blob: ed7b24fa60462ad1a3a7fbb8f9566ae2f921e498 [file] [log] [blame]
Jingyue Wu8cb6b2a2015-04-14 04:59:22 +00001//===- NaryReassociate.cpp - Reassociate n-ary expressions ----------------===//
2//
3// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
4//
5// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
6// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
7//
8//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
9//
10// This pass reassociates n-ary add expressions and eliminates the redundancy
11// exposed by the reassociation.
12//
13// A motivating example:
14//
15// void foo(int a, int b) {
16// bar(a + b);
17// bar((a + 2) + b);
18// }
19//
20// An ideal compiler should reassociate (a + 2) + b to (a + b) + 2 and simplify
21// the above code to
22//
23// int t = a + b;
24// bar(t);
25// bar(t + 2);
26//
27// However, the Reassociate pass is unable to do that because it processes each
28// instruction individually and believes (a + 2) + b is the best form according
29// to its rank system.
30//
31// To address this limitation, NaryReassociate reassociates an expression in a
32// form that reuses existing instructions. As a result, NaryReassociate can
33// reassociate (a + 2) + b in the example to (a + b) + 2 because it detects that
34// (a + b) is computed before.
35//
36// NaryReassociate works as follows. For every instruction in the form of (a +
37// b) + c, it checks whether a + c or b + c is already computed by a dominating
38// instruction. If so, it then reassociates (a + b) + c into (a + c) + b or (b +
39// c) + a respectively. To efficiently look up whether an expression is
40// computed before, we store each instruction seen and its SCEV into an
41// SCEV-to-instruction map.
42//
43// Although the algorithm pattern-matches only ternary additions, it
44// automatically handles many >3-ary expressions by walking through the function
45// in the depth-first order. For example, given
46//
47// (a + c) + d
48// ((a + b) + c) + d
49//
50// NaryReassociate first rewrites (a + b) + c to (a + c) + b, and then rewrites
51// ((a + c) + b) + d into ((a + c) + d) + b.
52//
53// Limitations and TODO items:
54//
55// 1) We only considers n-ary adds for now. This should be extended and
56// generalized.
57//
58// 2) Besides arithmetic operations, similar reassociation can be applied to
59// GEPs. For example, if
60// X = &arr[a]
61// dominates
62// Y = &arr[a + b]
63// we may rewrite Y into X + b.
64//
65//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
66
67#include "llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.h"
68#include "llvm/IR/Dominators.h"
69#include "llvm/IR/Module.h"
70#include "llvm/IR/PatternMatch.h"
71#include "llvm/Transforms/Scalar.h"
72using namespace llvm;
73using namespace PatternMatch;
74
75#define DEBUG_TYPE "nary-reassociate"
76
77namespace {
78class NaryReassociate : public FunctionPass {
79public:
80 static char ID;
81
82 NaryReassociate(): FunctionPass(ID) {
83 initializeNaryReassociatePass(*PassRegistry::getPassRegistry());
84 }
85
86 bool runOnFunction(Function &F) override;
87
88 void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const override {
89 AU.addPreserved<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>();
90 AU.addRequired<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>();
91 // TODO: can we preserve ScalarEvolution?
92 AU.addRequired<ScalarEvolution>();
93 AU.setPreservesCFG();
94 }
95
96private:
97 // Reasssociates I to a better form.
98 Instruction *tryReassociateAdd(Instruction *I);
99 // A helper function for tryReassociateAdd. LHS and RHS are explicitly passed.
100 Instruction *tryReassociateAdd(Value *LHS, Value *RHS, Instruction *I);
101 // Rewrites I to LHS + RHS if LHS is computed already.
102 Instruction *tryReassociatedAdd(const SCEV *LHS, Value *RHS, Instruction *I);
103
104 DominatorTree *DT;
105 ScalarEvolution *SE;
106 // A lookup table quickly telling which instructions compute the given SCEV.
