blob: 58b74514f365a387d4e8dd70316c9f60f3e47f99 [file] [log] [blame]
Tim Peters95c99e52001-09-03 01:24:30 +00001# This contains most of the executable examples from Guido's descr
2# tutorial, once at
3#
4# http://www.python.org/2.2/descrintro.html
5#
6# A few examples left implicit in the writeup were fleshed out, a few were
7# skipped due to lack of interest (e.g., faking super() by hand isn't
8# of much interest anymore), and a few were fiddled to make the output
9# deterministic.
10
Barry Warsaw04f357c2002-07-23 19:04:11 +000011from test.test_support import sortdict
Tim Peters95c99e52001-09-03 01:24:30 +000012import pprint
13
Tim Petersa427a2b2001-10-29 22:25:45 +000014class defaultdict(dict):
Tim Peters95c99e52001-09-03 01:24:30 +000015 def __init__(self, default=None):
Tim Petersa427a2b2001-10-29 22:25:45 +000016 dict.__init__(self)
Tim Peters95c99e52001-09-03 01:24:30 +000017 self.default = default
18
19 def __getitem__(self, key):
20 try:
Tim Petersa427a2b2001-10-29 22:25:45 +000021 return dict.__getitem__(self, key)
Tim Peters95c99e52001-09-03 01:24:30 +000022 except KeyError:
23 return self.default
24
25 def get(self, key, *args):
26 if not args:
27 args = (self.default,)
Tim Petersa427a2b2001-10-29 22:25:45 +000028 return dict.get(self, key, *args)
Tim Peters95c99e52001-09-03 01:24:30 +000029
30 def merge(self, other):
31 for key in other:
32 if key not in self:
33 self[key] = other[key]
34
35test_1 = """
36
37Here's the new type at work:
38
39 >>> print defaultdict # show our type
Guido van Rossuma4cb7882001-09-25 03:56:29 +000040 <class 'test.test_descrtut.defaultdict'>
Tim Peters95c99e52001-09-03 01:24:30 +000041 >>> print type(defaultdict) # its metatype
42 <type 'type'>
43 >>> a = defaultdict(default=0.0) # create an instance
44 >>> print a # show the instance
45 {}
46 >>> print type(a) # show its type
Guido van Rossuma4cb7882001-09-25 03:56:29 +000047 <class 'test.test_descrtut.defaultdict'>
Tim Peters95c99e52001-09-03 01:24:30 +000048 >>> print a.__class__ # show its class
Guido van Rossuma4cb7882001-09-25 03:56:29 +000049 <class 'test.test_descrtut.defaultdict'>
Tim Peters95c99e52001-09-03 01:24:30 +000050 >>> print type(a) is a.__class__ # its type is its class
Guido van Rossum77f6a652002-04-03 22:41:51 +000051 True
Tim Peters95c99e52001-09-03 01:24:30 +000052 >>> a[1] = 3.25 # modify the instance
53 >>> print a # show the new value
54 {1: 3.25}
55 >>> print a[1] # show the new item
56 3.25
57 >>> print a[0] # a non-existant item
58 0.0
Tim Petersa427a2b2001-10-29 22:25:45 +000059 >>> a.merge({1:100, 2:200}) # use a dict method
Tim Peters95c99e52001-09-03 01:24:30 +000060 >>> print sortdict(a) # show the result
61 {1: 3.25, 2: 200}
62 >>>
63
64We can also use the new type in contexts where classic only allows "real"
65dictionaries, such as the locals/globals dictionaries for the exec
66statement or the built-in function eval():
67
68 >>> def sorted(seq):
69 ... seq.sort()
70 ... return seq
71 >>> print sorted(a.keys())
72 [1, 2]
73 >>> exec "x = 3; print x" in a
74 3
75 >>> print sorted(a.keys())
76 [1, 2, '__builtins__', 'x']
77 >>> print a['x']
78 3
79 >>>
80
81However, our __getitem__() method is not used for variable access by the
82interpreter:
