blob: a3fdd8f7c9c6c92a80111367225cacfc3448f35d [file] [log] [blame]
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +00001
2/*--------------------------------------------------------------------*/
njn1d0825f2006-03-27 11:37:07 +00003/*--- The leak checker. mc_leakcheck.c ---*/
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +00004/*--------------------------------------------------------------------*/
5
6/*
nethercote137bc552003-11-14 17:47:54 +00007 This file is part of MemCheck, a heavyweight Valgrind tool for
njn1d0825f2006-03-27 11:37:07 +00008 detecting memory errors.
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +00009
njn9f207462009-03-10 22:02:09 +000010 Copyright (C) 2000-2009 Julian Seward
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +000011 jseward@acm.org
12
13 This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
14 modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
15 published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the
16 License, or (at your option) any later version.
17
18 This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but
19 WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
20 MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
21 General Public License for more details.
22
23 You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
24 along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
25 Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA
26 02111-1307, USA.
27
28 The GNU General Public License is contained in the file COPYING.
29*/
30
njnc7561b92005-06-19 01:24:32 +000031#include "pub_tool_basics.h"
sewardj4cfea4f2006-10-14 19:26:10 +000032#include "pub_tool_vki.h"
njn4802b382005-06-11 04:58:29 +000033#include "pub_tool_aspacemgr.h"
njn1d0825f2006-03-27 11:37:07 +000034#include "pub_tool_execontext.h"
35#include "pub_tool_hashtable.h"
njn97405b22005-06-02 03:39:33 +000036#include "pub_tool_libcbase.h"
njn132bfcc2005-06-04 19:16:06 +000037#include "pub_tool_libcassert.h"
njn36a20fa2005-06-03 03:08:39 +000038#include "pub_tool_libcprint.h"
njnde62cbf2005-06-10 22:08:14 +000039#include "pub_tool_libcsignal.h"
njn6ace3ea2005-06-17 03:06:27 +000040#include "pub_tool_machine.h"
njnc7561b92005-06-19 01:24:32 +000041#include "pub_tool_mallocfree.h"
42#include "pub_tool_options.h"
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +000043#include "pub_tool_oset.h"
njn73c51342005-06-18 15:18:15 +000044#include "pub_tool_signals.h"
njn1d0825f2006-03-27 11:37:07 +000045#include "pub_tool_tooliface.h" // Needed for mc_include.h
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +000046
njn1d0825f2006-03-27 11:37:07 +000047#include "mc_include.h"
njnc7561b92005-06-19 01:24:32 +000048
49#include <setjmp.h> // For jmp_buf
50
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +000051/*------------------------------------------------------------*/
52/*--- An overview of leak checking. ---*/
53/*------------------------------------------------------------*/
njnc7561b92005-06-19 01:24:32 +000054
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +000055// Leak-checking is a directed-graph traversal problem. The graph has
56// two kinds of nodes:
57// - root-set nodes:
58// - GP registers of all threads;
59// - valid, aligned, pointer-sized data words in valid client memory,
60// including stacks, but excluding words within client heap-allocated
61// blocks (they are excluded so that later on we can differentiate
62// between heap blocks that are indirectly leaked vs. directly leaked).
63// - heap-allocated blocks. A block is a mempool chunk or a malloc chunk
64// that doesn't contain a mempool chunk. Nb: the terms "blocks" and
65// "chunks" are used interchangeably below.
66//
67// There are two kinds of edges:
68// - start-pointers, i.e. pointers to the start of a block;
69// - interior-pointers, i.e. pointers to the interior of a block.
70//
71// We use "pointers" rather than "edges" below.
72//
73// Root set nodes only point to blocks. Blocks only point to blocks;
74// a block can point to itself.
75//
76// The aim is to traverse the graph and determine the status of each block.
77//
78// There are 9 distinct cases. See memcheck/docs/mc-manual.xml for details.
79// Presenting all nine categories to the user is probably too much.
80// Currently we do this:
81// - definitely lost: case 3
82// - indirectly lost: case 4, 9
83// - possibly lost: cases 5..8
84// - still reachable: cases 1, 2
85//
86// It's far from clear that this is the best possible categorisation; it's
87// accreted over time without any central guiding principle.
88
89/*------------------------------------------------------------*/
90/*--- XXX: Thoughts for improvement. ---*/
91/*------------------------------------------------------------*/
92
93// From the user's point of view:
94// - If they aren't using interior-pointers, they just have to fix the
95// directly lost blocks, and the indirectly lost ones will be fixed as
96// part of that. Any possibly lost blocks will just be due to random
97// pointer garbage and can be ignored.
98//
99// - If they are using interior-pointers, the fact that they currently are not
100// being told which ones might be directly lost vs. indirectly lost makes
101// it hard to know where to begin.
102//
103// All this makes me wonder if new option is warranted:
104// --follow-interior-pointers. By default it would be off, the leak checker
105// wouldn't follow interior-pointers and there would only be 3 categories:
106// R, DL, IL.
107//
108// If turned on, then it would show 7 categories (R, DL, IL, DR/DL, IR/IL,
109// IR/IL/DL, IL/DL). That output is harder to understand but it's your own
110// damn fault for using interior-pointers...
111//
112// ----
113//
114// Also, why are two blank lines printed between each loss record?
115//
116// ----
117//
118// Also, --show-reachable is a bad name because it also turns on the showing
119// of indirectly leaked blocks(!) It would be better named --show-all or
120// --show-all-heap-blocks, because that's the end result.
121//
122// ----
123//
124// Also, the VALGRIND_LEAK_CHECK and VALGRIND_QUICK_LEAK_CHECK aren't great
125// names. VALGRIND_FULL_LEAK_CHECK and VALGRIND_SUMMARY_LEAK_CHECK would be
126// better.
127//
128// ----
129//
130// Also, VALGRIND_COUNT_LEAKS and VALGRIND_COUNT_LEAK_BLOCKS aren't great as
131// they combine direct leaks and indirect leaks into one. New, more precise
132// ones (they'll need new names) would be good. If more categories are
133// used, as per the --follow-interior-pointers option, they should be
134// updated accordingly. And they should use a struct to return the values.
