blob: 5c60b2ad08b82fbcb83673ff80649b47f6351271 [file] [log] [blame]
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +00001FileCheck - Flexible pattern matching file verifier
2===================================================
3
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +00004SYNOPSIS
5--------
6
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +00007:program:`FileCheck` *match-filename* [*--check-prefix=XXX*] [*--strict-whitespace*]
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +00008
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +00009DESCRIPTION
10-----------
11
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +000012:program:`FileCheck` reads two files (one from standard input, and one
13specified on the command line) and uses one to verify the other. This
14behavior is particularly useful for the testsuite, which wants to verify that
15the output of some tool (e.g. :program:`llc`) contains the expected information
16(for example, a movsd from esp or whatever is interesting). This is similar to
17using :program:`grep`, but it is optimized for matching multiple different
18inputs in one file in a specific order.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000019
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +000020The ``match-filename`` file specifies the file that contains the patterns to
Stephen Lina6e877f2013-07-14 18:12:25 +000021match. The file to verify is read from standard input unless the
22:option:`--input-file` option is used.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000023
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000024OPTIONS
25-------
26
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +000027.. option:: -help
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000028
29 Print a summary of command line options.
30
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +000031.. option:: --check-prefix prefix
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000032
Matt Arsenault13df4622013-11-10 02:04:09 +000033 FileCheck searches the contents of ``match-filename`` for patterns to
34 match. By default, these patterns are prefixed with "``CHECK:``".
35 If you'd like to use a different prefix (e.g. because the same input
36 file is checking multiple different tool or options), the
37 :option:`--check-prefix` argument allows you to specify one or more
38 prefixes to match. Multiple prefixes are useful for tests which might
39 change for different run options, but most lines remain the same.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000040
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +000041.. option:: --input-file filename
Eli Bendersky8a7e80f2012-11-07 01:41:30 +000042
43 File to check (defaults to stdin).
44
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +000045.. option:: --strict-whitespace
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000046
47 By default, FileCheck canonicalizes input horizontal whitespace (spaces and
48 tabs) which causes it to ignore these differences (a space will match a tab).
Guy Benyei5ea04c32013-02-06 20:40:38 +000049 The :option:`--strict-whitespace` argument disables this behavior. End-of-line
Sean Silvab6bfbad2013-06-21 00:27:54 +000050 sequences are canonicalized to UNIX-style ``\n`` in all modes.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000051
Alexander Kornienko56ccdbb2014-07-11 12:39:32 +000052.. option:: --implicit-check-not check-pattern
53
54 Adds implicit negative checks for the specified patterns between positive
55 checks. The option allows writing stricter tests without stuffing them with
56 ``CHECK-NOT``s.
57
58 For example, "``--implicit-check-not warning:``" can be useful when testing
59 diagnostic messages from tools that don't have an option similar to ``clang
60 -verify``. With this option FileCheck will verify that input does not contain
61 warnings not covered by any ``CHECK:`` patterns.
