Gitiles
Code Review Sign In
gerrit-public.fairphone.software / platform / external / valgrind / refs/tags/21.01.0-rel.0 / . / helgrind / tests / tc09_bad_unlock.stderr.exp
blob: a18450b9a89ae5836ba5a724b38d9d81853566ff [file] [log] [blame]
sewardjb4112022007-11-09 22:49:28 +0000[diff] [blame]1
sewardje723d422011-06-24 12:55:25 +0000[diff] [blame]2---Thread-Announcement------------------------------------------
3
sewardj575e48f2008-12-18 20:21:13 +0000[diff] [blame]4Thread #x is the program's root thread
sewardjb4112022007-11-09 22:49:28 +0000[diff] [blame]5
sewardje723d422011-06-24 12:55:25 +0000[diff] [blame]6----------------------------------------------------------------
7
sewardj24118492009-07-15 14:50:02 +0000[diff] [blame]8Thread #x unlocked a not-locked lock at 0x........
sewardj8eb8bab2015-07-21 14:44:28 +0000[diff] [blame]9 at 0x........: mutex_unlock_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
10 by 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
sewardjb4112022007-11-09 22:49:28 +0000[diff] [blame]11 by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:27)
12 by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
philippe46daf0d2014-07-29 20:08:15 +0000[diff] [blame]13 Lock at 0x........ was first observed
sewardjb4112022007-11-09 22:49:28 +0000[diff] [blame]14 at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
15 by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:23)
16 by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
philippe46daf0d2014-07-29 20:08:15 +0000[diff] [blame]17 Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
18 in frame #x, created by nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:16)
19
sewardjb4112022007-11-09 22:49:28 +0000[diff] [blame]20
sewardje723d422011-06-24 12:55:25 +0000[diff] [blame]21---Thread-Announcement------------------------------------------
22
sewardj575e48f2008-12-18 20:21:13 +0000[diff] [blame]23Thread #x was created
njn553c42f2009-03-13 01:41:03 +0000[diff] [blame]24 ...
sewardjb4112022007-11-09 22:49:28 +0000[diff] [blame]25 by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
26 by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:35)
27 by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
28
sewardje723d422011-06-24 12:55:25 +0000[diff] [blame]29----------------------------------------------------------------
30
sewardj575e48f2008-12-18 20:21:13 +0000[diff] [blame]31Thread #x unlocked lock at 0x........ currently held by thread #x
sewardj8eb8bab2015-07-21 14:44:28 +0000[diff] [blame]32 at 0x........: mutex_unlock_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
33 by 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
sewardjb4112022007-11-09 22:49:28 +0000[diff] [blame]34 by 0x........: child_fn (tc09_bad_unlock.c:11)
35 by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
njn553c42f2009-03-13 01:41:03 +0000[diff] [blame]36 ...
philippe46daf0d2014-07-29 20:08:15 +0000[diff] [blame]37 Lock at 0x........ was first observed
sewardjb4112022007-11-09 22:49:28 +0000[diff] [blame]38 at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
39 by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
40 by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
philippe46daf0d2014-07-29 20:08:15 +0000[diff] [blame]41 Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
42 in frame #x, created by nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:16)
43
sewardjb4112022007-11-09 22:49:28 +0000[diff] [blame]44
sewardje723d422011-06-24 12:55:25 +0000[diff] [blame]45----------------------------------------------------------------
46
sewardj24118492009-07-15 14:50:02 +0000[diff] [blame]47Thread #x unlocked an invalid lock at 0x........
sewardj8eb8bab2015-07-21 14:44:28 +0000[diff] [blame]48 at 0x........: mutex_unlock_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
49 by 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
sewardjb4112022007-11-09 22:49:28 +0000[diff] [blame]50 by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
51 by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
52
sewardje723d422011-06-24 12:55:25 +0000[diff] [blame]53----------------------------------------------------------------
54
sewardj575e48f2008-12-18 20:21:13 +0000[diff] [blame]55Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed
sewardjb4112022007-11-09 22:49:28 +0000[diff] [blame]56 with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
sewardj8eb8bab2015-07-21 14:44:28 +0000[diff] [blame]57 at 0x........: mutex_unlock_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
58 by 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
sewardjb4112022007-11-09 22:49:28 +0000[diff] [blame]59 by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
60 by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
sewardjb4112022007-11-09 22:49:28 +0000[diff] [blame]61
njncab64bc2009-08-12 00:14:44 +0000[diff] [blame]62---------------------
sewardje723d422011-06-24 12:55:25 +0000[diff] [blame]63----------------------------------------------------------------
64
sewardj24118492009-07-15 14:50:02 +0000[diff] [blame]65Thread #x unlocked a not-locked lock at 0x........