83
84 >>> exec "print foo" in a
85 Traceback (most recent call last):
86 File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
87 File "<string>", line 1, in ?
88 NameError: name 'foo' is not defined
89 >>>
90
91Now I'll show that defaultdict instances have dynamic instance variables,
92just like classic classes:
93
94 >>> a.default = -1
95 >>> print a["noway"]
96 -1
97 >>> a.default = -1000
98 >>> print a["noway"]
99 -1000
Tim Peters5d2b77c2001-09-03 05:47:38 +0000100 >>> 'default' in dir(a)
Guido van Rossum77f6a652002-04-03 22:41:51 +0000101 True
Tim Peters95c99e52001-09-03 01:24:30 +0000102 >>> a.x1 = 100
103 >>> a.x2 = 200
104 >>> print a.x1
105 100
Tim Peters5d2b77c2001-09-03 05:47:38 +0000106 >>> d = dir(a)
107 >>> 'default' in d and 'x1' in d and 'x2' in d
Guido van Rossum77f6a652002-04-03 22:41:51 +0000108 True
Tim Peterse2052ab2003-02-18 16:54:41 +0000109 >>> print sortdict(a.__dict__)
110 {'default': -1000, 'x1': 100, 'x2': 200}
Tim Peters95c99e52001-09-03 01:24:30 +0000111 >>>
112"""
113
Tim Petersa427a2b2001-10-29 22:25:45 +0000114class defaultdict2(dict):
Tim Peters95c99e52001-09-03 01:24:30 +0000115 __slots__ = ['default']
116
117 def __init__(self, default=None):
Tim Petersa427a2b2001-10-29 22:25:45 +0000118 dict.__init__(self)
Tim Peters95c99e52001-09-03 01:24:30 +0000119 self.default = default
120
121 def __getitem__(self, key):
122 try:
Tim Petersa427a2b2001-10-29 22:25:45 +0000123 return dict.__getitem__(self, key)
Tim Peters95c99e52001-09-03 01:24:30 +0000124 except KeyError:
125 return self.default
126
127 def get(self, key, *args):
128 if not args:
129 args = (self.default,)
Tim Petersa427a2b2001-10-29 22:25:45 +0000130 return dict.get(self, key, *args)
Tim Peters95c99e52001-09-03 01:24:30 +0000131
132 def merge(self, other):
133 for key in other:
134 if key not in self:
135 self[key] = other[key]
136
137test_2 = """
138
139The __slots__ declaration takes a list of instance variables, and reserves
140space for exactly these in the instance. When __slots__ is used, other
141instance variables cannot be assigned to:
142
143 >>> a = defaultdict2(default=0.0)
144 >>> a[1]
145 0.0
146 >>> a.default = -1
147 >>> a[1]
148 -1
149 >>> a.x1 = 1
150 Traceback (most recent call last):
151 File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
152 AttributeError: 'defaultdict2' object has no attribute 'x1'
153 >>>
154
155"""
156
157test_3 = """
158
159Introspecting instances of built-in types
160
161For instance of built-in types, x.__class__ is now the same as type(x):
162
163 >>> type([])
164 <type 'list'>
165 >>> [].__class__
166 <type 'list'>
167 >>> list
168 <type 'list'>
169 >>> isinstance([], list)
Guido van Rossum77f6a652002-04-03 22:41:51 +0000170 True
Tim Petersa427a2b2001-10-29 22:25:45 +0000171 >>> isinstance([], dict)
Guido van Rossum77f6a652002-04-03 22:41:51 +0000172 False
Tim Peters95c99e52001-09-03 01:24:30 +0000173 >>> isinstance([], object)
Guido van Rossum77f6a652002-04-03 22:41:51 +0000174 True
Tim Peters95c99e52001-09-03 01:24:30 +0000175 >>>
176
177Under the new proposal, the __methods__ attribute no longer exists:
178
179 >>> [].__methods__
180 Traceback (most recent call last):
181 File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
182 AttributeError: 'list' object has no attribute '__methods__'
183 >>>
184
185Instead, you can get the same information from the list type:
186
187 >>> pprint.pprint(dir(list)) # like list.__dict__.keys(), but sorted
188 ['__add__',
189 '__class__',
190 '__contains__',
191 '__delattr__',
192 '__delitem__',
Guido van Rossum7b9144b2001-10-09 19:39:46 +0000193 '__delslice__',
Tim Peters80440552002-02-19 04:25:19 +0000194 '__doc__',
Tim Peters95c99e52001-09-03 01:24:30 +0000195 '__eq__',
196 '__ge__',
Guido van Rossum867a8d22001-09-21 19:29:08 +0000197 '__getattribute__',
Tim Peters95c99e52001-09-03 01:24:30 +0000198 '__getitem__',
199 '__getslice__',
200 '__gt__',
201 '__hash__',
202 '__iadd__',
203 '__imul__',
204 '__init__',
Raymond Hettinger14bd6de2002-05-31 21:40:38 +0000205 '__iter__',
Tim Peters95c99e52001-09-03 01:24:30 +0000206 '__le__',
207 '__len__',
208 '__lt__',
209 '__mul__',
210 '__ne__',
211 '__new__',
Guido van Rossum3926a632001-09-25 16:25:58 +0000212 '__reduce__',
Guido van Rossumc53f0092003-02-18 22:05:12 +0000213 '__reduce_ex__',
Tim Peters95c99e52001-09-03 01:24:30 +0000214 '__repr__',
Raymond Hettingeraf28e4b2003-11-08 12:39:53 +0000215 '__reversed__',
Tim Peters95c99e52001-09-03 01:24:30 +0000216 '__rmul__',
217 '__setattr__',
218 '__setitem__',
219 '__setslice__',
220 '__str__',
221 'append',
222 'count',
223 'extend',
224 'index',
225 'insert',
226 'pop',
227 'remove',
228 'reverse',
Raymond Hettinger64958a12003-12-17 20:43:33 +0000229 'sort']
Tim Peters95c99e52001-09-03 01:24:30 +0000230
231The new introspection API gives more information than the old one: in
232addition to the regular methods, it also shows the methods that are
233normally invoked through special notations, e.g. __iadd__ (+=), __len__
234(len), __ne__ (!=). You can invoke any method from this list directly:
235
236 >>> a = ['tic', 'tac']
237 >>> list.__len__(a) # same as len(a)
238 2
239 >>> a.__len__() # ditto
240 2
241 >>> list.append(a, 'toe') # same as a.append('toe')
242 >>> a
243 ['tic', 'tac', 'toe']
244 >>>
245
246This is just like it is for user-defined classes.
