| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | //===- CGSCCPassManagerTest.cpp -------------------------------------------===// |
| 2 | // |
| Chandler Carruth | 2946cd7 | 2019-01-19 08:50:56 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 3 | // Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions. |
| 4 | // See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information. |
| 5 | // SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception |
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 6 | // |
| 7 | //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// |
| 8 | |
| 9 | #include "llvm/Analysis/CGSCCPassManager.h" |
| 10 | #include "llvm/Analysis/LazyCallGraph.h" |
| Chandler Carruth | f59a838 | 2017-07-15 08:08:19 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 11 | #include "llvm/Analysis/TargetLibraryInfo.h" |
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 12 | #include "llvm/AsmParser/Parser.h" |
| 13 | #include "llvm/IR/Function.h" |
| 14 | #include "llvm/IR/InstIterator.h" |
| 15 | #include "llvm/IR/LLVMContext.h" |
| 16 | #include "llvm/IR/Module.h" |
| 17 | #include "llvm/IR/PassManager.h" |
| 18 | #include "llvm/Support/SourceMgr.h" |
| 19 | #include "gtest/gtest.h" |
| 20 | |
| 21 | using namespace llvm; |
| 22 | |
| 23 | namespace { |
| 24 | |
| Chandler Carruth | dab4eae | 2016-11-23 17:53:26 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 25 | class TestModuleAnalysis : public AnalysisInfoMixin<TestModuleAnalysis> { |
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 26 | public: |
| 27 | struct Result { |
| 28 | Result(int Count) : FunctionCount(Count) {} |
| 29 | int FunctionCount; |
| 30 | }; |
| 31 | |
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 32 | TestModuleAnalysis(int &Runs) : Runs(Runs) {} |
| 33 | |
| Chandler Carruth | b47f801 | 2016-03-11 11:05:24 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 34 | Result run(Module &M, ModuleAnalysisManager &AM) { |
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 35 | ++Runs; |
| 36 | return Result(M.size()); |
| 37 | } |
| 38 | |
| 39 | private: |
| Chandler Carruth | dab4eae | 2016-11-23 17:53:26 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 40 | friend AnalysisInfoMixin<TestModuleAnalysis>; |
| 41 | static AnalysisKey Key; |
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 42 | |
| 43 | int &Runs; |
| 44 | }; |
| 45 | |
| Chandler Carruth | dab4eae | 2016-11-23 17:53:26 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 46 | AnalysisKey TestModuleAnalysis::Key; |
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 47 | |
| Chandler Carruth | dab4eae | 2016-11-23 17:53:26 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 48 | class TestSCCAnalysis : public AnalysisInfoMixin<TestSCCAnalysis> { |
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 49 | public: |
| 50 | struct Result { |
| 51 | Result(int Count) : FunctionCount(Count) {} |
| 52 | int FunctionCount; |
| 53 | }; |
| 54 | |
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 55 | TestSCCAnalysis(int &Runs) : Runs(Runs) {} |
| 56 | |
| Chandler Carruth | 8882346 | 2016-08-24 09:37:14 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 57 | Result run(LazyCallGraph::SCC &C, CGSCCAnalysisManager &AM, LazyCallGraph &) { |
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 58 | ++Runs; |
| 59 | return Result(C.size()); |
| 60 | } |
| 61 | |
| 62 | private: |
| Chandler Carruth | dab4eae | 2016-11-23 17:53:26 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 63 | friend AnalysisInfoMixin<TestSCCAnalysis>; |
| 64 | static AnalysisKey Key; |
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 65 | |
| 66 | int &Runs; |
| 67 | }; |
| 68 | |
| Chandler Carruth | dab4eae | 2016-11-23 17:53:26 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 69 | AnalysisKey TestSCCAnalysis::Key; |
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 70 | |
| Chandler Carruth | dab4eae | 2016-11-23 17:53:26 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 71 | class TestFunctionAnalysis : public AnalysisInfoMixin<TestFunctionAnalysis> { |
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 72 | public: |
| 73 | struct Result { |
| 74 | Result(int Count) : InstructionCount(Count) {} |
| 75 | int InstructionCount; |
| 76 | }; |
| 77 | |
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 78 | TestFunctionAnalysis(int &Runs) : Runs(Runs) {} |
| 79 | |
| Chandler Carruth | b47f801 | 2016-03-11 11:05:24 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 80 | Result run(Function &F, FunctionAnalysisManager &AM) { |
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 81 | ++Runs; |
| 82 | int Count = 0; |
| 83 | for (Instruction &I : instructions(F)) { |
| 84 | (void)I; |
| 85 | ++Count; |
| 86 | } |
| 87 | return Result(Count); |
| 88 | } |
| 89 | |
| 90 | private: |
| Chandler Carruth | dab4eae | 2016-11-23 17:53:26 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 91 | friend AnalysisInfoMixin<TestFunctionAnalysis>; |
| 92 | static AnalysisKey Key; |
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 93 | |
| 94 | int &Runs; |
| 95 | }; |
| 96 | |
| Chandler Carruth | dab4eae | 2016-11-23 17:53:26 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 97 | AnalysisKey TestFunctionAnalysis::Key; |
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 98 | |
| Chandler Carruth | dab4eae | 2016-11-23 17:53:26 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 99 | class TestImmutableFunctionAnalysis |
| 100 | : public AnalysisInfoMixin<TestImmutableFunctionAnalysis> { |
| Chandler Carruth | c5d211e | 2016-02-23 10:47:57 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 101 | public: |
| 102 | struct Result { |
| Chandler Carruth | 3ab2a5a | 2016-11-28 22:04:31 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 103 | bool invalidate(Function &, const PreservedAnalyses &, |
| 104 | FunctionAnalysisManager::Invalidator &) { |
| 105 | return false; |
| 106 | } |
| Chandler Carruth | c5d211e | 2016-02-23 10:47:57 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 107 | }; |
| 108 | |
| Chandler Carruth | c5d211e | 2016-02-23 10:47:57 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 109 | TestImmutableFunctionAnalysis(int &Runs) : Runs(Runs) {} |
| 110 | |
| Chandler Carruth | b47f801 | 2016-03-11 11:05:24 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 111 | Result run(Function &F, FunctionAnalysisManager &AM) { |
| Chandler Carruth | c5d211e | 2016-02-23 10:47:57 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 112 | ++Runs; |
| 113 | return Result(); |
| 114 | } |
| 115 | |
| 116 | private: |
| Chandler Carruth | dab4eae | 2016-11-23 17:53:26 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 117 | friend AnalysisInfoMixin<TestImmutableFunctionAnalysis>; |
| 118 | static AnalysisKey Key; |
| Chandler Carruth | c5d211e | 2016-02-23 10:47:57 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 119 | |
| 120 | int &Runs; |
| 121 | }; |
| 122 | |
| Chandler Carruth | dab4eae | 2016-11-23 17:53:26 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 123 | AnalysisKey TestImmutableFunctionAnalysis::Key; |
| Chandler Carruth | c5d211e | 2016-02-23 10:47:57 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 124 | |
| Chandler Carruth | 6b98164 | 2016-12-10 06:34:44 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 125 | struct LambdaModulePass : public PassInfoMixin<LambdaModulePass> { |
| 126 | template <typename T> |
| 127 | LambdaModulePass(T &&Arg) : Func(std::forward<T>(Arg)) {} |
| 128 | |
| 129 | PreservedAnalyses run(Module &F, ModuleAnalysisManager &AM) { |
| 130 | return Func(F, AM); |
| 131 | } |
| 132 | |
| 133 | std::function<PreservedAnalyses(Module &, ModuleAnalysisManager &)> Func; |
| 134 | }; |
| 135 | |
| Chandler Carruth | d4e80a9 | 2016-09-02 01:08:04 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 136 | struct LambdaSCCPass : public PassInfoMixin<LambdaSCCPass> { |
| 137 | template <typename T> LambdaSCCPass(T &&Arg) : Func(std::forward<T>(Arg)) {} |
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 138 | |
| Chandler Carruth | 8882346 | 2016-08-24 09:37:14 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 139 | PreservedAnalyses run(LazyCallGraph::SCC &C, CGSCCAnalysisManager &AM, |
| 140 | LazyCallGraph &CG, CGSCCUpdateResult &UR) { |
| Chandler Carruth | d4e80a9 | 2016-09-02 01:08:04 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 141 | return Func(C, AM, CG, UR); |
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 142 | } |
| 143 | |
| Chandler Carruth | d4e80a9 | 2016-09-02 01:08:04 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 144 | std::function<PreservedAnalyses(LazyCallGraph::SCC &, CGSCCAnalysisManager &, |
| 145 | LazyCallGraph &, CGSCCUpdateResult &)> |
| 146 | Func; |
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 147 | }; |
| 148 | |
