sewardj | cbe8efa | 2004-09-06 14:57:52 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | |
sewardj | 07e0962 | 2004-09-06 20:39:20 +0000 | [diff] [blame^] | 2 | #ifndef USED_AS_INCLUDE |
| 3 | |
sewardj | cbe8efa | 2004-09-06 14:57:52 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 4 | #include "../pub/libvex_basictypes.h" |
| 5 | #include <stdio.h> |
| 6 | #include <malloc.h> |
| 7 | #include <stdlib.h> |
| 8 | #include <string.h> |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | /* Test program for developing code for conversions between |
| 12 | x87 64-bit and 80-bit floats. |
| 13 | |
| 14 | 80-bit format exists only for x86/x86-64, and so the routines |
| 15 | hardwire it as little-endian. The 64-bit format (IEEE double) |
| 16 | could exist on any platform, little or big-endian and so we |
| 17 | have to take that into account. IOW, these routines have to |
| 18 | work correctly when compiled on both big- and little-endian |
| 19 | targets, but the 80-bit images only ever have to exist in |
| 20 | little-endian format. |
| 21 | */ |
| 22 | |
| 23 | static |
| 24 | UInt read_bit_array ( UChar* arr, UInt n ) |
| 25 | { |
| 26 | UChar c = arr[n >> 3]; |
| 27 | c >>= (n&7); |
| 28 | return c & 1; |
| 29 | } |
| 30 | |
| 31 | |
| 32 | static void convert_f80le_to_f64le_HW ( /*IN*/UChar* f80, /*OUT*/UChar* f64 ) |
| 33 | { |
| 34 | asm volatile ("ffree %%st(7); fldt (%0); fstpl (%1)" |
| 35 | : |
| 36 | : "r" (&f80[0]), "r" (&f64[0]) |
| 37 | : "memory" ); |
| 38 | } |
| 39 | |
| 40 | static void convert_f64le_to_f80le_HW ( /*IN*/UChar* f64, /*OUT*/UChar* f80 ) |
| 41 | { |
| 42 | asm volatile ("ffree %%st(7); fldl (%0); fstpt (%1)" |
| 43 | : |
| 44 | : "r" (&f64[0]), "r" (&f80[0]) |
| 45 | : "memory" ); |
| 46 | } |
| 47 | |
sewardj | 07e0962 | 2004-09-06 20:39:20 +0000 | [diff] [blame^] | 48 | #endif /* ndef USED_AS_INCLUDE */ |
| 49 | |
sewardj | cbe8efa | 2004-09-06 14:57:52 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 50 | /* 80 and 64-bit floating point formats: |
| 51 | |
| 52 | 80-bit: |
| 53 | |
| 54 | S 0 0-------0 zero |
| 55 | S 0 0X------X denormals |
| 56 | S 1-7FFE 1X------X normals (all normals have leading 1) |
| 57 | S 7FFF 10------0 infinity |
| 58 | S 7FFF 10X-----X snan |
| 59 | S 7FFF 11X-----X qnan |
| 60 | |
| 61 | S is the sign bit. For runs X----X, at least one of the Xs must be |
| 62 | nonzero. Exponent is 15 bits, fractional part is 63 bits, and |
| 63 | there is an explicitly represented leading 1, and a sign bit, |
| 64 | giving 80 in total. |
| 65 | |
| 66 | 64-bit avoids the confusion of an explicitly represented leading 1 |
| 67 | and so is simpler: |
| 68 | |
| 69 | S 0 0------0 zero |
| 70 | S 0 X------X denormals |
| 71 | S 1-7FE any normals |
| 72 | S 7FF 0------0 infinity |
| 73 | S 7FF 0X-----X snan |
| 74 | S 7FF 1X-----X qnan |
