Jingyue Wu | 42f1d67 | 2015-07-28 18:22:40 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | ; RUN: opt < %s -S -analyze -scalar-evolution | FileCheck %s |
| 2 | |
| 3 | ; Positive and negative tests for inferring flags like nsw from |
| 4 | ; reasoning about how a poison value from overflow would trigger |
| 5 | ; undefined behavior. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | define void @foo() { |
| 8 | ret void |
| 9 | } |
| 10 | |
| 11 | ; Example where an add should get the nsw flag, so that a sext can be |
| 12 | ; distributed over the add. |
| 13 | define void @test-add-nsw(float* %input, i32 %offset, i32 %numIterations) { |
| 14 | ; CHECK-LABEL: @test-add-nsw |
| 15 | entry: |
| 16 | br label %loop |
| 17 | loop: |
| 18 | %i = phi i32 [ %nexti, %loop ], [ 0, %entry ] |
| 19 | |
| 20 | ; CHECK: %index32 = |
| 21 | ; CHECK: --> {%offset,+,1}<nsw> |
| 22 | %index32 = add nsw i32 %i, %offset |
| 23 | |
| 24 | ; CHECK: %index64 = |
| 25 | ; CHECK: --> {(sext i32 %offset to i64),+,1}<nsw> |
| 26 | %index64 = sext i32 %index32 to i64 |
| 27 | |
| 28 | %ptr = getelementptr inbounds float, float* %input, i64 %index64 |
| 29 | %nexti = add nsw i32 %i, 1 |
| 30 | %f = load float, float* %ptr, align 4 |
| 31 | call void @foo() |
| 32 | %exitcond = icmp eq i32 %nexti, %numIterations |
| 33 | br i1 %exitcond, label %exit, label %loop |
| 34 | exit: |
| 35 | ret void |
| 36 | } |
| 37 | |
| 38 | ; Example where an add should get the nuw flag. |
| 39 | define void @test-add-nuw(float* %input, i32 %offset, i32 %numIterations) { |
| 40 | ; CHECK-LABEL: @test-add-nuw |
| 41 | entry: |
| 42 | br label %loop |
| 43 | loop: |
| 44 | %i = phi i32 [ %nexti, %loop ], [ 0, %entry ] |
| 45 | |
| 46 | ; CHECK: %index32 = |
| 47 | ; CHECK: --> {%offset,+,1}<nuw> |
| 48 | %index32 = add nuw i32 %i, %offset |
| 49 | |
| 50 | %ptr = getelementptr inbounds float, float* %input, i32 %index32 |
| 51 | %nexti = add nuw i32 %i, 1 |
| 52 | %f = load float, float* %ptr, align 4 |
| 53 | %exitcond = icmp eq i32 %nexti, %numIterations |
| 54 | br i1 %exitcond, label %exit, label %loop |
| 55 | |
| 56 | exit: |
| 57 | ret void |
| 58 | } |
| 59 | |
| 60 | ; With no load to trigger UB from poison, we cannot infer nsw. |
| 61 | define void @test-add-no-load(float* %input, i32 %offset, i32 %numIterations) { |
| 62 | ; CHECK-LABEL: @test-add-no-load |
| 63 | entry: |
| 64 | br label %loop |
| 65 | loop: |
| 66 | %i = phi i32 [ %nexti, %loop ], [ 0, %entry ] |
| 67 | |
| 68 | ; CHECK: %index32 = |
| 69 | ; CHECK: --> {%offset,+,1}<nw> |
| 70 | %index32 = add nsw i32 %i, %offset |
| 71 | |
| 72 | %ptr = getelementptr inbounds float, float* %input, i32 %index32 |
| 73 | %nexti = add nuw i32 %i, 1 |
| 74 | %exitcond = icmp eq i32 %nexti, %numIterations |
| 75 | br i1 %exitcond, label %exit, label %loop |
| 76 | |
| 77 | exit: |
| 78 | ret void |
| 79 | } |
| 80 | |
| 81 | ; The current code is only supposed to look at the loop header, so |
| 82 | ; it should not infer nsw in this case, as that would require looking |
| 83 | ; outside the loop header. |
| 84 | define void @test-add-not-header(float* %input, i32 %offset, i32 %numIterations) { |
| 85 | ; CHECK-LABEL: @test-add-not-header |
