blob: 6434a910e132bfcbf6af83f518fb8c202281ce75 [file] [log] [blame]
Ted Kremenek17a295d2008-06-11 06:19:49 +00001<html>
2<head>
Chris Lattner86920d32007-07-31 05:42:17 +00003<title>"clang" CFE Internals Manual</title>
Ted Kremenek17a295d2008-06-11 06:19:49 +00004<link type="text/css" rel="stylesheet" href="../menu.css" />
5<link type="text/css" rel="stylesheet" href="../content.css" />
Sebastian Redl68168562008-11-22 22:16:45 +00006<style type="text/css">
7td {
8 vertical-align: top;
9}
10</style>
Ted Kremenek17a295d2008-06-11 06:19:49 +000011</head>
12<body>
13
14<!--#include virtual="../menu.html.incl"-->
15
16<div id="content">
Chris Lattner86920d32007-07-31 05:42:17 +000017
18<h1>"clang" CFE Internals Manual</h1>
19
20<ul>
21<li><a href="#intro">Introduction</a></li>
22<li><a href="#libsystem">LLVM System and Support Libraries</a></li>
23<li><a href="#libbasic">The clang 'Basic' Library</a>
24 <ul>
Chris Lattner62fd2782008-11-22 21:41:31 +000025 <li><a href="#Diagnostics">The Diagnostics Subsystem</a></li>
Chris Lattner86920d32007-07-31 05:42:17 +000026 <li><a href="#SourceLocation">The SourceLocation and SourceManager
27 classes</a></li>
28 </ul>
29</li>
30<li><a href="#liblex">The Lexer and Preprocessor Library</a>
31 <ul>
32 <li><a href="#Token">The Token class</a></li>
33 <li><a href="#Lexer">The Lexer class</a></li>
Chris Lattner79281252008-03-09 02:27:26 +000034 <li><a href="#TokenLexer">The TokenLexer class</a></li>
Chris Lattner86920d32007-07-31 05:42:17 +000035 <li><a href="#MultipleIncludeOpt">The MultipleIncludeOpt class</a></li>
36 </ul>
37</li>
38<li><a href="#libparse">The Parser Library</a>
39 <ul>
40 </ul>
41</li>
42<li><a href="#libast">The AST Library</a>
43 <ul>
44 <li><a href="#Type">The Type class and its subclasses</a></li>
45 <li><a href="#QualType">The QualType class</a></li>
Douglas Gregor2e1cd422008-11-17 14:58:09 +000046 <li><a href="#DeclarationName">Declaration names</a></li>
Ted Kremenek8bc05712007-10-10 23:01:43 +000047 <li><a href="#CFG">The CFG class</a></li>
Chris Lattner7bad1992008-11-16 21:48:07 +000048 <li><a href="#Constants">Constant Folding in the Clang AST</a></li>
Chris Lattner86920d32007-07-31 05:42:17 +000049 </ul>
50</li>
51</ul>
52
53
54<!-- ======================================================================= -->
55<h2 id="intro">Introduction</h2>
56<!-- ======================================================================= -->
57
58<p>This document describes some of the more important APIs and internal design
59decisions made in the clang C front-end. The purpose of this document is to
60both capture some of this high level information and also describe some of the
61design decisions behind it. This is meant for people interested in hacking on
62clang, not for end-users. The description below is categorized by
63libraries, and does not describe any of the clients of the libraries.</p>
64
65<!-- ======================================================================= -->
66<h2 id="libsystem">LLVM System and Support Libraries</h2>
67<!-- ======================================================================= -->
68
69<p>The LLVM libsystem library provides the basic clang system abstraction layer,
70which is used for file system access. The LLVM libsupport library provides many
71underlying libraries and <a
72href="http://llvm.org/docs/ProgrammersManual.html">data-structures</a>,
73 including command line option
74processing and various containers.</p>
75
76<!-- ======================================================================= -->
77<h2 id="libbasic">The clang 'Basic' Library</h2>
78<!-- ======================================================================= -->
79
80<p>This library certainly needs a better name. The 'basic' library contains a
81number of low-level utilities for tracking and manipulating source buffers,
82locations within the source buffers, diagnostics, tokens, target abstraction,
83and information about the subset of the language being compiled for.</p>
84
85<p>Part of this infrastructure is specific to C (such as the TargetInfo class),
86other parts could be reused for other non-C-based languages (SourceLocation,
87SourceManager, Diagnostics, FileManager). When and if there is future demand
88we can figure out if it makes sense to introduce a new library, move the general
89classes somewhere else, or introduce some other solution.</p>
90
91<p>We describe the roles of these classes in order of their dependencies.</p>
92
Chris Lattner62fd2782008-11-22 21:41:31 +000093
94<!-- ======================================================================= -->
95<h3 id="Diagnostics">The Diagnostics Subsystem</h3>
96<!-- ======================================================================= -->
97
98<p>The Clang Diagnostics subsystem is an important part of how the compiler
99communicates with the human. Diagnostics are the warnings and errors produced
100when the code is incorrect or dubious. In Clang, each diagnostic produced has
101(at the minimum) a unique ID, a <a href="#SourceLocation">SourceLocation</a> to
102"put the caret", an English translation associated with it, and a severity (e.g.
103<tt>WARNING</tt> or <tt>ERROR</tt>). They can also optionally include a number
104of arguments to the dianostic (which fill in "%0"'s in the string) as well as a
105number of source ranges that related to the diagnostic.</p>
106
107<p>In this section, we'll be giving examples produced by the clang command line
108driver, but diagnostics can be <a href="#DiagnosticClient">rendered in many
109different ways</a> depending on how the DiagnosticClient interface is
110implemented. A representative example of a diagonstic is:</p>
111
112<pre>
113t.c:38:15: error: invalid operands to binary expression ('int *' and '_Complex float')
114 <font color="darkgreen">P = (P-42) + Gamma*4;</font>
115 <font color="blue">~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~</font>
116</pre>
117
118<p>In this example, you can see the English translation, the severity (error),
119you can see the source location (the caret ("^") and file/line/column info),
120the source ranges "~~~~", arguments to the diagnostic ("int*" and "_Complex
121float"). You'll have to believe me that there is a unique ID backing the
122diagnostic :).</p>
123
124<p>Getting all of this to happen has several steps and involves many moving
125pieces, this section describes them and talks about best practices when adding
126a new diagnostic.</p>
127
128<!-- ============================ -->
129<h4>The DiagnosticKinds.def file</h4>
130<!-- ============================ -->
131
132<p>Diagnostics are created by adding an entry to the <tt><a
133href="http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticKinds.def"
134>DiagnosticKinds.def</a></tt> file. This file encodes the unique ID of the
135diagnostic (as an enum, the first argument), the severity of the diagnostic
136(second argument) and the English translation + format string.</p>
137
138<p>There is little sanity with the naming of the unique ID's right now. Some
139start with err_, warn_, ext_ to encode the severity into the name. Since the
140enum is referenced in the C++ code that produces the diagnostic, it is somewhat
141useful for it to be reasonably short.</p>
142
143<p>The severity of the diagnostic comes from the set {<tt>NOTE</tt>,
144<tt>WARNING</tt>, <tt>EXTENSION</tt>, <tt>EXTWARN</tt>, <tt>ERROR</tt>}. The
145<tt>ERROR</tt> severity is used for diagnostics indicating the program is never
146acceptable under any circumstances. When an error is emitted, the AST for the
147input code may not be fully built. The <tt>EXTENSION</tt> and <tt>EXTWARN</tt>
148severities are used for extensions to the language that Clang accepts. This
149means that Clang fully understands and can represent them in the AST, but we
150produce diagnostics to tell the user their code is non-portable. The difference
151is that the former are ignored by default, and the later warn by default. The
152<tt>WARNING</tt> severity is used for constructs that are valid in the currently
153selected source language but that are dubious in some way. The <tt>NOTE</tt>
154level is used to staple more information onto a previous diagnostics.</p>
155
156<p>These <em>severities</em> are mapped into a smaller set (the
157Diagnostic::Level enum, {<tt>Ignored</tt>, <tt>Note</tt>, <tt>Warning</tt>,
158<tt>Error</tt> }) of output <em>levels</em> by the diagnostics subsystem based
159on various configuration options. For example, if the user specifies
160<tt>-pedantic</tt>, <tt>EXTENSION</tt> maps to <tt>Warning</tt>, if they specify
161<tt>-pedantic-errors</tt>, it turns into <tt>Error</tt>. Clang also internally
162supports a fully fine grained mapping mechanism that allows you to map any
163diagnostic that doesn't have <tt>ERRROR</tt> severity to any output level that
164you want. This is used to implement options like <tt>-Wunused_macros</tt>,
165<tt>-Wundef</tt> etc.</p>
166
167<!-- ================= -->
168<h4>The Format String</h4>
169<!-- ================= -->
170
171<p>The format string for the diagnostic is very simple, but it has some power.
