|  | // RUN: %clang_cc1 -analyze -analyzer-checker=core,debug.ExprInspection -triple x86_64-apple-darwin13 -Wno-shift-count-overflow -verify %s | 
|  |  | 
|  | void clang_analyzer_eval(int); | 
|  | #define CHECK(expr) if (!(expr)) return; clang_analyzer_eval(expr) | 
|  |  | 
|  | void testPersistentConstraints(int x, int y) { | 
|  | // Sanity check | 
|  | CHECK(x); // expected-warning{{TRUE}} | 
|  | CHECK(x & 1); // expected-warning{{TRUE}} | 
|  |  | 
|  | // False positives due to SValBuilder giving up on certain kinds of exprs. | 
|  | CHECK(1 - x); // expected-warning{{UNKNOWN}} | 
|  | CHECK(x & y); // expected-warning{{UNKNOWN}} | 
|  | } | 
|  |  | 
|  | int testConstantShifts_PR18073(int which) { | 
|  | // FIXME: We should have a checker that actually specifically checks bitwise | 
|  | // shifts against the width of the LHS's /static/ type, rather than just | 
|  | // having BasicValueFactory return "undefined" when dealing with two constant | 
|  | // operands. | 
|  | switch (which) { | 
|  | case 1: | 
|  | return 0ULL << 63; // no-warning | 
|  | case 2: | 
|  | return 0ULL << 64; // expected-warning{{The result of the '<<' expression is undefined}} | 
|  | case 3: | 
|  | return 0ULL << 65; // expected-warning{{The result of the '<<' expression is undefined}} | 
|  |  | 
|  | default: | 
|  | return 0; | 
|  | } | 
|  | } |