| 86 | entry: |
| 87 | br label %loop |
| 88 | loop: |
| 89 | %i = phi i32 [ %nexti, %loop2 ], [ 0, %entry ] |
| 90 | br label %loop2 |
| 91 | loop2: |
| 92 | |
| 93 | ; CHECK: %index32 = |
| 94 | ; CHECK: --> {%offset,+,1}<nw> |
| 95 | %index32 = add nsw i32 %i, %offset |
| 96 | |
| 97 | %ptr = getelementptr inbounds float, float* %input, i32 %index32 |
| 98 | %nexti = add nsw i32 %i, 1 |
| 99 | %f = load float, float* %ptr, align 4 |
| 100 | %exitcond = icmp eq i32 %nexti, %numIterations |
| 101 | br i1 %exitcond, label %exit, label %loop |
| 102 | exit: |
| 103 | ret void |
| 104 | } |
| 105 | |
| 106 | ; Same thing as test-add-not-header, but in this case only the load |
| 107 | ; instruction is outside the loop header. |
| 108 | define void @test-add-not-header2(float* %input, i32 %offset, i32 %numIterations) { |
| 109 | ; CHECK-LABEL: @test-add-not-header2 |
| 110 | entry: |
| 111 | br label %loop |
| 112 | loop: |
| 113 | %i = phi i32 [ %nexti, %loop2 ], [ 0, %entry ] |
| 114 | |
| 115 | ; CHECK: %index32 = |
| 116 | ; CHECK: --> {%offset,+,1}<nw> |
| 117 | %index32 = add nsw i32 %i, %offset |
| 118 | |
| 119 | %ptr = getelementptr inbounds float, float* %input, i32 %index32 |
| 120 | %nexti = add nsw i32 %i, 1 |
| 121 | br label %loop2 |
| 122 | loop2: |
| 123 | %f = load float, float* %ptr, align 4 |
| 124 | %exitcond = icmp eq i32 %nexti, %numIterations |
| 125 | br i1 %exitcond, label %exit, label %loop |
| 126 | exit: |
| 127 | ret void |
| 128 | } |
| 129 | |
| 130 | ; The call instruction makes it not guaranteed that the add will be |
| 131 | ; executed, since it could run forever or throw an exception, so we |
| 132 | ; cannot assume that the UB is realized. |
| 133 | define void @test-add-call(float* %input, i32 %offset, i32 %numIterations) { |
| 134 | ; CHECK-LABEL: @test-add-call |
| 135 | entry: |
| 136 | br label %loop |
| 137 | loop: |
| 138 | %i = phi i32 [ %nexti, %loop ], [ 0, %entry ] |
| 139 | |
| 140 | ; CHECK: %index32 = |
| 141 | ; CHECK: --> {%offset,+,1}<nw> |
| 142 | call void @foo() |
| 143 | %index32 = add nsw i32 %i, %offset |
| 144 | |
| 145 | %ptr = getelementptr inbounds float, float* %input, i32 %index32 |
| 146 | %nexti = add nsw i32 %i, 1 |
| 147 | %f = load float, float* %ptr, align 4 |
| 148 | %exitcond = icmp eq i32 %nexti, %numIterations |
| 149 | br i1 %exitcond, label %exit, label %loop |
| 150 | exit: |
| 151 | ret void |
| 152 | } |
| 153 | |
| 154 | ; Same issue as test-add-call, but this time the call is between the |
| 155 | ; producer of poison and the load that consumes it. |
| 156 | define void @test-add-call2(float* %input, i32 %offset, i32 %numIterations) { |
| 157 | ; CHECK-LABEL: @test-add-call2 |
| 158 | entry: |
| 159 | br label %loop |
| 160 | loop: |
| 161 | %i = phi i32 [ %nexti, %loop ], [ 0, %entry ] |
| 162 | |
| 163 | ; CHECK: %index32 = |
| 164 | ; CHECK: --> {%offset,+,1}<nw> |
| 165 | %index32 = add nsw i32 %i, %offset |
| 166 | |
| 167 | %ptr = getelementptr inbounds float, float* %input, i32 %index32 |
| 168 | %nexti = add nsw i32 %i, 1 |
| 169 | call void @foo() |
| 170 | %f = load float, float* %ptr, align 4 |
| 171 | %exitcond = icmp eq i32 %nexti, %numIterations |