| Chandler Carruth | d4e80a9 | 2016-09-02 01:08:04 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 149 | struct LambdaFunctionPass : public PassInfoMixin<LambdaFunctionPass> { |
| Chandler Carruth | 6b98164 | 2016-12-10 06:34:44 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 150 | template <typename T> |
| 151 | LambdaFunctionPass(T &&Arg) : Func(std::forward<T>(Arg)) {} |
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 152 | |
| Chandler Carruth | d4e80a9 | 2016-09-02 01:08:04 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 153 | PreservedAnalyses run(Function &F, FunctionAnalysisManager &AM) { |
| 154 | return Func(F, AM); |
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 155 | } |
| 156 | |
| Chandler Carruth | d4e80a9 | 2016-09-02 01:08:04 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 157 | std::function<PreservedAnalyses(Function &, FunctionAnalysisManager &)> Func; |
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 158 | }; |
| 159 | |
| Chandler Carruth | 6c138ce | 2016-06-28 00:38:42 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 160 | std::unique_ptr<Module> parseIR(const char *IR) { |
| 161 | // We just use a static context here. This is never called from multiple |
| 162 | // threads so it is harmless no matter how it is implemented. We just need |
| 163 | // the context to outlive the module which it does. |
| 164 | static LLVMContext C; |
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 165 | SMDiagnostic Err; |
| 166 | return parseAssemblyString(IR, Err, C); |
| 167 | } |
| 168 | |
| Chandler Carruth | 4f83742 | 2016-09-02 01:14:05 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 169 | class CGSCCPassManagerTest : public ::testing::Test { |
| 170 | protected: |
| 171 | LLVMContext Context; |
| Chandler Carruth | dc288a8 | 2016-09-26 06:29:21 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 172 | FunctionAnalysisManager FAM; |
| 173 | CGSCCAnalysisManager CGAM; |
| 174 | ModuleAnalysisManager MAM; |
| 175 | |
| Chandler Carruth | 4f83742 | 2016-09-02 01:14:05 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 176 | std::unique_ptr<Module> M; |
| 177 | |
| 178 | public: |
| 179 | CGSCCPassManagerTest() |
| Chandler Carruth | dc288a8 | 2016-09-26 06:29:21 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 180 | : FAM(/*DebugLogging*/ true), CGAM(/*DebugLogging*/ true), |
| Chandler Carruth | 4cf2c89 | 2016-11-28 03:40:33 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 181 | MAM(/*DebugLogging*/ true), |
| 182 | M(parseIR( |
| 183 | // Define a module with the following call graph, where calls go |
| 184 | // out the bottom of nodes and enter the top: |
| 185 | // |
| 186 | // f |
| 187 | // |\ _ |
| 188 | // | \ / | |
| 189 | // g h1 | |
| 190 | // | | | |
| 191 | // | h2 | |
| 192 | // | | | |
| 193 | // | h3 | |
| 194 | // | / \_/ |
| 195 | // |/ |
| 196 | // x |
| 197 | // |
| 198 | "define void @f() {\n" |
| 199 | "entry:\n" |
| 200 | " call void @g()\n" |
| 201 | " call void @h1()\n" |
| 202 | " ret void\n" |
| 203 | "}\n" |
| 204 | "define void @g() {\n" |
| 205 | "entry:\n" |
| 206 | " call void @g()\n" |
| 207 | " call void @x()\n" |
| 208 | " ret void\n" |
| 209 | "}\n" |
| 210 | "define void @h1() {\n" |
| 211 | "entry:\n" |
| 212 | " call void @h2()\n" |
| 213 | " ret void\n" |
| 214 | "}\n" |
| 215 | "define void @h2() {\n" |
| 216 | "entry:\n" |
| 217 | " call void @h3()\n" |
| 218 | " call void @x()\n" |
| 219 | " ret void\n" |
| 220 | "}\n" |
| 221 | "define void @h3() {\n" |
| 222 | "entry:\n" |
| 223 | " call void @h1()\n" |
| 224 | " ret void\n" |
| 225 | "}\n" |
| 226 | "define void @x() {\n" |
| 227 | "entry:\n" |
| 228 | " ret void\n" |
| 229 | "}\n")) { |
| Chandler Carruth | f59a838 | 2017-07-15 08:08:19 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 230 | MAM.registerPass([&] { return TargetLibraryAnalysis(); }); |
| Chandler Carruth | dc288a8 | 2016-09-26 06:29:21 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 231 | MAM.registerPass([&] { return LazyCallGraphAnalysis(); }); |
| 232 | MAM.registerPass([&] { return FunctionAnalysisManagerModuleProxy(FAM); }); |
| Fedor Sergeev | ee8d31c | 2018-09-20 17:08:45 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 233 | |
| 234 | // Register required pass instrumentation analysis. |
| 235 | MAM.registerPass([&] { return PassInstrumentationAnalysis(); }); |
| 236 | CGAM.registerPass([&] { return PassInstrumentationAnalysis(); }); |
| 237 | FAM.registerPass([&] { return PassInstrumentationAnalysis(); }); |
| 238 | |
| 239 | // Cross-register proxies. |
| Chandler Carruth | dc288a8 | 2016-09-26 06:29:21 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 240 | MAM.registerPass([&] { return CGSCCAnalysisManagerModuleProxy(CGAM); }); |
| Chandler Carruth | 6b98164 | 2016-12-10 06:34:44 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 241 | CGAM.registerPass([&] { return FunctionAnalysisManagerCGSCCProxy(); }); |
| Chandler Carruth | dc288a8 | 2016-09-26 06:29:21 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 242 | CGAM.registerPass([&] { return ModuleAnalysisManagerCGSCCProxy(MAM); }); |
| 243 | FAM.registerPass([&] { return CGSCCAnalysisManagerFunctionProxy(CGAM); }); |
| 244 | FAM.registerPass([&] { return ModuleAnalysisManagerFunctionProxy(MAM); }); |
| 245 | } |
| Chandler Carruth | 4f83742 | 2016-09-02 01:14:05 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 246 | }; |
| 247 | |
| 248 | TEST_F(CGSCCPassManagerTest, Basic) { |
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 249 | int FunctionAnalysisRuns = 0; |
| 250 | FAM.registerPass([&] { return TestFunctionAnalysis(FunctionAnalysisRuns); }); |
| Chandler Carruth | c5d211e | 2016-02-23 10:47:57 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 251 | int ImmutableFunctionAnalysisRuns = 0; |
| 252 | FAM.registerPass([&] { |
| 253 | return TestImmutableFunctionAnalysis(ImmutableFunctionAnalysisRuns); |
| 254 | }); |
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 255 | |
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 256 | int SCCAnalysisRuns = 0; |
| 257 | CGAM.registerPass([&] { return TestSCCAnalysis(SCCAnalysisRuns); }); |
| 258 | |
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 259 | int ModuleAnalysisRuns = 0; |
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 260 | MAM.registerPass([&] { return TestModuleAnalysis(ModuleAnalysisRuns); }); |
| 261 | |
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 262 | ModulePassManager MPM(/*DebugLogging*/ true); |
| Chandler Carruth | d4e80a9 | 2016-09-02 01:08:04 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 263 | MPM.addPass(RequireAnalysisPass<TestModuleAnalysis, Module>()); |
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 264 | |
| 265 | CGSCCPassManager CGPM1(/*DebugLogging*/ true); |
| Chandler Carruth | 6b98164 | 2016-12-10 06:34:44 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 266 | FunctionPassManager FPM1(/*DebugLogging*/ true); |
| 267 | int FunctionPassRunCount1 = 0; |
| 268 | FPM1.addPass(LambdaFunctionPass([&](Function &, FunctionAnalysisManager &) { |
| 269 | ++FunctionPassRunCount1; |
| 270 | return PreservedAnalyses::none(); |
| 271 | })); |
| 272 | CGPM1.addPass(createCGSCCToFunctionPassAdaptor(std::move(FPM1))); |
| 273 | |
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 274 | int SCCPassRunCount1 = 0; |
| 275 | int AnalyzedInstrCount1 = 0; |
| 276 | int AnalyzedSCCFunctionCount1 = 0; |
| 277 | int AnalyzedModuleFunctionCount1 = 0; |
| Chandler Carruth | d4e80a9 | 2016-09-02 01:08:04 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 278 | CGPM1.addPass( |
| 279 | LambdaSCCPass([&](LazyCallGraph::SCC &C, CGSCCAnalysisManager &AM, |
| 280 | LazyCallGraph &CG, CGSCCUpdateResult &UR) { |
| 281 | ++SCCPassRunCount1; |
| 282 | |
| 283 | const ModuleAnalysisManager &MAM = |
| 284 | AM.getResult<ModuleAnalysisManagerCGSCCProxy>(C, CG).getManager(); |
| 285 | FunctionAnalysisManager &FAM = |
| 286 | AM.getResult<FunctionAnalysisManagerCGSCCProxy>(C, CG).getManager(); |
| 287 | if (TestModuleAnalysis::Result *TMA = |
| 288 | MAM.getCachedResult<TestModuleAnalysis>( |
| 289 | *C.begin()->getFunction().getParent())) |
| 290 | AnalyzedModuleFunctionCount1 += TMA->FunctionCount; |
| 291 | |
| 292 | TestSCCAnalysis::Result &AR = AM.getResult<TestSCCAnalysis>(C, CG); |
| 293 | AnalyzedSCCFunctionCount1 += AR.FunctionCount; |
| 294 | for (LazyCallGraph::Node &N : C) { |
| 295 | TestFunctionAnalysis::Result &FAR = |
| 296 | FAM.getResult<TestFunctionAnalysis>(N.getFunction()); |
| 297 | AnalyzedInstrCount1 += FAR.InstructionCount; |
| 298 | |
| 299 | // Just ensure we get the immutable results. |
| 300 | (void)FAM.getResult<TestImmutableFunctionAnalysis>(N.getFunction()); |
| 301 | } |
| 302 | |
| 303 | return PreservedAnalyses::all(); |
| 304 | })); |
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 305 | |
| Chandler Carruth | 6b98164 | 2016-12-10 06:34:44 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 306 | FunctionPassManager FPM2(/*DebugLogging*/ true); |
