Anna Thomas | 53c8d95 | 2017-05-03 11:47:11 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | ; RUN: opt < %s -loop-deletion -verify-dom-info -S | FileCheck %s |
| 2 | |
| 3 | ; Checking that we can delete loops that are never executed. |
| 4 | ; We do not change the constant conditional branch statement (where the not-taken target |
| 5 | ; is the loop) to an unconditional one. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | ; delete the infinite loop because it is never executed. |
| 8 | define void @test1(i64 %n, i64 %m) nounwind { |
| 9 | ; CHECK-LABEL: test1 |
| 10 | ; CHECK-LABEL: entry: |
| 11 | ; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 true, label %return, label %bb.preheader |
| 12 | ; CHECK-NOT: bb: |
| 13 | entry: |
| 14 | br i1 true, label %return, label %bb |
| 15 | |
| 16 | bb: |
| 17 | %x.0 = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %t0, %bb ] |
| 18 | %t0 = add i64 %x.0, 1 |
| 19 | %t1 = icmp slt i64 %x.0, %n |
| 20 | %t3 = icmp sgt i64 %x.0, %m |
| 21 | %t4 = and i1 %t1, %t3 |
| 22 | br i1 true, label %bb, label %return |
| 23 | |
| 24 | return: |
| 25 | ret void |
| 26 | } |
| 27 | |
| 28 | ; FIXME: We can delete this infinite loop. Currently we do not, |
| 29 | ; because the infinite loop has no exit block. |
| 30 | define void @test2(i64 %n, i64 %m) nounwind { |
| 31 | ; CHECK-LABEL: test2 |
| 32 | ; CHECK-LABEL: entry: |
| 33 | ; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 true, label %return, label %bb.preheader |
| 34 | ; CHECK-LABEL: bb: |
| 35 | ; CHECK: br label %bb |
| 36 | entry: |
| 37 | br i1 true, label %return, label %bb |
| 38 | |
| 39 | bb: |
| 40 | %x.0 = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %t0, %bb ] |
| 41 | %t0 = add i64 %x.0, 1 |
| 42 | %t1 = icmp slt i64 %x.0, %n |
| 43 | %t3 = icmp sgt i64 %x.0, %m |
| 44 | %t4 = and i1 %t1, %t3 |
| 45 | br label %bb |
| 46 | |
| 47 | return: |
| 48 | ret void |
| 49 | } |
| 50 | |
| 51 | ; There are multiple exiting blocks and a single exit block. |
| 52 | ; Since it is a never executed loop, we do not care about the values |
| 53 | ; from different exiting paths and we can |
| 54 | ; delete the loop. |
| 55 | define i64 @test3(i64 %n, i64 %m, i64 %maybe_zero) nounwind { |
| 56 | |
| 57 | ; CHECK-NOT: bb: |
| 58 | ; CHECK-NOT: bb2: |
| 59 | ; CHECK-NOT: bb3: |
| 60 | ; CHECK-LABEL: return.loopexit: |
| 61 | ; CHECK-NEXT: %x.lcssa.ph = phi i64 [ undef, %bb.preheader ] |
| 62 | ; CHECK-NEXT: br label %return |
| 63 | ; CHECK-LABEL: return: |
| 64 | ; CHECK-NEXT: %x.lcssa = phi i64 [ 20, %entry ], [ %x.lcssa.ph, %return.loopexit ] |
| 65 | ; CHECK-NEXT: ret i64 %x.lcssa |
| 66 | entry: |
| 67 | br i1 false, label %bb, label %return |
| 68 | |
| 69 | bb: |
| 70 | %x.0 = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %t0, %bb3 ] |
| 71 | %t0 = add i64 %x.0, 1 |
| 72 | %t1 = icmp slt i64 %x.0, %n |
| 73 | br i1 %t1, label %bb2, label %return |