247"""
248
249test_4 = """
250
251Static methods and class methods
252
253The new introspection API makes it possible to add static methods and class
254methods. Static methods are easy to describe: they behave pretty much like
255static methods in C++ or Java. Here's an example:
256
257 >>> class C:
258 ...
259 ... def foo(x, y):
260 ... print "staticmethod", x, y
261 ... foo = staticmethod(foo)
262
263 >>> C.foo(1, 2)
264 staticmethod 1 2
265 >>> c = C()
266 >>> c.foo(1, 2)
267 staticmethod 1 2
268
269Class methods use a similar pattern to declare methods that receive an
270implicit first argument that is the *class* for which they are invoked.
271
272 >>> class C:
273 ... def foo(cls, y):
274 ... print "classmethod", cls, y
275 ... foo = classmethod(foo)
276
277 >>> C.foo(1)
Tim Peters90ba8d92001-09-09 01:21:31 +0000278 classmethod test.test_descrtut.C 1
Tim Peters95c99e52001-09-03 01:24:30 +0000279 >>> c = C()
280 >>> c.foo(1)
Tim Peters90ba8d92001-09-09 01:21:31 +0000281 classmethod test.test_descrtut.C 1
Tim Peters95c99e52001-09-03 01:24:30 +0000282
283 >>> class D(C):
284 ... pass
285
286 >>> D.foo(1)
Tim Peters90ba8d92001-09-09 01:21:31 +0000287 classmethod test.test_descrtut.D 1
Tim Peters95c99e52001-09-03 01:24:30 +0000288 >>> d = D()
289 >>> d.foo(1)
Tim Peters90ba8d92001-09-09 01:21:31 +0000290 classmethod test.test_descrtut.D 1
Tim Peters95c99e52001-09-03 01:24:30 +0000291
292This prints "classmethod __main__.D 1" both times; in other words, the
293class passed as the first argument of foo() is the class involved in the
294call, not the class involved in the definition of foo().
295
296But notice this:
297
298 >>> class E(C):
299 ... def foo(cls, y): # override C.foo
300 ... print "E.foo() called"
301 ... C.foo(y)
302 ... foo = classmethod(foo)
303
304 >>> E.foo(1)
305 E.foo() called
Tim Peters90ba8d92001-09-09 01:21:31 +0000306 classmethod test.test_descrtut.C 1
Tim Peters95c99e52001-09-03 01:24:30 +0000307 >>> e = E()
308 >>> e.foo(1)
309 E.foo() called
Tim Peters90ba8d92001-09-09 01:21:31 +0000310 classmethod test.test_descrtut.C 1
Tim Peters95c99e52001-09-03 01:24:30 +0000311
312In this example, the call to C.foo() from E.foo() will see class C as its
313first argument, not class E. This is to be expected, since the call
314specifies the class C. But it stresses the difference between these class
315methods and methods defined in metaclasses (where an upcall to a metamethod
316would pass the target class as an explicit first argument).
317"""
318
319test_5 = """
320
321Attributes defined by get/set methods
322
323
Guido van Rossum8bce4ac2001-09-06 21:56:42 +0000324 >>> class property(object):
Tim Peters95c99e52001-09-03 01:24:30 +0000325 ...
326 ... def __init__(self, get, set=None):
327 ... self.__get = get
328 ... self.__set = set
329 ...
330 ... def __get__(self, inst, type=None):
331 ... return self.__get(inst)
332 ...
333 ... def __set__(self, inst, value):
334 ... if self.__set is None:
335 ... raise AttributeError, "this attribute is read-only"
336 ... return self.__set(inst, value)
337
338Now let's define a class with an attribute x defined by a pair of methods,
339getx() and and setx():
340
341 >>> class C(object):
342 ...
