blob: ae662b5215cc6160a1999370a2ff2bf0b2de0291 [file] [log] [blame]
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +00001FileCheck - Flexible pattern matching file verifier
2===================================================
3
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +00004SYNOPSIS
5--------
6
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +00007:program:`FileCheck` *match-filename* [*--check-prefix=XXX*] [*--strict-whitespace*]
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +00008
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +00009DESCRIPTION
10-----------
11
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +000012:program:`FileCheck` reads two files (one from standard input, and one
13specified on the command line) and uses one to verify the other. This
14behavior is particularly useful for the testsuite, which wants to verify that
15the output of some tool (e.g. :program:`llc`) contains the expected information
16(for example, a movsd from esp or whatever is interesting). This is similar to
17using :program:`grep`, but it is optimized for matching multiple different
18inputs in one file in a specific order.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000019
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +000020The ``match-filename`` file specifies the file that contains the patterns to
Stephen Lina6e877f2013-07-14 18:12:25 +000021match. The file to verify is read from standard input unless the
22:option:`--input-file` option is used.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000023
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000024OPTIONS
25-------
26
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +000027.. option:: -help
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000028
29 Print a summary of command line options.
30
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +000031.. option:: --check-prefix prefix
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000032
Matt Arsenault13df4622013-11-10 02:04:09 +000033 FileCheck searches the contents of ``match-filename`` for patterns to
34 match. By default, these patterns are prefixed with "``CHECK:``".
35 If you'd like to use a different prefix (e.g. because the same input
36 file is checking multiple different tool or options), the
37 :option:`--check-prefix` argument allows you to specify one or more
38 prefixes to match. Multiple prefixes are useful for tests which might
39 change for different run options, but most lines remain the same.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000040
Daniel Sandersad875c22016-06-14 16:42:05 +000041.. option:: --check-prefixes prefix1,prefix2,...
42
43 An alias of :option:`--check-prefix` that allows multiple prefixes to be
44 specified as a comma separated list.
45
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +000046.. option:: --input-file filename
Eli Bendersky8a7e80f2012-11-07 01:41:30 +000047
48 File to check (defaults to stdin).
49
James Y Knight85913cc2016-02-11 16:46:09 +000050.. option:: --match-full-lines
51
52 By default, FileCheck allows matches of anywhere on a line. This
53 option will require all positive matches to cover an entire
54 line. Leading and trailing whitespace is ignored, unless
55 :option:`--strict-whitespace` is also specified. (Note: negative
56 matches from ``CHECK-NOT`` are not affected by this option!)
57
58 Passing this option is equivalent to inserting ``{{^ *}}`` or
59 ``{{^}}`` before, and ``{{ *$}}`` or ``{{$}}`` after every positive
60 check pattern.
61
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +000062.. option:: --strict-whitespace
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000063
64 By default, FileCheck canonicalizes input horizontal whitespace (spaces and
65 tabs) which causes it to ignore these differences (a space will match a tab).
Guy Benyei5ea04c32013-02-06 20:40:38 +000066 The :option:`--strict-whitespace` argument disables this behavior. End-of-line
Sean Silvab6bfbad2013-06-21 00:27:54 +000067 sequences are canonicalized to UNIX-style ``\n`` in all modes.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000068
Alexander Kornienko56ccdbb2014-07-11 12:39:32 +000069.. option:: --implicit-check-not check-pattern
70
71 Adds implicit negative checks for the specified patterns between positive
72 checks. The option allows writing stricter tests without stuffing them with
Dan Liewa762a132014-07-21 16:39:00 +000073 ``CHECK-NOT``\ s.
Alexander Kornienko56ccdbb2014-07-11 12:39:32 +000074
75 For example, "``--implicit-check-not warning:``" can be useful when testing
76 diagnostic messages from tools that don't have an option similar to ``clang
77 -verify``. With this option FileCheck will verify that input does not contain
78 warnings not covered by any ``CHECK:`` patterns.
79
Artem Belevichf55e72a2017-03-09 17:59:04 +000080.. option:: --enable-var-scope
81
82 Enables scope for regex variables.
83
84 Variables with names that start with ``$`` are considered global and
85 remain set throughout the file.