| 74 | |
| 75 | bb2: |
| 76 | %t2 = icmp slt i64 %x.0, %m |
| 77 | %unused1 = udiv i64 42, %maybe_zero |
| 78 | br i1 %t2, label %bb3, label %return |
| 79 | |
| 80 | bb3: |
| 81 | %t3 = icmp slt i64 %x.0, %m |
| 82 | %unused2 = sdiv i64 42, %maybe_zero |
| 83 | br i1 %t3, label %bb, label %return |
| 84 | |
| 85 | return: |
| 86 | ; the only valid value fo x.lcssa is 20. |
| 87 | %x.lcssa = phi i64 [ 12, %bb ], [ 14, %bb2 ], [ 16, %bb3 ], [20, %entry ] |
| 88 | ret i64 %x.lcssa |
| 89 | } |
| 90 | |
| 91 | ; Cannot delete the loop, since it may be executed at runtime. |
| 92 | define void @test4(i64 %n, i64 %m, i1 %cond) { |
| 93 | ; CHECK-LABEL: test4 |
| 94 | ; CHECK-LABEL: bb: |
| 95 | entry: |
| 96 | br i1 %cond, label %looppred1, label %looppred2 |
| 97 | |
| 98 | looppred1: |
| 99 | br i1 true, label %return, label %bb |
| 100 | |
| 101 | looppred2: |
| 102 | br i1 false, label %return, label %bb |
| 103 | |
| 104 | bb: |
| 105 | %x.0 = phi i64 [ 0, %looppred1 ], [ 1, %looppred2 ], [ %t0, %bb ] |
| 106 | %t0 = add i64 %x.0, 1 |
| 107 | %t1 = icmp slt i64 %x.0, %n |
| 108 | %t3 = icmp sgt i64 %x.0, %m |
| 109 | %t4 = and i1 %t1, %t3 |
| 110 | br i1 true, label %bb, label %return |
| 111 | |
| 112 | return: |
| 113 | ret void |
| 114 | } |
| 115 | |
| 116 | ; multiple constant conditional branches with loop not-taken in all cases. |
| 117 | define void @test5(i64 %n, i64 %m, i1 %cond) nounwind { |
| 118 | ; CHECK-LABEL: test5 |
| 119 | ; CHECK-LABEL: looppred1: |
| 120 | ; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 true, label %return, label %bb.preheader |
| 121 | ; CHECK-LABEL: looppred2: |
| 122 | ; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 true, label %return, label %bb.preheader |
| 123 | ; CHECK-NOT: bb: |
| 124 | entry: |
| 125 | br i1 %cond, label %looppred1, label %looppred2 |
| 126 | |
| 127 | looppred1: |
| 128 | br i1 true, label %return, label %bb |
| 129 | |
| 130 | looppred2: |
| 131 | br i1 true, label %return, label %bb |
| 132 | |
| 133 | bb: |
| 134 | %x.0 = phi i64 [ 0, %looppred1 ], [ 1, %looppred2 ], [ %t0, %bb ] |
| 135 | %t0 = add i64 %x.0, 1 |
| 136 | %t1 = icmp slt i64 %x.0, %n |
| 137 | %t3 = icmp sgt i64 %x.0, %m |
| 138 | %t4 = and i1 %t1, %t3 |
| 139 | br i1 true, label %bb, label %return |
| 140 | |
| 141 | return: |
| 142 | ret void |
| 143 | } |
| 144 | |
| 145 | ; Don't delete this infinite loop because the loop |
| 146 | ; is executable at runtime. |
| 147 | define void @test6(i64 %n, i64 %m) nounwind { |
| 148 | ; CHECK-LABEL: test6 |
| 149 | ; CHECK-LABEL: entry: |
| 150 | ; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 true, label %bb.preheader, label %bb.preheader |
| 151 | ; CHECK: bb: |
| 152 | entry: |
| 153 | br i1 true, label %bb, label %bb |
| 154 | |
| 155 | bb: |
| 156 | %x.0 = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ 0, %entry ], [ %t0, %bb ] |
| 157 | %t0 = add i64 %x.0, 1 |
