blob: 5a60d60ae3df0aaa183091be2d3972bd5c59a45f [file] [log] [blame]
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +00001FileCheck - Flexible pattern matching file verifier
2===================================================
3
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +00004SYNOPSIS
5--------
6
Dmitri Gribenkoc8c3dbd2012-11-29 19:21:02 +00007:program:`FileCheck` *match-filename* [*--check-prefix=XXX*] [*--strict-whitespace*]
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +00008
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +00009DESCRIPTION
10-----------
11
Dmitri Gribenkoc8c3dbd2012-11-29 19:21:02 +000012:program:`FileCheck` reads two files (one from standard input, and one
13specified on the command line) and uses one to verify the other. This
14behavior is particularly useful for the testsuite, which wants to verify that
15the output of some tool (e.g. :program:`llc`) contains the expected information
16(for example, a movsd from esp or whatever is interesting). This is similar to
17using :program:`grep`, but it is optimized for matching multiple different
18inputs in one file in a specific order.
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +000019
Dmitri Gribenkoc8c3dbd2012-11-29 19:21:02 +000020The ``match-filename`` file specifies the file that contains the patterns to
Stephen Lineeea96d2013-07-14 18:12:25 +000021match. The file to verify is read from standard input unless the
22:option:`--input-file` option is used.
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +000023
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +000024OPTIONS
25-------
26
Dmitri Gribenkoc8c3dbd2012-11-29 19:21:02 +000027.. option:: -help
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +000028
29 Print a summary of command line options.
30
Dmitri Gribenkoc8c3dbd2012-11-29 19:21:02 +000031.. option:: --check-prefix prefix
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +000032
Matt Arsenaultee4f5ea2013-11-10 02:04:09 +000033 FileCheck searches the contents of ``match-filename`` for patterns to
34 match. By default, these patterns are prefixed with "``CHECK:``".
35 If you'd like to use a different prefix (e.g. because the same input
36 file is checking multiple different tool or options), the
37 :option:`--check-prefix` argument allows you to specify one or more
38 prefixes to match. Multiple prefixes are useful for tests which might
39 change for different run options, but most lines remain the same.
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +000040
Dmitri Gribenkoc8c3dbd2012-11-29 19:21:02 +000041.. option:: --input-file filename
Eli Benderskyc78bb702012-11-07 01:41:30 +000042
43 File to check (defaults to stdin).
44
Dmitri Gribenkoc8c3dbd2012-11-29 19:21:02 +000045.. option:: --strict-whitespace
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +000046
47 By default, FileCheck canonicalizes input horizontal whitespace (spaces and
48 tabs) which causes it to ignore these differences (a space will match a tab).
Guy Benyei4cc74fc2013-02-06 20:40:38 +000049 The :option:`--strict-whitespace` argument disables this behavior. End-of-line
Sean Silvaa5706fc2013-06-21 00:27:54 +000050 sequences are canonicalized to UNIX-style ``\n`` in all modes.
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +000051
Dmitri Gribenkoc8c3dbd2012-11-29 19:21:02 +000052.. option:: -version
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +000053
54 Show the version number of this program.
55
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +000056EXIT STATUS
57-----------
58
Dmitri Gribenkoc8c3dbd2012-11-29 19:21:02 +000059If :program:`FileCheck` verifies that the file matches the expected contents,
60it exits with 0. Otherwise, if not, or if an error occurs, it will exit with a
61non-zero value.
