || cond == kCondGE) { |
| if (left_monotonic_range != nullptr) { |
| // Update the info for monotonic value range. |
| if (left_monotonic_range->GetInductionVariable() == left && |
| left_monotonic_range->GetIncrement() > 0 && |
| block == left_monotonic_range->GetLoopHead() && |
| instruction->IfFalseSuccessor()->GetLoopInformation() == block->GetLoopInformation()) { |
| left_monotonic_range->SetEnd(right); |
| left_monotonic_range->SetInclusive(cond == kCondGT); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| // array.length as a lower bound isn't considered useful. |
| if (!lower.Equals(ValueBound::Min()) && !lower.IsRelatedToArrayLength()) { |
| int32_t compensation = (cond == kCondGT) ? 1 : 0; // lower bound is inclusive |
| ValueBound new_lower = lower.Add(compensation, &overflow, &underflow); |
| if (overflow || underflow) { |
| return; |
| } |
| ValueRange* new_range = new (GetGraph()->GetArena()) |
| ValueRange(GetGraph()->GetArena(), new_lower, ValueBound::Max()); |
| ApplyRangeFromComparison(left, block, true_successor, new_range); |
| } |
| |
| if (!upper.Equals(ValueBound::Max())) { |
| int32_t compensation = (cond == kCondGE) ? -1 : 0; // upper bound is inclusive |
| ValueBound new_upper = upper.Add(compensation, &overflow, &underflow); |
| if (overflow || underflow) { |
| return; |
| } |
| ValueRange* new_range = new (GetGraph()->GetArena()) |
| ValueRange(GetGraph()->GetArena(), ValueBound::Min(), new_upper); |
| ApplyRangeFromComparison(left, block, false_successor, new_range); |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| |
| void VisitBoundsCheck(HBoundsCheck* bounds_check) { |
| HBasicBlock* block = bounds_check->GetBlock(); |
| HInstruction* index = bounds_check->InputAt(0); |
| HInstruction* array_length = bounds_check->InputAt(1); |
| DCHECK(array_length->IsIntConstant() || array_length->IsArrayLength()); |
| |
| if (!index->IsIntConstant()) { |
| ValueRange* index_range = LookupValueRange(index, block); |
| if (index_range != nullptr) { |
| ValueBound lower = ValueBound(nullptr, 0); // constant 0 |
| ValueBound upper = ValueBound(array_length, -1); // array_length - 1 |
| ValueRange* array_range = new (GetGraph()->GetArena()) |
| ValueRange(GetGraph()->GetArena(), lower, upper); |
| if (index_range->FitsIn(array_range)) { |
| ReplaceBoundsCheck(bounds_check, index); |
| return; |
| } |
| } |
| } else { |
| int32_t constant = index->AsIntConstant()->GetValue(); |
| if (constant < 0) { |
| // Will always throw exception. |
| return; |
| } |
| if (array_length->IsIntConstant()) { |
| if (constant < array_length->AsIntConstant()->GetValue()) { |
| ReplaceBoundsCheck(bounds_check, index); |
| } |
| return; |
| } |
| |
| DCHECK(array_length->IsArrayLength()); |
| ValueRange* existing_range = LookupValueRange(array_length, block); |
| if (existing_range != nullptr) { |
| ValueBound lower = existing_range->GetLower(); |
| DCHECK(lower.IsConstant()); |
| if (constant < lower.GetConstant()) { |
| ReplaceBoundsCheck(bounds_check, index); |
| return; |
| } else { |
| // Existing range isn't strong enough to eliminate the bounds check. |
| // Fall through to update the array_length range with info from this |
| // bounds check. |
| } |
| } |
| |
| if (first_constant_index_bounds_check_map_.find(array_length->GetId()) == |
| first_constant_index_bounds_check_map_.end()) { |
| // Remember the first bounds check against array_length of a constant index. |
| // That bounds check instruction has an associated HEnvironment where we |
| // may add an HDeoptimize to eliminate bounds checks of constant indices |
| // against array_length. |
| first_constant_index_bounds_check_map_.Put(array_length->GetId(), bounds_check); |
| } else { |
| // We've seen it at least twice. It's beneficial to introduce a compare with |