172It takes the form of a string in English with markers that indicate where and
173how arguments to the diagnostic are inserted and formatted. For example, here
174are some simple format strings:</p>
175
176<pre>
177 "binary integer literals are an extension"
178 "format string contains '\\0' within the string body"
179 "more '<b>%%</b>' conversions than data arguments"
180 "invalid operands to binary expression ('<b>%0</b>' and '<b>%1</b>')"
181 "overloaded '<b>%0</b>' must be a <b>%select{unary|binary|unary or binary}2</b> operator"
182 " (has <b>%1</b> parameter<b>%s1</b>)"
183</pre>
184
185<p>These examples show some important points of format strings. You can use any
186 plain ASCII character in the diagnostic string except "%" without a problem,
187 but these are C strings, so you have to use and be aware of all the C escape
188 sequences (as in the second example). If you want to produce a "%" in the
189 output, use the "%%" escape sequence, like the third diagnostic. Finally,
190 clang uses the "%...[digit]" sequences to specify where and how arguments to
191 the diagnostic are formatted.</p>
192
193<p>Arguments to the diagnostic are numbered according to how they are specified
194 by the C++ code that <a href="#producingdiag">produces them</a>, and are
195 referenced by <tt>%0</tt> .. <tt>%9</tt>. If you have more than 10 arguments
196 to your diagnostic, you are doing something wrong. :). Unlike printf, there
197 is no requirement that arguments to the diagnostic end up in the output in
198 the same order as they are specified, you could have a format string with
199 <tt>"%1 %0"</tt> that swaps them, for example. The text in between the
200 percent and digit are formatting instructions. If there are no instructions,
201 the argument is just turned into a string and substituted in.</p>
202
203<p>Here are some "best practices" for writing the English format string:</p>
204
205<ul>
206<li>Keep the string short. It should ideally fit in the 80 column limit of the
207 <tt>DiagnosticKinds.def</tt> file. This avoids the diagnostic wrapping when
208 printed, and forces you to think about the important point you are conveying
209 with the diagnostic.</li>
210<li>Take advantage of location information. The user will be able to see the
211 line and location of the caret, so you don't need to tell them that the
212 problem is with the 4th argument to the function: just point to it.</li>
213<li>Do not capitalize the diagnostic string, and do not end it with a
214 period.</li>
215<li>If you need to quote something in the diagnostic string, use single
216 quotes.</li>
217</ul>
218
219<p>Diagnostics should never take random English strings as arguments: you
220shouldn't use <tt>"you have a problem with %0"</tt> and pass in things like
221<tt>"your argument"</tt> or <tt>"your return value"</tt> as arguments. Doing
222this prevents <a href="translation">translating</a> the Clang diagnostics to
223other languages (because they'll get random English words in their otherwise
224localized diagnostic). The exceptions to this are C/C++ language keywords
225(e.g. auto, const, mutable, etc) and C/C++ operators (<tt>/=</tt>). Note
226that things like "pointer" and "reference" are not keywords. On the other
227hand, you <em>can</em> include anything that comes from the user's source code,
228including variable names, types, labels, etc.</p>
229
230<!-- ==================================== -->
231<h4>Formatting a Diagnostic Argument</a></h4>
232<!-- ==================================== -->
233
234<p>Arguments to diagnostics are fully typed internally, and come from a couple
235different classes: integers, types, names, and random strings. Depending on
236the class of the argument, it can be optionally formatted in different ways.
237This gives the DiagnosticClient information about what the argument means
238without requiring it to use a specific presentation (consider this MVC for
239Clang :).</p>
240
241<p>Here are the different diagnostic argument formats currently supported by
242Clang:</p>
243
244<table>
245<tr><td colspan="2"><b>"s" format</b></td></tr>
246<tr><td>Example:</td><td><tt>"requires %1 parameter%s1"</tt></td></tr>
247<tr><td>Classes:</td><td>Integers</td></tr>
248<tr><td>Description:</td><td>This is a simple formatter for integers that is
249 useful when producing English diagnostics. When the integer is 1, it prints
250 as nothing. When the integer is not 1, it prints as "s". This allows some
251 simple grammar to be to be handled correctly, and eliminates the need to use
252 gross things like <tt>"rewrite %1 parameter(s)"</tt>.</td></tr>
253
254<tr><td colspan="2"><b>"select" format</b></td></tr>
255<tr><td>Example:</td><td><tt>"must be a %select{unary|binary|unary or binary}2
256 operator"</tt></td></tr>
257<tr><td>Classes:</td><td>Integers</td></tr>
258<tr><td>Description:</td><td>...</td></tr>
259
260<tr><td colspan="2"><b>"plural" format</b></td></tr>
Sebastian Redl68168562008-11-22 22:16:45 +0000261<tr><td>Example:</td><td><tt>"you have %1 %plural{1:mouse|:mice}1 connected to
262 your computer"</tt></td></tr>
Chris Lattner62fd2782008-11-22 21:41:31 +0000263<tr><td>Classes:</td><td>Integers</td></tr>
Sebastian Redl68168562008-11-22 22:16:45 +0000264<tr><td>Description:</td><td><p>This is a formatter for complex plural forms.
