blob: 67f794ad61c73a1970d2a45b26a0f6c413dda989 [file] [log] [blame]
Chris Lattner71c7ec92002-08-30 20:28:10 +00001//===- LoadValueNumbering.cpp - Load Value #'ing Implementation -*- C++ -*-===//
John Criswellb576c942003-10-20 19:43:21 +00002//
3// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
4//
5// This file was developed by the LLVM research group and is distributed under
6// the University of Illinois Open Source License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
7//
8//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
Chris Lattner71c7ec92002-08-30 20:28:10 +00009//
10// This file implements a value numbering pass that value #'s load instructions.
11// To do this, it finds lexically identical load instructions, and uses alias
12// analysis to determine which loads are guaranteed to produce the same value.
13//
14// This pass builds off of another value numbering pass to implement value
15// numbering for non-load instructions. It uses Alias Analysis so that it can
16// disambiguate the load instructions. The more powerful these base analyses
17// are, the more powerful the resultant analysis will be.
18//
19//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
20
21#include "llvm/Analysis/LoadValueNumbering.h"
22#include "llvm/Analysis/ValueNumbering.h"
23#include "llvm/Analysis/AliasAnalysis.h"
24#include "llvm/Analysis/Dominators.h"
Chris Lattnerf98d8d82003-02-26 19:27:35 +000025#include "llvm/Target/TargetData.h"
Chris Lattner71c7ec92002-08-30 20:28:10 +000026#include "llvm/Pass.h"
Chris Lattneraed2c6d2003-06-29 00:53:34 +000027#include "llvm/Type.h"
Chris Lattner71c7ec92002-08-30 20:28:10 +000028#include "llvm/iMemory.h"
29#include "llvm/BasicBlock.h"
30#include "llvm/Support/CFG.h"
Chris Lattner71c7ec92002-08-30 20:28:10 +000031#include <set>
Chris Lattner270db362004-02-05 05:51:40 +000032using namespace llvm;
Brian Gaeked0fde302003-11-11 22:41:34 +000033
Chris Lattner71c7ec92002-08-30 20:28:10 +000034namespace {
Chris Lattner28c6cf22003-06-16 12:06:41 +000035 // FIXME: This should not be a FunctionPass.
Chris Lattner71c7ec92002-08-30 20:28:10 +000036 struct LoadVN : public FunctionPass, public ValueNumbering {
37
38 /// Pass Implementation stuff. This doesn't do any analysis.
39 ///
40 bool runOnFunction(Function &) { return false; }
41
42 /// getAnalysisUsage - Does not modify anything. It uses Value Numbering
43 /// and Alias Analysis.
44 ///
45 virtual void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const;
46
47 /// getEqualNumberNodes - Return nodes with the same value number as the
48 /// specified Value. This fills in the argument vector with any equal
49 /// values.
50 ///
51 virtual void getEqualNumberNodes(Value *V1,
52 std::vector<Value*> &RetVals) const;
Chris Lattner71c7ec92002-08-30 20:28:10 +000053 };
54
55 // Register this pass...
56 RegisterOpt<LoadVN> X("load-vn", "Load Value Numbering");
57
58 // Declare that we implement the ValueNumbering interface
59 RegisterAnalysisGroup<ValueNumbering, LoadVN> Y;
60}
61
Chris Lattner270db362004-02-05 05:51:40 +000062Pass *llvm::createLoadValueNumberingPass() { return new LoadVN(); }
Chris Lattner71c7ec92002-08-30 20:28:10 +000063
64
65/// getAnalysisUsage - Does not modify anything. It uses Value Numbering and
66/// Alias Analysis.
67///
68void LoadVN::getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const {
69 AU.setPreservesAll();
70 AU.addRequired<AliasAnalysis>();
71 AU.addRequired<ValueNumbering>();
72 AU.addRequired<DominatorSet>();
Chris Lattnerf98d8d82003-02-26 19:27:35 +000073 AU.addRequired<TargetData>();
Chris Lattner71c7ec92002-08-30 20:28:10 +000074}
75
Chris Lattner3b303d92004-02-05 17:20:00 +000076static bool isPathTransparentTo(BasicBlock *CurBlock, BasicBlock *Dom,
77 Value *Ptr, unsigned Size, AliasAnalysis &AA,
78 std::set<BasicBlock*> &Visited,
79 std::map<BasicBlock*, bool> &TransparentBlocks){
80 // If we have already checked out this path, or if we reached our destination,
81 // stop searching, returning success.
