blob: 6013c751156fe81bee30536bef27bab7792eb1bb [file] [log] [blame]
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001/*
2 * linux/ipc/sem.c
3 * Copyright (C) 1992 Krishna Balasubramanian
4 * Copyright (C) 1995 Eric Schenk, Bruno Haible
5 *
6 * IMPLEMENTATION NOTES ON CODE REWRITE (Eric Schenk, January 1995):
7 * This code underwent a massive rewrite in order to solve some problems
8 * with the original code. In particular the original code failed to
9 * wake up processes that were waiting for semval to go to 0 if the
10 * value went to 0 and was then incremented rapidly enough. In solving
11 * this problem I have also modified the implementation so that it
12 * processes pending operations in a FIFO manner, thus give a guarantee
13 * that processes waiting for a lock on the semaphore won't starve
14 * unless another locking process fails to unlock.
15 * In addition the following two changes in behavior have been introduced:
16 * - The original implementation of semop returned the value
17 * last semaphore element examined on success. This does not
18 * match the manual page specifications, and effectively
19 * allows the user to read the semaphore even if they do not
20 * have read permissions. The implementation now returns 0
21 * on success as stated in the manual page.
22 * - There is some confusion over whether the set of undo adjustments
23 * to be performed at exit should be done in an atomic manner.
24 * That is, if we are attempting to decrement the semval should we queue
25 * up and wait until we can do so legally?
26 * The original implementation attempted to do this.
27 * The current implementation does not do so. This is because I don't
28 * think it is the right thing (TM) to do, and because I couldn't
29 * see a clean way to get the old behavior with the new design.
30 * The POSIX standard and SVID should be consulted to determine
31 * what behavior is mandated.
32 *
33 * Further notes on refinement (Christoph Rohland, December 1998):
34 * - The POSIX standard says, that the undo adjustments simply should
35 * redo. So the current implementation is o.K.
36 * - The previous code had two flaws:
37 * 1) It actively gave the semaphore to the next waiting process
38 * sleeping on the semaphore. Since this process did not have the
39 * cpu this led to many unnecessary context switches and bad
40 * performance. Now we only check which process should be able to
41 * get the semaphore and if this process wants to reduce some
42 * semaphore value we simply wake it up without doing the
43 * operation. So it has to try to get it later. Thus e.g. the
44 * running process may reacquire the semaphore during the current
45 * time slice. If it only waits for zero or increases the semaphore,
46 * we do the operation in advance and wake it up.
47 * 2) It did not wake up all zero waiting processes. We try to do
48 * better but only get the semops right which only wait for zero or
49 * increase. If there are decrement operations in the operations
50 * array we do the same as before.
51 *
52 * With the incarnation of O(1) scheduler, it becomes unnecessary to perform
53 * check/retry algorithm for waking up blocked processes as the new scheduler
54 * is better at handling thread switch than the old one.
55 *
56 * /proc/sysvipc/sem support (c) 1999 Dragos Acostachioaie <dragos@iname.com>
57 *
58 * SMP-threaded, sysctl's added
Christian Kujau624dffc2006-01-15 02:43:54 +010059 * (c) 1999 Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -070060 * Enforced range limit on SEM_UNDO
61 * (c) 2001 Red Hat Inc <alan@redhat.com>
62 * Lockless wakeup
63 * (c) 2003 Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
Steve Grubb073115d2006-04-02 17:07:33 -040064 *
65 * support for audit of ipc object properties and permission changes
66 * Dustin Kirkland <dustin.kirkland@us.ibm.com>
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -070067 */
68
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -070069#include <linux/slab.h>
70#include <linux/spinlock.h>
71#include <linux/init.h>
72#include <linux/proc_fs.h>
73#include <linux/time.h>
74#include <linux/smp_lock.h>
75#include <linux/security.h>
76#include <linux/syscalls.h>
77#include <linux/audit.h>
Randy.Dunlapc59ede72006-01-11 12:17:46 -080078#include <linux/capability.h>
Mike Waychison19b49462005-09-06 15:17:10 -070079#include <linux/seq_file.h>
Ingo Molnar5f921ae2006-03-26 01:37:17 -080080#include <linux/mutex.h>
81
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -070082#include <asm/uaccess.h>
83#include "util.h"
84
85
86#define sem_lock(id) ((struct sem_array*)ipc_lock(&sem_ids,id))
87#define sem_unlock(sma) ipc_unlock(&(sma)->sem_perm)
88#define sem_rmid(id) ((struct sem_array*)ipc_rmid(&sem_ids,id))
89#define sem_checkid(sma, semid) \
90 ipc_checkid(&sem_ids,&sma->sem_perm,semid)
91#define sem_buildid(id, seq) \
92 ipc_buildid(&sem_ids, id, seq)
93static struct ipc_ids sem_ids;
94
95static int newary (key_t, int, int);
96static void freeary (struct sem_array *sma, int id);
97#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
Mike Waychison19b49462005-09-06 15:17:10 -070098static int sysvipc_sem_proc_show(struct seq_file *s, void *it);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -070099#endif
100
101#define SEMMSL_FAST 256 /* 512 bytes on stack */
102#define SEMOPM_FAST 64 /* ~ 372 bytes on stack */
103
104/*
105 * linked list protection:
106 * sem_undo.id_next,
107 * sem_array.sem_pending{,last},
108 * sem_array.sem_undo: sem_lock() for read/write
109 * sem_undo.proc_next: only "current" is allowed to read/write that field.
110 *
111 */
112
113int sem_ctls[4] = {SEMMSL, SEMMNS, SEMOPM, SEMMNI};
114#define sc_semmsl (sem_ctls[0])
115#define sc_semmns (sem_ctls[1])
116#define sc_semopm (sem_ctls[2])
117#define sc_semmni (sem_ctls[3])
118
119static int used_sems;
120
121void __init sem_init (void)
122{
123 used_sems = 0;
124 ipc_init_ids(&sem_ids,sc_semmni);
Mike Waychison19b49462005-09-06 15:17:10 -0700125 ipc_init_proc_interface("sysvipc/sem",
126 " key semid perms nsems uid gid cuid cgid otime ctime\n",
127 &sem_ids,
128 sysvipc_sem_proc_show);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700129}
130
131/*
132 * Lockless wakeup algorithm:
133 * Without the check/retry algorithm a lockless wakeup is possible:
134 * - queue.status is initialized to -EINTR before blocking.
