| |
| .. _introduction: |
| |
| ************ |
| Introduction |
| ************ |
| |
| This reference manual describes the Python programming language. It is not |
| intended as a tutorial. |
| |
| While I am trying to be as precise as possible, I chose to use English rather |
| than formal specifications for everything except syntax and lexical analysis. |
| This should make the document more understandable to the average reader, but |
| will leave room for ambiguities. Consequently, if you were coming from Mars and |
| tried to re-implement Python from this document alone, you might have to guess |
| things and in fact you would probably end up implementing quite a different |
| language. On the other hand, if you are using Python and wonder what the precise |
| rules about a particular area of the language are, you should definitely be able |
| to find them here. If you would like to see a more formal definition of the |
| language, maybe you could volunteer your time --- or invent a cloning machine |
| :-). |
| |
| It is dangerous to add too many implementation details to a language reference |
| document --- the implementation may change, and other implementations of the |
| same language may work differently. On the other hand, CPython is the one |
| Python implementation in widespread use (although alternate implementations |
| continue to gain support), and its particular quirks are sometimes worth being |
| mentioned, especially where the implementation imposes additional limitations. |
| Therefore, you'll find short "implementation notes" sprinkled throughout the |
| text. |
| |
| Every Python implementation comes with a number of built-in and standard |
| modules. These are documented in :ref:`library-index`. A few built-in modules |
| are mentioned when they interact in a significant way with the language |
| definition. |
| |
| |
| .. _implementations: |
| |
| Alternate Implementations |
| ========================= |
| |
| Though there is one Python implementation which is by far the most popular, |
| there are some alternate implementations which are of particular interest to |
| different audiences. |
| |
| Known implementations include: |
| |
| CPython |
| This is the original and most-maintained implementation of Python, written in C. |
| New language features generally appear here first. |
| |
| Jython |
| Python implemented in Java. This implementation can be used as a scripting |
| language for Java applications, or can be used to create applications using the |
| Java class libraries. It is also often used to create tests for Java libraries. |
| More information can be found at `the Jython website <http://www.jython.org/>`_. |
| |
| Python for .NET |
| This implementation actually uses the CPython implementation, but is a managed |
| .NET application and makes .NET libraries available. It was created by Brian |
| Lloyd. For more information, see the `Python for .NET home page |
| <http://pythonnet.sourceforge.net>`_. |
| |
| IronPython |
| An alternate Python for .NET. Unlike Python.NET, this is a complete Python |
| implementation that generates IL, and compiles Python code directly to .NET |
| assemblies. It was created by Jim Hugunin, the original creator of Jython. For |
| more information, see `the IronPython website <http://www.ironpython.net/>`_. |
| |
| PyPy |
| An implementation of Python written completely in Python. It supports several |
| advanced features not found in other implementations like stackless support |
| and a Just in Time compiler. One of the goals of the project is to encourage |
| experimentation with the language itself by making it easier to modify the |
| interpreter (since it is written in Python). Additional information is |
| available on `the PyPy project's home page <http://pypy.org/>`_. |
| |
| Each of these implementations varies in some way from the language as documented |
| in this manual, or introduces specific information beyond what's covered in the |
| standard Python documentation. Please refer to the implementation-specific |
| documentation to determine what else you need to know about the specific |
| implementation you're using. |
| |
| |
| .. _notation: |
| |
| Notation |
| ======== |
| |
| .. index:: BNF, grammar, syntax, notation |
| |
| The descriptions of lexical analysis and syntax use a modified BNF grammar |
| notation. This uses the following style of definition: |
| |
| .. productionlist:: * |
| name: `lc_letter` (`lc_letter` | "_")* |
| lc_letter: "a"..."z" |
| |
| The first line says that a ``name`` is an ``lc_letter`` followed by a sequence |
| of zero or more ``lc_letter``\ s and underscores. An ``lc_letter`` in turn is |
| any of the single characters ``'a'`` through ``'z'``. (This rule is actually |
| adhered to for the names defined in lexical and grammar rules in this document.) |
| |
| Each rule begins with a name (which is the name defined by the rule) and |
| ``::=``. A vertical bar (``|``) is used to separate alternatives; it is the |
| least binding operator in this notation. A star (``*``) means zero or more |
| repetitions of the preceding item; likewise, a plus (``+``) means one or more |
| repetitions, and a phrase enclosed in square brackets (``[ ]``) means zero or |
| one occurrences (in other words, the enclosed phrase is optional). The ``*`` |
| and ``+`` operators bind as tightly as possible; parentheses are used for |
| grouping. Literal strings are enclosed in quotes. White space is only |
| meaningful to separate tokens. Rules are normally contained on a single line; |
| rules with many alternatives may be formatted alternatively with each line after |
| the first beginning with a vertical bar. |
| |
| .. index:: lexical definitions, ASCII |
| |
| In lexical definitions (as the example above), two more conventions are used: |
| Two literal characters separated by three dots mean a choice of any single |
| character in the given (inclusive) range of ASCII characters. A phrase between |
| angular brackets (``<...>``) gives an informal description of the symbol |
| defined; e.g., this could be used to describe the notion of 'control character' |
| if needed. |
| |
| Even though the notation used is almost the same, there is a big difference |
| between the meaning of lexical and syntactic definitions: a lexical definition |
| operates on the individual characters of the input source, while a syntax |
| definition operates on the stream of tokens generated by the lexical analysis. |
| All uses of BNF in the next chapter ("Lexical Analysis") are lexical |
| definitions; uses in subsequent chapters are syntactic definitions. |
| |