| :mod:`unittest.mock` --- getting started | 
 | ======================================== | 
 |  | 
 | .. moduleauthor:: Michael Foord <michael@python.org> | 
 | .. currentmodule:: unittest.mock | 
 |  | 
 | .. versionadded:: 3.3 | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | .. _getting-started: | 
 |  | 
 | Using Mock | 
 | ---------- | 
 |  | 
 | Mock Patching Methods | 
 | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | 
 |  | 
 | Common uses for :class:`Mock` objects include: | 
 |  | 
 | * Patching methods | 
 | * Recording method calls on objects | 
 |  | 
 | You might want to replace a method on an object to check that | 
 | it is called with the correct arguments by another part of the system: | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> real = SomeClass() | 
 |     >>> real.method = MagicMock(name='method') | 
 |     >>> real.method(3, 4, 5, key='value') | 
 |     <MagicMock name='method()' id='...'> | 
 |  | 
 | Once our mock has been used (`real.method` in this example) it has methods | 
 | and attributes that allow you to make assertions about how it has been used. | 
 |  | 
 | .. note:: | 
 |  | 
 |     In most of these examples the :class:`Mock` and :class:`MagicMock` classes | 
 |     are interchangeable. As the `MagicMock` is the more capable class it makes | 
 |     a sensible one to use by default. | 
 |  | 
 | Once the mock has been called its :attr:`~Mock.called` attribute is set to | 
 | `True`. More importantly we can use the :meth:`~Mock.assert_called_with` or | 
 | :meth:`~Mock.assert_called_once_with` method to check that it was called with | 
 | the correct arguments. | 
 |  | 
 | This example tests that calling `ProductionClass().method` results in a call to | 
 | the `something` method: | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> class ProductionClass(object): | 
 |     ...     def method(self): | 
 |     ...         self.something(1, 2, 3) | 
 |     ...     def something(self, a, b, c): | 
 |     ...         pass | 
 |     ... | 
 |     >>> real = ProductionClass() | 
 |     >>> real.something = MagicMock() | 
 |     >>> real.method() | 
 |     >>> real.something.assert_called_once_with(1, 2, 3) | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | Mock for Method Calls on an Object | 
 | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | 
 |  | 
 | In the last example we patched a method directly on an object to check that it | 
 | was called correctly. Another common use case is to pass an object into a | 
 | method (or some part of the system under test) and then check that it is used | 
 | in the correct way. | 
 |  | 
 | The simple `ProductionClass` below has a `closer` method. If it is called with | 
 | an object then it calls `close` on it. | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> class ProductionClass(object): | 
 |     ...     def closer(self, something): | 
 |     ...         something.close() | 
 |     ... | 
 |  | 
 | So to test it we need to pass in an object with a `close` method and check | 
 | that it was called correctly. | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> real = ProductionClass() | 
 |     >>> mock = Mock() | 
 |     >>> real.closer(mock) | 
 |     >>> mock.close.assert_called_with() | 
 |  | 
 | We don't have to do any work to provide the 'close' method on our mock. | 
 | Accessing close creates it. So, if 'close' hasn't already been called then | 
 | accessing it in the test will create it, but :meth:`~Mock.assert_called_with` | 
 | will raise a failure exception. | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | Mocking Classes | 
 | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | 
 |  | 
 | A common use case is to mock out classes instantiated by your code under test. | 
 | When you patch a class, then that class is replaced with a mock. Instances | 
 | are created by *calling the class*. This means you access the "mock instance" | 
 | by looking at the return value of the mocked class. | 
 |  | 
 | In the example below we have a function `some_function` that instantiates `Foo` | 
 | and calls a method on it. The call to `patch` replaces the class `Foo` with a | 
 | mock. The `Foo` instance is the result of calling the mock, so it is configured | 
 | by modify the mock :attr:`~Mock.return_value`. | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> def some_function(): | 
 |     ...     instance = module.Foo() | 
 |     ...     return instance.method() | 
 |     ... | 
 |     >>> with patch('module.Foo') as mock: | 
 |     ...     instance = mock.return_value | 
 |     ...     instance.method.return_value = 'the result' | 
 |     ...     result = some_function() | 
 |     ...     assert result == 'the result' | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | Naming your mocks | 
 | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | 
 |  | 
 | It can be useful to give your mocks a name. The name is shown in the repr of | 
 | the mock and can be helpful when the mock appears in test failure messages. The | 
 | name is also propagated to attributes or methods of the mock: | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> mock = MagicMock(name='foo') | 
 |     >>> mock | 
 |     <MagicMock name='foo' id='...'> | 
 |     >>> mock.method | 
 |     <MagicMock name='foo.method' id='...'> | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | Tracking all Calls | 
 | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | 
 |  | 
 | Often you want to track more than a single call to a method. The | 
 | :attr:`~Mock.mock_calls` attribute records all calls | 
 | to child attributes of the mock - and also to their children. | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> mock = MagicMock() | 
 |     >>> mock.method() | 
 |     <MagicMock name='mock.method()' id='...'> | 
 |     >>> mock.attribute.method(10, x=53) | 
 |     <MagicMock name='mock.attribute.method()' id='...'> | 
 |     >>> mock.mock_calls | 
 |     [call.method(), call.attribute.method(10, x=53)] | 
 |  | 
 | If you make an assertion about `mock_calls` and any unexpected methods | 
 | have been called, then the assertion will fail. This is useful because as well | 
 | as asserting that the calls you expected have been made, you are also checking | 
 | that they were made in the right order and with no additional calls: | 
 |  | 
 | You use the :data:`call` object to construct lists for comparing with | 
 | `mock_calls`: | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> expected = [call.method(), call.attribute.method(10, x=53)] | 
 |     >>> mock.mock_calls == expected | 
 |     True | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | Setting Return Values and Attributes | 
 | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | 
 |  | 
 | Setting the return values on a mock object is trivially easy: | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> mock = Mock() | 
 |     >>> mock.return_value = 3 | 
 |     >>> mock() | 
 |     3 | 
 |  | 
 | Of course you can do the same for methods on the mock: | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> mock = Mock() | 
 |     >>> mock.method.return_value = 3 | 
 |     >>> mock.method() | 
 |     3 | 
 |  | 
 | The return value can also be set in the constructor: | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> mock = Mock(return_value=3) | 