265 It is designed to handle even the requirements of languages with very
266 complex plural forms, as many Baltic languages have. The argument consists
267 of a series of expression/form pairs, separated by ':', where the first form
268 whose expression evaluates to true is the result of the modifier.</p>
269 <p>An expression can be empty, in which case it is always true. See the
270 example at the top. Otherwise, it is a series of one or more numeric
271 conditions, separated by ','. If any condition matches, the expression
272 matches. Each numeric condition can take one of three forms.</p>
273 <ul>
274 <li>number: A simple decimal number matches if the argument is the same
275 as the number. Example: <tt>"{1:mouse|:mice}"</tt></li>
276 <li>range: A range in square brackets matches if the argument is within
277 the range. Then range is inclusive both ends. Example:
278 <tt>"{0:none|1:one|[2,5]:some|:many}"</tt></li>
279 <li>modulo: A modulo operator is followed by a number, and equals sign
280 and either a number or a range. The tests are the same as for plain
281 numbers and ranges, but the argument is taken modulo the number first.
282 Example: <tt>"{%100=0:even hundred|%100=[1,50]:lower half|:everything
283 else}"</tt></li>
284 </ul>
285 <p>The parser is very unforgiving. A syntax error, even whitespace, will
286 abort, as will a failure to match the argument against any
287 expression.</p></td></tr>
Chris Lattner62fd2782008-11-22 21:41:31 +0000288
289
290</table>
291
292
293
294
295<!-- ===================================================== -->
296<h4><a name="#producingdiag">Producing the Diagnostic</a></h4>
297<!-- ===================================================== -->
298
299<p>SemaExpr.cpp example</p>
300
301
302<!-- ============================================================= -->
303<h4><a name="DiagnosticClient">The DiagnosticClient Interface</a></h4>
304<!-- ============================================================= -->
305
306<p>Clang command line, buffering, HTMLizing, etc.</p>
307
308<!-- ====================================================== -->
309<h4><a name="translation">Adding Translations to Clang</a></h4>
310<!-- ====================================================== -->
311
312<p>Not possible yet!</p>
313
314
Chris Lattner86920d32007-07-31 05:42:17 +0000315<!-- ======================================================================= -->
316<h3 id="SourceLocation">The SourceLocation and SourceManager classes</h3>
317<!-- ======================================================================= -->
318
319<p>Strangely enough, the SourceLocation class represents a location within the
320source code of the program. Important design points include:</p>
321
322<ol>
323<li>sizeof(SourceLocation) must be extremely small, as these are embedded into
324 many AST nodes and are passed around often. Currently it is 32 bits.</li>
325<li>SourceLocation must be a simple value object that can be efficiently
326 copied.</li>
327<li>We should be able to represent a source location for any byte of any input
328 file. This includes in the middle of tokens, in whitespace, in trigraphs,
329 etc.</li>
330<li>A SourceLocation must encode the current #include stack that was active when
331 the location was processed. For example, if the location corresponds to a
332 token, it should contain the set of #includes active when the token was
333 lexed. This allows us to print the #include stack for a diagnostic.</li>
334<li>SourceLocation must be able to describe macro expansions, capturing both
335 the ultimate instantiation point and the source of the original character
336 data.</li>
337</ol>
338
339<p>In practice, the SourceLocation works together with the SourceManager class
340to encode two pieces of information about a location: it's physical location
341and it's virtual location. For most tokens, these will be the same. However,
342for a macro expansion (or tokens that came from a _Pragma directive) these will
343describe the location of the characters corresponding to the token and the
344location where the token was used (i.e. the macro instantiation point or the
345location of the _Pragma itself).</p>
346
347<p>For efficiency, we only track one level of macro instantions: if a token was
348produced by multiple instantiations, we only track the source and ultimate
349destination. Though we could track the intermediate instantiation points, this
350would require extra bookkeeping and no known client would benefit substantially
351from this.</p>
352
353<p>The clang front-end inherently depends on the location of a token being
354tracked correctly. If it is ever incorrect, the front-end may get confused and
355die. The reason for this is that the notion of the 'spelling' of a Token in
356clang depends on being able to find the original input characters for the token.
357This concept maps directly to the "physical" location for the token.</p>
358
359<!-- ======================================================================= -->
360<h2 id="liblex">The Lexer and Preprocessor Library</h2>
361<!-- ======================================================================= -->
362
363<p>The Lexer library contains several tightly-connected classes that are involved
364with the nasty process of lexing and preprocessing C source code. The main
365interface to this library for outside clients is the large <a
366href="#Preprocessor">Preprocessor</a> class.
367It contains the various pieces of state that are required to coherently read
368tokens out of a translation unit.</p>
369
370<p>The core interface to the Preprocessor object (once it is set up) is the
371Preprocessor::Lex method, which returns the next <a href="#Token">Token</a> from
372the preprocessor stream. There are two types of token providers that the
373preprocessor is capable of reading from: a buffer lexer (provided by the <a
374href="#Lexer">Lexer</a> class) and a buffered token stream (provided by the <a
Chris Lattner79281252008-03-09 02:27:26 +0000375href="#TokenLexer">TokenLexer</a> class).
Chris Lattner86920d32007-07-31 05:42:17 +0000376
377
378<!-- ======================================================================= -->
379<h3 id="Token">The Token class</h3>
380<!-- ======================================================================= -->
381
382<p>The Token class is used to represent a single lexed token. Tokens are
383intended to be used by the lexer/preprocess and parser libraries, but are not
384intended to live beyond them (for example, they should not live in the ASTs).<p>
385
386<p>Tokens most often live on the stack (or some other location that is efficient
387to access) as the parser is running, but occasionally do get buffered up. For
388example, macro definitions are stored as a series of tokens, and the C++
389front-end will eventually need to buffer tokens up for tentative parsing and
390various pieces of look-ahead. As such, the size of a Token matter. On a 32-bit
391system, sizeof(Token) is currently 16 bytes.</p>
392
393<p>Tokens contain the following information:</p>
394
395<ul>
396<li><b>A SourceLocation</b> - This indicates the location of the start of the
397token.</li>
398
399<li><b>A length</b> - This stores the length of the token as stored in the
400SourceBuffer. For tokens that include them, this length includes trigraphs and
401escaped newlines which are ignored by later phases of the compiler. By pointing
402into the original source buffer, it is always possible to get the original
403spelling of a token completely accurately.</li>
404
405<li><b>IdentifierInfo</b> - If a token takes the form of an identifier, and if
406identifier lookup was enabled when the token was lexed (e.g. the lexer was not
407reading in 'raw' mode) this contains a pointer to the unique hash value for the
408identifier. Because the lookup happens before keyword identification, this
409field is set even for language keywords like 'for'.</li>
410
411<li><b>TokenKind</b> - This indicates the kind of token as classified by the
412lexer. This includes things like <tt>tok::starequal</tt> (for the "*="
413operator), <tt>tok::ampamp</tt> for the "&amp;&amp;" token, and keyword values
414(e.g. <tt>tok::kw_for</tt>) for identifiers that correspond to keywords. Note
415that some tokens can be spelled multiple ways. For example, C++ supports
416"operator keywords", where things like "and" are treated exactly like the
417"&amp;&amp;" operator. In these cases, the kind value is set to
418<tt>tok::ampamp</tt>, which is good for the parser, which doesn't have to
419consider both forms. For something that cares about which form is used (e.g.