| 307 | int FunctionPassRunCount2 = 0; |
| 308 | FPM2.addPass(LambdaFunctionPass([&](Function &, FunctionAnalysisManager &) { |
| 309 | ++FunctionPassRunCount2; |
| 310 | return PreservedAnalyses::none(); |
| Chandler Carruth | d4e80a9 | 2016-09-02 01:08:04 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 311 | })); |
| Chandler Carruth | 6b98164 | 2016-12-10 06:34:44 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 312 | CGPM1.addPass(createCGSCCToFunctionPassAdaptor(std::move(FPM2))); |
| 313 | |
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 314 | MPM.addPass(createModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor(std::move(CGPM1))); |
| 315 | |
| Chandler Carruth | 6b98164 | 2016-12-10 06:34:44 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 316 | FunctionPassManager FPM3(/*DebugLogging*/ true); |
| 317 | int FunctionPassRunCount3 = 0; |
| 318 | FPM3.addPass(LambdaFunctionPass([&](Function &, FunctionAnalysisManager &) { |
| 319 | ++FunctionPassRunCount3; |
| 320 | return PreservedAnalyses::none(); |
| 321 | })); |
| 322 | MPM.addPass(createModuleToFunctionPassAdaptor(std::move(FPM3))); |
| 323 | |
| Chandler Carruth | b47f801 | 2016-03-11 11:05:24 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 324 | MPM.run(*M, MAM); |
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 325 | |
| Chandler Carruth | 6b98164 | 2016-12-10 06:34:44 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 326 | EXPECT_EQ(4, SCCPassRunCount1); |
| 327 | EXPECT_EQ(6, FunctionPassRunCount1); |
| 328 | EXPECT_EQ(6, FunctionPassRunCount2); |
| 329 | EXPECT_EQ(6, FunctionPassRunCount3); |
| 330 | |
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 331 | EXPECT_EQ(1, ModuleAnalysisRuns); |
| 332 | EXPECT_EQ(4, SCCAnalysisRuns); |
| 333 | EXPECT_EQ(6, FunctionAnalysisRuns); |
| Chandler Carruth | c5d211e | 2016-02-23 10:47:57 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 334 | EXPECT_EQ(6, ImmutableFunctionAnalysisRuns); |
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 335 | |
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 336 | EXPECT_EQ(14, AnalyzedInstrCount1); |
| 337 | EXPECT_EQ(6, AnalyzedSCCFunctionCount1); |
| 338 | EXPECT_EQ(4 * 6, AnalyzedModuleFunctionCount1); |
| 339 | } |
| 340 | |
| Chandler Carruth | b52b573 | 2016-09-26 04:01:55 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 341 | // Test that an SCC pass which fails to preserve a module analysis does in fact |
| 342 | // invalidate that module analysis. |
| 343 | TEST_F(CGSCCPassManagerTest, TestSCCPassInvalidatesModuleAnalysis) { |
| Chandler Carruth | b52b573 | 2016-09-26 04:01:55 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 344 | int ModuleAnalysisRuns = 0; |
| 345 | MAM.registerPass([&] { return TestModuleAnalysis(ModuleAnalysisRuns); }); |
| 346 | |
| 347 | ModulePassManager MPM(/*DebugLogging*/ true); |
| 348 | MPM.addPass(RequireAnalysisPass<TestModuleAnalysis, Module>()); |
| 349 | |
| 350 | // The first CGSCC run we preserve everything and make sure that works and |
| 351 | // the module analysis is available in the second CGSCC run from the one |
| 352 | // required module pass above. |
| 353 | CGSCCPassManager CGPM1(/*DebugLogging*/ true); |
| 354 | int CountFoundModuleAnalysis1 = 0; |
| 355 | CGPM1.addPass( |
| 356 | LambdaSCCPass([&](LazyCallGraph::SCC &C, CGSCCAnalysisManager &AM, |
| 357 | LazyCallGraph &CG, CGSCCUpdateResult &UR) { |
| 358 | const auto &MAM = |
| 359 | AM.getResult<ModuleAnalysisManagerCGSCCProxy>(C, CG).getManager(); |
| 360 | auto *TMA = MAM.getCachedResult<TestModuleAnalysis>( |
| 361 | *C.begin()->getFunction().getParent()); |
| 362 | |
| 363 | if (TMA) |
| 364 | ++CountFoundModuleAnalysis1; |
| 365 | |
| 366 | return PreservedAnalyses::all(); |
| 367 | })); |
| 368 | MPM.addPass(createModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor(std::move(CGPM1))); |
| 369 | |
| 370 | // The second CGSCC run checks that the module analysis got preserved the |
| 371 | // previous time and in one SCC fails to preserve it. |
| 372 | CGSCCPassManager CGPM2(/*DebugLogging*/ true); |
| 373 | int CountFoundModuleAnalysis2 = 0; |
| 374 | CGPM2.addPass( |
| 375 | LambdaSCCPass([&](LazyCallGraph::SCC &C, CGSCCAnalysisManager &AM, |
| 376 | LazyCallGraph &CG, CGSCCUpdateResult &UR) { |
| 377 | const auto &MAM = |
| 378 | AM.getResult<ModuleAnalysisManagerCGSCCProxy>(C, CG).getManager(); |
| 379 | auto *TMA = MAM.getCachedResult<TestModuleAnalysis>( |
| 380 | *C.begin()->getFunction().getParent()); |
| 381 | |
| 382 | if (TMA) |
| 383 | ++CountFoundModuleAnalysis2; |
| 384 | |
| 385 | // Only fail to preserve analyses on one SCC and make sure that gets |
| 386 | // propagated. |
| 387 | return C.getName() == "(g)" ? PreservedAnalyses::none() |
| 388 | : PreservedAnalyses::all(); |
| 389 | })); |
| 390 | MPM.addPass(createModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor(std::move(CGPM2))); |
| 391 | |
| 392 | // The third CGSCC run should fail to find a cached module analysis as it |
| 393 | // should have been invalidated by the above CGSCC run. |
| 394 | CGSCCPassManager CGPM3(/*DebugLogging*/ true); |
| 395 | int CountFoundModuleAnalysis3 = 0; |
| 396 | CGPM3.addPass( |
| 397 | LambdaSCCPass([&](LazyCallGraph::SCC &C, CGSCCAnalysisManager &AM, |
| 398 | LazyCallGraph &CG, CGSCCUpdateResult &UR) { |
| 399 | const auto &MAM = |
| 400 | AM.getResult<ModuleAnalysisManagerCGSCCProxy>(C, CG).getManager(); |
| 401 | auto *TMA = MAM.getCachedResult<TestModuleAnalysis>( |
| 402 | *C.begin()->getFunction().getParent()); |
| 403 | |
| 404 | if (TMA) |
| 405 | ++CountFoundModuleAnalysis3; |
| 406 | |
| 407 | return PreservedAnalyses::none(); |
| 408 | })); |
| 409 | MPM.addPass(createModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor(std::move(CGPM3))); |
| 410 | |
| 411 | MPM.run(*M, MAM); |
| 412 | |
| 413 | EXPECT_EQ(1, ModuleAnalysisRuns); |
| 414 | EXPECT_EQ(4, CountFoundModuleAnalysis1); |
| 415 | EXPECT_EQ(4, CountFoundModuleAnalysis2); |
| 416 | EXPECT_EQ(0, CountFoundModuleAnalysis3); |
| 417 | } |
| 418 | |
| Chandler Carruth | e35f84a | 2016-09-26 04:17:12 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 419 | // Similar to the above, but test that this works for function passes embedded |
| 420 | // *within* a CGSCC layer. |
| 421 | TEST_F(CGSCCPassManagerTest, TestFunctionPassInsideCGSCCInvalidatesModuleAnalysis) { |
| Chandler Carruth | e35f84a | 2016-09-26 04:17:12 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 422 | int ModuleAnalysisRuns = 0; |
| 423 | MAM.registerPass([&] { return TestModuleAnalysis(ModuleAnalysisRuns); }); |
| 424 | |
| 425 | ModulePassManager MPM(/*DebugLogging*/ true); |
| 426 | MPM.addPass(RequireAnalysisPass<TestModuleAnalysis, Module>()); |
| 427 | |
| 428 | // The first run we preserve everything and make sure that works and the |
| 429 | // module analysis is available in the second run from the one required |
| 430 | // module pass above. |
| 431 | FunctionPassManager FPM1(/*DebugLogging*/ true); |
| 432 | // Start true and mark false if we ever failed to find a module analysis |
| 433 | // because we expect this to succeed for each SCC. |
| 434 | bool FoundModuleAnalysis1 = true; |
| 435 | FPM1.addPass( |
| 436 | LambdaFunctionPass([&](Function &F, FunctionAnalysisManager &AM) { |
| 437 | const auto &MAM = |
| 438 | AM.getResult<ModuleAnalysisManagerFunctionProxy>(F).getManager(); |
| 439 | auto *TMA = MAM.getCachedResult<TestModuleAnalysis>(*F.getParent()); |
| 440 | |
| 441 | if (!TMA) |
| 442 | FoundModuleAnalysis1 = false; |
| 443 | |
| 444 | return PreservedAnalyses::all(); |
| 445 | })); |
| 446 | CGSCCPassManager CGPM1(/*DebugLogging*/ true); |
| 447 | CGPM1.addPass(createCGSCCToFunctionPassAdaptor(std::move(FPM1))); |
| 448 | MPM.addPass(createModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor(std::move(CGPM1))); |
| 449 | |
| 450 | // The second run checks that the module analysis got preserved the previous |
| 451 | // time and in one function fails to preserve it. |
| 452 | FunctionPassManager FPM2(/*DebugLogging*/ true); |
| 453 | // Again, start true and mark false if we ever failed to find a module analysis |
| 454 | // because we expect this to succeed for each SCC. |
| 455 | bool FoundModuleAnalysis2 = true; |
| 456 | FPM2.addPass( |
| 457 | LambdaFunctionPass([&](Function &F, FunctionAnalysisManager &AM) { |
| 458 | const auto &MAM = |
| 459 | AM.getResult<ModuleAnalysisManagerFunctionProxy>(F).getManager(); |
| 460 | auto *TMA = MAM.getCachedResult<TestModuleAnalysis>(*F.getParent()); |
| 461 | |
| 462 | if (!TMA) |
| 463 | FoundModuleAnalysis2 = false; |
| 464 | |
| 465 | // Only fail to preserve analyses on one SCC and make sure that gets |
| 466 | // propagated. |
| 467 | return F.getName() == "h2" ? PreservedAnalyses::none() |
| 468 | : PreservedAnalyses::all(); |
| 469 | })); |
| 470 | CGSCCPassManager CGPM2(/*DebugLogging*/ true); |
| 471 | CGPM2.addPass(createCGSCCToFunctionPassAdaptor(std::move(FPM2))); |