 |     >>> mock() | 
 |     3 | 
 |  | 
 | If you need an attribute setting on your mock, just do it: | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> mock = Mock() | 
 |     >>> mock.x = 3 | 
 |     >>> mock.x | 
 |     3 | 
 |  | 
 | Sometimes you want to mock up a more complex situation, like for example | 
 | `mock.connection.cursor().execute("SELECT 1")`. If we wanted this call to | 
 | return a list, then we have to configure the result of the nested call. | 
 |  | 
 | We can use :data:`call` to construct the set of calls in a "chained call" like | 
 | this for easy assertion afterwards: | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> mock = Mock() | 
 |     >>> cursor = mock.connection.cursor.return_value | 
 |     >>> cursor.execute.return_value = ['foo'] | 
 |     >>> mock.connection.cursor().execute("SELECT 1") | 
 |     ['foo'] | 
 |     >>> expected = call.connection.cursor().execute("SELECT 1").call_list() | 
 |     >>> mock.mock_calls | 
 |     [call.connection.cursor(), call.connection.cursor().execute('SELECT 1')] | 
 |     >>> mock.mock_calls == expected | 
 |     True | 
 |  | 
 | It is the call to `.call_list()` that turns our call object into a list of | 
 | calls representing the chained calls. | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | Raising exceptions with mocks | 
 | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | 
 |  | 
 | A useful attribute is :attr:`~Mock.side_effect`. If you set this to an | 
 | exception class or instance then the exception will be raised when the mock | 
 | is called. | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> mock = Mock(side_effect=Exception('Boom!')) | 
 |     >>> mock() | 
 |     Traceback (most recent call last): | 
 |       ... | 
 |     Exception: Boom! | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | Side effect functions and iterables | 
 | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | 
 |  | 
 | `side_effect` can also be set to a function or an iterable. The use case for | 
 | `side_effect` as an iterable is where your mock is going to be called several | 
 | times, and you want each call to return a different value. When you set | 
 | `side_effect` to an iterable every call to the mock returns the next value | 
 | from the iterable: | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> mock = MagicMock(side_effect=[4, 5, 6]) | 
 |     >>> mock() | 
 |     4 | 
 |     >>> mock() | 
 |     5 | 
 |     >>> mock() | 
 |     6 | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | For more advanced use cases, like dynamically varying the return values | 
 | depending on what the mock is called with, `side_effect` can be a function. | 
 | The function will be called with the same arguments as the mock. Whatever the | 
 | function returns is what the call returns: | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> vals = {(1, 2): 1, (2, 3): 2} | 
 |     >>> def side_effect(*args): | 
 |     ...     return vals[args] | 
 |     ... | 
 |     >>> mock = MagicMock(side_effect=side_effect) | 
 |     >>> mock(1, 2) | 
 |     1 | 
 |     >>> mock(2, 3) | 
 |     2 | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | Creating a Mock from an Existing Object | 
 | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | 
 |  | 
 | One problem with over use of mocking is that it couples your tests to the | 
 | implementation of your mocks rather than your real code. Suppose you have a | 
 | class that implements `some_method`. In a test for another class, you | 
 | provide a mock of this object that *also* provides `some_method`. If later | 
 | you refactor the first class, so that it no longer has `some_method` - then | 
 | your tests will continue to pass even though your code is now broken! | 
 |  | 
 | `Mock` allows you to provide an object as a specification for the mock, | 
 | using the `spec` keyword argument. Accessing methods / attributes on the | 
 | mock that don't exist on your specification object will immediately raise an | 
 | attribute error. If you change the implementation of your specification, then | 
 | tests that use that class will start failing immediately without you having to | 
 | instantiate the class in those tests. | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> mock = Mock(spec=SomeClass) | 
 |     >>> mock.old_method() | 
 |     Traceback (most recent call last): | 
 |        ... | 
 |     AttributeError: object has no attribute 'old_method' | 
 |  | 
 | If you want a stronger form of specification that prevents the setting | 
 | of arbitrary attributes as well as the getting of them then you can use | 
 | `spec_set` instead of `spec`. | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | Patch Decorators | 
 | ---------------- | 
 |  | 
 | .. note:: | 
 |  | 
 |    With `patch` it matters that you patch objects in the namespace where they | 
 |    are looked up. This is normally straightforward, but for a quick guide | 
 |    read :ref:`where to patch <where-to-patch>`. | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | A common need in tests is to patch a class attribute or a module attribute, | 
 | for example patching a builtin or patching a class in a module to test that it | 
 | is instantiated. Modules and classes are effectively global, so patching on | 
 | them has to be undone after the test or the patch will persist into other | 
 | tests and cause hard to diagnose problems. | 
 |  | 
 | mock provides three convenient decorators for this: `patch`, `patch.object` and | 
 | `patch.dict`. `patch` takes a single string, of the form | 
 | `package.module.Class.attribute` to specify the attribute you are patching. It | 
 | also optionally takes a value that you want the attribute (or class or | 
 | whatever) to be replaced with. 'patch.object' takes an object and the name of | 
 | the attribute you would like patched, plus optionally the value to patch it | 
 | with. | 
 |  | 
 | `patch.object`: | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> original = SomeClass.attribute | 
 |     >>> @patch.object(SomeClass, 'attribute', sentinel.attribute) | 
 |     ... def test(): | 
 |     ...     assert SomeClass.attribute == sentinel.attribute | 
 |     ... | 
 |     >>> test() | 
 |     >>> assert SomeClass.attribute == original | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> @patch('package.module.attribute', sentinel.attribute) | 
 |     ... def test(): | 
 |     ...     from package.module import attribute | 
 |     ...     assert attribute is sentinel.attribute | 
 |     ... | 
 |     >>> test() | 
 |  | 
 | If you are patching a module (including `__builtin__`) then use `patch` | 
 | instead of `patch.object`: | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> mock = MagicMock(return_value = sentinel.file_handle) | 
 |     >>> with patch('__builtin__.open', mock): | 
 |     ...     handle = open('filename', 'r') | 
 |     ... | 
 |     >>> mock.assert_called_with('filename', 'r') | 
 |     >>> assert handle == sentinel.file_handle, "incorrect file handle returned" | 
 |  | 
 | The module name can be 'dotted', in the form `package.module` if needed: | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> @patch('package.module.ClassName.attribute', sentinel.attribute) | 
 |     ... def test(): | 