| // deoptimization fallback to eliminate the bounds checks. |
| need_to_revisit_block_ = true; |
| } |
| |
| // Once we have an array access like 'array[5] = 1', we record array.length >= 6. |
| // We currently don't do it for non-constant index since a valid array[i] can't prove |
| // a valid array[i-1] yet due to the lower bound side. |
| if (constant == INT_MAX) { |
| // INT_MAX as an index will definitely throw AIOOBE. |
| return; |
| } |
| ValueBound lower = ValueBound(nullptr, constant + 1); |
| ValueBound upper = ValueBound::Max(); |
| ValueRange* range = new (GetGraph()->GetArena()) |
| ValueRange(GetGraph()->GetArena(), lower, upper); |
| GetValueRangeMap(block)->Overwrite(array_length->GetId(), range); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| void ReplaceBoundsCheck(HInstruction* bounds_check, HInstruction* index) { |
| bounds_check->ReplaceWith(index); |
| bounds_check->GetBlock()->RemoveInstruction(bounds_check); |
| } |
| |
| void VisitPhi(HPhi* phi) { |
| if (phi->IsLoopHeaderPhi() && phi->GetType() == Primitive::kPrimInt) { |
| DCHECK_EQ(phi->InputCount(), 2U); |
| HInstruction* instruction = phi->InputAt(1); |
| HInstruction *left; |
| int32_t increment; |
| if (ValueBound::IsAddOrSubAConstant(instruction, &left, &increment)) { |
| if (left == phi) { |
| HInstruction* initial_value = phi->InputAt(0); |
| ValueRange* range = nullptr; |
| if (increment == 0) { |
| // Add constant 0. It's really a fixed value. |
| range = new (GetGraph()->GetArena()) ValueRange( |
| GetGraph()->GetArena(), |
| ValueBound(initial_value, 0), |
| ValueBound(initial_value, 0)); |
| } else { |
| // Monotonically increasing/decreasing. |
| bool found; |
| ValueBound bound = ValueBound::DetectValueBoundFromValue( |
| initial_value, &found); |
| if (!found) { |
| // No constant or array.length+c bound found. |
| // For i=j, we can still use j's upper bound as i's upper bound. |
| // Same for lower. |
| ValueRange* initial_range = LookupValueRange(initial_value, phi->GetBlock()); |
| if (initial_range != nullptr) { |
| bound = increment > 0 ? initial_range->GetLower() : |
| initial_range->GetUpper(); |
| } else { |
| bound = increment > 0 ? ValueBound::Min() : ValueBound::Max(); |
| } |
| } |
| range = new (GetGraph()->GetArena()) MonotonicValueRange( |
| GetGraph()->GetArena(), |
| phi, |
| initial_value, |
| increment, |
| bound); |
| } |
| GetValueRangeMap(phi->GetBlock())->Overwrite(phi->GetId(), range); |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| |
| void VisitIf(HIf* instruction) { |
| if (instruction->InputAt(0)->IsCondition()) { |
| HCondition* cond = instruction->InputAt(0)->AsCondition(); |
| IfCondition cmp = cond->GetCondition(); |
| if (cmp == kCondGT || cmp == kCondGE || |
| cmp == kCondLT || cmp == kCondLE) { |
| HInstruction* left = cond->GetLeft(); |
| HInstruction* right = cond->GetRight(); |
| HandleIf(instruction, left, right, cmp); |
| |
| HBasicBlock* block = instruction->GetBlock(); |
| ValueRange* left_range = LookupValueRange(left, block); |
| if (left_range == nullptr) { |
| return; |
| } |
| |
| if (left_range->IsMonotonicValueRange() && |
| block == left_range->AsMonotonicValueRange()->GetLoopHead()) { |
| // The comparison is for an induction variable in the loop header. |
| DCHECK(left == left_range->AsMonotonicValueRange()->GetInductionVariable()); |
| HBasicBlock* loop_body_successor; |
| if (LIKELY(block->GetLoopInformation()-> |
| Contains(*instruction->IfFalseSuccessor()))) { |
| loop_body_successor = instruction->IfFalseSuccessor(); |
| } else { |
| loop_body_successor = instruction->IfTrueSuccessor(); |
| } |
| ValueRange* new_left_range = LookupValueRange(left, loop_body_successor); |
| if (new_left_range == left_range) { |
| // We are not successful in narrowing the monotonic value range to |