135 * - wakeup is performed by
136 * * unlinking the queue entry from sma->sem_pending
137 * * setting queue.status to IN_WAKEUP
138 * This is the notification for the blocked thread that a
139 * result value is imminent.
140 * * call wake_up_process
141 * * set queue.status to the final value.
142 * - the previously blocked thread checks queue.status:
143 * * if it's IN_WAKEUP, then it must wait until the value changes
144 * * if it's not -EINTR, then the operation was completed by
145 * update_queue. semtimedop can return queue.status without
Ingo Molnar5f921ae2006-03-26 01:37:17 -0800146 * performing any operation on the sem array.
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700147 * * otherwise it must acquire the spinlock and check what's up.
148 *
149 * The two-stage algorithm is necessary to protect against the following
150 * races:
151 * - if queue.status is set after wake_up_process, then the woken up idle
152 * thread could race forward and try (and fail) to acquire sma->lock
153 * before update_queue had a chance to set queue.status
154 * - if queue.status is written before wake_up_process and if the
155 * blocked process is woken up by a signal between writing
156 * queue.status and the wake_up_process, then the woken up
157 * process could return from semtimedop and die by calling
158 * sys_exit before wake_up_process is called. Then wake_up_process
159 * will oops, because the task structure is already invalid.
160 * (yes, this happened on s390 with sysv msg).
161 *
162 */
163#define IN_WAKEUP 1
164
165static int newary (key_t key, int nsems, int semflg)
166{
167 int id;
168 int retval;
169 struct sem_array *sma;
170 int size;
171
172 if (!nsems)
173 return -EINVAL;
174 if (used_sems + nsems > sc_semmns)
175 return -ENOSPC;
176
177 size = sizeof (*sma) + nsems * sizeof (struct sem);
178 sma = ipc_rcu_alloc(size);
179 if (!sma) {
180 return -ENOMEM;
181 }
182 memset (sma, 0, size);
183
184 sma->sem_perm.mode = (semflg & S_IRWXUGO);
185 sma->sem_perm.key = key;
186
187 sma->sem_perm.security = NULL;
188 retval = security_sem_alloc(sma);
189 if (retval) {
190 ipc_rcu_putref(sma);
191 return retval;
192 }
193
194 id = ipc_addid(&sem_ids, &sma->sem_perm, sc_semmni);
195 if(id == -1) {
196 security_sem_free(sma);
197 ipc_rcu_putref(sma);
198 return -ENOSPC;
199 }
200 used_sems += nsems;
201
Mike Waychison19b49462005-09-06 15:17:10 -0700202 sma->sem_id = sem_buildid(id, sma->sem_perm.seq);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700203 sma->sem_base = (struct sem *) &sma[1];
204 /* sma->sem_pending = NULL; */
205 sma->sem_pending_last = &sma->sem_pending;
206 /* sma->undo = NULL; */
207 sma->sem_nsems = nsems;
208 sma->sem_ctime = get_seconds();
209 sem_unlock(sma);
210
Mike Waychison19b49462005-09-06 15:17:10 -0700211 return sma->sem_id;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700212}
213
214asmlinkage long sys_semget (key_t key, int nsems, int semflg)
215{
216 int id, err = -EINVAL;
217 struct sem_array *sma;
218
219 if (nsems < 0 || nsems > sc_semmsl)
220 return -EINVAL;
Ingo Molnar5f921ae2006-03-26 01:37:17 -0800221 mutex_lock(&sem_ids.mutex);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700222
223 if (key == IPC_PRIVATE) {
224 err = newary(key, nsems, semflg);
225 } else if ((id = ipc_findkey(&sem_ids, key)) == -1) { /* key not used */
226 if (!(semflg & IPC_CREAT))
227 err = -ENOENT;
228 else
229 err = newary(key, nsems, semflg);
230 } else if (semflg & IPC_CREAT && semflg & IPC_EXCL) {
231 err = -EEXIST;
232 } else {
233 sma = sem_lock(id);
Eric Sesterhenn27315c92006-03-26 18:28:38 +0200234 BUG_ON(sma==NULL);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700235 if (nsems > sma->sem_nsems)
236 err = -EINVAL;
237 else if (ipcperms(&sma->sem_perm, semflg))
238 err = -EACCES;
239 else {
240 int semid = sem_buildid(id, sma->sem_perm.seq);
241 err = security_sem_associate(sma, semflg);
242 if (!err)
243 err = semid;
244 }
245 sem_unlock(sma);
246 }
247
Ingo Molnar5f921ae2006-03-26 01:37:17 -0800248 mutex_unlock(&sem_ids.mutex);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700249 return err;
250}
251
252/* Manage the doubly linked list sma->sem_pending as a FIFO:
253 * insert new queue elements at the tail sma->sem_pending_last.
254 */
255static inline void append_to_queue (struct sem_array * sma,
256 struct sem_queue * q)
257{
258 *(q->prev = sma->sem_pending_last) = q;
259 *(sma->sem_pending_last = &q->next) = NULL;
260}
261
262static inline void prepend_to_queue (struct sem_array * sma,
263 struct sem_queue * q)
264{
265 q->next = sma->sem_pending;
266 *(q->prev = &sma->sem_pending) = q;
267 if (q->next)
268 q->next->prev = &q->next;
269 else /* sma->sem_pending_last == &sma->sem_pending */
270 sma->sem_pending_last = &q->next;
271}
272
273static inline void remove_from_queue (struct sem_array * sma,
274 struct sem_queue * q)
275{
276 *(q->prev) = q->next;
277 if (q->next)
278 q->next->prev = q->prev;
279 else /* sma->sem_pending_last == &q->next */
280 sma->sem_pending_last = q->prev;
281 q->prev = NULL; /* mark as removed */
282}
283
284/*
285 * Determine whether a sequence of semaphore operations would succeed
286 * all at once. Return 0 if yes, 1 if need to sleep, else return error code.