420the preprocessor 'stringize' operator) the spelling indicates the original
421form.</li>
422
423<li><b>Flags</b> - There are currently four flags tracked by the
424lexer/preprocessor system on a per-token basis:
425
426 <ol>
427 <li><b>StartOfLine</b> - This was the first token that occurred on its input
428 source line.</li>
429 <li><b>LeadingSpace</b> - There was a space character either immediately
430 before the token or transitively before the token as it was expanded
431 through a macro. The definition of this flag is very closely defined by
432 the stringizing requirements of the preprocessor.</li>
433 <li><b>DisableExpand</b> - This flag is used internally to the preprocessor to
434 represent identifier tokens which have macro expansion disabled. This
435 prevents them from being considered as candidates for macro expansion ever
436 in the future.</li>
437 <li><b>NeedsCleaning</b> - This flag is set if the original spelling for the
438 token includes a trigraph or escaped newline. Since this is uncommon,
439 many pieces of code can fast-path on tokens that did not need cleaning.
440 </p>
441 </ol>
442</li>
443</ul>
444
445<p>One interesting (and somewhat unusual) aspect of tokens is that they don't
446contain any semantic information about the lexed value. For example, if the
447token was a pp-number token, we do not represent the value of the number that
448was lexed (this is left for later pieces of code to decide). Additionally, the
449lexer library has no notion of typedef names vs variable names: both are
450returned as identifiers, and the parser is left to decide whether a specific
451identifier is a typedef or a variable (tracking this requires scope information
452among other things).</p>
453
454<!-- ======================================================================= -->
455<h3 id="Lexer">The Lexer class</h3>
456<!-- ======================================================================= -->
457
458<p>The Lexer class provides the mechanics of lexing tokens out of a source
459buffer and deciding what they mean. The Lexer is complicated by the fact that
460it operates on raw buffers that have not had spelling eliminated (this is a
461necessity to get decent performance), but this is countered with careful coding
462as well as standard performance techniques (for example, the comment handling
463code is vectorized on X86 and PowerPC hosts).</p>
464
465<p>The lexer has a couple of interesting modal features:</p>
466
467<ul>
468<li>The lexer can operate in 'raw' mode. This mode has several features that
469 make it possible to quickly lex the file (e.g. it stops identifier lookup,
470 doesn't specially handle preprocessor tokens, handles EOF differently, etc).
471 This mode is used for lexing within an "<tt>#if 0</tt>" block, for
472 example.</li>
473<li>The lexer can capture and return comments as tokens. This is required to
474 support the -C preprocessor mode, which passes comments through, and is
475 used by the diagnostic checker to identifier expect-error annotations.</li>
476<li>The lexer can be in ParsingFilename mode, which happens when preprocessing
Chris Lattner84386242007-09-16 19:25:23 +0000477 after reading a #include directive. This mode changes the parsing of '&lt;'
Chris Lattner86920d32007-07-31 05:42:17 +0000478 to return an "angled string" instead of a bunch of tokens for each thing
479 within the filename.</li>
480<li>When parsing a preprocessor directive (after "<tt>#</tt>") the
481 ParsingPreprocessorDirective mode is entered. This changes the parser to
482 return EOM at a newline.</li>
483<li>The Lexer uses a LangOptions object to know whether trigraphs are enabled,
484 whether C++ or ObjC keywords are recognized, etc.</li>
485</ul>
486
487<p>In addition to these modes, the lexer keeps track of a couple of other
488 features that are local to a lexed buffer, which change as the buffer is
489 lexed:</p>
490
491<ul>
492<li>The Lexer uses BufferPtr to keep track of the current character being
493 lexed.</li>
494<li>The Lexer uses IsAtStartOfLine to keep track of whether the next lexed token
495 will start with its "start of line" bit set.</li>
496<li>The Lexer keeps track of the current #if directives that are active (which
497 can be nested).</li>
498<li>The Lexer keeps track of an <a href="#MultipleIncludeOpt">
499 MultipleIncludeOpt</a> object, which is used to
500 detect whether the buffer uses the standard "<tt>#ifndef XX</tt> /
501 <tt>#define XX</tt>" idiom to prevent multiple inclusion. If a buffer does,
502 subsequent includes can be ignored if the XX macro is defined.</li>
503</ul>
504
505<!-- ======================================================================= -->
Chris Lattner79281252008-03-09 02:27:26 +0000506<h3 id="TokenLexer">The TokenLexer class</h3>
Chris Lattner86920d32007-07-31 05:42:17 +0000507<!-- ======================================================================= -->
508
Chris Lattner79281252008-03-09 02:27:26 +0000509<p>The TokenLexer class is a token provider that returns tokens from a list
Chris Lattner86920d32007-07-31 05:42:17 +0000510of tokens that came from somewhere else. It typically used for two things: 1)
511returning tokens from a macro definition as it is being expanded 2) returning
512tokens from an arbitrary buffer of tokens. The later use is used by _Pragma and
513will most likely be used to handle unbounded look-ahead for the C++ parser.</p>
514
515<!-- ======================================================================= -->
516<h3 id="MultipleIncludeOpt">The MultipleIncludeOpt class</h3>
517<!-- ======================================================================= -->
518
519<p>The MultipleIncludeOpt class implements a really simple little state machine
520that is used to detect the standard "<tt>#ifndef XX</tt> / <tt>#define XX</tt>"
521idiom that people typically use to prevent multiple inclusion of headers. If a
522buffer uses this idiom and is subsequently #include'd, the preprocessor can
523simply check to see whether the guarding condition is defined or not. If so,
524the preprocessor can completely ignore the include of the header.</p>
525
526
527
528<!-- ======================================================================= -->
529<h2 id="libparse">The Parser Library</h2>
530<!-- ======================================================================= -->
531
532<!-- ======================================================================= -->
533<h2 id="libast">The AST Library</h2>
534<!-- ======================================================================= -->
535
536<!-- ======================================================================= -->
537<h3 id="Type">The Type class and its subclasses</h3>
538<!-- ======================================================================= -->
539
540<p>The Type class (and its subclasses) are an important part of the AST. Types
541are accessed through the ASTContext class, which implicitly creates and uniques
542them as they are needed. Types have a couple of non-obvious features: 1) they
543do not capture type qualifiers like const or volatile (See
544<a href="#QualType">QualType</a>), and 2) they implicitly capture typedef
Chris Lattner8a2bc622007-07-31 06:37:39 +0000545information. Once created, types are immutable (unlike decls).</p>
Chris Lattner86920d32007-07-31 05:42:17 +0000546
547<p>Typedefs in C make semantic analysis a bit more complex than it would
548be without them. The issue is that we want to capture typedef information
549and represent it in the AST perfectly, but the semantics of operations need to
550"see through" typedefs. For example, consider this code:</p>
551
552<code>
553void func() {<br>
Bill Wendling30d17752007-10-06 01:56:01 +0000554&nbsp;&nbsp;typedef int foo;<br>
555&nbsp;&nbsp;foo X, *Y;<br>
556&nbsp;&nbsp;typedef foo* bar;<br>
557&nbsp;&nbsp;bar Z;<br>
558&nbsp;&nbsp;*X; <i>// error</i><br>
559&nbsp;&nbsp;**Y; <i>// error</i><br>
560&nbsp;&nbsp;**Z; <i>// error</i><br>
Chris Lattner86920d32007-07-31 05:42:17 +0000561}<br>
562</code>
563
564<p>The code above is illegal, and thus we expect there to be diagnostics emitted
565on the annotated lines. In this example, we expect to get:</p>
566
567<pre>
Chris Lattner8a2bc622007-07-31 06:37:39 +0000568<b>test.c:6:1: error: indirection requires pointer operand ('foo' invalid)</b>
Chris Lattner86920d32007-07-31 05:42:17 +0000569*X; // error
570<font color="blue">^~</font>
Chris Lattner8a2bc622007-07-31 06:37:39 +0000571<b>test.c:7:1: error: indirection requires pointer operand ('foo' invalid)</b>
Chris Lattner86920d32007-07-31 05:42:17 +0000572**Y; // error
573<font color="blue">^~~</font>
Chris Lattner8a2bc622007-07-31 06:37:39 +0000574<b>test.c:8:1: error: indirection requires pointer operand ('foo' invalid)</b>
575**Z; // error
576<font color="blue">^~~</font>
Chris Lattner86920d32007-07-31 05:42:17 +0000577</pre>
578
579<p>While this example is somewhat silly, it illustrates the point: we want to
580retain typedef information where possible, so that we can emit errors about
581"<tt>std::string</tt>" instead of "<tt>std::basic_string&lt;char, std:...</tt>".
