John McCall | 2f51448 | 2010-01-27 03:50:35 +0000 | [diff] [blame^] | 1 | // RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -faccess-control -verify %s |
| 2 | |
| 3 | // C++0x [class.access]p6: |
| 4 | // All access controls in [class.access] affect the ability to |
| 5 | // access a class member name from a particular scope. For purposes |
| 6 | // of access control, the base-specifiers of a class and the |
| 7 | // definitions of class members that appear outside of the class |
| 8 | // definition are considered to be within the scope of that |
| 9 | // class. In particular, access controls apply as usual to member |
| 10 | // names accessed as part of a function return type, even though it |
| 11 | // is not possible to determine the access privileges of that use |
| 12 | // without first parsing the rest of the function |
| 13 | // declarator. Similarly, access control for implicit calls to the |
| 14 | // constructors, the conversion functions, or the destructor called |
| 15 | // to create and destroy a static data member is performed as if |
| 16 | // these calls appeared in the scope of the member's class. |
| 17 | |
| 18 | namespace test0 { |
| 19 | class A { |
| 20 | typedef int type; // expected-note {{declared private here}} |
| 21 | type foo(); |
| 22 | }; |
| 23 | |
| 24 | A::type foo() { } // expected-error {{access to private member}} |
| 25 | A::type A::foo() { } |
| 26 | } |