blob: 8d88237f393b4481b446e8e5a68496125adbed66 [file] [log] [blame]
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +00001FileCheck - Flexible pattern matching file verifier
2===================================================
3
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +00004SYNOPSIS
5--------
6
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +00007:program:`FileCheck` *match-filename* [*--check-prefix=XXX*] [*--strict-whitespace*]
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +00008
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +00009DESCRIPTION
10-----------
11
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +000012:program:`FileCheck` reads two files (one from standard input, and one
13specified on the command line) and uses one to verify the other. This
14behavior is particularly useful for the testsuite, which wants to verify that
15the output of some tool (e.g. :program:`llc`) contains the expected information
16(for example, a movsd from esp or whatever is interesting). This is similar to
17using :program:`grep`, but it is optimized for matching multiple different
18inputs in one file in a specific order.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000019
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +000020The ``match-filename`` file specifies the file that contains the patterns to
Stephen Lina6e877f2013-07-14 18:12:25 +000021match. The file to verify is read from standard input unless the
22:option:`--input-file` option is used.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000023
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000024OPTIONS
25-------
26
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +000027.. option:: -help
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000028
29 Print a summary of command line options.
30
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +000031.. option:: --check-prefix prefix
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000032
Matt Arsenault13df4622013-11-10 02:04:09 +000033 FileCheck searches the contents of ``match-filename`` for patterns to
34 match. By default, these patterns are prefixed with "``CHECK:``".
35 If you'd like to use a different prefix (e.g. because the same input
36 file is checking multiple different tool or options), the
37 :option:`--check-prefix` argument allows you to specify one or more
38 prefixes to match. Multiple prefixes are useful for tests which might
39 change for different run options, but most lines remain the same.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000040
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +000041.. option:: --input-file filename
Eli Bendersky8a7e80f2012-11-07 01:41:30 +000042
43 File to check (defaults to stdin).
44
James Y Knight85913cc2016-02-11 16:46:09 +000045.. option:: --match-full-lines
46
47 By default, FileCheck allows matches of anywhere on a line. This
48 option will require all positive matches to cover an entire
49 line. Leading and trailing whitespace is ignored, unless
50 :option:`--strict-whitespace` is also specified. (Note: negative
51 matches from ``CHECK-NOT`` are not affected by this option!)
52
53 Passing this option is equivalent to inserting ``{{^ *}}`` or
54 ``{{^}}`` before, and ``{{ *$}}`` or ``{{$}}`` after every positive
55 check pattern.
56
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +000057.. option:: --strict-whitespace
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000058
59 By default, FileCheck canonicalizes input horizontal whitespace (spaces and
60 tabs) which causes it to ignore these differences (a space will match a tab).
Guy Benyei5ea04c32013-02-06 20:40:38 +000061 The :option:`--strict-whitespace` argument disables this behavior. End-of-line
Sean Silvab6bfbad2013-06-21 00:27:54 +000062 sequences are canonicalized to UNIX-style ``\n`` in all modes.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000063
Alexander Kornienko56ccdbb2014-07-11 12:39:32 +000064.. option:: --implicit-check-not check-pattern
65
66 Adds implicit negative checks for the specified patterns between positive
67 checks. The option allows writing stricter tests without stuffing them with
Dan Liewa762a132014-07-21 16:39:00 +000068 ``CHECK-NOT``\ s.
Alexander Kornienko56ccdbb2014-07-11 12:39:32 +000069
70 For example, "``--implicit-check-not warning:``" can be useful when testing
71 diagnostic messages from tools that don't have an option similar to ``clang
72 -verify``. With this option FileCheck will verify that input does not contain
73 warnings not covered by any ``CHECK:`` patterns.
