| These rules are fairly standard and boring. People will bitch about something |
| in here, no doubt. Get over it. Much of this was stolen from the Linux Kernel |
| coding style, because most of it makes good sense. If you disagree, that's OK, |
| but please stick to the rules anyway ;-) |
| |
| |
| Language |
| |
| Please use Python where possible. It's not the ideal language for everything, |
| but it's pretty good, and consistency goes a long way in making the project |
| maintainable. (Obviously using C or whatever for writing tests is fine). |
| |
| |
| Indentation & whitespace |
| |
| Format your code for an 80 character wide screen. |
| |
| Indentation is hard tabs, equivalent to 8 spaces. Yes, I know that's pretty |
| large, but especially in Python where code flow is controlled by indentation |
| levels, it's critical for it to be clearly visibile. |
| |
| People will claim that doesn't allow them enough levels of indentation on an |
| 80 character screen - they need to fix their code instead: use smaller |
| functions, and more local variables - it makes the code so much easier to read. |
| |
| Don't leave trailing whitespace, or put whitespace on blank lines. |
| Leave TWO blank lines between functions - this is Python, there are no clear |
| function end markers, and we need help. |
| |
| |
| Variable names and UpPeR cAsE |
| |
| Use descriptive variable names where possible - it helps to make the code |
| self documenting. |
| |
| Don't use CamelCaps style in most places - use underscores to separate parts |
| of your variable_names please. I shall make a bedgrudging exception for class |
| names I suppose, but I'll still whine about it a lot. |
| |
| |
| Comments |
| |
| Generally, you want your comments to tell WHAT your code does, not HOW. |
| We can figure out how from the code itself (or if not, your code needs fixing). |
| |
| Try to describle the intent of a function and what it does in a triple-quoted |
| (multiline) string just after the def line. We've tried to do that in most |
| places, though undoubtedly we're not perfect. A high level overview is |
| incredibly helpful in understanding code. |
| |
| |
| Simple code |
| |
| Keep it simple; this is not the right place to show how smart you are. We |
| have plenty of system failures to deal with without having to spend ages |
| figuring out your code, thanks ;-) Readbility, readability, readability. |
| I really don't care if other things are more compact. |
| |
| "Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, |
| if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not |
| smart enough to debug it." Brian Kernighan |
| |
| |
| Function length |
| |
| Please keep functions short, under 30 lines or so if possible. Even though |
| you are amazingly clever, and can cope with it, the rest of us are all stupid, |
| so be nice and help us out. To quote the Linux Kernel coding style: |
| |
| Functions should be short and sweet, and do just one thing. They should |
| fit on one or two screenfuls of text (the ISO/ANSI screen size is 80x24, |
| as we all know), and do one thing and do that well. |
| |
| |
| Submitting patches |
| |
| Generate universal diffs. Email them to autotest@test.kernel.org. |
| Most mailers now break lines and/or changes tabs to spaces. If you know how |
| to avoid that - great, put your patches inline. If you're not sure, just |
| attatch them, I don't care much. Please base them off the current version. |
| |
| Don't worry about submitting patches to a public list - everybody makes |
| mistakes, especially me ... so get over it and don't worry about it. |
| (though do give your changes a test first ;-)) |