[NFC] Modernize enum 'UnqualifiedId::IdKind' into a scoped enum UnqualifiedIdKind.
llvm-svn: 321574
diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
index d94cb0d..7c6af57 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
@@ -169,16 +169,16 @@
MemberOfUnknownSpecialization = false;
switch (Name.getKind()) {
- case UnqualifiedId::IK_Identifier:
+ case UnqualifiedIdKind::IK_Identifier:
TName = DeclarationName(Name.Identifier);
break;
- case UnqualifiedId::IK_OperatorFunctionId:
+ case UnqualifiedIdKind::IK_OperatorFunctionId:
TName = Context.DeclarationNames.getCXXOperatorName(
Name.OperatorFunctionId.Operator);
break;
- case UnqualifiedId::IK_LiteralOperatorId:
+ case UnqualifiedIdKind::IK_LiteralOperatorId:
TName = Context.DeclarationNames.getCXXLiteralOperatorName(Name.Identifier);
break;
@@ -3557,7 +3557,7 @@
TemplateParameterList *TemplateParams, StorageClass SC,
bool IsPartialSpecialization) {
// D must be variable template id.
- assert(D.getName().getKind() == UnqualifiedId::IK_TemplateId &&
+ assert(D.getName().getKind() == UnqualifiedIdKind::IK_TemplateId &&
"Variable template specialization is declared with a template it.");
TemplateIdAnnotation *TemplateId = D.getName().TemplateId;
@@ -4084,8 +4084,8 @@
// We found something; return it.
auto *LookupRD = dyn_cast<CXXRecordDecl>(LookupCtx);
if (!AllowInjectedClassName && SS.isSet() && LookupRD &&
- Name.getKind() == UnqualifiedId::IK_Identifier && Name.Identifier &&
- LookupRD->getIdentifier() == Name.Identifier) {
+ Name.getKind() == UnqualifiedIdKind::IK_Identifier &&
+ Name.Identifier && LookupRD->getIdentifier() == Name.Identifier) {
// C++14 [class.qual]p2:
// In a lookup in which function names are not ignored and the
// nested-name-specifier nominates a class C, if the name specified
@@ -4107,17 +4107,17 @@
NestedNameSpecifier *Qualifier = SS.getScopeRep();
switch (Name.getKind()) {
- case UnqualifiedId::IK_Identifier:
+ case UnqualifiedIdKind::IK_Identifier:
Result = TemplateTy::make(Context.getDependentTemplateName(Qualifier,
Name.Identifier));
return TNK_Dependent_template_name;
- case UnqualifiedId::IK_OperatorFunctionId:
+ case UnqualifiedIdKind::IK_OperatorFunctionId:
Result = TemplateTy::make(Context.getDependentTemplateName(Qualifier,
Name.OperatorFunctionId.Operator));
return TNK_Function_template;
- case UnqualifiedId::IK_LiteralOperatorId:
+ case UnqualifiedIdKind::IK_LiteralOperatorId:
llvm_unreachable("literal operator id cannot have a dependent scope");
default:
@@ -9044,7 +9044,7 @@
return true;
}
- if (D.getName().getKind() != UnqualifiedId::IK_TemplateId) {
+ if (D.getName().getKind() != UnqualifiedIdKind::IK_TemplateId) {
// C++1y [temp.explicit]p3:
// If the explicit instantiation is for a variable, the unqualified-id
// in the declaration shall be a template-id.
@@ -9126,7 +9126,7 @@
// argument list into our AST format.
bool HasExplicitTemplateArgs = false;
TemplateArgumentListInfo TemplateArgs;
- if (D.getName().getKind() == UnqualifiedId::IK_TemplateId) {
+ if (D.getName().getKind() == UnqualifiedIdKind::IK_TemplateId) {
TemplateArgs = makeTemplateArgumentListInfo(*this, *D.getName().TemplateId);
HasExplicitTemplateArgs = true;
}
@@ -9292,7 +9292,7 @@
//
// C++98 has the same restriction, just worded differently.
FunctionTemplateDecl *FunTmpl = Specialization->getPrimaryTemplate();
- if (D.getName().getKind() != UnqualifiedId::IK_TemplateId && !FunTmpl &&
+ if (D.getName().getKind() != UnqualifiedIdKind::IK_TemplateId && !FunTmpl &&
D.getCXXScopeSpec().isSet() &&
!ScopeSpecifierHasTemplateId(D.getCXXScopeSpec()))
Diag(D.getIdentifierLoc(),