74
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +000075.. option:: -version
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000076
77 Show the version number of this program.
78
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000079EXIT STATUS
80-----------
81
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +000082If :program:`FileCheck` verifies that the file matches the expected contents,
83it exits with 0. Otherwise, if not, or if an error occurs, it will exit with a
84non-zero value.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000085
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000086TUTORIAL
87--------
88
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000089FileCheck is typically used from LLVM regression tests, being invoked on the RUN
90line of the test. A simple example of using FileCheck from a RUN line looks
91like this:
92
Dmitri Gribenkoa99fa5b2012-06-12 15:45:07 +000093.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000094
95 ; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -march=x86-64 | FileCheck %s
96
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +000097This syntax says to pipe the current file ("``%s``") into ``llvm-as``, pipe
98that into ``llc``, then pipe the output of ``llc`` into ``FileCheck``. This
99means that FileCheck will be verifying its standard input (the llc output)
100against the filename argument specified (the original ``.ll`` file specified by
101"``%s``"). To see how this works, let's look at the rest of the ``.ll`` file
102(after the RUN line):
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000103
Dmitri Gribenkoa99fa5b2012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000104.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000105
106 define void @sub1(i32* %p, i32 %v) {
107 entry:
108 ; CHECK: sub1:
109 ; CHECK: subl
110 %0 = tail call i32 @llvm.atomic.load.sub.i32.p0i32(i32* %p, i32 %v)
111 ret void
112 }
113
114 define void @inc4(i64* %p) {
115 entry:
116 ; CHECK: inc4:
117 ; CHECK: incq
118 %0 = tail call i64 @llvm.atomic.load.add.i64.p0i64(i64* %p, i64 1)
119 ret void
120 }
121
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000122Here you can see some "``CHECK:``" lines specified in comments. Now you can
123see how the file is piped into ``llvm-as``, then ``llc``, and the machine code
124output is what we are verifying. FileCheck checks the machine code output to
125verify that it matches what the "``CHECK:``" lines specify.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000126
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000127The syntax of the "``CHECK:``" lines is very simple: they are fixed strings that
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000128must occur in order. FileCheck defaults to ignoring horizontal whitespace
129differences (e.g. a space is allowed to match a tab) but otherwise, the contents
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000130of the "``CHECK:``" line is required to match some thing in the test file exactly.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000131
132One nice thing about FileCheck (compared to grep) is that it allows merging
133test cases together into logical groups. For example, because the test above
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000134is checking for the "``sub1:``" and "``inc4:``" labels, it will not match
135unless there is a "``subl``" in between those labels. If it existed somewhere
136else in the file, that would not count: "``grep subl``" matches if "``subl``"
137exists anywhere in the file.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000138
139The FileCheck -check-prefix option
140~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
141
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +0000142The FileCheck :option:`-check-prefix` option allows multiple test
143configurations to be driven from one `.ll` file. This is useful in many
144circumstances, for example, testing different architectural variants with
145:program:`llc`. Here's a simple example:
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000146
Dmitri Gribenkoa99fa5b2012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000147.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000148
149 ; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -mtriple=i686-apple-darwin9 -mattr=sse41 \
Dmitri Gribenko19408a72012-06-12 00:48:47 +0000150 ; RUN: | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=X32
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000151 ; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -mtriple=x86_64-apple-darwin9 -mattr=sse41 \
Dmitri Gribenko19408a72012-06-12 00:48:47 +0000152 ; RUN: | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=X64
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000153
154 define <4 x i32> @pinsrd_1(i32 %s, <4 x i32> %tmp) nounwind {
155 %tmp1 = insertelement <4 x i32>; %tmp, i32 %s, i32 1
156 ret <4 x i32> %tmp1
157 ; X32: pinsrd_1:
158 ; X32: pinsrd $1, 4(%esp), %xmm0
159
160 ; X64: pinsrd_1:
161 ; X64: pinsrd $1, %edi, %xmm0
162 }
163
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000164In this case, we're testing that we get the expected code generation with
165both 32-bit and 64-bit code generation.
166
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000167The "CHECK-NEXT:" directive
168~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
169
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000170Sometimes you want to match lines and would like to verify that matches
171happen on exactly consecutive lines with no other lines in between them. In
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000172this case, you can use "``CHECK:``" and "``CHECK-NEXT:``" directives to specify
173this. If you specified a custom check prefix, just use "``<PREFIX>-NEXT:``".
