| ******************************* |
| HOWTO Use Python in the web |
| ******************************* |
| |
| :Author: Marek Kubica |
| |
| .. topic:: Abstract |
| |
| This document shows how Python fits into the web. It presents some ways on |
| how to integrate Python with the web server and general practices useful for |
| developing web sites. |
| |
| |
| Programming for the Web has become a hot topic since the raise of the "Web 2.0", |
| which focuses on user-generated content on web sites. It has always been |
| possible to use Python for creating web sites, but it was a rather tedious task. |
| Therefore, many so-called "frameworks" and helper tools were created to help |
| developers creating sites faster and these sites being more robust. This HOWTO |
| describes some of the methods used to combine Python with a web server to create |
| dynamic content. It is not meant as a general introduction as this topic is far |
| too broad to be covered in one single document. However, a short overview of |
| the most popular libraries is provided. |
| |
| .. seealso:: |
| |
| While this HOWTO tries to give an overview over Python in the Web, it cannot |
| always be as up to date as desired. Web development in Python is moving |
| forward rapidly, so the wiki page on `Web Programming |
| <http://wiki.python.org/moin/WebProgramming>`_ might be more in sync with |
| recent development. |
| |
| |
| The low-level view |
| ================== |
| |
| .. .. image:: http.png |
| |
| When a user enters a web site, his browser makes a connection to the site's |
| webserver (this is called the *request*). The server looks up the file in the |
| file system and sends it back to the user's browser, which displays it (this is |
| the *response*). This is roughly how the unterlying protocol, HTTP works. |
| |
| Now, dynamic web sites are not files in the file system, but rather programs |
| which are run by the web server when a request comes in. They can do all sorts |
| of useful things, like display the postings of a bulletin board, show your |
| mails, configurate software or just display the current time. These programs |
| can be written in about any programming language the server supports, so it is |
| easy to use Python for creating dynamic web sites. |
| |
| As most of HTTP servers are written in C or C++, they cannot execute Python code |
| in a simple way -- a bridge is needed between the server and the program. These |
| bridges or rather interfaces define how programs interact with the server. In |
| the past there have been numerous attempts to create the best possible |
| interface, but there are only a few worth mentioning. |
| |
| Not every web server supports every interface. Many web servers do support only |
| old, now-obsolete interfaces. But they can often be extended using some |
| third-party modules to support new interfaces. |
| |
| |
| Common Gateway Interface |
| ------------------------ |
| |
| This interface is the oldest one, supported by nearly every web server out of |
| the box. Programs using CGI to communicate with their web server need to be |
| started by the server for every request. So, every request starts a new Python |
| interpreter -- which takes some time to start up -- thus making the whole |
| interface only usable for low load situations. |
| |
| The upside of CGI is that it is simple -- writing a program which uses CGI is a |
| matter of about three lines of code. But this simplicity comes at a price: it |
| does very few things to help the developer. |
| |
| Writing CGI programs, while still possible, is not recommended anymore. With |
| WSGI (more on that later) it is possible to write programs that emulate CGI, so |
| they can be run as CGI if no better option is available. |
| |
| .. seealso:: |
| |
| The Python standard library includes some modules that are helpful for |
| creating plain CGI programs: |
| |
| * :mod:`cgi` -- Handling of user input in CGI scripts |
| * :mod:`cgitb` -- Displays nice tracebacks when errors happen in of CGI |
| applications, instead of presenting a "500 Internal Server Error" message |
| |
| The Python wiki features a page on `CGI scripts |
| <http://wiki.python.org/moin/CgiScripts>`_ with some additional information |
| about CGI in Python. |
| |
| |
| Simple script for testing CGI |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ |
| |
| To test whether your web server works with CGI, you can use this short and |
| simple CGI program:: |
| |
| #!/usr/bin/env python |
| # -*- coding: UTF-8 -*- |
| |
| # enable debugging |
| import cgitb |
| cgitb.enable() |
| |
| print("Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8") |
| print() |
| |
| print("Hello World!") |
| |
| You need to write this code into a file with a ``.py`` or ``.cgi`` extension, |
| this depends on your web server configuration. Depending on your web server |
| configuration, this file may also need to be in a ``cgi-bin`` folder, for |
| security reasons. |
| |
| You might wonder what the ``cgitb`` line is about. This line makes it possible |