86
87 All other variables get undefined after each encountered ``CHECK-LABEL``.
88
Alexander Richardson46e1fd62017-11-07 13:24:44 +000089.. option:: -D<VAR=VALUE>
90
91 Sets a filecheck variable ``VAR`` with value ``VALUE`` that can be used in
92 ``CHECK:`` lines.
93
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +000094.. option:: -version
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000095
96 Show the version number of this program.
97
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000098EXIT STATUS
99-----------
100
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +0000101If :program:`FileCheck` verifies that the file matches the expected contents,
102it exits with 0. Otherwise, if not, or if an error occurs, it will exit with a
103non-zero value.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000104
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000105TUTORIAL
106--------
107
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000108FileCheck is typically used from LLVM regression tests, being invoked on the RUN
109line of the test. A simple example of using FileCheck from a RUN line looks
110like this:
111
Dmitri Gribenkoa99fa5b2012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000112.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000113
114 ; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -march=x86-64 | FileCheck %s
115
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000116This syntax says to pipe the current file ("``%s``") into ``llvm-as``, pipe
117that into ``llc``, then pipe the output of ``llc`` into ``FileCheck``. This
118means that FileCheck will be verifying its standard input (the llc output)
119against the filename argument specified (the original ``.ll`` file specified by
120"``%s``"). To see how this works, let's look at the rest of the ``.ll`` file
121(after the RUN line):
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000122
Dmitri Gribenkoa99fa5b2012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000123.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000124
125 define void @sub1(i32* %p, i32 %v) {
126 entry:
127 ; CHECK: sub1:
128 ; CHECK: subl
129 %0 = tail call i32 @llvm.atomic.load.sub.i32.p0i32(i32* %p, i32 %v)
130 ret void
131 }
132
133 define void @inc4(i64* %p) {
134 entry:
135 ; CHECK: inc4:
136 ; CHECK: incq
137 %0 = tail call i64 @llvm.atomic.load.add.i64.p0i64(i64* %p, i64 1)
138 ret void
139 }
140
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000141Here you can see some "``CHECK:``" lines specified in comments. Now you can
142see how the file is piped into ``llvm-as``, then ``llc``, and the machine code
143output is what we are verifying. FileCheck checks the machine code output to
144verify that it matches what the "``CHECK:``" lines specify.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000145
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000146The syntax of the "``CHECK:``" lines is very simple: they are fixed strings that
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000147must occur in order. FileCheck defaults to ignoring horizontal whitespace
148differences (e.g. a space is allowed to match a tab) but otherwise, the contents
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000149of the "``CHECK:``" line is required to match some thing in the test file exactly.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000150
151One nice thing about FileCheck (compared to grep) is that it allows merging
152test cases together into logical groups. For example, because the test above
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000153is checking for the "``sub1:``" and "``inc4:``" labels, it will not match
154unless there is a "``subl``" in between those labels. If it existed somewhere
155else in the file, that would not count: "``grep subl``" matches if "``subl``"
156exists anywhere in the file.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000157
158The FileCheck -check-prefix option
159~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
160
Renato Golin124f2592016-07-20 12:16:38 +0000161The FileCheck `-check-prefix` option allows multiple test
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +0000162configurations to be driven from one `.ll` file. This is useful in many
163circumstances, for example, testing different architectural variants with
164:program:`llc`. Here's a simple example:
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000165
Dmitri Gribenkoa99fa5b2012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000166.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000167
168 ; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -mtriple=i686-apple-darwin9 -mattr=sse41 \
Dmitri Gribenko19408a72012-06-12 00:48:47 +0000169 ; RUN: | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=X32
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000170 ; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -mtriple=x86_64-apple-darwin9 -mattr=sse41 \
Dmitri Gribenko19408a72012-06-12 00:48:47 +0000171 ; RUN: | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=X64
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000172
173 define <4 x i32> @pinsrd_1(i32 %s, <4 x i32> %tmp) nounwind {
174 %tmp1 = insertelement <4 x i32>; %tmp, i32 %s, i32 1
175 ret <4 x i32> %tmp1
176 ; X32: pinsrd_1:
177 ; X32: pinsrd $1, 4(%esp), %xmm0
178
179 ; X64: pinsrd_1:
180 ; X64: pinsrd $1, %edi, %xmm0
181 }
182
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000183In this case, we're testing that we get the expected code generation with
184both 32-bit and 64-bit code generation.