| 158 | %t1 = icmp slt i64 %x.0, %n |
| 159 | %t3 = icmp sgt i64 %x.0, %m |
| 160 | %t4 = and i1 %t1, %t3 |
| 161 | br i1 true, label %bb, label %return |
| 162 | |
| 163 | return: |
| 164 | ret void |
| 165 | } |
| 166 | |
| 167 | declare i64 @foo(i64) |
| 168 | ; The loop L2 is never executed and is a subloop, with an |
| 169 | ; exit block that branches back to parent loop. |
| 170 | ; Here we can delete loop L2, while L1 still exists. |
| 171 | define i64 @test7(i64 %n) { |
| 172 | ; CHECK-LABEL: test7 |
| 173 | ; CHECK-LABEL: L1: |
| 174 | ; CHECK: br i1 true, label %L1Latch, label %L2.preheader |
| 175 | ; CHECK-LABEL: L2.preheader: |
| 176 | ; CHECK-NEXT: br label %L1Latch.loopexit |
| 177 | ; CHECK-LABEL: L1Latch.loopexit: |
| 178 | ; CHECK: br label %L1Latch |
| 179 | ; CHECK-LABEL: L1Latch: |
| 180 | ; CHECK-NEXT: %y = phi i64 [ %y.next, %L1 ], [ %y.L2.lcssa, %L1Latch.loopexit ] |
| 181 | ; CHECK: br i1 %cond2, label %exit, label %L1 |
| 182 | entry: |
| 183 | br label %L1 |
| 184 | |
| 185 | L1: |
| 186 | %y.next = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %y.add, %L1Latch ] |
| 187 | br i1 true, label %L1Latch, label %L2 |
| 188 | |
| 189 | L2: |
| 190 | %x = phi i64 [ 0, %L1 ], [ %x.next, %L2 ] |
| 191 | %x.next = add i64 %x, 1 |
| 192 | %y.L2 = call i64 @foo(i64 %x.next) |
| 193 | %cond = icmp slt i64 %x.next, %n |
| 194 | br i1 %cond, label %L2, label %L1Latch |
| 195 | |
| 196 | L1Latch: |
| 197 | %y = phi i64 [ %y.next, %L1 ], [ %y.L2, %L2 ] |
| 198 | %y.add = add i64 %y, %n |
| 199 | %cond2 = icmp eq i64 %y.add, 42 |
| 200 | br i1 %cond2, label %exit, label %L1 |
| 201 | |
| 202 | exit: |
| 203 | ret i64 %y.add |
| 204 | } |
| 205 | |
| 206 | |
| 207 | ; Show recursive deletion of loops. Since we start with subloops and progress outward |
| 208 | ; to parent loop, we first delete the loop L2. Now loop L1 becomes a non-loop since it's backedge |
| 209 | ; from L2's preheader to L1's exit block is never taken. So, L1 gets deleted as well. |
| 210 | define void @test8(i64 %n) { |
| 211 | ; CHECK-LABEL: test8 |
| 212 | ; CHECK-LABEL: entry: |
| 213 | ; CHECK-NEXT: br label %exit |
| 214 | ; CHECK-LABEL: exit: |
| 215 | ; CHECK-NEXT: ret void |
| 216 | entry: |
| 217 | br label %L1 |
| 218 | |
| 219 | L1: |
| 220 | br i1 true, label %exit, label %L2 |
| 221 | |
| 222 | L2: |
| 223 | %x = phi i64 [ 0, %L1 ], [ %x.next, %L2 ] |
| 224 | %x.next = add i64 %x, 1 |
| 225 | %y.L2 = call i64 @foo(i64 %x.next) |
| 226 | %cond = icmp slt i64 %x.next, %n |
| 227 | br i1 %cond, label %L2, label %L1 |
| 228 | |
| 229 | exit: |
| 230 | ret void |
| 231 | } |
| 232 | |
| 233 | |
| 234 | ; Delete a loop (L2) which has subloop (L3). |
| 235 | ; Here we delete loop L2, but leave L3 as is. |
| 236 | ; FIXME: Can delete L3 as well, by iteratively going backward through the single |
| 237 | ; predecessor of L3 until we reach L1's block that guarantees L3 is never |
