Blame - docs/devinfo.html - platform/external/mesa3d

blob: 8ebf80f40e8019f85124f7e2ad2a58eab3022cec [file] [log] [blame]

Andreas Boll	ecd5c7c	2012-06-12 09:05:03 +0200	[diff] [blame]	1	<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
				2	<html lang="en">
				3	<head>
				4	<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
				5	<title>Development Notes</title>
				6	<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="mesa.css">
				7	</head>
				8	<body>
Brian Paul	0b27ace	2003-03-08 17:38:57 +0000	[diff] [blame]	9
Andreas Boll	b5da52a	2012-09-18 18:57:02 +0200	[diff] [blame]	10	<div class="header">
				11	<h1>The Mesa 3D Graphics Library</h1>
				12	</div>
				13
				14	<iframe src="contents.html"></iframe>
				15	<div class="content">
				16
Andreas Boll	ecd5c7c	2012-06-12 09:05:03 +0200	[diff] [blame]	17	<h1>Development Notes</h1>
Brian Paul	0b27ace	2003-03-08 17:38:57 +0000	[diff] [blame]	18
				19
Brian Paul	5183061	2004-08-17 14:08:59 +0000	[diff] [blame]	20	<ul>
Brian Paul	98f2f47	2015-05-25 09:13:09 -0600	[diff] [blame]	21	<li><a href="#style">Coding Style</a>
				22	<li><a href="#submitting">Submitting Patches</a>
				23	<li><a href="#release">Making a New Mesa Release</a>
				24	<li><a href="#extensions">Adding Extensions</a>
Brian Paul	5183061	2004-08-17 14:08:59 +0000	[diff] [blame]	25	</ul>
Brian Paul	0b27ace	2003-03-08 17:38:57 +0000	[diff] [blame]	26
				27
Brian Paul	98f2f47	2015-05-25 09:13:09 -0600	[diff] [blame]	28	<h2 id="style">Coding Style</h2>
Brian Paul	0b27ace	2003-03-08 17:38:57 +0000	[diff] [blame]	29
				30	<p>
Brian Paul	c6184f8	2015-05-25 10:18:35 -0600	[diff] [blame]	31	Mesa is over 20 years old and the coding style has evolved over time.
				32	Some old parts use a style that's a bit out of date.
				33	If the guidelines below don't cover something, try following the format of
				34	existing, neighboring code.
Brian Paul	0b27ace	2003-03-08 17:38:57 +0000	[diff] [blame]	35	</p>
				36
				37	<p>
Brian Paul	c6184f8	2015-05-25 10:18:35 -0600	[diff] [blame]	38	Basic formatting guidelines
Brian Paul	0b27ace	2003-03-08 17:38:57 +0000	[diff] [blame]	39	</p>
				40
Brian Paul	c6184f8	2015-05-25 10:18:35 -0600	[diff] [blame]	41	<ul>
				42	<li>3-space indentation, no tabs.
				43	<li>Limit lines to 78 or fewer characters. The idea is to prevent line
				44	wrapping in 80-column editors and terminals. There are exceptions, such
				45	as if you're defining a large, static table of information.
				46	<li>Opening braces go on the same line as the if/for/while statement.
				47	For example:
Brian Paul	0b27ace	2003-03-08 17:38:57 +0000	[diff] [blame]	48	<pre>
Brian Paul	c6184f8	2015-05-25 10:18:35 -0600	[diff] [blame]	49	if (condition) {
				50	foo;
				51	} else {
				52	bar;
				53	}
Brian Paul	0b27ace	2003-03-08 17:38:57 +0000	[diff] [blame]	54	</pre>
				55
Brian Paul	c6184f8	2015-05-25 10:18:35 -0600	[diff] [blame]	56	<li>Put a space before/after operators. For example, <tt>a = b + c;</tt>
				57	and not <tt>a=b+c;</tt>
				58
				59	<li>This GNU indent command generally does the right thing for formatting:
Brian Paul	0b27ace	2003-03-08 17:38:57 +0000	[diff] [blame]	60	<pre>
Brian Paul	c6184f8	2015-05-25 10:18:35 -0600	[diff] [blame]	61	indent -br -i3 -npcs --no-tabs infile.c -o outfile.c
Brian Paul	0b27ace	2003-03-08 17:38:57 +0000	[diff] [blame]	62	</pre>
				63
Brian Paul	c6184f8	2015-05-25 10:18:35 -0600	[diff] [blame]	64	<li>Use comments wherever you think it would be helpful for other developers.
