blob: 4af7168a18fce09a1a92a1e066e8684694e700c5 [file] [log] [blame]
Georg Brandl116aa622007-08-15 14:28:22 +00001.. highlightlang:: c
2
3
4.. _extending-intro:
5
6******************************
7Extending Python with C or C++
8******************************
9
10It is quite easy to add new built-in modules to Python, if you know how to
11program in C. Such :dfn:`extension modules` can do two things that can't be
12done directly in Python: they can implement new built-in object types, and they
13can call C library functions and system calls.
14
15To support extensions, the Python API (Application Programmers Interface)
16defines a set of functions, macros and variables that provide access to most
17aspects of the Python run-time system. The Python API is incorporated in a C
18source file by including the header ``"Python.h"``.
19
20The compilation of an extension module depends on its intended use as well as on
21your system setup; details are given in later chapters.
22
23
24.. _extending-simpleexample:
25
26A Simple Example
27================
28
29Let's create an extension module called ``spam`` (the favorite food of Monty
30Python fans...) and let's say we want to create a Python interface to the C
31library function :cfunc:`system`. [#]_ This function takes a null-terminated
32character string as argument and returns an integer. We want this function to
33be callable from Python as follows::
34
35 >>> import spam
36 >>> status = spam.system("ls -l")
37
38Begin by creating a file :file:`spammodule.c`. (Historically, if a module is
39called ``spam``, the C file containing its implementation is called
40:file:`spammodule.c`; if the module name is very long, like ``spammify``, the
41module name can be just :file:`spammify.c`.)
42
43The first line of our file can be::
44
45 #include <Python.h>
46
47which pulls in the Python API (you can add a comment describing the purpose of
48the module and a copyright notice if you like).
49
50.. warning::
51
52 Since Python may define some pre-processor definitions which affect the standard
53 headers on some systems, you *must* include :file:`Python.h` before any standard
54 headers are included.
55
56All user-visible symbols defined by :file:`Python.h` have a prefix of ``Py`` or
57``PY``, except those defined in standard header files. For convenience, and
58since they are used extensively by the Python interpreter, ``"Python.h"``
59includes a few standard header files: ``<stdio.h>``, ``<string.h>``,
60``<errno.h>``, and ``<stdlib.h>``. If the latter header file does not exist on
61your system, it declares the functions :cfunc:`malloc`, :cfunc:`free` and
62:cfunc:`realloc` directly.
63
64The next thing we add to our module file is the C function that will be called
65when the Python expression ``spam.system(string)`` is evaluated (we'll see
66shortly how it ends up being called)::
67
68 static PyObject *
69 spam_system(PyObject *self, PyObject *args)
70 {
71 const char *command;
72 int sts;
73
74 if (!PyArg_ParseTuple(args, "s", &command))
75 return NULL;
76 sts = system(command);
77 return Py_BuildValue("i", sts);
78 }
79
80There is a straightforward translation from the argument list in Python (for
81example, the single expression ``"ls -l"``) to the arguments passed to the C
82function. The C function always has two arguments, conventionally named *self*
83and *args*.
84
85The *self* argument is only used when the C function implements a built-in
86method, not a function. In the example, *self* will always be a *NULL* pointer,
87since we are defining a function, not a method. (This is done so that the
88interpreter doesn't have to understand two different types of C functions.)
89
90The *args* argument will be a pointer to a Python tuple object containing the
91arguments. Each item of the tuple corresponds to an argument in the call's
92argument list. The arguments are Python objects --- in order to do anything
93with them in our C function we have to convert them to C values. The function
94:cfunc:`PyArg_ParseTuple` in the Python API checks the argument types and
95converts them to C values. It uses a template string to determine the required
96types of the arguments as well as the types of the C variables into which to
97store the converted values. More about this later.
98
99:cfunc:`PyArg_ParseTuple` returns true (nonzero) if all arguments have the right
100type and its components have been stored in the variables whose addresses are
101passed. It returns false (zero) if an invalid argument list was passed. In the
102latter case it also raises an appropriate exception so the calling function can
103return *NULL* immediately (as we saw in the example).
104
105
106.. _extending-errors:
107
108Intermezzo: Errors and Exceptions
109=================================
110
111An important convention throughout the Python interpreter is the following: when
112a function fails, it should set an exception condition and return an error value
113(usually a *NULL* pointer). Exceptions are stored in a static global variable
114inside the interpreter; if this variable is *NULL* no exception has occurred. A
115second global variable stores the "associated value" of the exception (the
116second argument to :keyword:`raise`). A third variable contains the stack
117traceback in case the error originated in Python code. These three variables
118are the C equivalents of the result in Python of :meth:`sys.exc_info` (see the
119section on module :mod:`sys` in the Python Library Reference). It is important
120to know about them to understand how errors are passed around.
121
122The Python API defines a number of functions to set various types of exceptions.
123
124The most common one is :cfunc:`PyErr_SetString`. Its arguments are an exception
125object and a C string. The exception object is usually a predefined object like
126:cdata:`PyExc_ZeroDivisionError`. The C string indicates the cause of the error
127and is converted to a Python string object and stored as the "associated value"
128of the exception.
129
130Another useful function is :cfunc:`PyErr_SetFromErrno`, which only takes an
131exception argument and constructs the associated value by inspection of the
132global variable :cdata:`errno`. The most general function is
133:cfunc:`PyErr_SetObject`, which takes two object arguments, the exception and
134its associated value. You don't need to :cfunc:`Py_INCREF` the objects passed
135to any of these functions.
136
137You can test non-destructively whether an exception has been set with
138:cfunc:`PyErr_Occurred`. This returns the current exception object, or *NULL*
139if no exception has occurred. You normally don't need to call
140:cfunc:`PyErr_Occurred` to see whether an error occurred in a function call,
141since you should be able to tell from the return value.
142
143When a function *f* that calls another function *g* detects that the latter
144fails, *f* should itself return an error value (usually *NULL* or ``-1``). It
145should *not* call one of the :cfunc:`PyErr_\*` functions --- one has already
146been called by *g*. *f*'s caller is then supposed to also return an error
147indication to *its* caller, again *without* calling :cfunc:`PyErr_\*`, and so on
148--- the most detailed cause of the error was already reported by the function
149that first detected it. Once the error reaches the Python interpreter's main
150loop, this aborts the currently executing Python code and tries to find an
151exception handler specified by the Python programmer.
152
153(There are situations where a module can actually give a more detailed error
154message by calling another :cfunc:`PyErr_\*` function, and in such cases it is
155fine to do so. As a general rule, however, this is not necessary, and can cause
156information about the cause of the error to be lost: most operations can fail
157for a variety of reasons.)
158
159To ignore an exception set by a function call that failed, the exception
160condition must be cleared explicitly by calling :cfunc:`PyErr_Clear`. The only
161time C code should call :cfunc:`PyErr_Clear` is if it doesn't want to pass the
162error on to the interpreter but wants to handle it completely by itself
163(possibly by trying something else, or pretending nothing went wrong).
164
165Every failing :cfunc:`malloc` call must be turned into an exception --- the
166direct caller of :cfunc:`malloc` (or :cfunc:`realloc`) must call
167:cfunc:`PyErr_NoMemory` and return a failure indicator itself. All the
Georg Brandl9914dd32007-12-02 23:08:39 +0000168object-creating functions (for example, :cfunc:`PyLong_FromLong`) already do
Georg Brandl116aa622007-08-15 14:28:22 +0000169this, so this note is only relevant to those who call :cfunc:`malloc` directly.