185
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000186The "CHECK-NEXT:" directive
187~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
188
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000189Sometimes you want to match lines and would like to verify that matches
190happen on exactly consecutive lines with no other lines in between them. In
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000191this case, you can use "``CHECK:``" and "``CHECK-NEXT:``" directives to specify
192this. If you specified a custom check prefix, just use "``<PREFIX>-NEXT:``".
193For example, something like this works as you'd expect:
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000194
Dmitri Gribenkoa99fa5b2012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000195.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000196
Dmitri Gribenko19408a72012-06-12 00:48:47 +0000197 define void @t2(<2 x double>* %r, <2 x double>* %A, double %B) {
198 %tmp3 = load <2 x double>* %A, align 16
199 %tmp7 = insertelement <2 x double> undef, double %B, i32 0
200 %tmp9 = shufflevector <2 x double> %tmp3,
201 <2 x double> %tmp7,
202 <2 x i32> < i32 0, i32 2 >
203 store <2 x double> %tmp9, <2 x double>* %r, align 16
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000204 ret void
205
206 ; CHECK: t2:
207 ; CHECK: movl 8(%esp), %eax
208 ; CHECK-NEXT: movapd (%eax), %xmm0
209 ; CHECK-NEXT: movhpd 12(%esp), %xmm0
210 ; CHECK-NEXT: movl 4(%esp), %eax
211 ; CHECK-NEXT: movapd %xmm0, (%eax)
212 ; CHECK-NEXT: ret
213 }
214
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000215"``CHECK-NEXT:``" directives reject the input unless there is exactly one
Eli Bendersky2fef6b62012-11-21 22:40:52 +0000216newline between it and the previous directive. A "``CHECK-NEXT:``" cannot be
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000217the first directive in a file.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000218
Duncan P. N. Exon Smithcffbbe92015-03-05 17:00:05 +0000219The "CHECK-SAME:" directive
220~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
221
222Sometimes you want to match lines and would like to verify that matches happen
223on the same line as the previous match. In this case, you can use "``CHECK:``"
224and "``CHECK-SAME:``" directives to specify this. If you specified a custom
225check prefix, just use "``<PREFIX>-SAME:``".
226
227"``CHECK-SAME:``" is particularly powerful in conjunction with "``CHECK-NOT:``"
228(described below).
229
230For example, the following works like you'd expect:
231
232.. code-block:: llvm
233
Duncan P. N. Exon Smitha9308c42015-04-29 16:38:44 +0000234 !0 = !DILocation(line: 5, scope: !1, inlinedAt: !2)
Duncan P. N. Exon Smithcffbbe92015-03-05 17:00:05 +0000235
Duncan P. N. Exon Smitha9308c42015-04-29 16:38:44 +0000236 ; CHECK: !DILocation(line: 5,
Duncan P. N. Exon Smithcffbbe92015-03-05 17:00:05 +0000237 ; CHECK-NOT: column:
238 ; CHECK-SAME: scope: ![[SCOPE:[0-9]+]]
239
240"``CHECK-SAME:``" directives reject the input if there are any newlines between
241it and the previous directive. A "``CHECK-SAME:``" cannot be the first
242directive in a file.
243
James Henderson5507f662018-06-26 15:15:45 +0000244The "CHECK-EMPTY:" directive
James Hendersonc307b002018-06-26 15:29:09 +0000245~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
James Henderson5507f662018-06-26 15:15:45 +0000246
247If you need to check that the next line has nothing on it, not even whitespace,
248you can use the "``CHECK-EMPTY:``" directive.
249
250.. code-block:: llvm
251
252 foo
253
254 bar
255 ; CHECK: foo
256 ; CHECK-EMPTY:
257 ; CHECK-NEXT: bar
258
259Just like "``CHECK-NEXT:``" the directive will fail if there is more than one
260newline before it finds the next blank line, and it cannot be the first
261directive in a file.