| 472 | MPM.addPass(createModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor(std::move(CGPM2))); |
| 473 | |
| 474 | // The third run should fail to find a cached module analysis as it should |
| 475 | // have been invalidated by the above run. |
| 476 | FunctionPassManager FPM3(/*DebugLogging*/ true); |
| 477 | // Start false and mark true if we ever *succeeded* to find a module |
| 478 | // analysis, as we expect this to fail for every function. |
| 479 | bool FoundModuleAnalysis3 = false; |
| 480 | FPM3.addPass( |
| 481 | LambdaFunctionPass([&](Function &F, FunctionAnalysisManager &AM) { |
| 482 | const auto &MAM = |
| 483 | AM.getResult<ModuleAnalysisManagerFunctionProxy>(F).getManager(); |
| 484 | auto *TMA = MAM.getCachedResult<TestModuleAnalysis>(*F.getParent()); |
| 485 | |
| 486 | if (TMA) |
| 487 | FoundModuleAnalysis3 = true; |
| 488 | |
| 489 | return PreservedAnalyses::none(); |
| 490 | })); |
| 491 | CGSCCPassManager CGPM3(/*DebugLogging*/ true); |
| 492 | CGPM3.addPass(createCGSCCToFunctionPassAdaptor(std::move(FPM3))); |
| 493 | MPM.addPass(createModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor(std::move(CGPM3))); |
| 494 | |
| 495 | MPM.run(*M, MAM); |
| 496 | |
| 497 | EXPECT_EQ(1, ModuleAnalysisRuns); |
| 498 | EXPECT_TRUE(FoundModuleAnalysis1); |
| 499 | EXPECT_TRUE(FoundModuleAnalysis2); |
| 500 | EXPECT_FALSE(FoundModuleAnalysis3); |
| 501 | } |
| 502 | |
| Chandler Carruth | 6b98164 | 2016-12-10 06:34:44 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 503 | // Test that a Module pass which fails to preserve an SCC analysis in fact |
| 504 | // invalidates that analysis. |
| 505 | TEST_F(CGSCCPassManagerTest, TestModulePassInvalidatesSCCAnalysis) { |
| 506 | int SCCAnalysisRuns = 0; |
| 507 | CGAM.registerPass([&] { return TestSCCAnalysis(SCCAnalysisRuns); }); |
| 508 | |
| 509 | ModulePassManager MPM(/*DebugLogging*/ true); |
| 510 | |
| 511 | // First force the analysis to be run. |
| 512 | CGSCCPassManager CGPM1(/*DebugLogging*/ true); |
| 513 | CGPM1.addPass(RequireAnalysisPass<TestSCCAnalysis, LazyCallGraph::SCC, |
| 514 | CGSCCAnalysisManager, LazyCallGraph &, |
| 515 | CGSCCUpdateResult &>()); |
| 516 | MPM.addPass(createModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor(std::move(CGPM1))); |
| 517 | |
| 518 | // Now run a module pass that preserves the LazyCallGraph and the proxy but |
| 519 | // not the SCC analysis. |
| 520 | MPM.addPass(LambdaModulePass([&](Module &M, ModuleAnalysisManager &) { |
| 521 | PreservedAnalyses PA; |
| 522 | PA.preserve<LazyCallGraphAnalysis>(); |
| 523 | PA.preserve<CGSCCAnalysisManagerModuleProxy>(); |
| 524 | PA.preserve<FunctionAnalysisManagerModuleProxy>(); |
| 525 | return PA; |
| 526 | })); |
| 527 | |
| 528 | // And now a second CGSCC run which requires the SCC analysis again. This |
| 529 | // will trigger re-running it. |
| 530 | CGSCCPassManager CGPM2(/*DebugLogging*/ true); |
| 531 | CGPM2.addPass(RequireAnalysisPass<TestSCCAnalysis, LazyCallGraph::SCC, |
| 532 | CGSCCAnalysisManager, LazyCallGraph &, |
| 533 | CGSCCUpdateResult &>()); |
| 534 | MPM.addPass(createModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor(std::move(CGPM2))); |
| 535 | |
| 536 | MPM.run(*M, MAM); |
| 537 | // Two runs and four SCCs. |
| 538 | EXPECT_EQ(2 * 4, SCCAnalysisRuns); |
| 539 | } |
| 540 | |
| 541 | // Check that marking the SCC analysis preserved is sufficient to avoid |
| 542 | // invaliadtion. This should only run the analysis once for each SCC. |
| 543 | TEST_F(CGSCCPassManagerTest, TestModulePassCanPreserveSCCAnalysis) { |
| 544 | int SCCAnalysisRuns = 0; |
| 545 | CGAM.registerPass([&] { return TestSCCAnalysis(SCCAnalysisRuns); }); |
| 546 | |
| 547 | ModulePassManager MPM(/*DebugLogging*/ true); |
| 548 | |
| 549 | // First force the analysis to be run. |
| 550 | CGSCCPassManager CGPM1(/*DebugLogging*/ true); |
| 551 | CGPM1.addPass(RequireAnalysisPass<TestSCCAnalysis, LazyCallGraph::SCC, |
| 552 | CGSCCAnalysisManager, LazyCallGraph &, |
| 553 | CGSCCUpdateResult &>()); |
| 554 | MPM.addPass(createModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor(std::move(CGPM1))); |
| 555 | |
| 556 | // Now run a module pass that preserves each of the necessary components |
| 557 | // (but not everything). |
| 558 | MPM.addPass(LambdaModulePass([&](Module &M, ModuleAnalysisManager &) { |
| 559 | PreservedAnalyses PA; |
| 560 | PA.preserve<LazyCallGraphAnalysis>(); |
| 561 | PA.preserve<CGSCCAnalysisManagerModuleProxy>(); |
| 562 | PA.preserve<FunctionAnalysisManagerModuleProxy>(); |
| 563 | PA.preserve<TestSCCAnalysis>(); |
| 564 | return PA; |
| 565 | })); |
| 566 | |
| 567 | // And now a second CGSCC run which requires the SCC analysis again but find |
| 568 | // it in the cache. |
| 569 | CGSCCPassManager CGPM2(/*DebugLogging*/ true); |
| 570 | CGPM2.addPass(RequireAnalysisPass<TestSCCAnalysis, LazyCallGraph::SCC, |
| 571 | CGSCCAnalysisManager, LazyCallGraph &, |
| 572 | CGSCCUpdateResult &>()); |
| 573 | MPM.addPass(createModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor(std::move(CGPM2))); |
| 574 | |
| 575 | MPM.run(*M, MAM); |
| 576 | // Four SCCs |
| 577 | EXPECT_EQ(4, SCCAnalysisRuns); |
| 578 | } |
| 579 | |
| 580 | // Check that even when the analysis is preserved, if the SCC information isn't |
| 581 | // we still nuke things because the SCC keys could change. |
| 582 | TEST_F(CGSCCPassManagerTest, TestModulePassInvalidatesSCCAnalysisOnCGChange) { |
| 583 | int SCCAnalysisRuns = 0; |
| 584 | CGAM.registerPass([&] { return TestSCCAnalysis(SCCAnalysisRuns); }); |
| 585 | |
| 586 | ModulePassManager MPM(/*DebugLogging*/ true); |
| 587 | |
| 588 | // First force the analysis to be run. |
| 589 | CGSCCPassManager CGPM1(/*DebugLogging*/ true); |
| 590 | CGPM1.addPass(RequireAnalysisPass<TestSCCAnalysis, LazyCallGraph::SCC, |
| 591 | CGSCCAnalysisManager, LazyCallGraph &, |
| 592 | CGSCCUpdateResult &>()); |
| 593 | MPM.addPass(createModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor(std::move(CGPM1))); |
| 594 | |
| 595 | // Now run a module pass that preserves the analysis but not the call |
| 596 | // graph or proxy. |
| 597 | MPM.addPass(LambdaModulePass([&](Module &M, ModuleAnalysisManager &) { |
| 598 | PreservedAnalyses PA; |
| 599 | PA.preserve<TestSCCAnalysis>(); |
| 600 | return PA; |
| 601 | })); |
| 602 | |
| 603 | // And now a second CGSCC run which requires the SCC analysis again. |
| 604 | CGSCCPassManager CGPM2(/*DebugLogging*/ true); |
| 605 | CGPM2.addPass(RequireAnalysisPass<TestSCCAnalysis, LazyCallGraph::SCC, |
| 606 | CGSCCAnalysisManager, LazyCallGraph &, |
| 607 | CGSCCUpdateResult &>()); |
| 608 | MPM.addPass(createModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor(std::move(CGPM2))); |
| 609 | |
| 610 | MPM.run(*M, MAM); |
| 611 | // Two runs and four SCCs. |
| 612 | EXPECT_EQ(2 * 4, SCCAnalysisRuns); |
| 613 | } |
| 614 | |
| 615 | // Test that an SCC pass which fails to preserve a Function analysis in fact |
| 616 | // invalidates that analysis. |
| 617 | TEST_F(CGSCCPassManagerTest, TestSCCPassInvalidatesFunctionAnalysis) { |
| 618 | int FunctionAnalysisRuns = 0; |
| 619 | FAM.registerPass([&] { return TestFunctionAnalysis(FunctionAnalysisRuns); }); |
| 620 | |
| 621 | // Create a very simple module with a single function and SCC to make testing |
| 622 | // these issues much easier. |
| 623 | std::unique_ptr<Module> M = parseIR("declare void @g()\n" |
| 624 | "declare void @h()\n" |
| 625 | "define void @f() {\n" |
| 626 | "entry:\n" |
| 627 | " call void @g()\n" |
| 628 | " call void @h()\n" |
| 629 | " ret void\n" |
| 630 | "}\n"); |
| 631 | |
| 632 | CGSCCPassManager CGPM(/*DebugLogging*/ true); |
| 633 | |
| 634 | // First force the analysis to be run. |
| 635 | FunctionPassManager FPM1(/*DebugLogging*/ true); |
| 636 | FPM1.addPass(RequireAnalysisPass<TestFunctionAnalysis, Function>()); |
| 637 | CGPM.addPass(createCGSCCToFunctionPassAdaptor(std::move(FPM1))); |
| 638 | |
| 639 | // Now run a module pass that preserves the LazyCallGraph and proxy but not |
| 640 | // the SCC analysis. |
| 641 | CGPM.addPass(LambdaSCCPass([&](LazyCallGraph::SCC &C, CGSCCAnalysisManager &, |
| 642 | LazyCallGraph &, CGSCCUpdateResult &) { |
| 643 | PreservedAnalyses PA; |
| 644 | PA.preserve<LazyCallGraphAnalysis>(); |
| 645 | return PA; |
| 646 | })); |
| 647 | |
| 648 | // And now a second CGSCC run which requires the SCC analysis again. This |
| 649 | // will trigger re-running it. |
| 650 | FunctionPassManager FPM2(/*DebugLogging*/ true); |
| 651 | FPM2.addPass(RequireAnalysisPass<TestFunctionAnalysis, Function>()); |
| 652 | CGPM.addPass(createCGSCCToFunctionPassAdaptor(std::move(FPM2))); |
| 653 | |
| 654 | ModulePassManager MPM(/*DebugLogging*/ true); |
| 655 | MPM.addPass(createModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor(std::move(CGPM))); |
| 656 | MPM.run(*M, MAM); |
| 657 | EXPECT_EQ(2, FunctionAnalysisRuns); |
| 658 | } |
| 659 | |
| 660 | // Check that marking the SCC analysis preserved is sufficient. This should |
