blob: 1e46152443e44bef9fe05de9de96427bfcf9aaee [file] [log] [blame]
Philip Reamesf6123222014-12-02 19:37:00 +00001=====================================
2Garbage Collection Safepoints in LLVM
3=====================================
4
5.. contents::
6 :local:
7 :depth: 2
8
9Status
10=======
11
Philip Reamesdfc238b2015-01-02 19:46:49 +000012This document describes a set of experimental extensions to LLVM. Use
13with caution. Because the intrinsics have experimental status,
14compatibility across LLVM releases is not guaranteed.
Philip Reamesf6123222014-12-02 19:37:00 +000015
Philip Reamesdfc238b2015-01-02 19:46:49 +000016LLVM currently supports an alternate mechanism for conservative
Philip Reamese0dd0f22015-02-25 00:18:04 +000017garbage collection support using the ``gcroot`` intrinsic. The mechanism
18described here shares little in common with the alternate ``gcroot``
Philip Reamesdfc238b2015-01-02 19:46:49 +000019implementation and it is hoped that this mechanism will eventually
20replace the gc_root mechanism.
Philip Reamesf6123222014-12-02 19:37:00 +000021
22Overview
23========
24
Philip Reamesdfc238b2015-01-02 19:46:49 +000025To collect dead objects, garbage collectors must be able to identify
26any references to objects contained within executing code, and,
27depending on the collector, potentially update them. The collector
28does not need this information at all points in code - that would make
29the problem much harder - but only at well-defined points in the
30execution known as 'safepoints' For most collectors, it is sufficient
31to track at least one copy of each unique pointer value. However, for
32a collector which wishes to relocate objects directly reachable from
33running code, a higher standard is required.
Philip Reamesf6123222014-12-02 19:37:00 +000034
Philip Reamesdfc238b2015-01-02 19:46:49 +000035One additional challenge is that the compiler may compute intermediate
36results ("derived pointers") which point outside of the allocation or
37even into the middle of another allocation. The eventual use of this
38intermediate value must yield an address within the bounds of the
39allocation, but such "exterior derived pointers" may be visible to the
40collector. Given this, a garbage collector can not safely rely on the
41runtime value of an address to indicate the object it is associated
42with. If the garbage collector wishes to move any object, the
43compiler must provide a mapping, for each pointer, to an indication of
44its allocation.
Philip Reamesf6123222014-12-02 19:37:00 +000045
Philip Reamesdfc238b2015-01-02 19:46:49 +000046To simplify the interaction between a collector and the compiled code,
47most garbage collectors are organized in terms of three abstractions:
48load barriers, store barriers, and safepoints.
Philip Reamesf6123222014-12-02 19:37:00 +000049
Philip Reamesdfc238b2015-01-02 19:46:49 +000050#. A load barrier is a bit of code executed immediately after the
51 machine load instruction, but before any use of the value loaded.
52 Depending on the collector, such a barrier may be needed for all
53 loads, merely loads of a particular type (in the original source
54 language), or none at all.
Philip Reamesf6123222014-12-02 19:37:00 +000055
Bruce Mitchenere9ffb452015-09-12 01:17:08 +000056#. Analogously, a store barrier is a code fragment that runs
Philip Reamesdfc238b2015-01-02 19:46:49 +000057 immediately before the machine store instruction, but after the
58 computation of the value stored. The most common use of a store
59 barrier is to update a 'card table' in a generational garbage
60 collector.
Philip Reamesf6123222014-12-02 19:37:00 +000061
Philip Reamesdfc238b2015-01-02 19:46:49 +000062#. A safepoint is a location at which pointers visible to the compiled
63 code (i.e. currently in registers or on the stack) are allowed to
64 change. After the safepoint completes, the actual pointer value
65 may differ, but the 'object' (as seen by the source language)
66 pointed to will not.
Philip Reamesf6123222014-12-02 19:37:00 +000067
Philip Reamesdfc238b2015-01-02 19:46:49 +000068 Note that the term 'safepoint' is somewhat overloaded. It refers to
69 both the location at which the machine state is parsable and the
70 coordination protocol involved in bring application threads to a
71 point at which the collector can safely use that information. The
72 term "statepoint" as used in this document refers exclusively to the
73 former.
Philip Reamesf6123222014-12-02 19:37:00 +000074
Philip Reamesdfc238b2015-01-02 19:46:49 +000075This document focuses on the last item - compiler support for
76safepoints in generated code. We will assume that an outside
77mechanism has decided where to place safepoints. From our
78perspective, all safepoints will be function calls. To support
79relocation of objects directly reachable from values in compiled code,
80the collector must be able to:
81
82#. identify every copy of a pointer (including copies introduced by
83 the compiler itself) at the safepoint,
Philip Reamesf6123222014-12-02 19:37:00 +000084#. identify which object each pointer relates to, and
85#. potentially update each of those copies.
86
Philip Reamesdfc238b2015-01-02 19:46:49 +000087This document describes the mechanism by which an LLVM based compiler
88can provide this information to a language runtime/collector, and
89ensure that all pointers can be read and updated if desired. The
90heart of the approach is to construct (or rewrite) the IR in a manner
91where the possible updates performed by the garbage collector are
92explicitly visible in the IR. Doing so requires that we:
Philip Reamesf6123222014-12-02 19:37:00 +000093
Philip Reamesdfc238b2015-01-02 19:46:49 +000094#. create a new SSA value for each potentially relocated pointer, and
95 ensure that no uses of the original (non relocated) value is
96 reachable after the safepoint,
97#. specify the relocation in a way which is opaque to the compiler to
98 ensure that the optimizer can not introduce new uses of an
99 unrelocated value after a statepoint. This prevents the optimizer
100 from performing unsound optimizations.
101#. recording a mapping of live pointers (and the allocation they're
102 associated with) for each statepoint.