262
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000263The "CHECK-NOT:" directive
264~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
265
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000266The "``CHECK-NOT:``" directive is used to verify that a string doesn't occur
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000267between two matches (or before the first match, or after the last match). For
268example, to verify that a load is removed by a transformation, a test like this
269can be used:
270
Dmitri Gribenkoa99fa5b2012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000271.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000272
273 define i8 @coerce_offset0(i32 %V, i32* %P) {
274 store i32 %V, i32* %P
275
276 %P2 = bitcast i32* %P to i8*
277 %P3 = getelementptr i8* %P2, i32 2
278
279 %A = load i8* %P3
280 ret i8 %A
281 ; CHECK: @coerce_offset0
282 ; CHECK-NOT: load
283 ; CHECK: ret i8
284 }
285
Michael Liao91a1b2c2013-05-14 20:34:12 +0000286The "CHECK-DAG:" directive
287~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
288
289If it's necessary to match strings that don't occur in a strictly sequential
290order, "``CHECK-DAG:``" could be used to verify them between two matches (or
291before the first match, or after the last match). For example, clang emits
292vtable globals in reverse order. Using ``CHECK-DAG:``, we can keep the checks
293in the natural order:
294
295.. code-block:: c++
296
297 // RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -emit-llvm -o - | FileCheck %s
298
299 struct Foo { virtual void method(); };
300 Foo f; // emit vtable
301 // CHECK-DAG: @_ZTV3Foo =
302
303 struct Bar { virtual void method(); };
304 Bar b;
305 // CHECK-DAG: @_ZTV3Bar =
306
Renato Golin58ab84a2013-10-11 18:50:22 +0000307``CHECK-NOT:`` directives could be mixed with ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives to
308exclude strings between the surrounding ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives. As a result,
309the surrounding ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives cannot be reordered, i.e. all
310occurrences matching ``CHECK-DAG:`` before ``CHECK-NOT:`` must not fall behind
311occurrences matching ``CHECK-DAG:`` after ``CHECK-NOT:``. For example,
312
313.. code-block:: llvm
314
315 ; CHECK-DAG: BEFORE
316 ; CHECK-NOT: NOT
317 ; CHECK-DAG: AFTER
318
319This case will reject input strings where ``BEFORE`` occurs after ``AFTER``.
Michael Liao91a1b2c2013-05-14 20:34:12 +0000320
321With captured variables, ``CHECK-DAG:`` is able to match valid topological
322orderings of a DAG with edges from the definition of a variable to its use.
323It's useful, e.g., when your test cases need to match different output
324sequences from the instruction scheduler. For example,
325
326.. code-block:: llvm
327
328 ; CHECK-DAG: add [[REG1:r[0-9]+]], r1, r2
329 ; CHECK-DAG: add [[REG2:r[0-9]+]], r3, r4
330 ; CHECK: mul r5, [[REG1]], [[REG2]]
331
332In this case, any order of that two ``add`` instructions will be allowed.
333
Renato Golin58ab84a2013-10-11 18:50:22 +0000334If you are defining `and` using variables in the same ``CHECK-DAG:`` block,
335be aware that the definition rule can match `after` its use.
336
337So, for instance, the code below will pass:
Michael Liao91a1b2c2013-05-14 20:34:12 +0000338
Renato Golin124f2592016-07-20 12:16:38 +0000339.. code-block:: text
Michael Liao91a1b2c2013-05-14 20:34:12 +0000340
Renato Golin58ab84a2013-10-11 18:50:22 +0000341 ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2:d[0-9]+]][0]
342 ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2]][1]
343 vmov.32 d0[1]
344 vmov.32 d0[0]
Michael Liao91a1b2c2013-05-14 20:34:12 +0000345
Renato Golin58ab84a2013-10-11 18:50:22 +0000346While this other code, will not:
347
Renato Golin124f2592016-07-20 12:16:38 +0000348.. code-block:: text
Renato Golin58ab84a2013-10-11 18:50:22 +0000349
350 ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2:d[0-9]+]][0]
351 ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2]][1]
352 vmov.32 d1[1]
353 vmov.32 d0[0]
354
355While this can be very useful, it's also dangerous, because in the case of
356register sequence, you must have a strong order (read before write, copy before
357use, etc). If the definition your test is looking for doesn't match (because
358of a bug in the compiler), it may match further away from the use, and mask
359real bugs away.
360
361In those cases, to enforce the order, use a non-DAG directive between DAG-blocks.
Michael Liao91a1b2c2013-05-14 20:34:12 +0000362
Stephen Linf8bd2e52013-07-12 14:51:05 +0000363The "CHECK-LABEL:" directive
Bill Wendlingc02da462013-07-30 08:26:24 +0000364~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Stephen Linf8bd2e52013-07-12 14:51:05 +0000365
366Sometimes in a file containing multiple tests divided into logical blocks, one
367or more ``CHECK:`` directives may inadvertently succeed by matching lines in a
368later block. While an error will usually eventually be generated, the check
369flagged as causing the error may not actually bear any relationship to the
370actual source of the problem.