 |     ...     from package.module import ClassName | 
 |     ...     assert ClassName.attribute == sentinel.attribute | 
 |     ... | 
 |     >>> test() | 
 |  | 
 | A nice pattern is to actually decorate test methods themselves: | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> class MyTest(unittest2.TestCase): | 
 |     ...     @patch.object(SomeClass, 'attribute', sentinel.attribute) | 
 |     ...     def test_something(self): | 
 |     ...         self.assertEqual(SomeClass.attribute, sentinel.attribute) | 
 |     ... | 
 |     >>> original = SomeClass.attribute | 
 |     >>> MyTest('test_something').test_something() | 
 |     >>> assert SomeClass.attribute == original | 
 |  | 
 | If you want to patch with a Mock, you can use `patch` with only one argument | 
 | (or `patch.object` with two arguments). The mock will be created for you and | 
 | passed into the test function / method: | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> class MyTest(unittest2.TestCase): | 
 |     ...     @patch.object(SomeClass, 'static_method') | 
 |     ...     def test_something(self, mock_method): | 
 |     ...         SomeClass.static_method() | 
 |     ...         mock_method.assert_called_with() | 
 |     ... | 
 |     >>> MyTest('test_something').test_something() | 
 |  | 
 | You can stack up multiple patch decorators using this pattern: | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> class MyTest(unittest2.TestCase): | 
 |     ...     @patch('package.module.ClassName1') | 
 |     ...     @patch('package.module.ClassName2') | 
 |     ...     def test_something(self, MockClass2, MockClass1): | 
 |     ...         self.assertTrue(package.module.ClassName1 is MockClass1) | 
 |     ...         self.assertTrue(package.module.ClassName2 is MockClass2) | 
 |     ... | 
 |     >>> MyTest('test_something').test_something() | 
 |  | 
 | When you nest patch decorators the mocks are passed in to the decorated | 
 | function in the same order they applied (the normal *python* order that | 
 | decorators are applied). This means from the bottom up, so in the example | 
 | above the mock for `test_module.ClassName2` is passed in first. | 
 |  | 
 | There is also :func:`patch.dict` for setting values in a dictionary just | 
 | during a scope and restoring the dictionary to its original state when the test | 
 | ends: | 
 |  | 
 |    >>> foo = {'key': 'value'} | 
 |    >>> original = foo.copy() | 
 |    >>> with patch.dict(foo, {'newkey': 'newvalue'}, clear=True): | 
 |    ...     assert foo == {'newkey': 'newvalue'} | 
 |    ... | 
 |    >>> assert foo == original | 
 |  | 
 | `patch`, `patch.object` and `patch.dict` can all be used as context managers. | 
 |  | 
 | Where you use `patch` to create a mock for you, you can get a reference to the | 
 | mock using the "as" form of the with statement: | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> class ProductionClass(object): | 
 |     ...     def method(self): | 
 |     ...         pass | 
 |     ... | 
 |     >>> with patch.object(ProductionClass, 'method') as mock_method: | 
 |     ...     mock_method.return_value = None | 
 |     ...     real = ProductionClass() | 
 |     ...     real.method(1, 2, 3) | 
 |     ... | 
 |     >>> mock_method.assert_called_with(1, 2, 3) | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | As an alternative `patch`, `patch.object` and `patch.dict` can be used as | 
 | class decorators. When used in this way it is the same as applying the | 
 | decorator indvidually to every method whose name starts with "test". | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | .. _further-examples: | 
 |  | 
 | Further Examples | 
 | ================ | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | Here are some more examples for some slightly more advanced scenarios. | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | Mocking chained calls | 
 | --------------------- | 
 |  | 
 | Mocking chained calls is actually straightforward with mock once you | 
 | understand the :attr:`~Mock.return_value` attribute. When a mock is called for | 
 | the first time, or you fetch its `return_value` before it has been called, a | 
 | new `Mock` is created. | 
 |  | 
 | This means that you can see how the object returned from a call to a mocked | 
 | object has been used by interrogating the `return_value` mock: | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> mock = Mock() | 
 |     >>> mock().foo(a=2, b=3) | 
 |     <Mock name='mock().foo()' id='...'> | 
 |     >>> mock.return_value.foo.assert_called_with(a=2, b=3) | 
 |  | 
 | From here it is a simple step to configure and then make assertions about | 
 | chained calls. Of course another alternative is writing your code in a more | 
 | testable way in the first place... | 
 |  | 
 | So, suppose we have some code that looks a little bit like this: | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> class Something(object): | 
 |     ...     def __init__(self): | 
 |     ...         self.backend = BackendProvider() | 
 |     ...     def method(self): | 
 |     ...         response = self.backend.get_endpoint('foobar').create_call('spam', 'eggs').start_call() | 
 |     ...         # more code | 
 |  | 
 | Assuming that `BackendProvider` is already well tested, how do we test | 
 | `method()`? Specifically, we want to test that the code section `# more | 
 | code` uses the response object in the correct way. | 
 |  | 
 | As this chain of calls is made from an instance attribute we can monkey patch | 
 | the `backend` attribute on a `Something` instance. In this particular case | 
 | we are only interested in the return value from the final call to | 
 | `start_call` so we don't have much configuration to do. Let's assume the | 
 | object it returns is 'file-like', so we'll ensure that our response object | 
 | uses the builtin `file` as its `spec`. | 
 |  | 
 | To do this we create a mock instance as our mock backend and create a mock | 
 | response object for it. To set the response as the return value for that final | 
 | `start_call` we could do this: | 
 |  | 
 |     `mock_backend.get_endpoint.return_value.create_call.return_value.start_call.return_value = mock_response`. | 
 |  | 
 | We can do that in a slightly nicer way using the :meth:`~Mock.configure_mock` | 
 | method to directly set the return value for us: | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> something = Something() | 
 |     >>> mock_response = Mock(spec=file) | 
 |     >>> mock_backend = Mock() | 
 |     >>> config = {'get_endpoint.return_value.create_call.return_value.start_call.return_value': mock_response} | 
 |     >>> mock_backend.configure_mock(**config) | 
 |  | 
 | With these we monkey patch the "mock backend" in place and can make the real | 
 | call: | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> something.backend = mock_backend | 
 |     >>> something.method() | 
 |  | 
 | Using :attr:`~Mock.mock_calls` we can check the chained call with a single | 
 | assert. A chained call is several calls in one line of code, so there will be | 
 | several entries in `mock_calls`. We can use :meth:`call.call_list` to create | 
 | this list of calls for us: | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> chained = call.get_endpoint('foobar').create_call('spam', 'eggs').start_call() | 