107 // Note that there can be multiple instructions at different locations
108 // computing to the same SCEV. For example,
109 // if (p1)
110 // foo(a + b);
111 // if (p2)
112 // bar(a + b);
113 DenseMap<const SCEV *, SmallVector<Instruction *, 2>> SeenExprs;
114};
115} // anonymous namespace
116
117char NaryReassociate::ID = 0;
118INITIALIZE_PASS_BEGIN(NaryReassociate, "nary-reassociate", "Nary reassociation",
119 false, false)
120INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(DominatorTreeWrapperPass)
121INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(ScalarEvolution)
122INITIALIZE_PASS_END(NaryReassociate, "nary-reassociate", "Nary reassociation",
123 false, false)
124
125FunctionPass *llvm::createNaryReassociatePass() {
126 return new NaryReassociate();
127}
128
129bool NaryReassociate::runOnFunction(Function &F) {
130 if (skipOptnoneFunction(F))
131 return false;
132
133 DT = &getAnalysis<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>().getDomTree();
134 SE = &getAnalysis<ScalarEvolution>();
135
136 // Traverse the dominator tree in the depth-first order. This order makes sure
137 // all bases of a candidate are in Candidates when we process it.
138 bool Changed = false;
139 SeenExprs.clear();
140 for (auto Node = GraphTraits<DominatorTree *>::nodes_begin(DT);
141 Node != GraphTraits<DominatorTree *>::nodes_end(DT); ++Node) {
142 BasicBlock *BB = Node->getBlock();
143 for (auto I = BB->begin(); I != BB->end(); ++I) {
144 if (I->getOpcode() == Instruction::Add) {
145 if (Instruction *NewI = tryReassociateAdd(I)) {
146 I->replaceAllUsesWith(NewI);
147 I->eraseFromParent();
148 I = NewI;
149 }
150 // We should add the rewritten instruction because tryReassociateAdd may
151 // have invalidated the original one.
152 SeenExprs[SE->getSCEV(I)].push_back(I);
153 }
154 }
155 }
156 return Changed;
157}
158
159Instruction *NaryReassociate::tryReassociateAdd(Instruction *I) {
160 Value *LHS = I->getOperand(0), *RHS = I->getOperand(1);
161 if (auto *NewI = tryReassociateAdd(LHS, RHS, I))
162 return NewI;
163 if (auto *NewI = tryReassociateAdd(RHS, LHS, I))
164 return NewI;
165 return nullptr;
166}
167
168Instruction *NaryReassociate::tryReassociateAdd(Value *LHS, Value *RHS,
169 Instruction *I) {
170 Value *A = nullptr, *B = nullptr;
171 // To be conservative, we reassociate I only when it is the only user of A+B.
172 if (LHS->hasOneUse() && match(LHS, m_Add(m_Value(A), m_Value(B)))) {
173 // I = (A + B) + RHS
174 // = (A + RHS) + B or (B + RHS) + A
175 const SCEV *AExpr = SE->getSCEV(A), *BExpr = SE->getSCEV(B);
176 const SCEV *RHSExpr = SE->getSCEV(RHS);
177 if (auto *NewI = tryReassociatedAdd(SE->getAddExpr(AExpr, RHSExpr), B, I))
178 return NewI;
179 if (auto *NewI = tryReassociatedAdd(SE->getAddExpr(BExpr, RHSExpr), A, I))
180 return NewI;
181 }
182 return nullptr;
183}
184
185Instruction *NaryReassociate::tryReassociatedAdd(const SCEV *LHSExpr,
186 Value *RHS, Instruction *I) {
187 auto Pos = SeenExprs.find(LHSExpr);
188 // Bail out if LHSExpr is not previously seen.
189 if (Pos == SeenExprs.end())
190 return nullptr;
191
192 auto &LHSCandidates = Pos->second;
193 unsigned NumIterations = 0;
194 // Search at most 10 items to avoid running quadratically.
195 static const unsigned MaxNumIterations = 10;
196 for (auto LHS = LHSCandidates.rbegin();
197 LHS != LHSCandidates.rend() && NumIterations < MaxNumIterations;
198 ++LHS, ++NumIterations) {
199 if (DT->dominates(*LHS, I)) {
200 Instruction *NewI = BinaryOperator::CreateAdd(*LHS, RHS, "", I);
201 NewI->takeName(I);
202 return NewI;
203 }
204 }
205 return nullptr;
206}