| /* |
| * Copyright 2018 Google Inc. |
| * |
| * Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be |
| * found in the LICENSE file. |
| */ |
| |
| #include "include/core/SkRefCnt.h" |
| #include "src/core/SkTSort.h" |
| #include "tests/Test.h" |
| |
| #include "tools/ToolUtils.h" |
| |
| // A node in the graph. This corresponds to an opsTask in the MDB world. |
| class Node : public SkRefCnt { |
| public: |
| char id() const { return fID; } |
| int indexInSort() const { SkASSERT(fIndexInSort >= 0); return fIndexInSort; } |
| bool visited() const { return fVisited; } |
| |
| #ifdef SK_DEBUG |
| void print() const { |
| SkDebugf("%d: id %c", fIndexInSort, fID); |
| if (fNodesIDependOn.count()) { |
| SkDebugf(" I depend on (%d): ", fNodesIDependOn.count()); |
| for (Node* tmp : fNodesIDependOn) { |
| SkDebugf("%c, ", tmp->id()); |
| } |
| } |
| if (fNodesThatDependOnMe.count()) { |
| SkDebugf(" (%d) depend on me: ", fNodesThatDependOnMe.count()); |
| for (Node* tmp : fNodesThatDependOnMe) { |
| SkDebugf("%c, ", tmp->id()); |
| } |
| } |
| SkDebugf("\n"); |
| } |
| #endif |
| |
| void validate(skiatest::Reporter* reporter) const { |
| for (Node* dependedOn : fNodesIDependOn) { |
| REPORTER_ASSERT(reporter, dependedOn->indexInSort() < this->indexInSort()); |
| } |
| for (Node* dependent : fNodesThatDependOnMe) { |
| REPORTER_ASSERT(reporter, this->indexInSort() < dependent->indexInSort()); |
| } |
| REPORTER_ASSERT(reporter, !fVisited); // this flag should only be true w/in depEdges() |
| } |
| |
| static bool CompareIndicesGT(Node* const& a, Node* const& b) { |
| return a->indexInSort() > b->indexInSort(); |
| } |
| |
| int numDependents() const { return fNodesThatDependOnMe.count(); } |
| Node* dependent(int index) const { |
| SkASSERT(0 <= index && index < fNodesThatDependOnMe.count()); |
| return fNodesThatDependOnMe[index]; |
| } |
| |
| private: |
| friend class Graph; |
| |
| explicit Node(char id) : fID(id), fIndexInSort(-1), fVisited(false) {} |
| |
| void setIndexInSort(int indexInSort) { fIndexInSort = indexInSort; } |
| void setVisited(bool visited) { fVisited = visited; } |
| void addDependency(Node* dependedOn) { |
| fNodesIDependOn.push_back(dependedOn); |
| |
| dependedOn->addDependent(this); |
| } |
| void addDependent(Node* dependent) { |
| fNodesThatDependOnMe.push_back(dependent); |
| } |
| |
| char fID; |
| SkTDArray<Node*> fNodesIDependOn; // These nodes must appear before this one in the sort |
| SkTDArray<Node*> fNodesThatDependOnMe; // These ones must appear after this one |
| int fIndexInSort; |
| bool fVisited; // only used in addEdges() |
| }; |
| |
| // The DAG driving the incremental topological sort. This corresponds to the opsTask DAG in |
| // the MDB world. |
| class Graph { |
| public: |
| Graph(int numNodesToReserve, skiatest::Reporter* reporter) |
| : fNodes(numNodesToReserve) |
| , fReporter(reporter) { |
| } |
| |
| Node* addNode(uint32_t id) { |
| this->validate(); |
| sk_sp<Node> tmp(new Node(id)); |
| |
| fNodes.push_back(tmp); // The graph gets the creation ref |
| tmp->setIndexInSort(fNodes.count()-1); |
| this->validate(); |
| return tmp.get(); |
| } |
| |
| // 'dependedOn' must appear before 'dependent' in the sort |
| void addEdge(Node* dependedOn, Node* dependent) { |
| // TODO: this would be faster if all the SkTDArray code was stripped out of |
| // addEdges but, when used in MDB sorting, this entry point will never be used. |
| SkTDArray<Node*> tmp(&dependedOn, 1); |
| this->addEdges(&tmp, dependent); |
| } |
| |
| // All the nodes in 'dependedOn' must appear before 'dependent' in the sort. |
| // This is O(v + e + cost_of_sorting(b)) where: |
| // v: number of nodes |
| // e: number of edges |
| // b: number of new edges in 'dependedOn' |
| // |
| // The algorithm works by first finding the "affected region" that contains all the |