Philip Reamesf6123222014-12-02 19:37:00 +0000103
Philip Reamesdfc238b2015-01-02 19:46:49 +0000104At the most abstract level, inserting a safepoint can be thought of as
105replacing a call instruction with a call to a multiple return value
106function which both calls the original target of the call, returns
107it's result, and returns updated values for any live pointers to
108garbage collected objects.
Philip Reamesf6123222014-12-02 19:37:00 +0000109
Philip Reamesdfc238b2015-01-02 19:46:49 +0000110 Note that the task of identifying all live pointers to garbage
111 collected values, transforming the IR to expose a pointer giving the
112 base object for every such live pointer, and inserting all the
113 intrinsics correctly is explicitly out of scope for this document.
Philip Reamesc88d7322015-02-25 01:23:59 +0000114 The recommended approach is to use the :ref:`utility passes
115 <statepoint-utilities>` described below.
Philip Reamesf6123222014-12-02 19:37:00 +0000116
Philip Reamesdfc238b2015-01-02 19:46:49 +0000117This abstract function call is concretely represented by a sequence of
Philip Reames5017ab52015-02-26 01:18:21 +0000118intrinsic calls known collectively as a "statepoint relocation sequence".
Philip Reamesf6123222014-12-02 19:37:00 +0000119
120Let's consider a simple call in LLVM IR:
Philip Reamesf6123222014-12-02 19:37:00 +0000121
Philip Reames5017ab52015-02-26 01:18:21 +0000122.. code-block:: llvm
Philip Reamesf6123222014-12-02 19:37:00 +0000123
Philip Reames5017ab52015-02-26 01:18:21 +0000124 define i8 addrspace(1)* @test1(i8 addrspace(1)* %obj)
125 gc "statepoint-example" {
126 call void ()* @foo()
127 ret i8 addrspace(1)* %obj
128 }
Philip Reamesf6123222014-12-02 19:37:00 +0000129
Philip Reames5017ab52015-02-26 01:18:21 +0000130Depending on our language we may need to allow a safepoint during the execution
131of ``foo``. If so, we need to let the collector update local values in the
132current frame. If we don't, we'll be accessing a potential invalid reference
133once we eventually return from the call.
134
135In this example, we need to relocate the SSA value ``%obj``. Since we can't
136actually change the value in the SSA value ``%obj``, we need to introduce a new
137SSA value ``%obj.relocated`` which represents the potentially changed value of
138``%obj`` after the safepoint and update any following uses appropriately. The
139resulting relocation sequence is:
140
141.. code-block:: llvm
142
143 define i8 addrspace(1)* @test1(i8 addrspace(1)* %obj)
144 gc "statepoint-example" {
Chen Lid71999e2015-12-26 07:54:32 +0000145 %0 = call token (i64, i32, void ()*, i32, i32, ...)* @llvm.experimental.gc.statepoint.p0f_isVoidf(i64 0, i32 0, void ()* @foo, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, i8 addrspace(1)* %obj)
146 %obj.relocated = call coldcc i8 addrspace(1)* @llvm.experimental.gc.relocate.p1i8(token %0, i32 7, i32 7)
Philip Reames5017ab52015-02-26 01:18:21 +0000147 ret i8 addrspace(1)* %obj.relocated
148 }
Philip Reamesf6123222014-12-02 19:37:00 +0000149
Philip Reamesdfc238b2015-01-02 19:46:49 +0000150Ideally, this sequence would have been represented as a M argument, N
151return value function (where M is the number of values being
152relocated + the original call arguments and N is the original return
153value + each relocated value), but LLVM does not easily support such a
154representation.
155
156Instead, the statepoint intrinsic marks the actual site of the
157safepoint or statepoint. The statepoint returns a token value (which
158exists only at compile time). To get back the original return value
Philip Reames5017ab52015-02-26 01:18:21 +0000159of the call, we use the ``gc.result`` intrinsic. To get the relocation
160of each pointer in turn, we use the ``gc.relocate`` intrinsic with the
161appropriate index. Note that both the ``gc.relocate`` and ``gc.result`` are
162tied to the statepoint. The combination forms a "statepoint relocation
Bruce Mitchenere9ffb452015-09-12 01:17:08 +0000163sequence" and represents the entirety of a parseable call or 'statepoint'.
Philip Reamesf6123222014-12-02 19:37:00 +0000164
Philip Reames5017ab52015-02-26 01:18:21 +0000165When lowered, this example would generate the following x86 assembly:
166
167.. code-block:: gas
168
169 .globl test1
170 .align 16, 0x90
171 pushq %rax
172 callq foo
173 .Ltmp1:
174 movq (%rsp), %rax # This load is redundant (oops!)
175 popq %rdx
176 retq
Philip Reamesf6123222014-12-02 19:37:00 +0000177
Philip Reamesdfc238b2015-01-02 19:46:49 +0000178Each of the potentially relocated values has been spilled to the
179stack, and a record of that location has been recorded to the
Philip Reames5017ab52015-02-26 01:18:21 +0000180:ref:`Stack Map section <stackmap-section>`. If the garbage collector
Philip Reamesdfc238b2015-01-02 19:46:49 +0000181needs to update any of these pointers during the call, it knows
182exactly what to change.
Philip Reamesf6123222014-12-02 19:37:00 +0000183
Philip Reames5017ab52015-02-26 01:18:21 +0000184The relevant parts of the StackMap section for our example are:
185
186.. code-block:: gas
187
188 # This describes the call site
189 # Stack Maps: callsite 2882400000
190 .quad 2882400000
191 .long .Ltmp1-test1
192 .short 0
193 # .. 8 entries skipped ..
194 # This entry describes the spill slot which is directly addressable
195 # off RSP with offset 0. Given the value was spilled with a pushq,
196 # that makes sense.
197 # Stack Maps: Loc 8: Direct RSP [encoding: .byte 2, .byte 8, .short 7, .int 0]
198 .byte 2
199 .byte 8
200 .short 7
201 .long 0
202
203This example was taken from the tests for the :ref:`RewriteStatepointsForGC` utility pass. As such, it's full StackMap can be easily examined with the following command.