| to display a nice traceback instead of just crashing and displaying an "Internal |
| Server Error" in the user's browser. This is useful for debugging, but it might |
| risk exposing some confident data to the user. Don't use it when the script is |
| ready for production use. Still, you should *always* catch exceptions, and |
| display proper error pages -- end-users don't like to see nondescript "Internal |
| Server Errors" in their browsers. |
| |
| |
| Setting up CGI on your own server |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ |
| |
| If you don't have your own web server, this does not apply to you. You can |
| check whether if works as-is and if not you need to talk to the administrator of |
| your web server anyway. If it is a big hoster, you can try filing a ticket |
| asking for Python support. |
| |
| If you're your own administrator or want to install it for testing purposes on |
| your own computers, you have to configure it by yourself. There is no one and |
| single way on how to configure CGI, as there are many web servers with different |
| configuration options. The currently most widely used free web server is |
| `Apache HTTPd <http://httpd.apache.org/>`_, Apache for short -- this is the one |
| that most people use, it can be easily installed on nearly every system using |
| the systems' package management. But `lighttpd <http://www.lighttpd.net>`_ has |
| been gaining attention since some time and is said to have a better performance. |
| On many systems this server can also be installed using the package management, |
| so manually compiling the web server is never needed. |
| |
| * On Apache you can take a look into the `Dynamic Content with CGI |
| <http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/howto/cgi.html>`_ tutorial, where everything |
| is described. Most of the time it is enough just to set ``+ExecCGI``. The |
| tutorial also describes the most common gotchas that might arise. |
| * On lighttpd you need to use the `CGI module |
| <http://trac.lighttpd.net/trac/wiki/Docs%3AModCGI>`_ which can be configured |
| in a straightforward way. It boils down to setting ``cgi.assign`` properly. |
| |
| |
| Common problems with CGI scripts |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ |
| |
| Trying to use CGI sometimes leads to small annoyances that one might experience |
| while trying to get these scripts to run. Sometimes it happens that a seemingly |
| correct script does not work as expected, which is caused by some small hidden |
| reason that's difficult to spot. |
| |
| Some of these reasons are: |
| |
| * The Python script is not marked executable. When CGI scripts are not |
| executable most of the web servers will let the user download it, instead of |
| running it and sending the output to the user. For CGI scripts to run |
| properly the ``+x`` bit needs to be set. Using ``chmod a+x your_script.py`` |
| might already solve the problem. |
| * The line endings must be of Unix-type. This is important because the web |
| server checks the first line of the script (called shebang) and tries to run |
| the program specified there. It gets easily confused by Windows line endings |
| (Carriage Return & Line Feed, also called CRLF), so you have to convert the |
| file to Unix line endings (only Line Feed, LF). This can be done |
| automatically by uploading the file via FTP in text mode instead of binary |
| mode, but the preferred way is just telling your editor to save the files with |
| Unix line endings. Most proper editors support this. |
| * Your web server must be able to read the file, you need to make sure the |
| permissions are fine. Often the server runs as user and group ``www-data``, |
| so it might be worth a try to change the file ownership or making the file |
| world readable by using ``chmod a+r your_script.py``. |
| * The webserver must be able to know that the file you're trying to access is a |
| CGI script. Check the configuration of your web server, maybe there is some |
| mistake. |
| * The path to the interpreter in the shebang (``#!/usr/bin/env python``) must be |
| currect. This line calls ``/usr/bin/env`` to find Python, but it'll fail if |
| there is no ``/usr/bin/env``. If you know where your Python is installed, you |
| can also use that path. The commands ``whereis python`` and ``type -p |
| python`` might also help to find where it is installed. Once this is known, |
| the shebang line can be changed accordingly: ``#!/usr/bin/python``. |
| * The file must not contain a BOM (Byte Order Mark). The BOM is meant for |
| determining the byte order of UTF-16 encodings, but some editors write this |
| also into UTF-8 files. The BOM interferes with the shebang line, so be sure |
| to tell your editor not to write the BOM. |
| * :ref:`mod-python` might be making problems. mod_python is able to handle CGI |
| scripts by itself, but it can also be a source for problems. Be sure you |
| disable it. |
| |
| |
| .. _mod-python: |
| |
| mod_python |