 |     >>> call_list = chained.call_list() | 
 |     >>> assert mock_backend.mock_calls == call_list | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | Partial mocking | 
 | --------------- | 
 |  | 
 | In some tests I wanted to mock out a call to `datetime.date.today() | 
 | <http://docs.python.org/library/datetime.html#datetime.date.today>`_ to return | 
 | a known date, but I didn't want to prevent the code under test from | 
 | creating new date objects. Unfortunately `datetime.date` is written in C, and | 
 | so I couldn't just monkey-patch out the static `date.today` method. | 
 |  | 
 | I found a simple way of doing this that involved effectively wrapping the date | 
 | class with a mock, but passing through calls to the constructor to the real | 
 | class (and returning real instances). | 
 |  | 
 | The :func:`patch decorator <patch>` is used here to | 
 | mock out the `date` class in the module under test. The :attr:`side_effect` | 
 | attribute on the mock date class is then set to a lambda function that returns | 
 | a real date. When the mock date class is called a real date will be | 
 | constructed and returned by `side_effect`. | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> from datetime import date | 
 |     >>> with patch('mymodule.date') as mock_date: | 
 |     ...     mock_date.today.return_value = date(2010, 10, 8) | 
 |     ...     mock_date.side_effect = lambda *args, **kw: date(*args, **kw) | 
 |     ... | 
 |     ...     assert mymodule.date.today() == date(2010, 10, 8) | 
 |     ...     assert mymodule.date(2009, 6, 8) == date(2009, 6, 8) | 
 |     ... | 
 |  | 
 | Note that we don't patch `datetime.date` globally, we patch `date` in the | 
 | module that *uses* it. See :ref:`where to patch <where-to-patch>`. | 
 |  | 
 | When `date.today()` is called a known date is returned, but calls to the | 
 | `date(...)` constructor still return normal dates. Without this you can find | 
 | yourself having to calculate an expected result using exactly the same | 
 | algorithm as the code under test, which is a classic testing anti-pattern. | 
 |  | 
 | Calls to the date constructor are recorded in the `mock_date` attributes | 
 | (`call_count` and friends) which may also be useful for your tests. | 
 |  | 
 | An alternative way of dealing with mocking dates, or other builtin classes, | 
 | is discussed in `this blog entry | 
 | <http://williamjohnbert.com/2011/07/how-to-unit-testing-in-django-with-mocking-and-patching/>`_. | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | Mocking a Generator Method | 
 | -------------------------- | 
 |  | 
 | A Python generator is a function or method that uses the `yield statement | 
 | <http://docs.python.org/reference/simple_stmts.html#the-yield-statement>`_ to | 
 | return a series of values when iterated over [#]_. | 
 |  | 
 | A generator method / function is called to return the generator object. It is | 
 | the generator object that is then iterated over. The protocol method for | 
 | iteration is `__iter__ | 
 | <http://docs.python.org/library/stdtypes.html#container.__iter__>`_, so we can | 
 | mock this using a `MagicMock`. | 
 |  | 
 | Here's an example class with an "iter" method implemented as a generator: | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> class Foo(object): | 
 |     ...     def iter(self): | 
 |     ...         for i in [1, 2, 3]: | 
 |     ...             yield i | 
 |     ... | 
 |     >>> foo = Foo() | 
 |     >>> list(foo.iter()) | 
 |     [1, 2, 3] | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | How would we mock this class, and in particular its "iter" method? | 
 |  | 
 | To configure the values returned from the iteration (implicit in the call to | 
 | `list`), we need to configure the object returned by the call to `foo.iter()`. | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> mock_foo = MagicMock() | 
 |     >>> mock_foo.iter.return_value = iter([1, 2, 3]) | 
 |     >>> list(mock_foo.iter()) | 
 |     [1, 2, 3] | 
 |  | 
 | .. [#] There are also generator expressions and more `advanced uses | 
 |     <http://www.dabeaz.com/coroutines/index.html>`_ of generators, but we aren't | 
 |     concerned about them here. A very good introduction to generators and how | 
 |     powerful they are is: `Generator Tricks for Systems Programmers | 
 |     <http://www.dabeaz.com/generators/>`_. | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | Applying the same patch to every test method | 
 | -------------------------------------------- | 
 |  | 
 | If you want several patches in place for multiple test methods the obvious way | 
 | is to apply the patch decorators to every method. This can feel like unnecessary | 
 | repetition. For Python 2.6 or more recent you can use `patch` (in all its | 
 | various forms) as a class decorator. This applies the patches to all test | 
 | methods on the class. A test method is identified by methods whose names start | 
 | with `test`: | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> @patch('mymodule.SomeClass') | 
 |     ... class MyTest(TestCase): | 
 |     ... | 
 |     ...     def test_one(self, MockSomeClass): | 
 |     ...         self.assertTrue(mymodule.SomeClass is MockSomeClass) | 
 |     ... | 
 |     ...     def test_two(self, MockSomeClass): | 
 |     ...         self.assertTrue(mymodule.SomeClass is MockSomeClass) | 
 |     ... | 
 |     ...     def not_a_test(self): | 
 |     ...         return 'something' | 
 |     ... | 
 |     >>> MyTest('test_one').test_one() | 
 |     >>> MyTest('test_two').test_two() | 
 |     >>> MyTest('test_two').not_a_test() | 
 |     'something' | 
 |  | 
 | An alternative way of managing patches is to use the :ref:`start-and-stop`. | 
 | These allow you to move the patching into your `setUp` and `tearDown` methods. | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> class MyTest(TestCase): | 
 |     ...     def setUp(self): | 
 |     ...         self.patcher = patch('mymodule.foo') | 
 |     ...         self.mock_foo = self.patcher.start() | 
 |     ... | 
 |     ...     def test_foo(self): | 
 |     ...         self.assertTrue(mymodule.foo is self.mock_foo) | 
 |     ... | 
 |     ...     def tearDown(self): | 
 |     ...         self.patcher.stop() | 
 |     ... | 
 |     >>> MyTest('test_foo').run() | 
 |  | 
 | If you use this technique you must ensure that the patching is "undone" by | 
 | calling `stop`. This can be fiddlier than you might think, because if an | 
 | exception is raised in the setUp then tearDown is not called. | 
 | :meth:`unittest.TestCase.addCleanup` makes this easier: | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> class MyTest(TestCase): | 
 |     ...     def setUp(self): | 
 |     ...         patcher = patch('mymodule.foo') | 
 |     ...         self.addCleanup(patcher.stop) | 
 |     ...         self.mock_foo = patcher.start() | 
 |     ... | 
 |     ...     def test_foo(self): | 
 |     ...         self.assertTrue(mymodule.foo is self.mock_foo) | 
 |     ... | 
 |     >>> MyTest('test_foo').run() | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | Mocking Unbound Methods | 
 | ----------------------- | 
 |  | 
 | Whilst writing tests today I needed to patch an *unbound method* (patching the | 
 | method on the class rather than on the instance). I needed self to be passed | 