135//
136// ----
137//
138// Also, for this case:
139//
140// (4) p4 BBB ---> AAA
141//
142// BBB is definitely directly lost. AAA is definitely indirectly lost.
143// Here's the relevant loss records printed for a full check (each block is
144// 16 bytes):
145//
146// ==20397== 16 bytes in 1 blocks are indirectly lost in loss record 9 of 15
147// ==20397== at 0x4C2694E: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:177)
148// ==20397== by 0x400521: mk (leak-cases.c:49)
149// ==20397== by 0x400578: main (leak-cases.c:72)
150//
151// ==20397== 32 (16 direct, 16 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely
152// lost in loss record 14 of 15
153// ==20397== at 0x4C2694E: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:177)
154// ==20397== by 0x400521: mk (leak-cases.c:49)
155// ==20397== by 0x400580: main (leak-cases.c:72)
156//
157// The first one is fine -- it describes AAA.
158//
159// The second one is for BBB. It's correct in that 16 bytes in 1 block are
160// directly lost. It's also correct that 16 are indirectly lost as a result,
161// but it means that AAA is being counted twice in the loss records. (It's
162// not, thankfully, counted twice in the summary counts). Argh.
163//
164// This would be less confusing for the second one:
165//
166// ==20397== 16 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 14
167// of 15 (and 16 bytes in 1 block are indirectly lost as a result; they
168// are mentioned elsewhere (if --show-reachable=yes is given!))
169// ==20397== at 0x4C2694E: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:177)
170// ==20397== by 0x400521: mk (leak-cases.c:49)
171// ==20397== by 0x400580: main (leak-cases.c:72)
172//
173// But ideally we'd present the loss record for the directly lost block and
174// then the resultant indirectly lost blocks and make it clear the
175// dependence. Double argh.
176
177/*------------------------------------------------------------*/
178/*--- The actual algorithm. ---*/
179/*------------------------------------------------------------*/
180
181// - Find all the blocks (a.k.a. chunks) to check. Mempool chunks require
182// some special treatment because they can be within malloc'd blocks.
183// - Scan every word in the root set (GP registers and valid
184// non-heap memory words).
185// - First, we skip if it doesn't point to valid memory.
186// - Then, we see if it points to the start or interior of a block. If
187// so, we push the block onto the mark stack and mark it as having been
188// reached.
189// - Then, we process the mark stack, repeating the scanning for each block;
190// this can push more blocks onto the mark stack. We repeat until the
191// mark stack is empty. Each block is marked as definitely or possibly
192// reachable, depending on whether interior-pointers were required to
193// reach it.
194// - At this point we know for every block if it's reachable or not.
195// - We then push each unreached block onto the mark stack, using the block
196// number as the "clique" number.
197// - We process the mark stack again, this time grouping blocks into cliques
198// in order to facilitate the directly/indirectly lost categorisation.
199// - We group blocks by their ExeContexts and categorisation, and print them
200// if --leak-check=full. We also print summary numbers.
201//
202// A note on "cliques":
203// - A directly lost block is one with no pointers to it. An indirectly
204// lost block is one that is pointed to by a directly or indirectly lost
205// block.
206// - Each directly lost block has zero or more indirectly lost blocks
207// hanging off it. All these blocks together form a "clique". The
208// directly lost block is called the "clique leader". The clique number
209// is the number (in lc_chunks[]) of the clique leader.
210// - Actually, a directly lost block may be pointed to if it's part of a
211// cycle. In that case, there may be more than one choice for the clique
212// leader, and the choice is arbitrary. Eg. if you have A-->B and B-->A
213// either A or B could be the clique leader.
214// - Cliques cannot overlap, and will be truncated to avoid this. Eg. if we
215// have A-->C and B-->C, the two cliques will be {A,C} and {B}, or {A} and
216// {B,C} (again the choice is arbitrary). This is because we don't want
217// to count a block as indirectly lost more than once.
218//
219// A note on 'is_prior_definite':
220// - This is a boolean used in various places that indicates if the chain
221// up to the prior node (prior to the one being considered) is definite.
222// - In the clique == -1 case:
223// - if True it means that the prior node is a root-set node, or that the
224// prior node is a block which is reachable from the root-set via
225// start-pointers.
226// - if False it means that the prior node is a block that is only
227// reachable from the root-set via a path including at least one
228// interior-pointer.
229// - In the clique != -1 case, currently it's always True because we treat
230// start-pointers and interior-pointers the same for direct/indirect leak
231// checking. If we added a PossibleIndirectLeak state then this would
232// change.
233
234
235// Define to debug the memory-leak-detector.
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000236#define VG_DEBUG_LEAKCHECK 0
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000237#define VG_DEBUG_CLIQUE 0
238
239#define UMSG(args...) VG_(message)(Vg_UserMsg, ##args)
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000240
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +0000241/*------------------------------------------------------------*/
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000242/*--- Getting the initial chunks, and searching them. ---*/
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +0000243/*------------------------------------------------------------*/
244
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000245// Compare the MC_Chunks by 'data' (i.e. the address of the block).
246static Int compare_MC_Chunks(void* n1, void* n2)
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +0000247{
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000248 MC_Chunk* mc1 = *(MC_Chunk**)n1;
249 MC_Chunk* mc2 = *(MC_Chunk**)n2;
250 if (mc1->data < mc2->data) return -1;
251 if (mc1->data > mc2->data) return 1;
252 return 0;
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +0000253}
254
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000255#if VG_DEBUG_LEAKCHECK
256// Used to sanity-check the fast binary-search mechanism.
257static
258Int find_chunk_for_OLD ( Addr ptr,
259 MC_Chunk** chunks,
260 Int n_chunks )
261
262{
263 Int i;
264 Addr a_lo, a_hi;
265 PROF_EVENT(70, "find_chunk_for_OLD");
266 for (i = 0; i < n_chunks; i++) {
267 PROF_EVENT(71, "find_chunk_for_OLD(loop)");
268 a_lo = chunks[i]->data;
269 a_hi = ((Addr)chunks[i]->data) + chunks[i]->szB;
270 if (a_lo <= ptr && ptr < a_hi)
271 return i;
272 }
273 return -1;
274}
275#endif
276
277// Find the i such that ptr points at or inside the block described by
278// chunks[i]. Return -1 if none found. This assumes that chunks[]
279// has been sorted on the 'data' field.