170
171Also note that, with the important exception of :cfunc:`PyArg_ParseTuple` and
172friends, functions that return an integer status usually return a positive value
173or zero for success and ``-1`` for failure, like Unix system calls.
174
175Finally, be careful to clean up garbage (by making :cfunc:`Py_XDECREF` or
176:cfunc:`Py_DECREF` calls for objects you have already created) when you return
177an error indicator!
178
179The choice of which exception to raise is entirely yours. There are predeclared
180C objects corresponding to all built-in Python exceptions, such as
181:cdata:`PyExc_ZeroDivisionError`, which you can use directly. Of course, you
182should choose exceptions wisely --- don't use :cdata:`PyExc_TypeError` to mean
183that a file couldn't be opened (that should probably be :cdata:`PyExc_IOError`).
184If something's wrong with the argument list, the :cfunc:`PyArg_ParseTuple`
185function usually raises :cdata:`PyExc_TypeError`. If you have an argument whose
186value must be in a particular range or must satisfy other conditions,
187:cdata:`PyExc_ValueError` is appropriate.
188
189You can also define a new exception that is unique to your module. For this, you
190usually declare a static object variable at the beginning of your file::
191
192 static PyObject *SpamError;
193
Martin v. Löwis1a214512008-06-11 05:26:20 +0000194and initialize it in your module's initialization function (:cfunc:`PyInit_spam`)
Georg Brandl116aa622007-08-15 14:28:22 +0000195with an exception object (leaving out the error checking for now)::
196
197 PyMODINIT_FUNC
Martin v. Löwis1a214512008-06-11 05:26:20 +0000198 PyInit_spam(void)
Georg Brandl116aa622007-08-15 14:28:22 +0000199 {
200 PyObject *m;
201
Martin v. Löwis1a214512008-06-11 05:26:20 +0000202 m = PyModule_Create(&spammodule);
Georg Brandl116aa622007-08-15 14:28:22 +0000203 if (m == NULL)
Martin v. Löwis1a214512008-06-11 05:26:20 +0000204 return NULL;
Georg Brandl116aa622007-08-15 14:28:22 +0000205
206 SpamError = PyErr_NewException("spam.error", NULL, NULL);
207 Py_INCREF(SpamError);
208 PyModule_AddObject(m, "error", SpamError);
Martin v. Löwis1a214512008-06-11 05:26:20 +0000209 return m;
Georg Brandl116aa622007-08-15 14:28:22 +0000210 }
211
212Note that the Python name for the exception object is :exc:`spam.error`. The
213:cfunc:`PyErr_NewException` function may create a class with the base class
214being :exc:`Exception` (unless another class is passed in instead of *NULL*),
215described in :ref:`bltin-exceptions`.
216
217Note also that the :cdata:`SpamError` variable retains a reference to the newly
218created exception class; this is intentional! Since the exception could be
219removed from the module by external code, an owned reference to the class is
220needed to ensure that it will not be discarded, causing :cdata:`SpamError` to
221become a dangling pointer. Should it become a dangling pointer, C code which
222raises the exception could cause a core dump or other unintended side effects.
223
224We discuss the use of PyMODINIT_FUNC as a function return type later in this
225sample.
226
227
228.. _backtoexample:
229
230Back to the Example
231===================
232
233Going back to our example function, you should now be able to understand this
234statement::
235
236 if (!PyArg_ParseTuple(args, "s", &command))
237 return NULL;
238
239It returns *NULL* (the error indicator for functions returning object pointers)
240if an error is detected in the argument list, relying on the exception set by
241:cfunc:`PyArg_ParseTuple`. Otherwise the string value of the argument has been
242copied to the local variable :cdata:`command`. This is a pointer assignment and
243you are not supposed to modify the string to which it points (so in Standard C,
244the variable :cdata:`command` should properly be declared as ``const char
245*command``).
246
247The next statement is a call to the Unix function :cfunc:`system`, passing it
248the string we just got from :cfunc:`PyArg_ParseTuple`::
249
250 sts = system(command);
251
252Our :func:`spam.system` function must return the value of :cdata:`sts` as a
253Python object. This is done using the function :cfunc:`Py_BuildValue`, which is
254something like the inverse of :cfunc:`PyArg_ParseTuple`: it takes a format
255string and an arbitrary number of C values, and returns a new Python object.
256More info on :cfunc:`Py_BuildValue` is given later. ::
257
258 return Py_BuildValue("i", sts);
259
260In this case, it will return an integer object. (Yes, even integers are objects
261on the heap in Python!)
262
263If you have a C function that returns no useful argument (a function returning
264:ctype:`void`), the corresponding Python function must return ``None``. You
265need this idiom to do so (which is implemented by the :cmacro:`Py_RETURN_NONE`
266macro)::
267
268 Py_INCREF(Py_None);
269 return Py_None;
270
271:cdata:`Py_None` is the C name for the special Python object ``None``. It is a
272genuine Python object rather than a *NULL* pointer, which means "error" in most
273contexts, as we have seen.
274
275
276.. _methodtable:
277
278The Module's Method Table and Initialization Function
279=====================================================
280
281I promised to show how :cfunc:`spam_system` is called from Python programs.
282First, we need to list its name and address in a "method table"::
283
284 static PyMethodDef SpamMethods[] = {
285 ...
286 {"system", spam_system, METH_VARARGS,
287 "Execute a shell command."},
288 ...
289 {NULL, NULL, 0, NULL} /* Sentinel */
290 };
291
292Note the third entry (``METH_VARARGS``). This is a flag telling the interpreter
293the calling convention to be used for the C function. It should normally always
294be ``METH_VARARGS`` or ``METH_VARARGS | METH_KEYWORDS``; a value of ``0`` means
295that an obsolete variant of :cfunc:`PyArg_ParseTuple` is used.
296
297When using only ``METH_VARARGS``, the function should expect the Python-level
298parameters to be passed in as a tuple acceptable for parsing via
299:cfunc:`PyArg_ParseTuple`; more information on this function is provided below.
300
301The :const:`METH_KEYWORDS` bit may be set in the third field if keyword
302arguments should be passed to the function. In this case, the C function should
303accept a third ``PyObject *`` parameter which will be a dictionary of keywords.
304Use :cfunc:`PyArg_ParseTupleAndKeywords` to parse the arguments to such a
305function.
306
Martin v. Löwis1a214512008-06-11 05:26:20 +0000307The method table must be referenced in the module definition structure::
308
309 struct PyModuleDef spammodule = {
310 PyModuleDef_HEAD_INIT,
311 "spam", /* name of module */
312 spam_doc, /* module documentation, may be NULL */
313 -1, /* size of per-interpreter state of the module,
314 or -1 if the module keeps state in global variables. */
315 SpamMethods
316 };
317
318This structure, in turn, must be passed to the interpreter in the module's
Georg Brandl116aa622007-08-15 14:28:22 +0000319initialization function. The initialization function must be named
Martin v. Löwis1a214512008-06-11 05:26:20 +0000320:cfunc:`PyInit_name`, where *name* is the name of the module, and should be the
Christian Heimes5b5e81c2007-12-31 16:14:33 +0000321only non-\ ``static`` item defined in the module file::
Georg Brandl116aa622007-08-15 14:28:22 +0000322
323 PyMODINIT_FUNC
Martin v. Löwis1a214512008-06-11 05:26:20 +0000324 PyInit_spam(void)
Georg Brandl116aa622007-08-15 14:28:22 +0000325 {
Martin v. Löwis1a214512008-06-11 05:26:20 +0000326 return PyModule_Create(&spammodule);
Georg Brandl116aa622007-08-15 14:28:22 +0000327 }
328
329Note that PyMODINIT_FUNC declares the function as ``void`` return type,
330declares any special linkage declarations required by the platform, and for C++
331declares the function as ``extern "C"``.
