| |
| |
| Linux Test Project HOWTO |
| |
| 10 October 2000 |
| |
| Nate Straz |
| |
| Abstract |
| |
| This document explains some of the more in depth topics of |
| the Linux Test Project and related testing issues. It does |
| not cover basic installation procedures. See the INSTALL |
| and README files in the tarball for that information. |
| |
| 1 Preface |
| |
| This document was written to help bring the community up |
| to speed on the ins and outs of the Linux Test Project. |
| |
| 1.1 Copyright |
| |
| Copyright (c) 2000 by SGI, Inc. |
| |
| Please freely copy and distribute (sell or give away) this |
| document in any format. It's requested that corrections |
| and/or comments be fowarded to the document maintainer. |
| You may create a derivative work and distribute it provided |
| that you: |
| |
| * Send your derivative work (in the most suitable format |
| such as sgml) to the LDP (Linux Documentation Project) |
| or the like for posting on the Internet. If not the LDP, |
| then let the LDP know where it is available. |
| |
| * License the derivative work with this same license or use |
| GPL. Include a copyright notice and at least a pointer |
| to the license used. |
| |
| * Give due credit to previous authors and major contributors. |
| |
| If you're considering making a derived work other than a |
| translation, it's requested that you discuss your plans |
| with the current maintainer. |
| |
| 1.2 Disclaimer |
| |
| Use the information in this document at your own risk. I |
| disavow any potential liability for the contents of this |
| document. Use of the concepts, examples, and/or other content |
| of this document is entirely at your own risk. |
| |
| All copyrights are owned by their owners, unless specifically |
| noted otherwise. Use of a term in this document should |
| not be regarded as affecting the validity of any trademark |
| or service mark. |
| |
| Naming of particular products or brands should not be seen |
| as endorsements. |
| |
| You are strongly recommended to take a backup of your system |
| before major installation and backups at regular intervals. |
| |
| 2 Introduction |
| |
| 2.1 What is the Linux Test Project? |
| |
| The Linux Test Project (LTP) is an effort to create a set |
| of tools and tests to verify the functionality and stability |
| of the Linux kernel. We hope this will support Linux development |
| by making unit testing more complete and minimizing user |
| impact by building a barrier to keep bugs from making it |
| to the user. |
| |
| 2.2 What is wrong with the current testing model? |
| |
| The Linux development community utilizes two important (some |
| out argue most important) testing techniques in its normal |
| operations: Design and Code Inspections. The intent of LTP |
| is to support this by giving developers an ever growing |
| set of tools to help identify any operational problems in |
| their code that may be missed by human review. One of the |
| toughest categories of problems to catch with inspection |
| is that of interaction of features. With a continuously |
| improving set of tests and tools, developers can get an |
| indication of whether their changes may have broken some |
| other functionality. |
| |
| There is no such thing as a perfect test base. It is only |
| useful it if keeps up with new and changing functionality, |
| and if it actually gets used. |
| |
| 2.3 Are you doing benchmarking? |
| |
| Not at this time. We are more interested in functional, |
| regression, and stress testing the Linux kernel. Benchmarking |
| may be workable to compare the performance among kernel |
| versions. |
| |
| 2.4 Are you doing standards testing? |
| |
| No, we are leaving that to the Linux Standards Base (LSB). |
| See the Linux Standards Base [http://www.linuxbase.org/||web site] |
| for more information. |
| |
| 3 Structure |
| |
| The basic building block of the test project is a test case |
| that consists of a single action and a verification that |
| the action worked. The result of the test case is usually |
| restricted to PASS/FAIL. |
| |
| A test program is a runnable program that contains one or |
| more test cases. Test programs often understand command |
| line options which alter their behavior. The options could |
| determine the amount of memory tested, the location of temporary |