| 661 | // only run the analysis once the SCC. |
| 662 | TEST_F(CGSCCPassManagerTest, TestSCCPassCanPreserveFunctionAnalysis) { |
| 663 | int FunctionAnalysisRuns = 0; |
| 664 | FAM.registerPass([&] { return TestFunctionAnalysis(FunctionAnalysisRuns); }); |
| 665 | |
| 666 | // Create a very simple module with a single function and SCC to make testing |
| 667 | // these issues much easier. |
| 668 | std::unique_ptr<Module> M = parseIR("declare void @g()\n" |
| 669 | "declare void @h()\n" |
| 670 | "define void @f() {\n" |
| 671 | "entry:\n" |
| 672 | " call void @g()\n" |
| 673 | " call void @h()\n" |
| 674 | " ret void\n" |
| 675 | "}\n"); |
| 676 | |
| 677 | CGSCCPassManager CGPM(/*DebugLogging*/ true); |
| 678 | |
| 679 | // First force the analysis to be run. |
| 680 | FunctionPassManager FPM1(/*DebugLogging*/ true); |
| 681 | FPM1.addPass(RequireAnalysisPass<TestFunctionAnalysis, Function>()); |
| 682 | CGPM.addPass(createCGSCCToFunctionPassAdaptor(std::move(FPM1))); |
| 683 | |
| 684 | // Now run a module pass that preserves each of the necessary components |
| 685 | // (but |
| 686 | // not everything). |
| 687 | CGPM.addPass(LambdaSCCPass([&](LazyCallGraph::SCC &C, CGSCCAnalysisManager &, |
| 688 | LazyCallGraph &, CGSCCUpdateResult &) { |
| 689 | PreservedAnalyses PA; |
| 690 | PA.preserve<LazyCallGraphAnalysis>(); |
| Chandler Carruth | bd9c290 | 2017-07-09 03:59:31 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 691 | PA.preserve<FunctionAnalysisManagerCGSCCProxy>(); |
| Chandler Carruth | 6b98164 | 2016-12-10 06:34:44 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 692 | PA.preserve<TestFunctionAnalysis>(); |
| 693 | return PA; |
| 694 | })); |
| 695 | |
| 696 | // And now a second CGSCC run which requires the SCC analysis again but find |
| 697 | // it in the cache. |
| 698 | FunctionPassManager FPM2(/*DebugLogging*/ true); |
| 699 | FPM2.addPass(RequireAnalysisPass<TestFunctionAnalysis, Function>()); |
| 700 | CGPM.addPass(createCGSCCToFunctionPassAdaptor(std::move(FPM2))); |
| 701 | |
| 702 | ModulePassManager MPM(/*DebugLogging*/ true); |
| 703 | MPM.addPass(createModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor(std::move(CGPM))); |
| 704 | MPM.run(*M, MAM); |
| 705 | EXPECT_EQ(1, FunctionAnalysisRuns); |
| 706 | } |
| 707 | |
| 708 | // Note that there is no test for invalidating the call graph or other |
| 709 | // structure with an SCC pass because there is no mechanism to do that from |
| 710 | // withinsuch a pass. Instead, such a pass has to directly update the call |
| 711 | // graph structure. |
| 712 | |
| 713 | // Test that a madule pass invalidates function analyses when the CGSCC proxies |
| 714 | // and pass manager. |
| 715 | TEST_F(CGSCCPassManagerTest, |
| 716 | TestModulePassInvalidatesFunctionAnalysisNestedInCGSCC) { |
| 717 | MAM.registerPass([&] { return LazyCallGraphAnalysis(); }); |
| 718 | |
| 719 | int FunctionAnalysisRuns = 0; |
| 720 | FAM.registerPass([&] { return TestFunctionAnalysis(FunctionAnalysisRuns); }); |
| 721 | |
| 722 | ModulePassManager MPM(/*DebugLogging*/ true); |
| 723 | |
| 724 | // First force the analysis to be run. |
| 725 | FunctionPassManager FPM1(/*DebugLogging*/ true); |
| 726 | FPM1.addPass(RequireAnalysisPass<TestFunctionAnalysis, Function>()); |
| 727 | CGSCCPassManager CGPM1(/*DebugLogging*/ true); |
| 728 | CGPM1.addPass(createCGSCCToFunctionPassAdaptor(std::move(FPM1))); |
| 729 | MPM.addPass(createModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor(std::move(CGPM1))); |
| 730 | |
| Chandler Carruth | bd9c290 | 2017-07-09 03:59:31 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 731 | // Now run a module pass that preserves the LazyCallGraph and proxies but not |
| Chandler Carruth | 6b98164 | 2016-12-10 06:34:44 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 732 | // the Function analysis. |
| 733 | MPM.addPass(LambdaModulePass([&](Module &M, ModuleAnalysisManager &) { |
| 734 | PreservedAnalyses PA; |
| 735 | PA.preserve<LazyCallGraphAnalysis>(); |
| 736 | PA.preserve<CGSCCAnalysisManagerModuleProxy>(); |
| Chandler Carruth | bd9c290 | 2017-07-09 03:59:31 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 737 | PA.preserve<FunctionAnalysisManagerCGSCCProxy>(); |
| 738 | PA.preserve<FunctionAnalysisManagerModuleProxy>(); |
| Chandler Carruth | 6b98164 | 2016-12-10 06:34:44 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 739 | return PA; |
| 740 | })); |
| 741 | |
| 742 | // And now a second CGSCC run which requires the SCC analysis again. This |
| 743 | // will trigger re-running it. |
| 744 | FunctionPassManager FPM2(/*DebugLogging*/ true); |
| 745 | FPM2.addPass(RequireAnalysisPass<TestFunctionAnalysis, Function>()); |
| 746 | CGSCCPassManager CGPM2(/*DebugLogging*/ true); |
| 747 | CGPM2.addPass(createCGSCCToFunctionPassAdaptor(std::move(FPM2))); |
| 748 | MPM.addPass(createModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor(std::move(CGPM2))); |
| 749 | |
| 750 | MPM.run(*M, MAM); |
| 751 | // Two runs and 6 functions. |
| 752 | EXPECT_EQ(2 * 6, FunctionAnalysisRuns); |
| 753 | } |
| 754 | |
| Chandler Carruth | bd9c290 | 2017-07-09 03:59:31 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 755 | // Check that by marking the function pass and proxies as preserved, this |
| Chandler Carruth | 6b98164 | 2016-12-10 06:34:44 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 756 | // propagates all the way through. |
| 757 | TEST_F(CGSCCPassManagerTest, |
| 758 | TestModulePassCanPreserveFunctionAnalysisNestedInCGSCC) { |
| 759 | MAM.registerPass([&] { return LazyCallGraphAnalysis(); }); |
| 760 | |
| 761 | int FunctionAnalysisRuns = 0; |
| 762 | FAM.registerPass([&] { return TestFunctionAnalysis(FunctionAnalysisRuns); }); |
| 763 | |
| 764 | ModulePassManager MPM(/*DebugLogging*/ true); |
| 765 | |
| 766 | // First force the analysis to be run. |
| 767 | FunctionPassManager FPM1(/*DebugLogging*/ true); |
| 768 | FPM1.addPass(RequireAnalysisPass<TestFunctionAnalysis, Function>()); |
| 769 | CGSCCPassManager CGPM1(/*DebugLogging*/ true); |
| 770 | CGPM1.addPass(createCGSCCToFunctionPassAdaptor(std::move(FPM1))); |
| 771 | MPM.addPass(createModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor(std::move(CGPM1))); |
| 772 | |
| 773 | // Now run a module pass that preserves the LazyCallGraph, the proxy, and |
| 774 | // the Function analysis. |
| 775 | MPM.addPass(LambdaModulePass([&](Module &M, ModuleAnalysisManager &) { |
| 776 | PreservedAnalyses PA; |
| 777 | PA.preserve<LazyCallGraphAnalysis>(); |
| 778 | PA.preserve<CGSCCAnalysisManagerModuleProxy>(); |
| Chandler Carruth | bd9c290 | 2017-07-09 03:59:31 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 779 | PA.preserve<FunctionAnalysisManagerCGSCCProxy>(); |
| Chandler Carruth | 6b98164 | 2016-12-10 06:34:44 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 780 | PA.preserve<FunctionAnalysisManagerModuleProxy>(); |
| 781 | PA.preserve<TestFunctionAnalysis>(); |
| 782 | return PA; |
| 783 | })); |
| 784 | |
| 785 | // And now a second CGSCC run which requires the SCC analysis again. This |
| 786 | // will trigger re-running it. |
| 787 | FunctionPassManager FPM2(/*DebugLogging*/ true); |
| 788 | FPM2.addPass(RequireAnalysisPass<TestFunctionAnalysis, Function>()); |
| 789 | CGSCCPassManager CGPM2(/*DebugLogging*/ true); |
| 790 | CGPM2.addPass(createCGSCCToFunctionPassAdaptor(std::move(FPM2))); |
| 791 | MPM.addPass(createModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor(std::move(CGPM2))); |
| 792 | |
| 793 | MPM.run(*M, MAM); |
| 794 | // One run and 6 functions. |
| 795 | EXPECT_EQ(6, FunctionAnalysisRuns); |
| 796 | } |
| 797 | |
| 798 | // Check that if the lazy call graph itself isn't preserved we still manage to |
| 799 | // invalidate everything. |
| 800 | TEST_F(CGSCCPassManagerTest, |
| 801 | TestModulePassInvalidatesFunctionAnalysisNestedInCGSCCOnCGChange) { |
| 802 | MAM.registerPass([&] { return LazyCallGraphAnalysis(); }); |
| 803 | |
| 804 | int FunctionAnalysisRuns = 0; |
| 805 | FAM.registerPass([&] { return TestFunctionAnalysis(FunctionAnalysisRuns); }); |
| 806 | |
| 807 | ModulePassManager MPM(/*DebugLogging*/ true); |
| 808 | |
| 809 | // First force the analysis to be run. |
| 810 | FunctionPassManager FPM1(/*DebugLogging*/ true); |
| 811 | FPM1.addPass(RequireAnalysisPass<TestFunctionAnalysis, Function>()); |
| 812 | CGSCCPassManager CGPM1(/*DebugLogging*/ true); |
| 813 | CGPM1.addPass(createCGSCCToFunctionPassAdaptor(std::move(FPM1))); |
| 814 | MPM.addPass(createModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor(std::move(CGPM1))); |
| 815 | |
| 816 | // Now run a module pass that preserves the LazyCallGraph but not the |
| 817 | // Function analysis. |
| 818 | MPM.addPass(LambdaModulePass([&](Module &M, ModuleAnalysisManager &) { |
| 819 | PreservedAnalyses PA; |
| 820 | return PA; |
| 821 | })); |
| 822 | |
| 823 | // And now a second CGSCC run which requires the SCC analysis again. This |