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +000062
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +000063TUTORIAL
64--------
65
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +000066FileCheck is typically used from LLVM regression tests, being invoked on the RUN
67line of the test. A simple example of using FileCheck from a RUN line looks
68like this:
69
Dmitri Gribenko0d887a02012-06-12 15:45:07 +000070.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +000071
72 ; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -march=x86-64 | FileCheck %s
73
Dmitri Gribenko0fab1912012-11-14 19:42:32 +000074This syntax says to pipe the current file ("``%s``") into ``llvm-as``, pipe
75that into ``llc``, then pipe the output of ``llc`` into ``FileCheck``. This
76means that FileCheck will be verifying its standard input (the llc output)
77against the filename argument specified (the original ``.ll`` file specified by
78"``%s``"). To see how this works, let's look at the rest of the ``.ll`` file
79(after the RUN line):
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +000080
Dmitri Gribenko0d887a02012-06-12 15:45:07 +000081.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +000082
83 define void @sub1(i32* %p, i32 %v) {
84 entry:
85 ; CHECK: sub1:
86 ; CHECK: subl
87 %0 = tail call i32 @llvm.atomic.load.sub.i32.p0i32(i32* %p, i32 %v)
88 ret void
89 }
90
91 define void @inc4(i64* %p) {
92 entry:
93 ; CHECK: inc4:
94 ; CHECK: incq
95 %0 = tail call i64 @llvm.atomic.load.add.i64.p0i64(i64* %p, i64 1)
96 ret void
97 }
98
Dmitri Gribenko0fab1912012-11-14 19:42:32 +000099Here you can see some "``CHECK:``" lines specified in comments. Now you can
100see how the file is piped into ``llvm-as``, then ``llc``, and the machine code
101output is what we are verifying. FileCheck checks the machine code output to
102verify that it matches what the "``CHECK:``" lines specify.
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000103
Dmitri Gribenko0fab1912012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000104The syntax of the "``CHECK:``" lines is very simple: they are fixed strings that
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000105must occur in order. FileCheck defaults to ignoring horizontal whitespace
106differences (e.g. a space is allowed to match a tab) but otherwise, the contents
Dmitri Gribenko0fab1912012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000107of the "``CHECK:``" line is required to match some thing in the test file exactly.
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000108
109One nice thing about FileCheck (compared to grep) is that it allows merging
110test cases together into logical groups. For example, because the test above
Dmitri Gribenko0fab1912012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000111is checking for the "``sub1:``" and "``inc4:``" labels, it will not match
112unless there is a "``subl``" in between those labels. If it existed somewhere
113else in the file, that would not count: "``grep subl``" matches if "``subl``"
114exists anywhere in the file.
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000115
116The FileCheck -check-prefix option
117~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
118
Dmitri Gribenkoc8c3dbd2012-11-29 19:21:02 +0000119The FileCheck :option:`-check-prefix` option allows multiple test
120configurations to be driven from one `.ll` file. This is useful in many
121circumstances, for example, testing different architectural variants with
122:program:`llc`. Here's a simple example:
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000123
Dmitri Gribenko0d887a02012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000124.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000125
126 ; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -mtriple=i686-apple-darwin9 -mattr=sse41 \
Dmitri Gribenko32f9bca2012-06-12 00:48:47 +0000127 ; RUN: | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=X32
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000128 ; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -mtriple=x86_64-apple-darwin9 -mattr=sse41 \
Dmitri Gribenko32f9bca2012-06-12 00:48:47 +0000129 ; RUN: | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=X64
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000130
131 define <4 x i32> @pinsrd_1(i32 %s, <4 x i32> %tmp) nounwind {
132 %tmp1 = insertelement <4 x i32>; %tmp, i32 %s, i32 1
133 ret <4 x i32> %tmp1
134 ; X32: pinsrd_1:
135 ; X32: pinsrd $1, 4(%esp), %xmm0
136
137 ; X64: pinsrd_1:
138 ; X64: pinsrd $1, %edi, %xmm0
139 }
140
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000141In this case, we're testing that we get the expected code generation with
142both 32-bit and 64-bit code generation.
143
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000144The "CHECK-NEXT:" directive
145~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
146
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000147Sometimes you want to match lines and would like to verify that matches
148happen on exactly consecutive lines with no other lines in between them. In
Dmitri Gribenko0fab1912012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000149this case, you can use "``CHECK:``" and "``CHECK-NEXT:``" directives to specify
150this. If you specified a custom check prefix, just use "``<PREFIX>-NEXT:``".