287 */
288
289static int try_atomic_semop (struct sem_array * sma, struct sembuf * sops,
290 int nsops, struct sem_undo *un, int pid)
291{
292 int result, sem_op;
293 struct sembuf *sop;
294 struct sem * curr;
295
296 for (sop = sops; sop < sops + nsops; sop++) {
297 curr = sma->sem_base + sop->sem_num;
298 sem_op = sop->sem_op;
299 result = curr->semval;
300
301 if (!sem_op && result)
302 goto would_block;
303
304 result += sem_op;
305 if (result < 0)
306 goto would_block;
307 if (result > SEMVMX)
308 goto out_of_range;
309 if (sop->sem_flg & SEM_UNDO) {
310 int undo = un->semadj[sop->sem_num] - sem_op;
311 /*
312 * Exceeding the undo range is an error.
313 */
314 if (undo < (-SEMAEM - 1) || undo > SEMAEM)
315 goto out_of_range;
316 }
317 curr->semval = result;
318 }
319
320 sop--;
321 while (sop >= sops) {
322 sma->sem_base[sop->sem_num].sempid = pid;
323 if (sop->sem_flg & SEM_UNDO)
324 un->semadj[sop->sem_num] -= sop->sem_op;
325 sop--;
326 }
327
328 sma->sem_otime = get_seconds();
329 return 0;
330
331out_of_range:
332 result = -ERANGE;
333 goto undo;
334
335would_block:
336 if (sop->sem_flg & IPC_NOWAIT)
337 result = -EAGAIN;
338 else
339 result = 1;
340
341undo:
342 sop--;
343 while (sop >= sops) {
344 sma->sem_base[sop->sem_num].semval -= sop->sem_op;
345 sop--;
346 }
347
348 return result;
349}
350
351/* Go through the pending queue for the indicated semaphore
352 * looking for tasks that can be completed.
353 */
354static void update_queue (struct sem_array * sma)
355{
356 int error;
357 struct sem_queue * q;
358
359 q = sma->sem_pending;
360 while(q) {
361 error = try_atomic_semop(sma, q->sops, q->nsops,
362 q->undo, q->pid);
363
364 /* Does q->sleeper still need to sleep? */
365 if (error <= 0) {
366 struct sem_queue *n;
367 remove_from_queue(sma,q);
368 q->status = IN_WAKEUP;
369 /*
370 * Continue scanning. The next operation
371 * that must be checked depends on the type of the
372 * completed operation:
373 * - if the operation modified the array, then
374 * restart from the head of the queue and
375 * check for threads that might be waiting
376 * for semaphore values to become 0.
377 * - if the operation didn't modify the array,
378 * then just continue.
379 */
380 if (q->alter)
381 n = sma->sem_pending;
382 else
383 n = q->next;
384 wake_up_process(q->sleeper);
385 /* hands-off: q will disappear immediately after
386 * writing q->status.
387 */
Linus Torvalds1224b372005-12-24 12:19:38 -0800388 smp_wmb();
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700389 q->status = error;
390 q = n;
391 } else {
392 q = q->next;
393 }
394 }
395}
396
397/* The following counts are associated to each semaphore:
398 * semncnt number of tasks waiting on semval being nonzero
399 * semzcnt number of tasks waiting on semval being zero
400 * This model assumes that a task waits on exactly one semaphore.
401 * Since semaphore operations are to be performed atomically, tasks actually
402 * wait on a whole sequence of semaphores simultaneously.
403 * The counts we return here are a rough approximation, but still
404 * warrant that semncnt+semzcnt>0 if the task is on the pending queue.
405 */
406static int count_semncnt (struct sem_array * sma, ushort semnum)
407{
408 int semncnt;
409 struct sem_queue * q;
410
411 semncnt = 0;
412 for (q = sma->sem_pending; q; q = q->next) {
413 struct sembuf * sops = q->sops;
414 int nsops = q->nsops;
415 int i;
416 for (i = 0; i < nsops; i++)
417 if (sops[i].sem_num == semnum
418 && (sops[i].sem_op < 0)
419 && !(sops[i].sem_flg & IPC_NOWAIT))
420 semncnt++;
421 }
422 return semncnt;
423}
424static int count_semzcnt (struct sem_array * sma, ushort semnum)
425{
426 int semzcnt;
427 struct sem_queue * q;
428
429 semzcnt = 0;
430 for (q = sma->sem_pending; q; q = q->next) {
431 struct sembuf * sops = q->sops;
432 int nsops = q->nsops;
433 int i;
434 for (i = 0; i < nsops; i++)
435 if (sops[i].sem_num == semnum
436 && (sops[i].sem_op == 0)
437 && !(sops[i].sem_flg & IPC_NOWAIT))
438 semzcnt++;
439 }
440 return semzcnt;
441}
442
Ingo Molnar5f921ae2006-03-26 01:37:17 -0800443/* Free a semaphore set. freeary() is called with sem_ids.mutex locked and
444 * the spinlock for this semaphore set hold. sem_ids.mutex remains locked
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700445 * on exit.
446 */
447static void freeary (struct sem_array *sma, int id)
448{
449 struct sem_undo *un;
450 struct sem_queue *q;
451 int size;
452
453 /* Invalidate the existing undo structures for this semaphore set.
454 * (They will be freed without any further action in exit_sem()
455 * or during the next semop.)