174For example, something like this works as you'd expect:
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000175
Dmitri Gribenkoa99fa5b2012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000176.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000177
Dmitri Gribenko19408a72012-06-12 00:48:47 +0000178 define void @t2(<2 x double>* %r, <2 x double>* %A, double %B) {
179 %tmp3 = load <2 x double>* %A, align 16
180 %tmp7 = insertelement <2 x double> undef, double %B, i32 0
181 %tmp9 = shufflevector <2 x double> %tmp3,
182 <2 x double> %tmp7,
183 <2 x i32> < i32 0, i32 2 >
184 store <2 x double> %tmp9, <2 x double>* %r, align 16
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000185 ret void
186
187 ; CHECK: t2:
188 ; CHECK: movl 8(%esp), %eax
189 ; CHECK-NEXT: movapd (%eax), %xmm0
190 ; CHECK-NEXT: movhpd 12(%esp), %xmm0
191 ; CHECK-NEXT: movl 4(%esp), %eax
192 ; CHECK-NEXT: movapd %xmm0, (%eax)
193 ; CHECK-NEXT: ret
194 }
195
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000196"``CHECK-NEXT:``" directives reject the input unless there is exactly one
Eli Bendersky2fef6b62012-11-21 22:40:52 +0000197newline between it and the previous directive. A "``CHECK-NEXT:``" cannot be
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000198the first directive in a file.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000199
Duncan P. N. Exon Smithcffbbe92015-03-05 17:00:05 +0000200The "CHECK-SAME:" directive
201~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
202
203Sometimes you want to match lines and would like to verify that matches happen
204on the same line as the previous match. In this case, you can use "``CHECK:``"
205and "``CHECK-SAME:``" directives to specify this. If you specified a custom
206check prefix, just use "``<PREFIX>-SAME:``".
207
208"``CHECK-SAME:``" is particularly powerful in conjunction with "``CHECK-NOT:``"
209(described below).
210
211For example, the following works like you'd expect:
212
213.. code-block:: llvm
214
Duncan P. N. Exon Smitha9308c42015-04-29 16:38:44 +0000215 !0 = !DILocation(line: 5, scope: !1, inlinedAt: !2)
Duncan P. N. Exon Smithcffbbe92015-03-05 17:00:05 +0000216
Duncan P. N. Exon Smitha9308c42015-04-29 16:38:44 +0000217 ; CHECK: !DILocation(line: 5,
Duncan P. N. Exon Smithcffbbe92015-03-05 17:00:05 +0000218 ; CHECK-NOT: column:
219 ; CHECK-SAME: scope: ![[SCOPE:[0-9]+]]
220
221"``CHECK-SAME:``" directives reject the input if there are any newlines between
222it and the previous directive. A "``CHECK-SAME:``" cannot be the first
223directive in a file.
224
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000225The "CHECK-NOT:" directive
226~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
227
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000228The "``CHECK-NOT:``" directive is used to verify that a string doesn't occur
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000229between two matches (or before the first match, or after the last match). For
230example, to verify that a load is removed by a transformation, a test like this
231can be used:
232
Dmitri Gribenkoa99fa5b2012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000233.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000234
235 define i8 @coerce_offset0(i32 %V, i32* %P) {
236 store i32 %V, i32* %P
237
238 %P2 = bitcast i32* %P to i8*
239 %P3 = getelementptr i8* %P2, i32 2
240
241 %A = load i8* %P3
242 ret i8 %A
243 ; CHECK: @coerce_offset0
244 ; CHECK-NOT: load
245 ; CHECK: ret i8
246 }
247
Michael Liao91a1b2c2013-05-14 20:34:12 +0000248The "CHECK-DAG:" directive
249~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
250
251If it's necessary to match strings that don't occur in a strictly sequential
252order, "``CHECK-DAG:``" could be used to verify them between two matches (or
253before the first match, or after the last match). For example, clang emits
254vtable globals in reverse order. Using ``CHECK-DAG:``, we can keep the checks
255in the natural order:
256
257.. code-block:: c++
258
259 // RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -emit-llvm -o - | FileCheck %s
260
261 struct Foo { virtual void method(); };
262 Foo f; // emit vtable
263 // CHECK-DAG: @_ZTV3Foo =
264
265 struct Bar { virtual void method(); };
266 Bar b;
267 // CHECK-DAG: @_ZTV3Bar =
268
Renato Golin58ab84a2013-10-11 18:50:22 +0000269``CHECK-NOT:`` directives could be mixed with ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives to
270exclude strings between the surrounding ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives. As a result,
271the surrounding ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives cannot be reordered, i.e. all
272occurrences matching ``CHECK-DAG:`` before ``CHECK-NOT:`` must not fall behind
273occurrences matching ``CHECK-DAG:`` after ``CHECK-NOT:``. For example,
274
275.. code-block:: llvm
276
277 ; CHECK-DAG: BEFORE
278 ; CHECK-NOT: NOT
279 ; CHECK-DAG: AFTER
280
281This case will reject input strings where ``BEFORE`` occurs after ``AFTER``.