62
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +000063.. option:: -version
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000064
65 Show the version number of this program.
66
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000067EXIT STATUS
68-----------
69
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +000070If :program:`FileCheck` verifies that the file matches the expected contents,
71it exits with 0. Otherwise, if not, or if an error occurs, it will exit with a
72non-zero value.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000073
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000074TUTORIAL
75--------
76
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000077FileCheck is typically used from LLVM regression tests, being invoked on the RUN
78line of the test. A simple example of using FileCheck from a RUN line looks
79like this:
80
Dmitri Gribenkoa99fa5b2012-06-12 15:45:07 +000081.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000082
83 ; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -march=x86-64 | FileCheck %s
84
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +000085This syntax says to pipe the current file ("``%s``") into ``llvm-as``, pipe
86that into ``llc``, then pipe the output of ``llc`` into ``FileCheck``. This
87means that FileCheck will be verifying its standard input (the llc output)
88against the filename argument specified (the original ``.ll`` file specified by
89"``%s``"). To see how this works, let's look at the rest of the ``.ll`` file
90(after the RUN line):
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000091
Dmitri Gribenkoa99fa5b2012-06-12 15:45:07 +000092.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000093
94 define void @sub1(i32* %p, i32 %v) {
95 entry:
96 ; CHECK: sub1:
97 ; CHECK: subl
98 %0 = tail call i32 @llvm.atomic.load.sub.i32.p0i32(i32* %p, i32 %v)
99 ret void
100 }
101
102 define void @inc4(i64* %p) {
103 entry:
104 ; CHECK: inc4:
105 ; CHECK: incq
106 %0 = tail call i64 @llvm.atomic.load.add.i64.p0i64(i64* %p, i64 1)
107 ret void
108 }
109
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000110Here you can see some "``CHECK:``" lines specified in comments. Now you can
111see how the file is piped into ``llvm-as``, then ``llc``, and the machine code
112output is what we are verifying. FileCheck checks the machine code output to
113verify that it matches what the "``CHECK:``" lines specify.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000114
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000115The syntax of the "``CHECK:``" lines is very simple: they are fixed strings that
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000116must occur in order. FileCheck defaults to ignoring horizontal whitespace
117differences (e.g. a space is allowed to match a tab) but otherwise, the contents
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000118of the "``CHECK:``" line is required to match some thing in the test file exactly.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000119
120One nice thing about FileCheck (compared to grep) is that it allows merging
121test cases together into logical groups. For example, because the test above
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000122is checking for the "``sub1:``" and "``inc4:``" labels, it will not match
123unless there is a "``subl``" in between those labels. If it existed somewhere
124else in the file, that would not count: "``grep subl``" matches if "``subl``"
125exists anywhere in the file.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000126
127The FileCheck -check-prefix option
128~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
129
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +0000130The FileCheck :option:`-check-prefix` option allows multiple test
131configurations to be driven from one `.ll` file. This is useful in many
132circumstances, for example, testing different architectural variants with
133:program:`llc`. Here's a simple example:
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000134
Dmitri Gribenkoa99fa5b2012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000135.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000136
137 ; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -mtriple=i686-apple-darwin9 -mattr=sse41 \
Dmitri Gribenko19408a72012-06-12 00:48:47 +0000138 ; RUN: | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=X32
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000139 ; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -mtriple=x86_64-apple-darwin9 -mattr=sse41 \
Dmitri Gribenko19408a72012-06-12 00:48:47 +0000140 ; RUN: | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=X64
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000141
142 define <4 x i32> @pinsrd_1(i32 %s, <4 x i32> %tmp) nounwind {
143 %tmp1 = insertelement <4 x i32>; %tmp, i32 %s, i32 1
144 ret <4 x i32> %tmp1
145 ; X32: pinsrd_1:
146 ; X32: pinsrd $1, 4(%esp), %xmm0
147
148 ; X64: pinsrd_1:
149 ; X64: pinsrd $1, %edi, %xmm0
150 }
151
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000152In this case, we're testing that we get the expected code generation with
153both 32-bit and 64-bit code generation.
154
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000155The "CHECK-NEXT:" directive
156~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
157
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000158Sometimes you want to match lines and would like to verify that matches
159happen on exactly consecutive lines with no other lines in between them. In
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000160this case, you can use "``CHECK:``" and "``CHECK-NEXT:``" directives to specify
161this. If you specified a custom check prefix, just use "``<PREFIX>-NEXT:``".