582Doing this requires properly keeping typedef information (for example, the type
583of "X" is "foo", not "int"), and requires properly propagating it through the
Chris Lattner8a2bc622007-07-31 06:37:39 +0000584various operators (for example, the type of *Y is "foo", not "int"). In order
585to retain this information, the type of these expressions is an instance of the
586TypedefType class, which indicates that the type of these expressions is a
587typedef for foo.
588</p>
Chris Lattner86920d32007-07-31 05:42:17 +0000589
Chris Lattner8a2bc622007-07-31 06:37:39 +0000590<p>Representing types like this is great for diagnostics, because the
591user-specified type is always immediately available. There are two problems
592with this: first, various semantic checks need to make judgements about the
Chris Lattner33fc68a2007-07-31 18:54:50 +0000593<em>actual structure</em> of a type, ignoring typdefs. Second, we need an
594efficient way to query whether two types are structurally identical to each
595other, ignoring typedefs. The solution to both of these problems is the idea of
Chris Lattner8a2bc622007-07-31 06:37:39 +0000596canonical types.</p>
Chris Lattner86920d32007-07-31 05:42:17 +0000597
Chris Lattner62fd2782008-11-22 21:41:31 +0000598<!-- =============== -->
Chris Lattner8a2bc622007-07-31 06:37:39 +0000599<h4>Canonical Types</h4>
Chris Lattner62fd2782008-11-22 21:41:31 +0000600<!-- =============== -->
Chris Lattner86920d32007-07-31 05:42:17 +0000601
Chris Lattner8a2bc622007-07-31 06:37:39 +0000602<p>Every instance of the Type class contains a canonical type pointer. For
603simple types with no typedefs involved (e.g. "<tt>int</tt>", "<tt>int*</tt>",
604"<tt>int**</tt>"), the type just points to itself. For types that have a
605typedef somewhere in their structure (e.g. "<tt>foo</tt>", "<tt>foo*</tt>",
606"<tt>foo**</tt>", "<tt>bar</tt>"), the canonical type pointer points to their
607structurally equivalent type without any typedefs (e.g. "<tt>int</tt>",
608"<tt>int*</tt>", "<tt>int**</tt>", and "<tt>int*</tt>" respectively).</p>
Chris Lattner86920d32007-07-31 05:42:17 +0000609
Chris Lattner8a2bc622007-07-31 06:37:39 +0000610<p>This design provides a constant time operation (dereferencing the canonical
611type pointer) that gives us access to the structure of types. For example,
612we can trivially tell that "bar" and "foo*" are the same type by dereferencing
613their canonical type pointers and doing a pointer comparison (they both point
614to the single "<tt>int*</tt>" type).</p>
615
616<p>Canonical types and typedef types bring up some complexities that must be
617carefully managed. Specifically, the "isa/cast/dyncast" operators generally
618shouldn't be used in code that is inspecting the AST. For example, when type
619checking the indirection operator (unary '*' on a pointer), the type checker
620must verify that the operand has a pointer type. It would not be correct to
621check that with "<tt>isa&lt;PointerType&gt;(SubExpr-&gt;getType())</tt>",
622because this predicate would fail if the subexpression had a typedef type.</p>
623
624<p>The solution to this problem are a set of helper methods on Type, used to
625check their properties. In this case, it would be correct to use
626"<tt>SubExpr-&gt;getType()-&gt;isPointerType()</tt>" to do the check. This
627predicate will return true if the <em>canonical type is a pointer</em>, which is
628true any time the type is structurally a pointer type. The only hard part here
629is remembering not to use the <tt>isa/cast/dyncast</tt> operations.</p>
630
631<p>The second problem we face is how to get access to the pointer type once we
632know it exists. To continue the example, the result type of the indirection
633operator is the pointee type of the subexpression. In order to determine the
634type, we need to get the instance of PointerType that best captures the typedef
635information in the program. If the type of the expression is literally a
636PointerType, we can return that, otherwise we have to dig through the
637typedefs to find the pointer type. For example, if the subexpression had type
638"<tt>foo*</tt>", we could return that type as the result. If the subexpression
639had type "<tt>bar</tt>", we want to return "<tt>foo*</tt>" (note that we do
640<em>not</em> want "<tt>int*</tt>"). In order to provide all of this, Type has
Chris Lattner11406c12007-07-31 16:50:51 +0000641a getAsPointerType() method that checks whether the type is structurally a
Chris Lattner8a2bc622007-07-31 06:37:39 +0000642PointerType and, if so, returns the best one. If not, it returns a null
643pointer.</p>
644
645<p>This structure is somewhat mystical, but after meditating on it, it will
646make sense to you :).</p>
Chris Lattner86920d32007-07-31 05:42:17 +0000647
648<!-- ======================================================================= -->
649<h3 id="QualType">The QualType class</h3>
650<!-- ======================================================================= -->
651
652<p>The QualType class is designed as a trivial value class that is small,
653passed by-value and is efficient to query. The idea of QualType is that it
654stores the type qualifiers (const, volatile, restrict) separately from the types
655themselves: QualType is conceptually a pair of "Type*" and bits for the type
656qualifiers.</p>
657
658<p>By storing the type qualifiers as bits in the conceptual pair, it is
659extremely efficient to get the set of qualifiers on a QualType (just return the
660field of the pair), add a type qualifier (which is a trivial constant-time
661operation that sets a bit), and remove one or more type qualifiers (just return
662a QualType with the bitfield set to empty).</p>
663
664<p>Further, because the bits are stored outside of the type itself, we do not
665need to create duplicates of types with different sets of qualifiers (i.e. there
666is only a single heap allocated "int" type: "const int" and "volatile const int"
667both point to the same heap allocated "int" type). This reduces the heap size
668used to represent bits and also means we do not have to consider qualifiers when
669uniquing types (<a href="#Type">Type</a> does not even contain qualifiers).</p>
670
671<p>In practice, on hosts where it is safe, the 3 type qualifiers are stored in
672the low bit of the pointer to the Type object. This means that QualType is
673exactly the same size as a pointer, and this works fine on any system where
674malloc'd objects are at least 8 byte aligned.</p>
Ted Kremenek8bc05712007-10-10 23:01:43 +0000675
676<!-- ======================================================================= -->
Douglas Gregor2e1cd422008-11-17 14:58:09 +0000677<h3 id="DeclarationName">Declaration names</h3>
678<!-- ======================================================================= -->
679
680<p>The <tt>DeclarationName</tt> class represents the name of a
681 declaration in Clang. Declarations in the C family of languages can
682 take several different forms. Most declarations are named by are
683 simple identifiers, e.g., "<code>f</code>" and "<code>x</code>" in
684 the function declaration <code>f(int x)</code>. In C++, declaration
685 names can also name class constructors ("<code>Class</code>"
686 in <code>struct Class { Class(); }</code>), class destructors
687 ("<code>~Class</code>"), overloaded operator names ("operator+"),
688 and conversion functions ("<code>operator void const *</code>"). In
689 Objective-C, declaration names can refer to the names of Objective-C
