blob: f2e0114a2a35ef645bc9830bf661372a87ebbadb [file] [log] [blame]
Andrew Kaylora89baa22015-09-04 23:47:34 +00001; RUN: opt < %s -simplifycfg -S | FileCheck %s
Andrew Kaylor50e4e862015-09-04 23:39:40 +00002
3; ModuleID = 'cppeh-simplify.cpp'
4target datalayout = "e-m:w-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
5target triple = "x86_64-pc-windows-msvc18.0.0"
6
7
8; This case arises when two objects with empty destructors are cleaned up.
9;
10; void f1() {
11; S a;
12; S b;
13; g();
14; }
15;
16; In this case, both cleanup pads can be eliminated and the invoke can be
17; converted to a call.
18;
19; CHECK: define void @f1()
20; CHECK: entry:
21; CHECK: call void @g()
22; CHECK: ret void
23; CHECK-NOT: cleanuppad
24; CHECK: }
25;
26define void @f1() personality i8* bitcast (i32 (...)* @__CxxFrameHandler3 to i8*) {
27entry:
28 invoke void @g() to label %invoke.cont unwind label %ehcleanup
29
30invoke.cont: ; preds = %entry
31 ret void
32
33ehcleanup: ; preds = %entry
David Majnemer8a1c45d2015-12-12 05:38:55 +000034 %0 = cleanuppad within none []
35 cleanupret from %0 unwind label %ehcleanup.1
Andrew Kaylor50e4e862015-09-04 23:39:40 +000036
37ehcleanup.1: ; preds = %ehcleanup
David Majnemer8a1c45d2015-12-12 05:38:55 +000038 %1 = cleanuppad within none []
39 cleanupret from %1 unwind to caller
Andrew Kaylor50e4e862015-09-04 23:39:40 +000040}
41
42
43; This case arises when an object with an empty destructor must be cleaned up
44; outside of a try-block and an object with a non-empty destructor must be
45; cleaned up within the try-block.
46;
47; void f2() {
48; S a;
49; try {
50; S2 b;
51; g();
52; } catch (...) {}
53; }
54;
55; In this case, the outermost cleanup pad can be eliminated and the catch block
56; should unwind to the caller (that is, exception handling continues with the
57; parent frame of the caller).
58;
59; CHECK: define void @f2()
60; CHECK: entry:
61; CHECK: invoke void @g()
62; CHECK: ehcleanup:
David Majnemer8a1c45d2015-12-12 05:38:55 +000063; CHECK: cleanuppad within none
Andrew Kaylor50e4e862015-09-04 23:39:40 +000064; CHECK: call void @"\01??1S2@@QEAA@XZ"(%struct.S2* %b)
David Majnemer8a1c45d2015-12-12 05:38:55 +000065; CHECK: cleanupret from %0 unwind label %catch.dispatch
Andrew Kaylor50e4e862015-09-04 23:39:40 +000066; CHECK: catch.dispatch:
David Majnemer8a1c45d2015-12-12 05:38:55 +000067; CHECK: catchswitch within none [label %catch] unwind to caller
Andrew Kaylor50e4e862015-09-04 23:39:40 +000068; CHECK: catch:
David Majnemer8a1c45d2015-12-12 05:38:55 +000069; CHECK: catchpad
Andrew Kaylor50e4e862015-09-04 23:39:40 +000070; CHECK: catchret
Andrew Kaylor50e4e862015-09-04 23:39:40 +000071; CHECK-NOT: cleanuppad
72; CHECK: }
73;
74define void @f2() personality i8* bitcast (i32 (...)* @__CxxFrameHandler3 to i8*) {
75entry:
76 %b = alloca %struct.S2, align 1
77 invoke void @g() to label %invoke.cont unwind label %ehcleanup
78
79invoke.cont: ; preds = %entry
80 br label %try.cont
81
82ehcleanup: ; preds = %entry
David Majnemer8a1c45d2015-12-12 05:38:55 +000083 %0 = cleanuppad within none []