| // nodes whose position in the topological sort is invalidated by the addition of the new |
| // edges. It then traverses the affected region from left to right, temporarily removing |
| // invalid nodes from 'fNodes' and shifting valid nodes left to fill in the gaps. In this |
| // left to right traversal, when a node is shifted to the left the current set of invalid |
| // nodes is examined to see if any needed to be moved to the right of that node. If so, |
| // they are reintroduced to the 'fNodes' array but now in the appropriate position. The |
| // separation of the algorithm into search (the dfs method) and readjustment (the shift |
| // method) means that each node affected by the new edges is only ever moved once. |
| void addEdges(SkTDArray<Node*>* dependedOn, Node* dependent) { |
| this->validate(); |
| |
| // remove any of the new dependencies that are already satisfied |
| for (int i = 0; i < dependedOn->count(); ++i) { |
| if ((*dependedOn)[i]->indexInSort() < dependent->indexInSort()) { |
| dependent->addDependency((*dependedOn)[i]); |
| dependedOn->removeShuffle(i); |
| i--; |
| } else { |
| dependent->addDependency((*dependedOn)[i]); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| if (dependedOn->isEmpty()) { |
| return; |
| } |
| |
| // Sort the remaining dependencies into descending order based on their indices in the |
| // sort. This means that we will be proceeding from right to left in the sort when |
| // correcting the order. |
| // TODO: QSort is waaay overkill here! |
| SkTQSort<Node*>(dependedOn->begin(), dependedOn->end() - 1, Node::CompareIndicesGT); |
| |
| // TODO: although this is the general algorithm, I think this can be simplified for our |
| // use case (i.e., the same dependent for all the new edges). |
| |
| int lowerBound = fNodes.count(); // 'lowerBound' tracks the left of the affected region |
| for (int i = 0; i < dependedOn->count(); ++i) { |
| if ((*dependedOn)[i]->indexInSort() < lowerBound) { |
| this->shift(lowerBound); |
| } |
| |
| if (!dependent->visited()) { |
| this->dfs(dependent, (*dependedOn)[i]->indexInSort()); |
| } |
| |
| lowerBound = std::min(dependent->indexInSort(), lowerBound); |
| } |
| |
| this->shift(lowerBound); |
| |
| this->validate(); |
| } |
| |
| // Get the list of node ids in the current sorted order |
| void getActual(SkString* actual) const { |
| this->validate(); |
| |
| for (int i = 0; i < fNodes.count(); ++i) { |
| (*actual) += fNodes[i]->id(); |
| if (i < fNodes.count()-1) { |
| (*actual) += ','; |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| |
| #ifdef SK_DEBUG |
| void print() const { |
| SkDebugf("-------------------\n"); |
| for (int i = 0; i < fNodes.count(); ++i) { |
| if (fNodes[i]) { |
| SkDebugf("%c ", fNodes[i]->id()); |
| } else { |
| SkDebugf("0 "); |
| } |
| } |
| SkDebugf("\n"); |
| |
| for (int i = 0; i < fNodes.count(); ++i) { |
| if (fNodes[i]) { |
| fNodes[i]->print(); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| SkDebugf("Stack: "); |
| for (int i = 0; i < fStack.count(); ++i) { |
| SkDebugf("%c/%c ", fStack[i].fNode->id(), fStack[i].fDest->id()); |
| } |
| SkDebugf("\n"); |
| } |
| #endif |
| |
| private: |
| void validate() const { |
| REPORTER_ASSERT(fReporter, fStack.empty()); |
| |
| for (int i = 0; i < fNodes.count(); ++i) { |
| REPORTER_ASSERT(fReporter, fNodes[i]->indexInSort() == i); |
| |
| fNodes[i]->validate(fReporter); |
| } |
| |
| // All the nodes in the Queue had better have been marked as visited |
| for (int i = 0; i < fStack.count(); ++i) { |
| SkASSERT(fStack[i].fNode->visited()); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| // Collect the nodes that need to be moved within the affected region. All the nodes found |
| // to be in violation of the topological constraints are placed in 'fStack'. |
| void dfs(Node* node, int upperBound) { |
| node->setVisited(true); |
| |