| // a regular value range. Try using deoptimization. |
| new_left_range = left_range->AsMonotonicValueRange()-> |
| NarrowWithDeoptimization(); |
| if (new_left_range != left_range) { |
| GetValueRangeMap(instruction->IfFalseSuccessor())-> |
| Overwrite(left->GetId(), new_left_range); |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| |
| void VisitAdd(HAdd* add) { |
| HInstruction* right = add->GetRight(); |
| if (right->IsIntConstant()) { |
| ValueRange* left_range = LookupValueRange(add->GetLeft(), add->GetBlock()); |
| if (left_range == nullptr) { |
| return; |
| } |
| ValueRange* range = left_range->Add(right->AsIntConstant()->GetValue()); |
| if (range != nullptr) { |
| GetValueRangeMap(add->GetBlock())->Overwrite(add->GetId(), range); |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| |
| void VisitSub(HSub* sub) { |
| HInstruction* left = sub->GetLeft(); |
| HInstruction* right = sub->GetRight(); |
| if (right->IsIntConstant()) { |
| ValueRange* left_range = LookupValueRange(left, sub->GetBlock()); |
| if (left_range == nullptr) { |
| return; |
| } |
| ValueRange* range = left_range->Add(-right->AsIntConstant()->GetValue()); |
| if (range != nullptr) { |
| GetValueRangeMap(sub->GetBlock())->Overwrite(sub->GetId(), range); |
| return; |
| } |
| } |
| |
| // Here we are interested in the typical triangular case of nested loops, |
| // such as the inner loop 'for (int j=0; j<array.length-i; j++)' where i |
| // is the index for outer loop. In this case, we know j is bounded by array.length-1. |
| |
| // Try to handle (array.length - i) or (array.length + c - i) format. |
| HInstruction* left_of_left; // left input of left. |
| int32_t right_const = 0; |
| if (ValueBound::IsAddOrSubAConstant(left, &left_of_left, &right_const)) { |
| left = left_of_left; |
| } |
| // The value of left input of the sub equals (left + right_const). |
| |
| if (left->IsArrayLength()) { |
| HInstruction* array_length = left->AsArrayLength(); |
| ValueRange* right_range = LookupValueRange(right, sub->GetBlock()); |
| if (right_range != nullptr) { |
| ValueBound lower = right_range->GetLower(); |
| ValueBound upper = right_range->GetUpper(); |
| if (lower.IsConstant() && upper.IsRelatedToArrayLength()) { |
| HInstruction* upper_inst = upper.GetInstruction(); |
| // Make sure it's the same array. |
| if (ValueBound::Equal(array_length, upper_inst)) { |
| int32_t c0 = right_const; |
| int32_t c1 = lower.GetConstant(); |
| int32_t c2 = upper.GetConstant(); |
| // (array.length + c0 - v) where v is in [c1, array.length + c2] |
| // gets [c0 - c2, array.length + c0 - c1] as its value range. |
| if (!ValueBound::WouldAddOverflowOrUnderflow(c0, -c2) && |
| !ValueBound::WouldAddOverflowOrUnderflow(c0, -c1)) { |
| if ((c0 - c1) <= 0) { |
| // array.length + (c0 - c1) won't overflow/underflow. |
| ValueRange* range = new (GetGraph()->GetArena()) ValueRange( |
| GetGraph()->GetArena(), |
| ValueBound(nullptr, right_const - upper.GetConstant()), |
| ValueBound(array_length, right_const - lower.GetConstant())); |
| GetValueRangeMap(sub->GetBlock())->Overwrite(sub->GetId(), range); |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| |
| void FindAndHandlePartialArrayLength(HBinaryOperation* instruction) { |
| DCHECK(instruction->IsDiv() || instruction->IsShr() || instruction->IsUShr()); |
| HInstruction* right = instruction->GetRight(); |
| int32_t right_const; |
| if (right->IsIntConstant()) { |
| right_const = right->AsIntConstant()->GetValue(); |
| // Detect division by two or more. |
| if ((instruction->IsDiv() && right_const <= 1) || |
| (instruction->IsShr() && right_const < 1) || |
| (instruction->IsUShr() && right_const < 1)) { |
| return; |
| } |
| } else { |
| return; |
| } |
| |