204
205.. code-block:: bash
206
207 opt -rewrite-statepoints-for-gc test/Transforms/RewriteStatepointsForGC/basics.ll -S | llc -debug-only=stackmaps
208
Philip Reamesc9e54442015-08-26 17:25:36 +0000209Base & Derived Pointers
210^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
211
Philip Reamesca22b862015-08-26 23:13:35 +0000212A "base pointer" is one which points to the starting address of an allocation
213(object). A "derived pointer" is one which is offset from a base pointer by
214some amount. When relocating objects, a garbage collector needs to be able
215to relocate each derived pointer associated with an allocation to the same
216offset from the new address.
Philip Reamesc9e54442015-08-26 17:25:36 +0000217
Philip Reamesca22b862015-08-26 23:13:35 +0000218"Interior derived pointers" remain within the bounds of the allocation
219they're associated with. As a result, the base object can be found at
220runtime provided the bounds of allocations are known to the runtime system.
221
222"Exterior derived pointers" are outside the bounds of the associated object;
223they may even fall within *another* allocations address range. As a result,
224there is no way for a garbage collector to determine which allocation they
225are associated with at runtime and compiler support is needed.
226
227The ``gc.relocate`` intrinsic supports an explicit operand for describing the
228allocation associated with a derived pointer. This operand is frequently
229referred to as the base operand, but does not strictly speaking have to be
230a base pointer, but it does need to lie within the bounds of the associated
231allocation. Some collectors may require that the operand be an actual base
232pointer rather than merely an internal derived pointer. Note that during
233lowering both the base and derived pointer operands are required to be live
234over the associated call safepoint even if the base is otherwise unused
235afterwards.
236
237If we extend our previous example to include a pointless derived pointer,
238we get:
239
240.. code-block:: llvm
241
242 define i8 addrspace(1)* @test1(i8 addrspace(1)* %obj)
243 gc "statepoint-example" {
244 %gep = getelementptr i8, i8 addrspace(1)* %obj, i64 20000
Chen Lid71999e2015-12-26 07:54:32 +0000245 %token = call token (i64, i32, void ()*, i32, i32, ...)* @llvm.experimental.gc.statepoint.p0f_isVoidf(i64 0, i32 0, void ()* @foo, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, i8 addrspace(1)* %obj, i8 addrspace(1)* %gep)
246 %obj.relocated = call i8 addrspace(1)* @llvm.experimental.gc.relocate.p1i8(token %token, i32 7, i32 7)
247 %gep.relocated = call i8 addrspace(1)* @llvm.experimental.gc.relocate.p1i8(token %token, i32 7, i32 8)
Philip Reamesca22b862015-08-26 23:13:35 +0000248 %p = getelementptr i8, i8 addrspace(1)* %gep, i64 -20000
249 ret i8 addrspace(1)* %p
250 }
251
252Note that in this example %p and %obj.relocate are the same address and we
253could replace one with the other, potentially removing the derived pointer
Sanjoy Dasa34ce952016-01-20 19:50:25 +0000254from the live set at the safepoint entirely.
255
256.. _gc_transition_args:
Philip Reames5017ab52015-02-26 01:18:21 +0000257
Pat Gavlincc0431d2015-05-08 18:07:42 +0000258GC Transitions
259^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Philip Reames5017ab52015-02-26 01:18:21 +0000260
Pat Gavlincc0431d2015-05-08 18:07:42 +0000261As a practical consideration, many garbage-collected systems allow code that is
262collector-aware ("managed code") to call code that is not collector-aware
263("unmanaged code"). It is common that such calls must also be safepoints, since
264it is desirable to allow the collector to run during the execution of
Sylvestre Ledru84666a12016-02-14 20:16:22 +0000265unmanaged code. Furthermore, it is common that coordinating the transition from
Pat Gavlincc0431d2015-05-08 18:07:42 +0000266managed to unmanaged code requires extra code generation at the call site to
267inform the collector of the transition. In order to support these needs, a
268statepoint may be marked as a GC transition, and data that is necessary to
269perform the transition (if any) may be provided as additional arguments to the
270statepoint.
271
272 Note that although in many cases statepoints may be inferred to be GC
273 transitions based on the function symbols involved (e.g. a call from a
274 function with GC strategy "foo" to a function with GC strategy "bar"),
275 indirect calls that are also GC transitions must also be supported. This
Bruce Mitchenere9ffb452015-09-12 01:17:08 +0000276 requirement is the driving force behind the decision to require that GC
Pat Gavlincc0431d2015-05-08 18:07:42 +0000277 transitions are explicitly marked.
278
279Let's revisit the sample given above, this time treating the call to ``@foo``
280as a GC transition. Depending on our target, the transition code may need to
281access some extra state in order to inform the collector of the transition.
282Let's assume a hypothetical GC--somewhat unimaginatively named "hypothetical-gc"
283--that requires that a TLS variable must be written to before and after a call
284to unmanaged code. The resulting relocation sequence is:
285
286.. code-block:: llvm
287
288 @flag = thread_local global i32 0, align 4
289
290 define i8 addrspace(1)* @test1(i8 addrspace(1) *%obj)
291 gc "hypothetical-gc" {
292
Chen Lid71999e2015-12-26 07:54:32 +0000293 %0 = call token (i64, i32, void ()*, i32, i32, ...)* @llvm.experimental.gc.statepoint.p0f_isVoidf(i64 0, i32 0, void ()* @foo, i32 0, i32 1, i32* @Flag, i32 0, i8 addrspace(1)* %obj)
294 %obj.relocated = call coldcc i8 addrspace(1)* @llvm.experimental.gc.relocate.p1i8(token %0, i32 7, i32 7)
Pat Gavlincc0431d2015-05-08 18:07:42 +0000295 ret i8 addrspace(1)* %obj.relocated
296 }
297
298During lowering, this will result in a instruction selection DAG that looks
299something like:
300
Pat Gavlin7afaed22015-05-08 18:37:49 +0000301::
Pat Gavlincc0431d2015-05-08 18:07:42 +0000302
303 CALLSEQ_START
304 ...