Andrew Kaylor50e4e862015-09-04 23:39:40 +000084 call void @"\01??1S2@@QEAA@XZ"(%struct.S2* %b)
David Majnemer8a1c45d2015-12-12 05:38:55 +000085 cleanupret from %0 unwind label %catch.dispatch
Andrew Kaylor50e4e862015-09-04 23:39:40 +000086
87catch.dispatch: ; preds = %ehcleanup
David Majnemer8a1c45d2015-12-12 05:38:55 +000088 %cs1 = catchswitch within none [label %catch] unwind label %ehcleanup.1
Andrew Kaylor50e4e862015-09-04 23:39:40 +000089
90catch: ; preds = %catch.dispatch
David Majnemer8a1c45d2015-12-12 05:38:55 +000091 %1 = catchpad within %cs1 [i8* null, i32 u0x40, i8* null]
92 catchret from %1 to label %catchret.dest
Andrew Kaylor50e4e862015-09-04 23:39:40 +000093
94catchret.dest: ; preds = %catch
95 br label %try.cont
96
97try.cont: ; preds = %catchret.dest, %invoke.cont
98 ret void
99
David Majnemer8a1c45d2015-12-12 05:38:55 +0000100ehcleanup.1:
101 %2 = cleanuppad within none []
102 cleanupret from %2 unwind to caller
Andrew Kaylor50e4e862015-09-04 23:39:40 +0000103}
104
105
106; This case arises when an object with a non-empty destructor must be cleaned up
107; outside of a try-block and an object with an empty destructor must be cleaned
108; within the try-block.
109;
110; void f3() {
111; S2 a;
112; try {
113; S b;
114; g();
115; } catch (...) {}
116; }
117;
118; In this case the inner cleanup pad should be eliminated and the invoke of g()
119; should unwind directly to the catchpad.
120;
David Majnemer8a1c45d2015-12-12 05:38:55 +0000121; CHECK-LABEL: define void @f3()
Andrew Kaylor50e4e862015-09-04 23:39:40 +0000122; CHECK: entry:
123; CHECK: invoke void @g()
124; CHECK: to label %try.cont unwind label %catch.dispatch
125; CHECK: catch.dispatch:
David Majnemer8a1c45d2015-12-12 05:38:55 +0000126; CHECK-NEXT: catchswitch within none [label %catch] unwind label %ehcleanup.1
Andrew Kaylor50e4e862015-09-04 23:39:40 +0000127; CHECK: catch:
David Majnemer8a1c45d2015-12-12 05:38:55 +0000128; CHECK: catchpad within %cs1 [i8* null, i32 64, i8* null]
Andrew Kaylor50e4e862015-09-04 23:39:40 +0000129; CHECK: catchret
Andrew Kaylor50e4e862015-09-04 23:39:40 +0000130; CHECK: ehcleanup.1:
131; CHECK: cleanuppad
132; CHECK: call void @"\01??1S2@@QEAA@XZ"(%struct.S2* %a)
David Majnemer8a1c45d2015-12-12 05:38:55 +0000133; CHECK: cleanupret from %cp3 unwind to caller
Andrew Kaylor50e4e862015-09-04 23:39:40 +0000134; CHECK: }
135;
136define void @f3() personality i8* bitcast (i32 (...)* @__CxxFrameHandler3 to i8*) {
137entry:
138 %a = alloca %struct.S2, align 1
139 invoke void @g() to label %invoke.cont unwind label %ehcleanup
140
141invoke.cont: ; preds = %entry
142 br label %try.cont
143
144ehcleanup: ; preds = %entry
David Majnemer8a1c45d2015-12-12 05:38:55 +0000145 %0 = cleanuppad within none []
146 cleanupret from %0 unwind label %catch.dispatch
Andrew Kaylor50e4e862015-09-04 23:39:40 +0000147
148catch.dispatch: ; preds = %ehcleanup
David Majnemer8a1c45d2015-12-12 05:38:55 +0000149 %cs1 = catchswitch within none [label %catch] unwind label %ehcleanup.1
Andrew Kaylor50e4e862015-09-04 23:39:40 +0000150
151catch: ; preds = %catch.dispatch
David Majnemer8a1c45d2015-12-12 05:38:55 +0000152 %cp2 = catchpad within %cs1 [i8* null, i32 u0x40, i8* null]
