blob: bf165c9edc6e654c8e34f3c43435e618dbad4fa0 [file] [log] [blame]
Hal Finkel8340de12015-05-18 06:25:59 +00001//===-- PPCTOCRegDeps.cpp - Add Extra TOC Register Dependencies -----------===//
2//
3// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
4//
5// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
6// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
7//
8//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
9//
10// When resolving an address using the ELF ABI TOC pointer, two relocations are
11// generally required: one for the high part and one for the low part. Only
12// the high part generally explicitly depends on r2 (the TOC pointer). And, so,
13// we might produce code like this:
14//
15// .Ltmp526:
16// addis 3, 2, .LC12@toc@ha
17// .Ltmp1628:
18// std 2, 40(1)
19// ld 5, 0(27)
20// ld 2, 8(27)
21// ld 11, 16(27)
22// ld 3, .LC12@toc@l(3)
23// rldicl 4, 4, 0, 32
24// mtctr 5
25// bctrl
26// ld 2, 40(1)
27//
28// And there is nothing wrong with this code, as such, but there is a linker bug
29// in binutils (https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18414) that will
30// misoptimize this code sequence to this:
31// nop
32// std r2,40(r1)
33// ld r5,0(r27)
34// ld r2,8(r27)
35// ld r11,16(r27)
36// ld r3,-32472(r2)
37// clrldi r4,r4,32
38// mtctr r5
39// bctrl
40// ld r2,40(r1)
41// because the linker does not know (and does not check) that the value in r2
42// changed in between the instruction using the .LC12@toc@ha (TOC-relative)
43// relocation and the instruction using the .LC12@toc@l(3) relocation.
44// Because it finds these instructions using the relocations (and not by
45// scanning the instructions), it has been asserted that there is no good way
46// to detect the change of r2 in between. As a result, this bug may never be
47// fixed (i.e. it may become part of the definition of the ABI). GCC was
48// updated to add extra dependencies on r2 to instructions using the @toc@l
49// relocations to avoid this problem, and we'll do the same here.
50//
51// This is done as a separate pass because:
52// 1. These extra r2 dependencies are not really properties of the
53// instructions, but rather due to a linker bug, and maybe one day we'll be
54// able to get rid of them when targeting linkers without this bug (and,
55// thus, keeping the logic centralized here will make that
56// straightforward).
57// 2. There are ISel-level peephole optimizations that propagate the @toc@l
58// relocations to some user instructions, and so the exta dependencies do
59// not apply only to a fixed set of instructions (without undesirable
60// definition replication).
61//
62//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
63
64#include "PPCInstrInfo.h"
65#include "MCTargetDesc/PPCPredicates.h"
66#include "PPC.h"
67#include "PPCInstrBuilder.h"
68#include "PPCMachineFunctionInfo.h"
69#include "PPCTargetMachine.h"
70#include "llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h"
71#include "llvm/ADT/Statistic.h"
72#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineFrameInfo.h"
73#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineFunctionPass.h"
74#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineInstr.h"
75#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineRegisterInfo.h"
76#include "llvm/MC/MCAsmInfo.h"
77#include "llvm/Support/CommandLine.h"
78#include "llvm/Support/Debug.h"
79#include "llvm/Support/ErrorHandling.h"
80#include "llvm/Support/TargetRegistry.h"
81#include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h"
82
83using namespace llvm;
84
85#define DEBUG_TYPE "ppc-toc-reg-deps"
86
87namespace llvm {
88 void initializePPCTOCRegDepsPass(PassRegistry&);
89}
90
91namespace {
92 // PPCTOCRegDeps pass - For simple functions without epilogue code, move
93 // returns up, and create conditional returns, to avoid unnecessary
94 // branch-to-blr sequences.
95 struct PPCTOCRegDeps : public MachineFunctionPass {
96 static char ID;
97 PPCTOCRegDeps() : MachineFunctionPass(ID) {
98 initializePPCTOCRegDepsPass(*PassRegistry::getPassRegistry());
99 }
100
101protected:
102 bool hasTOCLoReloc(const MachineInstr &MI) {
103 if (MI.getOpcode() == PPC::LDtocL ||
104 MI.getOpcode() == PPC::ADDItocL)
105 return true;
106
107 for (const MachineOperand &MO : MI.operands()) {
108 if ((MO.getTargetFlags() & PPCII::MO_ACCESS_MASK) == PPCII::MO_TOC_LO)
109 return true;
110 }
111
112 return false;
113 }
114
115 bool processBlock(MachineBasicBlock &MBB) {
116 bool Changed = false;
117
118 for (auto &MI : MBB) {
119 if (!hasTOCLoReloc(MI))
120 continue;
121
122 MI.addOperand(MachineOperand::CreateReg(PPC::X2,
123 false /*IsDef*/,
124 true /*IsImp*/));
125 Changed = true;
126 }
127
128 return Changed;
129 }
130
131public:
132 bool runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &MF) override {
133 bool Changed = false;
134
135 for (MachineFunction::iterator I = MF.begin(); I != MF.end();) {
136 MachineBasicBlock &B = *I++;
137 if (processBlock(B))
138 Changed = true;
139 }
140
141 return Changed;
142 }
143
144 void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const override {
145 MachineFunctionPass::getAnalysisUsage(AU);
146 }
147 };
Alexander Kornienkof00654e2015-06-23 09:49:53 +0000148}
Hal Finkel8340de12015-05-18 06:25:59 +0000149
150INITIALIZE_PASS(PPCTOCRegDeps, DEBUG_TYPE,
151 "PowerPC TOC Register Dependencies", false, false)
152
153char PPCTOCRegDeps::ID = 0;
154FunctionPass*
155llvm::createPPCTOCRegDepsPass() { return new PPCTOCRegDeps(); }
156