| for (int i = 0; i < node->numDependents(); ++i) { |
| Node* dependent = node->dependent(i); |
| |
| SkASSERT(dependent->indexInSort() != upperBound); // this would be a cycle |
| |
| if (!dependent->visited() && dependent->indexInSort() < upperBound) { |
| this->dfs(dependent, upperBound); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| fStack.push_back({ sk_ref_sp(node), fNodes[upperBound].get() }); |
| } |
| |
| // Move 'node' to the index-th slot of the sort. The index-th slot should not have a current |
| // occupant. |
| void moveNodeInSort(sk_sp<Node> node, int index) { |
| SkASSERT(!fNodes[index]); |
| fNodes[index] = node; |
| node->setIndexInSort(index); |
| } |
| |
| #ifdef SK_DEBUG |
| // Does 'fStack' have 'node'? That is, was 'node' discovered to be in violation of the |
| // topological constraints? |
| bool stackContains(Node* node) { |
| for (int i = 0; i < fStack.count(); ++i) { |
| if (node == fStack[i].fNode.get()) { |
| return true; |
| } |
| } |
| return false; |
| } |
| #endif |
| |
| // The 'shift' method iterates through the affected area from left to right moving Nodes that |
| // were found to be in violation of the topological order (i.e., in 'fStack') to their correct |
| // locations and shifting the non-violating nodes left, into the holes the violating nodes left |
| // behind. |
| void shift(int index) { |
| int numRemoved = 0; |
| while (!fStack.empty()) { |
| sk_sp<Node> node = fNodes[index]; |
| |
| if (node->visited()) { |
| // This node is in 'fStack' and was found to be in violation of the topological |
| // constraints. Remove it from 'fNodes' so non-violating nodes can be shifted |
| // left. |
| SkASSERT(this->stackContains(node.get())); |
| node->setVisited(false); // reset for future use |
| fNodes[index] = nullptr; |
| numRemoved++; |
| } else { |
| // This node was found to not be in violation of any topological constraints but |
| // must be moved left to fill in for those that were. |
| SkASSERT(!this->stackContains(node.get())); |
| SkASSERT(numRemoved); // should be moving left |
| |
| this->moveNodeInSort(node, index - numRemoved); |
| fNodes[index] = nullptr; |
| } |
| |
| while (!fStack.empty() && node.get() == fStack.back().fDest) { |
| // The left to right loop has finally encountered the destination for one or more |
| // of the nodes in 'fStack'. Place them to the right of 'node' in the sort. Note |
| // that because the violating nodes were already removed from 'fNodes' there |
| // should be enough empty space for them to be placed now. |
| numRemoved--; |
| |
| this->moveNodeInSort(fStack.back().fNode, index - numRemoved); |
| |
| fStack.pop_back(); |
| } |
| |
| index++; |
| } |
| } |
| |
| SkTArray<sk_sp<Node>> fNodes; |
| |
| struct StackInfo { |
| sk_sp<Node> fNode; // This gets a ref bc, in 'shift' it will be pulled out of 'fNodes' |
| Node* fDest; |
| }; |
| |
| SkTArray<StackInfo> fStack; // only used in addEdges() |
| |
| skiatest::Reporter* fReporter; |
| }; |
| |
| // This test adds a single invalidating edge. |
| static void test_1(skiatest::Reporter* reporter) { |
| Graph g(10, reporter); |
| |
| Node* nodeQ = g.addNode('q'); |
| Node* nodeY = g.addNode('y'); |
| Node* nodeA = g.addNode('a'); |
| Node* nodeZ = g.addNode('z'); |
| Node* nodeB = g.addNode('b'); |
| /*Node* nodeC =*/ g.addNode('c'); |
| Node* nodeW = g.addNode('w'); |
| Node* nodeD = g.addNode('d'); |
| Node* nodeX = g.addNode('x'); |
| Node* nodeR = g.addNode('r'); |
| |
| // All these edge are non-invalidating |
| g.addEdge(nodeD, nodeR); |
| g.addEdge(nodeZ, nodeW); |
| g.addEdge(nodeA, nodeB); |
| g.addEdge(nodeY, nodeZ); |
| g.addEdge(nodeQ, nodeA); |
| |
| { |
| const SkString kExpectedInitialState("q,y,a,z,b,c,w,d,x,r"); |
| SkString actualInitialState; |
| g.getActual(&actualInitialState); |
| REPORTER_ASSERT(reporter, kExpectedInitialState == actualInitialState); |
| } |