332
333When the Python program imports module :mod:`spam` for the first time,
Martin v. Löwis1a214512008-06-11 05:26:20 +0000334:cfunc:`PyInit_spam` is called. (See below for comments about embedding Python.)
335It calls :cfunc:`PyModule_Create`, which returns a module object, and
Georg Brandl116aa622007-08-15 14:28:22 +0000336inserts built-in function objects into the newly created module based upon the
Martin v. Löwis1a214512008-06-11 05:26:20 +0000337table (an array of :ctype:`PyMethodDef` structures) found in the module definition.
338:cfunc:`PyModule_Create` returns a pointer to the module object
339that it creates. It may abort with a fatal error for
Georg Brandl116aa622007-08-15 14:28:22 +0000340certain errors, or return *NULL* if the module could not be initialized
Martin v. Löwis1a214512008-06-11 05:26:20 +0000341satisfactorily. The init function must return the module object to its caller,
342so that it then gets inserted into ``sys.modules``.
Georg Brandl116aa622007-08-15 14:28:22 +0000343
Martin v. Löwis1a214512008-06-11 05:26:20 +0000344When embedding Python, the :cfunc:`PyInit_spam` function is not called
Georg Brandl116aa622007-08-15 14:28:22 +0000345automatically unless there's an entry in the :cdata:`_PyImport_Inittab` table.
Martin v. Löwis1a214512008-06-11 05:26:20 +0000346To add the module to the initialization table, use :cfunc:`PyImport_AppendInittab`,
347optionally followed by an import of the module::
Georg Brandl116aa622007-08-15 14:28:22 +0000348
349 int
350 main(int argc, char *argv[])
351 {
Martin v. Löwis1a214512008-06-11 05:26:20 +0000352 /* Add a builtin module, before Py_Initialize */
353 PyImport_AppendInittab("spam", PyInit_spam);
354
Georg Brandl116aa622007-08-15 14:28:22 +0000355 /* Pass argv[0] to the Python interpreter */
356 Py_SetProgramName(argv[0]);
357
358 /* Initialize the Python interpreter. Required. */
359 Py_Initialize();
360
Martin v. Löwis1a214512008-06-11 05:26:20 +0000361 /* Optionally import the module; alternatively,
362 import can be deferred until the embedded script
363 imports it. */
364 PyImport_ImportModule("spam");
Georg Brandl116aa622007-08-15 14:28:22 +0000365
366An example may be found in the file :file:`Demo/embed/demo.c` in the Python
367source distribution.
368
369.. note::
370
371 Removing entries from ``sys.modules`` or importing compiled modules into
372 multiple interpreters within a process (or following a :cfunc:`fork` without an
373 intervening :cfunc:`exec`) can create problems for some extension modules.
374 Extension module authors should exercise caution when initializing internal data
375 structures.
376
377A more substantial example module is included in the Python source distribution
378as :file:`Modules/xxmodule.c`. This file may be used as a template or simply
379read as an example. The :program:`modulator.py` script included in the source
380distribution or Windows install provides a simple graphical user interface for
381declaring the functions and objects which a module should implement, and can
382generate a template which can be filled in. The script lives in the
383:file:`Tools/modulator/` directory; see the :file:`README` file there for more
384information.
385
386
387.. _compilation:
388
389Compilation and Linkage
390=======================
391
392There are two more things to do before you can use your new extension: compiling
393and linking it with the Python system. If you use dynamic loading, the details
394may depend on the style of dynamic loading your system uses; see the chapters
395about building extension modules (chapter :ref:`building`) and additional
396information that pertains only to building on Windows (chapter
397:ref:`building-on-windows`) for more information about this.
398
399If you can't use dynamic loading, or if you want to make your module a permanent
400part of the Python interpreter, you will have to change the configuration setup
401and rebuild the interpreter. Luckily, this is very simple on Unix: just place
402your file (:file:`spammodule.c` for example) in the :file:`Modules/` directory
403of an unpacked source distribution, add a line to the file
404:file:`Modules/Setup.local` describing your file::
405
406 spam spammodule.o
407
408and rebuild the interpreter by running :program:`make` in the toplevel
409directory. You can also run :program:`make` in the :file:`Modules/`
410subdirectory, but then you must first rebuild :file:`Makefile` there by running
411':program:`make` Makefile'. (This is necessary each time you change the
412:file:`Setup` file.)
413
414If your module requires additional libraries to link with, these can be listed
415on the line in the configuration file as well, for instance::
416
417 spam spammodule.o -lX11
418
419
420.. _callingpython:
421
422Calling Python Functions from C
423===============================
424
425So far we have concentrated on making C functions callable from Python. The
426reverse is also useful: calling Python functions from C. This is especially the
427case for libraries that support so-called "callback" functions. If a C
428interface makes use of callbacks, the equivalent Python often needs to provide a
429callback mechanism to the Python programmer; the implementation will require
430calling the Python callback functions from a C callback. Other uses are also
431imaginable.
432
433Fortunately, the Python interpreter is easily called recursively, and there is a
434standard interface to call a Python function. (I won't dwell on how to call the
435Python parser with a particular string as input --- if you're interested, have a
436look at the implementation of the :option:`-c` command line option in
Georg Brandl22291c52007-09-06 14:49:02 +0000437:file:`Modules/main.c` from the Python source code.)
Georg Brandl116aa622007-08-15 14:28:22 +0000438
439Calling a Python function is easy. First, the Python program must somehow pass
440you the Python function object. You should provide a function (or some other
441interface) to do this. When this function is called, save a pointer to the
442Python function object (be careful to :cfunc:`Py_INCREF` it!) in a global
443variable --- or wherever you see fit. For example, the following function might
444be part of a module definition::
445
446 static PyObject *my_callback = NULL;
447
448 static PyObject *
449 my_set_callback(PyObject *dummy, PyObject *args)
450 {
451 PyObject *result = NULL;
452 PyObject *temp;
453
454 if (PyArg_ParseTuple(args, "O:set_callback", &temp)) {
455 if (!PyCallable_Check(temp)) {
456 PyErr_SetString(PyExc_TypeError, "parameter must be callable");
457 return NULL;
458 }
459 Py_XINCREF(temp); /* Add a reference to new callback */
460 Py_XDECREF(my_callback); /* Dispose of previous callback */
461 my_callback = temp; /* Remember new callback */
462 /* Boilerplate to return "None" */
463 Py_INCREF(Py_None);
464 result = Py_None;
465 }
466 return result;
467 }
468
469This function must be registered with the interpreter using the
470:const:`METH_VARARGS` flag; this is described in section :ref:`methodtable`. The
471:cfunc:`PyArg_ParseTuple` function and its arguments are documented in section
472:ref:`parsetuple`.
