//===- ThreadSafetyLogical.cpp ---------------------------------*- C++ --*-===// | |
// | |
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure | |
// | |
// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source | |
// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details. | |
// | |
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// | |
// This file defines a representation for logical expressions with SExpr leaves | |
// that are used as part of fact-checking capability expressions. | |
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// | |
#include "clang/Analysis/Analyses/ThreadSafetyLogical.h" | |
using namespace llvm; | |
using namespace clang::threadSafety::lexpr; | |
// Implication. We implement De Morgan's Laws by maintaining LNeg and RNeg | |
// to keep track of whether LHS and RHS are negated. | |
static bool implies(const LExpr *LHS, bool LNeg, const LExpr *RHS, bool RNeg) { | |
// In comments below, we write => for implication. | |
// Calculates the logical AND implication operator. | |
const auto LeftAndOperator = [=](const BinOp *A) { | |
return implies(A->left(), LNeg, RHS, RNeg) && | |
implies(A->right(), LNeg, RHS, RNeg); | |
}; | |
const auto RightAndOperator = [=](const BinOp *A) { | |
return implies(LHS, LNeg, A->left(), RNeg) && | |
implies(LHS, LNeg, A->right(), RNeg); | |
}; | |
// Calculates the logical OR implication operator. | |
const auto LeftOrOperator = [=](const BinOp *A) { | |
return implies(A->left(), LNeg, RHS, RNeg) || | |
implies(A->right(), LNeg, RHS, RNeg); | |
}; | |
const auto RightOrOperator = [=](const BinOp *A) { | |
return implies(LHS, LNeg, A->left(), RNeg) || | |
implies(LHS, LNeg, A->right(), RNeg); | |
}; | |
// Recurse on right. | |
switch (RHS->kind()) { | |
case LExpr::And: | |
// When performing right recursion: | |
// C => A & B [if] C => A and C => B | |
// When performing right recursion (negated): | |
// C => !(A & B) [if] C => !A | !B [===] C => !A or C => !B | |
return RNeg ? RightOrOperator(cast<And>(RHS)) | |
: RightAndOperator(cast<And>(RHS)); | |
case LExpr::Or: | |
// When performing right recursion: | |
// C => (A | B) [if] C => A or C => B | |
// When performing right recursion (negated): | |
// C => !(A | B) [if] C => !A & !B [===] C => !A and C => !B | |
return RNeg ? RightAndOperator(cast<Or>(RHS)) | |
: RightOrOperator(cast<Or>(RHS)); | |
case LExpr::Not: | |
// Note that C => !A is very different from !(C => A). It would be incorrect | |
// to return !implies(LHS, RHS). | |
return implies(LHS, LNeg, cast<Not>(RHS)->exp(), !RNeg); | |
case LExpr::Terminal: | |
// After reaching the terminal, it's time to recurse on the left. | |
break; | |
} | |
// RHS is now a terminal. Recurse on Left. | |
switch (LHS->kind()) { | |
case LExpr::And: | |
// When performing left recursion: | |
// A & B => C [if] A => C or B => C | |
// When performing left recursion (negated): | |
// !(A & B) => C [if] !A | !B => C [===] !A => C and !B => C | |
return LNeg ? LeftAndOperator(cast<And>(LHS)) | |
: LeftOrOperator(cast<And>(LHS)); | |
case LExpr::Or: | |
// When performing left recursion: | |
// A | B => C [if] A => C and B => C | |
// When performing left recursion (negated): | |
// !(A | B) => C [if] !A & !B => C [===] !A => C or !B => C | |
return LNeg ? LeftOrOperator(cast<Or>(LHS)) | |
: LeftAndOperator(cast<Or>(LHS)); | |
case LExpr::Not: | |
// Note that A => !C is very different from !(A => C). It would be incorrect | |
// to return !implies(LHS, RHS). | |
return implies(cast<Not>(LHS)->exp(), !LNeg, RHS, RNeg); | |
case LExpr::Terminal: | |
// After reaching the terminal, it's time to perform identity comparisons. | |
break; | |
} | |
// A => A | |
// !A => !A | |
if (LNeg != RNeg) | |
return false; | |
// FIXME -- this should compare SExprs for equality, not pointer equality. | |
return cast<Terminal>(LHS)->expr() == cast<Terminal>(RHS)->expr(); | |
} | |
namespace clang { | |
namespace threadSafety { | |
namespace lexpr { | |
bool implies(const LExpr *LHS, const LExpr *RHS) { | |
// Start out by assuming that LHS and RHS are not negated. | |
return ::implies(LHS, false, RHS, false); | |
} | |
} | |
} | |
} |