| |
| // Add the invalidating edge |
| g.addEdge(nodeX, nodeY); |
| |
| { |
| const SkString kExpectedFinalState("q,a,b,c,d,x,y,z,w,r"); |
| SkString actualFinalState; |
| g.getActual(&actualFinalState); |
| REPORTER_ASSERT(reporter, kExpectedFinalState == actualFinalState); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| // This test adds two invalidating edge sequentially |
| static void test_2(skiatest::Reporter* reporter) { |
| Graph g(10, reporter); |
| |
| Node* nodeY = g.addNode('y'); |
| /*Node* nodeA =*/ g.addNode('a'); |
| Node* nodeW = g.addNode('w'); |
| /*Node* nodeB =*/ g.addNode('b'); |
| Node* nodeZ = g.addNode('z'); |
| Node* nodeU = g.addNode('u'); |
| /*Node* nodeC =*/ g.addNode('c'); |
| Node* nodeX = g.addNode('x'); |
| /*Node* nodeD =*/ g.addNode('d'); |
| Node* nodeV = g.addNode('v'); |
| |
| // All these edge are non-invalidating |
| g.addEdge(nodeU, nodeX); |
| g.addEdge(nodeW, nodeU); |
| g.addEdge(nodeW, nodeZ); |
| g.addEdge(nodeY, nodeZ); |
| |
| { |
| const SkString kExpectedInitialState("y,a,w,b,z,u,c,x,d,v"); |
| SkString actualInitialState; |
| g.getActual(&actualInitialState); |
| REPORTER_ASSERT(reporter, kExpectedInitialState == actualInitialState); |
| } |
| |
| // Add the first invalidating edge |
| g.addEdge(nodeX, nodeY); |
| |
| { |
| const SkString kExpectedFirstState("a,w,b,u,c,x,y,z,d,v"); |
| SkString actualFirstState; |
| g.getActual(&actualFirstState); |
| REPORTER_ASSERT(reporter, kExpectedFirstState == actualFirstState); |
| } |
| |
| // Add the second invalidating edge |
| g.addEdge(nodeV, nodeW); |
| |
| { |
| const SkString kExpectedSecondState("a,b,c,d,v,w,u,x,y,z"); |
| SkString actualSecondState; |
| g.getActual(&actualSecondState); |
| REPORTER_ASSERT(reporter, kExpectedSecondState == actualSecondState); |
| } |
| } |
| |
| static void test_diamond(skiatest::Reporter* reporter) { |
| Graph g(4, reporter); |
| |
| /* Create the graph (the '.' is the pointy side of the arrow): |
| * b |
| * . \ |
| * / . |
| * a d |
| * \ . |
| * . / |
| * c |
| * Possible topological orders are [a,c,b,d] and [a,b,c,d]. |
| */ |
| |
| Node* nodeD = g.addNode('d'); |
| Node* nodeC = g.addNode('c'); |
| Node* nodeB = g.addNode('b'); |
| |
| { |
| SkTDArray<Node*> dependedOn; |
| dependedOn.push_back(nodeB); |
| dependedOn.push_back(nodeC); |
| |
| g.addEdges(&dependedOn, nodeD); // nodes B and C must come before node D |
| } |
| |
| Node* nodeA = g.addNode('a'); |
| g.addEdge(nodeA, nodeB); // node A must come before node B |
| g.addEdge(nodeA, nodeC); // node A must come before node C |
| |
| const SkString kExpected0("a,c,b,d"); |
| const SkString kExpected1("a,b,c,d"); |
| SkString actual; |
| g.getActual(&actual); |
| |
| REPORTER_ASSERT(reporter, kExpected0 == actual || kExpected1 == actual); |
| } |
| |
| static void test_lopsided_binary_tree(skiatest::Reporter* reporter) { |
| Graph g(7, reporter); |
| |
| /* Create the graph (the '.' is the pointy side of the arrow): |
| * a |
| * / \ |
| * . . |
| * b c |
| * / \ |
| * . . |
| * d e |
| * / \ |
| * . . |
| * f g |
| * |
| * Possible topological order is: [a,b,c,d,e,f,g]. |
| */ |
| |
| Node* nodeG = g.addNode('g'); |
| Node* nodeF = g.addNode('f'); |
| Node* nodeE = g.addNode('e'); |
| Node* nodeD = g.addNode('d'); |
| Node* nodeC = g.addNode('c'); |
| Node* nodeB = g.addNode('b'); |
| Node* nodeA = g.addNode('a'); |
| |
| g.addEdge(nodeE, nodeG); |
| g.addEdge(nodeE, nodeF); |
| g.addEdge(nodeC, nodeE); |
| g.addEdge(nodeC, nodeD); |
| g.addEdge(nodeA, nodeC); |
| g.addEdge(nodeA, nodeB); |
| |
| const SkString kExpected("a,b,c,d,e,f,g"); |
| SkString actual; |
| g.getActual(&actual); |
| |
| REPORTER_ASSERT(reporter, kExpected == actual); |
| } |
| |
| DEF_TEST(IncrTopoSort, reporter) { |
| test_1(reporter); |
| test_2(reporter); |
| test_diamond(reporter); |
| test_lopsided_binary_tree(reporter); |
| } |