| files, the type of network packet used, or any other useful |
| parameter. |
| |
| Test tags are used to pair a unique identifier with a test |
| program and a set of command line options. Test tags are |
| the basis for test suites. |
| |
| 4 Writing Tests |
| |
| Writing a test case is a lot easier than most people think. |
| Any code that you write to examine how a part of the kernel |
| works can be adapted into a test case. All that is needed |
| is a way to report the result of the action to the rest |
| of the world. There are several ways of doing this, some |
| more involved than others. |
| |
| 4.1 Exit Style Tests |
| |
| Probably the simplest way of reporting the results of a test |
| case is the exit status of your program. If your test program |
| encounters unexpected or incorrect results, exit the test |
| program with a non-zero exit status, i.e. exit(1). Conversely, |
| if your program completes as expected, return a zero exit |
| status, i.e. exit(0). Any test driver should be able to |
| handle this type of error reporting. If a test program has |
| multiple test cases you won't know which test case failed, |
| but you will know the program that failed. |
| |
| 4.2 Formatted Output Tests |
| |
| The next easiest way of reporting the results is to write |
| the results of each test case to standard output. This allows |
| for the testing results to be more understandable to both |
| the tester and the analysis tools. When the results are |
| written in a standard way, tools can be used to analyze |
| the results. |
| |
| 5 Testing Tools |
| |
| The Linux Test Project has not yet decided on a "final" test |
| harness. We have provided a simple solution with ltp-pan to |
| make due until a complete solution has been found/created |
| that compliments the Linux kernel development process. |
| Several people have said we should use such and such a test |
| harness. Until we find we need a large complex test harness, |
| we will apply the KISS concept. |
| |
| 5.1 Ltp-pan |
| |
| Ltp-pan is a simple test driver with the ability to keep track |
| of orphaned processes and capture test output. It works |
| by reading a list of test tags and command lines and runs |
| them. By default ltp-pan will select a command randomly from |
| the list of test tags, wait for it to finish. Through command |
| line options you can run through the entire list sequentially, |
| run n tests, keep n test running at all times, and buffer |
| test output. Ltp-pan can be nested to create very complex test |
| environments. |
| |
| Ltp-pan uses an active file, also called a zoo file to keep track |
| of which tests are currently running. This file holds the |
| pid, tag, and a portion of the command line. When you start |
| ltp-pan it becomes a test tag in itself, thus it requires a |
| name for itself. Ltp-pan updates the active file to show which |
| test tags are currently running. When a test tag exits, |
| ltp-pan will overwrite the first character with a '#'. The active |
| file can be shared between multiple instances of ltp-pan so |
| you know which tests were running when the system crashes |
| by looking at one file. |
| |
| A ltp-pan file contains a list of test tags for ltp-pan to run. The |
| format of a ltp-pan file is as follows: |
| |
| testtag testprogram -o one -p two other command line options |
| |
| # This is a comment. It is a good idea to describe the test |
| |
| # tags in your ltp-pan file. Tests programs can have different |
| |
| # behaviors depending on the command line options so it is |
| |
| # helpful to describe what each test tag is meant to verify |
| or # provoke. |
| |
| # Some more test cases |
| |
| mm01 mmap001 -m 10000 |
| |
| # 40 Mb mmap() test. |
| |
| # Creates a 10000 page mmap, touches all of the map, sync's |
| |
| # it, and munmap()s it. |
| |
| mm03 mmap001 -i 0 -I 1 -m 100 |
| |
| # repetitive mmapping test. |
| |
| # Creates a one page map repetitively for one minute. |
| |
| dup02 dup02 |
| |
| # Negative test for dup(2) with bad fd |
| |
| kill09 kill09 |
| |
| # Basic test for kill(2) |
| |
| fs-suite01 ltp-pan -e -a fs-suite01.zoo -n fs-suite01 -f runtest/fs |
| |
| # run the entire set of file system tests |
| |
| The test tags are simple identifiers, no spaces are allowed. |
