Michael Zolotukhin | 03e3518 | 2015-02-10 17:54:54 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | ; In this test we check how heuristics for complete unrolling work. We have |
| 2 | ; three knobs: |
| 3 | ; 1) -unroll-threshold |
| 4 | ; 2) -unroll-absolute-threshold and |
| 5 | ; 3) -unroll-percent-of-optimized-for-complete-unroll |
| 6 | ; |
| 7 | ; They control loop-unrolling according to the following rules: |
| 8 | ; * If size of unrolled loop exceeds the absoulte threshold, we don't unroll |
| 9 | ; this loop under any circumstances. |
| 10 | ; * If size of unrolled loop is below the '-unroll-threshold', then we'll |
| 11 | ; consider this loop as a very small one, and completely unroll it. |
| 12 | ; * If a loop size is between these two tresholds, we only do complete unroll |
| 13 | ; it if estimated number of potentially optimized instructions is high (we |
| 14 | ; specify the minimal percent of such instructions). |
| 15 | |
| 16 | ; In this particular test-case, complete unrolling will allow later |
| 17 | ; optimizations to remove ~55% of the instructions, the loop body size is 9, |
| 18 | ; and unrolled size is 65. |
| 19 | |
| 20 | ; RUN: opt < %s -S -loop-unroll -unroll-absolute-threshold=10 -unroll-threshold=10 -unroll-percent-of-optimized-for-complete-unroll=30 | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=TEST1 |
| 21 | ; RUN: opt < %s -S -loop-unroll -unroll-absolute-threshold=100 -unroll-threshold=10 -unroll-percent-of-optimized-for-complete-unroll=30 | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=TEST2 |
| 22 | ; RUN: opt < %s -S -loop-unroll -unroll-absolute-threshold=100 -unroll-threshold=10 -unroll-percent-of-optimized-for-complete-unroll=80 | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=TEST3 |
| 23 | ; RUN: opt < %s -S -loop-unroll -unroll-absolute-threshold=100 -unroll-threshold=100 -unroll-percent-of-optimized-for-complete-unroll=80 | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=TEST4 |
| 24 | |
| 25 | ; If the absolute threshold is too low, or if we can't optimize away requested |
| 26 | ; percent of instructions, we shouldn't unroll: |
| 27 | ; TEST1: %array_const_idx = getelementptr inbounds [9 x i32]* @known_constant, i64 0, i64 %iv |
| 28 | ; TEST3: %array_const_idx = getelementptr inbounds [9 x i32]* @known_constant, i64 0, i64 %iv |
| 29 | |
| 30 | ; Otherwise, we should: |
| 31 | ; TEST2-NOT: %array_const_idx = getelementptr inbounds [9 x i32]* @known_constant, i64 0, i64 %iv |
| 32 | |
| 33 | ; Also, we should unroll if the 'unroll-threshold' is big enough: |
| 34 | ; TEST4-NOT: %array_const_idx = getelementptr inbounds [9 x i32]* @known_constant, i64 0, i64 %iv |
| 35 | target datalayout = "e-m:o-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128" |
| 36 | |
| 37 | @known_constant = internal unnamed_addr constant [9 x i32] [i32 0, i32 -1, i32 0, i32 -1, i32 5, i32 -1, i32 0, i32 -1, i32 0], align 16 |
| 38 | |
| 39 | define i32 @foo(i32* noalias nocapture readonly %src) { |
| 40 | entry: |
| 41 | br label %loop |
| 42 | |
| 43 | loop: ; preds = %loop, %entry |
| 44 | %iv = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %inc, %loop ] |
| 45 | %r = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %add, %loop ] |
| 46 | %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds i32* %src, i64 %iv |
| 47 | %src_element = load i32* %arrayidx, align 4 |
| 48 | %array_const_idx = getelementptr inbounds [9 x i32]* @known_constant, i64 0, i64 %iv |
| 49 | %const_array_element = load i32* %array_const_idx, align 4 |
| 50 | %mul = mul nsw i32 %src_element, %const_array_element |
| 51 | %add = add nsw i32 %mul, %r |
| 52 | %inc = add nuw nsw i64 %iv, 1 |
| 53 | %exitcond86.i = icmp eq i64 %inc, 9 |
| 54 | br i1 %exitcond86.i, label %loop.end, label %loop |
| 55 | |
| 56 | loop.end: ; preds = %loop |
| 57 | %r.lcssa = phi i32 [ %r, %loop ] |
| 58 | ret i32 %r.lcssa |
| 59 | } |