280static
281Int find_chunk_for ( Addr ptr,
282 MC_Chunk** chunks,
283 Int n_chunks )
284{
285 Addr a_mid_lo, a_mid_hi;
286 Int lo, mid, hi, retVal;
287 // VG_(printf)("find chunk for %p = ", ptr);
288 retVal = -1;
289 lo = 0;
290 hi = n_chunks-1;
291 while (True) {
292 // Invariant: current unsearched space is from lo to hi, inclusive.
293 if (lo > hi) break; // not found
294
295 mid = (lo + hi) / 2;
296 a_mid_lo = chunks[mid]->data;
297 a_mid_hi = chunks[mid]->data + chunks[mid]->szB;
298 // Extent of block 'mid' is [a_mid_lo .. a_mid_hi).
299 // Special-case zero-sized blocks - treat them as if they had
300 // size 1. Not doing so causes them to not cover any address
301 // range at all and so will never be identified as the target of
302 // any pointer, which causes them to be incorrectly reported as
303 // definitely leaked.
304 if (chunks[mid]->szB == 0)
305 a_mid_hi++;
306
307 if (ptr < a_mid_lo) {
308 hi = mid-1;
309 continue;
310 }
311 if (ptr >= a_mid_hi) {
312 lo = mid+1;
313 continue;
314 }
315 tl_assert(ptr >= a_mid_lo && ptr < a_mid_hi);
316 retVal = mid;
317 break;
318 }
319
320# if VG_DEBUG_LEAKCHECK
321 tl_assert(retVal == find_chunk_for_OLD ( ptr, chunks, n_chunks ));
322# endif
323 // VG_(printf)("%d\n", retVal);
324 return retVal;
325}
326
327
328static MC_Chunk**
329find_active_chunks(UInt* pn_chunks)
330{
331 // Our goal is to construct a set of chunks that includes every
332 // mempool chunk, and every malloc region that *doesn't* contain a
333 // mempool chunk.
334 MC_Mempool *mp;
335 MC_Chunk **mallocs, **chunks, *mc;
336 UInt n_mallocs, n_chunks, m, s;
337 Bool *malloc_chunk_holds_a_pool_chunk;
338
339 // First we collect all the malloc chunks into an array and sort it.
340 // We do this because we want to query the chunks by interior
341 // pointers, requiring binary search.
342 mallocs = (MC_Chunk**) VG_(HT_to_array)( MC_(malloc_list), &n_mallocs );
343 if (n_mallocs == 0) {
344 tl_assert(mallocs == NULL);
345 *pn_chunks = 0;
346 return NULL;
347 }
348 VG_(ssort)(mallocs, n_mallocs, sizeof(VgHashNode*), compare_MC_Chunks);
349
350 // Then we build an array containing a Bool for each malloc chunk,
351 // indicating whether it contains any mempools.
352 malloc_chunk_holds_a_pool_chunk = VG_(calloc)( "mc.fas.1",
353 n_mallocs, sizeof(Bool) );
354 n_chunks = n_mallocs;
355
356 // Then we loop over the mempool tables. For each chunk in each
357 // pool, we set the entry in the Bool array corresponding to the
358 // malloc chunk containing the mempool chunk.
359 VG_(HT_ResetIter)(MC_(mempool_list));
360 while ( (mp = VG_(HT_Next)(MC_(mempool_list))) ) {
361 VG_(HT_ResetIter)(mp->chunks);
362 while ( (mc = VG_(HT_Next)(mp->chunks)) ) {
363
364 // We'll need to record this chunk.
365 n_chunks++;
366
367 // Possibly invalidate the malloc holding the beginning of this chunk.
368 m = find_chunk_for(mc->data, mallocs, n_mallocs);
369 if (m != -1 && malloc_chunk_holds_a_pool_chunk[m] == False) {
370 tl_assert(n_chunks > 0);
371 n_chunks--;
372 malloc_chunk_holds_a_pool_chunk[m] = True;
373 }
374
375 // Possibly invalidate the malloc holding the end of this chunk.
376 if (mc->szB > 1) {
377 m = find_chunk_for(mc->data + (mc->szB - 1), mallocs, n_mallocs);
378 if (m != -1 && malloc_chunk_holds_a_pool_chunk[m] == False) {
379 tl_assert(n_chunks > 0);
380 n_chunks--;
381 malloc_chunk_holds_a_pool_chunk[m] = True;
382 }
383 }
384 }
385 }
386 tl_assert(n_chunks > 0);
387
388 // Create final chunk array.
389 chunks = VG_(malloc)("mc.fas.2", sizeof(VgHashNode*) * (n_chunks));
390 s = 0;
391
392 // Copy the mempool chunks and the non-marked malloc chunks into a
393 // combined array of chunks.
394 VG_(HT_ResetIter)(MC_(mempool_list));
395 while ( (mp = VG_(HT_Next)(MC_(mempool_list))) ) {
396 VG_(HT_ResetIter)(mp->chunks);
397 while ( (mc = VG_(HT_Next)(mp->chunks)) ) {
398 tl_assert(s < n_chunks);
399 chunks[s++] = mc;
400 }
401 }
402 for (m = 0; m < n_mallocs; ++m) {
403 if (!malloc_chunk_holds_a_pool_chunk[m]) {
404 tl_assert(s < n_chunks);
405 chunks[s++] = mallocs[m];
406 }
407 }
408 tl_assert(s == n_chunks);
409
410 // Free temporaries.
411 VG_(free)(mallocs);
412 VG_(free)(malloc_chunk_holds_a_pool_chunk);
413
414 *pn_chunks = n_chunks;
415
416 return chunks;
417}
418
419/*------------------------------------------------------------*/
420/*--- The leak detector proper. ---*/
421/*------------------------------------------------------------*/
422
423// Holds extra info about each block during leak checking.