456 */
457 for (un = sma->undo; un; un = un->id_next)
458 un->semid = -1;
459
460 /* Wake up all pending processes and let them fail with EIDRM. */
461 q = sma->sem_pending;
462 while(q) {
463 struct sem_queue *n;
464 /* lazy remove_from_queue: we are killing the whole queue */
465 q->prev = NULL;
466 n = q->next;
467 q->status = IN_WAKEUP;
468 wake_up_process(q->sleeper); /* doesn't sleep */
Manfred Spraul6003a932005-12-23 23:57:41 +0100469 smp_wmb();
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700470 q->status = -EIDRM; /* hands-off q */
471 q = n;
472 }
473
474 /* Remove the semaphore set from the ID array*/
475 sma = sem_rmid(id);
476 sem_unlock(sma);
477
478 used_sems -= sma->sem_nsems;
479 size = sizeof (*sma) + sma->sem_nsems * sizeof (struct sem);
480 security_sem_free(sma);
481 ipc_rcu_putref(sma);
482}
483
484static unsigned long copy_semid_to_user(void __user *buf, struct semid64_ds *in, int version)
485{
486 switch(version) {
487 case IPC_64:
488 return copy_to_user(buf, in, sizeof(*in));
489 case IPC_OLD:
490 {
491 struct semid_ds out;
492
493 ipc64_perm_to_ipc_perm(&in->sem_perm, &out.sem_perm);
494
495 out.sem_otime = in->sem_otime;
496 out.sem_ctime = in->sem_ctime;
497 out.sem_nsems = in->sem_nsems;
498
499 return copy_to_user(buf, &out, sizeof(out));
500 }
501 default:
502 return -EINVAL;
503 }
504}
505
506static int semctl_nolock(int semid, int semnum, int cmd, int version, union semun arg)
507{
508 int err = -EINVAL;
509 struct sem_array *sma;
510
511 switch(cmd) {
512 case IPC_INFO:
513 case SEM_INFO:
514 {
515 struct seminfo seminfo;
516 int max_id;
517
518 err = security_sem_semctl(NULL, cmd);
519 if (err)
520 return err;
521
522 memset(&seminfo,0,sizeof(seminfo));
523 seminfo.semmni = sc_semmni;
524 seminfo.semmns = sc_semmns;
525 seminfo.semmsl = sc_semmsl;
526 seminfo.semopm = sc_semopm;
527 seminfo.semvmx = SEMVMX;
528 seminfo.semmnu = SEMMNU;
529 seminfo.semmap = SEMMAP;
530 seminfo.semume = SEMUME;
Ingo Molnar5f921ae2006-03-26 01:37:17 -0800531 mutex_lock(&sem_ids.mutex);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700532 if (cmd == SEM_INFO) {
533 seminfo.semusz = sem_ids.in_use;
534 seminfo.semaem = used_sems;
535 } else {
536 seminfo.semusz = SEMUSZ;
537 seminfo.semaem = SEMAEM;
538 }
539 max_id = sem_ids.max_id;
Ingo Molnar5f921ae2006-03-26 01:37:17 -0800540 mutex_unlock(&sem_ids.mutex);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700541 if (copy_to_user (arg.__buf, &seminfo, sizeof(struct seminfo)))
542 return -EFAULT;
543 return (max_id < 0) ? 0: max_id;
544 }
545 case SEM_STAT:
546 {
547 struct semid64_ds tbuf;
548 int id;
549
550 if(semid >= sem_ids.entries->size)
551 return -EINVAL;
552
553 memset(&tbuf,0,sizeof(tbuf));
554
555 sma = sem_lock(semid);
556 if(sma == NULL)
557 return -EINVAL;
558
559 err = -EACCES;
560 if (ipcperms (&sma->sem_perm, S_IRUGO))
561 goto out_unlock;
562
563 err = security_sem_semctl(sma, cmd);
564 if (err)
565 goto out_unlock;
566
567 id = sem_buildid(semid, sma->sem_perm.seq);
568
569 kernel_to_ipc64_perm(&sma->sem_perm, &tbuf.sem_perm);
570 tbuf.sem_otime = sma->sem_otime;
571 tbuf.sem_ctime = sma->sem_ctime;
572 tbuf.sem_nsems = sma->sem_nsems;
573 sem_unlock(sma);
574 if (copy_semid_to_user (arg.buf, &tbuf, version))
575 return -EFAULT;
576 return id;
577 }
578 default:
579 return -EINVAL;
580 }
581 return err;
582out_unlock:
583 sem_unlock(sma);
584 return err;
585}
586
587static int semctl_main(int semid, int semnum, int cmd, int version, union semun arg)
588{
589 struct sem_array *sma;
590 struct sem* curr;
591 int err;
592 ushort fast_sem_io[SEMMSL_FAST];
593 ushort* sem_io = fast_sem_io;
594 int nsems;
595
596 sma = sem_lock(semid);
597 if(sma==NULL)
598 return -EINVAL;
599
600 nsems = sma->sem_nsems;
601
602 err=-EIDRM;
603 if (sem_checkid(sma,semid))
604 goto out_unlock;
605
606 err = -EACCES;
607 if (ipcperms (&sma->sem_perm, (cmd==SETVAL||cmd==SETALL)?S_IWUGO:S_IRUGO))
608 goto out_unlock;
609
610 err = security_sem_semctl(sma, cmd);
611 if (err)
612 goto out_unlock;
613
614 err = -EACCES;
615 switch (cmd) {
616 case GETALL:
617 {
618 ushort __user *array = arg.array;
619 int i;
620
621 if(nsems > SEMMSL_FAST) {
622 ipc_rcu_getref(sma);
623 sem_unlock(sma);
624
625 sem_io = ipc_alloc(sizeof(ushort)*nsems);
626 if(sem_io == NULL) {
627 ipc_lock_by_ptr(&sma->sem_perm);
628 ipc_rcu_putref(sma);
629 sem_unlock(sma);
630 return -ENOMEM;
631 }
632
633 ipc_lock_by_ptr(&sma->sem_perm);
634 ipc_rcu_putref(sma);
635 if (sma->sem_perm.deleted) {
636 sem_unlock(sma);
637 err = -EIDRM;
638 goto out_free;
639 }
640 }
641
642 for (i = 0; i < sma->sem_nsems; i++)
643 sem_io[i] = sma->sem_base[i].semval;
644 sem_unlock(sma);
645 err = 0;
646 if(copy_to_user(array, sem_io, nsems*sizeof(ushort)))
647 err = -EFAULT;
648 goto out_free;
649 }
650 case SETALL:
651 {
652 int i;
653 struct sem_undo *un;
654
655 ipc_rcu_getref(sma);
656 sem_unlock(sma);
657
658 if(nsems > SEMMSL_FAST) {
659 sem_io = ipc_alloc(sizeof(ushort)*nsems);
660 if(sem_io == NULL) {
661 ipc_lock_by_ptr(&sma->sem_perm);