473
474The macros :cfunc:`Py_XINCREF` and :cfunc:`Py_XDECREF` increment/decrement the
475reference count of an object and are safe in the presence of *NULL* pointers
476(but note that *temp* will not be *NULL* in this context). More info on them
477in section :ref:`refcounts`.
478
479.. index:: single: PyEval_CallObject()
480
481Later, when it is time to call the function, you call the C function
482:cfunc:`PyEval_CallObject`. This function has two arguments, both pointers to
483arbitrary Python objects: the Python function, and the argument list. The
484argument list must always be a tuple object, whose length is the number of
Christian Heimesd8654cf2007-12-02 15:22:16 +0000485arguments. To call the Python function with no arguments, pass in NULL, or
486an empty tuple; to call it with one argument, pass a singleton tuple.
487:cfunc:`Py_BuildValue` returns a tuple when its format string consists of zero
488or more format codes between parentheses. For example::
Georg Brandl116aa622007-08-15 14:28:22 +0000489
490 int arg;
491 PyObject *arglist;
492 PyObject *result;
493 ...
494 arg = 123;
495 ...
496 /* Time to call the callback */
497 arglist = Py_BuildValue("(i)", arg);
498 result = PyEval_CallObject(my_callback, arglist);
499 Py_DECREF(arglist);
500
501:cfunc:`PyEval_CallObject` returns a Python object pointer: this is the return
502value of the Python function. :cfunc:`PyEval_CallObject` is
503"reference-count-neutral" with respect to its arguments. In the example a new
504tuple was created to serve as the argument list, which is :cfunc:`Py_DECREF`\
505-ed immediately after the call.
506
507The return value of :cfunc:`PyEval_CallObject` is "new": either it is a brand
508new object, or it is an existing object whose reference count has been
509incremented. So, unless you want to save it in a global variable, you should
510somehow :cfunc:`Py_DECREF` the result, even (especially!) if you are not
511interested in its value.
512
513Before you do this, however, it is important to check that the return value
514isn't *NULL*. If it is, the Python function terminated by raising an exception.
515If the C code that called :cfunc:`PyEval_CallObject` is called from Python, it
516should now return an error indication to its Python caller, so the interpreter
517can print a stack trace, or the calling Python code can handle the exception.
518If this is not possible or desirable, the exception should be cleared by calling
519:cfunc:`PyErr_Clear`. For example::
520
521 if (result == NULL)
522 return NULL; /* Pass error back */
523 ...use result...
524 Py_DECREF(result);
525
526Depending on the desired interface to the Python callback function, you may also
527have to provide an argument list to :cfunc:`PyEval_CallObject`. In some cases
528the argument list is also provided by the Python program, through the same
529interface that specified the callback function. It can then be saved and used
530in the same manner as the function object. In other cases, you may have to
531construct a new tuple to pass as the argument list. The simplest way to do this
532is to call :cfunc:`Py_BuildValue`. For example, if you want to pass an integral
533event code, you might use the following code::
534
535 PyObject *arglist;
536 ...
537 arglist = Py_BuildValue("(l)", eventcode);
538 result = PyEval_CallObject(my_callback, arglist);
539 Py_DECREF(arglist);
540 if (result == NULL)
541 return NULL; /* Pass error back */
542 /* Here maybe use the result */
543 Py_DECREF(result);
544
545Note the placement of ``Py_DECREF(arglist)`` immediately after the call, before
Christian Heimesd8654cf2007-12-02 15:22:16 +0000546the error check! Also note that strictly speaking this code is not complete:
Georg Brandl116aa622007-08-15 14:28:22 +0000547:cfunc:`Py_BuildValue` may run out of memory, and this should be checked.
548
Christian Heimesd8654cf2007-12-02 15:22:16 +0000549You may also call a function with keyword arguments by using
550:cfunc:`PyEval_CallObjectWithKeywords`. As in the above example, we use
551:cfunc:`Py_BuildValue` to construct the dictionary. ::
552
553 PyObject *dict;
554 ...
555 dict = Py_BuildValue("{s:i}", "name", val);
556 result = PyEval_CallObjectWithKeywords(my_callback, NULL, dict);
557 Py_DECREF(dict);
558 if (result == NULL)
559 return NULL; /* Pass error back */
560 /* Here maybe use the result */
561 Py_DECREF(result);
Georg Brandl116aa622007-08-15 14:28:22 +0000562
563.. _parsetuple:
564
565Extracting Parameters in Extension Functions
566============================================
567
568.. index:: single: PyArg_ParseTuple()
569
570The :cfunc:`PyArg_ParseTuple` function is declared as follows::
571
572 int PyArg_ParseTuple(PyObject *arg, char *format, ...);
573
574The *arg* argument must be a tuple object containing an argument list passed
575from Python to a C function. The *format* argument must be a format string,
576whose syntax is explained in :ref:`arg-parsing` in the Python/C API Reference
577Manual. The remaining arguments must be addresses of variables whose type is
578determined by the format string.
579
580Note that while :cfunc:`PyArg_ParseTuple` checks that the Python arguments have
581the required types, it cannot check the validity of the addresses of C variables
582passed to the call: if you make mistakes there, your code will probably crash or
583at least overwrite random bits in memory. So be careful!
584
585Note that any Python object references which are provided to the caller are
586*borrowed* references; do not decrement their reference count!
587
588Some example calls::
589
590 int ok;
591 int i, j;
592 long k, l;
593 const char *s;
594 int size;
595
596 ok = PyArg_ParseTuple(args, ""); /* No arguments */
597 /* Python call: f() */
598
599::
600
601 ok = PyArg_ParseTuple(args, "s", &s); /* A string */
602 /* Possible Python call: f('whoops!') */
603
604::
605
606 ok = PyArg_ParseTuple(args, "lls", &k, &l, &s); /* Two longs and a string */
607 /* Possible Python call: f(1, 2, 'three') */
608
609::
610
611 ok = PyArg_ParseTuple(args, "(ii)s#", &i, &j, &s, &size);
612 /* A pair of ints and a string, whose size is also returned */
613 /* Possible Python call: f((1, 2), 'three') */
614
615::
616
617 {
618 const char *file;
619 const char *mode = "r";
620 int bufsize = 0;
621 ok = PyArg_ParseTuple(args, "s|si", &file, &mode, &bufsize);
622 /* A string, and optionally another string and an integer */
623 /* Possible Python calls:
624 f('spam')
625 f('spam', 'w')
626 f('spam', 'wb', 100000) */
627 }
628
629::
630
631 {
632 int left, top, right, bottom, h, v;
633 ok = PyArg_ParseTuple(args, "((ii)(ii))(ii)",
634 &left, &top, &right, &bottom, &h, &v);
635 /* A rectangle and a point */
636 /* Possible Python call:
637 f(((0, 0), (400, 300)), (10, 10)) */
638 }
639
640::
641
642 {
643 Py_complex c;
644 ok = PyArg_ParseTuple(args, "D:myfunction", &c);
645 /* a complex, also providing a function name for errors */
646 /* Possible Python call: myfunction(1+2j) */
647 }
648
649
650.. _parsetupleandkeywords:
651
652Keyword Parameters for Extension Functions
653==========================================
654
655.. index:: single: PyArg_ParseTupleAndKeywords()
656
657The :cfunc:`PyArg_ParseTupleAndKeywords` function is declared as follows::
658
659 int PyArg_ParseTupleAndKeywords(PyObject *arg, PyObject *kwdict,
660 char *format, char *kwlist[], ...);
661
662The *arg* and *format* parameters are identical to those of the
663:cfunc:`PyArg_ParseTuple` function. The *kwdict* parameter is the dictionary of
664keywords received as the third parameter from the Python runtime. The *kwlist*
665parameter is a *NULL*-terminated list of strings which identify the parameters;
666the names are matched with the type information from *format* from left to
667right. On success, :cfunc:`PyArg_ParseTupleAndKeywords` returns true, otherwise
668it returns false and raises an appropriate exception.