153 catchret from %cp2 to label %catchret.dest
Andrew Kaylor50e4e862015-09-04 23:39:40 +0000154
155catchret.dest: ; preds = %catch
156 br label %try.cont
157
158try.cont: ; preds = %catchret.dest, %invoke.cont
159 ret void
160
David Majnemer8a1c45d2015-12-12 05:38:55 +0000161ehcleanup.1:
162 %cp3 = cleanuppad within none []
Andrew Kaylor50e4e862015-09-04 23:39:40 +0000163 call void @"\01??1S2@@QEAA@XZ"(%struct.S2* %a)
David Majnemer8a1c45d2015-12-12 05:38:55 +0000164 cleanupret from %cp3 unwind to caller
Andrew Kaylor50e4e862015-09-04 23:39:40 +0000165}
166
167
168; This case arises when an object with an empty destructor may require cleanup
169; from either inside or outside of a try-block.
170;
171; void f4() {
172; S a;
173; g();
174; try {
175; g();
176; } catch (...) {}
177; }
178;
179; In this case, the cleanuppad should be eliminated, the invoke outside of the
David Majnemer8a1c45d2015-12-12 05:38:55 +0000180; catch block should be converted to a call (that is, that is, exception
181; handling continues with the parent frame of the caller).)
Andrew Kaylor50e4e862015-09-04 23:39:40 +0000182;
David Majnemer8a1c45d2015-12-12 05:38:55 +0000183; CHECK-LABEL: define void @f4()
Andrew Kaylor50e4e862015-09-04 23:39:40 +0000184; CHECK: entry:
185; CHECK: call void @g
186; Note: The cleanuppad simplification will insert an unconditional branch here
187; but it will be eliminated, placing the following invoke in the entry BB.
188; CHECK: invoke void @g()
189; CHECK: to label %try.cont unwind label %catch.dispatch
190; CHECK: catch.dispatch:
David Majnemer8a1c45d2015-12-12 05:38:55 +0000191; CHECK: catchswitch within none [label %catch] unwind to caller
Andrew Kaylor50e4e862015-09-04 23:39:40 +0000192; CHECK: catch:
David Majnemer8a1c45d2015-12-12 05:38:55 +0000193; CHECK: catchpad
Andrew Kaylor50e4e862015-09-04 23:39:40 +0000194; CHECK: catchret
Andrew Kaylor50e4e862015-09-04 23:39:40 +0000195; CHECK-NOT: cleanuppad
196; CHECK: }
197;
198define void @f4() personality i8* bitcast (i32 (...)* @__CxxFrameHandler3 to i8*) {
199entry:
200 invoke void @g()
201 to label %invoke.cont unwind label %ehcleanup
202
203invoke.cont: ; preds = %entry
204 invoke void @g()
205 to label %try.cont unwind label %catch.dispatch
206
207catch.dispatch: ; preds = %invoke.cont
David Majnemer8a1c45d2015-12-12 05:38:55 +0000208 %cs1 = catchswitch within none [label %catch] unwind label %ehcleanup
Andrew Kaylor50e4e862015-09-04 23:39:40 +0000209
210catch: ; preds = %catch.dispatch
David Majnemer8a1c45d2015-12-12 05:38:55 +0000211 %0 = catchpad within %cs1 [i8* null, i32 u0x40, i8* null]
212 catchret from %0 to label %try.cont
Andrew Kaylor50e4e862015-09-04 23:39:40 +0000213
214try.cont: ; preds = %catch, %invoke.cont
215 ret void
216
David Majnemer8a1c45d2015-12-12 05:38:55 +0000217ehcleanup:
218 %cp2 = cleanuppad within none []
219 cleanupret from %cp2 unwind to caller
Andrew Kaylor50e4e862015-09-04 23:39:40 +0000220}
221
Andrew Kaylor50e4e862015-09-04 23:39:40 +0000222; This case tests simplification of an otherwise empty cleanup pad that contains
223; a PHI node.