| 75 | |
| 76 | Exponent is 11 bits, fractional part is 52 bits, and there is a |
| 77 | sign bit, giving 64 in total. |
| 78 | */ |
| 79 | |
| 80 | |
| 81 | /* Convert a IEEE754 double (64-bit) into an x87 extended double |
| 82 | (80-bit), mimicing the hardware fairly closely. Both numbers are |
| 83 | stored little-endian. Limitations, all of which could be fixed, |
| 84 | given some level of hassle: |
| 85 | |
| 86 | * Does not handle double precision denormals. As a result, values |
| 87 | with magnitudes less than 1e-308 are flushed to zero when they |
| 88 | need not be. |
| 89 | |
| 90 | * Identity of NaNs is not preserved. |
| 91 | |
| 92 | See comments in the code for more details. |
| 93 | */ |
| 94 | static void convert_f64le_to_f80le ( /*IN*/UChar* f64, /*OUT*/UChar* f80 ) |
| 95 | { |
| 96 | Bool isInf; |
| 97 | Int bexp; |
| 98 | UChar sign; |
| 99 | |
| 100 | sign = (f64[7] >> 7) & 1; |
| 101 | bexp = (f64[7] << 4) | ((f64[6] >> 4) & 0x0F); |
| 102 | bexp &= 0x7FF; |
| 103 | |
| 104 | /* If the exponent is zero, either we have a zero or a denormal. |
| 105 | Produce a zero. This is a hack in that it forces denormals to |
| 106 | zero. Could do better. */ |
| 107 | if (bexp == 0) { |
| 108 | f80[9] = sign << 7; |
| 109 | f80[8] = f80[7] = f80[6] = f80[5] = f80[4] |
| 110 | = f80[3] = f80[2] = f80[1] = f80[0] = 0; |
| 111 | return; |
| 112 | } |
| 113 | |
| 114 | /* If the exponent is 7FF, this is either an Infinity, a SNaN or |
| 115 | QNaN, as determined by examining bits 51:0, thus: |
| 116 | 0 ... 0 Inf |
| 117 | 0X ... X SNaN |
| 118 | 1X ... X QNaN |
| 119 | where at least one of the Xs is not zero. |
| 120 | */ |
| 121 | if (bexp == 0x7FF) { |
| 122 | isInf = (f64[6] & 0x0F) == 0 |
| 123 | && f64[5] == 0 && f64[4] == 0 && f64[3] == 0 |
| 124 | && f64[2] == 0 && f64[1] == 0 && f64[0] == 0; |
| 125 | if (isInf) { |
| 126 | /* Produce an appropriately signed infinity: |
| 127 | S 1--1 (15) 1 0--0 (63) |
| 128 | */ |
| 129 | f80[9] = (sign << 7) | 0x7F; |
| 130 | f80[8] = 0xFF; |
| 131 | f80[7] = 0x80; |
| 132 | f80[6] = f80[5] = f80[4] = f80[3] |
| 133 | = f80[2] = f80[1] = f80[0] = 0; |
| 134 | return; |
| 135 | } |
| 136 | /* So it's either a QNaN or SNaN. Distinguish by considering |
| 137 | bit 51. Note, this destroys all the trailing bits |
| 138 | (identity?) of the NaN. IEEE754 doesn't require preserving |
| 139 | these (it only requires that there be one QNaN value and one |
| 140 | SNaN value), but x87 does seem to have some ability to |
| 141 | preserve them. Anyway, here, the NaN's identity is |
| 142 | destroyed. Could be improved. */ |
| 143 | if (f64[6] & 8) { |
| 144 | /* QNaN. Make a QNaN: |
| 145 | S 1--1 (15) 1 1--1 (63) |
| 146 | */ |
| 147 | f80[9] = (sign << 7) | 0x7F; |
| 148 | f80[8] = 0xFF; |
| 149 | f80[7] = 0xFF; |
| 150 | f80[6] = f80[5] = f80[4] = f80[3] |