| 172 | br i1 %exitcond, label %exit, label %loop |
| 173 | exit: |
| 174 | ret void |
| 175 | } |
| 176 | |
| 177 | ; Without inbounds, GEP does not propagate poison in the very |
| 178 | ; conservative approach used here. |
| 179 | define void @test-add-no-inbounds(float* %input, i32 %offset, i32 %numIterations) { |
| 180 | ; CHECK-LABEL: @test-add-no-inbounds |
| 181 | entry: |
| 182 | br label %loop |
| 183 | loop: |
| 184 | %i = phi i32 [ %nexti, %loop ], [ 0, %entry ] |
| 185 | |
| 186 | ; CHECK: %index32 = |
| 187 | ; CHECK: --> {%offset,+,1}<nw> |
| 188 | %index32 = add nsw i32 %i, %offset |
| 189 | |
| 190 | %ptr = getelementptr float, float* %input, i32 %index32 |
| 191 | %nexti = add nsw i32 %i, 1 |
| 192 | %f = load float, float* %ptr, align 4 |
| 193 | %exitcond = icmp eq i32 %nexti, %numIterations |
| 194 | br i1 %exitcond, label %exit, label %loop |
| 195 | exit: |
| 196 | ret void |
| 197 | } |
| 198 | |
| 199 | ; Multiplication by a non-zero constant propagates poison if there is |
| 200 | ; a nuw or nsw flag on the multiplication. |
| 201 | define void @test-add-mul-propagates(float* %input, i32 %offset, i32 %numIterations) { |
| 202 | ; CHECK-LABEL: @test-add-mul-propagates |
| 203 | entry: |
| 204 | br label %loop |
| 205 | loop: |
| 206 | %i = phi i32 [ %nexti, %loop ], [ 0, %entry ] |
| 207 | |
| 208 | ; CHECK: %index32 = |
| 209 | ; CHECK: --> {%offset,+,1}<nsw> |
| 210 | %index32 = add nsw i32 %i, %offset |
| 211 | |
| 212 | %indexmul = mul nuw i32 %index32, 2 |
| 213 | %ptr = getelementptr inbounds float, float* %input, i32 %indexmul |
| 214 | %nexti = add nsw i32 %i, 1 |
| 215 | %f = load float, float* %ptr, align 4 |
| 216 | %exitcond = icmp eq i32 %nexti, %numIterations |
| 217 | br i1 %exitcond, label %exit, label %loop |
| 218 | exit: |
| 219 | ret void |
| 220 | } |
| 221 | |
| 222 | ; Multiplication by a non-constant should not propagate poison in the |
| 223 | ; very conservative approach used here. |
| 224 | define void @test-add-mul-no-propagation(float* %input, i32 %offset, i32 %numIterations) { |
| 225 | ; CHECK-LABEL: @test-add-mul-no-propagation |
| 226 | entry: |
| 227 | br label %loop |
| 228 | loop: |
| 229 | %i = phi i32 [ %nexti, %loop ], [ 0, %entry ] |
| 230 | |
| 231 | ; CHECK: %index32 = |
| 232 | ; CHECK: --> {%offset,+,1}<nw> |
| 233 | %index32 = add nsw i32 %i, %offset |
| 234 | |
| 235 | %indexmul = mul nsw i32 %index32, %offset |
| 236 | %ptr = getelementptr inbounds float, float* %input, i32 %indexmul |
| 237 | %nexti = add nsw i32 %i, 1 |
| 238 | %f = load float, float* %ptr, align 4 |
| 239 | %exitcond = icmp eq i32 %nexti, %numIterations |
| 240 | br i1 %exitcond, label %exit, label %loop |
| 241 | exit: |
| 242 | ret void |
| 243 | } |
| 244 | |
| 245 | ; Multiplication by a non-zero constant does not propagate poison |
| 246 | ; without a no-wrap flag. |
| 247 | define void @test-add-mul-no-propagation2(float* %input, i32 %offset, i32 %numIterations) { |
| 248 | ; CHECK-LABEL: @test-add-mul-no-propagation2 |
| 249 | entry: |
| 250 | br label %loop |
| 251 | loop: |
| 252 | %i = phi i32 [ %nexti, %loop ], [ 0, %entry ] |
| 253 | |
| 254 | ; CHECK: %index32 = |