662 ipc_rcu_putref(sma);
663 sem_unlock(sma);
664 return -ENOMEM;
665 }
666 }
667
668 if (copy_from_user (sem_io, arg.array, nsems*sizeof(ushort))) {
669 ipc_lock_by_ptr(&sma->sem_perm);
670 ipc_rcu_putref(sma);
671 sem_unlock(sma);
672 err = -EFAULT;
673 goto out_free;
674 }
675
676 for (i = 0; i < nsems; i++) {
677 if (sem_io[i] > SEMVMX) {
678 ipc_lock_by_ptr(&sma->sem_perm);
679 ipc_rcu_putref(sma);
680 sem_unlock(sma);
681 err = -ERANGE;
682 goto out_free;
683 }
684 }
685 ipc_lock_by_ptr(&sma->sem_perm);
686 ipc_rcu_putref(sma);
687 if (sma->sem_perm.deleted) {
688 sem_unlock(sma);
689 err = -EIDRM;
690 goto out_free;
691 }
692
693 for (i = 0; i < nsems; i++)
694 sma->sem_base[i].semval = sem_io[i];
695 for (un = sma->undo; un; un = un->id_next)
696 for (i = 0; i < nsems; i++)
697 un->semadj[i] = 0;
698 sma->sem_ctime = get_seconds();
699 /* maybe some queued-up processes were waiting for this */
700 update_queue(sma);
701 err = 0;
702 goto out_unlock;
703 }
704 case IPC_STAT:
705 {
706 struct semid64_ds tbuf;
707 memset(&tbuf,0,sizeof(tbuf));
708 kernel_to_ipc64_perm(&sma->sem_perm, &tbuf.sem_perm);
709 tbuf.sem_otime = sma->sem_otime;
710 tbuf.sem_ctime = sma->sem_ctime;
711 tbuf.sem_nsems = sma->sem_nsems;
712 sem_unlock(sma);
713 if (copy_semid_to_user (arg.buf, &tbuf, version))
714 return -EFAULT;
715 return 0;
716 }
717 /* GETVAL, GETPID, GETNCTN, GETZCNT, SETVAL: fall-through */
718 }
719 err = -EINVAL;
720 if(semnum < 0 || semnum >= nsems)
721 goto out_unlock;
722
723 curr = &sma->sem_base[semnum];
724
725 switch (cmd) {
726 case GETVAL:
727 err = curr->semval;
728 goto out_unlock;
729 case GETPID:
730 err = curr->sempid;
731 goto out_unlock;
732 case GETNCNT:
733 err = count_semncnt(sma,semnum);
734 goto out_unlock;
735 case GETZCNT:
736 err = count_semzcnt(sma,semnum);
737 goto out_unlock;
738 case SETVAL:
739 {
740 int val = arg.val;
741 struct sem_undo *un;
742 err = -ERANGE;
743 if (val > SEMVMX || val < 0)
744 goto out_unlock;
745
746 for (un = sma->undo; un; un = un->id_next)
747 un->semadj[semnum] = 0;
748 curr->semval = val;
749 curr->sempid = current->tgid;
750 sma->sem_ctime = get_seconds();
751 /* maybe some queued-up processes were waiting for this */
752 update_queue(sma);
753 err = 0;
754 goto out_unlock;
755 }
756 }
757out_unlock:
758 sem_unlock(sma);
759out_free:
760 if(sem_io != fast_sem_io)
761 ipc_free(sem_io, sizeof(ushort)*nsems);
762 return err;
763}
764
765struct sem_setbuf {
766 uid_t uid;
767 gid_t gid;
768 mode_t mode;
769};
770
771static inline unsigned long copy_semid_from_user(struct sem_setbuf *out, void __user *buf, int version)
772{
773 switch(version) {
774 case IPC_64:
775 {
776 struct semid64_ds tbuf;
777
778 if(copy_from_user(&tbuf, buf, sizeof(tbuf)))
779 return -EFAULT;
780
781 out->uid = tbuf.sem_perm.uid;
782 out->gid = tbuf.sem_perm.gid;
783 out->mode = tbuf.sem_perm.mode;
784
785 return 0;
786 }
787 case IPC_OLD:
788 {
789 struct semid_ds tbuf_old;
790
791 if(copy_from_user(&tbuf_old, buf, sizeof(tbuf_old)))
792 return -EFAULT;
793
794 out->uid = tbuf_old.sem_perm.uid;
795 out->gid = tbuf_old.sem_perm.gid;
796 out->mode = tbuf_old.sem_perm.mode;
797
798 return 0;
799 }
800 default:
801 return -EINVAL;
802 }
803}
804
805static int semctl_down(int semid, int semnum, int cmd, int version, union semun arg)
806{
807 struct sem_array *sma;
808 int err;
809 struct sem_setbuf setbuf;
810 struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcp;
811
812 if(cmd == IPC_SET) {
813 if(copy_semid_from_user (&setbuf, arg.buf, version))
814 return -EFAULT;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700815 }
816 sma = sem_lock(semid);
817 if(sma==NULL)
818 return -EINVAL;
819
820 if (sem_checkid(sma,semid)) {
821 err=-EIDRM;
822 goto out_unlock;
823 }
824 ipcp = &sma->sem_perm;
Steve Grubb073115d2006-04-02 17:07:33 -0400825
826 err = audit_ipc_obj(ipcp);
827 if (err)
828 goto out_unlock;
829
Linda Knippersac032212006-05-16 22:03:48 -0400830 if (cmd == IPC_SET) {
831 err = audit_ipc_set_perm(0, setbuf.uid, setbuf.gid, setbuf.mode);
832 if (err)
833 goto out_unlock;
834 }
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700835 if (current->euid != ipcp->cuid &&
836 current->euid != ipcp->uid && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) {
837 err=-EPERM;
838 goto out_unlock;
839 }
840
841 err = security_sem_semctl(sma, cmd);
842 if (err)
843 goto out_unlock;
844
845 switch(cmd){
846 case IPC_RMID:
847 freeary(sma, semid);
848 err = 0;
849 break;
850 case IPC_SET:
851 ipcp->uid = setbuf.uid;
852 ipcp->gid = setbuf.gid;
853 ipcp->mode = (ipcp->mode & ~S_IRWXUGO)
854 | (setbuf.mode & S_IRWXUGO);
855 sma->sem_ctime = get_seconds();
856 sem_unlock(sma);
857 err = 0;
858 break;
859 default:
860 sem_unlock(sma);
861 err = -EINVAL;
862 break;
863 }
864 return err;
865
866out_unlock:
867 sem_unlock(sma);
868 return err;
869}
870
871asmlinkage long sys_semctl (int semid, int semnum, int cmd, union semun arg)
872{
873 int err = -EINVAL;
874 int version;
875
876 if (semid < 0)
877 return -EINVAL;