| 824 | // will trigger re-running it. |
| 825 | FunctionPassManager FPM2(/*DebugLogging*/ true); |
| 826 | FPM2.addPass(RequireAnalysisPass<TestFunctionAnalysis, Function>()); |
| 827 | CGSCCPassManager CGPM2(/*DebugLogging*/ true); |
| 828 | CGPM2.addPass(createCGSCCToFunctionPassAdaptor(std::move(FPM2))); |
| 829 | MPM.addPass(createModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor(std::move(CGPM2))); |
| 830 | |
| 831 | MPM.run(*M, MAM); |
| 832 | // Two runs and 6 functions. |
| 833 | EXPECT_EQ(2 * 6, FunctionAnalysisRuns); |
| 834 | } |
| Chandler Carruth | ba90ae9 | 2016-12-27 08:40:39 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 835 | |
| 836 | /// A test CGSCC-level analysis pass which caches in its result another |
| 837 | /// analysis pass and uses it to serve queries. This requires the result to |
| 838 | /// invalidate itself when its dependency is invalidated. |
| 839 | /// |
| 840 | /// FIXME: Currently this doesn't also depend on a function analysis, and if it |
| 841 | /// did we would fail to invalidate it correctly. |
| 842 | struct TestIndirectSCCAnalysis |
| 843 | : public AnalysisInfoMixin<TestIndirectSCCAnalysis> { |
| 844 | struct Result { |
| 845 | Result(TestSCCAnalysis::Result &SCCDep, TestModuleAnalysis::Result &MDep) |
| 846 | : SCCDep(SCCDep), MDep(MDep) {} |
| 847 | TestSCCAnalysis::Result &SCCDep; |
| 848 | TestModuleAnalysis::Result &MDep; |
| 849 | |
| 850 | bool invalidate(LazyCallGraph::SCC &C, const PreservedAnalyses &PA, |
| 851 | CGSCCAnalysisManager::Invalidator &Inv) { |
| 852 | auto PAC = PA.getChecker<TestIndirectSCCAnalysis>(); |
| 853 | return !(PAC.preserved() || |
| 854 | PAC.preservedSet<AllAnalysesOn<LazyCallGraph::SCC>>()) || |
| 855 | Inv.invalidate<TestSCCAnalysis>(C, PA); |
| 856 | } |
| 857 | }; |
| 858 | |
| 859 | TestIndirectSCCAnalysis(int &Runs) : Runs(Runs) {} |
| 860 | |
| 861 | /// Run the analysis pass over the function and return a result. |
| 862 | Result run(LazyCallGraph::SCC &C, CGSCCAnalysisManager &AM, |
| 863 | LazyCallGraph &CG) { |
| 864 | ++Runs; |
| 865 | auto &SCCDep = AM.getResult<TestSCCAnalysis>(C, CG); |
| 866 | |
| 867 | auto &ModuleProxy = AM.getResult<ModuleAnalysisManagerCGSCCProxy>(C, CG); |
| 868 | const ModuleAnalysisManager &MAM = ModuleProxy.getManager(); |
| 869 | // For the test, we insist that the module analysis starts off in the |
| 870 | // cache. |
| 871 | auto &MDep = *MAM.getCachedResult<TestModuleAnalysis>( |
| 872 | *C.begin()->getFunction().getParent()); |
| 873 | // Register the dependency as module analysis dependencies have to be |
| 874 | // pre-registered on the proxy. |
| 875 | ModuleProxy.registerOuterAnalysisInvalidation<TestModuleAnalysis, |
| 876 | TestIndirectSCCAnalysis>(); |
| 877 | |
| 878 | return Result(SCCDep, MDep); |
| 879 | } |
| 880 | |
| 881 | private: |
| 882 | friend AnalysisInfoMixin<TestIndirectSCCAnalysis>; |
| 883 | static AnalysisKey Key; |
| 884 | |
| 885 | int &Runs; |
| 886 | }; |
| 887 | |
| 888 | AnalysisKey TestIndirectSCCAnalysis::Key; |
| 889 | |
| 890 | /// A test analysis pass which caches in its result the result from the above |
| 891 | /// indirect analysis pass. |
| 892 | /// |
| 893 | /// This allows us to ensure that whenever an analysis pass is invalidated due |
| 894 | /// to dependencies (especially dependencies across IR units that trigger |
| 895 | /// asynchronous invalidation) we correctly detect that this may in turn cause |
| 896 | /// other analysis to be invalidated. |
| 897 | struct TestDoublyIndirectSCCAnalysis |
| 898 | : public AnalysisInfoMixin<TestDoublyIndirectSCCAnalysis> { |
| 899 | struct Result { |
| 900 | Result(TestIndirectSCCAnalysis::Result &IDep) : IDep(IDep) {} |
| 901 | TestIndirectSCCAnalysis::Result &IDep; |
| 902 | |
| 903 | bool invalidate(LazyCallGraph::SCC &C, const PreservedAnalyses &PA, |
| 904 | CGSCCAnalysisManager::Invalidator &Inv) { |
| 905 | auto PAC = PA.getChecker<TestDoublyIndirectSCCAnalysis>(); |
| 906 | return !(PAC.preserved() || |
| 907 | PAC.preservedSet<AllAnalysesOn<LazyCallGraph::SCC>>()) || |
| 908 | Inv.invalidate<TestIndirectSCCAnalysis>(C, PA); |
| 909 | } |
| 910 | }; |
| 911 | |
| 912 | TestDoublyIndirectSCCAnalysis(int &Runs) : Runs(Runs) {} |
| 913 | |
| 914 | /// Run the analysis pass over the function and return a result. |
| 915 | Result run(LazyCallGraph::SCC &C, CGSCCAnalysisManager &AM, |
| 916 | LazyCallGraph &CG) { |
| 917 | ++Runs; |
| 918 | auto &IDep = AM.getResult<TestIndirectSCCAnalysis>(C, CG); |
| 919 | return Result(IDep); |
| 920 | } |
| 921 | |
| 922 | private: |
| 923 | friend AnalysisInfoMixin<TestDoublyIndirectSCCAnalysis>; |
| 924 | static AnalysisKey Key; |
| 925 | |
| 926 | int &Runs; |
| 927 | }; |
| 928 | |
| 929 | AnalysisKey TestDoublyIndirectSCCAnalysis::Key; |
| 930 | |
| 931 | /// A test analysis pass which caches results from three different IR unit |
| 932 | /// layers and requires intermediate layers to correctly propagate the entire |
| 933 | /// distance. |
| 934 | struct TestIndirectFunctionAnalysis |
| 935 | : public AnalysisInfoMixin<TestIndirectFunctionAnalysis> { |
| 936 | struct Result { |
| 937 | Result(TestFunctionAnalysis::Result &FDep, TestModuleAnalysis::Result &MDep, |
| 938 | TestSCCAnalysis::Result &SCCDep) |
| 939 | : FDep(FDep), MDep(MDep), SCCDep(SCCDep) {} |
| 940 | TestFunctionAnalysis::Result &FDep; |
| 941 | TestModuleAnalysis::Result &MDep; |
| 942 | TestSCCAnalysis::Result &SCCDep; |
| 943 | |
| 944 | bool invalidate(Function &F, const PreservedAnalyses &PA, |
| 945 | FunctionAnalysisManager::Invalidator &Inv) { |
| 946 | auto PAC = PA.getChecker<TestIndirectFunctionAnalysis>(); |
| 947 | return !(PAC.preserved() || |
| 948 | PAC.preservedSet<AllAnalysesOn<Function>>()) || |
| 949 | Inv.invalidate<TestFunctionAnalysis>(F, PA); |
| 950 | } |
| 951 | }; |
| 952 | |
| 953 | TestIndirectFunctionAnalysis(int &Runs) : Runs(Runs) {} |
| 954 | |
| 955 | /// Run the analysis pass over the function and return a result. |
| 956 | Result run(Function &F, FunctionAnalysisManager &AM) { |
| 957 | ++Runs; |
| 958 | auto &FDep = AM.getResult<TestFunctionAnalysis>(F); |
| 959 | |
| 960 | auto &ModuleProxy = AM.getResult<ModuleAnalysisManagerFunctionProxy>(F); |
| 961 | const ModuleAnalysisManager &MAM = ModuleProxy.getManager(); |
| 962 | // For the test, we insist that the module analysis starts off in the |
| 963 | // cache. |
| 964 | auto &MDep = *MAM.getCachedResult<TestModuleAnalysis>(*F.getParent()); |
| 965 | // Register the dependency as module analysis dependencies have to be |
| 966 | // pre-registered on the proxy. |
| 967 | ModuleProxy.registerOuterAnalysisInvalidation< |
| 968 | TestModuleAnalysis, TestIndirectFunctionAnalysis>(); |
| 969 | |
| 970 | // For thet test we assume this is run inside a CGSCC pass manager. |
| 971 | const LazyCallGraph &CG = |
| 972 | *MAM.getCachedResult<LazyCallGraphAnalysis>(*F.getParent()); |
| 973 | auto &CGSCCProxy = AM.getResult<CGSCCAnalysisManagerFunctionProxy>(F); |
| 974 | const CGSCCAnalysisManager &CGAM = CGSCCProxy.getManager(); |
| 975 | // For the test, we insist that the CGSCC analysis starts off in the cache. |
| 976 | auto &SCCDep = |
| 977 | *CGAM.getCachedResult<TestSCCAnalysis>(*CG.lookupSCC(*CG.lookup(F))); |
| 978 | // Register the dependency as CGSCC analysis dependencies have to be |
| 979 | // pre-registered on the proxy. |
| 980 | CGSCCProxy.registerOuterAnalysisInvalidation< |
| 981 | TestSCCAnalysis, TestIndirectFunctionAnalysis>(); |
| 982 | |
| 983 | return Result(FDep, MDep, SCCDep); |
| 984 | } |
| 985 | |
| 986 | private: |
| 987 | friend AnalysisInfoMixin<TestIndirectFunctionAnalysis>; |
| 988 | static AnalysisKey Key; |
| 989 | |
| 990 | int &Runs; |
| 991 | }; |
| 992 | |
| 993 | AnalysisKey TestIndirectFunctionAnalysis::Key; |
| 994 | |
| 995 | TEST_F(CGSCCPassManagerTest, TestIndirectAnalysisInvalidation) { |
| 996 | int ModuleAnalysisRuns = 0; |
| 997 | MAM.registerPass([&] { return TestModuleAnalysis(ModuleAnalysisRuns); }); |
| 998 | |
| 999 | int SCCAnalysisRuns = 0, IndirectSCCAnalysisRuns = 0, |
| 1000 | DoublyIndirectSCCAnalysisRuns = 0; |
| 1001 | CGAM.registerPass([&] { return TestSCCAnalysis(SCCAnalysisRuns); }); |
| 1002 | CGAM.registerPass( |
| 1003 | [&] { return TestIndirectSCCAnalysis(IndirectSCCAnalysisRuns); }); |
| 1004 | CGAM.registerPass([&] { |
| 1005 | return TestDoublyIndirectSCCAnalysis(DoublyIndirectSCCAnalysisRuns); |
| 1006 | }); |
| 1007 | |
| 1008 | int FunctionAnalysisRuns = 0, IndirectFunctionAnalysisRuns = 0; |
| 1009 | FAM.registerPass([&] { return TestFunctionAnalysis(FunctionAnalysisRuns); }); |
| 1010 | FAM.registerPass([&] { |
| 1011 | return TestIndirectFunctionAnalysis(IndirectFunctionAnalysisRuns); |
| 1012 | }); |
| 1013 | |
| 1014 | ModulePassManager MPM(/*DebugLogging*/ true); |
| 1015 | |
| 1016 | int FunctionCount = 0; |
| 1017 | CGSCCPassManager CGPM(/*DebugLogging*/ true); |
| 1018 | // First just use the analysis to get the function count and preserve |