162For example, something like this works as you'd expect:
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000163
Dmitri Gribenkoa99fa5b2012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000164.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000165
Dmitri Gribenko19408a72012-06-12 00:48:47 +0000166 define void @t2(<2 x double>* %r, <2 x double>* %A, double %B) {
167 %tmp3 = load <2 x double>* %A, align 16
168 %tmp7 = insertelement <2 x double> undef, double %B, i32 0
169 %tmp9 = shufflevector <2 x double> %tmp3,
170 <2 x double> %tmp7,
171 <2 x i32> < i32 0, i32 2 >
172 store <2 x double> %tmp9, <2 x double>* %r, align 16
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000173 ret void
174
175 ; CHECK: t2:
176 ; CHECK: movl 8(%esp), %eax
177 ; CHECK-NEXT: movapd (%eax), %xmm0
178 ; CHECK-NEXT: movhpd 12(%esp), %xmm0
179 ; CHECK-NEXT: movl 4(%esp), %eax
180 ; CHECK-NEXT: movapd %xmm0, (%eax)
181 ; CHECK-NEXT: ret
182 }
183
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000184"``CHECK-NEXT:``" directives reject the input unless there is exactly one
Eli Bendersky2fef6b62012-11-21 22:40:52 +0000185newline between it and the previous directive. A "``CHECK-NEXT:``" cannot be
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000186the first directive in a file.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000187
188The "CHECK-NOT:" directive
189~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
190
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000191The "``CHECK-NOT:``" directive is used to verify that a string doesn't occur
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000192between two matches (or before the first match, or after the last match). For
193example, to verify that a load is removed by a transformation, a test like this
194can be used:
195
Dmitri Gribenkoa99fa5b2012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000196.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000197
198 define i8 @coerce_offset0(i32 %V, i32* %P) {
199 store i32 %V, i32* %P
200
201 %P2 = bitcast i32* %P to i8*
202 %P3 = getelementptr i8* %P2, i32 2
203
204 %A = load i8* %P3
205 ret i8 %A
206 ; CHECK: @coerce_offset0
207 ; CHECK-NOT: load
208 ; CHECK: ret i8
209 }
210
Michael Liao91a1b2c2013-05-14 20:34:12 +0000211The "CHECK-DAG:" directive
212~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
213
214If it's necessary to match strings that don't occur in a strictly sequential
215order, "``CHECK-DAG:``" could be used to verify them between two matches (or
216before the first match, or after the last match). For example, clang emits
217vtable globals in reverse order. Using ``CHECK-DAG:``, we can keep the checks
218in the natural order:
219
220.. code-block:: c++
221
222 // RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -emit-llvm -o - | FileCheck %s
223
224 struct Foo { virtual void method(); };
225 Foo f; // emit vtable
226 // CHECK-DAG: @_ZTV3Foo =
227
228 struct Bar { virtual void method(); };
229 Bar b;
230 // CHECK-DAG: @_ZTV3Bar =
231
Renato Golin58ab84a2013-10-11 18:50:22 +0000232``CHECK-NOT:`` directives could be mixed with ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives to
233exclude strings between the surrounding ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives. As a result,
234the surrounding ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives cannot be reordered, i.e. all
235occurrences matching ``CHECK-DAG:`` before ``CHECK-NOT:`` must not fall behind
236occurrences matching ``CHECK-DAG:`` after ``CHECK-NOT:``. For example,
237
238.. code-block:: llvm
239
240 ; CHECK-DAG: BEFORE
241 ; CHECK-NOT: NOT
242 ; CHECK-DAG: AFTER
243
244This case will reject input strings where ``BEFORE`` occurs after ``AFTER``.
Michael Liao91a1b2c2013-05-14 20:34:12 +0000245
246With captured variables, ``CHECK-DAG:`` is able to match valid topological
247orderings of a DAG with edges from the definition of a variable to its use.
248It's useful, e.g., when your test cases need to match different output
249sequences from the instruction scheduler. For example,
250
251.. code-block:: llvm
252
253 ; CHECK-DAG: add [[REG1:r[0-9]+]], r1, r2
254 ; CHECK-DAG: add [[REG2:r[0-9]+]], r3, r4
255 ; CHECK: mul r5, [[REG1]], [[REG2]]
256
257In this case, any order of that two ``add`` instructions will be allowed.
258
Renato Golin58ab84a2013-10-11 18:50:22 +0000259If you are defining `and` using variables in the same ``CHECK-DAG:`` block,
260be aware that the definition rule can match `after` its use.