424typedef
425 struct {
426 UInt state:2; // Reachedness.
427 SizeT indirect_szB : (sizeof(SizeT)*8)-2; // If Unreached, how many bytes
428 // are unreachable from here.
429 }
430 LC_Extra;
431
432// An array holding pointers to every chunk we're checking. Sorted by address.
433static MC_Chunk** lc_chunks;
434// How many chunks we're dealing with.
435static Int lc_n_chunks;
436
437// This has the same number of entries as lc_chunks, and each entry
438// in lc_chunks corresponds with the entry here (ie. lc_chunks[i] and
439// lc_extras[i] describe the same block).
440static LC_Extra* lc_extras;
441
442// Records chunks that are currently being processed. Each element in the
443// stack is an index into lc_chunks and lc_extras. Its size is
444// 'lc_n_chunks' because in the worst case that's how many chunks could be
445// pushed onto it (actually I think the maximum is lc_n_chunks-1 but let's
446// be conservative).
447static Int* lc_markstack;
448// The index of the top element of the stack; -1 if the stack is empty, 0 if
449// the stack has one element, 1 if it has two, etc.
450static Int lc_markstack_top;
451
452// Keeps track of how many bytes of memory we've scanned, for printing.
453// (Nb: We don't keep track of how many register bytes we've scanned.)
454static SizeT lc_scanned_szB;
455
456
457SizeT MC_(bytes_leaked) = 0;
458SizeT MC_(bytes_indirect) = 0;
459SizeT MC_(bytes_dubious) = 0;
460SizeT MC_(bytes_reachable) = 0;
461SizeT MC_(bytes_suppressed) = 0;
462
463SizeT MC_(blocks_leaked) = 0;
464SizeT MC_(blocks_indirect) = 0;
465SizeT MC_(blocks_dubious) = 0;
466SizeT MC_(blocks_reachable) = 0;
467SizeT MC_(blocks_suppressed) = 0;
468
sewardj45f4e7c2005-09-27 19:20:21 +0000469
470/* TODO: GIVE THIS A PROPER HOME
njn1d0825f2006-03-27 11:37:07 +0000471 TODO: MERGE THIS WITH DUPLICATE IN m_main.c and coredump-elf.c.
sewardj45f4e7c2005-09-27 19:20:21 +0000472 Extract from aspacem a vector of the current segment start
473 addresses. The vector is dynamically allocated and should be freed
474 by the caller when done. REQUIRES m_mallocfree to be running.
475 Writes the number of addresses required into *n_acquired. */
476
477static Addr* get_seg_starts ( /*OUT*/Int* n_acquired )
478{
479 Addr* starts;
sewardjae986ca2005-10-12 12:53:20 +0000480 Int n_starts, r = 0;
sewardj45f4e7c2005-09-27 19:20:21 +0000481
482 n_starts = 1;
483 while (True) {
sewardj9c606bd2008-09-18 18:12:50 +0000484 starts = VG_(malloc)( "mc.gss.1", n_starts * sizeof(Addr) );
sewardj45f4e7c2005-09-27 19:20:21 +0000485 if (starts == NULL)
486 break;
487 r = VG_(am_get_segment_starts)( starts, n_starts );
488 if (r >= 0)
489 break;
490 VG_(free)(starts);
491 n_starts *= 2;
492 }
493
494 if (starts == NULL) {
495 *n_acquired = 0;
496 return NULL;
497 }
498
499 *n_acquired = r;
500 return starts;
501}
502
503
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000504// Determines if a pointer is to a chunk. Returns the chunk number et al
505// via call-by-reference.
506static Bool
507lc_is_a_chunk_ptr(Addr ptr, Int* pch_no, MC_Chunk** pch, LC_Extra** pex)
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +0000508{
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000509 Int ch_no;
510 MC_Chunk* ch;
511 LC_Extra* ex;
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +0000512
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000513 // Quick filter.
514 if (!VG_(am_is_valid_for_client)(ptr, 1, VKI_PROT_READ)) {
515 return False;
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000516 } else {
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000517 ch_no = find_chunk_for(ptr, lc_chunks, lc_n_chunks);
518 tl_assert(ch_no >= -1 && ch_no < lc_n_chunks);
519
520 if (ch_no == -1) {
521 return False;
522 } else {
523 // Ok, we've found a pointer to a chunk. Get the MC_Chunk and its
524 // LC_Extra.
525 ch = lc_chunks[ch_no];
526 ex = &(lc_extras[ch_no]);
527
528 tl_assert(ptr >= ch->data);
529 tl_assert(ptr < ch->data + ch->szB + (ch->szB==0 ? 1 : 0));
530
531 if (VG_DEBUG_LEAKCHECK)
532 VG_(printf)("ptr=%#lx -> block %d\n", ptr, ch_no);
533
534 *pch_no = ch_no;
535 *pch = ch;
536 *pex = ex;
537
538 return True;
539 }
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000540 }
541}
542
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000543// Push a chunk (well, just its index) onto the mark stack.
544static void lc_push(Int ch_no, MC_Chunk* ch)
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000545{
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000546 if (0) {
547 VG_(printf)("pushing %#lx-%#lx\n", ch->data, ch->data + ch->szB);
548 }
549 lc_markstack_top++;
550 tl_assert(lc_markstack_top < lc_n_chunks);
551 lc_markstack[lc_markstack_top] = ch_no;
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000552}
553
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000554// Return the index of the chunk on the top of the mark stack, or -1 if
555// there isn't one.
556static Bool lc_pop(Int* ret)
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000557{
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000558 if (-1 == lc_markstack_top) {
559 return False;
560 } else {
561 tl_assert(0 <= lc_markstack_top && lc_markstack_top < lc_n_chunks);
562 *ret = lc_markstack[lc_markstack_top];
563 lc_markstack_top--;
564 return True;
565 }
566}
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000567
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000568
569// If 'ptr' is pointing to a heap-allocated block which hasn't been seen
570// before, push it onto the mark stack.
571static void
572lc_push_without_clique_if_a_chunk_ptr(Addr ptr, Bool is_prior_definite)
573{
574 Int ch_no;
575 MC_Chunk* ch;
576 LC_Extra* ex;
577
578 if ( ! lc_is_a_chunk_ptr(ptr, &ch_no, &ch, &ex) )
579 return;
580
581 // Only push it if it hasn't been seen previously.