				65	Several specific cases and style examples follow. Note that we roughly
				66	follow <a href="http://www.stack.nl/~dimitri/doxygen/">Doxygen</a> conventions.
				67	<br>
				68	<br>
				69	Single-line comments:
Brian Paul	0b27ace	2003-03-08 17:38:57 +0000	[diff] [blame]	70	<pre>
Brian Paul	c6184f8	2015-05-25 10:18:35 -0600	[diff] [blame]	71	/* null-out pointer to prevent dangling reference below */
				72	bufferObj = NULL;
				73	</pre>
				74	Or,
				75	<pre>
				76	bufferObj = NULL; /* prevent dangling reference below */
				77	</pre>
				78	Multi-line comment:
				79	<pre>
				80	/* If this is a new buffer object id, or one which was generated but
				81	* never used before, allocate a buffer object now.
				82	*/
				83	</pre>
				84	We try to quote the OpenGL specification where prudent:
				85	<pre>
				86	/* Page 38 of the PDF of the OpenGL ES 3.0 spec says:
				87	*
				88	* "An INVALID_OPERATION error is generated for any of the following
				89	* conditions:
				90	*
				91	* * <length> is zero."
				92	*
				93	* Additionally, page 94 of the PDF of the OpenGL 4.5 core spec
				94	* (30.10.2014) also says this, so it's no longer allowed for desktop GL,
				95	* either.
				96	*/
				97	</pre>
				98	Function comment example:
				99	<pre>
				100	/**
				101	* Create and initialize a new buffer object. Called via the
				102	* ctx->Driver.CreateObject() driver callback function.
				103	* \param name integer name of the object
				104	* \param type one of GL_FOO, GL_BAR, etc.
				105	* \return pointer to new object or NULL if error
				106	*/
				107	struct gl_object *
				108	_mesa_create_object(GLuint name, GLenum type)
				109	{
				110	/* function body */
				111	}
Brian Paul	0b27ace	2003-03-08 17:38:57 +0000	[diff] [blame]	112	</pre>
				113
Brian Paul	c6184f8	2015-05-25 10:18:35 -0600	[diff] [blame]	114	<li>Put the function return type and qualifiers on one line and the function
				115	name and parameters on the next, as seen above. This makes it easy to use
				116	<code>grep ^function_name dir/*</code> to find function definitions. Also,
				117	the opening brace goes on the next line by itself (see above.)
				118
				119	<li>Function names follow various conventions depending on the type of function:
				120	<pre>
				121	glFooBar() - a public GL entry point (in glapi_dispatch.c)
				122	_mesa_FooBar() - the internal immediate mode function
				123	save_FooBar() - retained mode (display list) function in dlist.c
				124	foo_bar() - a static (private) function
				125	_mesa_foo_bar() - an internal non-static Mesa function
				126	</pre>
				127
				128	<li>Constants, macros and enumerant names are ALL_UPPERCASE, with _ between
				129	words.
				130	<li>Mesa usually uses camel case for local variables (Ex: "localVarname")
				131	while gallium typically uses underscores (Ex: "local_var_name").
				132	<li>Global variables are almost never used because Mesa should be thread-safe.
				133
				134	<li>Booleans. Places that are not directly visible to the GL API
				135	should prefer the use of <tt>bool</tt>, <tt>true</tt>, and
Kai Wasserbäch	dbec3a5	2011-08-23 10:48:58 +0200	[diff] [blame]	136	<tt>false</tt> over <tt>GLboolean</tt>, <tt>GL_TRUE</tt>, and
				137	<tt>GL_FALSE</tt>. In C code, this may mean that
Kai Wasserbäch	e106d4c	2011-08-27 17:51:47 +0200	[diff] [blame]	138	<tt>#include <stdbool.h></tt> needs to be added. The
Kai Wasserbäch	dbec3a5	2011-08-23 10:48:58 +0200	[diff] [blame]	139	<tt>try_emit_</tt>* methods in src/mesa/program/ir_to_mesa.cpp and
Kai Wasserbäch	e106d4c	2011-08-27 17:51:47 +0200	[diff] [blame]	140	src/mesa/state_tracker/st_glsl_to_tgsi.cpp can serve as examples.