| The test of the line is the program to run, which is done |
| using execvp(3). Lines starting with '#' are comments and |
| ignored by ltp-pan. It is a good practice to include descriptions |
| with your test tags so you can have a reminder what a certain |
| obscure test tag tries to do. |
| |
| 5.1.1 Examples |
| |
| The most basic way to run ltp-pan is by passing the test program |
| and parameters on the command line. This will run the single |
| program once and wrap the output. |
| |
| $ ltp-pan -a ltp.zoo -n tutor sleep 4 |
| |
| <<<test_start>>> |
| |
| tag=cmdln stime=971450564 |
| |
| cmdline="sleep 4" |
| |
| contacts="" |
| |
| analysis=exit |
| |
| initiation_status="ok" |
| |
| <<<test_output>>> |
| |
| <<<execution_status>>> |
| |
| duration=103341903 termination_type=exited termination_id=0 |
| corefile=no cutime=0 cstime=0 |
| |
| <<<test_end>>> |
| |
| $ cat ltp.zoo |
| |
| #9357,tutor,pan/ltp-pan -a ltp.zoo -n tutor sleep 4 |
| |
| #9358,cmdln,sleep 4 |
| |
| $ |
| |
| How it works |
| |
| This example shows the two parameters that are always required |
| by ltp-pan, the active file and a test tag for ltp-pan. The "sleep |
| 4" on the end of the command line is a test program and |
| parameters that ltp-pan should run. This test is given the tag |
| "cmdln." Ltp-pan will run one test randomly, which ends |
| up being cmdln since it is the only test that we told ltp-pan |
| about. |
| |
| In the active file, ltp.zoo, ltp-pan writes the pid, test tag, |
| and part of the command line for the currently running tests. |
| The command lines are truncated so each line will fit on |
| an 80 column display. When a test tag finishes, ltp-pan will |
| place a '#' at the beginning of the line to mark it as available. |
| Here you can see that cmdln and tutor, the name we gave |
| ltp-pan, ran to completion. If the computer hangs, you can read |
| this file to see which test programs were running. |
| |
| We have run one test once. Let's do something a little more |
| exciting. Let's run one test several times, at the same |
| time. |
| |
| $ ltp-pan -a ltp.zoo -n tutor -x 3 -s 3 -O /tmp sleep 1 |
| |
| <<<test_start>>> |
| |
| tag=cmdln stime=971465653 |
| |
| cmdline="sleep 1" |
| |
| contacts="" |
| |
| analysis=exit |
| |
| initiation_status="ok" |
| |
| <<<test_output>>> |
| |
| |
| |
| <<<execution_status>>> |
| |
| duration=103326814 termination_type=exited termination_id=0 |
| corefile=no |
| |
| cutime=1 cstime=0 |
| |
| <<<test_end>>> |
| |
| <<<test_start>>> |
| |
| tag=cmdln stime=971465653 |
| |
| cmdline="sleep 1" |
| |
| contacts="" |
| |
| analysis=exit |
| |
| initiation_status="ok" |
| |
| <<<test_output>>> |
| |
| |
| |
| <<<execution_status>>> |
| |
| duration=103326814 termination_type=exited termination_id=0 |
| corefile=no |
| |
| cutime=0 cstime=1 |
| |
| <<<test_end>>> |
| |
| <<<test_start>>> |
| |
| tag=cmdln stime=971465653 |
| |
| cmdline="sleep 1" |
| |
| contacts="" |
| |
| analysis=exit |
| |
| initiation_status="ok" |
| |
| <<<test_output>>> |
| |
| |
| |
| <<<execution_status>>> |
| |
| duration=103326814 termination_type=exited termination_id=0 |
| corefile=no |
| |
| cutime=0 cstime=0 |
| |
| <<<test_end>>> |
| |
| How it works |
| |
| In this example we run another fake test from the command |
| line, but we run it three times (-s 3) and keep three test |
| tags active at the same time (-x 3). The -O parameter is |
| a directory where temporary files can be created to buffer |
| the output of each test tag. You can see in the output that |
| cmdln ran three times. If the -O option were omitted, your |
| test output would be mixed, making it almost worthless. |
| |
| * Using a ltp-pan file to run multiple tests |
| |
| * Nesting ltp-pan |
| |
| For more information on ltp-pan see the man page doc/man1/ltp-pan.1. |
| |
| 5.2 Scanner |
| |
| Ltp-scanner is a results analysis tool that understands the rts |
| style output which ltp-pan generates by default. It will produce |
| a table summarizing which tests passed and which failed. |
| |
| |
| 5.3 The Quick-hitter Package |
| |
| Many of the tests released use the Quick-hitter test package |
| to perform tasks like create and move to a temporary directory, |
| handle some common command line parameters, loop, run in |
| parallel, handle signals, and clean up. |
| |