224;
225; int f6() {
226; int state = 1;
227; try {
228; S a;
229; g();
230; state = 2;
231; g();
232; } catch (...) {
233; return state;
234; }
235; return 0;
236; }
237;
238; In this case, the cleanup pad should be eliminated and the PHI node in the
239; cleanup pad should be sunk into the catch dispatch block.
240;
David Majnemer8a1c45d2015-12-12 05:38:55 +0000241; CHECK-LABEL: define i32 @f6()
Andrew Kaylor50e4e862015-09-04 23:39:40 +0000242; CHECK: entry:
243; CHECK: invoke void @g()
244; CHECK: invoke.cont:
245; CHECK: invoke void @g()
246; CHECK-NOT: ehcleanup:
247; CHECK-NOT: cleanuppad
248; CHECK: catch.dispatch:
249; CHECK: %state.0 = phi i32 [ 2, %invoke.cont ], [ 1, %entry ]
250; CHECK: }
251define i32 @f6() personality i8* bitcast (i32 (...)* @__CxxFrameHandler3 to i8*) {
252entry:
253 invoke void @g()
254 to label %invoke.cont unwind label %ehcleanup
255
256invoke.cont: ; preds = %entry
257 invoke void @g()
258 to label %return unwind label %ehcleanup
259
260ehcleanup: ; preds = %invoke.cont, %entry
261 %state.0 = phi i32 [ 2, %invoke.cont ], [ 1, %entry ]
David Majnemer8a1c45d2015-12-12 05:38:55 +0000262 %0 = cleanuppad within none []
263 cleanupret from %0 unwind label %catch.dispatch
Andrew Kaylor50e4e862015-09-04 23:39:40 +0000264
265catch.dispatch: ; preds = %ehcleanup
David Majnemer8a1c45d2015-12-12 05:38:55 +0000266 %cs1 = catchswitch within none [label %catch] unwind to caller
Andrew Kaylor50e4e862015-09-04 23:39:40 +0000267
268catch: ; preds = %catch.dispatch
David Majnemer8a1c45d2015-12-12 05:38:55 +0000269 %1 = catchpad within %cs1 [i8* null, i32 u0x40, i8* null]
270 catchret from %1 to label %return
Andrew Kaylor50e4e862015-09-04 23:39:40 +0000271
272return: ; preds = %invoke.cont, %catch
273 %retval.0 = phi i32 [ %state.0, %catch ], [ 0, %invoke.cont ]
274 ret i32 %retval.0
275}
276
277; This case tests another variation of simplification of an otherwise empty
278; cleanup pad that contains a PHI node.
279;
280; int f7() {
281; int state = 1;
282; try {
283; g();
284; state = 2;
285; S a;
286; g();
287; state = 3;
288; g();
289; } catch (...) {
290; return state;
291; }
292; return 0;
293; }
294;
295; In this case, the cleanup pad should be eliminated and the PHI node in the
296; cleanup pad should be merged with the PHI node in the catch dispatch block.