Brian Paul	c6184f8	2015-05-25 10:18:35 -0600	[diff] [blame]	141
				142	</ul>
Kai Wasserbäch	dbec3a5	2011-08-23 10:48:58 +0200	[diff] [blame]	143
Brian Paul	98f2f47	2015-05-25 09:13:09 -0600	[diff] [blame]	144
				145	<h2 id="submitting">Submitting patches</h2>
Timothy Arceri	2382011	2013-09-05 02:54:00 -0600	[diff] [blame]	146
				147	<p>
Brian Paul	d959885	2015-05-25 09:42:04 -0600	[diff] [blame]	148	The basic guidelines for submitting patches are:
				149	</p>
				150
				151	<ul>
				152	<li>Patches should be sufficiently tested before submitting.
				153	<li>Code patches should follow Mesa coding conventions.
				154	<li>Whenever possible, patches should only effect individual Mesa/Gallium
				155	components.
				156	<li>Patches should never introduce build breaks and should be bisectable (see
				157	<code>git bisect</code>.)
				158	<li>Patches should be properly formatted (see below).
				159	<li>Patches should be submitted to mesa-dev for review using
				160	<code>git send-email</code>.
				161	<li>Patches should not mix code changes with code formatting changes (except,
				162	perhaps, in very trivial cases.)
				163	</ul>
				164
				165	<h3>Patch formatting</h3>
				166
				167	<p>
				168	The basic rules for patch formatting are:
				169	</p>
				170
				171	<ul>
				172	<li>Lines should be limited to 75 characters or less so that git logs
				173	displayed in 80-column terminals avoid line wrapping. Note that git
				174	log uses 4 spaces of indentation (4 + 75 < 80).
				175	<li>The first line should be a short, concise summary of the change prefixed
				176	with a module name. Examples:
				177	<pre>
				178	mesa: Add support for querying GL_VERTEX_ATTRIB_ARRAY_LONG
				179
				180	gallium: add PIPE_CAP_DEVICE_RESET_STATUS_QUERY
				181
				182	i965: Fix missing type in local variable declaration.
				183	</pre>
				184	<li>Subsequent patch comments should describe the change in more detail,
				185	if needed. For example:
				186	<pre>
				187	i965: Remove end-of-thread SEND alignment code.
				188
				189	This was present in Eric's initial implementation of the compaction code
				190	for Sandybridge (commit 077d01b6). There is no documentation saying this
				191	is necessary, and removing it causes no regressions in piglit on any
				192	platform.
				193	</pre>
				194	<li>A "Signed-off-by:" line is not required, but not discouraged either.
				195	<li>If a patch address a bugzilla issue, that should be noted in the
				196	patch comment. For example:
				197	<pre>
				198	Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89689
				199	</pre>
				200	<li>If there have been several revisions to a patch during the review
				201	process, they should be noted such as in this example:
				202	<pre>
				203	st/mesa: add ARB_texture_stencil8 support (v4)
				204
				205	if we support stencil texturing, enable texture_stencil8
				206	there is no requirement to support native S8 for this,
				207	the texture can be converted to x24s8 fine.
				208
				209	v2: fold fixes from Marek in:
				210	a) put S8 last in the list
				211	b) fix renderable to always test for d/s renderable
				212	fixup the texture case to use a stencil only format
				213	for picking the format for the texture view.
				214	v3: hit fallback for getteximage
				215	v4: put s8 back in front, it shouldn't get picked now (Ilia)
				216	</pre>
				217	<li>If someone tested your patch, document it with a line like this:
				218	<pre>
				219	Tested-by: Joe Hacker <jhacker@foo.com>
				220	</pre>
				221	<li>If the patch was reviewed (usually the case) or acked by someone,
				222	that should be documented with:
				223	<pre>
				224	Reviewed-by: Joe Hacker <jhacker@foo.com>
				225	Acked-by: Joe Hacker <jhacker@foo.com>
				226	</pre>
				227	</ul>
				228
				229
				230
				231	<h3>Testing Patches</h3>
				232
				233	<p>
				234	It should go without saying that patches must be tested. In general,
				235	do whatever testing is prudent.