 | in as the first argument because I want to make asserts about which objects | 
 | were calling this particular method. The issue is that you can't patch with a | 
 | mock for this, because if you replace an unbound method with a mock it doesn't | 
 | become a bound method when fetched from the instance, and so it doesn't get | 
 | self passed in. The workaround is to patch the unbound method with a real | 
 | function instead. The :func:`patch` decorator makes it so simple to | 
 | patch out methods with a mock that having to create a real function becomes a | 
 | nuisance. | 
 |  | 
 | If you pass `autospec=True` to patch then it does the patching with a | 
 | *real* function object. This function object has the same signature as the one | 
 | it is replacing, but delegates to a mock under the hood. You still get your | 
 | mock auto-created in exactly the same way as before. What it means though, is | 
 | that if you use it to patch out an unbound method on a class the mocked | 
 | function will be turned into a bound method if it is fetched from an instance. | 
 | It will have `self` passed in as the first argument, which is exactly what I | 
 | wanted: | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> class Foo(object): | 
 |     ...   def foo(self): | 
 |     ...     pass | 
 |     ... | 
 |     >>> with patch.object(Foo, 'foo', autospec=True) as mock_foo: | 
 |     ...   mock_foo.return_value = 'foo' | 
 |     ...   foo = Foo() | 
 |     ...   foo.foo() | 
 |     ... | 
 |     'foo' | 
 |     >>> mock_foo.assert_called_once_with(foo) | 
 |  | 
 | If we don't use `autospec=True` then the unbound method is patched out | 
 | with a Mock instance instead, and isn't called with `self`. | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | Checking multiple calls with mock | 
 | --------------------------------- | 
 |  | 
 | mock has a nice API for making assertions about how your mock objects are used. | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> mock = Mock() | 
 |     >>> mock.foo_bar.return_value = None | 
 |     >>> mock.foo_bar('baz', spam='eggs') | 
 |     >>> mock.foo_bar.assert_called_with('baz', spam='eggs') | 
 |  | 
 | If your mock is only being called once you can use the | 
 | :meth:`assert_called_once_with` method that also asserts that the | 
 | :attr:`call_count` is one. | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> mock.foo_bar.assert_called_once_with('baz', spam='eggs') | 
 |     >>> mock.foo_bar() | 
 |     >>> mock.foo_bar.assert_called_once_with('baz', spam='eggs') | 
 |     Traceback (most recent call last): | 
 |         ... | 
 |     AssertionError: Expected to be called once. Called 2 times. | 
 |  | 
 | Both `assert_called_with` and `assert_called_once_with` make assertions about | 
 | the *most recent* call. If your mock is going to be called several times, and | 
 | you want to make assertions about *all* those calls you can use | 
 | :attr:`~Mock.call_args_list`: | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> mock = Mock(return_value=None) | 
 |     >>> mock(1, 2, 3) | 
 |     >>> mock(4, 5, 6) | 
 |     >>> mock() | 
 |     >>> mock.call_args_list | 
 |     [call(1, 2, 3), call(4, 5, 6), call()] | 
 |  | 
 | The :data:`call` helper makes it easy to make assertions about these calls. You | 
 | can build up a list of expected calls and compare it to `call_args_list`. This | 
 | looks remarkably similar to the repr of the `call_args_list`: | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> expected = [call(1, 2, 3), call(4, 5, 6), call()] | 
 |     >>> mock.call_args_list == expected | 
 |     True | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | Coping with mutable arguments | 
 | ----------------------------- | 
 |  | 
 | Another situation is rare, but can bite you, is when your mock is called with | 
 | mutable arguments. `call_args` and `call_args_list` store *references* to the | 
 | arguments. If the arguments are mutated by the code under test then you can no | 
 | longer make assertions about what the values were when the mock was called. | 
 |  | 
 | Here's some example code that shows the problem. Imagine the following functions | 
 | defined in 'mymodule':: | 
 |  | 
 |     def frob(val): | 
 |         pass | 
 |  | 
 |     def grob(val): | 
 |         "First frob and then clear val" | 
 |         frob(val) | 
 |         val.clear() | 
 |  | 
 | When we try to test that `grob` calls `frob` with the correct argument look | 
 | what happens: | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> with patch('mymodule.frob') as mock_frob: | 
 |     ...     val = set([6]) | 
 |     ...     mymodule.grob(val) | 
 |     ... | 
 |     >>> val | 
 |     set([]) | 
 |     >>> mock_frob.assert_called_with(set([6])) | 
 |     Traceback (most recent call last): | 
 |         ... | 
 |     AssertionError: Expected: ((set([6]),), {}) | 
 |     Called with: ((set([]),), {}) | 
 |  | 
 | One possibility would be for mock to copy the arguments you pass in. This | 
 | could then cause problems if you do assertions that rely on object identity | 
 | for equality. | 
 |  | 
 | Here's one solution that uses the :attr:`side_effect` | 
 | functionality. If you provide a `side_effect` function for a mock then | 
 | `side_effect` will be called with the same args as the mock. This gives us an | 
 | opportunity to copy the arguments and store them for later assertions. In this | 
 | example I'm using *another* mock to store the arguments so that I can use the | 
 | mock methods for doing the assertion. Again a helper function sets this up for | 
 | me. | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> from copy import deepcopy | 
 |     >>> from unittest.mock import Mock, patch, DEFAULT | 
 |     >>> def copy_call_args(mock): | 
 |     ...     new_mock = Mock() | 
 |     ...     def side_effect(*args, **kwargs): | 
 |     ...         args = deepcopy(args) | 
 |     ...         kwargs = deepcopy(kwargs) | 
 |     ...         new_mock(*args, **kwargs) | 
 |     ...         return DEFAULT | 
 |     ...     mock.side_effect = side_effect | 
 |     ...     return new_mock | 
 |     ... | 
 |     >>> with patch('mymodule.frob') as mock_frob: | 
 |     ...     new_mock = copy_call_args(mock_frob) | 
 |     ...     val = set([6]) | 
 |     ...     mymodule.grob(val) | 
 |     ... | 
 |     >>> new_mock.assert_called_with(set([6])) | 
 |     >>> new_mock.call_args | 
 |     call(set([6])) | 
 |  | 
 | `copy_call_args` is called with the mock that will be called. It returns a new | 
 | mock that we do the assertion on. The `side_effect` function makes a copy of | 
 | the args and calls our `new_mock` with the copy. | 
 |  | 
 | .. note:: | 
 |  | 
 |     If your mock is only going to be used once there is an easier way of | 
 |     checking arguments at the point they are called. You can simply do the | 
 |     checking inside a `side_effect` function. | 
 |  | 
 |         >>> def side_effect(arg): | 
 |         ...     assert arg == set([6]) | 
 |         ... | 
 |         >>> mock = Mock(side_effect=side_effect) | 
 |         >>> mock(set([6])) | 
 |         >>> mock(set()) | 
 |         Traceback (most recent call last): | 
 |             ... | 
 |         AssertionError | 
 |  | 