305 GC_TRANSITION_START (lowered i32 *@Flag), SRCVALUE i32* Flag
306 STATEPOINT
307 GC_TRANSITION_END (lowered i32 *@Flag), SRCVALUE i32 *Flag
308 ...
309 CALLSEQ_END
310
311In order to generate the necessary transition code, the backend for each target
312supported by "hypothetical-gc" must be modified to lower ``GC_TRANSITION_START``
313and ``GC_TRANSITION_END`` nodes appropriately when the "hypothetical-gc"
314strategy is in use for a particular function. Assuming that such lowering has
315been added for X86, the generated assembly would be:
316
317.. code-block:: gas
318
319 .globl test1
320 .align 16, 0x90
321 pushq %rax
322 movl $1, %fs:Flag@TPOFF
323 callq foo
324 movl $0, %fs:Flag@TPOFF
325 .Ltmp1:
326 movq (%rsp), %rax # This load is redundant (oops!)
327 popq %rdx
328 retq
329
330Note that the design as presented above is not fully implemented: in particular,
331strategy-specific lowering is not present, and all GC transitions are emitted as
332as single no-op before and after the call instruction. These no-ops are often
333removed by the backend during dead machine instruction elimination.
Philip Reames5017ab52015-02-26 01:18:21 +0000334
335
Philip Reamesf6123222014-12-02 19:37:00 +0000336Intrinsics
337===========
338
Philip Reamesc0127282015-02-24 23:57:26 +0000339'llvm.experimental.gc.statepoint' Intrinsic
340^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Philip Reamesf6123222014-12-02 19:37:00 +0000341
342Syntax:
343"""""""
344
345::
346
Chen Lid71999e2015-12-26 07:54:32 +0000347 declare token
Sanjoy Dasa1d39ba2015-05-12 23:52:24 +0000348 @llvm.experimental.gc.statepoint(i64 <id>, i32 <num patch bytes>,
349 func_type <target>,
Sanjoy Dasdc4932f2015-05-13 20:19:51 +0000350 i64 <#call args>, i64 <flags>,
Philip Reamesc0127282015-02-24 23:57:26 +0000351 ... (call parameters),
Pat Gavlincc0431d2015-05-08 18:07:42 +0000352 i64 <# transition args>, ... (transition parameters),
Philip Reamesf6123222014-12-02 19:37:00 +0000353 i64 <# deopt args>, ... (deopt parameters),
354 ... (gc parameters))
355
356Overview:
357"""""""""
358
Philip Reamesdfc238b2015-01-02 19:46:49 +0000359The statepoint intrinsic represents a call which is parse-able by the
360runtime.
Philip Reamesf6123222014-12-02 19:37:00 +0000361
362Operands:
363"""""""""
364
Sanjoy Dasa1d39ba2015-05-12 23:52:24 +0000365The 'id' operand is a constant integer that is reported as the ID
366field in the generated stackmap. LLVM does not interpret this
367parameter in any way and its meaning is up to the statepoint user to
368decide. Note that LLVM is free to duplicate code containing
369statepoint calls, and this may transform IR that had a unique 'id' per
370lexical call to statepoint to IR that does not.
371
372If 'num patch bytes' is non-zero then the call instruction
373corresponding to the statepoint is not emitted and LLVM emits 'num
374patch bytes' bytes of nops in its place. LLVM will emit code to
375prepare the function arguments and retrieve the function return value
376in accordance to the calling convention; the former before the nop
377sequence and the latter after the nop sequence. It is expected that
378the user will patch over the 'num patch bytes' bytes of nops with a
379calling sequence specific to their runtime before executing the
380generated machine code. There are no guarantees with respect to the
381alignment of the nop sequence. Unlike :doc:`StackMaps` statepoints do
Sanjoy Dascfe41f02015-07-28 23:50:30 +0000382not have a concept of shadow bytes. Note that semantically the
383statepoint still represents a call or invoke to 'target', and the nop
384sequence after patching is expected to represent an operation
385equivalent to a call or invoke to 'target'.
Sanjoy Dasa1d39ba2015-05-12 23:52:24 +0000386
Philip Reamesdfc238b2015-01-02 19:46:49 +0000387The 'target' operand is the function actually being called. The
388target can be specified as either a symbolic LLVM function, or as an
389arbitrary Value of appropriate function type. Note that the function
390type must match the signature of the callee and the types of the 'call
Sanjoy Dascfe41f02015-07-28 23:50:30 +0000391parameters' arguments.
Philip Reamesf6123222014-12-02 19:37:00 +0000392
Philip Reamesdfc238b2015-01-02 19:46:49 +0000393The '#call args' operand is the number of arguments to the actual
394call. It must exactly match the number of arguments passed in the
395'call parameters' variable length section.
Philip Reamesf6123222014-12-02 19:37:00 +0000396
Pat Gavlincc0431d2015-05-08 18:07:42 +0000397The 'flags' operand is used to specify extra information about the
398statepoint. This is currently only used to mark certain statepoints
399as GC transitions. This operand is a 64-bit integer with the following
400layout, where bit 0 is the least significant bit:
401
402 +-------+---------------------------------------------------+
403 | Bit # | Usage |
404 +=======+===================================================+
405 | 0 | Set if the statepoint is a GC transition, cleared |
406 | | otherwise. |
407 +-------+---------------------------------------------------+
408 | 1-63 | Reserved for future use; must be cleared. |
409 +-------+---------------------------------------------------+
Philip Reamesf6123222014-12-02 19:37:00 +0000410
Philip Reamesdfc238b2015-01-02 19:46:49 +0000411The 'call parameters' arguments are simply the arguments which need to
412be passed to the call target. They will be lowered according to the
413specified calling convention and otherwise handled like a normal call
414instruction. The number of arguments must exactly match what is
415specified in '# call args'. The types must match the signature of
416'target'.