261
262So, for instance, the code below will pass:
Michael Liao91a1b2c2013-05-14 20:34:12 +0000263
264.. code-block:: llvm
265
Renato Golin58ab84a2013-10-11 18:50:22 +0000266 ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2:d[0-9]+]][0]
267 ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2]][1]
268 vmov.32 d0[1]
269 vmov.32 d0[0]
Michael Liao91a1b2c2013-05-14 20:34:12 +0000270
Renato Golin58ab84a2013-10-11 18:50:22 +0000271While this other code, will not:
272
273.. code-block:: llvm
274
275 ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2:d[0-9]+]][0]
276 ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2]][1]
277 vmov.32 d1[1]
278 vmov.32 d0[0]
279
280While this can be very useful, it's also dangerous, because in the case of
281register sequence, you must have a strong order (read before write, copy before
282use, etc). If the definition your test is looking for doesn't match (because
283of a bug in the compiler), it may match further away from the use, and mask
284real bugs away.
285
286In those cases, to enforce the order, use a non-DAG directive between DAG-blocks.
Michael Liao91a1b2c2013-05-14 20:34:12 +0000287
Stephen Linf8bd2e52013-07-12 14:51:05 +0000288The "CHECK-LABEL:" directive
Bill Wendlingc02da462013-07-30 08:26:24 +0000289~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Stephen Linf8bd2e52013-07-12 14:51:05 +0000290
291Sometimes in a file containing multiple tests divided into logical blocks, one
292or more ``CHECK:`` directives may inadvertently succeed by matching lines in a
293later block. While an error will usually eventually be generated, the check
294flagged as causing the error may not actually bear any relationship to the
295actual source of the problem.
296
297In order to produce better error messages in these cases, the "``CHECK-LABEL:``"
298directive can be used. It is treated identically to a normal ``CHECK``
Stephen Linb9464072013-07-18 23:26:58 +0000299directive except that FileCheck makes an additional assumption that a line
300matched by the directive cannot also be matched by any other check present in
301``match-filename``; this is intended to be used for lines containing labels or
302other unique identifiers. Conceptually, the presence of ``CHECK-LABEL`` divides
303the input stream into separate blocks, each of which is processed independently,
304preventing a ``CHECK:`` directive in one block matching a line in another block.
305For example,
Stephen Linf8bd2e52013-07-12 14:51:05 +0000306
307.. code-block:: llvm
308
309 define %struct.C* @C_ctor_base(%struct.C* %this, i32 %x) {
310 entry:
311 ; CHECK-LABEL: C_ctor_base:
312 ; CHECK: mov [[SAVETHIS:r[0-9]+]], r0
313 ; CHECK: bl A_ctor_base
314 ; CHECK: mov r0, [[SAVETHIS]]
315 %0 = bitcast %struct.C* %this to %struct.A*
316 %call = tail call %struct.A* @A_ctor_base(%struct.A* %0)
317 %1 = bitcast %struct.C* %this to %struct.B*
318 %call2 = tail call %struct.B* @B_ctor_base(%struct.B* %1, i32 %x)
319 ret %struct.C* %this
320 }
321
322 define %struct.D* @D_ctor_base(%struct.D* %this, i32 %x) {
323 entry:
324 ; CHECK-LABEL: D_ctor_base:
325
326The use of ``CHECK-LABEL:`` directives in this case ensures that the three
327``CHECK:`` directives only accept lines corresponding to the body of the
328``@C_ctor_base`` function, even if the patterns match lines found later in
Stephen Linb9464072013-07-18 23:26:58 +0000329the file. Furthermore, if one of these three ``CHECK:`` directives fail,
330FileCheck will recover by continuing to the next block, allowing multiple test
331failures to be detected in a single invocation.
Stephen Linf8bd2e52013-07-12 14:51:05 +0000332
333There is no requirement that ``CHECK-LABEL:`` directives contain strings that
334correspond to actual syntactic labels in a source or output language: they must
335simply uniquely match a single line in the file being verified.
336
337``CHECK-LABEL:`` directives cannot contain variable definitions or uses.