 | An alternative approach is to create a subclass of `Mock` or `MagicMock` that | 
 | copies (using :func:`copy.deepcopy`) the arguments. | 
 | Here's an example implementation: | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> from copy import deepcopy | 
 |     >>> class CopyingMock(MagicMock): | 
 |     ...     def __call__(self, *args, **kwargs): | 
 |     ...         args = deepcopy(args) | 
 |     ...         kwargs = deepcopy(kwargs) | 
 |     ...         return super(CopyingMock, self).__call__(*args, **kwargs) | 
 |     ... | 
 |     >>> c = CopyingMock(return_value=None) | 
 |     >>> arg = set() | 
 |     >>> c(arg) | 
 |     >>> arg.add(1) | 
 |     >>> c.assert_called_with(set()) | 
 |     >>> c.assert_called_with(arg) | 
 |     Traceback (most recent call last): | 
 |         ... | 
 |     AssertionError: Expected call: mock(set([1])) | 
 |     Actual call: mock(set([])) | 
 |     >>> c.foo | 
 |     <CopyingMock name='mock.foo' id='...'> | 
 |  | 
 | When you subclass `Mock` or `MagicMock` all dynamically created attributes, | 
 | and the `return_value` will use your subclass automatically. That means all | 
 | children of a `CopyingMock` will also have the type `CopyingMock`. | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | Multiple calls with different effects | 
 | ------------------------------------- | 
 |  | 
 | Handling code that needs to behave differently on subsequent calls during the | 
 | test can be tricky. For example you may have a function that needs to raise | 
 | an exception the first time it is called but returns a response on the second | 
 | call (testing retry behaviour). | 
 |  | 
 | One approach is to use a :attr:`side_effect` function that replaces itself. The | 
 | first time it is called the `side_effect` sets a new `side_effect` that will | 
 | be used for the second call. It then raises an exception: | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> def side_effect(*args): | 
 |     ...   def second_call(*args): | 
 |     ...     return 'response' | 
 |     ...   mock.side_effect = second_call | 
 |     ...   raise Exception('boom') | 
 |     ... | 
 |     >>> mock = Mock(side_effect=side_effect) | 
 |     >>> mock('first') | 
 |     Traceback (most recent call last): | 
 |         ... | 
 |     Exception: boom | 
 |     >>> mock('second') | 
 |     'response' | 
 |     >>> mock.assert_called_with('second') | 
 |  | 
 | Another perfectly valid way would be to pop return values from a list. If the | 
 | return value is an exception, raise it instead of returning it: | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> returns = [Exception('boom'), 'response'] | 
 |     >>> def side_effect(*args): | 
 |     ...   result = returns.pop(0) | 
 |     ...   if isinstance(result, Exception): | 
 |     ...     raise result | 
 |     ...   return result | 
 |     ... | 
 |     >>> mock = Mock(side_effect=side_effect) | 
 |     >>> mock('first') | 
 |     Traceback (most recent call last): | 
 |         ... | 
 |     Exception: boom | 
 |     >>> mock('second') | 
 |     'response' | 
 |     >>> mock.assert_called_with('second') | 
 |  | 
 | Which approach you prefer is a matter of taste. The first approach is actually | 
 | a line shorter but maybe the second approach is more readable. | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | Nesting Patches | 
 | --------------- | 
 |  | 
 | Using patch as a context manager is nice, but if you do multiple patches you | 
 | can end up with nested with statements indenting further and further to the | 
 | right: | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> class MyTest(TestCase): | 
 |     ... | 
 |     ...     def test_foo(self): | 
 |     ...         with patch('mymodule.Foo') as mock_foo: | 
 |     ...             with patch('mymodule.Bar') as mock_bar: | 
 |     ...                 with patch('mymodule.Spam') as mock_spam: | 
 |     ...                     assert mymodule.Foo is mock_foo | 
 |     ...                     assert mymodule.Bar is mock_bar | 
 |     ...                     assert mymodule.Spam is mock_spam | 
 |     ... | 
 |     >>> original = mymodule.Foo | 
 |     >>> MyTest('test_foo').test_foo() | 
 |     >>> assert mymodule.Foo is original | 
 |  | 
 | With unittest `cleanup` functions and the :ref:`start-and-stop` we can | 
 | achieve the same effect without the nested indentation. A simple helper | 
 | method, `create_patch`, puts the patch in place and returns the created mock | 
 | for us: | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> class MyTest(TestCase): | 
 |     ... | 
 |     ...     def create_patch(self, name): | 
 |     ...         patcher = patch(name) | 
 |     ...         thing = patcher.start() | 
 |     ...         self.addCleanup(patcher.stop) | 
 |     ...         return thing | 
 |     ... | 
 |     ...     def test_foo(self): | 
 |     ...         mock_foo = self.create_patch('mymodule.Foo') | 
 |     ...         mock_bar = self.create_patch('mymodule.Bar') | 
 |     ...         mock_spam = self.create_patch('mymodule.Spam') | 
 |     ... | 
 |     ...         assert mymodule.Foo is mock_foo | 
 |     ...         assert mymodule.Bar is mock_bar | 
 |     ...         assert mymodule.Spam is mock_spam | 
 |     ... | 
 |     >>> original = mymodule.Foo | 
 |     >>> MyTest('test_foo').run() | 
 |     >>> assert mymodule.Foo is original | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | Mocking a dictionary with MagicMock | 
 | ----------------------------------- | 
 |  | 
 | You may want to mock a dictionary, or other container object, recording all | 
 | access to it whilst having it still behave like a dictionary. | 
 |  | 
 | We can do this with :class:`MagicMock`, which will behave like a dictionary, | 
 | and using :data:`~Mock.side_effect` to delegate dictionary access to a real | 
 | underlying dictionary that is under our control. | 
 |  | 
 | When the `__getitem__` and `__setitem__` methods of our `MagicMock` are called | 
 | (normal dictionary access) then `side_effect` is called with the key (and in | 
 | the case of `__setitem__` the value too). We can also control what is returned. | 
 |  | 
 | After the `MagicMock` has been used we can use attributes like | 
 | :data:`~Mock.call_args_list` to assert about how the dictionary was used: | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> my_dict = {'a': 1, 'b': 2, 'c': 3} | 
 |     >>> def getitem(name): | 
 |     ...      return my_dict[name] | 
 |     ... | 
 |     >>> def setitem(name, val): | 
 |     ...     my_dict[name] = val | 
 |     ... | 
 |     >>> mock = MagicMock() | 
 |     >>> mock.__getitem__.side_effect = getitem | 
 |     >>> mock.__setitem__.side_effect = setitem | 
 |  | 
 | .. note:: | 
 |  | 
 |     An alternative to using `MagicMock` is to use `Mock` and *only* provide | 
 |     the magic methods you specifically want: | 
 |  | 
 |         >>> mock = Mock() | 
 |         >>> mock.__setitem__ = Mock(side_effect=getitem) | 
 |         >>> mock.__getitem__ = Mock(side_effect=setitem) | 
 |  | 
 |     A *third* option is to use `MagicMock` but passing in `dict` as the `spec` | 
 |     (or `spec_set`) argument so that the `MagicMock` created only has | 
 |     dictionary magic methods available: | 
 |  | 
 |         >>> mock = MagicMock(spec_set=dict) | 