582 if (ex->state == Unreached) {
583 lc_push(ch_no, ch);
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000584 }
585
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000586 // Possibly upgrade the state, ie. one of:
587 // - Unreached --> Possible
588 // - Unreached --> Reachable
589 // - Possible --> Reachable
590 if (ptr == ch->data && is_prior_definite) {
591 // 'ptr' points to the start of the block, and the prior node is
592 // definite, which means that this block is definitely reachable.
593 ex->state = Reachable;
594
595 } else if (ex->state == Unreached) {
596 // Either 'ptr' is a interior-pointer, or the prior node isn't definite,
597 // which means that we can only mark this block as possibly reachable.
598 ex->state = Possible;
599 }
600}
601
602static void
603lc_push_if_a_chunk_ptr_register(Addr ptr)
604{
605 lc_push_without_clique_if_a_chunk_ptr(ptr, /*is_prior_definite*/True);
606}
607
608// If ptr is pointing to a heap-allocated block which hasn't been seen
609// before, push it onto the mark stack. Clique is the index of the
610// clique leader.
611static void
612lc_push_with_clique_if_a_chunk_ptr(Addr ptr, Int clique)
613{
614 Int ch_no;
615 MC_Chunk* ch;
616 LC_Extra* ex;
617
618 tl_assert(0 <= clique && clique < lc_n_chunks);
619
620 if ( ! lc_is_a_chunk_ptr(ptr, &ch_no, &ch, &ex) )
621 return;
622
623 // If it's not Unreached, it's already been handled so ignore it.
624 // If ch_no==clique, it's the clique leader, which means this is a cyclic
625 // structure; again ignore it because it's already been handled.
626 if (ex->state == Unreached && ch_no != clique) {
627 // Note that, unlike reachable blocks, we currently don't distinguish
628 // between start-pointers and interior-pointers here. We probably
629 // should, though.
630 ex->state = IndirectLeak;
631 lc_push(ch_no, ch);
632
633 // Add the block to the clique, and add its size to the
634 // clique-leader's indirect size. Also, if the new block was
635 // itself a clique leader, it isn't any more, so add its
636 // indirect_szB to the new clique leader.
637 if (VG_DEBUG_CLIQUE) {
638 if (ex->indirect_szB > 0)
639 VG_(printf)(" clique %d joining clique %d adding %lu+%lu\n",
640 ch_no, clique, (SizeT)ch->szB, (SizeT)ex->indirect_szB);
641 else
642 VG_(printf)(" block %d joining clique %d adding %lu\n",
643 ch_no, clique, (SizeT)ch->szB);
644 }
645
646 lc_extras[clique].indirect_szB += ch->szB;
647 lc_extras[clique].indirect_szB += ex->indirect_szB;
648 ex->indirect_szB = 0; // Shouldn't matter.
649 }
650}
651
652static void
653lc_push_if_a_chunk_ptr(Addr ptr, Int clique, Bool is_prior_definite)
654{
655 if (-1 == clique)
656 lc_push_without_clique_if_a_chunk_ptr(ptr, is_prior_definite);
657 else
658 lc_push_with_clique_if_a_chunk_ptr(ptr, clique);
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000659}
660
sewardj45d94cc2005-04-20 14:44:11 +0000661
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000662static jmp_buf memscan_jmpbuf;
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000663
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000664static
665void scan_all_valid_memory_catcher ( Int sigNo, Addr addr )
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000666{
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000667 if (0)
668 VG_(printf)("OUCH! sig=%d addr=%#lx\n", sigNo, addr);
669 if (sigNo == VKI_SIGSEGV || sigNo == VKI_SIGBUS)
670 __builtin_longjmp(memscan_jmpbuf, 1);
671}
672
673// Scan a block of memory between [start, start+len). This range may
674// be bogus, inaccessable, or otherwise strange; we deal with it. For each
675// valid aligned word we assume it's a pointer to a chunk a push the chunk
676// onto the mark stack if so.
677static void
678lc_scan_memory(Addr start, SizeT len, Bool is_prior_definite, Int clique)
679{
680 Addr ptr = VG_ROUNDUP(start, sizeof(Addr));
njn13bfd852005-06-02 03:52:53 +0000681 Addr end = VG_ROUNDDN(start+len, sizeof(Addr));
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000682 vki_sigset_t sigmask;
683
684 if (VG_DEBUG_LEAKCHECK)
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000685 VG_(printf)("scan %#lx-%#lx (%lu)\n", start, end, len);
686
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000687 VG_(sigprocmask)(VKI_SIG_SETMASK, NULL, &sigmask);
njn695c16e2005-03-27 03:40:28 +0000688 VG_(set_fault_catcher)(scan_all_valid_memory_catcher);
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000689
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000690 // We might be in the middle of a page. Do a cheap check to see if
691 // it's valid; if not, skip onto the next page.
sewardj45f4e7c2005-09-27 19:20:21 +0000692 if (!VG_(am_is_valid_for_client)(ptr, sizeof(Addr), VKI_PROT_READ))
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000693 ptr = VG_PGROUNDUP(ptr+1); // First page is bad - skip it.
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000694
sewardj05fe85e2005-04-27 22:46:36 +0000695 while (ptr < end) {
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000696 Addr addr;
697
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000698 // Skip invalid chunks.
699 if ( ! MC_(is_within_valid_secondary)(ptr) ) {
700 ptr = VG_ROUNDUP(ptr+1, SM_SIZE);
701 continue;
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000702 }
703
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000704 // Look to see if this page seems reasonable.
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000705 if ((ptr % VKI_PAGE_SIZE) == 0) {
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000706 if (!VG_(am_is_valid_for_client)(ptr, sizeof(Addr), VKI_PROT_READ)) {
707 ptr += VKI_PAGE_SIZE; // Bad page - skip it.