151For example, something like this works as you'd expect:
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000152
Dmitri Gribenko0d887a02012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000153.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000154
Dmitri Gribenko32f9bca2012-06-12 00:48:47 +0000155 define void @t2(<2 x double>* %r, <2 x double>* %A, double %B) {
156 %tmp3 = load <2 x double>* %A, align 16
157 %tmp7 = insertelement <2 x double> undef, double %B, i32 0
158 %tmp9 = shufflevector <2 x double> %tmp3,
159 <2 x double> %tmp7,
160 <2 x i32> < i32 0, i32 2 >
161 store <2 x double> %tmp9, <2 x double>* %r, align 16
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000162 ret void
163
164 ; CHECK: t2:
165 ; CHECK: movl 8(%esp), %eax
166 ; CHECK-NEXT: movapd (%eax), %xmm0
167 ; CHECK-NEXT: movhpd 12(%esp), %xmm0
168 ; CHECK-NEXT: movl 4(%esp), %eax
169 ; CHECK-NEXT: movapd %xmm0, (%eax)
170 ; CHECK-NEXT: ret
171 }
172
Dmitri Gribenko0fab1912012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000173"``CHECK-NEXT:``" directives reject the input unless there is exactly one
Eli Bendersky17ced452012-11-21 22:40:52 +0000174newline between it and the previous directive. A "``CHECK-NEXT:``" cannot be
Dmitri Gribenko0fab1912012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000175the first directive in a file.
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000176
177The "CHECK-NOT:" directive
178~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
179
Dmitri Gribenko0fab1912012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000180The "``CHECK-NOT:``" directive is used to verify that a string doesn't occur
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000181between two matches (or before the first match, or after the last match). For
182example, to verify that a load is removed by a transformation, a test like this
183can be used:
184
Dmitri Gribenko0d887a02012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000185.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000186
187 define i8 @coerce_offset0(i32 %V, i32* %P) {
188 store i32 %V, i32* %P
189
190 %P2 = bitcast i32* %P to i8*
191 %P3 = getelementptr i8* %P2, i32 2
192
193 %A = load i8* %P3
194 ret i8 %A
195 ; CHECK: @coerce_offset0
196 ; CHECK-NOT: load
197 ; CHECK: ret i8
198 }
199
Michael Liao95ab3262013-05-14 20:34:12 +0000200The "CHECK-DAG:" directive
201~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
202
203If it's necessary to match strings that don't occur in a strictly sequential
204order, "``CHECK-DAG:``" could be used to verify them between two matches (or
205before the first match, or after the last match). For example, clang emits
206vtable globals in reverse order. Using ``CHECK-DAG:``, we can keep the checks
207in the natural order:
208
209.. code-block:: c++
210
211 // RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -emit-llvm -o - | FileCheck %s
212
213 struct Foo { virtual void method(); };
214 Foo f; // emit vtable
215 // CHECK-DAG: @_ZTV3Foo =
216
217 struct Bar { virtual void method(); };
218 Bar b;
219 // CHECK-DAG: @_ZTV3Bar =
220
Renato Golinf02062f2013-10-11 18:50:22 +0000221``CHECK-NOT:`` directives could be mixed with ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives to
222exclude strings between the surrounding ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives. As a result,
223the surrounding ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives cannot be reordered, i.e. all
224occurrences matching ``CHECK-DAG:`` before ``CHECK-NOT:`` must not fall behind
225occurrences matching ``CHECK-DAG:`` after ``CHECK-NOT:``. For example,
226
227.. code-block:: llvm
228
229 ; CHECK-DAG: BEFORE
230 ; CHECK-NOT: NOT
231 ; CHECK-DAG: AFTER
232
233This case will reject input strings where ``BEFORE`` occurs after ``AFTER``.
Michael Liao95ab3262013-05-14 20:34:12 +0000234
235With captured variables, ``CHECK-DAG:`` is able to match valid topological
236orderings of a DAG with edges from the definition of a variable to its use.
237It's useful, e.g., when your test cases need to match different output
238sequences from the instruction scheduler. For example,
239
240.. code-block:: llvm
241
242 ; CHECK-DAG: add [[REG1:r[0-9]+]], r1, r2
243 ; CHECK-DAG: add [[REG2:r[0-9]+]], r3, r4
244 ; CHECK: mul r5, [[REG1]], [[REG2]]
245
246In this case, any order of that two ``add`` instructions will be allowed.
247
Renato Golinf02062f2013-10-11 18:50:22 +0000248If you are defining `and` using variables in the same ``CHECK-DAG:`` block,
249be aware that the definition rule can match `after` its use.