669
670.. note::
671
672 Nested tuples cannot be parsed when using keyword arguments! Keyword parameters
673 passed in which are not present in the *kwlist* will cause :exc:`TypeError` to
674 be raised.
675
676.. index:: single: Philbrick, Geoff
677
678Here is an example module which uses keywords, based on an example by Geoff
Christian Heimes5b5e81c2007-12-31 16:14:33 +0000679Philbrick (philbrick@hks.com)::
Georg Brandl116aa622007-08-15 14:28:22 +0000680
681 #include "Python.h"
682
683 static PyObject *
684 keywdarg_parrot(PyObject *self, PyObject *args, PyObject *keywds)
685 {
686 int voltage;
687 char *state = "a stiff";
688 char *action = "voom";
689 char *type = "Norwegian Blue";
690
691 static char *kwlist[] = {"voltage", "state", "action", "type", NULL};
692
693 if (!PyArg_ParseTupleAndKeywords(args, keywds, "i|sss", kwlist,
694 &voltage, &state, &action, &type))
695 return NULL;
696
697 printf("-- This parrot wouldn't %s if you put %i Volts through it.\n",
698 action, voltage);
699 printf("-- Lovely plumage, the %s -- It's %s!\n", type, state);
700
701 Py_INCREF(Py_None);
702
703 return Py_None;
704 }
705
706 static PyMethodDef keywdarg_methods[] = {
707 /* The cast of the function is necessary since PyCFunction values
708 * only take two PyObject* parameters, and keywdarg_parrot() takes
709 * three.
710 */
711 {"parrot", (PyCFunction)keywdarg_parrot, METH_VARARGS | METH_KEYWORDS,
712 "Print a lovely skit to standard output."},
713 {NULL, NULL, 0, NULL} /* sentinel */
714 };
715
716::
717
718 void
719 initkeywdarg(void)
720 {
721 /* Create the module and add the functions */
722 Py_InitModule("keywdarg", keywdarg_methods);
723 }
724
725
726.. _buildvalue:
727
728Building Arbitrary Values
729=========================
730
731This function is the counterpart to :cfunc:`PyArg_ParseTuple`. It is declared
732as follows::
733
734 PyObject *Py_BuildValue(char *format, ...);
735
736It recognizes a set of format units similar to the ones recognized by
737:cfunc:`PyArg_ParseTuple`, but the arguments (which are input to the function,
738not output) must not be pointers, just values. It returns a new Python object,
739suitable for returning from a C function called from Python.
740
741One difference with :cfunc:`PyArg_ParseTuple`: while the latter requires its
742first argument to be a tuple (since Python argument lists are always represented
743as tuples internally), :cfunc:`Py_BuildValue` does not always build a tuple. It
744builds a tuple only if its format string contains two or more format units. If
745the format string is empty, it returns ``None``; if it contains exactly one
746format unit, it returns whatever object is described by that format unit. To
747force it to return a tuple of size 0 or one, parenthesize the format string.
748
749Examples (to the left the call, to the right the resulting Python value)::
750
751 Py_BuildValue("") None
752 Py_BuildValue("i", 123) 123
753 Py_BuildValue("iii", 123, 456, 789) (123, 456, 789)
754 Py_BuildValue("s", "hello") 'hello'
755 Py_BuildValue("y", "hello") b'hello'
756 Py_BuildValue("ss", "hello", "world") ('hello', 'world')
757 Py_BuildValue("s#", "hello", 4) 'hell'
758 Py_BuildValue("y#", "hello", 4) b'hell'
759 Py_BuildValue("()") ()
760 Py_BuildValue("(i)", 123) (123,)
761 Py_BuildValue("(ii)", 123, 456) (123, 456)
762 Py_BuildValue("(i,i)", 123, 456) (123, 456)
763 Py_BuildValue("[i,i]", 123, 456) [123, 456]
764 Py_BuildValue("{s:i,s:i}",
765 "abc", 123, "def", 456) {'abc': 123, 'def': 456}
766 Py_BuildValue("((ii)(ii)) (ii)",
767 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) (((1, 2), (3, 4)), (5, 6))
768
769
770.. _refcounts:
771
772Reference Counts
773================
774
775In languages like C or C++, the programmer is responsible for dynamic allocation
776and deallocation of memory on the heap. In C, this is done using the functions
Christian Heimes5b5e81c2007-12-31 16:14:33 +0000777:cfunc:`malloc` and :cfunc:`free`. In C++, the operators ``new`` and
778``delete`` are used with essentially the same meaning and we'll restrict
Georg Brandl116aa622007-08-15 14:28:22 +0000779the following discussion to the C case.
780
781Every block of memory allocated with :cfunc:`malloc` should eventually be
782returned to the pool of available memory by exactly one call to :cfunc:`free`.
783It is important to call :cfunc:`free` at the right time. If a block's address
784is forgotten but :cfunc:`free` is not called for it, the memory it occupies
785cannot be reused until the program terminates. This is called a :dfn:`memory
786leak`. On the other hand, if a program calls :cfunc:`free` for a block and then
787continues to use the block, it creates a conflict with re-use of the block
788through another :cfunc:`malloc` call. This is called :dfn:`using freed memory`.
789It has the same bad consequences as referencing uninitialized data --- core
790dumps, wrong results, mysterious crashes.
791
792Common causes of memory leaks are unusual paths through the code. For instance,
793a function may allocate a block of memory, do some calculation, and then free
794the block again. Now a change in the requirements for the function may add a
795test to the calculation that detects an error condition and can return
796prematurely from the function. It's easy to forget to free the allocated memory
797block when taking this premature exit, especially when it is added later to the
798code. Such leaks, once introduced, often go undetected for a long time: the
799error exit is taken only in a small fraction of all calls, and most modern
800machines have plenty of virtual memory, so the leak only becomes apparent in a
801long-running process that uses the leaking function frequently. Therefore, it's
802important to prevent leaks from happening by having a coding convention or
803strategy that minimizes this kind of errors.
804
805Since Python makes heavy use of :cfunc:`malloc` and :cfunc:`free`, it needs a
806strategy to avoid memory leaks as well as the use of freed memory. The chosen
807method is called :dfn:`reference counting`. The principle is simple: every
808object contains a counter, which is incremented when a reference to the object
809is stored somewhere, and which is decremented when a reference to it is deleted.
810When the counter reaches zero, the last reference to the object has been deleted
811and the object is freed.
812
813An alternative strategy is called :dfn:`automatic garbage collection`.