297;
David Majnemer8a1c45d2015-12-12 05:38:55 +0000298; CHECK-LABEL: define i32 @f7()
Andrew Kaylor50e4e862015-09-04 23:39:40 +0000299; CHECK: entry:
300; CHECK: invoke void @g()
301; CHECK: invoke.cont:
302; CHECK: invoke void @g()
303; CHECK: invoke.cont.1:
304; CHECK: invoke void @g()
305; CHECK-NOT: ehcleanup:
306; CHECK-NOT: cleanuppad
307; CHECK: catch.dispatch:
308; CHECK: %state.1 = phi i32 [ 1, %entry ], [ 3, %invoke.cont.1 ], [ 2, %invoke.cont ]
309; CHECK: }
310define i32 @f7() personality i8* bitcast (i32 (...)* @__CxxFrameHandler3 to i8*) {
311entry:
312 invoke void @g()
313 to label %invoke.cont unwind label %catch.dispatch
314
315invoke.cont: ; preds = %entry
316 invoke void @g()
317 to label %invoke.cont.1 unwind label %ehcleanup
318
319invoke.cont.1: ; preds = %invoke.cont
320 invoke void @g()
321 to label %return unwind label %ehcleanup
322
323ehcleanup: ; preds = %invoke.cont.1, %invoke.cont
324 %state.0 = phi i32 [ 3, %invoke.cont.1 ], [ 2, %invoke.cont ]
David Majnemer8a1c45d2015-12-12 05:38:55 +0000325 %0 = cleanuppad within none []
326 cleanupret from %0 unwind label %catch.dispatch
Andrew Kaylor50e4e862015-09-04 23:39:40 +0000327
328catch.dispatch: ; preds = %ehcleanup, %entry
329 %state.1 = phi i32 [ %state.0, %ehcleanup ], [ 1, %entry ]
David Majnemer8a1c45d2015-12-12 05:38:55 +0000330 %cs1 = catchswitch within none [label %catch] unwind to caller
Andrew Kaylor50e4e862015-09-04 23:39:40 +0000331
332catch: ; preds = %catch.dispatch
David Majnemer8a1c45d2015-12-12 05:38:55 +0000333 %1 = catchpad within %cs1 [i8* null, i32 u0x40, i8* null]
334 catchret from %1 to label %return
Andrew Kaylor50e4e862015-09-04 23:39:40 +0000335
336return: ; preds = %invoke.cont.1, %catch
337 %retval.0 = phi i32 [ %state.1, %catch ], [ 0, %invoke.cont.1 ]
338 ret i32 %retval.0
339}
340
341; This case tests a scenario where an empty cleanup pad is not dominated by all
342; of the predecessors of its successor, but the successor references a PHI node
343; in the empty cleanup pad.
344;
345; Conceptually, the case being modeled is something like this:
346;
347; int f8() {
348; int x = 1;
349; try {
350; S a;
351; g();
352; x = 2;
353; retry:
354; g();
355; return
356; } catch (...) {
357; use_x(x);
358; }
359; goto retry;
360; }
361;
362; While that C++ syntax isn't legal, the IR below is.
363;
364; In this case, the PHI node that is sunk from ehcleanup to catch.dispatch
365; should have an incoming value entry for path from 'foo' that references the
366; PHI node itself.
367;
David Majnemer8a1c45d2015-12-12 05:38:55 +0000368; CHECK-LABEL: define void @f8()
Andrew Kaylor50e4e862015-09-04 23:39:40 +0000369; CHECK: entry:
370; CHECK: invoke void @g()
371; CHECK: invoke.cont:
372; CHECK: invoke void @g()
373; CHECK-NOT: ehcleanup:
374; CHECK-NOT: cleanuppad
375; CHECK: catch.dispatch:
376; CHECK: %x = phi i32 [ 2, %invoke.cont ], [ 1, %entry ], [ %x, %catch.cont ]
377; CHECK: }
378define void @f8() personality i8* bitcast (i32 (...)* @__CxxFrameHandler3 to i8*) {
379entry:
380 invoke void @g()
381 to label %invoke.cont unwind label %ehcleanup
382
383invoke.cont: ; preds = %entry
384 invoke void @g()
385 to label %return unwind label %ehcleanup
386