878
879 version = ipc_parse_version(&cmd);
880
881 switch(cmd) {
882 case IPC_INFO:
883 case SEM_INFO:
884 case SEM_STAT:
885 err = semctl_nolock(semid,semnum,cmd,version,arg);
886 return err;
887 case GETALL:
888 case GETVAL:
889 case GETPID:
890 case GETNCNT:
891 case GETZCNT:
892 case IPC_STAT:
893 case SETVAL:
894 case SETALL:
895 err = semctl_main(semid,semnum,cmd,version,arg);
896 return err;
897 case IPC_RMID:
898 case IPC_SET:
Ingo Molnar5f921ae2006-03-26 01:37:17 -0800899 mutex_lock(&sem_ids.mutex);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700900 err = semctl_down(semid,semnum,cmd,version,arg);
Ingo Molnar5f921ae2006-03-26 01:37:17 -0800901 mutex_unlock(&sem_ids.mutex);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700902 return err;
903 default:
904 return -EINVAL;
905 }
906}
907
908static inline void lock_semundo(void)
909{
910 struct sem_undo_list *undo_list;
911
912 undo_list = current->sysvsem.undo_list;
Ingo Molnar00a5dfd2005-08-05 23:05:27 +0200913 if (undo_list)
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700914 spin_lock(&undo_list->lock);
915}
916
917/* This code has an interaction with copy_semundo().
918 * Consider; two tasks are sharing the undo_list. task1
919 * acquires the undo_list lock in lock_semundo(). If task2 now
920 * exits before task1 releases the lock (by calling
921 * unlock_semundo()), then task1 will never call spin_unlock().
922 * This leave the sem_undo_list in a locked state. If task1 now creats task3
923 * and once again shares the sem_undo_list, the sem_undo_list will still be
924 * locked, and future SEM_UNDO operations will deadlock. This case is
925 * dealt with in copy_semundo() by having it reinitialize the spin lock when
926 * the refcnt goes from 1 to 2.
927 */
928static inline void unlock_semundo(void)
929{
930 struct sem_undo_list *undo_list;
931
932 undo_list = current->sysvsem.undo_list;
Ingo Molnar00a5dfd2005-08-05 23:05:27 +0200933 if (undo_list)
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700934 spin_unlock(&undo_list->lock);
935}
936
937
938/* If the task doesn't already have a undo_list, then allocate one
939 * here. We guarantee there is only one thread using this undo list,
940 * and current is THE ONE
941 *
942 * If this allocation and assignment succeeds, but later
943 * portions of this code fail, there is no need to free the sem_undo_list.
944 * Just let it stay associated with the task, and it'll be freed later
945 * at exit time.
946 *
947 * This can block, so callers must hold no locks.
948 */
949static inline int get_undo_list(struct sem_undo_list **undo_listp)
950{
951 struct sem_undo_list *undo_list;
952 int size;
953
954 undo_list = current->sysvsem.undo_list;
955 if (!undo_list) {
956 size = sizeof(struct sem_undo_list);
957 undo_list = (struct sem_undo_list *) kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
958 if (undo_list == NULL)
959 return -ENOMEM;
960 memset(undo_list, 0, size);
Ingo Molnar00a5dfd2005-08-05 23:05:27 +0200961 spin_lock_init(&undo_list->lock);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700962 atomic_set(&undo_list->refcnt, 1);
963 current->sysvsem.undo_list = undo_list;
964 }
965 *undo_listp = undo_list;
966 return 0;
967}
968
969static struct sem_undo *lookup_undo(struct sem_undo_list *ulp, int semid)
970{
971 struct sem_undo **last, *un;
972
973 last = &ulp->proc_list;
974 un = *last;
975 while(un != NULL) {
976 if(un->semid==semid)
977 break;
978 if(un->semid==-1) {
979 *last=un->proc_next;
980 kfree(un);
981 } else {
982 last=&un->proc_next;
983 }
984 un=*last;
985 }
986 return un;
987}
988
989static struct sem_undo *find_undo(int semid)
990{
991 struct sem_array *sma;
992 struct sem_undo_list *ulp;
993 struct sem_undo *un, *new;
994 int nsems;
995 int error;
996
997 error = get_undo_list(&ulp);
998 if (error)
999 return ERR_PTR(error);
1000
1001 lock_semundo();
1002 un = lookup_undo(ulp, semid);
1003 unlock_semundo();
1004 if (likely(un!=NULL))
1005 goto out;
1006
1007 /* no undo structure around - allocate one. */
1008 sma = sem_lock(semid);
1009 un = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
1010 if(sma==NULL)
1011 goto out;
1012 un = ERR_PTR(-EIDRM);
1013 if (sem_checkid(sma,semid)) {
1014 sem_unlock(sma);
1015 goto out;
1016 }
1017 nsems = sma->sem_nsems;
1018 ipc_rcu_getref(sma);
1019 sem_unlock(sma);
1020
1021 new = (struct sem_undo *) kmalloc(sizeof(struct sem_undo) + sizeof(short)*nsems, GFP_KERNEL);
1022 if (!new) {
1023 ipc_lock_by_ptr(&sma->sem_perm);
1024 ipc_rcu_putref(sma);
1025 sem_unlock(sma);
1026 return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
1027 }
1028 memset(new, 0, sizeof(struct sem_undo) + sizeof(short)*nsems);
1029 new->semadj = (short *) &new[1];
1030 new->semid = semid;
1031
1032 lock_semundo();
1033 un = lookup_undo(ulp, semid);
1034 if (un) {
1035 unlock_semundo();
1036 kfree(new);
1037 ipc_lock_by_ptr(&sma->sem_perm);
1038 ipc_rcu_putref(sma);
1039 sem_unlock(sma);
1040 goto out;
1041 }
1042 ipc_lock_by_ptr(&sma->sem_perm);
1043 ipc_rcu_putref(sma);