690 methods, which involve the method name and the parameters,
691 collectively called a <i>selector</i>, e.g..,
692 "<code>setWidth:height:</code>". Since all of these kinds of
693 entities--variables, functions, Objective-C methods, C++
694 constructors, destructors, and operators---are represented as
695 subclasses of Clang's common <code>NamedDecl</code>
696 class, <code>DeclarationName</code> is designed to efficiently
697 represent any kind of name.</p>
698
699<p>Given
700 a <code>DeclarationName</code> <code>N</code>, <code>N.getNameKind()</code>
Douglas Gregor2def4832008-11-17 20:34:05 +0000701 will produce a value that describes what kind of name <code>N</code>
Douglas Gregore94ca9e42008-11-18 14:39:36 +0000702 stores. There are 8 options (all of the names are inside
Douglas Gregor2e1cd422008-11-17 14:58:09 +0000703 the <code>DeclarationName</code> class)</p>
704<dl>
705 <dt>Identifier</dt>
706 <dd>The name is a simple
707 identifier. Use <code>N.getAsIdentifierInfo()</code> to retrieve the
708 corresponding <code>IdentifierInfo*</code> pointing to the actual
709 identifier. Note that C++ overloaded operators (e.g.,
710 "<code>operator+</code>") are represented as special kinds of
711 identifiers. Use <code>IdentifierInfo</code>'s <code>getOverloadedOperatorID</code>
712 function to determine whether an identifier is an overloaded
713 operator name.</dd>
714
715 <dt>ObjCZeroArgSelector, ObjCOneArgSelector,
716 ObjCMultiArgSelector</dt>
717 <dd>The name is an Objective-C selector, which can be retrieved as a
718 <code>Selector</code> instance
719 via <code>N.getObjCSelector()</code>. The three possible name
720 kinds for Objective-C reflect an optimization within
721 the <code>DeclarationName</code> class: both zero- and
722 one-argument selectors are stored as a
723 masked <code>IdentifierInfo</code> pointer, and therefore require
724 very little space, since zero- and one-argument selectors are far
725 more common than multi-argument selectors (which use a different
726 structure).</dd>
727
728 <dt>CXXConstructorName</dt>
729 <dd>The name is a C++ constructor
730 name. Use <code>N.getCXXNameType()</code> to retrieve
731 the <a href="#QualType">type</a> that this constructor is meant to
732 construct. The type is always the canonical type, since all
733 constructors for a given type have the same name.</dd>
734
735 <dt>CXXDestructorName</dt>
736 <dd>The name is a C++ destructor
737 name. Use <code>N.getCXXNameType()</code> to retrieve
738 the <a href="#QualType">type</a> whose destructor is being
739 named. This type is always a canonical type.</dd>
740
741 <dt>CXXConversionFunctionName</dt>
742 <dd>The name is a C++ conversion function. Conversion functions are
743 named according to the type they convert to, e.g., "<code>operator void
744 const *</code>". Use <code>N.getCXXNameType()</code> to retrieve
745 the type that this conversion function converts to. This type is
746 always a canonical type.</dd>
Douglas Gregore94ca9e42008-11-18 14:39:36 +0000747
748 <dt>CXXOperatorName</dt>
749 <dd>The name is a C++ overloaded operator name. Overloaded operators
750 are named according to their spelling, e.g.,
751 "<code>operator+</code>" or "<code>operator new
752 []</code>". Use <code>N.getCXXOverloadedOperator()</code> to
753 retrieve the overloaded operator (a value of
754 type <code>OverloadedOperatorKind</code>).</dd>
Douglas Gregor2e1cd422008-11-17 14:58:09 +0000755</dl>
756
757<p><code>DeclarationName</code>s are cheap to create, copy, and
758 compare. They require only a single pointer's worth of storage in
Douglas Gregore94ca9e42008-11-18 14:39:36 +0000759 the common cases (identifiers, zero-
Douglas Gregor2e1cd422008-11-17 14:58:09 +0000760 and one-argument Objective-C selectors) and use dense, uniqued
761 storage for the other kinds of
762 names. Two <code>DeclarationName</code>s can be compared for
763 equality (<code>==</code>, <code>!=</code>) using a simple bitwise
764 comparison, can be ordered
765 with <code>&lt;</code>, <code>&gt;</code>, <code>&lt;=</code>,
766 and <code>&gt;=</code> (which provide a lexicographical ordering for
767 normal identifiers but an unspecified ordering for other kinds of
768 names), and can be placed into LLVM <code>DenseMap</code>s
769 and <code>DenseSet</code>s.</p>
770
771<p><code>DeclarationName</code> instances can be created in different
772 ways depending on what kind of name the instance will store. Normal
Douglas Gregore94ca9e42008-11-18 14:39:36 +0000773 identifiers (<code>IdentifierInfo</code> pointers) and Objective-C selectors
Douglas Gregor2e1cd422008-11-17 14:58:09 +0000774 (<code>Selector</code>) can be implicitly converted
775 to <code>DeclarationName</code>s. Names for C++ constructors,
Douglas Gregore94ca9e42008-11-18 14:39:36 +0000776 destructors, conversion functions, and overloaded operators can be retrieved from
Douglas Gregor2e1cd422008-11-17 14:58:09 +0000777 the <code>DeclarationNameTable</code>, an instance of which is
778 available as <code>ASTContext::DeclarationNames</code>. The member
779 functions <code>getCXXConstructorName</code>, <code>getCXXDestructorName</code>,
Douglas Gregore94ca9e42008-11-18 14:39:36 +0000780 <code>getCXXConversionFunctionName</code>, and <code>getCXXOperatorName</code>, respectively,
781 return <code>DeclarationName</code> instances for the four kinds of
Douglas Gregor2e1cd422008-11-17 14:58:09 +0000782 C++ special function names.</p>
783
784<!-- ======================================================================= -->
Ted Kremenek8bc05712007-10-10 23:01:43 +0000785<h3 id="CFG">The <tt>CFG</tt> class</h3>
786<!-- ======================================================================= -->
787
788<p>The <tt>CFG</tt> class is designed to represent a source-level
789control-flow graph for a single statement (<tt>Stmt*</tt>). Typically
790instances of <tt>CFG</tt> are constructed for function bodies (usually
791an instance of <tt>CompoundStmt</tt>), but can also be instantiated to
792represent the control-flow of any class that subclasses <tt>Stmt</tt>,
793which includes simple expressions. Control-flow graphs are especially
794useful for performing
795<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_flow_analysis#Sensitivities">flow-
796or path-sensitive</a> program analyses on a given function.</p>
797
Chris Lattner62fd2782008-11-22 21:41:31 +0000798<!-- ============ -->
Ted Kremenek8bc05712007-10-10 23:01:43 +0000799<h4>Basic Blocks</h4>
Chris Lattner62fd2782008-11-22 21:41:31 +0000800<!-- ============ -->
Ted Kremenek8bc05712007-10-10 23:01:43 +0000801
802<p>Concretely, an instance of <tt>CFG</tt> is a collection of basic
803blocks. Each basic block is an instance of <tt>CFGBlock</tt>, which
804simply contains an ordered sequence of <tt>Stmt*</tt> (each referring
805to statements in the AST). The ordering of statements within a block
806indicates unconditional flow of control from one statement to the
807next. <a href="#ConditionalControlFlow">Conditional control-flow</a>
808is represented using edges between basic blocks. The statements
809within a given <tt>CFGBlock</tt> can be traversed using
810the <tt>CFGBlock::*iterator</tt> interface.</p>
811
812<p>
Ted Kremenek18e17e72007-10-18 22:50:52 +0000813A <tt>CFG</tt> object owns the instances of <tt>CFGBlock</tt> within
Ted Kremenek8bc05712007-10-10 23:01:43 +0000814the control-flow graph it represents. Each <tt>CFGBlock</tt> within a
815CFG is also uniquely numbered (accessible
816via <tt>CFGBlock::getBlockID()</tt>). Currently the number is