343 ... def __init__(self):
344 ... self.__x = 0
345 ...
346 ... def getx(self):
347 ... return self.__x
348 ...
349 ... def setx(self, x):
350 ... if x < 0: x = 0
351 ... self.__x = x
352 ...
Guido van Rossum8bce4ac2001-09-06 21:56:42 +0000353 ... x = property(getx, setx)
Tim Peters95c99e52001-09-03 01:24:30 +0000354
355Here's a small demonstration:
356
357 >>> a = C()
358 >>> a.x = 10
359 >>> print a.x
360 10
361 >>> a.x = -10
362 >>> print a.x
363 0
364 >>>
365
Guido van Rossum8bce4ac2001-09-06 21:56:42 +0000366Hmm -- property is builtin now, so let's try it that way too.
Tim Peters95c99e52001-09-03 01:24:30 +0000367
Guido van Rossum8bce4ac2001-09-06 21:56:42 +0000368 >>> del property # unmask the builtin
369 >>> property
370 <type 'property'>
Tim Peters95c99e52001-09-03 01:24:30 +0000371
372 >>> class C(object):
373 ... def __init__(self):
374 ... self.__x = 0
375 ... def getx(self):
376 ... return self.__x
377 ... def setx(self, x):
378 ... if x < 0: x = 0
379 ... self.__x = x
Guido van Rossum8bce4ac2001-09-06 21:56:42 +0000380 ... x = property(getx, setx)
Tim Peters95c99e52001-09-03 01:24:30 +0000381
382
383 >>> a = C()
384 >>> a.x = 10
385 >>> print a.x
386 10
387 >>> a.x = -10
388 >>> print a.x
389 0
390 >>>
391"""
392
393test_6 = """
394
395Method resolution order
396
397This example is implicit in the writeup.
398
399>>> class A: # classic class
400... def save(self):
401... print "called A.save()"
402>>> class B(A):
403... pass
404>>> class C(A):
405... def save(self):
406... print "called C.save()"
407>>> class D(B, C):
408... pass
409
410>>> D().save()
411called A.save()
412
413>>> class A(object): # new class
414... def save(self):
415... print "called A.save()"
416>>> class B(A):
417... pass
418>>> class C(A):
419... def save(self):
420... print "called C.save()"
421>>> class D(B, C):
422... pass
423
424>>> D().save()
425called C.save()
426"""
427
428class A(object):
429 def m(self):
430 return "A"
431
432class B(A):
433 def m(self):
434 return "B" + super(B, self).m()
435
436class C(A):
437 def m(self):
438 return "C" + super(C, self).m()
439
440class D(C, B):
441 def m(self):
442 return "D" + super(D, self).m()
443
444
445test_7 = """
446
447Cooperative methods and "super"
448
449>>> print D().m() # "DCBA"
450DCBA
451"""
452
453test_8 = """
454
455Backwards incompatibilities
456
457>>> class A:
458... def foo(self):
459... print "called A.foo()"
460
461>>> class B(A):
462... pass
463
464>>> class C(A):
465... def foo(self):
466... B.foo(self)
467
468>>> C().foo()
469Traceback (most recent call last):
470 ...
471TypeError: unbound method foo() must be called with B instance as first argument (got C instance instead)
472
473>>> class C(A):
474... def foo(self):
475... A.foo(self)
476>>> C().foo()
477called A.foo()
478"""
479
480__test__ = {"tut1": test_1,
481 "tut2": test_2,
482 "tut3": test_3,
483 "tut4": test_4,
484 "tut5": test_5,
485 "tut6": test_6,
486 "tut7": test_7,
487 "tut8": test_8}
488
489# Magic test name that regrtest.py invokes *after* importing this module.
490# This worms around a bootstrap problem.
491# Note that doctest and regrtest both look in sys.argv for a "-v" argument,
492# so this works as expected in both ways of running regrtest.
Tim Petersa0a62222001-09-09 06:12:01 +0000493def test_main(verbose=None):
494 # Obscure: import this module as test.test_descrtut instead of as
495 # plain test_descrtut because the name of this module works its way
496 # into the doctest examples, and unless the full test.test_descrtut
497 # business is used the name can change depending on how the test is
498 # invoked.
Barry Warsaw04f357c2002-07-23 19:04:11 +0000499 from test import test_support, test_descrtut
500 test_support.run_doctest(test_descrtut, verbose)
Tim Peters95c99e52001-09-03 01:24:30 +0000501
502# This part isn't needed for regrtest, but for running the test directly.
503if __name__ == "__main__":
Tim Petersa0a62222001-09-09 06:12:01 +0000504 test_main(1)