Richard Smith | 4eb8393 | 2016-04-27 21:57:05 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | // RUN: rm -rf %t |
| 2 | // RUN: %clang_cc1 -fmodules -fmodules-cache-path=%t -fimplicit-module-maps -I%S/Inputs/suggest-include %s -verify |
| 3 | |
| 4 | #include "empty.h" // import the module file |
| 5 | |
| 6 | // expected-note@usetextual1.h:2 {{previous}} |
| 7 | // expected-note@textual2.h:1 {{previous}} |
| 8 | // expected-note@textual3.h:1 {{previous}} |
| 9 | // expected-note@textual4.h:1 {{previous}} |
| 10 | // expected-note@textual5.h:1 {{previous}} |
| 11 | // expected-note@private1.h:1 {{previous}} |
| 12 | // expected-note@private2.h:1 {{previous}} |
| 13 | // expected-note@private3.h:1 {{previous}} |
| 14 | |
| 15 | void f() { |
| 16 | (void)::usetextual1; // expected-error {{missing '#include "usetextual1.h"'}} |
| 17 | (void)::usetextual2; // expected-error {{missing '#include "usetextual2.h"'}} |
| 18 | (void)::textual3; // expected-error-re {{{{^}}missing '#include "usetextual3.h"'}} |
| 19 | // Don't suggest a #include that includes the entity via a path that leaves |
| 20 | // the module. In that case we can't be sure that we've picked the right header. |
| 21 | (void)::textual4; // expected-error-re {{{{^}}declaration of 'textual4'}} |
| 22 | (void)::textual5; // expected-error-re {{{{^}}declaration of 'textual5'}} |
| 23 | |
| 24 | // Don't suggest #including a private header. |
| 25 | // FIXME: We could suggest including "useprivate1.h" here, as it's the only |
| 26 | // public way to get at this declaration. |
| 27 | (void)::private1; // expected-error-re {{{{^}}declaration of 'private1'}} |
| 28 | // FIXME: Should we be suggesting an import at all here? Should declarations |
| 29 | // in private headers be visible when the surrounding module is imported? |
| 30 | (void)::private2; // expected-error-re {{{{^}}declaration of 'private2'}} |
| 31 | // Even if we suggest an include for private1, we should not do so here. |
| 32 | (void)::private3; // expected-error-re {{{{^}}declaration of 'private3'}} |
| 33 | } |