817based on the ordering the blocks were created, but no assumptions
818should be made on how <tt>CFGBlock</tt>s are numbered other than their
819numbers are unique and that they are numbered from 0..N-1 (where N is
820the number of basic blocks in the CFG).</p>
821
Chris Lattner62fd2782008-11-22 21:41:31 +0000822<!-- ===================== -->
Ted Kremenek8bc05712007-10-10 23:01:43 +0000823<h4>Entry and Exit Blocks</h4>
Chris Lattner62fd2782008-11-22 21:41:31 +0000824<!-- ===================== -->
Ted Kremenek8bc05712007-10-10 23:01:43 +0000825
826Each instance of <tt>CFG</tt> contains two special blocks:
827an <i>entry</i> block (accessible via <tt>CFG::getEntry()</tt>), which
828has no incoming edges, and an <i>exit</i> block (accessible
829via <tt>CFG::getExit()</tt>), which has no outgoing edges. Neither
830block contains any statements, and they serve the role of providing a
831clear entrance and exit for a body of code such as a function body.
832The presence of these empty blocks greatly simplifies the
833implementation of many analyses built on top of CFGs.
834
Chris Lattner62fd2782008-11-22 21:41:31 +0000835<!-- ===================================================== -->
Ted Kremenek8bc05712007-10-10 23:01:43 +0000836<h4 id ="ConditionalControlFlow">Conditional Control-Flow</h4>
Chris Lattner62fd2782008-11-22 21:41:31 +0000837<!-- ===================================================== -->
Ted Kremenek8bc05712007-10-10 23:01:43 +0000838
839<p>Conditional control-flow (such as those induced by if-statements
840and loops) is represented as edges between <tt>CFGBlock</tt>s.
841Because different C language constructs can induce control-flow,
842each <tt>CFGBlock</tt> also records an extra <tt>Stmt*</tt> that
843represents the <i>terminator</i> of the block. A terminator is simply
844the statement that caused the control-flow, and is used to identify
845the nature of the conditional control-flow between blocks. For
846example, in the case of an if-statement, the terminator refers to
847the <tt>IfStmt</tt> object in the AST that represented the given
848branch.</p>
849
850<p>To illustrate, consider the following code example:</p>
851
852<code>
853int foo(int x) {<br>
854&nbsp;&nbsp;x = x + 1;<br>
855<br>
856&nbsp;&nbsp;if (x > 2) x++;<br>
857&nbsp;&nbsp;else {<br>
858&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;x += 2;<br>
859&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;x *= 2;<br>
860&nbsp;&nbsp;}<br>
861<br>
862&nbsp;&nbsp;return x;<br>
863}
864</code>
865
866<p>After invoking the parser+semantic analyzer on this code fragment,
867the AST of the body of <tt>foo</tt> is referenced by a
868single <tt>Stmt*</tt>. We can then construct an instance
869of <tt>CFG</tt> representing the control-flow graph of this function
870body by single call to a static class method:</p>
871
872<code>
873&nbsp;&nbsp;Stmt* FooBody = ...<br>
874&nbsp;&nbsp;CFG* FooCFG = <b>CFG::buildCFG</b>(FooBody);
875</code>
876
877<p>It is the responsibility of the caller of <tt>CFG::buildCFG</tt>
878to <tt>delete</tt> the returned <tt>CFG*</tt> when the CFG is no
879longer needed.</p>
880
881<p>Along with providing an interface to iterate over
882its <tt>CFGBlock</tt>s, the <tt>CFG</tt> class also provides methods
883that are useful for debugging and visualizing CFGs. For example, the
884method
885<tt>CFG::dump()</tt> dumps a pretty-printed version of the CFG to
886standard error. This is especially useful when one is using a
887debugger such as gdb. For example, here is the output
888of <tt>FooCFG->dump()</tt>:</p>
889
890<code>
891&nbsp;[ B5 (ENTRY) ]<br>
892&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Predecessors (0):<br>
893&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Successors (1): B4<br>
894<br>
895&nbsp;[ B4 ]<br>
896&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;1: x = x + 1<br>
897&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;2: (x > 2)<br>
898&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<b>T: if [B4.2]</b><br>
899&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Predecessors (1): B5<br>
900&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Successors (2): B3 B2<br>
901<br>
902&nbsp;[ B3 ]<br>
903&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;1: x++<br>
904&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Predecessors (1): B4<br>
905&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Successors (1): B1<br>
906<br>
907&nbsp;[ B2 ]<br>
908&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;1: x += 2<br>
909&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;2: x *= 2<br>
910&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Predecessors (1): B4<br>
911&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Successors (1): B1<br>
912<br>
913&nbsp;[ B1 ]<br>
914&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;1: return x;<br>
915&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Predecessors (2): B2 B3<br>
916&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Successors (1): B0<br>
917<br>
918&nbsp;[ B0 (EXIT) ]<br>
919&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Predecessors (1): B1<br>
920&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Successors (0):
921</code>
922
923<p>For each block, the pretty-printed output displays for each block
924the number of <i>predecessor</i> blocks (blocks that have outgoing
925control-flow to the given block) and <i>successor</i> blocks (blocks
926that have control-flow that have incoming control-flow from the given
927block). We can also clearly see the special entry and exit blocks at
928the beginning and end of the pretty-printed output. For the entry
929block (block B5), the number of predecessor blocks is 0, while for the
930exit block (block B0) the number of successor blocks is 0.</p>
931
932<p>The most interesting block here is B4, whose outgoing control-flow
933represents the branching caused by the sole if-statement
934in <tt>foo</tt>. Of particular interest is the second statement in
935the block, <b><tt>(x > 2)</tt></b>, and the terminator, printed
936as <b><tt>if [B4.2]</tt></b>. The second statement represents the
937evaluation of the condition of the if-statement, which occurs before
938the actual branching of control-flow. Within the <tt>CFGBlock</tt>
939for B4, the <tt>Stmt*</tt> for the second statement refers to the
940actual expression in the AST for <b><tt>(x > 2)</tt></b>. Thus
941pointers to subclasses of <tt>Expr</tt> can appear in the list of
942statements in a block, and not just subclasses of <tt>Stmt</tt> that
943refer to proper C statements.</p>
944
945<p>The terminator of block B4 is a pointer to the <tt>IfStmt</tt>
946object in the AST. The pretty-printer outputs <b><tt>if
947[B4.2]</tt></b> because the condition expression of the if-statement
948has an actual place in the basic block, and thus the terminator is
949essentially
950<i>referring</i> to the expression that is the second statement of
951block B4 (i.e., B4.2). In this manner, conditions for control-flow
952(which also includes conditions for loops and switch statements) are
953hoisted into the actual basic block.</p>
954
Chris Lattner62fd2782008-11-22 21:41:31 +0000955<!-- ===================== -->
956<!-- <h4>Implicit Control-Flow</h4> -->
957<!-- ===================== -->
Ted Kremenek8bc05712007-10-10 23:01:43 +0000958
959<!--
960<p>A key design principle of the <tt>CFG</tt> class was to not require
961any transformations to the AST in order to represent control-flow.