708 continue;
709 }
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000710 }
711
712 if (__builtin_setjmp(memscan_jmpbuf) == 0) {
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000713 if ( MC_(is_valid_aligned_word)(ptr) ) {
714 lc_scanned_szB += sizeof(Addr);
715 addr = *(Addr *)ptr;
716 // If we get here, the scanned word is in valid memory. Now
717 // let's see if its contents point to a chunk.
718 lc_push_if_a_chunk_ptr(addr, clique, is_prior_definite);
719 } else if (0 && VG_DEBUG_LEAKCHECK) {
720 VG_(printf)("%#lx not valid\n", ptr);
721 }
722 ptr += sizeof(Addr);
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000723 } else {
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000724 // We need to restore the signal mask, because we were
725 // longjmped out of a signal handler.
726 VG_(sigprocmask)(VKI_SIG_SETMASK, &sigmask, NULL);
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000727
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000728 ptr = VG_PGROUNDUP(ptr+1); // Bad page - skip it.
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000729 }
730 }
731
732 VG_(sigprocmask)(VKI_SIG_SETMASK, &sigmask, NULL);
733 VG_(set_fault_catcher)(NULL);
734}
735
sewardj45d94cc2005-04-20 14:44:11 +0000736
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000737// Process the mark stack until empty.
738static void lc_process_markstack(Int clique)
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000739{
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000740 Int top;
741 Bool is_prior_definite;
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000742
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000743 while (lc_pop(&top)) {
744 tl_assert(top >= 0 && top < lc_n_chunks);
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000745
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000746 // See comment about 'is_prior_definite' at the top to understand this.
747 is_prior_definite = ( Possible != lc_extras[top].state );
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000748
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000749 lc_scan_memory(lc_chunks[top]->data, lc_chunks[top]->szB,
750 is_prior_definite, clique);
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000751 }
752}
753
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +0000754static Word cmp_LossRecordKey_LossRecord(const void* key, const void* elem)
755{
756 LossRecordKey* a = (LossRecordKey*)key;
757 LossRecordKey* b = &(((LossRecord*)elem)->key);
758
759 // Compare on states first because that's fast.
760 if (a->state < b->state) return -1;
761 if (a->state > b->state) return 1;
762 // Ok, the states are equal. Now compare the locations, which is slower.
763 if (VG_(eq_ExeContext)(
764 MC_(clo_leak_resolution), a->allocated_at, b->allocated_at))
765 return 0;
766 // Different locations. Ordering is arbitrary, just use the ec pointer.
767 if (a->allocated_at < b->allocated_at) return -1;
768 if (a->allocated_at > b->allocated_at) return 1;
769 VG_(tool_panic)("bad LossRecord comparison");
770}
771
772static Int cmp_LossRecords(void* va, void* vb)
773{
774 LossRecord* lr_a = *(LossRecord**)va;
775 LossRecord* lr_b = *(LossRecord**)vb;
776 SizeT total_szB_a = lr_a->szB + lr_a->indirect_szB;
777 SizeT total_szB_b = lr_b->szB + lr_b->indirect_szB;
778
779 // First compare by sizes.
780 if (total_szB_a < total_szB_b) return -1;
781 if (total_szB_a > total_szB_b) return 1;
782 // If size are equal, compare by states.
783 if (lr_a->key.state < lr_b->key.state) return -1;
784 if (lr_a->key.state > lr_b->key.state) return 1;
785 return 0;
786}
787
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000788static void print_results(ThreadId tid, Bool is_full_check)
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000789{
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +0000790 Int i, n_lossrecords;
791 OSet* lr_table;
792 LossRecord** lr_array;
793 LossRecord* lr;
794 Bool is_suppressed;
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000795
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +0000796 // Create the lr_table, which holds the loss records.
797 lr_table =
798 VG_(OSetGen_Create)(offsetof(LossRecord, key),
799 cmp_LossRecordKey_LossRecord,
800 VG_(malloc), "mc.pr.1",
801 VG_(free));
802
803 // Convert the chunks into loss records, merging them where appropriate.
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000804 for (i = 0; i < lc_n_chunks; i++) {
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +0000805 MC_Chunk* ch = lc_chunks[i];
806 LC_Extra* ex = &(lc_extras)[i];
807 LossRecord* old_lr;
808 LossRecordKey lrkey;
809 lrkey.state = ex->state;
810 lrkey.allocated_at = ch->where;
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000811
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +0000812 old_lr = VG_(OSetGen_Lookup)(lr_table, &lrkey);
813 if (old_lr) {
814 // We found an existing loss record matching this chunk. Update the
815 // loss record's details in-situ. This is safe because we don't
816 // change the elements used as the OSet key.
817 old_lr->szB += ch->szB;
818 old_lr->indirect_szB += ex->indirect_szB;
819 old_lr->num_blocks++;
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000820 } else {
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +0000821 // No existing loss record matches this chunk. Create a new loss
822 // record, initialise it from the chunk, and insert it into lr_table.
823 lr = VG_(OSetGen_AllocNode)(lr_table, sizeof(LossRecord));
824 lr->key = lrkey;
825 lr->szB = ch->szB;
826 lr->indirect_szB = ex->indirect_szB;
827 lr->num_blocks = 1;
828 VG_(OSetGen_Insert)(lr_table, lr);
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000829 }
830 }
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +0000831 n_lossrecords = VG_(OSetGen_Size)(lr_table);
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000832
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +0000833 // Create an array of pointers to the loss records.
834 lr_array = VG_(malloc)("mc.pr.2", n_lossrecords * sizeof(LossRecord*));
835 i = 0;
836 VG_(OSetGen_ResetIter)(lr_table);
837 while ( (lr = VG_(OSetGen_Next)(lr_table)) ) {
838 lr_array[i++] = lr;
839 }
840 tl_assert(i == n_lossrecords);
841
842 // Sort the array by loss record sizes.
843 VG_(ssort)(lr_array, n_lossrecords, sizeof(LossRecord*),
844 cmp_LossRecords);
845
846 // Zero totals.