| 151 | = f80[2] = f80[1] = f80[0] = 0xFF; |
| 152 | } else { |
| 153 | /* SNaN. Make a SNaN: |
| 154 | S 1--1 (15) 0 1--1 (63) |
| 155 | */ |
| 156 | f80[9] = (sign << 7) | 0x7F; |
| 157 | f80[8] = 0xFF; |
| 158 | f80[7] = 0x7F; |
| 159 | f80[6] = f80[5] = f80[4] = f80[3] |
| 160 | = f80[2] = f80[1] = f80[0] = 0xFF; |
| 161 | } |
| 162 | return; |
| 163 | } |
| 164 | |
| 165 | /* It's not a zero, denormal, infinity or nan. So it must be a |
| 166 | normalised number. Rebias the exponent and build the new |
| 167 | number. */ |
| 168 | bexp += (16383 - 1023); |
| 169 | |
| 170 | f80[9] = (sign << 7) | ((bexp >> 8) & 0xFF); |
| 171 | f80[8] = bexp & 0xFF; |
| 172 | f80[7] = (1 << 7) | ((f64[6] << 3) & 0x78) | ((f64[5] >> 5) & 7); |
| 173 | f80[6] = ((f64[5] << 3) & 0xF8) | ((f64[4] >> 5) & 7); |
| 174 | f80[5] = ((f64[4] << 3) & 0xF8) | ((f64[3] >> 5) & 7); |
| 175 | f80[4] = ((f64[3] << 3) & 0xF8) | ((f64[2] >> 5) & 7); |
| 176 | f80[3] = ((f64[2] << 3) & 0xF8) | ((f64[1] >> 5) & 7); |
| 177 | f80[2] = ((f64[1] << 3) & 0xF8) | ((f64[0] >> 5) & 7); |
| 178 | f80[1] = ((f64[0] << 3) & 0xF8); |
| 179 | f80[0] = 0; |
| 180 | } |
| 181 | |
| 182 | |
| 183 | ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// |
| 184 | |
| 185 | /* Convert a x87 extended double (80-bit) into an IEEE 754 double |
| 186 | (64-bit), mimicing the hardware fairly closely. Both numbers are |
| 187 | stored little-endian. Limitations, all of which could be fixed, |
| 188 | given some level of hassle: |
| 189 | |
| 190 | * Does not create double precision denormals. As a result, values |
| 191 | with magnitudes less than 1e-308 are flushed to zero when they |
| 192 | need not be. |
| 193 | |
| 194 | * Rounding following truncation could be a bit better. |
| 195 | |
| 196 | * Identity of NaNs is not preserved. |
| 197 | |
| 198 | See comments in the code for more details. |
| 199 | */ |
| 200 | static void convert_f80le_to_f64le ( /*IN*/UChar* f80, /*OUT*/UChar* f64 ) |
| 201 | { |
| 202 | Bool isInf; |
| 203 | Int bexp; |
| 204 | UChar sign; |
| 205 | |
| 206 | sign = (f80[9] >> 7) & 1; |
| 207 | bexp = (((UInt)f80[9]) << 8) | (UInt)f80[8]; |
| 208 | bexp &= 0x7FFF; |
| 209 | |
| 210 | /* If the exponent is zero, either we have a zero or a denormal. |
| 211 | But an extended precision denormal becomes a double precision |
| 212 | zero, so in either case, just produce the appropriately signed |
| 213 | zero. */ |
| 214 | if (bexp == 0) { |
| 215 | f64[7] = sign << 7; |
| 216 | f64[6] = f64[5] = f64[4] = f64[3] = f64[2] = f64[1] = f64[0] = 0; |
| 217 | return; |
| 218 | } |
| 219 | |
| 220 | /* If the exponent is 7FFF, this is either an Infinity, a SNaN or |
| 221 | QNaN, as determined by examining bits 62:0, thus: |
| 222 | 0 ... 0 Inf |
| 223 | 0X ... X SNaN |
| 224 | 1X ... X QNaN |
