Roman Lebedev | ac4dda8 | 2019-09-21 22:27:18 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | ; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py |
| 2 | ; RUN: opt %s -instsimplify -S | FileCheck %s |
| 3 | |
| 4 | ; Here we add unsigned two values, check that addition did not underflow AND |
| 5 | ; that the result is non-zero. This can be simplified just to a comparison |
| 6 | ; between the base and negated offset. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | ; If we are checking that the result is not null or no underflow happened, |
| 9 | ; it is tautological (always-true). |
| 10 | define i1 @t1(i8 %x, i8 %y) { |
| 11 | ; CHECK-LABEL: @t1( |
| 12 | ; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 true |
| 13 | ; |
| 14 | %not_null = icmp ne i8 %y, 0 |
| 15 | %no_underflow = icmp ule i8 %y, %x |
| 16 | %r = or i1 %not_null, %no_underflow |
| 17 | ret i1 %r |
| 18 | } |
| 19 | define i1 @t2_commutative(i8 %x, i8 %y) { |
| 20 | ; CHECK-LABEL: @t2_commutative( |
| 21 | ; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 true |
| 22 | ; |
| 23 | %not_null = icmp ne i8 %y, 0 |
| 24 | %no_underflow = icmp uge i8 %x, %y ; swapped |
| 25 | %r = or i1 %not_null, %no_underflow |
| 26 | ret i1 %r |
| 27 | } |
| 28 | |
| 29 | define i1 @t3_commutative(i8 %x, i8 %y) { |
| 30 | ; CHECK-LABEL: @t3_commutative( |
| 31 | ; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 true |
| 32 | ; |
| 33 | %not_null = icmp ne i8 %y, 0 |
| 34 | %no_underflow = icmp ule i8 %y, %x |
| 35 | %r = or i1 %no_underflow, %not_null ; swapped |
| 36 | ret i1 %r |
| 37 | } |
| 38 | define i1 @t4_commutative(i8 %x, i8 %y) { |
| 39 | ; CHECK-LABEL: @t4_commutative( |
| 40 | ; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 true |
| 41 | ; |
| 42 | %not_null = icmp ne i8 %y, 0 |
| 43 | %no_underflow = icmp uge i8 %x, %y ; swapped |
| 44 | %r = or i1 %no_underflow, %not_null ; swapped |
| 45 | ret i1 %r |
| 46 | } |
| 47 | |
| 48 | ; If we are checking that the result is null and underflow happened, |
| 49 | ; it is tautological (always-false). |
| 50 | define i1 @t5(i8 %x, i8 %y) { |
| 51 | ; CHECK-LABEL: @t5( |
| 52 | ; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 false |
| 53 | ; |
| 54 | %not_null = icmp eq i8 %y, 0 |
| 55 | %no_underflow = icmp ugt i8 %y, %x |
| 56 | %r = and i1 %not_null, %no_underflow |
| 57 | ret i1 %r |
| 58 | } |
| 59 | define i1 @t6_commutative(i8 %x, i8 %y) { |
| 60 | ; CHECK-LABEL: @t6_commutative( |
| 61 | ; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 false |
| 62 | ; |
| 63 | %not_null = icmp eq i8 %y, 0 |
| 64 | %no_underflow = icmp ult i8 %x, %y ; swapped |
| 65 | %r = and i1 %not_null, %no_underflow |
| 66 | ret i1 %r |
| 67 | } |
| 68 | |
| 69 | ; We only need to know that any of the 'add' operands is non-zero, |
| 70 | ; not necessarily the one used in the comparison. |
| 71 | define i1 @t7(i8 %x, i8 %y) { |
| 72 | ; CHECK-LABEL: @t7( |
| 73 | ; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 true |
| 74 | ; |
| 75 | %cmp = icmp slt i8 %y, 0 |
| 76 | %not_null = icmp ne i8 %y, 0 |
| 77 | %no_underflow = icmp ule i8 %y, %x |
| 78 | %r = or i1 %not_null, %no_underflow |
| 79 | ret i1 %r |
| 80 | } |
| 81 | |
| 82 | ; If we check that no underflow happened and that the result is null, |
| 83 | ; we can just check for null. |
| 84 | define i1 @t8(i8 %x, i8 %y) { |
| 85 | ; CHECK-LABEL: @t8( |
| 86 | ; CHECK-NEXT: [[NOT_NULL:%.*]] = icmp eq i8 [[Y:%.*]], 0 |
Roman Lebedev | baf8098 | 2019-09-21 22:27:39 +0000 | [diff] [blame^] | 87 | ; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[NOT_NULL]] |
Roman Lebedev | ac4dda8 | 2019-09-21 22:27:18 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 88 | ; |
| 89 | %not_null = icmp eq i8 %y, 0 |
| 90 | %no_underflow = icmp ule i8 %y, %x |
| 91 | %r = and i1 %not_null, %no_underflow |
| 92 | ret i1 %r |
| 93 | } |
| 94 | ; Likewise, if we check that result is non-null or underflow happened, |
| 95 | ; we can just check for null. |
| 96 | define i1 @t9(i8 %x, i8 %y) { |
| 97 | ; CHECK-LABEL: @t9( |
| 98 | ; CHECK-NEXT: [[NOT_NULL:%.*]] = icmp ne i8 [[Y:%.*]], 0 |
| 99 | ; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[NOT_NULL]] |
| 100 | ; |
| 101 | %not_null = icmp ne i8 %y, 0 |
| 102 | %no_underflow = icmp ugt i8 %y, %x |
| 103 | %r = or i1 %not_null, %no_underflow |
| 104 | ret i1 %r |
| 105 | } |
| 106 | |
| 107 | ; If we check that no underflow happened or that the result is not null, |
| 108 | ; we can just check for lack of underflow. |
| 109 | define i1 @t10(i8 %x, i8 %y) { |
| 110 | ; CHECK-LABEL: @t10( |
| 111 | ; CHECK-NEXT: [[NO_UNDERFLOW:%.*]] = icmp ule i8 [[Y:%.*]], [[X:%.*]] |
| 112 | ; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[NO_UNDERFLOW]] |
| 113 | ; |
| 114 | %not_null = icmp eq i8 %y, 0 |
| 115 | %no_underflow = icmp ule i8 %y, %x |
| 116 | %r = or i1 %not_null, %no_underflow |
| 117 | ret i1 %r |
| 118 | } |
| 119 | ; Likewise, if we check that underflow happened and that the result is not null, |
| 120 | ; we can just check for lack of underflow. |
| 121 | define i1 @t11(i8 %x, i8 %y) { |
| 122 | ; CHECK-LABEL: @t11( |
| 123 | ; CHECK-NEXT: [[NO_UNDERFLOW:%.*]] = icmp ugt i8 [[Y:%.*]], [[X:%.*]] |
| 124 | ; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[NO_UNDERFLOW]] |
| 125 | ; |
| 126 | %not_null = icmp ne i8 %y, 0 |
| 127 | %no_underflow = icmp ugt i8 %y, %x |
| 128 | %r = and i1 %not_null, %no_underflow |
| 129 | ret i1 %r |
| 130 | } |