| 255 | ; CHECK: --> {%offset,+,1}<nw> |
| 256 | %index32 = add nsw i32 %i, %offset |
| 257 | |
| 258 | %indexmul = mul i32 %index32, 2 |
| 259 | %ptr = getelementptr inbounds float, float* %input, i32 %indexmul |
| 260 | %nexti = add nsw i32 %i, 1 |
| 261 | %f = load float, float* %ptr, align 4 |
| 262 | %exitcond = icmp eq i32 %nexti, %numIterations |
| 263 | br i1 %exitcond, label %exit, label %loop |
| 264 | exit: |
| 265 | ret void |
| 266 | } |
| 267 | |
| 268 | ; Division by poison triggers UB. |
| 269 | define void @test-add-div(float* %input, i32 %offset, i32 %numIterations) { |
| 270 | ; CHECK-LABEL: @test-add-div |
| 271 | entry: |
| 272 | br label %loop |
| 273 | loop: |
| 274 | %i = phi i32 [ %nexti, %loop ], [ 0, %entry ] |
| 275 | |
| 276 | ; CHECK: %j = |
| 277 | ; CHECK: --> {%offset,+,1}<nsw> |
| 278 | %j = add nsw i32 %i, %offset |
| 279 | |
| 280 | %q = sdiv i32 %numIterations, %j |
| 281 | %nexti = add nsw i32 %i, 1 |
| 282 | %exitcond = icmp eq i32 %nexti, %numIterations |
| 283 | br i1 %exitcond, label %exit, label %loop |
| 284 | exit: |
| 285 | ret void |
| 286 | } |
| 287 | |
| 288 | ; Remainder of poison by non-poison divisor does not trigger UB. |
| 289 | define void @test-add-div2(float* %input, i32 %offset, i32 %numIterations) { |
| 290 | ; CHECK-LABEL: @test-add-div2 |
| 291 | entry: |
| 292 | br label %loop |
| 293 | loop: |
| 294 | %i = phi i32 [ %nexti, %loop ], [ 0, %entry ] |
| 295 | |
| 296 | ; CHECK: %j = |
| 297 | ; CHECK: --> {%offset,+,1}<nw> |
| 298 | %j = add nsw i32 %i, %offset |
| 299 | |
| 300 | %q = sdiv i32 %j, %numIterations |
| 301 | %nexti = add nsw i32 %i, 1 |
| 302 | %exitcond = icmp eq i32 %nexti, %numIterations |
| 303 | br i1 %exitcond, label %exit, label %loop |
| 304 | exit: |
| 305 | ret void |
| 306 | } |
| 307 | |
| 308 | ; Store to poison address triggers UB. |
| 309 | define void @test-add-store(float* %input, i32 %offset, i32 %numIterations) { |
| 310 | ; CHECK-LABEL: @test-add-store |
| 311 | entry: |
| 312 | br label %loop |
| 313 | loop: |
| 314 | %i = phi i32 [ %nexti, %loop ], [ 0, %entry ] |
| 315 | |
| 316 | ; CHECK: %index32 = |
| 317 | ; CHECK: --> {%offset,+,1}<nsw> |
| 318 | %index32 = add nsw i32 %i, %offset |
| 319 | |
| 320 | %ptr = getelementptr inbounds float, float* %input, i32 %index32 |
| 321 | %nexti = add nsw i32 %i, 1 |
| 322 | store float 1.0, float* %ptr, align 4 |
| 323 | %exitcond = icmp eq i32 %nexti, %numIterations |
| 324 | br i1 %exitcond, label %exit, label %loop |
| 325 | exit: |
| 326 | ret void |
| 327 | } |
| 328 | |
| 329 | ; Three sequential adds where the middle add should have nsw. There is |
| 330 | ; a special case for sequential adds and this test covers that. We have to |
| 331 | ; put the final add first in the program since otherwise the special case |
| 332 | ; is not triggered, hence the strange basic block ordering. |
| 333 | define void @test-add-twice(float* %input, i32 %offset, i32 %numIterations) { |
| 334 | ; CHECK-LABEL: @test-add-twice |
| 335 | entry: |
| 336 | br label %loop |
| 337 | loop2: |
| 338 | ; CHECK: %seq = |
| 339 | ; CHECK: --> {(2 + %offset),+,1}<nw> |
| 340 | %seq = add nsw nuw i32 %index32, 1 |
| 341 | %exitcond = icmp eq i32 %nexti, %numIterations |