| // Try to handle array.length/2 or (array.length-1)/2 format. |
| HInstruction* left = instruction->GetLeft(); |
| HInstruction* left_of_left; // left input of left. |
| int32_t c = 0; |
| if (ValueBound::IsAddOrSubAConstant(left, &left_of_left, &c)) { |
| left = left_of_left; |
| } |
| // The value of left input of instruction equals (left + c). |
| |
| // (array_length + 1) or smaller divided by two or more |
| // always generate a value in [INT_MIN, array_length]. |
| // This is true even if array_length is INT_MAX. |
| if (left->IsArrayLength() && c <= 1) { |
| if (instruction->IsUShr() && c < 0) { |
| // Make sure for unsigned shift, left side is not negative. |
| // e.g. if array_length is 2, ((array_length - 3) >>> 2) is way bigger |
| // than array_length. |
| return; |
| } |
| ValueRange* range = new (GetGraph()->GetArena()) ValueRange( |
| GetGraph()->GetArena(), |
| ValueBound(nullptr, INT_MIN), |
| ValueBound(left, 0)); |
| GetValueRangeMap(instruction->GetBlock())->Overwrite(instruction->GetId(), range); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| void VisitDiv(HDiv* div) { |
| FindAndHandlePartialArrayLength(div); |
| } |
| |
| void VisitShr(HShr* shr) { |
| FindAndHandlePartialArrayLength(shr); |
| } |
| |
| void VisitUShr(HUShr* ushr) { |
| FindAndHandlePartialArrayLength(ushr); |
| } |
| |
| void VisitAnd(HAnd* instruction) { |
| if (instruction->GetRight()->IsIntConstant()) { |
| int32_t constant = instruction->GetRight()->AsIntConstant()->GetValue(); |
| if (constant > 0) { |
| // constant serves as a mask so any number masked with it |
| // gets a [0, constant] value range. |
| ValueRange* range = new (GetGraph()->GetArena()) ValueRange( |
| GetGraph()->GetArena(), |
| ValueBound(nullptr, 0), |
| ValueBound(nullptr, constant)); |
| GetValueRangeMap(instruction->GetBlock())->Overwrite(instruction->GetId(), range); |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| |
| void VisitNewArray(HNewArray* new_array) { |
| HInstruction* len = new_array->InputAt(0); |
| if (!len->IsIntConstant()) { |
| HInstruction *left; |
| int32_t right_const; |
| if (ValueBound::IsAddOrSubAConstant(len, &left, &right_const)) { |
| // (left + right_const) is used as size to new the array. |
| // We record "-right_const <= left <= new_array - right_const"; |
| ValueBound lower = ValueBound(nullptr, -right_const); |
| // We use new_array for the bound instead of new_array.length, |
| // which isn't available as an instruction yet. new_array will |
| // be treated the same as new_array.length when it's used in a ValueBound. |
| ValueBound upper = ValueBound(new_array, -right_const); |
| ValueRange* range = new (GetGraph()->GetArena()) |
| ValueRange(GetGraph()->GetArena(), lower, upper); |
| GetValueRangeMap(new_array->GetBlock())->Overwrite(left->GetId(), range); |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| |
| void VisitDeoptimize(HDeoptimize* deoptimize) { |
| // Right now it's only HLessThanOrEqual. |
| DCHECK(deoptimize->InputAt(0)->IsLessThanOrEqual()); |
| HLessThanOrEqual* less_than_or_equal = deoptimize->InputAt(0)->AsLessThanOrEqual(); |
| HInstruction* instruction = less_than_or_equal->InputAt(0); |
| if (instruction->IsArrayLength()) { |
| HInstruction* constant = less_than_or_equal->InputAt(1); |
| DCHECK(constant->IsIntConstant()); |
| DCHECK(constant->AsIntConstant()->GetValue() <= kMaxConstantForAddingDeoptimize); |
| ValueBound lower = ValueBound(nullptr, constant->AsIntConstant()->GetValue() + 1); |
| ValueRange* range = new (GetGraph()->GetArena()) |
| ValueRange(GetGraph()->GetArena(), lower, ValueBound::Max()); |
| GetValueRangeMap(deoptimize->GetBlock())->Overwrite(instruction->GetId(), range); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| void AddCompareWithDeoptimization(HInstruction* array_length, |