338
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000339FileCheck Pattern Matching Syntax
340~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
341
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000342The "``CHECK:``" and "``CHECK-NOT:``" directives both take a pattern to match.
343For most uses of FileCheck, fixed string matching is perfectly sufficient. For
344some things, a more flexible form of matching is desired. To support this,
345FileCheck allows you to specify regular expressions in matching strings,
346surrounded by double braces: ``{{yourregex}}``. Because we want to use fixed
347string matching for a majority of what we do, FileCheck has been designed to
348support mixing and matching fixed string matching with regular expressions.
349This allows you to write things like this:
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000350
Dmitri Gribenkoa99fa5b2012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000351.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000352
353 ; CHECK: movhpd {{[0-9]+}}(%esp), {{%xmm[0-7]}}
354
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000355In this case, any offset from the ESP register will be allowed, and any xmm
356register will be allowed.
357
358Because regular expressions are enclosed with double braces, they are
359visually distinct, and you don't need to use escape characters within the double
360braces like you would in C. In the rare case that you want to match double
361braces explicitly from the input, you can use something ugly like
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000362``{{[{][{]}}`` as your pattern.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000363
364FileCheck Variables
365~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
366
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000367It is often useful to match a pattern and then verify that it occurs again
368later in the file. For codegen tests, this can be useful to allow any register,
Eli Bendersky4ca99ba2012-12-01 22:03:57 +0000369but verify that that register is used consistently later. To do this,
370:program:`FileCheck` allows named variables to be defined and substituted into
371patterns. Here is a simple example:
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000372
Dmitri Gribenkoa99fa5b2012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000373.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000374
375 ; CHECK: test5:
376 ; CHECK: notw [[REGISTER:%[a-z]+]]
Chad Rosierfd7469c2012-05-24 21:17:47 +0000377 ; CHECK: andw {{.*}}[[REGISTER]]
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000378
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000379The first check line matches a regex ``%[a-z]+`` and captures it into the
380variable ``REGISTER``. The second line verifies that whatever is in
Eli Bendersky4ca99ba2012-12-01 22:03:57 +0000381``REGISTER`` occurs later in the file after an "``andw``". :program:`FileCheck`
382variable references are always contained in ``[[ ]]`` pairs, and their names can
383be formed with the regex ``[a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z0-9]*``. If a colon follows the name,
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000384then it is a definition of the variable; otherwise, it is a use.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000385
Eli Bendersky4ca99ba2012-12-01 22:03:57 +0000386:program:`FileCheck` variables can be defined multiple times, and uses always
387get the latest value. Variables can also be used later on the same line they
388were defined on. For example:
389
390.. code-block:: llvm
391
392 ; CHECK: op [[REG:r[0-9]+]], [[REG]]
393
394Can be useful if you want the operands of ``op`` to be the same register,
395and don't care exactly which register it is.
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000396
Alexander Kornienko92987fb2012-11-14 21:07:37 +0000397FileCheck Expressions
398~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
399
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +0000400Sometimes there's a need to verify output which refers line numbers of the
401match file, e.g. when testing compiler diagnostics. This introduces a certain
402fragility of the match file structure, as "``CHECK:``" lines contain absolute
403line numbers in the same file, which have to be updated whenever line numbers
404change due to text addition or deletion.
Alexander Kornienko92987fb2012-11-14 21:07:37 +0000405
406To support this case, FileCheck allows using ``[[@LINE]]``,
407``[[@LINE+<offset>]]``, ``[[@LINE-<offset>]]`` expressions in patterns. These
408expressions expand to a number of the line where a pattern is located (with an
409optional integer offset).
410
411This way match patterns can be put near the relevant test lines and include
412relative line number references, for example:
413
414.. code-block:: c++
415
416 // CHECK: test.cpp:[[@LINE+4]]:6: error: expected ';' after top level declarator
417 // CHECK-NEXT: {{^int a}}
418 // CHECK-NEXT: {{^ \^}}
419 // CHECK-NEXT: {{^ ;}}
420 int a
421