82 if (CurBlock == Dom || !Visited.insert(CurBlock).second)
83 return true;
84
85 // Check whether this block is known transparent or not.
86 std::map<BasicBlock*, bool>::iterator TBI =
87 TransparentBlocks.lower_bound(CurBlock);
88
89 if (TBI == TransparentBlocks.end() || TBI->first != CurBlock) {
90 // If this basic block can modify the memory location, then the path is not
91 // transparent!
92 if (AA.canBasicBlockModify(*CurBlock, Ptr, Size)) {
93 TransparentBlocks.insert(TBI, std::make_pair(CurBlock, false));
94 return false;
95 }
96 TransparentBlocks.insert(TBI, std::make_pair(CurBlock, true));
97 } else if (!TBI->second)
98 // This block is known non-transparent, so that path can't be either.
99 return false;
100
101 // The current block is known to be transparent. The entire path is
102 // transparent if all of the predecessors paths to the parent is also
103 // transparent to the memory location.
104 for (pred_iterator PI = pred_begin(CurBlock), E = pred_end(CurBlock);
105 PI != E; ++PI)
106 if (!isPathTransparentTo(*PI, Dom, Ptr, Size, AA, Visited,
107 TransparentBlocks))
108 return false;
109 return true;
110}
111
112
Chris Lattner71c7ec92002-08-30 20:28:10 +0000113// getEqualNumberNodes - Return nodes with the same value number as the
114// specified Value. This fills in the argument vector with any equal values.
115//
116void LoadVN::getEqualNumberNodes(Value *V,
117 std::vector<Value*> &RetVals) const {
Chris Lattneraed2c6d2003-06-29 00:53:34 +0000118 // If the alias analysis has any must alias information to share with us, we
Misha Brukman7bc439a2003-09-11 15:31:17 +0000119 // can definitely use it.
Chris Lattneraed2c6d2003-06-29 00:53:34 +0000120 if (isa<PointerType>(V->getType()))
121 getAnalysis<AliasAnalysis>().getMustAliases(V, RetVals);
Chris Lattner71c7ec92002-08-30 20:28:10 +0000122
Chris Lattner57ef9a22004-02-05 05:56:23 +0000123 if (!isa<LoadInst>(V)) {
124 // Not a load instruction? Just chain to the base value numbering
125 // implementation to satisfy the request...
Chris Lattner71c7ec92002-08-30 20:28:10 +0000126 assert(&getAnalysis<ValueNumbering>() != (ValueNumbering*)this &&
127 "getAnalysis() returned this!");
128
Chris Lattner71c7ec92002-08-30 20:28:10 +0000129 return getAnalysis<ValueNumbering>().getEqualNumberNodes(V, RetVals);
130 }
Chris Lattner57ef9a22004-02-05 05:56:23 +0000131
132 // Volatile loads cannot be replaced with the value of other loads.
133 LoadInst *LI = cast<LoadInst>(V);
134 if (LI->isVolatile())
135 return getAnalysis<ValueNumbering>().getEqualNumberNodes(V, RetVals);
136
137 // If we have a load instruction, find all of the load and store instructions
138 // that use the same source operand. We implement this recursively, because
139 // there could be a load of a load of a load that are all identical. We are
140 // guaranteed that this cannot be an infinite recursion because load
141 // instructions would have to pass through a PHI node in order for there to be
142 // a cycle. The PHI node would be handled by the else case here, breaking the
143 // infinite recursion.
144 //
145 std::vector<Value*> PointerSources;
146 getEqualNumberNodes(LI->getOperand(0), PointerSources);
147 PointerSources.push_back(LI->getOperand(0));
148
Chris Lattner3b303d92004-02-05 17:20:00 +0000149 BasicBlock *LoadBB = LI->getParent();
150 Function *F = LoadBB->getParent();
Chris Lattner57ef9a22004-02-05 05:56:23 +0000151
152 // Now that we know the set of equivalent source pointers for the load
153 // instruction, look to see if there are any load or store candidates that are
154 // identical.