 |         >>> mock.__getitem__.side_effect = getitem | 
 |         >>> mock.__setitem__.side_effect = setitem | 
 |  | 
 | With these side effect functions in place, the `mock` will behave like a normal | 
 | dictionary but recording the access. It even raises a `KeyError` if you try | 
 | to access a key that doesn't exist. | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> mock['a'] | 
 |     1 | 
 |     >>> mock['c'] | 
 |     3 | 
 |     >>> mock['d'] | 
 |     Traceback (most recent call last): | 
 |         ... | 
 |     KeyError: 'd' | 
 |     >>> mock['b'] = 'fish' | 
 |     >>> mock['d'] = 'eggs' | 
 |     >>> mock['b'] | 
 |     'fish' | 
 |     >>> mock['d'] | 
 |     'eggs' | 
 |  | 
 | After it has been used you can make assertions about the access using the normal | 
 | mock methods and attributes: | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> mock.__getitem__.call_args_list | 
 |     [call('a'), call('c'), call('d'), call('b'), call('d')] | 
 |     >>> mock.__setitem__.call_args_list | 
 |     [call('b', 'fish'), call('d', 'eggs')] | 
 |     >>> my_dict | 
 |     {'a': 1, 'c': 3, 'b': 'fish', 'd': 'eggs'} | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | Mock subclasses and their attributes | 
 | ------------------------------------ | 
 |  | 
 | There are various reasons why you might want to subclass `Mock`. One reason | 
 | might be to add helper methods. Here's a silly example: | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> class MyMock(MagicMock): | 
 |     ...     def has_been_called(self): | 
 |     ...         return self.called | 
 |     ... | 
 |     >>> mymock = MyMock(return_value=None) | 
 |     >>> mymock | 
 |     <MyMock id='...'> | 
 |     >>> mymock.has_been_called() | 
 |     False | 
 |     >>> mymock() | 
 |     >>> mymock.has_been_called() | 
 |     True | 
 |  | 
 | The standard behaviour for `Mock` instances is that attributes and the return | 
 | value mocks are of the same type as the mock they are accessed on. This ensures | 
 | that `Mock` attributes are `Mocks` and `MagicMock` attributes are `MagicMocks` | 
 | [#]_. So if you're subclassing to add helper methods then they'll also be | 
 | available on the attributes and return value mock of instances of your | 
 | subclass. | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> mymock.foo | 
 |     <MyMock name='mock.foo' id='...'> | 
 |     >>> mymock.foo.has_been_called() | 
 |     False | 
 |     >>> mymock.foo() | 
 |     <MyMock name='mock.foo()' id='...'> | 
 |     >>> mymock.foo.has_been_called() | 
 |     True | 
 |  | 
 | Sometimes this is inconvenient. For example, `one user | 
 | <https://code.google.com/p/mock/issues/detail?id=105>`_ is subclassing mock to | 
 | created a `Twisted adaptor | 
 | <http://twistedmatrix.com/documents/11.0.0/api/twisted.python.components.html>`_. | 
 | Having this applied to attributes too actually causes errors. | 
 |  | 
 | `Mock` (in all its flavours) uses a method called `_get_child_mock` to create | 
 | these "sub-mocks" for attributes and return values. You can prevent your | 
 | subclass being used for attributes by overriding this method. The signature is | 
 | that it takes arbitrary keyword arguments (`**kwargs`) which are then passed | 
 | onto the mock constructor: | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> class Subclass(MagicMock): | 
 |     ...     def _get_child_mock(self, **kwargs): | 
 |     ...         return MagicMock(**kwargs) | 
 |     ... | 
 |     >>> mymock = Subclass() | 
 |     >>> mymock.foo | 
 |     <MagicMock name='mock.foo' id='...'> | 
 |     >>> assert isinstance(mymock, Subclass) | 
 |     >>> assert not isinstance(mymock.foo, Subclass) | 
 |     >>> assert not isinstance(mymock(), Subclass) | 
 |  | 
 | .. [#] An exception to this rule are the non-callable mocks. Attributes use the | 
 |     callable variant because otherwise non-callable mocks couldn't have callable | 
 |     methods. | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | Mocking imports with patch.dict | 
 | ------------------------------- | 
 |  | 
 | One situation where mocking can be hard is where you have a local import inside | 
 | a function. These are harder to mock because they aren't using an object from | 
 | the module namespace that we can patch out. | 
 |  | 
 | Generally local imports are to be avoided. They are sometimes done to prevent | 
 | circular dependencies, for which there is *usually* a much better way to solve | 
 | the problem (refactor the code) or to prevent "up front costs" by delaying the | 
 | import. This can also be solved in better ways than an unconditional local | 
 | import (store the module as a class or module attribute and only do the import | 
 | on first use). | 
 |  | 
 | That aside there is a way to use `mock` to affect the results of an import. | 
 | Importing fetches an *object* from the `sys.modules` dictionary. Note that it | 
 | fetches an *object*, which need not be a module. Importing a module for the | 
 | first time results in a module object being put in `sys.modules`, so usually | 
 | when you import something you get a module back. This need not be the case | 
 | however. | 
 |  | 
 | This means you can use :func:`patch.dict` to *temporarily* put a mock in place | 
 | in `sys.modules`. Any imports whilst this patch is active will fetch the mock. | 
 | When the patch is complete (the decorated function exits, the with statement | 
 | body is complete or `patcher.stop()` is called) then whatever was there | 
 | previously will be restored safely. | 
 |  | 
 | Here's an example that mocks out the 'fooble' module. | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> mock = Mock() | 
 |     >>> with patch.dict('sys.modules', {'fooble': mock}): | 
 |     ...    import fooble | 
 |     ...    fooble.blob() | 
 |     ... | 
 |     <Mock name='mock.blob()' id='...'> | 
 |     >>> assert 'fooble' not in sys.modules | 
 |     >>> mock.blob.assert_called_once_with() | 
 |  | 
 | As you can see the `import fooble` succeeds, but on exit there is no 'fooble' | 
 | left in `sys.modules`. | 
 |  | 
 | This also works for the `from module import name` form: | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> mock = Mock() | 
 |     >>> with patch.dict('sys.modules', {'fooble': mock}): | 
 |     ...    from fooble import blob | 
 |     ...    blob.blip() | 
 |     ... | 
 |     <Mock name='mock.blob.blip()' id='...'> | 
 |     >>> mock.blob.blip.assert_called_once_with() | 
 |  | 
 | With slightly more work you can also mock package imports: | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> mock = Mock() | 
 |     >>> modules = {'package': mock, 'package.module': mock.module} | 
 |     >>> with patch.dict('sys.modules', modules): | 
 |     ...    from package.module import fooble | 
 |     ...    fooble() | 
 |     ... | 
 |     <Mock name='mock.module.fooble()' id='...'> | 
 |     >>> mock.module.fooble.assert_called_once_with() | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | Tracking order of calls and less verbose call assertions | 
 | -------------------------------------------------------- | 
 |  | 
 | The :class:`Mock` class allows you to track the *order* of method calls on | 
 | your mock objects through the :attr:`~Mock.method_calls` attribute. This | 