| HIntConstant* const_instr, |
| HBasicBlock* block) { |
| DCHECK(array_length->IsArrayLength()); |
| ValueRange* range = LookupValueRange(array_length, block); |
| ValueBound lower_bound = range->GetLower(); |
| DCHECK(lower_bound.IsConstant()); |
| DCHECK(const_instr->GetValue() <= kMaxConstantForAddingDeoptimize); |
| DCHECK_EQ(lower_bound.GetConstant(), const_instr->GetValue() + 1); |
| |
| // If array_length is less than lower_const, deoptimize. |
| HBoundsCheck* bounds_check = first_constant_index_bounds_check_map_.Get( |
| array_length->GetId())->AsBoundsCheck(); |
| HCondition* cond = new (GetGraph()->GetArena()) HLessThanOrEqual(array_length, const_instr); |
| HDeoptimize* deoptimize = new (GetGraph()->GetArena()) |
| HDeoptimize(cond, bounds_check->GetDexPc()); |
| block->InsertInstructionBefore(cond, bounds_check); |
| block->InsertInstructionBefore(deoptimize, bounds_check); |
| deoptimize->CopyEnvironmentFrom(bounds_check->GetEnvironment()); |
| } |
| |
| void AddComparesWithDeoptimization(HBasicBlock* block) { |
| for (ArenaSafeMap<int, HBoundsCheck*>::iterator it = |
| first_constant_index_bounds_check_map_.begin(); |
| it != first_constant_index_bounds_check_map_.end(); |
| ++it) { |
| HBoundsCheck* bounds_check = it->second; |
| HArrayLength* array_length = bounds_check->InputAt(1)->AsArrayLength(); |
| HIntConstant* lower_bound_const_instr = nullptr; |
| int32_t lower_bound_const = INT_MIN; |
| size_t counter = 0; |
| // Count the constant indexing for which bounds checks haven't |
| // been removed yet. |
| for (HUseIterator<HInstruction*> it2(array_length->GetUses()); |
| !it2.Done(); |
| it2.Advance()) { |
| HInstruction* user = it2.Current()->GetUser(); |
| if (user->GetBlock() == block && |
| user->IsBoundsCheck() && |
| user->AsBoundsCheck()->InputAt(0)->IsIntConstant()) { |
| DCHECK_EQ(array_length, user->AsBoundsCheck()->InputAt(1)); |
| HIntConstant* const_instr = user->AsBoundsCheck()->InputAt(0)->AsIntConstant(); |
| if (const_instr->GetValue() > lower_bound_const) { |
| lower_bound_const = const_instr->GetValue(); |
| lower_bound_const_instr = const_instr; |
| } |
| counter++; |
| } |
| } |
| if (counter >= kThresholdForAddingDeoptimize && |
| lower_bound_const_instr->GetValue() <= kMaxConstantForAddingDeoptimize) { |
| AddCompareWithDeoptimization(array_length, lower_bound_const_instr, block); |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| |
| std::vector<std::unique_ptr<ArenaSafeMap<int, ValueRange*>>> maps_; |
| |
| // Map an HArrayLength instruction's id to the first HBoundsCheck instruction in |
| // a block that checks a constant index against that HArrayLength. |
| SafeMap<int, HBoundsCheck*> first_constant_index_bounds_check_map_; |
| |
| // For the block, there is at least one HArrayLength instruction for which there |
| // is more than one bounds check instruction with constant indexing. And it's |
| // beneficial to add a compare instruction that has deoptimization fallback and |
| // eliminate those bounds checks. |
| bool need_to_revisit_block_; |
| |
| DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN(BCEVisitor); |
| }; |
| |
| void BoundsCheckElimination::Run() { |
| if (!graph_->HasBoundsChecks()) { |
| return; |
| } |
| |
| BCEVisitor visitor(graph_); |
| // Reverse post order guarantees a node's dominators are visited first. |
| // We want to visit in the dominator-based order since if a value is known to |
| // be bounded by a range at one instruction, it must be true that all uses of |
| // that value dominated by that instruction fits in that range. Range of that |
| // value can be narrowed further down in the dominator tree. |
| // |
| // TODO: only visit blocks that dominate some array accesses. |
| visitor.VisitReversePostOrder(); |
| } |
| |
| } // namespace art |