371
372In order to produce better error messages in these cases, the "``CHECK-LABEL:``"
373directive can be used. It is treated identically to a normal ``CHECK``
Stephen Linb9464072013-07-18 23:26:58 +0000374directive except that FileCheck makes an additional assumption that a line
375matched by the directive cannot also be matched by any other check present in
376``match-filename``; this is intended to be used for lines containing labels or
377other unique identifiers. Conceptually, the presence of ``CHECK-LABEL`` divides
378the input stream into separate blocks, each of which is processed independently,
379preventing a ``CHECK:`` directive in one block matching a line in another block.
Artem Belevichf55e72a2017-03-09 17:59:04 +0000380If ``--enable-var-scope`` is in effect, all local variables are cleared at the
381beginning of the block.
382
Stephen Linb9464072013-07-18 23:26:58 +0000383For example,
Stephen Linf8bd2e52013-07-12 14:51:05 +0000384
385.. code-block:: llvm
386
387 define %struct.C* @C_ctor_base(%struct.C* %this, i32 %x) {
388 entry:
389 ; CHECK-LABEL: C_ctor_base:
390 ; CHECK: mov [[SAVETHIS:r[0-9]+]], r0
391 ; CHECK: bl A_ctor_base
392 ; CHECK: mov r0, [[SAVETHIS]]
393 %0 = bitcast %struct.C* %this to %struct.A*
394 %call = tail call %struct.A* @A_ctor_base(%struct.A* %0)
395 %1 = bitcast %struct.C* %this to %struct.B*
396 %call2 = tail call %struct.B* @B_ctor_base(%struct.B* %1, i32 %x)
397 ret %struct.C* %this
398 }
399
400 define %struct.D* @D_ctor_base(%struct.D* %this, i32 %x) {
401 entry:
402 ; CHECK-LABEL: D_ctor_base:
403
404The use of ``CHECK-LABEL:`` directives in this case ensures that the three
405``CHECK:`` directives only accept lines corresponding to the body of the
406``@C_ctor_base`` function, even if the patterns match lines found later in
Stephen Linb9464072013-07-18 23:26:58 +0000407the file. Furthermore, if one of these three ``CHECK:`` directives fail,
408FileCheck will recover by continuing to the next block, allowing multiple test
409failures to be detected in a single invocation.
Stephen Linf8bd2e52013-07-12 14:51:05 +0000410
411There is no requirement that ``CHECK-LABEL:`` directives contain strings that
412correspond to actual syntactic labels in a source or output language: they must
413simply uniquely match a single line in the file being verified.
414
415``CHECK-LABEL:`` directives cannot contain variable definitions or uses.
416
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000417FileCheck Pattern Matching Syntax
418~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
419
Paul Robinson282b3d32015-03-05 23:04:26 +0000420All FileCheck directives take a pattern to match.
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000421For most uses of FileCheck, fixed string matching is perfectly sufficient. For
422some things, a more flexible form of matching is desired. To support this,
423FileCheck allows you to specify regular expressions in matching strings,
Sjoerd Meijer9a26a7e2017-10-13 14:02:36 +0000424surrounded by double braces: ``{{yourregex}}``. FileCheck implements a POSIX
425regular expression matcher; it supports Extended POSIX regular expressions
426(ERE). Because we want to use fixed string matching for a majority of what we
427do, FileCheck has been designed to support mixing and matching fixed string
428matching with regular expressions. This allows you to write things like this:
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000429
Dmitri Gribenkoa99fa5b2012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000430.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000431
432 ; CHECK: movhpd {{[0-9]+}}(%esp), {{%xmm[0-7]}}
433
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000434In this case, any offset from the ESP register will be allowed, and any xmm
435register will be allowed.