Philip Reamesf6123222014-12-02 19:37:00 +0000417
Pat Gavlincc0431d2015-05-08 18:07:42 +0000418The 'transition parameters' arguments contain an arbitrary list of
419Values which need to be passed to GC transition code. They will be
420lowered and passed as operands to the appropriate GC_TRANSITION nodes
421in the selection DAG. It is assumed that these arguments must be
422available before and after (but not necessarily during) the execution
423of the callee. The '# transition args' field indicates how many operands
424are to be interpreted as 'transition parameters'.
425
Philip Reamesdfc238b2015-01-02 19:46:49 +0000426The 'deopt parameters' arguments contain an arbitrary list of Values
427which is meaningful to the runtime. The runtime may read any of these
428values, but is assumed not to modify them. If the garbage collector
429might need to modify one of these values, it must also be listed in
430the 'gc pointer' argument list. The '# deopt args' field indicates
431how many operands are to be interpreted as 'deopt parameters'.
Philip Reamesf6123222014-12-02 19:37:00 +0000432
Philip Reamesdfc238b2015-01-02 19:46:49 +0000433The 'gc parameters' arguments contain every pointer to a garbage
434collector object which potentially needs to be updated by the garbage
435collector. Note that the argument list must explicitly contain a base
436pointer for every derived pointer listed. The order of arguments is
437unimportant. Unlike the other variable length parameter sets, this
438list is not length prefixed.
Philip Reamesf6123222014-12-02 19:37:00 +0000439
440Semantics:
441""""""""""
442
Philip Reamesdfc238b2015-01-02 19:46:49 +0000443A statepoint is assumed to read and write all memory. As a result,
444memory operations can not be reordered past a statepoint. It is
445illegal to mark a statepoint as being either 'readonly' or 'readnone'.
Philip Reamesf6123222014-12-02 19:37:00 +0000446
Philip Reamesdfc238b2015-01-02 19:46:49 +0000447Note that legal IR can not perform any memory operation on a 'gc
448pointer' argument of the statepoint in a location statically reachable
449from the statepoint. Instead, the explicitly relocated value (from a
Philip Reamesc609a592015-02-25 00:22:07 +0000450``gc.relocate``) must be used.
Philip Reamesf6123222014-12-02 19:37:00 +0000451
Philip Reamesc0127282015-02-24 23:57:26 +0000452'llvm.experimental.gc.result' Intrinsic
453^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Philip Reamesf6123222014-12-02 19:37:00 +0000454
455Syntax:
456"""""""
457
458::
459
460 declare type*
Chen Lid71999e2015-12-26 07:54:32 +0000461 @llvm.experimental.gc.result(token %statepoint_token)
Philip Reamesf6123222014-12-02 19:37:00 +0000462
463Overview:
464"""""""""
465
Philip Reamesc609a592015-02-25 00:22:07 +0000466``gc.result`` extracts the result of the original call instruction
467which was replaced by the ``gc.statepoint``. The ``gc.result``
Philip Reamesdfc238b2015-01-02 19:46:49 +0000468intrinsic is actually a family of three intrinsics due to an
469implementation limitation. Other than the type of the return value,
470the semantics are the same.
Philip Reamesf6123222014-12-02 19:37:00 +0000471
472Operands:
473"""""""""
474
Philip Reamesc609a592015-02-25 00:22:07 +0000475The first and only argument is the ``gc.statepoint`` which starts
476the safepoint sequence of which this ``gc.result`` is a part.
Chen Lid71999e2015-12-26 07:54:32 +0000477Despite the typing of this as a generic token, *only* the value defined
Philip Reamesc609a592015-02-25 00:22:07 +0000478by a ``gc.statepoint`` is legal here.
Philip Reamesf6123222014-12-02 19:37:00 +0000479
480Semantics:
481""""""""""
482
Philip Reamesc609a592015-02-25 00:22:07 +0000483The ``gc.result`` represents the return value of the call target of
484the ``statepoint``. The type of the ``gc.result`` must exactly match
Philip Reamesdfc238b2015-01-02 19:46:49 +0000485the type of the target. If the call target returns void, there will
Philip Reamesc609a592015-02-25 00:22:07 +0000486be no ``gc.result``.
Philip Reamesf6123222014-12-02 19:37:00 +0000487
Philip Reamesc609a592015-02-25 00:22:07 +0000488A ``gc.result`` is modeled as a 'readnone' pure function. It has no
Philip Reamesdfc238b2015-01-02 19:46:49 +0000489side effects since it is just a projection of the return value of the
Philip Reamesc609a592015-02-25 00:22:07 +0000490previous call represented by the ``gc.statepoint``.
Philip Reamesf6123222014-12-02 19:37:00 +0000491
Philip Reamesc0127282015-02-24 23:57:26 +0000492'llvm.experimental.gc.relocate' Intrinsic
493^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Philip Reamesf6123222014-12-02 19:37:00 +0000494
495Syntax:
496"""""""
497
498::
499
Philip Reamesc0127282015-02-24 23:57:26 +0000500 declare <pointer type>
Chen Lid71999e2015-12-26 07:54:32 +0000501 @llvm.experimental.gc.relocate(token %statepoint_token,
Philip Reamesc0127282015-02-24 23:57:26 +0000502 i32 %base_offset,
503 i32 %pointer_offset)
Philip Reamesf6123222014-12-02 19:37:00 +0000504
505Overview:
506"""""""""
507
Philip Reamesc609a592015-02-25 00:22:07 +0000508A ``gc.relocate`` returns the potentially relocated value of a pointer
Philip Reamesdfc238b2015-01-02 19:46:49 +0000509at the safepoint.
Philip Reamesf6123222014-12-02 19:37:00 +0000510
511Operands:
512"""""""""
513
Philip Reamesc609a592015-02-25 00:22:07 +0000514The first argument is the ``gc.statepoint`` which starts the
515safepoint sequence of which this ``gc.relocation`` is a part.