250
251So, for instance, the code below will pass:
Michael Liao95ab3262013-05-14 20:34:12 +0000252
253.. code-block:: llvm
254
Renato Golinf02062f2013-10-11 18:50:22 +0000255 ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2:d[0-9]+]][0]
256 ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2]][1]
257 vmov.32 d0[1]
258 vmov.32 d0[0]
Michael Liao95ab3262013-05-14 20:34:12 +0000259
Renato Golinf02062f2013-10-11 18:50:22 +0000260While this other code, will not:
261
262.. code-block:: llvm
263
264 ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2:d[0-9]+]][0]
265 ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2]][1]
266 vmov.32 d1[1]
267 vmov.32 d0[0]
268
269While this can be very useful, it's also dangerous, because in the case of
270register sequence, you must have a strong order (read before write, copy before
271use, etc). If the definition your test is looking for doesn't match (because
272of a bug in the compiler), it may match further away from the use, and mask
273real bugs away.
274
275In those cases, to enforce the order, use a non-DAG directive between DAG-blocks.
Michael Liao95ab3262013-05-14 20:34:12 +0000276
Stephen Lin178504b2013-07-12 14:51:05 +0000277The "CHECK-LABEL:" directive
Bill Wendlingd6a721b2013-07-30 08:26:24 +0000278~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Stephen Lin178504b2013-07-12 14:51:05 +0000279
280Sometimes in a file containing multiple tests divided into logical blocks, one
281or more ``CHECK:`` directives may inadvertently succeed by matching lines in a
282later block. While an error will usually eventually be generated, the check
283flagged as causing the error may not actually bear any relationship to the
284actual source of the problem.
285
286In order to produce better error messages in these cases, the "``CHECK-LABEL:``"
287directive can be used. It is treated identically to a normal ``CHECK``
Stephen Lind6392062013-07-18 23:26:58 +0000288directive except that FileCheck makes an additional assumption that a line
289matched by the directive cannot also be matched by any other check present in
290``match-filename``; this is intended to be used for lines containing labels or
291other unique identifiers. Conceptually, the presence of ``CHECK-LABEL`` divides
292the input stream into separate blocks, each of which is processed independently,
293preventing a ``CHECK:`` directive in one block matching a line in another block.
294For example,
Stephen Lin178504b2013-07-12 14:51:05 +0000295
296.. code-block:: llvm
297
298 define %struct.C* @C_ctor_base(%struct.C* %this, i32 %x) {
299 entry:
300 ; CHECK-LABEL: C_ctor_base:
301 ; CHECK: mov [[SAVETHIS:r[0-9]+]], r0
302 ; CHECK: bl A_ctor_base
303 ; CHECK: mov r0, [[SAVETHIS]]
304 %0 = bitcast %struct.C* %this to %struct.A*
305 %call = tail call %struct.A* @A_ctor_base(%struct.A* %0)
306 %1 = bitcast %struct.C* %this to %struct.B*
307 %call2 = tail call %struct.B* @B_ctor_base(%struct.B* %1, i32 %x)
308 ret %struct.C* %this
309 }
310
311 define %struct.D* @D_ctor_base(%struct.D* %this, i32 %x) {
312 entry:
313 ; CHECK-LABEL: D_ctor_base:
314
315The use of ``CHECK-LABEL:`` directives in this case ensures that the three
316``CHECK:`` directives only accept lines corresponding to the body of the
317``@C_ctor_base`` function, even if the patterns match lines found later in
Stephen Lind6392062013-07-18 23:26:58 +0000318the file. Furthermore, if one of these three ``CHECK:`` directives fail,
319FileCheck will recover by continuing to the next block, allowing multiple test
320failures to be detected in a single invocation.
Stephen Lin178504b2013-07-12 14:51:05 +0000321
322There is no requirement that ``CHECK-LABEL:`` directives contain strings that
323correspond to actual syntactic labels in a source or output language: they must
324simply uniquely match a single line in the file being verified.
325
326``CHECK-LABEL:`` directives cannot contain variable definitions or uses.
327
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000328FileCheck Pattern Matching Syntax
329~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
330
Dmitri Gribenko0fab1912012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000331The "``CHECK:``" and "``CHECK-NOT:``" directives both take a pattern to match.