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000847 MC_(blocks_leaked) = MC_(bytes_leaked) = 0;
848 MC_(blocks_indirect) = MC_(bytes_indirect) = 0;
849 MC_(blocks_dubious) = MC_(bytes_dubious) = 0;
850 MC_(blocks_reachable) = MC_(bytes_reachable) = 0;
851 MC_(blocks_suppressed) = MC_(bytes_suppressed) = 0;
852
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +0000853 // Print the loss records (in size order) and collect summary stats.
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000854 for (i = 0; i < n_lossrecords; i++) {
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +0000855 Bool print_record;
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000856 // Rules for printing:
857 // - We don't show suppressed loss records ever (and that's controlled
858 // within the error manager).
859 // - We show non-suppressed loss records that are not "reachable" if
860 // --leak-check=yes.
861 // - We show all non-suppressed loss records if --leak-check=yes and
862 // --show-reachable=yes.
863 //
864 // Nb: here "reachable" means Reachable *or* IndirectLeak; note that
865 // this is different to "still reachable" used elsewhere because it
866 // includes indirectly lost blocks!
867 //
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +0000868 lr = lr_array[i];
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000869 print_record = is_full_check &&
870 ( MC_(clo_show_reachable) ||
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +0000871 Unreached == lr->key.state ||
872 Possible == lr->key.state );
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000873 is_suppressed =
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +0000874 MC_(record_leak_error) ( tid, i+1, n_lossrecords, lr, print_record );
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000875
876 if (is_suppressed) {
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +0000877 MC_(blocks_suppressed) += lr->num_blocks;
878 MC_(bytes_suppressed) += lr->szB;
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000879
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +0000880 } else if (Unreached == lr->key.state) {
881 MC_(blocks_leaked) += lr->num_blocks;
882 MC_(bytes_leaked) += lr->szB;
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000883
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +0000884 } else if (IndirectLeak == lr->key.state) {
885 MC_(blocks_indirect) += lr->num_blocks;
886 MC_(bytes_indirect) += lr->szB;
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000887
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +0000888 } else if (Possible == lr->key.state) {
889 MC_(blocks_dubious) += lr->num_blocks;
890 MC_(bytes_dubious) += lr->szB;
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000891
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +0000892 } else if (Reachable == lr->key.state) {
893 MC_(blocks_reachable) += lr->num_blocks;
894 MC_(bytes_reachable) += lr->szB;
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000895
896 } else {
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000897 VG_(tool_panic)("unknown loss mode");
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000898 }
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000899 }
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000900
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000901 if (VG_(clo_verbosity) > 0 && !VG_(clo_xml)) {
902 UMSG("");
903 UMSG("LEAK SUMMARY:");
904 UMSG(" definitely lost: %'lu bytes in %'lu blocks.",
905 MC_(bytes_leaked), MC_(blocks_leaked) );
906 UMSG(" indirectly lost: %'lu bytes in %'lu blocks.",
907 MC_(bytes_indirect), MC_(blocks_indirect) );
908 UMSG(" possibly lost: %'lu bytes in %'lu blocks.",
909 MC_(bytes_dubious), MC_(blocks_dubious) );
910 UMSG(" still reachable: %'lu bytes in %'lu blocks.",
911 MC_(bytes_reachable), MC_(blocks_reachable) );
912 UMSG(" suppressed: %'lu bytes in %'lu blocks.",
913 MC_(bytes_suppressed), MC_(blocks_suppressed) );
914 if (!is_full_check &&
915 (MC_(blocks_leaked) + MC_(blocks_indirect) +
916 MC_(blocks_dubious) + MC_(blocks_reachable)) > 0) {
917 UMSG("Rerun with --leak-check=full to see details of leaked memory.");
918 }
919 if (is_full_check &&
920 MC_(blocks_reachable) > 0 && !MC_(clo_show_reachable))
921 {
922 UMSG("Reachable blocks (those to which a pointer was found) are not shown.");
923 UMSG("To see them, rerun with: --leak-check=full --show-reachable=yes");
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000924 }
925 }
926}
927
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000928/*------------------------------------------------------------*/
929/*--- Top-level entry point. ---*/
930/*------------------------------------------------------------*/
sewardj3cf26a52006-07-27 23:48:53 +0000931
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000932void MC_(detect_memory_leaks) ( ThreadId tid, LeakCheckMode mode )
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +0000933{
njnb8dca862005-03-14 02:42:44 +0000934 Int i;
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +0000935
sewardj76754cf2005-03-14 00:14:04 +0000936 tl_assert(mode != LC_Off);
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +0000937
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000938 // Get the chunks, stop if there were none.
939 lc_chunks = find_active_chunks(&lc_n_chunks);
940 if (lc_n_chunks == 0) {
941 tl_assert(lc_chunks == NULL);
sewardj71bc3cb2005-05-19 00:25:45 +0000942 if (VG_(clo_verbosity) >= 1 && !VG_(clo_xml)) {
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000943 UMSG("All heap blocks were freed -- no leaks are possible.");
sewardj37d06f22003-09-17 21:48:26 +0000944 }
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +0000945 return;
946 }
947
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000948 // Sort the array so blocks are in ascending order in memory.
949 VG_(ssort)(lc_chunks, lc_n_chunks, sizeof(VgHashNode*), compare_MC_Chunks);
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +0000950
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000951 // Sanity check -- make sure they're in order.
952 for (i = 0; i < lc_n_chunks-1; i++) {
953 tl_assert( lc_chunks[i]->data <= lc_chunks[i+1]->data);
954 }
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +0000955
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000956 // Sanity check -- make sure they don't overlap. But do allow exact
957 // duplicates. If this assertion fails, it may mean that the application
958 // has done something stupid with VALGRIND_MALLOCLIKE_BLOCK client
959 // requests, specifically, has made overlapping requests (which are
960 // nonsensical). Another way to screw up is to use
961 // VALGRIND_MALLOCLIKE_BLOCK for stack locations; again nonsensical.
962 for (i = 0; i < lc_n_chunks-1; i++) {
963 MC_Chunk* ch1 = lc_chunks[i];
964 MC_Chunk* ch2 = lc_chunks[i+1];
965 Bool nonsense_overlap = ! (
966 // Normal case - no overlap.
967 (ch1->data + ch1->szB <= ch2->data) ||
968 // Degenerate case: exact duplicates.