Chen Lid71999e2015-12-26 07:54:32 +0000516Despite the typing of this as a generic token, *only* the value defined
Philip Reamesc609a592015-02-25 00:22:07 +0000517by a ``gc.statepoint`` is legal here.
Philip Reamesf6123222014-12-02 19:37:00 +0000518
Philip Reamesdfc238b2015-01-02 19:46:49 +0000519The second argument is an index into the statepoints list of arguments
Philip Reamesca22b862015-08-26 23:13:35 +0000520which specifies the allocation for the pointer being relocated.
Philip Reamesdfc238b2015-01-02 19:46:49 +0000521This index must land within the 'gc parameter' section of the
Philip Reamesca22b862015-08-26 23:13:35 +0000522statepoint's argument list. The associated value must be within the
523object with which the pointer being relocated is associated. The optimizer
524is free to change *which* interior derived pointer is reported, provided that
525it does not replace an actual base pointer with another interior derived
526pointer. Collectors are allowed to rely on the base pointer operand
527remaining an actual base pointer if so constructed.
Philip Reamesf6123222014-12-02 19:37:00 +0000528
Philip Reamesdfc238b2015-01-02 19:46:49 +0000529The third argument is an index into the statepoint's list of arguments
530which specify the (potentially) derived pointer being relocated. It
531is legal for this index to be the same as the second argument
532if-and-only-if a base pointer is being relocated. This index must land
533within the 'gc parameter' section of the statepoint's argument list.
Philip Reamesf6123222014-12-02 19:37:00 +0000534
535Semantics:
536""""""""""
Philip Reamesf6123222014-12-02 19:37:00 +0000537
Philip Reamesc609a592015-02-25 00:22:07 +0000538The return value of ``gc.relocate`` is the potentially relocated value
Philip Reamesdfc238b2015-01-02 19:46:49 +0000539of the pointer specified by it's arguments. It is unspecified how the
540value of the returned pointer relates to the argument to the
Philip Reamesc609a592015-02-25 00:22:07 +0000541``gc.statepoint`` other than that a) it points to the same source
Philip Reamesdfc238b2015-01-02 19:46:49 +0000542language object with the same offset, and b) the 'based-on'
543relationship of the newly relocated pointers is a projection of the
544unrelocated pointers. In particular, the integer value of the pointer
545returned is unspecified.
546
Philip Reamesc609a592015-02-25 00:22:07 +0000547A ``gc.relocate`` is modeled as a ``readnone`` pure function. It has no
Philip Reamesdfc238b2015-01-02 19:46:49 +0000548side effects since it is just a way to extract information about work
Philip Reamesc609a592015-02-25 00:22:07 +0000549done during the actual call modeled by the ``gc.statepoint``.
Philip Reamesf6123222014-12-02 19:37:00 +0000550
Philip Reamese6625502015-02-25 23:22:43 +0000551.. _statepoint-stackmap-format:
Philip Reamesf6123222014-12-02 19:37:00 +0000552
Philip Reamesce5ff372014-12-04 00:45:23 +0000553Stack Map Format
Philip Reamesf6123222014-12-02 19:37:00 +0000554================
555
Philip Reamesdfc238b2015-01-02 19:46:49 +0000556Locations for each pointer value which may need read and/or updated by
557the runtime or collector are provided via the :ref:`Stack Map format
558<stackmap-format>` specified in the PatchPoint documentation.
Philip Reamesf6123222014-12-02 19:37:00 +0000559
560Each statepoint generates the following Locations:
561
Pat Gavlinc7dc6d6ee2015-05-12 19:50:19 +0000562* Constant which describes the calling convention of the call target. This
563 constant is a valid :ref:`calling convention identifier <callingconv>` for
564 the version of LLVM used to generate the stackmap. No additional compatibility
565 guarantees are made for this constant over what LLVM provides elsewhere w.r.t.
566 these identifiers.
567* Constant which describes the flags passed to the statepoint intrinsic
Philip Reamesdfc238b2015-01-02 19:46:49 +0000568* Constant which describes number of following deopt *Locations* (not
569 operands)
570* Variable number of Locations, one for each deopt parameter listed in
Philip Reames95e363d2016-01-14 23:58:18 +0000571 the IR statepoint (same number as described by previous Constant). At
572 the moment, only deopt parameters with a bitwidth of 64 bits or less
573 are supported. Values of a type larger than 64 bits can be specified
574 and reported only if a) the value is constant at the call site, and b)
575 the constant can be represented with less than 64 bits (assuming zero
576 extension to the original bitwidth).
Philip Reames35bafee2016-01-15 00:13:39 +0000577* Variable number of relocation records, each of which consists of
578 exactly two Locations. Relocation records are described in detail
579 below.
580
581Each relocation record provides sufficient information for a collector to
582relocate one or more derived pointers. Each record consists of a pair of
583Locations. The second element in the record represents the pointer (or
584pointers) which need updated. The first element in the record provides a
585pointer to the base of the object with which the pointer(s) being relocated is
586associated. This information is required for handling generalized derived
587pointers since a pointer may be outside the bounds of the original allocation,
588but still needs to be relocated with the allocation. Additionally:
589
590* It is guaranteed that the base pointer must also appear explicitly as a
591 relocation pair if used after the statepoint.
592* There may be fewer relocation records then gc parameters in the IR
Philip Reamesdfc238b2015-01-02 19:46:49 +0000593 statepoint. Each *unique* pair will occur at least once; duplicates
Philip Reames35bafee2016-01-15 00:13:39 +0000594 are possible.
595* The Locations within each record may either be of pointer size or a
596 multiple of pointer size. In the later case, the record must be
597 interpreted as describing a sequence of pointers and their corresponding
598 base pointers. If the Location is of size N x sizeof(pointer), then
599 there will be N records of one pointer each contained within the Location.