962Thus the <tt>CFG</tt> does not perform any "lowering" of the
963statements in an AST: loops are not transformed into guarded gotos,
964short-circuit operations are not converted to a set of if-statements,
965and so on.</p>
966-->
Ted Kremenek17a295d2008-06-11 06:19:49 +0000967
Chris Lattner7bad1992008-11-16 21:48:07 +0000968
969<!-- ======================================================================= -->
970<h3 id="Constants">Constant Folding in the Clang AST</h3>
971<!-- ======================================================================= -->
972
973<p>There are several places where constants and constant folding matter a lot to
974the Clang front-end. First, in general, we prefer the AST to retain the source
975code as close to how the user wrote it as possible. This means that if they
976wrote "5+4", we want to keep the addition and two constants in the AST, we don't
977want to fold to "9". This means that constant folding in various ways turns
978into a tree walk that needs to handle the various cases.</p>
979
980<p>However, there are places in both C and C++ that require constants to be
981folded. For example, the C standard defines what an "integer constant
982expression" (i-c-e) is with very precise and specific requirements. The
983language then requires i-c-e's in a lot of places (for example, the size of a
984bitfield, the value for a case statement, etc). For these, we have to be able
985to constant fold the constants, to do semantic checks (e.g. verify bitfield size
986is non-negative and that case statements aren't duplicated). We aim for Clang
987to be very pedantic about this, diagnosing cases when the code does not use an
988i-c-e where one is required, but accepting the code unless running with
989<tt>-pedantic-errors</tt>.</p>
990
991<p>Things get a little bit more tricky when it comes to compatibility with
992real-world source code. Specifically, GCC has historically accepted a huge
993superset of expressions as i-c-e's, and a lot of real world code depends on this
994unfortuate accident of history (including, e.g., the glibc system headers). GCC
995accepts anything its "fold" optimizer is capable of reducing to an integer
996constant, which means that the definition of what it accepts changes as its
997optimizer does. One example is that GCC accepts things like "case X-X:" even
998when X is a variable, because it can fold this to 0.</p>
999
1000<p>Another issue are how constants interact with the extensions we support, such
1001as __builtin_constant_p, __builtin_inf, __extension__ and many others. C99
1002obviously does not specify the semantics of any of these extensions, and the
1003definition of i-c-e does not include them. However, these extensions are often
1004used in real code, and we have to have a way to reason about them.</p>
1005
1006<p>Finally, this is not just a problem for semantic analysis. The code
1007generator and other clients have to be able to fold constants (e.g. to
1008initialize global variables) and has to handle a superset of what C99 allows.
1009Further, these clients can benefit from extended information. For example, we
1010know that "foo()||1" always evaluates to true, but we can't replace the
1011expression with true because it has side effects.</p>
1012
1013<!-- ======================= -->
1014<h4>Implementation Approach</h4>
1015<!-- ======================= -->
1016
1017<p>After trying several different approaches, we've finally converged on a
1018design (Note, at the time of this writing, not all of this has been implemented,
1019consider this a design goal!). Our basic approach is to define a single
1020recursive method evaluation method (<tt>Expr::Evaluate</tt>), which is
1021implemented in <tt>AST/ExprConstant.cpp</tt>. Given an expression with 'scalar'
1022type (integer, fp, complex, or pointer) this method returns the following
1023information:</p>
1024
1025<ul>
1026<li>Whether the expression is an integer constant expression, a general
1027 constant that was folded but has no side effects, a general constant that
1028 was folded but that does have side effects, or an uncomputable/unfoldable
1029 value.
1030</li>
1031<li>If the expression was computable in any way, this method returns the APValue
1032 for the result of the expression.</li>
1033<li>If the expression is not evaluatable at all, this method returns
1034 information on one of the problems with the expression. This includes a
1035 SourceLocation for where the problem is, and a diagnostic ID that explains
1036 the problem. The diagnostic should be have ERROR type.</li>
1037<li>If the expression is not an integer constant expression, this method returns
1038 information on one of the problems with the expression. This includes a
1039 SourceLocation for where the problem is, and a diagnostic ID that explains
1040 the problem. The diagnostic should be have EXTENSION type.</li>
1041</ul>
1042
1043<p>This information gives various clients the flexibility that they want, and we
1044will eventually have some helper methods for various extensions. For example,
1045Sema should have a <tt>Sema::VerifyIntegerConstantExpression</tt> method, which
1046calls Evaluate on the expression. If the expression is not foldable, the error
1047is emitted, and it would return true. If the expression is not an i-c-e, the
1048EXTENSION diagnostic is emitted. Finally it would return false to indicate that
1049the AST is ok.</p>
1050
1051<p>Other clients can use the information in other ways, for example, codegen can
1052just use expressions that are foldable in any way.</p>
1053
1054<!-- ========== -->
1055<h4>Extensions</h4>
1056<!-- ========== -->
1057
1058<p>This section describes how some of the various extensions clang supports
1059interacts with constant evaluation:</p>
1060
1061<ul>
1062<li><b><tt>__extension__</tt></b>: The expression form of this extension causes
1063 any evaluatable subexpression to be accepted as an integer constant
1064 expression.</li>
1065<li><b><tt>__builtin_constant_p</tt></b>: This returns true (as a integer
1066 constant expression) if the operand is any evaluatable constant.</li>
1067<li><b><tt>__builtin_choose_expr</tt></b>: The condition is required to be an
1068 integer constant expression, but we accept any constant as an "extension of
1069 an extension". This only evaluates one operand depending on which way the
1070 condition evaluates.</li>
1071<li><b><tt>__builtin_classify_type</tt></b>: This always returns an integer
1072 constant expression.</li>
1073<li><b><tt>__builtin_inf,nan,..</tt></b>: These are treated just like a
1074 floating-point literal.</li>
1075<li><b><tt>__builtin_abs,copysign,..</tt></b>: These are constant folded as
1076 general constant expressions.</li>
1077</ul>
1078
1079
1080
1081
Ted Kremenek17a295d2008-06-11 06:19:49 +00001082</div>
1083</body>
Douglas Gregor2e1cd422008-11-17 14:58:09 +00001084</html>