| 225 | where at least one of the Xs is not zero. |
| 226 | */ |
| 227 | if (bexp == 0x7FFF) { |
| 228 | isInf = (f80[7] & 0x7F) == 0 |
| 229 | && f80[6] == 0 && f80[5] == 0 && f80[4] == 0 |
| 230 | && f80[3] == 0 && f80[2] == 0 && f80[1] == 0 && f80[0] == 0; |
| 231 | if (isInf) { |
| 232 | if (0 == (f80[7] & 0x80)) |
| 233 | goto wierd_NaN; |
| 234 | /* Produce an appropriately signed infinity: |
| 235 | S 1--1 (11) 0--0 (52) |
| 236 | */ |
| 237 | f64[7] = (sign << 7) | 0x7F; |
| 238 | f64[6] = 0xF0; |
| 239 | f64[5] = f64[4] = f64[3] = f64[2] = f64[1] = f64[0] = 0; |
| 240 | return; |
| 241 | } |
| 242 | /* So it's either a QNaN or SNaN. Distinguish by considering |
| 243 | bit 62. Note, this destroys all the trailing bits |
| 244 | (identity?) of the NaN. IEEE754 doesn't require preserving |
| 245 | these (it only requires that there be one QNaN value and one |
| 246 | SNaN value), but x87 does seem to have some ability to |
| 247 | preserve them. Anyway, here, the NaN's identity is |
| 248 | destroyed. Could be improved. */ |
| 249 | if (f80[8] & 0x40) { |
| 250 | /* QNaN. Make a QNaN: |
| 251 | S 1--1 (11) 1 1--1 (51) |
| 252 | */ |
| 253 | f64[7] = (sign << 7) | 0x7F; |
| 254 | f64[6] = 0xFF; |
| 255 | f64[5] = f64[4] = f64[3] = f64[2] = f64[1] = f64[0] = 0xFF; |
| 256 | } else { |
| 257 | /* SNaN. Make a SNaN: |
| 258 | S 1--1 (11) 0 1--1 (51) |
| 259 | */ |
| 260 | f64[7] = (sign << 7) | 0x7F; |
| 261 | f64[6] = 0xF7; |
| 262 | f64[5] = f64[4] = f64[3] = f64[2] = f64[1] = f64[0] = 0xFF; |
| 263 | } |
| 264 | return; |
| 265 | } |
| 266 | |
| 267 | /* If it's not a Zero, NaN or Inf, and the integer part (bit 62) is |
| 268 | zero, the x87 FPU appears to consider the number denormalised |
| 269 | and converts it to a QNaN. */ |
| 270 | if (0 == (f80[7] & 0x80)) { |
| 271 | wierd_NaN: |
| 272 | /* Strange hardware QNaN: |
| 273 | S 1--1 (11) 1 0--0 (51) |
| 274 | */ |
| 275 | /* On a PIII, these QNaNs always appear with sign==1. I have |
| 276 | no idea why. */ |
| 277 | f64[7] = (1 /*sign*/ << 7) | 0x7F; |
| 278 | f64[6] = 0xF8; |
| 279 | f64[5] = f64[4] = f64[3] = f64[2] = f64[1] = f64[0] = 0; |
| 280 | return; |
| 281 | } |
| 282 | |
| 283 | /* It's not a zero, denormal, infinity or nan. So it must be a |
| 284 | normalised number. Rebias the exponent and consider. */ |
| 285 | bexp -= (16383 - 1023); |
| 286 | if (bexp >= 0x7FF) { |
| 287 | /* It's too big for a double. Construct an infinity. */ |
| 288 | f64[7] = (sign << 7) | 0x7F; |
| 289 | f64[6] = 0xF0; |
| 290 | f64[5] = f64[4] = f64[3] = f64[2] = f64[1] = f64[0] = 0; |
| 291 | return; |
| 292 | } |
| 293 | |
| 294 | if (bexp < 0) { |
| 295 | /* It's too small for a double. Construct a zero. Note, this |
| 296 | is a kludge since we could conceivably create a |
| 297 | denormalised number for bexp in -1 to -51, but we don't |