| ---------- |
| |
| People coming from PHP often find it hard to grasp how to use Python in the web. |
| Their first thought is mostly `mod_python <http://www.modpython.org/>`_ because |
| they think that this is the equivalent to ``mod_php``. Actually it is not |
| really. It does embed the interpreter into the Apache process, thus speeding up |
| requests by not having to start a Python interpreter every request. On the |
| other hand, it is by far not "Python intermixed with HTML" as PHP often does. |
| The Python equivalent of that is a template engine. mod_python itself is much |
| more powerful and gives more access to Apache internals. It can emulate CGI, it |
| can work an a "Python Server Pages" mode similar to JSP which is "HTML |
| intermangled with Python" and it has a "Publisher" which destignates one file to |
| accept all requests and decide on what to do then. |
| |
| But mod_python has some problems. Unlike the PHP interpreter the Python |
| interpreter uses caching when executing files, so when changing a file the whole |
| web server needs to be re-started to update. Another problem ist the basic |
| concept -- Apache starts some child processes to handle the requests and |
| unfortunately every child process needs to load the whole Python interpreter |
| even if it does not use it. This makes the whole web server slower. Another |
| problem is that as mod_python is linked against a specific version of |
| ``libpython``, it is not possible to switch from an older version to a newer |
| (e.g. 2.4 to 2.5) without recompiling mod_python. mod_python is also bound to |
| the Apache web server, so programs written for mod_python cannot easily run on |
| other web servers. |
| |
| These are the reasons why mod_python should be avoided when writing new |
| programs. In some circumstances it might be still a good idea to use mod_python |
| for deployment, but WSGI makes it possible to run WSGI programs under mod_python |
| as well. |
| |
| |
| FastCGI and SCGI |
| ---------------- |
| |
| FastCGI and SCGI try to solve the performance problem of CGI in another way. |
| Instead of embedding the interpreter into the web server, they create |
| long-running processes which run in the background. There still is some module |
| in the web server which makes it possible for the web server to "speak" with the |
| background process. As the background process is independent from the server, |
| it can be written in any language of course also in Python. The language just |
| needs to have a library which handles the communication with the web server. |
| |
| The difference between FastCGI and SCGI is very small, as SCGI is essentially |
| just a "simpler FastCGI". But as the web server support for SCGI is limited |
| most people use FastCGI instead, which works the same way. Almost everything |
| that applies to SCGI also applies to FastCGI as well, so we'll only write about |
| the latter. |
| |
| These days, FastCGI is never used directly. Just like ``mod_python`` it is only |
| used for the deployment of WSGI applications. |
| |
| .. seealso:: |
| |
| * `FastCGI, SCGI, and Apache: Background and Future |
| <http://www.vmunix.com/mark/blog/archives/2006/01/02/fastcgi-scgi-and-apache-background-and-future/>`_ |
| is a discussion on why the concept of FastCGI and SCGI is better that that |
| of mod_python. |
| |
| |
| Setting up FastCGI |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ |
| |
| Depending on the web server you need to have a special module. |
| |
| * Apache has both `mod_fastcgi <http://www.fastcgi.com/>`_ and `mod_fcgid |
| <http://fastcgi.coremail.cn/>`_. ``mod_fastcgi`` is the original one, but it |
| has some licensing issues that's why it is sometimes considered non-free. |
| ``mod_fcgid`` is a smaller, compatible alternative. One of these modules needs |
| to be loaded by Apache. |
| * lighttpd ships its own `FastCGI module |
| <http://trac.lighttpd.net/trac/wiki/Docs%3AModFastCGI>`_ as well as an `SCGI |
| module <http://trac.lighttpd.net/trac/wiki/Docs%3AModSCGI>`_. |
| * nginx also supports `FastCGI |
| <http://wiki.codemongers.com/NginxSimplePythonFCGI>`_. |
| |
| Once you have installed and configured the module, you can test it with the |
| following WSGI-application:: |
| |
| #!/usr/bin/env python |
| # -*- coding: UTF-8 -*- |
| |
| import sys, os |
| from cgi import escape |
| from flup.server.fcgi import WSGIServer |
| |
| def app(environ, start_response): |
| start_response('200 OK', [('Content-Type', 'text/html')]) |
| |
| yield '<h1>FastCGI Environment</h1>' |
| yield '<table>' |
| for k, v in sorted(environ.items()): |
| yield '<tr><th>{0}</th><td>{1}</td></tr>'.format( |
| escape(k), escape(v)) |
| yield '</table>' |
| |
| WSGIServer(app).run() |
| |
| This is a simple WSGI application, but you need to install `flup |
| <http://pypi.python.org/pypi/flup/1.0>`_ first, as flup handles the low level |
| FastCGI access. |
| |
| .. seealso:: |
| |
| There is some documentation on `setting up Django with FastCGI |
