| philippe | a22f59d | 2012-01-26 23:13:52 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | relaying data between gdb and process .... |
| 2 | vgdb-error value changed from 0 to 999999 |
| 3 | Breakpoint 1 at 0x........: file leak-tree.c, line 42. |
| 4 | Breakpoint 2 at 0x........: file leak-tree.c, line 67. |
| 5 | Continuing. |
| 6 | Breakpoint 1, f () at leak-tree.c:42 |
| 7 | 42 t->l = mk(); // B |
| 8 | Continuing. |
| 9 | Breakpoint 2, main () at leak-tree.c:67 |
| 10 | 67 PRINT_LEAK_COUNTS(stderr); |
| 11 | Searching for pointers to 0x........ |
| 12 | *0x........ points at 0x........ |
| 13 | Address 0x........ is 0 bytes inside data symbol "t" |
| 14 | full leak search |
| 15 | 16 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record ... of ... |
| 16 | at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...) |
| 17 | by 0x........: mk (leak-tree.c:28) |
| 18 | by 0x........: f (leak-tree.c:41) |
| 19 | by 0x........: main (leak-tree.c:63) |
| 20 | 16 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record ... of ... |
| 21 | at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...) |
| 22 | by 0x........: mk (leak-tree.c:28) |
| 23 | by 0x........: f (leak-tree.c:42) |
| 24 | by 0x........: main (leak-tree.c:63) |
| 25 | 16 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record ... of ... |
| 26 | at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...) |
| 27 | by 0x........: mk (leak-tree.c:28) |
| 28 | by 0x........: f (leak-tree.c:45) |
| 29 | by 0x........: main (leak-tree.c:63) |
| 30 | 16 bytes in 1 blocks are indirectly lost in loss record ... of ... |
| 31 | at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...) |
| 32 | by 0x........: mk (leak-tree.c:28) |
| 33 | by 0x........: f (leak-tree.c:46) |
| 34 | by 0x........: main (leak-tree.c:63) |
| 35 | 16 bytes in 1 blocks are indirectly lost in loss record ... of ... |
| 36 | at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...) |
| 37 | by 0x........: mk (leak-tree.c:28) |
| 38 | by 0x........: f (leak-tree.c:47) |
| 39 | by 0x........: main (leak-tree.c:63) |
| 40 | 16 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ... |
| 41 | at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...) |
| 42 | by 0x........: mk (leak-tree.c:28) |
| 43 | by 0x........: f (leak-tree.c:44) |
| 44 | by 0x........: main (leak-tree.c:63) |
| 45 | 48 (16 direct, 32 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ... |
| 46 | at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...) |
| 47 | by 0x........: mk (leak-tree.c:28) |
| 48 | by 0x........: f (leak-tree.c:43) |
| 49 | by 0x........: main (leak-tree.c:63) |
| 50 | block list 6 D |
| 51 | 16 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ... |
| 52 | at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...) |
| 53 | by 0x........: mk (leak-tree.c:28) |
| 54 | by 0x........: f (leak-tree.c:44) |
| 55 | by 0x........: main (leak-tree.c:63) |
| 56 | 0x........[16] |
| 57 | block list 7 C F G |
| 58 | 48 (16 direct, 32 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record ... of ... |
| 59 | at 0x........: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:...) |
| 60 | by 0x........: mk (leak-tree.c:28) |
| 61 | by 0x........: f (leak-tree.c:43) |
| 62 | by 0x........: main (leak-tree.c:63) |
| 63 | 0x........[16] |
| 64 | 0x........[16] indirect loss record 4 |
| 65 | 0x........[16] indirect loss record 5 |
| 66 | monitor command request to kill this process |
| 67 | Remote connection closed |