814(Sometimes, reference counting is also referred to as a garbage collection
815strategy, hence my use of "automatic" to distinguish the two.) The big
816advantage of automatic garbage collection is that the user doesn't need to call
817:cfunc:`free` explicitly. (Another claimed advantage is an improvement in speed
818or memory usage --- this is no hard fact however.) The disadvantage is that for
819C, there is no truly portable automatic garbage collector, while reference
820counting can be implemented portably (as long as the functions :cfunc:`malloc`
821and :cfunc:`free` are available --- which the C Standard guarantees). Maybe some
822day a sufficiently portable automatic garbage collector will be available for C.
823Until then, we'll have to live with reference counts.
824
825While Python uses the traditional reference counting implementation, it also
826offers a cycle detector that works to detect reference cycles. This allows
827applications to not worry about creating direct or indirect circular references;
828these are the weakness of garbage collection implemented using only reference
829counting. Reference cycles consist of objects which contain (possibly indirect)
830references to themselves, so that each object in the cycle has a reference count
831which is non-zero. Typical reference counting implementations are not able to
832reclaim the memory belonging to any objects in a reference cycle, or referenced
833from the objects in the cycle, even though there are no further references to
834the cycle itself.
835
836The cycle detector is able to detect garbage cycles and can reclaim them so long
837as there are no finalizers implemented in Python (:meth:`__del__` methods).
838When there are such finalizers, the detector exposes the cycles through the
839:mod:`gc` module (specifically, the
840``garbage`` variable in that module). The :mod:`gc` module also exposes a way
841to run the detector (the :func:`collect` function), as well as configuration
842interfaces and the ability to disable the detector at runtime. The cycle
843detector is considered an optional component; though it is included by default,
844it can be disabled at build time using the :option:`--without-cycle-gc` option
Georg Brandlf6945182008-02-01 11:56:49 +0000845to the :program:`configure` script on Unix platforms (including Mac OS X). If
846the cycle detector is disabled in this way, the :mod:`gc` module will not be
847available.
Georg Brandl116aa622007-08-15 14:28:22 +0000848
849
850.. _refcountsinpython:
851
852Reference Counting in Python
853----------------------------
854
855There are two macros, ``Py_INCREF(x)`` and ``Py_DECREF(x)``, which handle the
856incrementing and decrementing of the reference count. :cfunc:`Py_DECREF` also
857frees the object when the count reaches zero. For flexibility, it doesn't call
858:cfunc:`free` directly --- rather, it makes a call through a function pointer in
859the object's :dfn:`type object`. For this purpose (and others), every object
860also contains a pointer to its type object.
861
862The big question now remains: when to use ``Py_INCREF(x)`` and ``Py_DECREF(x)``?
863Let's first introduce some terms. Nobody "owns" an object; however, you can
864:dfn:`own a reference` to an object. An object's reference count is now defined
865as the number of owned references to it. The owner of a reference is
866responsible for calling :cfunc:`Py_DECREF` when the reference is no longer
867needed. Ownership of a reference can be transferred. There are three ways to
868dispose of an owned reference: pass it on, store it, or call :cfunc:`Py_DECREF`.
869Forgetting to dispose of an owned reference creates a memory leak.
870
871It is also possible to :dfn:`borrow` [#]_ a reference to an object. The
872borrower of a reference should not call :cfunc:`Py_DECREF`. The borrower must
873not hold on to the object longer than the owner from which it was borrowed.
874Using a borrowed reference after the owner has disposed of it risks using freed
875memory and should be avoided completely. [#]_
876
877The advantage of borrowing over owning a reference is that you don't need to
878take care of disposing of the reference on all possible paths through the code
879--- in other words, with a borrowed reference you don't run the risk of leaking
880when a premature exit is taken. The disadvantage of borrowing over leaking is
881that there are some subtle situations where in seemingly correct code a borrowed
882reference can be used after the owner from which it was borrowed has in fact
883disposed of it.
884
885A borrowed reference can be changed into an owned reference by calling
886:cfunc:`Py_INCREF`. This does not affect the status of the owner from which the
887reference was borrowed --- it creates a new owned reference, and gives full
888owner responsibilities (the new owner must dispose of the reference properly, as
889well as the previous owner).
890
891
892.. _ownershiprules:
893
894Ownership Rules
895---------------
896
897Whenever an object reference is passed into or out of a function, it is part of
898the function's interface specification whether ownership is transferred with the
899reference or not.
900
901Most functions that return a reference to an object pass on ownership with the
902reference. In particular, all functions whose function it is to create a new
Georg Brandl9914dd32007-12-02 23:08:39 +0000903object, such as :cfunc:`PyLong_FromLong` and :cfunc:`Py_BuildValue`, pass
Georg Brandl116aa622007-08-15 14:28:22 +0000904ownership to the receiver. Even if the object is not actually new, you still
905receive ownership of a new reference to that object. For instance,
Georg Brandl9914dd32007-12-02 23:08:39 +0000906:cfunc:`PyLong_FromLong` maintains a cache of popular values and can return a
Georg Brandl116aa622007-08-15 14:28:22 +0000907reference to a cached item.
908
909Many functions that extract objects from other objects also transfer ownership
910with the reference, for instance :cfunc:`PyObject_GetAttrString`. The picture
911is less clear, here, however, since a few common routines are exceptions:
912:cfunc:`PyTuple_GetItem`, :cfunc:`PyList_GetItem`, :cfunc:`PyDict_GetItem`, and
913:cfunc:`PyDict_GetItemString` all return references that you borrow from the
914tuple, list or dictionary.
915
916The function :cfunc:`PyImport_AddModule` also returns a borrowed reference, even
917though it may actually create the object it returns: this is possible because an
918owned reference to the object is stored in ``sys.modules``.
919
920When you pass an object reference into another function, in general, the
921function borrows the reference from you --- if it needs to store it, it will use
922:cfunc:`Py_INCREF` to become an independent owner. There are exactly two
923important exceptions to this rule: :cfunc:`PyTuple_SetItem` and
924:cfunc:`PyList_SetItem`. These functions take over ownership of the item passed
925to them --- even if they fail! (Note that :cfunc:`PyDict_SetItem` and friends
926don't take over ownership --- they are "normal.")
927
928When a C function is called from Python, it borrows references to its arguments
929from the caller. The caller owns a reference to the object, so the borrowed
930reference's lifetime is guaranteed until the function returns. Only when such a
931borrowed reference must be stored or passed on, it must be turned into an owned
932reference by calling :cfunc:`Py_INCREF`.
933
934The object reference returned from a C function that is called from Python must
935be an owned reference --- ownership is transferred from the function to its
936caller.
937
938
939.. _thinice:
940
941Thin Ice
942--------
943
944There are a few situations where seemingly harmless use of a borrowed reference
945can lead to problems. These all have to do with implicit invocations of the
946interpreter, which can cause the owner of a reference to dispose of it.
947
948The first and most important case to know about is using :cfunc:`Py_DECREF` on
949an unrelated object while borrowing a reference to a list item. For instance::
950
951 void
952 bug(PyObject *list)
953 {
954 PyObject *item = PyList_GetItem(list, 0);
955
Georg Brandl9914dd32007-12-02 23:08:39 +0000956 PyList_SetItem(list, 1, PyLong_FromLong(0L));
Georg Brandl116aa622007-08-15 14:28:22 +0000957 PyObject_Print(item, stdout, 0); /* BUG! */
958 }
959
960This function first borrows a reference to ``list[0]``, then replaces
961``list[1]`` with the value ``0``, and finally prints the borrowed reference.
962Looks harmless, right? But it's not!