| <http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/fastcgi/>`_, most of which can be |
| reused for other WSGI-compliant frameworks and libraries. Only the |
| ``manage.py`` part has to be changed, the example used here can be used |
| instead. Django does more or less the exact same thing. |
| |
| |
| mod_wsgi |
| -------- |
| |
| `mod_wsgi <http://www.modwsgi.org/>`_ is an attempt to get rid of the low level |
| gateways. As FastCGI, SCGI, mod_python are mostly used to deploy WSGI |
| applications anyway, mod_wsgi was started to directly embed WSGI aplications |
| into the Apache web server. The benefit from this approach is that WSGI |
| applications can be deployed much easier as is is specially designed to host |
| WSGI applications -- unlike the other low level methods which have glue code to |
| host WSGI applications (like flup which was mentioned before). The downside is |
| that mod_wsgi is limited to the Apache web server, other servers would need |
| their own implementations of mod_wsgi. |
| |
| It supports two modes: the embedded mode in which it integrates with the Apache |
| process and the daemon mode which is more FastCGI-like. Contrary to FastCGI, |
| mod_wsgi handles the worker-processes by itself which makes administration |
| easier. |
| |
| |
| .. _WSGI: |
| |
| Step back: WSGI |
| =============== |
| |
| WSGI was already mentioned several times so it has to be something important. |
| In fact it really is, so now it's time to explain. |
| |
| The *Web Server Gateway Interface*, :pep:`333` or WSGI for short is currently |
| the best possible way to Python web programming. While it is great for |
| programmers writing frameworks, the normal person does not need to get in direct |
| contact with it. But when choosing a framework for web development it is a good |
| idea to take one which supports WSGI. |
| |
| The big profit from WSGI is the unification. When your program is compatible |
| with WSGI -- that means that your framework has support for WSGI, your program |
| can be deployed on every web server interface for which there are WSGI wrappers. |
| So you do not need to care about whether the user uses mod_python or FastCGI -- |
| with WSGI it just works on any gateway interface. The Python standard library |
| contains its own WSGI server :mod:`wsgiref`, which is a small web server that |
| can be used for testing. |
| |
| A really great WSGI feature are the middlewares. Middlewares are layers around |
| your program which can add various functionality to it. There is a `number of |
| middlewares <http://wsgi.org/wsgi/Middleware_and_Utilities>`_ already available. |
| For example, instead of writing your own session management (to identify a user |
| in subsequent requests, as HTTP does not maintain state, so it does now know |
| that the requests belong to the same user) you can just take one middleware, |
| plug it in and you can rely an already existing functionality. The same thing |
| is compression -- say you want to compress your HTML using gzip, to save your |
| server's bandwidth. So you only need to plug-in a middleware and you're done. |
| Authentication is also a problem easily solved using a middleware. |
| |
| So, generally -- although WSGI may seem complex, the initial phase of learning |
| can be very rewarding as WSGI does already have solutions to many problems that |
| might arise while writing web sites. |
| |
| |
| WSGI Servers |
| ------------ |
| |
| The code that is used to connect to various low level gateways like CGI or |
| mod_python is called *WSGI server*. One of these servers is ``flup`` which was |
| already mentioned and supports FastCGI, SCGI as well as `AJP |
| <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_JServ_Protocol>`_. Some of these servers |
| are written in Python as ``flup`` is, but there also exist others which are |
| written in C and can be used as drop-in replacements. |
| |
| There are quite a lot of servers already available, so a Python web application |
| can be deployed nearly everywhere. This is one big advantage that Python has |
| compared with other web techniques. |
| |
| .. seealso:: |
| |
| A good overview of all WSGI-related code can be found in the `WSGI wiki |
| <http://wsgi.org/wsgi>`_, which contains an extensive list of `WSGI servers |
| <http://wsgi.org/wsgi/Servers>`_, which can be used by *every* application |
| supporting WSGI. |
| |
| You might be interested in some WSGI-supporting modules already contained in |
| the standard library, namely: |
| |
| * :mod:`wsgiref` -- some tiny utilities and servers for WSGI |
| |
| |
| Case study: MoinMoin |
| -------------------- |
| |
| What does WSGI give the web application developer? Let's take a look on one |
| long existing web application written in Python without using WSGI. |
| |
| One of the most widely used wiki software is `MoinMoin <http://moinmo.in/>`_. |
| It was created in 2000, so it predates WSGI by about three years. While it now |
| includes support for WSGI, older versions needed separate code to run on CGI, |