| There is an example test case, doc/examples/quickhit.c, which |
| shows how the quick-hitter package can be used. The file |
| is meant to be a supplement to the documentation, not a |
| working test case. Use any of the tests in tests/ as a template. |
| |
| 6 To Do |
| |
| There are a lot of things that still need to be done to make |
| this a complete kernel testing system. The following sections |
| will discuss some of the to do items in detail. |
| |
| 6.1 Configuration Analysis |
| |
| While the number of configuration options for the Linux kernel |
| is seen as a strength to developers and users alike, it |
| is a curse to testers. To create a powerful automated testing |
| system, we need to be able to determine what the configuration |
| on the booted box is and then determine which tests should |
| be run on that box. |
| |
| The Linux kernel has hundreds of configuration options that |
| can be set to compile the kernel. There are more options |
| that can be set when you boot the kernel and while it is |
| running. There are also many patches that can be applied |
| to the kernel to add functionality or change behavior. |
| |
| 6.2 Result Comparison |
| |
| A lot of testing will be done in the life of the Linux Test |
| Project. Keeping track of the results from all the testing |
| will require some infrastructure. It would be nice to take |
| that output from a test machine, feed it to a program and |
| receive a list of items that broke since the last run on |
| that machine, or were fixed, or work on another test machine |
| but not on this one. |
| |
| 7 Contact information and updates |
| |
| URL: http://ltp.sourceforge.net/ |
| |
| mailing list: ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net |
| |
| list archive: https://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=ltp-list |
| |
| Questions and comments should be sent to the LTP mailing |
| list at ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net. To subscribe, please go to |
| https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list. |
| |
| The source is also available via CVS. See the web site for |
| a web interface and check out instructions. |
| |
| 8 Glossary |
| |
| Test IEEE/ANSI([footnote] Kit, Edward, Software Testing in the Real World: |
| Improving the Process. P. 82. ACM Press, 1995.) : |
| (i) An activity in which a system or component is executed |
| under specified conditions, the results are observed or |
| record, and an evaluation is made of some aspect of the |
| system or component. |
| (ii) A set of one or more test cases. |
| |
| Test Case A test assertion with a single result that |
| is being verified. This allows designations such as PASS |
| or FAIL to be applied to a single bit of functionality. |
| A single test case may be one of many test cases for |
| testing the complete functionality of a system. |
| IEEE/ANSI: |
| (i)A set of test inputs, execution conditions, and expected |
| results developed for a particular objective. |
| (ii) The smallest entity that is always executed as a unit, |
| from beginning to end. |
| |
| Test Driver A program that handles the execution of |
| test programs. It is responsible for starting the test |
| programs, capturing their output, and recording their |
| results. Ltp-pan is an example of a test driver. |
| |
| Test Framework A mechanism for organizing a group of |
| tests. Frameworks may have complex or very simple API's, |
| drivers and result logging mechanisms. Examples of frameworks |
| are TETware and DejaGnu. |
| |
| Test Harness A Test harness is the mechanism that connects |
| a test program to a test framework. It may be a specification |
| of exit codes, or a set of libraries for formatting messages |
| and determining exit codes. In TETware, the tet_result() |
| API is the test harness. |
| |
| Test Program A single invokable program. A test program |
| can contain one or more test cases. The test harness's |
| API allows for reporting/analysis of the individual test |
| cases. |
| |
| Test Suite A collection of tests programs, assertions, |
| cases grouped together under a framework. |
| |
| Test Tag An identifier that corresponds to a command |
| line which runs a test. The tag is a single word that |
| matches a test program with a set of command line arguments. |