| 238 | ; executed. |
| 239 | define void @test9(i64 %n) { |
| 240 | ; CHECK-LABEL: test9 |
| 241 | ; CHECK-LABEL: L2.preheader: |
| 242 | ; CHECK-NEXT: br label %L3.preheader |
| 243 | ; CHECK-NOT: L2: |
| 244 | ; CHECK-LABEL: L3.preheader: |
| 245 | ; CHECK-NEXT: %y.L2.lcssa = phi i64 [ undef, %L2.preheader ] |
| 246 | ; CHECK-NEXT: br label %L3 |
| 247 | ; CHECK-LABEL: L3: |
| 248 | ; CHECK: br i1 %cond2, label %L3, label %L1.loopexit |
| 249 | entry: |
| 250 | br label %L1 |
| 251 | |
| 252 | L1: |
| 253 | br i1 true, label %exit, label %L2 |
| 254 | |
| 255 | L2: |
| 256 | %x = phi i64 [ 0, %L1 ], [ %x.next, %L2 ] |
| 257 | %x.next = add i64 %x, 1 |
| 258 | %y.L2 = call i64 @foo(i64 %x.next) |
| 259 | %cond = icmp slt i64 %x.next, %n |
| 260 | br i1 %cond, label %L2, label %L3 |
| 261 | |
| 262 | L3: |
| 263 | %cond2 = icmp slt i64 %y.L2, %n |
| 264 | br i1 %cond2, label %L3, label %L1 |
| 265 | |
| 266 | exit: |
| 267 | ret void |
| 268 | } |
| 269 | |
| 270 | ; We cannot delete L3 because of call within it. |
| 271 | ; Since L3 is not deleted, and entirely contained within L2, L2 is also not |
| 272 | ; deleted. |
| 273 | ; FIXME: We can delete unexecutable loops having |
| 274 | ; subloops contained entirely within them. |
| 275 | define void @test10(i64 %n) { |
| 276 | ; CHECK-LABEL: test10 |
| 277 | ; CHECK: L2: |
| 278 | ; CHECK: L3: |
| 279 | entry: |
| 280 | br label %L1 |
| 281 | |
| 282 | L1: |
| 283 | br i1 true, label %exit, label %L2 |
| 284 | |
| 285 | L2: |
| 286 | %x = phi i64 [ 0, %L1 ], [ %x.next, %L3 ] |
| 287 | %x.next = add i64 %x, 1 |
| 288 | %y.L2 = call i64 @foo(i64 %x.next) |
| 289 | %cond = icmp slt i64 %x.next, %n |
| 290 | br i1 %cond, label %L1, label %L3 |
| 291 | |
| 292 | L3: |
| 293 | %y.L3 = phi i64 [ %y.L2, %L2 ], [ %y.L3.next, %L3 ] |
| 294 | %y.L3.next = add i64 %y.L3, 1 |
| 295 | %dummy = call i64 @foo(i64 %y.L3.next) |
| 296 | %cond2 = icmp slt i64 %y.L3, %n |
| 297 | br i1 %cond2, label %L3, label %L2 |
| 298 | |
| 299 | exit: |
| 300 | ret void |
| 301 | } |
| 302 | |
| 303 | ; same as test10, but L3 does not contain call. |
| 304 | ; So, in the first iteration, all statements of L3 are made invariant, and L3 is |
| 305 | ; deleted. |
| 306 | ; In the next iteration, since L2 is never executed and has no subloops, we delete |
| 307 | ; L2 as well. Finally, the outermost loop L1 is deleted. |
| 308 | define void @test11(i64 %n) { |
| 309 | ; CHECK-LABEL: test11 |
| 310 | ; CHECK-LABEL: entry: |
| 311 | ; CHECK-NEXT: br label %exit |
| 312 | ; CHECK-LABEL: exit: |
| 313 | ; CHECK-NEXT: ret void |
| 314 | entry: |
| 315 | br label %L1 |
| 316 | |
| 317 | L1: |
| 318 | br i1 true, label %exit, label %L2 |
| 319 | |
| 320 | L2: |
| 321 | %x = phi i64 [ 0, %L1 ], [ %x.next, %L3 ] |
| 322 | %x.next = add i64 %x, 1 |
| 323 | %y.L2 = call i64 @foo(i64 %x.next) |
| 324 | %cond = icmp slt i64 %x.next, %n |