Michael Liao91a1b2c2013-05-14 20:34:12 +0000282
283With captured variables, ``CHECK-DAG:`` is able to match valid topological
284orderings of a DAG with edges from the definition of a variable to its use.
285It's useful, e.g., when your test cases need to match different output
286sequences from the instruction scheduler. For example,
287
288.. code-block:: llvm
289
290 ; CHECK-DAG: add [[REG1:r[0-9]+]], r1, r2
291 ; CHECK-DAG: add [[REG2:r[0-9]+]], r3, r4
292 ; CHECK: mul r5, [[REG1]], [[REG2]]
293
294In this case, any order of that two ``add`` instructions will be allowed.
295
Renato Golin58ab84a2013-10-11 18:50:22 +0000296If you are defining `and` using variables in the same ``CHECK-DAG:`` block,
297be aware that the definition rule can match `after` its use.
298
299So, for instance, the code below will pass:
Michael Liao91a1b2c2013-05-14 20:34:12 +0000300
301.. code-block:: llvm
302
Renato Golin58ab84a2013-10-11 18:50:22 +0000303 ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2:d[0-9]+]][0]
304 ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2]][1]
305 vmov.32 d0[1]
306 vmov.32 d0[0]
Michael Liao91a1b2c2013-05-14 20:34:12 +0000307
Renato Golin58ab84a2013-10-11 18:50:22 +0000308While this other code, will not:
309
310.. code-block:: llvm
311
312 ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2:d[0-9]+]][0]
313 ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2]][1]
314 vmov.32 d1[1]
315 vmov.32 d0[0]
316
317While this can be very useful, it's also dangerous, because in the case of
318register sequence, you must have a strong order (read before write, copy before
319use, etc). If the definition your test is looking for doesn't match (because
320of a bug in the compiler), it may match further away from the use, and mask
321real bugs away.
322
323In those cases, to enforce the order, use a non-DAG directive between DAG-blocks.
Michael Liao91a1b2c2013-05-14 20:34:12 +0000324
Stephen Linf8bd2e52013-07-12 14:51:05 +0000325The "CHECK-LABEL:" directive
Bill Wendlingc02da462013-07-30 08:26:24 +0000326~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Stephen Linf8bd2e52013-07-12 14:51:05 +0000327
328Sometimes in a file containing multiple tests divided into logical blocks, one
329or more ``CHECK:`` directives may inadvertently succeed by matching lines in a
330later block. While an error will usually eventually be generated, the check
331flagged as causing the error may not actually bear any relationship to the
332actual source of the problem.
333
334In order to produce better error messages in these cases, the "``CHECK-LABEL:``"
335directive can be used. It is treated identically to a normal ``CHECK``
Stephen Linb9464072013-07-18 23:26:58 +0000336directive except that FileCheck makes an additional assumption that a line
337matched by the directive cannot also be matched by any other check present in
338``match-filename``; this is intended to be used for lines containing labels or
339other unique identifiers. Conceptually, the presence of ``CHECK-LABEL`` divides
340the input stream into separate blocks, each of which is processed independently,
341preventing a ``CHECK:`` directive in one block matching a line in another block.
342For example,
Stephen Linf8bd2e52013-07-12 14:51:05 +0000343
344.. code-block:: llvm
345
346 define %struct.C* @C_ctor_base(%struct.C* %this, i32 %x) {
347 entry:
348 ; CHECK-LABEL: C_ctor_base:
349 ; CHECK: mov [[SAVETHIS:r[0-9]+]], r0
350 ; CHECK: bl A_ctor_base
351 ; CHECK: mov r0, [[SAVETHIS]]
352 %0 = bitcast %struct.C* %this to %struct.A*
353 %call = tail call %struct.A* @A_ctor_base(%struct.A* %0)
354 %1 = bitcast %struct.C* %this to %struct.B*
355 %call2 = tail call %struct.B* @B_ctor_base(%struct.B* %1, i32 %x)
356 ret %struct.C* %this
357 }
358
359 define %struct.D* @D_ctor_base(%struct.D* %this, i32 %x) {
360 entry:
361 ; CHECK-LABEL: D_ctor_base:
362
363The use of ``CHECK-LABEL:`` directives in this case ensures that the three
364``CHECK:`` directives only accept lines corresponding to the body of the
365``@C_ctor_base`` function, even if the patterns match lines found later in
Stephen Linb9464072013-07-18 23:26:58 +0000366the file. Furthermore, if one of these three ``CHECK:`` directives fail,
367FileCheck will recover by continuing to the next block, allowing multiple test
368failures to be detected in a single invocation.