 | doesn't allow you to track the order of calls between separate mock objects, | 
 | however we can use :attr:`~Mock.mock_calls` to achieve the same effect. | 
 |  | 
 | Because mocks track calls to child mocks in `mock_calls`, and accessing an | 
 | arbitrary attribute of a mock creates a child mock, we can create our separate | 
 | mocks from a parent one. Calls to those child mock will then all be recorded, | 
 | in order, in the `mock_calls` of the parent: | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> manager = Mock() | 
 |     >>> mock_foo = manager.foo | 
 |     >>> mock_bar = manager.bar | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> mock_foo.something() | 
 |     <Mock name='mock.foo.something()' id='...'> | 
 |     >>> mock_bar.other.thing() | 
 |     <Mock name='mock.bar.other.thing()' id='...'> | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> manager.mock_calls | 
 |     [call.foo.something(), call.bar.other.thing()] | 
 |  | 
 | We can then assert about the calls, including the order, by comparing with | 
 | the `mock_calls` attribute on the manager mock: | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> expected_calls = [call.foo.something(), call.bar.other.thing()] | 
 |     >>> manager.mock_calls == expected_calls | 
 |     True | 
 |  | 
 | If `patch` is creating, and putting in place, your mocks then you can attach | 
 | them to a manager mock using the :meth:`~Mock.attach_mock` method. After | 
 | attaching calls will be recorded in `mock_calls` of the manager. | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> manager = MagicMock() | 
 |     >>> with patch('mymodule.Class1') as MockClass1: | 
 |     ...     with patch('mymodule.Class2') as MockClass2: | 
 |     ...         manager.attach_mock(MockClass1, 'MockClass1') | 
 |     ...         manager.attach_mock(MockClass2, 'MockClass2') | 
 |     ...         MockClass1().foo() | 
 |     ...         MockClass2().bar() | 
 |     ... | 
 |     <MagicMock name='mock.MockClass1().foo()' id='...'> | 
 |     <MagicMock name='mock.MockClass2().bar()' id='...'> | 
 |     >>> manager.mock_calls | 
 |     [call.MockClass1(), | 
 |      call.MockClass1().foo(), | 
 |      call.MockClass2(), | 
 |      call.MockClass2().bar()] | 
 |  | 
 | If many calls have been made, but you're only interested in a particular | 
 | sequence of them then an alternative is to use the | 
 | :meth:`~Mock.assert_has_calls` method. This takes a list of calls (constructed | 
 | with the :data:`call` object). If that sequence of calls are in | 
 | :attr:`~Mock.mock_calls` then the assert succeeds. | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> m = MagicMock() | 
 |     >>> m().foo().bar().baz() | 
 |     <MagicMock name='mock().foo().bar().baz()' id='...'> | 
 |     >>> m.one().two().three() | 
 |     <MagicMock name='mock.one().two().three()' id='...'> | 
 |     >>> calls = call.one().two().three().call_list() | 
 |     >>> m.assert_has_calls(calls) | 
 |  | 
 | Even though the chained call `m.one().two().three()` aren't the only calls that | 
 | have been made to the mock, the assert still succeeds. | 
 |  | 
 | Sometimes a mock may have several calls made to it, and you are only interested | 
 | in asserting about *some* of those calls. You may not even care about the | 
 | order. In this case you can pass `any_order=True` to `assert_has_calls`: | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> m = MagicMock() | 
 |     >>> m(1), m.two(2, 3), m.seven(7), m.fifty('50') | 
 |     (...) | 
 |     >>> calls = [call.fifty('50'), call(1), call.seven(7)] | 
 |     >>> m.assert_has_calls(calls, any_order=True) | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | More complex argument matching | 
 | ------------------------------ | 
 |  | 
 | Using the same basic concept as :data:`ANY` we can implement matchers to do more | 
 | complex assertions on objects used as arguments to mocks. | 
 |  | 
 | Suppose we expect some object to be passed to a mock that by default | 
 | compares equal based on object identity (which is the Python default for user | 
 | defined classes). To use :meth:`~Mock.assert_called_with` we would need to pass | 
 | in the exact same object. If we are only interested in some of the attributes | 
 | of this object then we can create a matcher that will check these attributes | 
 | for us. | 
 |  | 
 | You can see in this example how a 'standard' call to `assert_called_with` isn't | 
 | sufficient: | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> class Foo(object): | 
 |     ...     def __init__(self, a, b): | 
 |     ...         self.a, self.b = a, b | 
 |     ... | 
 |     >>> mock = Mock(return_value=None) | 
 |     >>> mock(Foo(1, 2)) | 
 |     >>> mock.assert_called_with(Foo(1, 2)) | 
 |     Traceback (most recent call last): | 
 |         ... | 
 |     AssertionError: Expected: call(<__main__.Foo object at 0x...>) | 
 |     Actual call: call(<__main__.Foo object at 0x...>) | 
 |  | 
 | A comparison function for our `Foo` class might look something like this: | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> def compare(self, other): | 
 |     ...     if not type(self) == type(other): | 
 |     ...         return False | 
 |     ...     if self.a != other.a: | 
 |     ...         return False | 
 |     ...     if self.b != other.b: | 
 |     ...         return False | 
 |     ...     return True | 
 |     ... | 
 |  | 
 | And a matcher object that can use comparison functions like this for its | 
 | equality operation would look something like this: | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> class Matcher(object): | 
 |     ...     def __init__(self, compare, some_obj): | 
 |     ...         self.compare = compare | 
 |     ...         self.some_obj = some_obj | 
 |     ...     def __eq__(self, other): | 
 |     ...         return self.compare(self.some_obj, other) | 
 |     ... | 
 |  | 
 | Putting all this together: | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> match_foo = Matcher(compare, Foo(1, 2)) | 
 |     >>> mock.assert_called_with(match_foo) | 
 |  | 
 | The `Matcher` is instantiated with our compare function and the `Foo` object | 
 | we want to compare against. In `assert_called_with` the `Matcher` equality | 
 | method will be called, which compares the object the mock was called with | 
 | against the one we created our matcher with. If they match then | 
 | `assert_called_with` passes, and if they don't an `AssertionError` is raised: | 
 |  | 
 |     >>> match_wrong = Matcher(compare, Foo(3, 4)) | 
 |     >>> mock.assert_called_with(match_wrong) | 
 |     Traceback (most recent call last): | 
 |         ... | 
 |     AssertionError: Expected: ((<Matcher object at 0x...>,), {}) | 
 |     Called with: ((<Foo object at 0x...>,), {}) | 
 |  | 
 | With a bit of tweaking you could have the comparison function raise the | 
 | `AssertionError` directly and provide a more useful failure message. | 
 |  | 
 | As of version 1.5, the Python testing library `PyHamcrest | 
 | <http://pypi.python.org/pypi/PyHamcrest>`_ provides similar functionality, | 
 | that may be useful here, in the form of its equality matcher | 
 | (`hamcrest.library.integration.match_equality | 
 | <http://packages.python.org/PyHamcrest/integration.html#hamcrest.library.integration.match_equality>`_). |