| 342 | br i1 %exitcond, label %exit, label %loop |
| 343 | |
| 344 | loop: |
| 345 | %i = phi i32 [ %nexti, %loop2 ], [ 0, %entry ] |
| 346 | |
| 347 | %j = add nsw i32 %i, 1 |
| 348 | ; CHECK: %index32 = |
| 349 | ; CHECK: --> {(1 + %offset),+,1}<nsw> |
| 350 | %index32 = add nsw i32 %j, %offset |
| 351 | |
| 352 | %ptr = getelementptr inbounds float, float* %input, i32 %index32 |
| 353 | %nexti = add nsw i32 %i, 1 |
| 354 | store float 1.0, float* %ptr, align 4 |
| 355 | br label %loop2 |
| 356 | exit: |
| 357 | ret void |
| 358 | } |
Bjarke Hammersholt Roune | 9791ed4 | 2015-08-14 22:45:26 +0000 | [diff] [blame^] | 359 | |
| 360 | ; Example where a mul should get the nsw flag, so that a sext can be |
| 361 | ; distributed over the mul. |
| 362 | define void @test-mul-nsw(float* %input, i32 %stride, i32 %numIterations) { |
| 363 | ; CHECK-LABEL: @test-mul-nsw |
| 364 | entry: |
| 365 | br label %loop |
| 366 | loop: |
| 367 | %i = phi i32 [ %nexti, %loop ], [ 0, %entry ] |
| 368 | |
| 369 | ; CHECK: %index32 = |
| 370 | ; CHECK: --> {0,+,%stride}<nsw> |
| 371 | %index32 = mul nsw i32 %i, %stride |
| 372 | |
| 373 | ; CHECK: %index64 = |
| 374 | ; CHECK: --> {0,+,(sext i32 %stride to i64)}<nsw> |
| 375 | %index64 = sext i32 %index32 to i64 |
| 376 | |
| 377 | %ptr = getelementptr inbounds float, float* %input, i64 %index64 |
| 378 | %nexti = add nsw i32 %i, 1 |
| 379 | %f = load float, float* %ptr, align 4 |
| 380 | %exitcond = icmp eq i32 %nexti, %numIterations |
| 381 | br i1 %exitcond, label %exit, label %loop |
| 382 | exit: |
| 383 | ret void |
| 384 | } |
| 385 | |
| 386 | ; Example where a mul should get the nuw flag. |
| 387 | define void @test-mul-nuw(float* %input, i32 %stride, i32 %numIterations) { |
| 388 | ; CHECK-LABEL: @test-mul-nuw |
| 389 | entry: |
| 390 | br label %loop |
| 391 | loop: |
| 392 | %i = phi i32 [ %nexti, %loop ], [ 0, %entry ] |
| 393 | |
| 394 | ; CHECK: %index32 = |
| 395 | ; CHECK: --> {0,+,%stride}<nuw> |
| 396 | %index32 = mul nuw i32 %i, %stride |
| 397 | |
| 398 | %ptr = getelementptr inbounds float, float* %input, i32 %index32 |
| 399 | %nexti = add nuw i32 %i, 1 |
| 400 | %f = load float, float* %ptr, align 4 |
| 401 | %exitcond = icmp eq i32 %nexti, %numIterations |
| 402 | br i1 %exitcond, label %exit, label %loop |
| 403 | |
| 404 | exit: |
| 405 | ret void |
| 406 | } |
| 407 | |
| 408 | ; Example where a shl should get the nsw flag, so that a sext can be |
| 409 | ; distributed over the shl. |
| 410 | define void @test-shl-nsw(float* %input, i32 %start, i32 %numIterations) { |
| 411 | ; CHECK-LABEL: @test-shl-nsw |
| 412 | entry: |
| 413 | br label %loop |
| 414 | loop: |
| 415 | %i = phi i32 [ %nexti, %loop ], [ %start, %entry ] |
| 416 | |
| 417 | ; CHECK: %index32 = |
| 418 | ; CHECK: --> {(256 * %start),+,256}<nsw> |
| 419 | %index32 = shl nsw i32 %i, 8 |
| 420 | |
| 421 | ; CHECK: %index64 = |
| 422 | ; CHECK: --> {(sext i32 (256 * %start) to i64),+,256}<nsw> |
| 423 | %index64 = sext i32 %index32 to i64 |
| 424 | |
| 425 | %ptr = getelementptr inbounds float, float* %input, i64 %index64 |
| 426 | %nexti = add nsw i32 %i, 1 |
| 427 | %f = load float, float* %ptr, align 4 |