| 298 | bother. This means the conversion flushes values |
| 299 | approximately in the range 1e-309 to 1e-324 ish to zero |
| 300 | when it doesn't actually need to. This could be |
| 301 | improved. */ |
| 302 | f64[7] = sign << 7; |
| 303 | f64[6] = f64[5] = f64[4] = f64[3] = f64[2] = f64[1] = f64[0] = 0; |
| 304 | return; |
| 305 | } |
| 306 | |
| 307 | /* Ok, it's a normalised number which is representable as a double. |
| 308 | Copy the exponent and mantissa into place. */ |
| 309 | /* |
| 310 | for (i = 0; i < 52; i++) |
| 311 | write_bit_array ( f64, |
| 312 | i, |
| 313 | read_bit_array ( f80, i+11 ) ); |
| 314 | */ |
| 315 | f64[0] = (f80[1] >> 3) | (f80[2] << 5); |
| 316 | f64[1] = (f80[2] >> 3) | (f80[3] << 5); |
| 317 | f64[2] = (f80[3] >> 3) | (f80[4] << 5); |
| 318 | f64[3] = (f80[4] >> 3) | (f80[5] << 5); |
| 319 | f64[4] = (f80[5] >> 3) | (f80[6] << 5); |
| 320 | f64[5] = (f80[6] >> 3) | (f80[7] << 5); |
| 321 | |
| 322 | f64[6] = ((bexp << 4) & 0xF0) | ((f80[7] >> 3) & 0x0F); |
| 323 | |
| 324 | f64[7] = (sign << 7) | ((bexp >> 4) & 0x7F); |
| 325 | |
| 326 | /* Now consider any rounding that needs to happen as a result of |
| 327 | truncating the mantissa. */ |
| 328 | if (f80[1] & 4) /* read_bit_array(f80, 10) == 1) */ { |
| 329 | /* Round upwards. This is a kludge. Once in every 64k |
| 330 | roundings (statistically) the bottom two bytes are both 0xFF |
| 331 | and so we don't round at all. Could be improved. */ |
| 332 | if (f64[0] != 0xFF) { |
| 333 | f64[0]++; |
| 334 | } |
| 335 | else |
| 336 | if (f64[0] == 0xFF && f64[1] != 0xFF) { |
| 337 | f64[0] = 0; |
| 338 | f64[1]++; |
| 339 | } |
| 340 | /* else we don't round, but we should. */ |
| 341 | } |
| 342 | } |
| 343 | |
sewardj | 07e0962 | 2004-09-06 20:39:20 +0000 | [diff] [blame^] | 344 | #ifndef USED_AS_INCLUDE |
sewardj | cbe8efa | 2004-09-06 14:57:52 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 345 | |
| 346 | ////////////// |
| 347 | |
| 348 | static void show_f80 ( UChar* f80 ) |
| 349 | { |
| 350 | Int i; |
| 351 | printf("%d ", read_bit_array(f80, 79)); |
| 352 | |
| 353 | for (i = 78; i >= 64; i--) |
| 354 | printf("%d", read_bit_array(f80, i)); |
| 355 | |
| 356 | printf(" %d ", read_bit_array(f80, 63)); |
| 357 | |
| 358 | for (i = 62; i >= 0; i--) |
| 359 | printf("%d", read_bit_array(f80, i)); |
| 360 | } |
| 361 | |
| 362 | static void show_f64le ( UChar* f64 ) |
| 363 | { |
| 364 | Int i; |
| 365 | printf("%d ", read_bit_array(f64, 63)); |
| 366 | |
| 367 | for (i = 62; i >= 52; i--) |
| 368 | printf("%d", read_bit_array(f64, i)); |
| 369 | |
| 370 | printf(" "); |
| 371 | for (i = 51; i >= 0; i--) |
| 372 | printf("%d", read_bit_array(f64, i)); |
| 373 | } |
| 374 | |
| 375 | ////////////// |
| 376 | |
| 377 | |
| 378 | /* Convert f80 to a 64-bit IEEE double using both the hardware and the |