436
437Because regular expressions are enclosed with double braces, they are
438visually distinct, and you don't need to use escape characters within the double
439braces like you would in C. In the rare case that you want to match double
440braces explicitly from the input, you can use something ugly like
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000441``{{[{][{]}}`` as your pattern.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000442
443FileCheck Variables
444~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
445
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000446It is often useful to match a pattern and then verify that it occurs again
447later in the file. For codegen tests, this can be useful to allow any register,
Eli Bendersky4ca99ba2012-12-01 22:03:57 +0000448but verify that that register is used consistently later. To do this,
449:program:`FileCheck` allows named variables to be defined and substituted into
450patterns. Here is a simple example:
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000451
Dmitri Gribenkoa99fa5b2012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000452.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000453
454 ; CHECK: test5:
455 ; CHECK: notw [[REGISTER:%[a-z]+]]
Chad Rosierfd7469c2012-05-24 21:17:47 +0000456 ; CHECK: andw {{.*}}[[REGISTER]]
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000457
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000458The first check line matches a regex ``%[a-z]+`` and captures it into the
459variable ``REGISTER``. The second line verifies that whatever is in
Eli Bendersky4ca99ba2012-12-01 22:03:57 +0000460``REGISTER`` occurs later in the file after an "``andw``". :program:`FileCheck`
461variable references are always contained in ``[[ ]]`` pairs, and their names can
Sjoerd Meijer9a26a7e2017-10-13 14:02:36 +0000462be formed with the regex ``[a-zA-Z_][a-zA-Z0-9_]*``. If a colon follows the name,
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000463then it is a definition of the variable; otherwise, it is a use.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000464
Eli Bendersky4ca99ba2012-12-01 22:03:57 +0000465:program:`FileCheck` variables can be defined multiple times, and uses always
466get the latest value. Variables can also be used later on the same line they
467were defined on. For example:
468
469.. code-block:: llvm
470
471 ; CHECK: op [[REG:r[0-9]+]], [[REG]]
472
473Can be useful if you want the operands of ``op`` to be the same register,
474and don't care exactly which register it is.
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000475
Artem Belevichf55e72a2017-03-09 17:59:04 +0000476If ``--enable-var-scope`` is in effect, variables with names that
477start with ``$`` are considered to be global. All others variables are
478local. All local variables get undefined at the beginning of each
479CHECK-LABEL block. Global variables are not affected by CHECK-LABEL.
480This makes it easier to ensure that individual tests are not affected
481by variables set in preceding tests.
482
Alexander Kornienko92987fb2012-11-14 21:07:37 +0000483FileCheck Expressions
484~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
485
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +0000486Sometimes there's a need to verify output which refers line numbers of the
487match file, e.g. when testing compiler diagnostics. This introduces a certain
488fragility of the match file structure, as "``CHECK:``" lines contain absolute
489line numbers in the same file, which have to be updated whenever line numbers
490change due to text addition or deletion.
Alexander Kornienko92987fb2012-11-14 21:07:37 +0000491
492To support this case, FileCheck allows using ``[[@LINE]]``,
493``[[@LINE+<offset>]]``, ``[[@LINE-<offset>]]`` expressions in patterns. These
494expressions expand to a number of the line where a pattern is located (with an
495optional integer offset).
496
497This way match patterns can be put near the relevant test lines and include
498relative line number references, for example:
499
500.. code-block:: c++
501
502 // CHECK: test.cpp:[[@LINE+4]]:6: error: expected ';' after top level declarator
503 // CHECK-NEXT: {{^int a}}
504 // CHECK-NEXT: {{^ \^}}
505 // CHECK-NEXT: {{^ ;}}
506 int a
507
Wolfgang Pieb0b4509e2016-06-27 23:59:00 +0000508Matching Newline Characters
509~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
510
511To match newline characters in regular expressions the character class
512``[[:space:]]`` can be used. For example, the following pattern:
513
514.. code-block:: c++
515
516 // CHECK: DW_AT_location [DW_FORM_sec_offset] ([[DLOC:0x[0-9a-f]+]]){{[[:space:]].*}}"intd"
517
518matches output of the form (from llvm-dwarfdump):
519
Renato Golin124f2592016-07-20 12:16:38 +0000520.. code-block:: text
Wolfgang Pieb0b4509e2016-06-27 23:59:00 +0000521
522 DW_AT_location [DW_FORM_sec_offset] (0x00000233)
523 DW_AT_name [DW_FORM_strp] ( .debug_str[0x000000c9] = "intd")
524
525letting us set the :program:`FileCheck` variable ``DLOC`` to the desired value
526``0x00000233``, extracted from the line immediately preceding "``intd``".