| 428 | %exitcond = icmp eq i32 %nexti, %numIterations |
| 429 | br i1 %exitcond, label %exit, label %loop |
| 430 | exit: |
| 431 | ret void |
| 432 | } |
| 433 | |
| 434 | ; Example where a shl should get the nuw flag. |
| 435 | define void @test-shl-nuw(float* %input, i32 %numIterations) { |
| 436 | ; CHECK-LABEL: @test-shl-nuw |
| 437 | entry: |
| 438 | br label %loop |
| 439 | loop: |
| 440 | %i = phi i32 [ %nexti, %loop ], [ 0, %entry ] |
| 441 | |
| 442 | ; CHECK: %index32 = |
| 443 | ; CHECK: --> {0,+,512}<nuw> |
| 444 | %index32 = shl nuw i32 %i, 9 |
| 445 | |
| 446 | %ptr = getelementptr inbounds float, float* %input, i32 %index32 |
| 447 | %nexti = add nuw i32 %i, 1 |
| 448 | %f = load float, float* %ptr, align 4 |
| 449 | %exitcond = icmp eq i32 %nexti, %numIterations |
| 450 | br i1 %exitcond, label %exit, label %loop |
| 451 | |
| 452 | exit: |
| 453 | ret void |
| 454 | } |
| 455 | |
| 456 | ; Example where a sub should *not* get the nsw flag, because of how |
| 457 | ; scalar evolution represents A - B as A + (-B) and -B can wrap even |
| 458 | ; in cases where A - B does not. |
| 459 | define void @test-sub-no-nsw(float* %input, i32 %start, i32 %sub, i32 %numIterations) { |
| 460 | ; CHECK-LABEL: @test-sub-no-nsw |
| 461 | entry: |
| 462 | br label %loop |
| 463 | loop: |
| 464 | %i = phi i32 [ %nexti, %loop ], [ %start, %entry ] |
| 465 | |
| 466 | ; CHECK: %index32 = |
| 467 | ; CHECK: --> {((-1 * %sub) + %start),+,1}<nw> |
| 468 | %index32 = sub nsw i32 %i, %sub |
| 469 | %index64 = sext i32 %index32 to i64 |
| 470 | |
| 471 | %ptr = getelementptr inbounds float, float* %input, i64 %index64 |
| 472 | %nexti = add nsw i32 %i, 1 |
| 473 | %f = load float, float* %ptr, align 4 |
| 474 | %exitcond = icmp eq i32 %nexti, %numIterations |
| 475 | br i1 %exitcond, label %exit, label %loop |
| 476 | exit: |
| 477 | ret void |
| 478 | } |
| 479 | |
| 480 | ; Example where a sub should get the nsw flag as the RHS cannot be the |
| 481 | ; minimal signed value. |
| 482 | define void @test-sub-nsw(float* %input, i32 %start, i32 %sub, i32 %numIterations) { |
| 483 | ; CHECK-LABEL: @test-sub-nsw |
| 484 | entry: |
| 485 | %halfsub = ashr i32 %sub, 1 |
| 486 | br label %loop |
| 487 | loop: |
| 488 | %i = phi i32 [ %nexti, %loop ], [ %start, %entry ] |
| 489 | |
| 490 | ; CHECK: %index32 = |
| 491 | ; CHECK: --> {((-1 * %halfsub)<nsw> + %start),+,1}<nsw> |
| 492 | %index32 = sub nsw i32 %i, %halfsub |
| 493 | %index64 = sext i32 %index32 to i64 |
| 494 | |
| 495 | %ptr = getelementptr inbounds float, float* %input, i64 %index64 |
| 496 | %nexti = add nsw i32 %i, 1 |
| 497 | %f = load float, float* %ptr, align 4 |
| 498 | %exitcond = icmp eq i32 %nexti, %numIterations |
| 499 | br i1 %exitcond, label %exit, label %loop |
| 500 | exit: |
| 501 | ret void |
| 502 | } |
| 503 | |
| 504 | ; Example where a sub should get the nsw flag, since the LHS is non-negative, |
| 505 | ; which implies that the RHS cannot be the minimal signed value. |
| 506 | define void @test-sub-nsw-lhs-non-negative(float* %input, i32 %sub, i32 %numIterations) { |
| 507 | ; CHECK-LABEL: @test-sub-nsw-lhs-non-negative |
| 508 | entry: |
| 509 | br label %loop |
| 510 | loop: |