600 Both Locations in a pair can be assumed to be of the same size.
Philip Reamesf6123222014-12-02 19:37:00 +0000601
Philip Reamesdfc238b2015-01-02 19:46:49 +0000602Note that the Locations used in each section may describe the same
603physical location. e.g. A stack slot may appear as a deopt location,
604a gc base pointer, and a gc derived pointer.
Philip Reamesf6123222014-12-02 19:37:00 +0000605
Philip Reamesdfc238b2015-01-02 19:46:49 +0000606The LiveOut section of the StkMapRecord will be empty for a statepoint
607record.
Philip Reamesf6123222014-12-02 19:37:00 +0000608
609Safepoint Semantics & Verification
610==================================
611
Philip Reamesdfc238b2015-01-02 19:46:49 +0000612The fundamental correctness property for the compiled code's
613correctness w.r.t. the garbage collector is a dynamic one. It must be
614the case that there is no dynamic trace such that a operation
615involving a potentially relocated pointer is observably-after a
616safepoint which could relocate it. 'observably-after' is this usage
617means that an outside observer could observe this sequence of events
618in a way which precludes the operation being performed before the
619safepoint.
Philip Reamesf6123222014-12-02 19:37:00 +0000620
Philip Reamesdfc238b2015-01-02 19:46:49 +0000621To understand why this 'observable-after' property is required,
622consider a null comparison performed on the original copy of a
623relocated pointer. Assuming that control flow follows the safepoint,
624there is no way to observe externally whether the null comparison is
625performed before or after the safepoint. (Remember, the original
626Value is unmodified by the safepoint.) The compiler is free to make
627either scheduling choice.
Philip Reamesf6123222014-12-02 19:37:00 +0000628
Philip Reamesdfc238b2015-01-02 19:46:49 +0000629The actual correctness property implemented is slightly stronger than
630this. We require that there be no *static path* on which a
631potentially relocated pointer is 'observably-after' it may have been
632relocated. This is slightly stronger than is strictly necessary (and
633thus may disallow some otherwise valid programs), but greatly
634simplifies reasoning about correctness of the compiled code.
Philip Reamesf6123222014-12-02 19:37:00 +0000635
Philip Reamesdfc238b2015-01-02 19:46:49 +0000636By construction, this property will be upheld by the optimizer if
637correctly established in the source IR. This is a key invariant of
638the design.
Philip Reamesf6123222014-12-02 19:37:00 +0000639
Philip Reamesdfc238b2015-01-02 19:46:49 +0000640The existing IR Verifier pass has been extended to check most of the
641local restrictions on the intrinsics mentioned in their respective
642documentation. The current implementation in LLVM does not check the
643key relocation invariant, but this is ongoing work on developing such
Tanya Lattner0d28f802015-08-05 03:51:17 +0000644a verifier. Please ask on llvm-dev if you're interested in
Philip Reamesdfc238b2015-01-02 19:46:49 +0000645experimenting with the current version.
Philip Reamesf6123222014-12-02 19:37:00 +0000646
Philip Reamesc88d7322015-02-25 01:23:59 +0000647.. _statepoint-utilities:
648
649Utility Passes for Safepoint Insertion
650======================================
651
652.. _RewriteStatepointsForGC:
653
654RewriteStatepointsForGC
655^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
656
657The pass RewriteStatepointsForGC transforms a functions IR by replacing a
658``gc.statepoint`` (with an optional ``gc.result``) with a full relocation
659sequence, including all required ``gc.relocates``. To function, the pass
660requires that the GC strategy specified for the function be able to reliably
661distinguish between GC references and non-GC references in IR it is given.
662
663As an example, given this code:
664
665.. code-block:: llvm
666
667 define i8 addrspace(1)* @test1(i8 addrspace(1)* %obj)
668 gc "statepoint-example" {
Chen Lid71999e2015-12-26 07:54:32 +0000669 call token (i64, i32, void ()*, i32, i32, ...)* @llvm.experimental.gc.statepoint.p0f_isVoidf(i64 2882400000, i32 0, void ()* @foo, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, i32 5, i32 0, i32 -1, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0)
Philip Reamesc88d7322015-02-25 01:23:59 +0000670 ret i8 addrspace(1)* %obj
671 }
672
673The pass would produce this IR:
674
675.. code-block:: llvm
676
677 define i8 addrspace(1)* @test1(i8 addrspace(1)* %obj)
678 gc "statepoint-example" {
Chen Lid71999e2015-12-26 07:54:32 +0000679 %0 = call token (i64, i32, void ()*, i32, i32, ...)* @llvm.experimental.gc.statepoint.p0f_isVoidf(i64 2882400000, i32 0, void ()* @foo, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, i32 5, i32 0, i32 -1, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, i8 addrspace(1)* %obj)
680 %obj.relocated = call coldcc i8 addrspace(1)* @llvm.experimental.gc.relocate.p1i8(token %0, i32 12, i32 12)
Philip Reamesc88d7322015-02-25 01:23:59 +0000681 ret i8 addrspace(1)* %obj.relocated
682 }
683
684In the above examples, the addrspace(1) marker on the pointers is the mechanism
685that the ``statepoint-example`` GC strategy uses to distinguish references from
686non references. Address space 1 is not globally reserved for this purpose.
687
688This pass can be used an utility function by a language frontend that doesn't
689want to manually reason about liveness, base pointers, or relocation when
690constructing IR. As currently implemented, RewriteStatepointsForGC must be
Philip Reamesca22b862015-08-26 23:13:35 +0000691run after SSA construction (i.e. mem2ref).
Philip Reamesc88d7322015-02-25 01:23:59 +0000692
Philip Reamesca22b862015-08-26 23:13:35 +0000693RewriteStatepointsForGC will ensure that appropriate base pointers are listed
694for every relocation created. It will do so by duplicating code as needed to
695propagate the base pointer associated with each pointer being relocated to
696the appropriate safepoints. The implementation assumes that the following
697IR constructs produce base pointers: loads from the heap, addresses of global
698variables, function arguments, function return values. Constant pointers (such
699as null) are also assumed to be base pointers. In practice, this constraint
700can be relaxed to producing interior derived pointers provided the target
701collector can find the associated allocation from an arbitrary interior
702derived pointer.