| mod_python, FastCGI and standalone. Now, this all is possible by using WSGI and |
| the already-written gateways. For running with on FastCGI ``flup`` can be used, |
| for running a standalone server :mod:`wsgiref` is the way to go. |
| |
| |
| Model-view-controller |
| ===================== |
| |
| The term *MVC* is often heard in statements like "framework *foo* supports MVC". |
| While MVC is not really something technical but rather organisational, many web |
| frameworks use this model to help the developer to bring structure into his |
| program. Bigger web applications can have lots of code so it is a good idea to |
| have structure in the program right from the beginnings. That way, even users |
| of other frameworks (or even languages, as MVC is nothing Python-specific) can |
| understand the existing code easier, as they are already familiar with the |
| structure. |
| |
| MVC stands for three components: |
| |
| * The *model*. This is the data that is meant to modify. In Python frameworks |
| this component is often represented by the classes used by the |
| object-relational mapper. So, all declarations go here. |
| * The *view*. This component's job is to display the data of the model to the |
| user. Typically this component is represented by the templates. |
| * The *controller*. This is the layer between the user and the model. The |
| controller reacts on user actions (like opening some specific URL) and tells |
| the model to modify the data if necessary. |
| |
| While one might think that MVC is a complex design pattern, in fact it is not. |
| It is used in Python because it has turned out to be useful for creating clean, |
| maintainable web sites. |
| |
| .. note:: |
| |
| While not all Python frameworks explicitly support MVC, it is often trivial |
| to create a web site which uses the MVC pattern by separating the data logic |
| (the model) from the user interaction logic (the controller) and the |
| templates (the view). That's why it is important not to write unnecessary |
| Python code in the templates -- it is against MVC and creates more chaos. |
| |
| .. seealso:: |
| |
| The english Wikipedia has an article about the `Model-View-Controller pattern |
| <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model-view-controller>`_, which includes a long |
| list of web frameworks for different programming languages. |
| |
| |
| Ingredients for web sites |
| ========================= |
| |
| Web sites are complex constructs, so tools were created to help the web site |
| developer to make his work maintainable. None of these tools are in any way |
| Python specific, they also exist for other programming languages as well. Of |
| course, developers are not forced to use these tools and often there is no |
| "best" tool, but it is worth informing yourself before choosing something |
| because of the big number of helpers that the developer can use. |
| |
| |
| .. seealso:: |
| |
| People have written far more components that can be combined than these |
| presented here. The Python wiki has a page about these components, called |
| `Web Components <http://wiki.python.org/moin/WebComponents>`_. |
| |
| |
| Templates |
| --------- |
| |
| Mixing of HTML and Python code is possible with some libraries. While |
| convenient at first, it leads to horribly unmaintainable code. That's why |
| templates exist. Templates are, in the simplest case, just HTML files with |
| placeholders. The HTML is sent to the user's browser after filling out the |
| placeholders. |
| |
| Python already includes such simple templates:: |
| |
| # a simple template |
| template = "<html><body><h1>Hello {who}!</h1></body></html>" |
| print(template.format(who="Reader")) |
| |
| The Python standard library also includes some more advanced templates usable |
| through :class:`string.Template`, but in HTML templates it is needed to use |
| conditional and looping contructs like Python's *for* and *if*. So, some |
| *template engine* is needed. |
| |
| Now, Python has a lot of template engines which can be used with or without a |
| `framework`_. Some of these are using a plain-text programming language which |
| is very easy to learn as it is quite limited while others use XML so the |
| template output is always guaranteed to be valid XML. Some `frameworks`_ ship |
| their own template engine or recommend one particular. If one is not yet sure, |
| using these is a good idea. |
| |
| .. note:: |
| |
| While Python has quite a lot of different template engines it usually does |
| not make sense to use a homebrewed template system. The time needed to |
| evaluate all templating systems is not really worth it, better invest the |
| time in looking through the most popular ones. Some frameworks have their |
| own template engine or have a recommentation for one. It's wise to use |
| these. |
| |
| Popular template engines include: |
| |
| * Mako |
| * Genshi |
| * Jinja |
| |
| .. seealso:: |
| |
| Lots of different template engines divide the attention between themselves |