969 (ch1->data == ch2->data && ch1->szB == ch2->szB)
970 );
971 if (nonsense_overlap) {
972 UMSG("Block [0x%lx, 0x%lx) overlaps with block [0x%lx, 0x%lx)",
973 ch1->data, (ch1->data + ch1->szB),
974 ch2->data, (ch2->data + ch2->szB));
975 }
976 tl_assert (!nonsense_overlap);
977 }
978
979 // Initialise lc_extras.
980 lc_extras = VG_(malloc)( "mc.dml.2", lc_n_chunks * sizeof(LC_Extra) );
981 for (i = 0; i < lc_n_chunks; i++) {
982 lc_extras[i].state = Unreached;
983 lc_extras[i].indirect_szB = 0;
984 }
985
986 // Initialise lc_markstack.
987 lc_markstack = VG_(malloc)( "mc.dml.2", lc_n_chunks * sizeof(Int) );
988 for (i = 0; i < lc_n_chunks; i++) {
989 lc_markstack[i] = -1;
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000990 }
991 lc_markstack_top = -1;
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +0000992
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000993 // Verbosity.
994 if (VG_(clo_verbosity) > 0 && !VG_(clo_xml))
995 UMSG( "searching for pointers to %'d not-freed blocks.", lc_n_chunks );
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000996
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000997 // Scan the memory root-set, pushing onto the mark stack any blocks
998 // pointed to.
999 {
1000 Int n_seg_starts;
1001 Addr* seg_starts = get_seg_starts( &n_seg_starts );
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +00001002
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001003 tl_assert(seg_starts && n_seg_starts > 0);
sewardjde3ad732006-07-27 23:12:17 +00001004
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001005 lc_scanned_szB = 0;
sewardjde3ad732006-07-27 23:12:17 +00001006
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001007 // VG_(am_show_nsegments)( 0, "leakcheck");
1008 for (i = 0; i < n_seg_starts; i++) {
1009 SizeT seg_size;
1010 NSegment const* seg = VG_(am_find_nsegment)( seg_starts[i] );
1011 tl_assert(seg);
1012
1013 if (seg->kind != SkFileC && seg->kind != SkAnonC) continue;
1014 if (!(seg->hasR && seg->hasW)) continue;
1015 if (seg->isCH) continue;
1016
1017 // Don't poke around in device segments as this may cause
1018 // hangs. Exclude /dev/zero just in case someone allocated
1019 // memory by explicitly mapping /dev/zero.
1020 if (seg->kind == SkFileC
1021 && (VKI_S_ISCHR(seg->mode) || VKI_S_ISBLK(seg->mode))) {
1022 HChar* dev_name = VG_(am_get_filename)( (NSegment*)seg );
1023 if (dev_name && 0 == VG_(strcmp)(dev_name, "/dev/zero")) {
1024 // Don't skip /dev/zero.
1025 } else {
1026 // Skip this device mapping.
1027 continue;
1028 }
1029 }
1030
1031 if (0)
1032 VG_(printf)("ACCEPT %2d %#lx %#lx\n", i, seg->start, seg->end);
1033
1034 // Scan the segment. We use -1 for the clique number, because this
1035 // is a root-set.
1036 seg_size = seg->end - seg->start + 1;
1037 if (VG_(clo_verbosity) > 2) {
1038 VG_(message)(Vg_DebugMsg,
1039 " Scanning root segment: %#lx..%#lx (%lu)",
1040 seg->start, seg->end, seg_size);
1041 }
1042 lc_scan_memory(seg->start, seg_size, /*is_prior_definite*/True, -1);
1043 }
sewardj45f4e7c2005-09-27 19:20:21 +00001044 }
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +00001045
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001046 // Scan GP registers for chunk pointers.
1047 VG_(apply_to_GP_regs)(lc_push_if_a_chunk_ptr_register);
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +00001048
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001049 // Process the pushed blocks. After this, every block that is reachable
1050 // from the root-set has been traced.
1051 lc_process_markstack(/*clique*/-1);
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +00001052
sewardj71bc3cb2005-05-19 00:25:45 +00001053 if (VG_(clo_verbosity) > 0 && !VG_(clo_xml))
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001054 UMSG("checked %'lu bytes.", lc_scanned_szB);
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +00001055
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001056 // Trace all the leaked blocks to determine which are directly leaked and
1057 // which are indirectly leaked. For each Unreached block, push it onto
1058 // the mark stack, and find all the as-yet-Unreached blocks reachable
1059 // from it. These form a clique and are marked IndirectLeak, and their
1060 // size is added to the clique leader's indirect size. If one of the
1061 // found blocks was itself a clique leader (from a previous clique), then
1062 // the cliques are merged.
1063 for (i = 0; i < lc_n_chunks; i++) {
1064 MC_Chunk* ch = lc_chunks[i];
1065 LC_Extra* ex = &(lc_extras[i]);
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +00001066
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001067 if (VG_DEBUG_CLIQUE)
1068 VG_(printf)("cliques: %d at %#lx -> Loss state %d\n",
1069 i, ch->data, ex->state);
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +00001070
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001071 tl_assert(lc_markstack_top == -1);
1072
1073 if (ex->state == Unreached) {
1074 if (VG_DEBUG_CLIQUE)
1075 VG_(printf)("%d: gathering clique %#lx\n", i, ch->data);
1076
1077 // Push this Unreached block onto the stack and process it.
1078 lc_push(i, ch);
1079 lc_process_markstack(i);
1080
1081 tl_assert(lc_markstack_top == -1);
1082 tl_assert(ex->state == Unreached);
nethercote0f19bce2003-12-02 10:17:44 +00001083 }
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +00001084 }
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001085
1086 print_results( tid, ( mode == LC_Full ? True : False ) );
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +00001087
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001088 VG_(free) ( lc_chunks );
1089 VG_(free) ( lc_extras );
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +00001090 VG_(free) ( lc_markstack );
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +00001091}
1092
1093/*--------------------------------------------------------------------*/
njn1d0825f2006-03-27 11:37:07 +00001094/*--- end ---*/
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +00001095/*--------------------------------------------------------------------*/
1096