Stephen Linf8bd2e52013-07-12 14:51:05 +0000369
370There is no requirement that ``CHECK-LABEL:`` directives contain strings that
371correspond to actual syntactic labels in a source or output language: they must
372simply uniquely match a single line in the file being verified.
373
374``CHECK-LABEL:`` directives cannot contain variable definitions or uses.
375
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000376FileCheck Pattern Matching Syntax
377~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
378
Paul Robinson282b3d32015-03-05 23:04:26 +0000379All FileCheck directives take a pattern to match.
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000380For most uses of FileCheck, fixed string matching is perfectly sufficient. For
381some things, a more flexible form of matching is desired. To support this,
382FileCheck allows you to specify regular expressions in matching strings,
383surrounded by double braces: ``{{yourregex}}``. Because we want to use fixed
384string matching for a majority of what we do, FileCheck has been designed to
385support mixing and matching fixed string matching with regular expressions.
386This allows you to write things like this:
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000387
Dmitri Gribenkoa99fa5b2012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000388.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000389
390 ; CHECK: movhpd {{[0-9]+}}(%esp), {{%xmm[0-7]}}
391
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000392In this case, any offset from the ESP register will be allowed, and any xmm
393register will be allowed.
394
395Because regular expressions are enclosed with double braces, they are
396visually distinct, and you don't need to use escape characters within the double
397braces like you would in C. In the rare case that you want to match double
398braces explicitly from the input, you can use something ugly like
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000399``{{[{][{]}}`` as your pattern.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000400
401FileCheck Variables
402~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
403
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000404It is often useful to match a pattern and then verify that it occurs again
405later in the file. For codegen tests, this can be useful to allow any register,
Eli Bendersky4ca99ba2012-12-01 22:03:57 +0000406but verify that that register is used consistently later. To do this,
407:program:`FileCheck` allows named variables to be defined and substituted into
408patterns. Here is a simple example:
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000409
Dmitri Gribenkoa99fa5b2012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000410.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000411
412 ; CHECK: test5:
413 ; CHECK: notw [[REGISTER:%[a-z]+]]
Chad Rosierfd7469c2012-05-24 21:17:47 +0000414 ; CHECK: andw {{.*}}[[REGISTER]]
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000415
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000416The first check line matches a regex ``%[a-z]+`` and captures it into the
417variable ``REGISTER``. The second line verifies that whatever is in
Eli Bendersky4ca99ba2012-12-01 22:03:57 +0000418``REGISTER`` occurs later in the file after an "``andw``". :program:`FileCheck`
419variable references are always contained in ``[[ ]]`` pairs, and their names can
420be formed with the regex ``[a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z0-9]*``. If a colon follows the name,
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000421then it is a definition of the variable; otherwise, it is a use.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000422
Eli Bendersky4ca99ba2012-12-01 22:03:57 +0000423:program:`FileCheck` variables can be defined multiple times, and uses always
424get the latest value. Variables can also be used later on the same line they
425were defined on. For example:
426
427.. code-block:: llvm
428
429 ; CHECK: op [[REG:r[0-9]+]], [[REG]]
430
431Can be useful if you want the operands of ``op`` to be the same register,
432and don't care exactly which register it is.
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000433
Alexander Kornienko92987fb2012-11-14 21:07:37 +0000434FileCheck Expressions
435~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
436
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +0000437Sometimes there's a need to verify output which refers line numbers of the
438match file, e.g. when testing compiler diagnostics. This introduces a certain
439fragility of the match file structure, as "``CHECK:``" lines contain absolute
440line numbers in the same file, which have to be updated whenever line numbers
441change due to text addition or deletion.
Alexander Kornienko92987fb2012-11-14 21:07:37 +0000442
443To support this case, FileCheck allows using ``[[@LINE]]``,
444``[[@LINE+<offset>]]``, ``[[@LINE-<offset>]]`` expressions in patterns. These
445expressions expand to a number of the line where a pattern is located (with an
446optional integer offset).
447
448This way match patterns can be put near the relevant test lines and include
449relative line number references, for example:
450
451.. code-block:: c++
452
453 // CHECK: test.cpp:[[@LINE+4]]:6: error: expected ';' after top level declarator
454 // CHECK-NEXT: {{^int a}}
455 // CHECK-NEXT: {{^ \^}}
456 // CHECK-NEXT: {{^ ;}}
457 int a
458