| 1019 | // everything. |
| 1020 | CGPM.addPass( |
| 1021 | LambdaSCCPass([&](LazyCallGraph::SCC &C, CGSCCAnalysisManager &AM, |
| 1022 | LazyCallGraph &CG, CGSCCUpdateResult &) { |
| 1023 | auto &DoublyIndirectResult = |
| 1024 | AM.getResult<TestDoublyIndirectSCCAnalysis>(C, CG); |
| 1025 | auto &IndirectResult = DoublyIndirectResult.IDep; |
| 1026 | FunctionCount += IndirectResult.SCCDep.FunctionCount; |
| 1027 | return PreservedAnalyses::all(); |
| 1028 | })); |
| Chandler Carruth | bd9c290 | 2017-07-09 03:59:31 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1029 | CGPM.addPass(createCGSCCToFunctionPassAdaptor( |
| 1030 | RequireAnalysisPass<TestIndirectFunctionAnalysis, Function>())); |
| 1031 | |
| Chandler Carruth | ba90ae9 | 2016-12-27 08:40:39 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1032 | // Next, invalidate |
| 1033 | // - both analyses for the (f) and (x) SCCs, |
| 1034 | // - just the underlying (indirect) analysis for (g) SCC, and |
| 1035 | // - just the direct analysis for (h1,h2,h3) SCC. |
| 1036 | CGPM.addPass( |
| 1037 | LambdaSCCPass([&](LazyCallGraph::SCC &C, CGSCCAnalysisManager &AM, |
| 1038 | LazyCallGraph &CG, CGSCCUpdateResult &) { |
| 1039 | auto &DoublyIndirectResult = |
| 1040 | AM.getResult<TestDoublyIndirectSCCAnalysis>(C, CG); |
| 1041 | auto &IndirectResult = DoublyIndirectResult.IDep; |
| 1042 | FunctionCount += IndirectResult.SCCDep.FunctionCount; |
| 1043 | auto PA = PreservedAnalyses::none(); |
| Chandler Carruth | bd9c290 | 2017-07-09 03:59:31 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1044 | PA.preserve<FunctionAnalysisManagerCGSCCProxy>(); |
| 1045 | PA.preserveSet<AllAnalysesOn<Function>>(); |
| Chandler Carruth | ba90ae9 | 2016-12-27 08:40:39 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1046 | if (C.getName() == "(g)") |
| 1047 | PA.preserve<TestSCCAnalysis>(); |
| 1048 | else if (C.getName() == "(h3, h1, h2)") |
| 1049 | PA.preserve<TestIndirectSCCAnalysis>(); |
| 1050 | return PA; |
| 1051 | })); |
| Chandler Carruth | bd9c290 | 2017-07-09 03:59:31 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1052 | // Finally, use the analysis again on each SCC (and function), forcing |
| 1053 | // re-computation for all of them. |
| Chandler Carruth | ba90ae9 | 2016-12-27 08:40:39 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1054 | CGPM.addPass( |
| 1055 | LambdaSCCPass([&](LazyCallGraph::SCC &C, CGSCCAnalysisManager &AM, |
| 1056 | LazyCallGraph &CG, CGSCCUpdateResult &) { |
| 1057 | auto &DoublyIndirectResult = |
| 1058 | AM.getResult<TestDoublyIndirectSCCAnalysis>(C, CG); |
| 1059 | auto &IndirectResult = DoublyIndirectResult.IDep; |
| 1060 | FunctionCount += IndirectResult.SCCDep.FunctionCount; |
| 1061 | return PreservedAnalyses::all(); |
| 1062 | })); |
| Chandler Carruth | bd9c290 | 2017-07-09 03:59:31 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1063 | CGPM.addPass(createCGSCCToFunctionPassAdaptor( |
| 1064 | RequireAnalysisPass<TestIndirectFunctionAnalysis, Function>())); |
| Chandler Carruth | ba90ae9 | 2016-12-27 08:40:39 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1065 | |
| 1066 | // Create a second CGSCC pass manager. This will cause the module-level |
| 1067 | // invalidation to occur, which will force yet another invalidation of the |
| 1068 | // indirect SCC-level analysis as the module analysis it depends on gets |
| 1069 | // invalidated. |
| 1070 | CGSCCPassManager CGPM2(/*DebugLogging*/ true); |
| 1071 | CGPM2.addPass( |
| 1072 | LambdaSCCPass([&](LazyCallGraph::SCC &C, CGSCCAnalysisManager &AM, |
| 1073 | LazyCallGraph &CG, CGSCCUpdateResult &) { |
| 1074 | auto &DoublyIndirectResult = |
| 1075 | AM.getResult<TestDoublyIndirectSCCAnalysis>(C, CG); |
| 1076 | auto &IndirectResult = DoublyIndirectResult.IDep; |
| 1077 | FunctionCount += IndirectResult.SCCDep.FunctionCount; |
| 1078 | return PreservedAnalyses::all(); |
| 1079 | })); |
| Chandler Carruth | bd9c290 | 2017-07-09 03:59:31 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1080 | CGPM2.addPass(createCGSCCToFunctionPassAdaptor( |
| 1081 | RequireAnalysisPass<TestIndirectFunctionAnalysis, Function>())); |
| Chandler Carruth | ba90ae9 | 2016-12-27 08:40:39 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1082 | |
| Chandler Carruth | bd9c290 | 2017-07-09 03:59:31 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1083 | // Add a requires pass to populate the module analysis and then our CGSCC |
| Chandler Carruth | ba90ae9 | 2016-12-27 08:40:39 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1084 | // pass pipeline. |
| 1085 | MPM.addPass(RequireAnalysisPass<TestModuleAnalysis, Module>()); |
| 1086 | MPM.addPass(createModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor(std::move(CGPM))); |
| 1087 | // Now require the module analysis again (it will have been invalidated once) |
| Chandler Carruth | bd9c290 | 2017-07-09 03:59:31 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1088 | // and then use it again from our second CGSCC pipeline.. |
| Chandler Carruth | ba90ae9 | 2016-12-27 08:40:39 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1089 | MPM.addPass(RequireAnalysisPass<TestModuleAnalysis, Module>()); |
| 1090 | MPM.addPass(createModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor(std::move(CGPM2))); |
| 1091 | MPM.run(*M, MAM); |
| 1092 | |
| 1093 | // There are generally two possible runs for each of the four SCCs. But |
| 1094 | // for one SCC, we only invalidate the indirect analysis so the base one |
| 1095 | // only gets run seven times. |
| 1096 | EXPECT_EQ(7, SCCAnalysisRuns); |
| 1097 | // The module analysis pass should be run twice here. |
| 1098 | EXPECT_EQ(2, ModuleAnalysisRuns); |
| 1099 | // The indirect analysis is invalidated (either directly or indirectly) three |
| 1100 | // times for each of four SCCs. |
| 1101 | EXPECT_EQ(3 * 4, IndirectSCCAnalysisRuns); |
| 1102 | EXPECT_EQ(3 * 4, DoublyIndirectSCCAnalysisRuns); |
| 1103 | |
| Chandler Carruth | bd9c290 | 2017-07-09 03:59:31 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1104 | // We run the indirect function analysis once per function the first time. |
| 1105 | // Then we re-run it for every SCC but "(g)". Then we re-run it for every |
| 1106 | // function again. |
| 1107 | EXPECT_EQ(6 + 5 + 6, IndirectFunctionAnalysisRuns); |
| 1108 | |
| Chandler Carruth | ba90ae9 | 2016-12-27 08:40:39 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1109 | // Four passes count each of six functions once (via SCCs). |
| 1110 | EXPECT_EQ(4 * 6, FunctionCount); |
| 1111 | } |
| Chandler Carruth | 7c8964d | 2017-07-09 13:16:55 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1112 | |
| 1113 | TEST_F(CGSCCPassManagerTest, TestAnalysisInvalidationCGSCCUpdate) { |
| 1114 | int ModuleAnalysisRuns = 0; |
| 1115 | MAM.registerPass([&] { return TestModuleAnalysis(ModuleAnalysisRuns); }); |
| 1116 | |
| 1117 | int SCCAnalysisRuns = 0, IndirectSCCAnalysisRuns = 0, |
| 1118 | DoublyIndirectSCCAnalysisRuns = 0; |
| 1119 | CGAM.registerPass([&] { return TestSCCAnalysis(SCCAnalysisRuns); }); |
| 1120 | CGAM.registerPass( |
| 1121 | [&] { return TestIndirectSCCAnalysis(IndirectSCCAnalysisRuns); }); |
| 1122 | CGAM.registerPass([&] { |
| 1123 | return TestDoublyIndirectSCCAnalysis(DoublyIndirectSCCAnalysisRuns); |
| 1124 | }); |
| 1125 | |
| 1126 | int FunctionAnalysisRuns = 0, IndirectFunctionAnalysisRuns = 0; |
| 1127 | FAM.registerPass([&] { return TestFunctionAnalysis(FunctionAnalysisRuns); }); |
| 1128 | FAM.registerPass([&] { |
| 1129 | return TestIndirectFunctionAnalysis(IndirectFunctionAnalysisRuns); |
| 1130 | }); |
| 1131 | |
| 1132 | ModulePassManager MPM(/*DebugLogging*/ true); |
| 1133 | |
| 1134 | CGSCCPassManager CGPM(/*DebugLogging*/ true); |
| 1135 | // First just use the analysis to get the function count and preserve |
| 1136 | // everything. |
| 1137 | using RequireTestIndirectFunctionAnalysisPass = |
| 1138 | RequireAnalysisPass<TestIndirectFunctionAnalysis, Function>; |
| 1139 | using RequireTestDoublyIndirectSCCAnalysisPass = |
| 1140 | RequireAnalysisPass<TestDoublyIndirectSCCAnalysis, LazyCallGraph::SCC, |
| 1141 | CGSCCAnalysisManager, LazyCallGraph &, |
| 1142 | CGSCCUpdateResult &>; |
| 1143 | CGPM.addPass(RequireTestDoublyIndirectSCCAnalysisPass()); |
| 1144 | CGPM.addPass(createCGSCCToFunctionPassAdaptor( |
| 1145 | RequireTestIndirectFunctionAnalysisPass())); |
| 1146 | |
| 1147 | // Next, we inject an SCC pass that invalidates everything for the `(h3, h1, |
| 1148 | // h2)` SCC but also deletes the call edge from `h2` to `h3` and updates the |
| 1149 | // CG. This should successfully invalidate (and force to be re-run) all the |
| 1150 | // analyses for that SCC and for the functions. |
| 1151 | CGPM.addPass( |
| 1152 | LambdaSCCPass([&](LazyCallGraph::SCC &C, CGSCCAnalysisManager &AM, |
| 1153 | LazyCallGraph &CG, CGSCCUpdateResult &UR) { |
| 1154 | (void)AM.getResult<TestDoublyIndirectSCCAnalysis>(C, CG); |
| 1155 | if (C.getName() != "(h3, h1, h2)") |