155 //
Chris Lattner3b303d92004-02-05 17:20:00 +0000156 std::map<BasicBlock*, std::vector<LoadInst*> > CandidateLoads;
157 std::map<BasicBlock*, std::vector<StoreInst*> > CandidateStores;
Chris Lattner57ef9a22004-02-05 05:56:23 +0000158
159 while (!PointerSources.empty()) {
160 Value *Source = PointerSources.back();
161 PointerSources.pop_back(); // Get a source pointer...
162
163 for (Value::use_iterator UI = Source->use_begin(), UE = Source->use_end();
164 UI != UE; ++UI)
165 if (LoadInst *Cand = dyn_cast<LoadInst>(*UI)) {// Is a load of source?
166 if (Cand->getParent()->getParent() == F && // In the same function?
167 Cand != LI && !Cand->isVolatile()) // Not LI itself?
Chris Lattner3b303d92004-02-05 17:20:00 +0000168 CandidateLoads[Cand->getParent()].push_back(Cand); // Got one...
Chris Lattner57ef9a22004-02-05 05:56:23 +0000169 } else if (StoreInst *Cand = dyn_cast<StoreInst>(*UI)) {
170 if (Cand->getParent()->getParent() == F && !Cand->isVolatile() &&
171 Cand->getOperand(1) == Source) // It's a store THROUGH the ptr...
Chris Lattner3b303d92004-02-05 17:20:00 +0000172 CandidateStores[Cand->getParent()].push_back(Cand);
Chris Lattner57ef9a22004-02-05 05:56:23 +0000173 }
174 }
175
Chris Lattner3b303d92004-02-05 17:20:00 +0000176 // Get alias analysis & dominators.
Chris Lattner57ef9a22004-02-05 05:56:23 +0000177 AliasAnalysis &AA = getAnalysis<AliasAnalysis>();
178 DominatorSet &DomSetInfo = getAnalysis<DominatorSet>();
Chris Lattner3b303d92004-02-05 17:20:00 +0000179 Value *LoadPtr = LI->getOperand(0);
Chris Lattnerf98d8d82003-02-26 19:27:35 +0000180 // Find out how many bytes of memory are loaded by the load instruction...
Chris Lattner3b303d92004-02-05 17:20:00 +0000181 unsigned LoadSize = getAnalysis<TargetData>().getTypeSize(LI->getType());
Chris Lattnerf98d8d82003-02-26 19:27:35 +0000182
Chris Lattner3b303d92004-02-05 17:20:00 +0000183 // Find all of the candidate loads and stores that are in the same block as
184 // the defining instruction.
185 std::set<Instruction*> Instrs;
186 Instrs.insert(CandidateLoads[LoadBB].begin(), CandidateLoads[LoadBB].end());
187 CandidateLoads.erase(LoadBB);
188 Instrs.insert(CandidateStores[LoadBB].begin(), CandidateStores[LoadBB].end());
189 CandidateStores.erase(LoadBB);
Chris Lattner71c7ec92002-08-30 20:28:10 +0000190
Chris Lattner3b303d92004-02-05 17:20:00 +0000191 // Figure out if the load is invalidated from the entry of the block it is in
192 // until the actual instruction. This scans the block backwards from LI. If
193 // we see any candidate load or store instructions, then we know that the
194 // candidates have the same value # as LI.
195 bool LoadInvalidatedInBBBefore = false;
196 for (BasicBlock::iterator I = LI; I != LoadBB->begin(); ) {
197 --I;
198 // If this instruction is a candidate load before LI, we know there are no
199 // invalidating instructions between it and LI, so they have the same value
200 // number.