Philip Reamesc88d7322015-02-25 01:23:59 +0000703
704In practice, RewriteStatepointsForGC can be run much later in the pass
705pipeline, after most optimization is already done. This helps to improve
706the quality of the generated code when compiled with garbage collection support.
707In the long run, this is the intended usage model. At this time, a few details
708have yet to be worked out about the semantic model required to guarantee this
709is always correct. As such, please use with caution and report bugs.
710
711.. _PlaceSafepoints:
712
713PlaceSafepoints
714^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
715
716The pass PlaceSafepoints transforms a function's IR by replacing any call or
717invoke instructions with appropriate ``gc.statepoint`` and ``gc.result`` pairs,
718and inserting safepoint polls sufficient to ensure running code checks for a
719safepoint request on a timely manner. This pass is expected to be run before
720RewriteStatepointsForGC and thus does not produce full relocation sequences.
721
Philip Reames5017ab52015-02-26 01:18:21 +0000722As an example, given input IR of the following:
723
724.. code-block:: llvm
725
726 define void @test() gc "statepoint-example" {
727 call void @foo()
728 ret void
729 }
730
731 declare void @do_safepoint()
732 define void @gc.safepoint_poll() {
733 call void @do_safepoint()
734 ret void
735 }
736
737
738This pass would produce the following IR:
739
740.. code-block:: llvm
741
742 define void @test() gc "statepoint-example" {
Chen Lid71999e2015-12-26 07:54:32 +0000743 %safepoint_token = call token (i64, i32, void ()*, i32, i32, ...)* @llvm.experimental.gc.statepoint.p0f_isVoidf(i64 2882400000, i32 0, void ()* @do_safepoint, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0)
744 %safepoint_token1 = call token (i64, i32, void ()*, i32, i32, ...)* @llvm.experimental.gc.statepoint.p0f_isVoidf(i64 2882400000, i32 0, void ()* @foo, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0)
Philip Reames5017ab52015-02-26 01:18:21 +0000745 ret void
746 }
747
748In this case, we've added an (unconditional) entry safepoint poll and converted the call into a ``gc.statepoint``. Note that despite appearances, the entry poll is not necessarily redundant. We'd have to know that ``foo`` and ``test`` were not mutually recursive for the poll to be redundant. In practice, you'd probably want to your poll definition to contain a conditional branch of some form.
749
750
Philip Reamesc88d7322015-02-25 01:23:59 +0000751At the moment, PlaceSafepoints can insert safepoint polls at method entry and
752loop backedges locations. Extending this to work with return polls would be
753straight forward if desired.
754
755PlaceSafepoints includes a number of optimizations to avoid placing safepoint
756polls at particular sites unless needed to ensure timely execution of a poll
757under normal conditions. PlaceSafepoints does not attempt to ensure timely
758execution of a poll under worst case conditions such as heavy system paging.
759
760The implementation of a safepoint poll action is specified by looking up a
761function of the name ``gc.safepoint_poll`` in the containing Module. The body
762of this function is inserted at each poll site desired. While calls or invokes
763inside this method are transformed to a ``gc.statepoints``, recursive poll
764insertion is not performed.
765
Sanjoy Dasba74e642015-05-13 20:11:31 +0000766By default PlaceSafepoints passes in ``0xABCDEF00`` as the statepoint
767ID and ``0`` as the number of patchable bytes to the newly constructed
768``gc.statepoint``. These values can be configured on a per-callsite
769basis using the attributes ``"statepoint-id"`` and
770``"statepoint-num-patch-bytes"``. If a call site is marked with a
771``"statepoint-id"`` function attribute and its value is a positive
772integer (represented as a string), then that value is used as the ID
773of the newly constructed ``gc.statepoint``. If a call site is marked
774with a ``"statepoint-num-patch-bytes"`` function attribute and its
775value is a positive integer, then that value is used as the 'num patch
776bytes' parameter of the newly constructed ``gc.statepoint``. The
777``"statepoint-id"`` and ``"statepoint-num-patch-bytes"`` attributes
778are not propagated to the ``gc.statepoint`` call or invoke if they
779could be successfully parsed.
780
Philip Reamesc88d7322015-02-25 01:23:59 +0000781If you are scheduling the RewriteStatepointsForGC pass late in the pass order,
782you should probably schedule this pass immediately before it. The exception
783would be if you need to preserve abstract frame information (e.g. for
784deoptimization or introspection) at safepoints. In that case, ask on the
Tanya Lattner0d28f802015-08-05 03:51:17 +0000785llvm-dev mailing list for suggestions.
Philip Reamesc88d7322015-02-25 01:23:59 +0000786
787
Philip Reamesb7736312015-07-16 21:10:46 +0000788Supported Architectures
789=======================
790
791Support for statepoint generation requires some code for each backend.
792Today, only X86_64 is supported.
793
Philip Reames83331522014-12-04 18:33:28 +0000794Bugs and Enhancements
795=====================
Philip Reamesdfc238b2015-01-02 19:46:49 +0000796
797Currently known bugs and enhancements under consideration can be
798tracked by performing a `bugzilla search
799<http://llvm.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamed&namedcmd=Statepoint%20Bugs&list_id=64342>`_
800for [Statepoint] in the summary field. When filing new bugs, please
801use this tag so that interested parties see the newly filed bug. As
Tanya Lattner0d28f802015-08-05 03:51:17 +0000802with most LLVM features, design discussions take place on `llvm-dev
803<http://lists.llvm.org/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev>`_, and patches
Philip Reamesdfc238b2015-01-02 19:46:49 +0000804should be sent to `llvm-commits
Tanya Lattner0d28f802015-08-05 03:51:17 +0000805<http://lists.llvm.org/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits>`_ for review.
Philip Reames83331522014-12-04 18:33:28 +0000806