332For most uses of FileCheck, fixed string matching is perfectly sufficient. For
333some things, a more flexible form of matching is desired. To support this,
334FileCheck allows you to specify regular expressions in matching strings,
335surrounded by double braces: ``{{yourregex}}``. Because we want to use fixed
336string matching for a majority of what we do, FileCheck has been designed to
337support mixing and matching fixed string matching with regular expressions.
338This allows you to write things like this:
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000339
Dmitri Gribenko0d887a02012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000340.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000341
342 ; CHECK: movhpd {{[0-9]+}}(%esp), {{%xmm[0-7]}}
343
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000344In this case, any offset from the ESP register will be allowed, and any xmm
345register will be allowed.
346
347Because regular expressions are enclosed with double braces, they are
348visually distinct, and you don't need to use escape characters within the double
349braces like you would in C. In the rare case that you want to match double
350braces explicitly from the input, you can use something ugly like
Dmitri Gribenko0fab1912012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000351``{{[{][{]}}`` as your pattern.
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000352
353FileCheck Variables
354~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
355
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000356It is often useful to match a pattern and then verify that it occurs again
357later in the file. For codegen tests, this can be useful to allow any register,
Eli Benderskyed04fd22012-12-01 22:03:57 +0000358but verify that that register is used consistently later. To do this,
359:program:`FileCheck` allows named variables to be defined and substituted into
360patterns. Here is a simple example:
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000361
Dmitri Gribenko0d887a02012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000362.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000363
364 ; CHECK: test5:
365 ; CHECK: notw [[REGISTER:%[a-z]+]]
Chad Rosierd6d05e32012-05-24 21:17:47 +0000366 ; CHECK: andw {{.*}}[[REGISTER]]
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000367
Dmitri Gribenko0fab1912012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000368The first check line matches a regex ``%[a-z]+`` and captures it into the
369variable ``REGISTER``. The second line verifies that whatever is in
Eli Benderskyed04fd22012-12-01 22:03:57 +0000370``REGISTER`` occurs later in the file after an "``andw``". :program:`FileCheck`
371variable references are always contained in ``[[ ]]`` pairs, and their names can
372be formed with the regex ``[a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z0-9]*``. If a colon follows the name,
Dmitri Gribenko0fab1912012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000373then it is a definition of the variable; otherwise, it is a use.
Daniel Dunbar3b709d52012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000374
Eli Benderskyed04fd22012-12-01 22:03:57 +0000375:program:`FileCheck` variables can be defined multiple times, and uses always
376get the latest value. Variables can also be used later on the same line they
377were defined on. For example:
378
379.. code-block:: llvm
380
381 ; CHECK: op [[REG:r[0-9]+]], [[REG]]
382
383Can be useful if you want the operands of ``op`` to be the same register,
384and don't care exactly which register it is.
Dmitri Gribenko0fab1912012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000385
Alexander Kornienko70a870a2012-11-14 21:07:37 +0000386FileCheck Expressions
387~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
388
Dmitri Gribenkoc8c3dbd2012-11-29 19:21:02 +0000389Sometimes there's a need to verify output which refers line numbers of the
390match file, e.g. when testing compiler diagnostics. This introduces a certain
391fragility of the match file structure, as "``CHECK:``" lines contain absolute
392line numbers in the same file, which have to be updated whenever line numbers
393change due to text addition or deletion.
Alexander Kornienko70a870a2012-11-14 21:07:37 +0000394
395To support this case, FileCheck allows using ``[[@LINE]]``,
396``[[@LINE+<offset>]]``, ``[[@LINE-<offset>]]`` expressions in patterns. These
397expressions expand to a number of the line where a pattern is located (with an
398optional integer offset).
399
400This way match patterns can be put near the relevant test lines and include
401relative line number references, for example:
402
403.. code-block:: c++
404
405 // CHECK: test.cpp:[[@LINE+4]]:6: error: expected ';' after top level declarator
406 // CHECK-NEXT: {{^int a}}
407 // CHECK-NEXT: {{^ \^}}
408 // CHECK-NEXT: {{^ ;}}
409 int a
410