201 if (isa<LoadInst>(I) && Instrs.count(I)) {
202 RetVals.push_back(I);
203 Instrs.erase(I);
Chris Lattneradf9b902004-02-05 00:36:43 +0000204 }
205
Chris Lattner3b303d92004-02-05 17:20:00 +0000206 if (AA.getModRefInfo(I, LoadPtr, LoadSize) & AliasAnalysis::Mod) {
207 // If the invalidating instruction is a store, and its in our candidate
208 // set, then we can do store-load forwarding: the load has the same value
209 // # as the stored value.
210 if (isa<StoreInst>(I) && Instrs.count(I)) {
211 Instrs.erase(I);
212 RetVals.push_back(I->getOperand(0));
Chris Lattneradf9b902004-02-05 00:36:43 +0000213 }
Chris Lattner3b303d92004-02-05 17:20:00 +0000214
215 LoadInvalidatedInBBBefore = true;
216 break;
Chris Lattneradf9b902004-02-05 00:36:43 +0000217 }
Chris Lattner71c7ec92002-08-30 20:28:10 +0000218 }
Chris Lattner28c6cf22003-06-16 12:06:41 +0000219
Chris Lattner3b303d92004-02-05 17:20:00 +0000220 // Figure out if the load is invalidated between the load and the exit of the
221 // block it is defined in. While we are scanning the current basic block, if
222 // we see any candidate loads, then we know they have the same value # as LI.
Chris Lattner28c6cf22003-06-16 12:06:41 +0000223 //
Chris Lattner3b303d92004-02-05 17:20:00 +0000224 bool LoadInvalidatedInBBAfter = false;
225 for (BasicBlock::iterator I = LI->getNext(); I != LoadBB->end(); ++I) {
226 // If this instruction is a load, then this instruction returns the same
227 // value as LI.
228 if (isa<LoadInst>(I) && Instrs.count(I)) {
229 RetVals.push_back(I);
230 Instrs.erase(I);
231 }
Chris Lattner28c6cf22003-06-16 12:06:41 +0000232
Chris Lattner3b303d92004-02-05 17:20:00 +0000233 if (AA.getModRefInfo(I, LoadPtr, LoadSize) & AliasAnalysis::Mod) {
234 LoadInvalidatedInBBAfter = true;
235 break;
236 }
Chris Lattner28c6cf22003-06-16 12:06:41 +0000237 }
Chris Lattner3b303d92004-02-05 17:20:00 +0000238
239 // If there is anything left in the Instrs set, it could not possibly equal
240 // LI.
241 Instrs.clear();
242
243 // TransparentBlocks - For each basic block the load/store is alive across,
244 // figure out if the pointer is invalidated or not. If it is invalidated, the
245 // boolean is set to false, if it's not it is set to true. If we don't know
246 // yet, the entry is not in the map.
247 std::map<BasicBlock*, bool> TransparentBlocks;
248
249 // Loop over all of the basic blocks that also load the value. If the value
250 // is live across the CFG from the source to destination blocks, and if the
251 // value is not invalidated in either the source or destination blocks, add it
252 // to the equivalence sets.
253 for (std::map<BasicBlock*, std::vector<LoadInst*> >::iterator
254 I = CandidateLoads.begin(), E = CandidateLoads.end(); I != E; ++I) {
255 bool CantEqual = false;
256
257 // Right now we only can handle cases where one load dominates the other.
258 // FIXME: generalize this!
259 BasicBlock *BB1 = I->first, *BB2 = LoadBB;
260 if (DomSetInfo.dominates(BB1, BB2)) {
261 // The other load dominates LI. If the loaded value is killed entering
262 // the LoadBB block, we know the load is not live.
263 if (LoadInvalidatedInBBBefore)
264 CantEqual = true;
265 } else if (DomSetInfo.dominates(BB2, BB1)) {
266 std::swap(BB1, BB2); // Canonicalize
267 // LI dominates the other load. If the loaded value is killed exiting
268 // the LoadBB block, we know the load is not live.
269 if (LoadInvalidatedInBBAfter)
270 CantEqual = true;
271 } else {
272 // None of these loads can VN the same.
273 CantEqual = true;
274 }
275
276 if (!CantEqual) {
277 // Ok, at this point, we know that BB1 dominates BB2, and that there is
278 // nothing in the LI block that kills the loaded value. Check to see if
279 // the value is live across the CFG.