| 379 | soft version, and compare the results. If they differ, print |
| 380 | details and return 1. If they are identical, return 0. |
| 381 | */ |
| 382 | int do_80_to_64_test ( Int test_no, UChar* f80, UChar* f64h, UChar* f64s) |
| 383 | { |
| 384 | Char buf64s[100], buf64h[100]; |
| 385 | Bool same; |
| 386 | Int k; |
| 387 | convert_f80le_to_f64le_HW(f80, f64h); |
| 388 | convert_f80le_to_f64le(f80, f64s); |
| 389 | same = True; |
| 390 | for (k = 0; k < 8; k++) { |
| 391 | if (f64s[k] != f64h[k]) { |
| 392 | same = False; break; |
| 393 | } |
| 394 | } |
| 395 | /* bitwise identical */ |
| 396 | if (same) |
| 397 | return 0; |
| 398 | |
| 399 | sprintf(buf64s, "%.16e", *(double*)f64s); |
| 400 | sprintf(buf64h, "%.16e", *(double*)f64h); |
| 401 | |
| 402 | /* Not bitwise identical, but pretty darn close */ |
| 403 | if (0 == strcmp(buf64s, buf64h)) |
| 404 | return 0; |
| 405 | |
| 406 | printf("\n"); |
| 407 | printf("f80: "); show_f80(f80); printf("\n"); |
| 408 | printf("f64h: "); show_f64le(f64h); printf("\n"); |
| 409 | printf("f64s: "); show_f64le(f64s); printf("\n"); |
| 410 | |
| 411 | printf("[test %d] %.16Le -> (hw %s, sw %s)\n", |
| 412 | test_no, *(long double*)f80, |
| 413 | buf64h, buf64s ); |
| 414 | |
| 415 | return 1; |
| 416 | } |
| 417 | |
| 418 | |
| 419 | /* Convert an IEEE 64-bit double to a x87 extended double (80 bit) |
| 420 | using both the hardware and the soft version, and compare the |
| 421 | results. If they differ, print details and return 1. If they are |
| 422 | identical, return 0. |
| 423 | */ |
| 424 | int do_64_to_80_test ( Int test_no, UChar* f64, UChar* f80h, UChar* f80s) |
| 425 | { |
| 426 | Char buf80s[100], buf80h[100]; |
| 427 | Bool same; |
| 428 | Int k; |
| 429 | convert_f64le_to_f80le_HW(f64, f80h); |
| 430 | convert_f64le_to_f80le(f64, f80s); |
| 431 | same = True; |
| 432 | for (k = 0; k < 10; k++) { |
| 433 | if (f80s[k] != f80h[k]) { |
| 434 | same = False; break; |
| 435 | } |
| 436 | } |
| 437 | /* bitwise identical */ |
| 438 | if (same) |
| 439 | return 0; |
| 440 | |
| 441 | sprintf(buf80s, "%.20Le", *(long double*)f80s); |
| 442 | sprintf(buf80h, "%.20Le", *(long double*)f80h); |
| 443 | |
| 444 | /* Not bitwise identical, but pretty darn close */ |
| 445 | if (0 == strcmp(buf80s, buf80h)) |
| 446 | return 0; |
| 447 | |
| 448 | printf("\n"); |
| 449 | printf("f64: "); show_f64le(f64); printf("\n"); |
| 450 | printf("f80h: "); show_f80(f80h); printf("\n"); |
| 451 | printf("f80s: "); show_f80(f80s); printf("\n"); |
| 452 | |
| 453 | printf("[test %d] %.16e -> (hw %s, sw %s)\n", |
| 454 | test_no, *(double*)f64, |
| 455 | buf80h, buf80s ); |
| 456 | |
| 457 | return 1; |
| 458 | } |
| 459 | |
| 460 | |
| 461 | |
| 462 | void do_80_to_64_tests ( void ) |
| 463 | { |
| 464 | UInt b9,b8,b7,i, j; |
| 465 | Int fails=0, tests=0; |