sewardj8eb8bab2015-07-21 14:44:28 +0000[diff] [blame]66 at 0x........: mutex_unlock_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
67 by 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
sewardjb4112022007-11-09 22:49:28 +0000[diff] [blame]68 by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:27)
69 by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
philippe46daf0d2014-07-29 20:08:15 +0000[diff] [blame]70 Lock at 0x........ was first observed
sewardjb4112022007-11-09 22:49:28 +0000[diff] [blame]71 at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
72 by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:23)
sewardjab195152008-11-10 00:16:34 +0000[diff] [blame]73 by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
philippe46daf0d2014-07-29 20:08:15 +0000[diff] [blame]74 Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
75 in frame #x, created by nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:16)
76
sewardjab195152008-11-10 00:16:34 +0000[diff] [blame]77
sewardje723d422011-06-24 12:55:25 +0000[diff] [blame]78----------------------------------------------------------------
79
sewardj575e48f2008-12-18 20:21:13 +0000[diff] [blame]80Thread #x: Attempt to re-lock a non-recursive lock I already hold
sewardj8eb8bab2015-07-21 14:44:28 +0000[diff] [blame]81 at 0x........: mutex_lock_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
82 by 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
sewardjab195152008-11-10 00:16:34 +0000[diff] [blame]83 by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
84 by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
sewardj56e256a2010-10-14 10:45:20 +0000[diff] [blame]85 Lock was previously acquired
sewardj8eb8bab2015-07-21 14:44:28 +0000[diff] [blame]86 at 0x........: mutex_lock_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
87 by 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
sewardj56e256a2010-10-14 10:45:20 +0000[diff] [blame]88 by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
89 by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
sewardjab195152008-11-10 00:16:34 +0000[diff] [blame]90
sewardje723d422011-06-24 12:55:25 +0000[diff] [blame]91----------------------------------------------------------------
92
sewardj575e48f2008-12-18 20:21:13 +0000[diff] [blame]93Thread #x: Bug in libpthread: recursive write lock granted on mutex/wrlock which does not support recursion
sewardj8eb8bab2015-07-21 14:44:28 +0000[diff] [blame]94 at 0x........: mutex_lock_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
95 by 0x........: pthread_mutex_lock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
sewardjab195152008-11-10 00:16:34 +0000[diff] [blame]96 by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:32)
sewardjb4112022007-11-09 22:49:28 +0000[diff] [blame]97 by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
98
sewardje723d422011-06-24 12:55:25 +0000[diff] [blame]99---Thread-Announcement------------------------------------------
100
sewardj575e48f2008-12-18 20:21:13 +0000[diff] [blame]101Thread #x was created
njn553c42f2009-03-13 01:41:03 +0000[diff] [blame]102 ...
sewardjb4112022007-11-09 22:49:28 +0000[diff] [blame]103 by 0x........: pthread_create@* (hg_intercepts.c:...)
104 by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:35)
105 by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
106
sewardje723d422011-06-24 12:55:25 +0000[diff] [blame]107----------------------------------------------------------------
108
sewardj575e48f2008-12-18 20:21:13 +0000[diff] [blame]109Thread #x unlocked lock at 0x........ currently held by thread #x
sewardj8eb8bab2015-07-21 14:44:28 +0000[diff] [blame]110 at 0x........: mutex_unlock_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
111 by 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
sewardjb4112022007-11-09 22:49:28 +0000[diff] [blame]112 by 0x........: child_fn (tc09_bad_unlock.c:11)
113 by 0x........: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:...)
njn553c42f2009-03-13 01:41:03 +0000[diff] [blame]114 ...
philippe46daf0d2014-07-29 20:08:15 +0000[diff] [blame]115 Lock at 0x........ was first observed
sewardjb4112022007-11-09 22:49:28 +0000[diff] [blame]116 at 0x........: pthread_mutex_init (hg_intercepts.c:...)
117 by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:31)
sewardjab195152008-11-10 00:16:34 +0000[diff] [blame]118 by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:49)
philippe46daf0d2014-07-29 20:08:15 +0000[diff] [blame]119 Address 0x........ is on thread #x's stack
120 in frame #x, created by nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:16)
121
sewardjb4112022007-11-09 22:49:28 +0000[diff] [blame]122
sewardje723d422011-06-24 12:55:25 +0000[diff] [blame]123----------------------------------------------------------------
124
sewardj24118492009-07-15 14:50:02 +0000[diff] [blame]125Thread #x unlocked an invalid lock at 0x........
sewardj8eb8bab2015-07-21 14:44:28 +0000[diff] [blame]126 at 0x........: mutex_unlock_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
127 by 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
sewardjb4112022007-11-09 22:49:28 +0000[diff] [blame]128 by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
129 by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
130
sewardje723d422011-06-24 12:55:25 +0000[diff] [blame]131----------------------------------------------------------------
132
sewardj575e48f2008-12-18 20:21:13 +0000[diff] [blame]133Thread #x's call to pthread_mutex_unlock failed
sewardjb4112022007-11-09 22:49:28 +0000[diff] [blame]134 with error code 22 (EINVAL: Invalid argument)
sewardj8eb8bab2015-07-21 14:44:28 +0000[diff] [blame]135 at 0x........: mutex_unlock_WRK (hg_intercepts.c:...)
136 by 0x........: pthread_mutex_unlock (hg_intercepts.c:...)
sewardjb4112022007-11-09 22:49:28 +0000[diff] [blame]137 by 0x........: nearly_main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:41)
138 by 0x........: main (tc09_bad_unlock.c:50)
139
sewardje723d422011-06-24 12:55:25 +0000[diff] [blame]140----------------------------------------------------------------
141
sewardj575e48f2008-12-18 20:21:13 +0000[diff] [blame]142Thread #x: Exiting thread still holds 1 lock
njn553c42f2009-03-13 01:41:03 +0000[diff] [blame]143 ...
sewardjb4112022007-11-09 22:49:28 +0000[diff] [blame]144
njncab64bc2009-08-12 00:14:44 +0000[diff] [blame]145
sewardjab195152008-11-10 00:16:34 +0000[diff] [blame]146ERROR SUMMARY: 11 errors from 11 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)