| 1156 | return PreservedAnalyses::all(); |
| 1157 | |
| 1158 | // Build the preserved set. |
| 1159 | auto PA = PreservedAnalyses::none(); |
| 1160 | PA.preserve<FunctionAnalysisManagerCGSCCProxy>(); |
| 1161 | PA.preserve<TestIndirectSCCAnalysis>(); |
| 1162 | PA.preserve<TestDoublyIndirectSCCAnalysis>(); |
| 1163 | |
| 1164 | // Delete the call from `h2` to `h3`. |
| 1165 | auto &H2N = *llvm::find_if( |
| 1166 | C, [](LazyCallGraph::Node &N) { return N.getName() == "h2"; }); |
| 1167 | auto &H2F = H2N.getFunction(); |
| 1168 | auto &H3F = *cast<CallInst>(H2F.begin()->begin())->getCalledFunction(); |
| 1169 | assert(H3F.getName() == "h3" && "Wrong called function!"); |
| 1170 | H2F.begin()->begin()->eraseFromParent(); |
| 1171 | // Insert a bitcast of `h3` so that we retain a ref edge to it. |
| 1172 | (void)CastInst::CreatePointerCast(&H3F, |
| 1173 | Type::getInt8PtrTy(H2F.getContext()), |
| 1174 | "dummy", &*H2F.begin()->begin()); |
| 1175 | |
| 1176 | // Now update the call graph. |
| Chandler Carruth | 19913b2 | 2017-08-11 05:47:13 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1177 | auto &NewC = |
| 1178 | updateCGAndAnalysisManagerForFunctionPass(CG, C, H2N, AM, UR); |
| Chandler Carruth | 7c8964d | 2017-07-09 13:16:55 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1179 | assert(&NewC != &C && "Should get a new SCC due to update!"); |
| NAKAMURA Takumi | 3733fc4 | 2017-07-09 23:06:05 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1180 | (void)&NewC; |
| Chandler Carruth | 7c8964d | 2017-07-09 13:16:55 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1181 | |
| 1182 | return PA; |
| 1183 | })); |
| 1184 | // Now use the analysis again on each SCC and function, forcing |
| 1185 | // re-computation for all of them. |
| 1186 | CGPM.addPass(RequireTestDoublyIndirectSCCAnalysisPass()); |
| 1187 | CGPM.addPass(createCGSCCToFunctionPassAdaptor( |
| 1188 | RequireTestIndirectFunctionAnalysisPass())); |
| 1189 | |
| 1190 | // Create another CGSCC pipeline that requires all the analyses again. |
| 1191 | CGSCCPassManager CGPM2(/*DebugLogging*/ true); |
| 1192 | CGPM2.addPass(RequireTestDoublyIndirectSCCAnalysisPass()); |
| 1193 | CGPM2.addPass(createCGSCCToFunctionPassAdaptor( |
| 1194 | RequireTestIndirectFunctionAnalysisPass())); |
| 1195 | |
| 1196 | // Next we inject an SCC pass that finds the `(h2)` SCC, adds a call to `h3` |
| 1197 | // back to `h2`, and then invalidates everything for what will then be the |
| 1198 | // `(h3, h1, h2)` SCC again. |
| 1199 | CGSCCPassManager CGPM3(/*DebugLogging*/ true); |
| 1200 | CGPM3.addPass( |
| 1201 | LambdaSCCPass([&](LazyCallGraph::SCC &C, CGSCCAnalysisManager &AM, |
| 1202 | LazyCallGraph &CG, CGSCCUpdateResult &UR) { |
| 1203 | (void)AM.getResult<TestDoublyIndirectSCCAnalysis>(C, CG); |
| 1204 | if (C.getName() != "(h2)") |
| 1205 | return PreservedAnalyses::all(); |
| 1206 | |
| 1207 | // Build the preserved set. |
| 1208 | auto PA = PreservedAnalyses::none(); |
| 1209 | PA.preserve<FunctionAnalysisManagerCGSCCProxy>(); |
| 1210 | PA.preserve<TestIndirectSCCAnalysis>(); |
| 1211 | PA.preserve<TestDoublyIndirectSCCAnalysis>(); |
| 1212 | |
| 1213 | // Delete the bitcast of `h3` that we added earlier. |
| 1214 | auto &H2N = *C.begin(); |
| 1215 | auto &H2F = H2N.getFunction(); |
| 1216 | auto &H3F = *cast<Function>(cast<BitCastInst>(H2F.begin()->begin())->getOperand(0)); |
| 1217 | assert(H3F.getName() == "h3" && "Wrong called function!"); |
| 1218 | H2F.begin()->begin()->eraseFromParent(); |
| 1219 | // And insert a call to `h3`. |
| 1220 | (void)CallInst::Create(&H3F, {}, "", &*H2F.begin()->begin()); |
| 1221 | |
| 1222 | // Now update the call graph. |
| Chandler Carruth | 19913b2 | 2017-08-11 05:47:13 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1223 | auto &NewC = |
| 1224 | updateCGAndAnalysisManagerForFunctionPass(CG, C, H2N, AM, UR); |
| Chandler Carruth | 7c8964d | 2017-07-09 13:16:55 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1225 | assert(&NewC != &C && "Should get a new SCC due to update!"); |
| NAKAMURA Takumi | 3733fc4 | 2017-07-09 23:06:05 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1226 | (void)&NewC; |
| Chandler Carruth | 7c8964d | 2017-07-09 13:16:55 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1227 | |
| 1228 | return PA; |
| 1229 | })); |
| 1230 | // Now use the analysis again on each SCC and function, forcing |
| 1231 | // re-computation for all of them. |
| 1232 | CGPM3.addPass(RequireTestDoublyIndirectSCCAnalysisPass()); |
| 1233 | CGPM3.addPass(createCGSCCToFunctionPassAdaptor( |
| 1234 | RequireTestIndirectFunctionAnalysisPass())); |
| 1235 | |
| 1236 | // Create a second CGSCC pass manager. This will cause the module-level |
| 1237 | // invalidation to occur, which will force yet another invalidation of the |
| 1238 | // indirect SCC-level analysis as the module analysis it depends on gets |
| 1239 | // invalidated. |
| 1240 | CGSCCPassManager CGPM4(/*DebugLogging*/ true); |
| 1241 | CGPM4.addPass(RequireTestDoublyIndirectSCCAnalysisPass()); |
| 1242 | CGPM4.addPass(createCGSCCToFunctionPassAdaptor( |
| 1243 | RequireTestIndirectFunctionAnalysisPass())); |
| 1244 | |
| 1245 | // Add a requires pass to populate the module analysis and then one of our |
| 1246 | // CGSCC pipelines. Repeat for all four CGSCC pipelines. |
| 1247 | MPM.addPass(RequireAnalysisPass<TestModuleAnalysis, Module>()); |
| 1248 | MPM.addPass(createModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor(std::move(CGPM))); |
| 1249 | MPM.addPass(RequireAnalysisPass<TestModuleAnalysis, Module>()); |
| 1250 | MPM.addPass(createModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor(std::move(CGPM2))); |
| 1251 | MPM.addPass(RequireAnalysisPass<TestModuleAnalysis, Module>()); |
| 1252 | MPM.addPass(createModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor(std::move(CGPM3))); |
| 1253 | MPM.addPass(RequireAnalysisPass<TestModuleAnalysis, Module>()); |
| 1254 | MPM.addPass(createModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor(std::move(CGPM4))); |
| 1255 | MPM.run(*M, MAM); |
| 1256 | |
| 1257 | // We run over four SCCs the first time. But then we split an SCC into three. |
| Chandler Carruth | 923ff55 | 2019-03-28 00:51:36 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1258 | // And then we merge those three back into one. However, this also |
| 1259 | // invalidates all three SCCs further down in the PO walk. |
| 1260 | EXPECT_EQ(4 + 3 + 1 + 3, SCCAnalysisRuns); |
| Chandler Carruth | 7c8964d | 2017-07-09 13:16:55 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1261 | // The module analysis pass should be run three times. |
| 1262 | EXPECT_EQ(3, ModuleAnalysisRuns); |
| 1263 | // We run over four SCCs the first time. Then over the two new ones. Then the |
| 1264 | // entire module is invalidated causing a full run over all seven. Then we |
| Chandler Carruth | 923ff55 | 2019-03-28 00:51:36 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1265 | // fold three SCCs back to one, re-compute for it and the two SCCs above it |
| 1266 | // in the graph, and then run over the whole module again. |
| 1267 | EXPECT_EQ(4 + 2 + 7 + 1 + 3 + 4, IndirectSCCAnalysisRuns); |
| 1268 | EXPECT_EQ(4 + 2 + 7 + 1 + 3 + 4, DoublyIndirectSCCAnalysisRuns); |
| Chandler Carruth | 7c8964d | 2017-07-09 13:16:55 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1269 | |
| 1270 | // First we run over all six functions. Then we re-run it over three when we |
| 1271 | // split their SCCs. Then we re-run over the whole module. Then we re-run |
| Chandler Carruth | 923ff55 | 2019-03-28 00:51:36 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1272 | // over three functions merged back into a single SCC, then those three |
| 1273 | // functions again, the two functions in SCCs above it in the graph, and then |
| 1274 | // over the whole module again. |
| 1275 | EXPECT_EQ(6 + 3 + 6 + 3 + 3 + 2 + 6, FunctionAnalysisRuns); |
| Chandler Carruth | 7c8964d | 2017-07-09 13:16:55 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1276 | |
| Chandler Carruth | 051bdb0 | 2017-07-12 09:08:11 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1277 | // Re run the function analysis over the entire module, and then re-run it |
| 1278 | // over the `(h3, h1, h2)` SCC due to invalidation. Then we re-run it over |
| 1279 | // the entire module, then the three functions merged back into a single SCC, |
| Chandler Carruth | 923ff55 | 2019-03-28 00:51:36 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1280 | // those three functions again, then the two functions in SCCs above it in |
| 1281 | // the graph, and then over the whole module. |
| 1282 | EXPECT_EQ(6 + 3 + 6 + 3 + 3 + 2 + 6, IndirectFunctionAnalysisRuns); |
| Chandler Carruth | 7c8964d | 2017-07-09 13:16:55 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1283 | } |
| Chandler Carruth | 7431992 | 2016-02-23 10:02:02 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1284 | } |