reed@android.com | d66efc2 | 2009-03-03 18:35:18 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | #include "Test.h" |
| 2 | #include "SkColorPriv.h" |
| 3 | #include "SkXfermode.h" |
| 4 | |
| 5 | // our std SkAlpha255To256 |
| 6 | static int test_srcover0(unsigned dst, unsigned alpha) { |
| 7 | return alpha + SkAlphaMul(dst, SkAlpha255To256(255 - alpha)); |
| 8 | } |
| 9 | |
| 10 | // faster hack +1 |
| 11 | static int test_srcover1(unsigned dst, unsigned alpha) { |
| 12 | return alpha + SkAlphaMul(dst, 256 - alpha); |
| 13 | } |
| 14 | |
| 15 | // slower "correct" |
| 16 | static int test_srcover2(unsigned dst, unsigned alpha) { |
| 17 | return alpha + SkMulDiv255Round(dst, 255 - alpha); |
| 18 | } |
| 19 | |
| 20 | static void test_srcover_hack(skiatest::Reporter* reporter) { |
| 21 | /* Here's the idea. Can we ensure that when we blend on top of an opaque |
| 22 | dst, that the result always stay's opaque (i.e. exactly 255)? |
| 23 | */ |
reed@android.com | 80e39a7 | 2009-04-02 16:59:40 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 24 | |
reed@android.com | d66efc2 | 2009-03-03 18:35:18 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 25 | unsigned i; |
| 26 | int opaqueCounter0 = 0; |
| 27 | int opaqueCounter1 = 0; |
| 28 | int opaqueCounter2 = 0; |
| 29 | for (i = 0; i <= 255; i++) { |
| 30 | unsigned result0 = test_srcover0(0xFF, i); |
| 31 | unsigned result1 = test_srcover1(0xFF, i); |
| 32 | unsigned result2 = test_srcover2(0xFF, i); |
| 33 | opaqueCounter0 += (result0 == 0xFF); |
| 34 | opaqueCounter1 += (result1 == 0xFF); |
| 35 | opaqueCounter2 += (result2 == 0xFF); |
| 36 | } |
| 37 | #if 0 |
| 38 | SkDebugf("---- opaque test: [%d %d %d]\n", |
| 39 | opaqueCounter0, opaqueCounter1, opaqueCounter2); |
| 40 | #endif |
| 41 | // we acknowledge that technique0 does not always return opaque |
reed@android.com | 9781ca5 | 2009-04-14 14:28:22 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 42 | REPORTER_ASSERT(reporter, opaqueCounter0 == 256); |
reed@android.com | d66efc2 | 2009-03-03 18:35:18 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 43 | REPORTER_ASSERT(reporter, opaqueCounter1 == 256); |
| 44 | REPORTER_ASSERT(reporter, opaqueCounter2 == 256); |
reed@android.com | 80e39a7 | 2009-04-02 16:59:40 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 45 | |
reed@android.com | d66efc2 | 2009-03-03 18:35:18 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 46 | // Now ensure that we never over/underflow a byte |
| 47 | for (i = 0; i <= 255; i++) { |
| 48 | for (unsigned dst = 0; dst <= 255; dst++) { |
| 49 | unsigned r0 = test_srcover0(dst, i); |
| 50 | unsigned r1 = test_srcover1(dst, i); |
| 51 | unsigned r2 = test_srcover2(dst, i); |
| 52 | unsigned max = SkMax32(dst, i); |
| 53 | // ignore the known failure |
| 54 | if (dst != 255) { |
| 55 | REPORTER_ASSERT(reporter, r0 <= 255 && r0 >= max); |
| 56 | } |
| 57 | REPORTER_ASSERT(reporter, r1 <= 255 && r1 >= max); |
| 58 | REPORTER_ASSERT(reporter, r2 <= 255 && r2 >= max); |
reed@android.com | 80e39a7 | 2009-04-02 16:59:40 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 59 | |
reed@android.com | d66efc2 | 2009-03-03 18:35:18 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 60 | #if 0 |
| 61 | // this shows where r1 (faster) differs from r2 (more exact) |
| 62 | if (r1 != r2) { |
reed@android.com | 80e39a7 | 2009-04-02 16:59:40 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 63 | SkDebugf("--- dst=%d i=%d r1=%d r2=%d exact=%g\n", |
| 64 | dst, i, r1, r2, i + dst - dst*i/255.0f); |
reed@android.com | d66efc2 | 2009-03-03 18:35:18 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 65 | } |
| 66 | #endif |
| 67 | } |
| 68 | } |
| 69 | } |
| 70 | |
| 71 | #include "TestClassDef.h" |
| 72 | DEFINE_TESTCLASS("SrcOver", SrcOverTestClass, test_srcover_hack) |