| because it's easy to create them in Python. The page `Templating |
| <http://wiki.python.org/moin/Templating>`_ in the wiki lists a big, |
| ever-growing number of these. |
| |
| |
| Data persistence |
| ---------------- |
| |
| *Data persistence*, while sounding very complicated is just about storing data. |
| This data might be the text of blog entries, the postings of a bulletin board or |
| the text of a wiki page. As always, there are different ways to store |
| informations on a web server. |
| |
| Often relational database engines like `MySQL <http://www.mysql.com/>`_ or |
| `PostgreSQL <http://http://www.postgresql.org/>`_ are used due to their good |
| performance handling very large databases consisting of up to millions of |
| entries. These are *queried* using a language called `SQL |
| <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SQL>`_. Python programmers in general do not like |
| SQL too much, they prefer to work with objects. It is possible to save Python |
| objects into a database using a technology called `ORM |
| <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Object-relational_mapping>`_. ORM translates all |
| object-oriented access into SQL code under the hood, the user does not need to |
| think about it. Most `frameworks`_ use ORMs and it works quite well. |
| |
| A second possibility is using files that are saved on the hard disk (sometimes |
| called flatfiles). This is very easy, but is not too fast. There is even a |
| small database engine called `SQLite <http://www.sqlite.org/>`_ which is bundled |
| with Python in the :mod:`sqlite` module and uses only one file. This database |
| can be used to store objects via an ORM and has no other dependencies. For |
| smaller sites SQLite is just enough. But it is not the only way in which data |
| can be saved into the file systems. Sometimes normal, plain text files are |
| enough. |
| |
| The third and least used possibility are so-called object oriented databases. |
| These databases store the *actual objects* instead of the relations that |
| OR-mapping creates between rows in a database. This has the advantage that |
| nearly all objects can be saven in a straightforward way, unlike in relational |
| databases where some objects are very hard to represent with ORMs. |
| |
| `Frameworks`_ often give the users hints on which method to choose, it is |
| usually a good idea to stick to these unless there are some special requirements |
| which require to use the one method and not the other. |
| |
| .. seealso:: |
| |
| * `Persistence Tools <http://wiki.python.org/moin/PersistenceTools>`_ lists |
| possibilities on how to save data in the file system, some of these modules |
| are part of the standard library |
| * `Database Programming <http://wiki.python.org/moin/DatabaseProgramming>`_ |
| helps on choosing a method on how to save the data |
| * `SQLAlchemy <http://www.sqlalchemy.org/>`_, the most powerful OR-Mapper for |
| Python and `Elixir <http://elixir.ematia.de/>`_ which makes it easier to |
| use |
| * `SQLObject <http://www.sqlobject.org/>`_, another popular OR-Mapper |
| * `ZODB <https://launchpad.net/zodb>`_ and `Durus |
| <http://www.mems-exchange.org/software/durus/>`_, two object oriented |
| databases |
| |
| |
| .. _framework: |
| |
| Frameworks |
| ========== |
| |
| As web sites can easily become quite large, there are so-called frameworks which |
| were created to help the developer with making these sites. Although the most |
| well-known framework is Ruby on Rails, Python does also have its own frameworks |
| which are partly inspired by Rails or which were existing a long time before |
| Rails. |
| |
| Two possible approaches to web frameworks exist: the minimalistic approach and |
| the all-inclusive approach (somtimes called *full-stack*). Frameworks which are |
| all-inclusive give you everything you need to start working, like a template |
| engine, some way to save and access data in databases and many features more. |
| Most users are best off using these as they are widely used by lots of other |
| users and well documented in form of books and tutorials. Other web frameworks |
| go the minimalistic approach trying to be as flexible as possible leaving the |
| user the freedom to choose what's best for him. |
| |
| The majority of users is best off with all-inclusive framewors. They bring |
| everything along so a user can just jump in and start to code. While they do |
| have some limitations they can fullfill 80% of what one will ever want to |
| perfectly. They consist of various components which are designed to work |
| together as good as possible. |
| |
| The multitude of web frameworks written in Python demonstrates that it is really |
| easy to write one. One of the most well-known web applications written in |
| Python is `Zope <http://www.zope.org/>`_ which can be regarded as some kind of |
| big framework. But Zope was not the only framework, there were some others |