963
964Let's follow the control flow into :cfunc:`PyList_SetItem`. The list owns
965references to all its items, so when item 1 is replaced, it has to dispose of
966the original item 1. Now let's suppose the original item 1 was an instance of a
967user-defined class, and let's further suppose that the class defined a
968:meth:`__del__` method. If this class instance has a reference count of 1,
969disposing of it will call its :meth:`__del__` method.
970
971Since it is written in Python, the :meth:`__del__` method can execute arbitrary
972Python code. Could it perhaps do something to invalidate the reference to
973``item`` in :cfunc:`bug`? You bet! Assuming that the list passed into
974:cfunc:`bug` is accessible to the :meth:`__del__` method, it could execute a
975statement to the effect of ``del list[0]``, and assuming this was the last
976reference to that object, it would free the memory associated with it, thereby
977invalidating ``item``.
978
979The solution, once you know the source of the problem, is easy: temporarily
980increment the reference count. The correct version of the function reads::
981
982 void
983 no_bug(PyObject *list)
984 {
985 PyObject *item = PyList_GetItem(list, 0);
986
987 Py_INCREF(item);
Georg Brandl9914dd32007-12-02 23:08:39 +0000988 PyList_SetItem(list, 1, PyLong_FromLong(0L));
Georg Brandl116aa622007-08-15 14:28:22 +0000989 PyObject_Print(item, stdout, 0);
990 Py_DECREF(item);
991 }
992
993This is a true story. An older version of Python contained variants of this bug
994and someone spent a considerable amount of time in a C debugger to figure out
995why his :meth:`__del__` methods would fail...
996
997The second case of problems with a borrowed reference is a variant involving
998threads. Normally, multiple threads in the Python interpreter can't get in each
999other's way, because there is a global lock protecting Python's entire object
1000space. However, it is possible to temporarily release this lock using the macro
1001:cmacro:`Py_BEGIN_ALLOW_THREADS`, and to re-acquire it using
1002:cmacro:`Py_END_ALLOW_THREADS`. This is common around blocking I/O calls, to
1003let other threads use the processor while waiting for the I/O to complete.
1004Obviously, the following function has the same problem as the previous one::
1005
1006 void
1007 bug(PyObject *list)
1008 {
1009 PyObject *item = PyList_GetItem(list, 0);
1010 Py_BEGIN_ALLOW_THREADS
1011 ...some blocking I/O call...
1012 Py_END_ALLOW_THREADS
1013 PyObject_Print(item, stdout, 0); /* BUG! */
1014 }
1015
1016
1017.. _nullpointers:
1018
1019NULL Pointers
1020-------------
1021
1022In general, functions that take object references as arguments do not expect you
1023to pass them *NULL* pointers, and will dump core (or cause later core dumps) if
1024you do so. Functions that return object references generally return *NULL* only
1025to indicate that an exception occurred. The reason for not testing for *NULL*
1026arguments is that functions often pass the objects they receive on to other
1027function --- if each function were to test for *NULL*, there would be a lot of
1028redundant tests and the code would run more slowly.
1029
1030It is better to test for *NULL* only at the "source:" when a pointer that may be
1031*NULL* is received, for example, from :cfunc:`malloc` or from a function that
1032may raise an exception.
1033
1034The macros :cfunc:`Py_INCREF` and :cfunc:`Py_DECREF` do not check for *NULL*
1035pointers --- however, their variants :cfunc:`Py_XINCREF` and :cfunc:`Py_XDECREF`
1036do.
1037
1038The macros for checking for a particular object type (``Pytype_Check()``) don't
1039check for *NULL* pointers --- again, there is much code that calls several of
1040these in a row to test an object against various different expected types, and
1041this would generate redundant tests. There are no variants with *NULL*
1042checking.
1043
1044The C function calling mechanism guarantees that the argument list passed to C
1045functions (``args`` in the examples) is never *NULL* --- in fact it guarantees
1046that it is always a tuple. [#]_
1047
1048It is a severe error to ever let a *NULL* pointer "escape" to the Python user.
1049
Christian Heimes5b5e81c2007-12-31 16:14:33 +00001050.. Frank Stajano:
1051 A pedagogically buggy example, along the lines of the previous listing, would
1052 be helpful here -- showing in more concrete terms what sort of actions could
1053 cause the problem. I can't very well imagine it from the description.
Georg Brandl116aa622007-08-15 14:28:22 +00001054
1055
1056.. _cplusplus:
1057
1058Writing Extensions in C++
1059=========================
1060
1061It is possible to write extension modules in C++. Some restrictions apply. If
1062the main program (the Python interpreter) is compiled and linked by the C
1063compiler, global or static objects with constructors cannot be used. This is
1064not a problem if the main program is linked by the C++ compiler. Functions that
1065will be called by the Python interpreter (in particular, module initialization
1066functions) have to be declared using ``extern "C"``. It is unnecessary to
1067enclose the Python header files in ``extern "C" {...}`` --- they use this form
1068already if the symbol ``__cplusplus`` is defined (all recent C++ compilers
1069define this symbol).
1070
1071
1072.. _using-cobjects:
1073
1074Providing a C API for an Extension Module
1075=========================================
1076
1077.. sectionauthor:: Konrad Hinsen <hinsen@cnrs-orleans.fr>
1078
1079
1080Many extension modules just provide new functions and types to be used from
1081Python, but sometimes the code in an extension module can be useful for other
1082extension modules. For example, an extension module could implement a type
1083"collection" which works like lists without order. Just like the standard Python
1084list type has a C API which permits extension modules to create and manipulate
1085lists, this new collection type should have a set of C functions for direct
1086manipulation from other extension modules.
1087
1088At first sight this seems easy: just write the functions (without declaring them
Christian Heimes5b5e81c2007-12-31 16:14:33 +00001089``static``, of course), provide an appropriate header file, and document
Georg Brandl116aa622007-08-15 14:28:22 +00001090the C API. And in fact this would work if all extension modules were always
1091linked statically with the Python interpreter. When modules are used as shared
1092libraries, however, the symbols defined in one module may not be visible to
1093another module. The details of visibility depend on the operating system; some
1094systems use one global namespace for the Python interpreter and all extension
1095modules (Windows, for example), whereas others require an explicit list of
1096imported symbols at module link time (AIX is one example), or offer a choice of
1097different strategies (most Unices). And even if symbols are globally visible,
1098the module whose functions one wishes to call might not have been loaded yet!
1099
1100Portability therefore requires not to make any assumptions about symbol
1101visibility. This means that all symbols in extension modules should be declared
Christian Heimes5b5e81c2007-12-31 16:14:33 +00001102``static``, except for the module's initialization function, in order to
Georg Brandl116aa622007-08-15 14:28:22 +00001103avoid name clashes with other extension modules (as discussed in section
1104:ref:`methodtable`). And it means that symbols that *should* be accessible from
1105other extension modules must be exported in a different way.
1106
1107Python provides a special mechanism to pass C-level information (pointers) from
1108one extension module to another one: CObjects. A CObject is a Python data type
1109which stores a pointer (:ctype:`void \*`). CObjects can only be created and
1110accessed via their C API, but they can be passed around like any other Python
1111object. In particular, they can be assigned to a name in an extension module's
1112namespace. Other extension modules can then import this module, retrieve the
1113value of this name, and then retrieve the pointer from the CObject.