| 466 | UChar* f64h = malloc(8); |
| 467 | UChar* f64s = malloc(8); |
| 468 | UChar* f80 = malloc(10); |
| 469 | int STEP = 1; |
| 470 | |
| 471 | srandom(4343); |
| 472 | |
| 473 | /* Ten million random bit patterns */ |
| 474 | for (i = 0; i < 10000000; i++) { |
| 475 | tests++; |
| 476 | for (j = 0; j < 10; j++) |
| 477 | f80[j] = (random() >> 7) & 255; |
| 478 | |
| 479 | fails += do_80_to_64_test(tests, f80, f64h, f64s); |
| 480 | } |
| 481 | |
| 482 | /* 2^24 numbers in which the first 24 bits are tested exhaustively |
| 483 | -- this covers the sign, exponent and leading part of the |
| 484 | mantissa. */ |
| 485 | for (b9 = 0; b9 < 256; b9 += STEP) { |
| 486 | for (b8 = 0; b8 < 256; b8 += STEP) { |
| 487 | for (b7 = 0; b7 < 256; b7 += STEP) { |
| 488 | tests++; |
| 489 | for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) |
| 490 | f80[i] = 0; |
| 491 | for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) |
| 492 | f64h[i] = f64s[i] = 0; |
| 493 | f80[9] = b9; |
| 494 | f80[8] = b8; |
| 495 | f80[7] = b7; |
| 496 | |
| 497 | fails += do_80_to_64_test(tests, f80, f64h, f64s); |
| 498 | }}} |
| 499 | |
| 500 | printf("\n80 -> 64: %d tests, %d fails\n\n", tests, fails); |
| 501 | } |
| 502 | |
| 503 | |
| 504 | void do_64_to_80_tests ( void ) |
| 505 | { |
| 506 | UInt b7,b6,b5,i, j; |
| 507 | Int fails=0, tests=0; |
| 508 | UChar* f80h = malloc(10); |
| 509 | UChar* f80s = malloc(10); |
| 510 | UChar* f64 = malloc(8); |
| 511 | int STEP = 1; |
| 512 | |
| 513 | srandom(2323); |
| 514 | |
| 515 | /* Ten million random bit patterns */ |
| 516 | for (i = 0; i < 10000000; i++) { |
| 517 | tests++; |
| 518 | for (j = 0; j < 8; j++) |
| 519 | f64[j] = (random() >> 13) & 255; |
| 520 | |
| 521 | fails += do_64_to_80_test(tests, f64, f80h, f80s); |
| 522 | } |
| 523 | |
| 524 | /* 2^24 numbers in which the first 24 bits are tested exhaustively |
| 525 | -- this covers the sign, exponent and leading part of the |
| 526 | mantissa. */ |
| 527 | for (b7 = 0; b7 < 256; b7 += STEP) { |
| 528 | for (b6 = 0; b6 < 256; b6 += STEP) { |
| 529 | for (b5 = 0; b5 < 256; b5 += STEP) { |
| 530 | tests++; |
| 531 | for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) |
| 532 | f64[i] = 0; |
| 533 | for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) |
| 534 | f80h[i] = f80s[i] = 0; |
| 535 | f64[7] = b7; |
| 536 | f64[6] = b6; |
| 537 | f64[5] = b5; |
| 538 | |
| 539 | fails += do_64_to_80_test(tests, f64, f80h, f80s); |
| 540 | }}} |
| 541 | |
| 542 | printf("\n64 -> 80: %d tests, %d fails\n\n", tests, fails); |
| 543 | } |
| 544 | |
| 545 | |
| 546 | int main ( void ) |
| 547 | { |
| 548 | do_80_to_64_tests(); |
| 549 | do_64_to_80_tests(); |
| 550 | return 0; |
| 551 | } |
| 552 | |
sewardj | 07e0962 | 2004-09-06 20:39:20 +0000 | [diff] [blame^] | 553 | #endif /* ndef USED_AS_INCLUDE */ |