| which are by now nearly forgotten. These do not need to be mentioned anymore, |
| because most people that used them moved on to newer ones. |
| |
| |
| Some notable frameworks |
| ----------------------- |
| |
| There is an incredible number of frameworks, so there is no way to describe them |
| all. It is not even necessary, as most of these frameworks are nothing special |
| and everything that can be done with these can also be done with one of the |
| popular ones. |
| |
| |
| Django |
| ^^^^^^ |
| |
| `Django <http://www.djangoproject.com/>`_ is a framework consisting of several |
| tightly coupled elements which were written from scratch and work together very |
| well. It includes an ORM which is quite powerful while being simple to use and |
| has a great online administration interface which makes it possible to edit the |
| data in the database with a browser. The template engine is text-based and is |
| designed to be usable for page designers who cannot write Python. It supports |
| so-called template inheritance and filters (which work like Unix pipes). Django |
| has many handy features bundled, like creation of RSS feeds or generic views |
| which make it possible to write web sites nearly without any Python code. |
| |
| It has a big, international community which has created many sites using Django. |
| There are also quite a lot of add-on projects which extend Django's normal |
| functionality. This is partly due to Django's well written `online |
| documentation <http://doc.djangoproject.com/>`_ and the `Django book |
| <http://www.djangobook.com/>`_. |
| |
| |
| .. note:: |
| |
| Although Django is an MVC-style framework, it calls the components |
| differently, which is described in the `Django FAQ |
| <http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/faq/#django-appears-to-be-a-mvc-framework-but-you-call-the-controller-the-view-and-the-view-the-template-how-come-you-don-t-use-the-standard-names>`_. |
| |
| |
| TurboGears |
| ^^^^^^^^^^ |
| |
| The other popular web framework in Python is `TurboGears |
| <http://www.turbogears.org/>`_. It takes the approach of using already existing |
| components and combining them with glue code to create a seamless experience. |
| TurboGears gives the user more flexibility on which components to choose, the |
| ORM can be switched between some easy to use but limited and complex but very |
| powerful. Same goes for the template engine. One strong point about TurboGears |
| is that the components that it consists of can be used easily in other projects |
| without depending on TurboGears, for example the underlying web server CherryPy. |
| |
| The documentation can be found in the `TurboGears wiki |
| <http://docs.turbogears.org/>`_, where links to screencasts can be found. |
| TurboGears has also an active user community which can respond to most related |
| questions. There is also a `TurboGears book <http://turbogearsbook.com/>`_ |
| published, which is a good starting point. |
| |
| The plan for the next major version of TurboGears, version 2.0 is to switch to a |
| more flexible base provided by another very flexible web framework called |
| `Pylons <http://pylonshq.com/>`_. |
| |
| |
| Other notable frameworks |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ |
| |
| These two are of course not the only frameworks that are available, there are |
| also some less-popular frameworks worth mentioning. |
| |
| One of these is the already mentioned Zope, which has been around for quite a |
| long time. With Zope 2.x having been known as rather un-pythonic, the newer |
| Zope 3.x tries to change that and therefore gets more acceptance from Python |
| programmers. These efforts already showed results, there is a project which |
| connects Zope with WSGI called `Repoze <http://repoze.org/>`_ and another |
| project called `Grok <http://grok.zope.org/>`_ which makes it possible for |
| "normal" Python programmers use the very mature Zope components. |
| |
| Another framework that's already been mentioned is `Pylons`_. Pylons is much |
| like TurboGears with ab even stronger emphasis on flexibility, which is bought |
| at the cost of being more difficult to use. Nearly every component can be |
| exchanged, which makes it necessary to use the documentation of every single |
| component, because there are so many Pylons combinations possible that can |
| satisfy every requirement. Pylons builds upon `Paste |
| <http://pythonpaste.org/>`_, an extensive set of tools which are handy for WSGI. |
| |
| And that's still not everything. The most up-to-date information can always be |
| found in the Python wiki. |
| |
| .. seealso:: |
| |
| The Python wiki contains an extensive list of `web frameworks |
| <http://wiki.python.org/moin/WebFrameworks>`_. |
| |
| Most frameworks also have their own mailing lists and IRC channels, look out |
| for these on the projects' websites. There is also a general "Python in the |
| Web" IRC channel on freenode called `#python.web |
| <http://wiki.python.org/moin/PoundPythonWeb>`_. |