1114
1115There are many ways in which CObjects can be used to export the C API of an
1116extension module. Each name could get its own CObject, or all C API pointers
1117could be stored in an array whose address is published in a CObject. And the
1118various tasks of storing and retrieving the pointers can be distributed in
1119different ways between the module providing the code and the client modules.
1120
1121The following example demonstrates an approach that puts most of the burden on
1122the writer of the exporting module, which is appropriate for commonly used
1123library modules. It stores all C API pointers (just one in the example!) in an
1124array of :ctype:`void` pointers which becomes the value of a CObject. The header
1125file corresponding to the module provides a macro that takes care of importing
1126the module and retrieving its C API pointers; client modules only have to call
1127this macro before accessing the C API.
1128
1129The exporting module is a modification of the :mod:`spam` module from section
1130:ref:`extending-simpleexample`. The function :func:`spam.system` does not call
1131the C library function :cfunc:`system` directly, but a function
1132:cfunc:`PySpam_System`, which would of course do something more complicated in
1133reality (such as adding "spam" to every command). This function
1134:cfunc:`PySpam_System` is also exported to other extension modules.
1135
1136The function :cfunc:`PySpam_System` is a plain C function, declared
Christian Heimes5b5e81c2007-12-31 16:14:33 +00001137``static`` like everything else::
Georg Brandl116aa622007-08-15 14:28:22 +00001138
1139 static int
1140 PySpam_System(const char *command)
1141 {
1142 return system(command);
1143 }
1144
1145The function :cfunc:`spam_system` is modified in a trivial way::
1146
1147 static PyObject *
1148 spam_system(PyObject *self, PyObject *args)
1149 {
1150 const char *command;
1151 int sts;
1152
1153 if (!PyArg_ParseTuple(args, "s", &command))
1154 return NULL;
1155 sts = PySpam_System(command);
1156 return Py_BuildValue("i", sts);
1157 }
1158
1159In the beginning of the module, right after the line ::
1160
1161 #include "Python.h"
1162
1163two more lines must be added::
1164
1165 #define SPAM_MODULE
1166 #include "spammodule.h"
1167
1168The ``#define`` is used to tell the header file that it is being included in the
1169exporting module, not a client module. Finally, the module's initialization
1170function must take care of initializing the C API pointer array::
1171
1172 PyMODINIT_FUNC
Martin v. Löwis1a214512008-06-11 05:26:20 +00001173 PyInit_spam(void)
Georg Brandl116aa622007-08-15 14:28:22 +00001174 {
1175 PyObject *m;
1176 static void *PySpam_API[PySpam_API_pointers];
1177 PyObject *c_api_object;
1178
Martin v. Löwis1a214512008-06-11 05:26:20 +00001179 m = PyModule_Create(&spammodule);
Georg Brandl116aa622007-08-15 14:28:22 +00001180 if (m == NULL)
Martin v. Löwis1a214512008-06-11 05:26:20 +00001181 return NULL;
Georg Brandl116aa622007-08-15 14:28:22 +00001182
1183 /* Initialize the C API pointer array */
1184 PySpam_API[PySpam_System_NUM] = (void *)PySpam_System;
1185
1186 /* Create a CObject containing the API pointer array's address */
1187 c_api_object = PyCObject_FromVoidPtr((void *)PySpam_API, NULL);
1188
1189 if (c_api_object != NULL)
1190 PyModule_AddObject(m, "_C_API", c_api_object);
Martin v. Löwis1a214512008-06-11 05:26:20 +00001191 return m;
Georg Brandl116aa622007-08-15 14:28:22 +00001192 }
1193
Christian Heimes5b5e81c2007-12-31 16:14:33 +00001194Note that ``PySpam_API`` is declared ``static``; otherwise the pointer
Martin v. Löwis1a214512008-06-11 05:26:20 +00001195array would disappear when :func:`PyInit_spam` terminates!
Georg Brandl116aa622007-08-15 14:28:22 +00001196
1197The bulk of the work is in the header file :file:`spammodule.h`, which looks
1198like this::
1199
1200 #ifndef Py_SPAMMODULE_H
1201 #define Py_SPAMMODULE_H
1202 #ifdef __cplusplus
1203 extern "C" {
1204 #endif
1205
1206 /* Header file for spammodule */
1207
1208 /* C API functions */
1209 #define PySpam_System_NUM 0
1210 #define PySpam_System_RETURN int
1211 #define PySpam_System_PROTO (const char *command)
1212
1213 /* Total number of C API pointers */
1214 #define PySpam_API_pointers 1
1215
1216
1217 #ifdef SPAM_MODULE
1218 /* This section is used when compiling spammodule.c */
1219
1220 static PySpam_System_RETURN PySpam_System PySpam_System_PROTO;
1221
1222 #else
1223 /* This section is used in modules that use spammodule's API */
1224
1225 static void **PySpam_API;
1226
1227 #define PySpam_System \
1228 (*(PySpam_System_RETURN (*)PySpam_System_PROTO) PySpam_API[PySpam_System_NUM])
1229
1230 /* Return -1 and set exception on error, 0 on success. */
1231 static int
1232 import_spam(void)
1233 {
1234 PyObject *module = PyImport_ImportModule("spam");
1235
1236 if (module != NULL) {
1237 PyObject *c_api_object = PyObject_GetAttrString(module, "_C_API");
1238 if (c_api_object == NULL)
1239 return -1;
1240 if (PyCObject_Check(c_api_object))
1241 PySpam_API = (void **)PyCObject_AsVoidPtr(c_api_object);
1242 Py_DECREF(c_api_object);
1243 }
1244 return 0;
1245 }
1246
1247 #endif
1248
1249 #ifdef __cplusplus
1250 }
1251 #endif
1252
1253 #endif /* !defined(Py_SPAMMODULE_H) */
1254
1255All that a client module must do in order to have access to the function
1256:cfunc:`PySpam_System` is to call the function (or rather macro)
1257:cfunc:`import_spam` in its initialization function::
1258
1259 PyMODINIT_FUNC
1260 initclient(void)
1261 {
1262 PyObject *m;
1263
1264 m = Py_InitModule("client", ClientMethods);
1265 if (m == NULL)
1266 return;
1267 if (import_spam() < 0)
1268 return;
1269 /* additional initialization can happen here */
1270 }
1271
1272The main disadvantage of this approach is that the file :file:`spammodule.h` is
1273rather complicated. However, the basic structure is the same for each function
1274that is exported, so it has to be learned only once.
1275
1276Finally it should be mentioned that CObjects offer additional functionality,
1277which is especially useful for memory allocation and deallocation of the pointer
1278stored in a CObject. The details are described in the Python/C API Reference
1279Manual in the section :ref:`cobjects` and in the implementation of CObjects (files
1280:file:`Include/cobject.h` and :file:`Objects/cobject.c` in the Python source
1281code distribution).
1282
1283.. rubric:: Footnotes
1284
1285.. [#] An interface for this function already exists in the standard module :mod:`os`
1286 --- it was chosen as a simple and straightforward example.
1287
1288.. [#] The metaphor of "borrowing" a reference is not completely correct: the owner
1289 still has a copy of the reference.
1290
1291.. [#] Checking that the reference count is at least 1 **does not work** --- the
1292 reference count itself could be in freed memory and may thus be reused for
1293 another object!
1294
1295.. [#] These guarantees don't hold when you use the "old" style calling convention ---
1296 this is still found in much existing code.
1297