| 511 | %i = phi i32 [ %nexti, %loop ], [ 0, %entry ] |
| 512 | |
| 513 | ; CHECK: %index32 = |
| 514 | ; CHECK: --> {(-1 * %sub),+,1}<nsw> |
| 515 | %index32 = sub nsw i32 %i, %sub |
| 516 | |
| 517 | ; CHECK: %index64 = |
| 518 | ; CHECK: --> {(sext i32 (-1 * %sub) to i64),+,1}<nsw> |
| 519 | %index64 = sext i32 %index32 to i64 |
| 520 | |
| 521 | %ptr = getelementptr inbounds float, float* %input, i64 %index64 |
| 522 | %nexti = add nsw i32 %i, 1 |
| 523 | %f = load float, float* %ptr, align 4 |
| 524 | %exitcond = icmp eq i32 %nexti, %numIterations |
| 525 | br i1 %exitcond, label %exit, label %loop |
| 526 | exit: |
| 527 | ret void |
| 528 | } |
| 529 | |
| 530 | ; Two adds with a sub in the middle and the sub should have nsw. There is |
| 531 | ; a special case for sequential adds/subs and this test covers that. We have to |
| 532 | ; put the final add first in the program since otherwise the special case |
| 533 | ; is not triggered, hence the strange basic block ordering. |
| 534 | define void @test-sub-with-add(float* %input, i32 %offset, i32 %numIterations) { |
| 535 | ; CHECK-LABEL: @test-sub-with-add |
| 536 | entry: |
| 537 | br label %loop |
| 538 | loop2: |
| 539 | ; CHECK: %seq = |
| 540 | ; CHECK: --> {(2 + (-1 * %offset)),+,1}<nw> |
| 541 | %seq = add nsw nuw i32 %index32, 1 |
| 542 | %exitcond = icmp eq i32 %nexti, %numIterations |
| 543 | br i1 %exitcond, label %exit, label %loop |
| 544 | |
| 545 | loop: |
| 546 | %i = phi i32 [ %nexti, %loop2 ], [ 0, %entry ] |
| 547 | |
| 548 | %j = add nsw i32 %i, 1 |
| 549 | ; CHECK: %index32 = |
| 550 | ; CHECK: --> {(1 + (-1 * %offset)),+,1}<nsw> |
| 551 | %index32 = sub nsw i32 %j, %offset |
| 552 | |
| 553 | %ptr = getelementptr inbounds float, float* %input, i32 %index32 |
| 554 | %nexti = add nsw i32 %i, 1 |
| 555 | store float 1.0, float* %ptr, align 4 |
| 556 | br label %loop2 |
| 557 | exit: |
| 558 | ret void |
| 559 | } |
| 560 | |
| 561 | |
| 562 | ; Subtraction of two recurrences. The addition in the SCEV that this |
| 563 | ; maps to is NSW, but the negation of the RHS does not since that |
| 564 | ; recurrence could be the most negative representable value. |
| 565 | define void @subrecurrences(i32 %outer_l, i32 %inner_l, i32 %val) { |
| 566 | ; CHECK-LABEL: @subrecurrences |
| 567 | entry: |
| 568 | br label %outer |
| 569 | |
| 570 | outer: |
| 571 | %o_idx = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %o_idx.inc, %outer.be ] |
| 572 | %o_idx.inc = add nsw i32 %o_idx, 1 |
| 573 | %cond = icmp eq i32 %o_idx, %val |
| 574 | br i1 %cond, label %inner, label %outer.be |
| 575 | |
| 576 | inner: |
| 577 | %i_idx = phi i32 [ 0, %outer ], [ %i_idx.inc, %inner ] |
| 578 | %i_idx.inc = add nsw i32 %i_idx, 1 |
| 579 | ; CHECK: %v = |
| 580 | ; CHECK-NEXT: --> {{[{][{]}}-1,+,-1}<nw><%outer>,+,1}<nsw><%inner> |
| 581 | %v = sub nsw i32 %i_idx, %o_idx.inc |
| 582 | %forub = udiv i32 1, %v |
| 583 | %cond2 = icmp eq i32 %i_idx, %inner_l |
| 584 | br i1 %cond2, label %outer.be, label %inner |
| 585 | |
| 586 | outer.be: |
| 587 | %cond3 = icmp eq i32 %o_idx, %outer_l |
| 588 | br i1 %cond3, label %exit, label %outer |
| 589 | |
| 590 | exit: |
| 591 | ret void |
| 592 | } |