387ehcleanup: ; preds = %invoke.cont, %entry
388 %x = phi i32 [ 2, %invoke.cont ], [ 1, %entry ]
David Majnemer8a1c45d2015-12-12 05:38:55 +0000389 %0 = cleanuppad within none []
390 cleanupret from %0 unwind label %catch.dispatch
Andrew Kaylor50e4e862015-09-04 23:39:40 +0000391
392catch.dispatch: ; preds = %ehcleanup, %catch.cont
David Majnemer8a1c45d2015-12-12 05:38:55 +0000393 %cs1 = catchswitch within none [label %catch] unwind to caller
Andrew Kaylor50e4e862015-09-04 23:39:40 +0000394
395catch: ; preds = %catch.dispatch
David Majnemer8a1c45d2015-12-12 05:38:55 +0000396 %1 = catchpad within %cs1 [i8* null, i32 u0x40, i8* null]
Andrew Kaylor50e4e862015-09-04 23:39:40 +0000397 call void @use_x(i32 %x)
David Majnemer8a1c45d2015-12-12 05:38:55 +0000398 catchret from %1 to label %catch.cont
Andrew Kaylor50e4e862015-09-04 23:39:40 +0000399
400catch.cont: ; preds = %catch
401 invoke void @g()
402 to label %return unwind label %catch.dispatch
403
404return: ; preds = %invoke.cont, %catch.cont
405 ret void
406}
David Majnemer9f92f4c2016-05-21 05:12:32 +0000407; CHECK-LABEL: define i32 @f9()
408; CHECK: entry:
409; CHECK: invoke void @"\01??1S2@@QEAA@XZ"(
410; CHECK-NOT: cleanuppad
411; CHECK: catch.dispatch:
412; CHECK: }
413define i32 @f9() personality i32 (...)* @__CxxFrameHandler3 {
414entry:
415 %s = alloca i8, align 1
Matt Arsenaultf10061e2017-04-10 20:18:21 +0000416 call void @llvm.lifetime.start.p0i8(i64 1, i8* nonnull %s)
David Majnemer9f92f4c2016-05-21 05:12:32 +0000417 %bc = bitcast i8* %s to %struct.S2*
418 invoke void @"\01??1S2@@QEAA@XZ"(%struct.S2* %bc)
419 to label %try.cont unwind label %ehcleanup
420
421ehcleanup:
422 %cleanup.pad = cleanuppad within none []
Matt Arsenaultf10061e2017-04-10 20:18:21 +0000423 call void @llvm.lifetime.end.p0i8(i64 1, i8* nonnull %s)
David Majnemer9f92f4c2016-05-21 05:12:32 +0000424 cleanupret from %cleanup.pad unwind label %catch.dispatch
425
426catch.dispatch:
427 %catch.switch = catchswitch within none [label %catch] unwind to caller
428
429catch:
430 %catch.pad = catchpad within %catch.switch [i8* null, i32 0, i8* null]
431 catchret from %catch.pad to label %try.cont
432
433try.cont:
434 ret i32 0
435}
Andrew Kaylor50e4e862015-09-04 23:39:40 +0000436
David Majnemer2482e1c2016-06-04 23:50:03 +0000437; CHECK-LABEL: define void @f10(
438define void @f10(i32 %V) personality i32 (...)* @__CxxFrameHandler3 {
439entry:
440 invoke void @g()
441 to label %unreachable unwind label %cleanup
442; CHECK: call void @g()
443; CHECK-NEXT: unreachable
444
445unreachable:
446 unreachable
447
448cleanup:
449 %cp = cleanuppad within none []
450 switch i32 %V, label %cleanupret1 [
451 i32 0, label %cleanupret2
452 ]
453
454cleanupret1:
455 cleanupret from %cp unwind to caller
456
457cleanupret2:
458 cleanupret from %cp unwind to caller
459}
460
Andrew Kaylor50e4e862015-09-04 23:39:40 +0000461%struct.S = type { i8 }
462%struct.S2 = type { i8 }
463declare void @"\01??1S2@@QEAA@XZ"(%struct.S2*)
464declare void @g()
465declare void @use_x(i32 %x)
466
467declare i32 @__CxxFrameHandler3(...)
468
Matt Arsenaultf10061e2017-04-10 20:18:21 +0000469declare void @llvm.lifetime.start.p0i8(i64, i8* nocapture)
470declare void @llvm.lifetime.end.p0i8(i64, i8* nocapture)