280 std::set<BasicBlock*> Visited;
281 for (pred_iterator PI = pred_begin(BB2), E = pred_end(BB2); PI!=E; ++PI)
282 if (!isPathTransparentTo(*PI, BB1, LoadPtr, LoadSize, AA,
283 Visited, TransparentBlocks)) {
284 // None of these loads can VN the same.
285 CantEqual = true;
286 break;
287 }
288 }
289
290 // If the loads can equal so far, scan the basic block that contains the
291 // loads under consideration to see if they are invalidated in the block.
292 // For any loads that are not invalidated, add them to the equivalence
293 // set!
294 if (!CantEqual) {
295 Instrs.insert(I->second.begin(), I->second.end());
296 if (BB1 == LoadBB) {
297 // If LI dominates the block in question, check to see if any of the
298 // loads in this block are invalidated before they are reached.
299 for (BasicBlock::iterator BBI = I->first->begin(); ; ++BBI) {
300 if (isa<LoadInst>(BBI) && Instrs.count(BBI)) {
301 // The load is in the set!
302 RetVals.push_back(BBI);
303 Instrs.erase(BBI);
304 if (Instrs.empty()) break;
305 } else if (AA.getModRefInfo(BBI, LoadPtr, LoadSize)
306 & AliasAnalysis::Mod) {
307 // If there is a modifying instruction, nothing below it will value
308 // # the same.
309 break;
310 }
311 }
312 } else {
313 // If the block dominates LI, make sure that the loads in the block are
314 // not invalidated before the block ends.
315 BasicBlock::iterator BBI = I->first->end();
316 while (1) {
317 --BBI;
318 if (isa<LoadInst>(BBI) && Instrs.count(BBI)) {
319 // The load is in the set!
320 RetVals.push_back(BBI);
321 Instrs.erase(BBI);
322 if (Instrs.empty()) break;
323 } else if (AA.getModRefInfo(BBI, LoadPtr, LoadSize)
324 & AliasAnalysis::Mod) {
325 // If there is a modifying instruction, nothing above it will value
326 // # the same.
327 break;
328 }
329 }
330 }
331
332 Instrs.clear();
333 }
334 }
335
336 // Handle candidate stores. If the loaded location is clobbered on entrance
337 // to the LoadBB, no store outside of the LoadBB can value number equal, so
338 // quick exit.
339 if (LoadInvalidatedInBBBefore)
340 return;
341
342 for (std::map<BasicBlock*, std::vector<StoreInst*> >::iterator
343 I = CandidateStores.begin(), E = CandidateStores.end(); I != E; ++I)
344 if (DomSetInfo.dominates(I->first, LoadBB)) {
345 // Check to see if the path from the store to the load is transparent
346 // w.r.t. the memory location.
347 bool CantEqual = false;
348 std::set<BasicBlock*> Visited;
349 for (pred_iterator PI = pred_begin(LoadBB), E = pred_end(LoadBB);
350 PI != E; ++PI)
351 if (!isPathTransparentTo(*PI, I->first, LoadPtr, LoadSize, AA,
352 Visited, TransparentBlocks)) {
353 // None of these stores can VN the same.
354 CantEqual = true;
355 break;
356 }
357 Visited.clear();
358 if (!CantEqual) {
359 // Okay, the path from the store block to the load block is clear, and
360 // we know that there are no invalidating instructions from the start
361 // of the load block to the load itself. Now we just scan the store
362 // block.
363
364 BasicBlock::iterator BBI = I->first->end();
365 while (1) {
366 --BBI;
367 if (AA.getModRefInfo(BBI, LoadPtr, LoadSize)& AliasAnalysis::Mod){
368 // If the invalidating instruction is one of the candidates,
369 // then it provides the value the load loads.
370 if (StoreInst *SI = dyn_cast<StoreInst>(BBI))
371 if (std::find(I->second.begin(), I->second.end(), SI) !=
372 I->second.end())
373 RetVals.push_back(SI->getOperand(0));
374 break;
375 }
376 }
377 }
378 }
Chris Lattner28c6cf22003-06-16 12:06:41 +0000379}