| 325 | br i1 %cond, label %L1, label %L3 |
| 326 | |
| 327 | L3: |
| 328 | %y.L3 = phi i64 [ %y.L2, %L2 ], [ %y.L3.next, %L3 ] |
| 329 | %y.L3.next = add i64 %y.L3, 1 |
| 330 | %cond2 = icmp slt i64 %y.L3, %n |
| 331 | br i1 %cond2, label %L3, label %L2 |
| 332 | |
| 333 | exit: |
| 334 | ret void |
| 335 | } |
| 336 | |
Anna Thomas | 72c90c8 | 2017-06-22 20:20:56 +0000 | [diff] [blame] | 337 | |
| 338 | ; 2 edges from a single exiting block to the exit block. |
| 339 | define i64 @test12(i64 %n){ |
| 340 | ;CHECK-LABEL: @test12 |
| 341 | ; CHECK-NOT: L1: |
| 342 | ; CHECK-NOT: L1Latch: |
| 343 | ; CHECK-LABEL: L1.preheader: |
| 344 | ; CHECK-NEXT: br label %exit |
| 345 | ; CHECK-LABEL: exit: |
| 346 | ; CHECK-NEXT: %y.phi = phi i64 [ undef, %L1.preheader ] |
| 347 | ; CHECK-NEXT: ret i64 %y.phi |
| 348 | |
| 349 | entry: |
| 350 | br i1 true, label %exit1, label %L1 |
| 351 | |
| 352 | exit1: |
| 353 | ret i64 42 |
| 354 | |
| 355 | L1: ; preds = %L1Latch, %entry |
| 356 | %y.next = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %y.add, %L1Latch ] |
| 357 | br i1 true, label %L1Latch, label %exit |
| 358 | |
| 359 | L1Latch: ; preds = %L1 |
| 360 | %y = phi i64 [ %y.next, %L1 ] |
| 361 | %y.add = add i64 %y, %n |
| 362 | %cond2 = icmp eq i64 %y.add, 42 |
| 363 | switch i64 %n, label %L1 [ |
| 364 | i64 10, label %exit |
| 365 | i64 20, label %exit |
| 366 | ] |
| 367 | |
| 368 | exit: ; preds = %L1Latch, %L1Latch |
| 369 | %y.phi = phi i64 [ 10, %L1Latch ], [ 10, %L1Latch ], [ %y.next, %L1] |
| 370 | ret i64 %y.phi |
| 371 | } |
| 372 | |
| 373 | ; multiple edges to exit block from the same exiting blocks |
| 374 | define i64 @test13(i64 %n) { |
| 375 | ; CHECK-LABEL: @test13 |
| 376 | ; CHECK-NOT: L1: |
| 377 | ; CHECK-NOT: L1Latch: |
| 378 | ; CHECK-LABEL: L1.preheader: |
| 379 | ; CHECK-NEXT: br label %exit |
| 380 | ; CHECK-LABEL: exit: |
| 381 | ; CHECK-NEXT: %y.phi = phi i64 [ undef, %L1.preheader ] |
| 382 | ; CHECK-NEXT: ret i64 %y.phi |
| 383 | |
| 384 | entry: |
| 385 | br i1 true, label %exit1, label %L1 |
| 386 | |
| 387 | exit1: |
| 388 | ret i64 42 |
| 389 | |
| 390 | L1: ; preds = %L1Latch, %entry |
| 391 | %y.next = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %y.add, %L1Latch ] |
| 392 | br i1 true, label %L1Block, label %exit |
| 393 | |
| 394 | L1Block: ; preds = %L1 |
| 395 | %y = phi i64 [ %y.next, %L1 ] |
| 396 | %y.add = add i64 %y, %n |
| 397 | %cond2 = icmp eq i64 %y.add, 42 |
| 398 | switch i64 %n, label %L1Latch [ |
| 399 | i64 10, label %exit |
| 400 | i64 20, label %exit |
| 401 | ] |
| 402 | |
| 403 | L1Latch: |
| 404 | switch i64 %n, label %L1 [ |
| 405 | i64 30, label %exit |
| 406 | i64 40, label %exit |
| 407 | ] |
| 408 | |
| 409 | exit: ; preds = %L1Block, %L1, %L1Latch |
| 410 | %y.phi = phi i64 [ 10, %L1Block ], [ 10, %L1Block ], [ %y.next, %L1 ], [ 30, %L1Latch ], [ 30, %L1Latch ] |
| 411 | ret i64 %y.phi |
| 412 | } |