1044 if (sma->sem_perm.deleted) {
1045 sem_unlock(sma);
1046 unlock_semundo();
1047 kfree(new);
1048 un = ERR_PTR(-EIDRM);
1049 goto out;
1050 }
1051 new->proc_next = ulp->proc_list;
1052 ulp->proc_list = new;
1053 new->id_next = sma->undo;
1054 sma->undo = new;
1055 sem_unlock(sma);
1056 un = new;
1057 unlock_semundo();
1058out:
1059 return un;
1060}
1061
1062asmlinkage long sys_semtimedop(int semid, struct sembuf __user *tsops,
1063 unsigned nsops, const struct timespec __user *timeout)
1064{
1065 int error = -EINVAL;
1066 struct sem_array *sma;
1067 struct sembuf fast_sops[SEMOPM_FAST];
1068 struct sembuf* sops = fast_sops, *sop;
1069 struct sem_undo *un;
Manfred Spraulb78755a2005-06-23 00:10:06 -07001070 int undos = 0, alter = 0, max;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001071 struct sem_queue queue;
1072 unsigned long jiffies_left = 0;
1073
1074 if (nsops < 1 || semid < 0)
1075 return -EINVAL;
1076 if (nsops > sc_semopm)
1077 return -E2BIG;
1078 if(nsops > SEMOPM_FAST) {
1079 sops = kmalloc(sizeof(*sops)*nsops,GFP_KERNEL);
1080 if(sops==NULL)
1081 return -ENOMEM;
1082 }
1083 if (copy_from_user (sops, tsops, nsops * sizeof(*tsops))) {
1084 error=-EFAULT;
1085 goto out_free;
1086 }
1087 if (timeout) {
1088 struct timespec _timeout;
1089 if (copy_from_user(&_timeout, timeout, sizeof(*timeout))) {
1090 error = -EFAULT;
1091 goto out_free;
1092 }
1093 if (_timeout.tv_sec < 0 || _timeout.tv_nsec < 0 ||
1094 _timeout.tv_nsec >= 1000000000L) {
1095 error = -EINVAL;
1096 goto out_free;
1097 }
1098 jiffies_left = timespec_to_jiffies(&_timeout);
1099 }
1100 max = 0;
1101 for (sop = sops; sop < sops + nsops; sop++) {
1102 if (sop->sem_num >= max)
1103 max = sop->sem_num;
1104 if (sop->sem_flg & SEM_UNDO)
Manfred Spraulb78755a2005-06-23 00:10:06 -07001105 undos = 1;
1106 if (sop->sem_op != 0)
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001107 alter = 1;
1108 }
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001109
1110retry_undos:
1111 if (undos) {
1112 un = find_undo(semid);
1113 if (IS_ERR(un)) {
1114 error = PTR_ERR(un);
1115 goto out_free;
1116 }
1117 } else
1118 un = NULL;
1119
1120 sma = sem_lock(semid);
1121 error=-EINVAL;
1122 if(sma==NULL)
1123 goto out_free;
1124 error = -EIDRM;
1125 if (sem_checkid(sma,semid))
1126 goto out_unlock_free;
1127 /*
1128 * semid identifies are not unique - find_undo may have
1129 * allocated an undo structure, it was invalidated by an RMID
1130 * and now a new array with received the same id. Check and retry.
1131 */
1132 if (un && un->semid == -1) {
1133 sem_unlock(sma);
1134 goto retry_undos;
1135 }
1136 error = -EFBIG;
1137 if (max >= sma->sem_nsems)
1138 goto out_unlock_free;
1139
1140 error = -EACCES;
1141 if (ipcperms(&sma->sem_perm, alter ? S_IWUGO : S_IRUGO))
1142 goto out_unlock_free;
1143
1144 error = security_sem_semop(sma, sops, nsops, alter);
1145 if (error)
1146 goto out_unlock_free;
1147
1148 error = try_atomic_semop (sma, sops, nsops, un, current->tgid);
1149 if (error <= 0) {
1150 if (alter && error == 0)
1151 update_queue (sma);
1152 goto out_unlock_free;
1153 }
1154
1155 /* We need to sleep on this operation, so we put the current
1156 * task into the pending queue and go to sleep.
1157 */
1158
1159 queue.sma = sma;
1160 queue.sops = sops;
1161 queue.nsops = nsops;
1162 queue.undo = un;
1163 queue.pid = current->tgid;
1164 queue.id = semid;
1165 queue.alter = alter;
1166 if (alter)
1167 append_to_queue(sma ,&queue);
1168 else
1169 prepend_to_queue(sma ,&queue);
1170
1171 queue.status = -EINTR;
1172 queue.sleeper = current;
1173 current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
1174 sem_unlock(sma);
1175
1176 if (timeout)
1177 jiffies_left = schedule_timeout(jiffies_left);
1178 else
1179 schedule();
1180
1181 error = queue.status;
1182 while(unlikely(error == IN_WAKEUP)) {
1183 cpu_relax();
1184 error = queue.status;
1185 }
1186
1187 if (error != -EINTR) {
1188 /* fast path: update_queue already obtained all requested
1189 * resources */
1190 goto out_free;
1191 }
1192
1193 sma = sem_lock(semid);
1194 if(sma==NULL) {
Eric Sesterhenn27315c92006-03-26 18:28:38 +02001195 BUG_ON(queue.prev != NULL);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001196 error = -EIDRM;
1197 goto out_free;
1198 }
1199
1200 /*
1201 * If queue.status != -EINTR we are woken up by another process
1202 */
1203 error = queue.status;
1204 if (error != -EINTR) {
1205 goto out_unlock_free;
1206 }
1207
1208 /*
1209 * If an interrupt occurred we have to clean up the queue
1210 */
1211 if (timeout && jiffies_left == 0)
1212 error = -EAGAIN;
1213 remove_from_queue(sma,&queue);
1214 goto out_unlock_free;
1215
1216out_unlock_free:
1217 sem_unlock(sma);
1218out_free:
1219 if(sops != fast_sops)
1220 kfree(sops);
1221 return error;
1222}
1223
1224asmlinkage long sys_semop (int semid, struct sembuf __user *tsops, unsigned nsops)
1225{
1226 return sys_semtimedop(semid, tsops, nsops, NULL);
1227}
1228
1229/* If CLONE_SYSVSEM is set, establish sharing of SEM_UNDO state between
1230 * parent and child tasks.
1231 *
1232 * See the notes above unlock_semundo() regarding the spin_lock_init()
1233 * in this code. Initialize the undo_list->lock here instead of get_undo_list()
1234 * because of the reasoning in the comment above unlock_semundo.
1235 */
1236
1237int copy_semundo(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *tsk)
1238{
1239 struct sem_undo_list *undo_list;
1240 int error;
1241
1242 if (clone_flags & CLONE_SYSVSEM) {
1243 error = get_undo_list(&undo_list);
1244 if (error)
1245 return error;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001246 atomic_inc(&undo_list->refcnt);
1247 tsk->sysvsem.undo_list = undo_list;
1248 } else
1249 tsk->sysvsem.undo_list = NULL;
1250
1251 return 0;
1252}
1253
1254/*
1255 * add semadj values to semaphores, free undo structures.
1256 * undo structures are not freed when semaphore arrays are destroyed
1257 * so some of them may be out of date.
1258 * IMPLEMENTATION NOTE: There is some confusion over whether the
1259 * set of adjustments that needs to be done should be done in an atomic
1260 * manner or not. That is, if we are attempting to decrement the semval
1261 * should we queue up and wait until we can do so legally?
1262 * The original implementation attempted to do this (queue and wait).
1263 * The current implementation does not do so. The POSIX standard
1264 * and SVID should be consulted to determine what behavior is mandated.
1265 */
1266void exit_sem(struct task_struct *tsk)
1267{
1268 struct sem_undo_list *undo_list;
1269 struct sem_undo *u, **up;
1270
1271 undo_list = tsk->sysvsem.undo_list;
1272 if (!undo_list)
1273 return;
1274
1275 if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&undo_list->refcnt))
1276 return;
1277
1278 /* There's no need to hold the semundo list lock, as current
1279 * is the last task exiting for this undo list.
1280 */
1281 for (up = &undo_list->proc_list; (u = *up); *up = u->proc_next, kfree(u)) {
1282 struct sem_array *sma;
1283 int nsems, i;
1284 struct sem_undo *un, **unp;
1285 int semid;
1286
1287 semid = u->semid;
1288
1289 if(semid == -1)
1290 continue;
1291 sma = sem_lock(semid);
1292 if (sma == NULL)
1293 continue;
1294
1295 if (u->semid == -1)
1296 goto next_entry;
1297
1298 BUG_ON(sem_checkid(sma,u->semid));
1299
1300 /* remove u from the sma->undo list */
1301 for (unp = &sma->undo; (un = *unp); unp = &un->id_next) {
1302 if (u == un)
1303 goto found;
1304 }
1305 printk ("exit_sem undo list error id=%d\n", u->semid);
1306 goto next_entry;
1307found:
1308 *unp = un->id_next;
1309 /* perform adjustments registered in u */
1310 nsems = sma->sem_nsems;
1311 for (i = 0; i < nsems; i++) {
Ingo Molnar5f921ae2006-03-26 01:37:17 -08001312 struct sem * semaphore = &sma->sem_base[i];
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001313 if (u->semadj[i]) {
Ingo Molnar5f921ae2006-03-26 01:37:17 -08001314 semaphore->semval += u->semadj[i];
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001315 /*
1316 * Range checks of the new semaphore value,
1317 * not defined by sus:
1318 * - Some unices ignore the undo entirely
1319 * (e.g. HP UX 11i 11.22, Tru64 V5.1)
1320 * - some cap the value (e.g. FreeBSD caps
1321 * at 0, but doesn't enforce SEMVMX)
1322 *
1323 * Linux caps the semaphore value, both at 0
1324 * and at SEMVMX.
1325 *
1326 * Manfred <manfred@colorfullife.com>
1327 */
Ingo Molnar5f921ae2006-03-26 01:37:17 -08001328 if (semaphore->semval < 0)
1329 semaphore->semval = 0;
1330 if (semaphore->semval > SEMVMX)
1331 semaphore->semval = SEMVMX;
1332 semaphore->sempid = current->tgid;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001333 }
1334 }
1335 sma->sem_otime = get_seconds();
1336 /* maybe some queued-up processes were waiting for this */
1337 update_queue(sma);
1338next_entry:
1339 sem_unlock(sma);
1340 }
1341 kfree(undo_list);
1342}
1343
1344#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
Mike Waychison19b49462005-09-06 15:17:10 -07001345static int sysvipc_sem_proc_show(struct seq_file *s, void *it)
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001346{
Mike Waychison19b49462005-09-06 15:17:10 -07001347 struct sem_array *sma = it;
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001348
Mike Waychison19b49462005-09-06 15:17:10 -07001349 return seq_printf(s,
1350 "%10d %10d %4o %10lu %5u %5u %5u %5u %10lu %10lu\n",
1351 sma->sem_perm.key,
1352 sma->sem_id,
1353 sma->sem_perm.mode,
1354 sma->sem_nsems,
1355 sma->sem_perm.uid,
1356 sma->sem_perm.gid,
1357 sma->sem_perm.cuid,
1358 sma->sem_perm.cgid,
1359 sma->sem_otime,
1360 sma->sem_ctime);
Linus Torvalds1da177e2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07001361}
1362#endif