				236	</p>
				237
				238	<p>
				239	You should always run the Mesa test suite before submitting patches.
				240	The test suite can be run using the 'make check' command. All tests
Timothy Arceri	2382011	2013-09-05 02:54:00 -0600	[diff] [blame]	241	must pass before patches will be accepted, this may mean you have
				242	to update the tests themselves.
				243	</p>
				244
				245	<p>
Brian Paul	d959885	2015-05-25 09:42:04 -0600	[diff] [blame]	246	Whenever possible and applicable, test the patch with
Timothy Arceri	2ce2b80	2015-06-19 13:03:36 +1000	[diff] [blame^]	247	<a href="http://piglit.freedesktop.org">Piglit</a> to
Brian Paul	d959885	2015-05-25 09:42:04 -0600	[diff] [blame]	248	check for regressions.
				249	</p>
				250
				251
				252	<h3>Mailing Patches</h3>
				253
				254	<p>
Timothy Arceri	2382011	2013-09-05 02:54:00 -0600	[diff] [blame]	255	Patches should be sent to the Mesa mailing list for review.
				256	When submitting a patch make sure to use git send-email rather than attaching
				257	patches to emails. Sending patches as attachments prevents people from being
				258	able to provide in-line review comments.
				259	</p>
				260
				261	<p>
				262	When submitting follow-up patches you can use --in-reply-to to make v2, v3,
				263	etc patches show up as replies to the originals. This usually works well
				264	when you're sending out updates to individual patches (as opposed to
				265	re-sending the whole series). Using --in-reply-to makes
				266	it harder for reviewers to accidentally review old patches.
				267	</p>
Brian Paul	0b27ace	2003-03-08 17:38:57 +0000	[diff] [blame]	268
Timothy Arceri	2ce2b80	2015-06-19 13:03:36 +1000	[diff] [blame^]	269	<p>
				270	When submitting follow-up patches you should also login to
				271	<a href="https://patchwork.freedesktop.org">patchwork</a> and change the
				272	state of your old patches to Superseded.
				273	</p>
				274
Brian Paul	2ab0ca3	2015-05-26 11:30:22 -0600	[diff] [blame]	275	<h3>Reviewing Patches</h3>
				276
				277	<p>
				278	When you've reviewed a patch on the mailing list, please be unambiguous
				279	about your review. That is, state either
				280	<pre>
				281	Reviewed-by: Joe Hacker <jhacker@foo.com>
				282	</pre>
				283	or
				284	<pre>
				285	Acked-by: Joe Hacker <jhacker@foo.com>
				286	</pre>
				287	Rather than saying just "LGTM" or "Seems OK".
				288	</p>
				289
				290	<p>
				291	If small changes are suggested, it's OK to say something like:
				292	<pre>
				293	With the above fixes, Reviewed-by: Joe Hacker <jhacker@foo.com>
				294	</pre>
				295	which tells the patch author that the patch can be committed, as long
				296	as the issues are resolved first.
				297	</p>
				298
				299
Brian Paul	98f2f47	2015-05-25 09:13:09 -0600	[diff] [blame]	300	<h3>Marking a commit as a candidate for a stable branch</h3>
Andreas Boll	f07784d	2012-10-02 13:37:34 +0200	[diff] [blame]	301
				302	<p>
				303	If you want a commit to be applied to a stable branch,
				304	you should add an appropriate note to the commit message.
				305	</p>
				306
				307	<p>
				308	Here are some examples of such a note:
				309	</p>
				310	<ul>
Carl Worth	d6c8365	2013-12-12 23:07:26 -0800	[diff] [blame]	311	<li>CC: <mesa-stable@lists.freedesktop.org></li>
				312	<li>CC: "9.2 10.0" <mesa-stable@lists.freedesktop.org></li>
				313	<li>CC: "10.0" <mesa-stable@lists.freedesktop.org></li>
Andreas Boll	f07784d	2012-10-02 13:37:34 +0200	[diff] [blame]	314	</ul>
				315
Carl Worth	d6c8365	2013-12-12 23:07:26 -0800	[diff] [blame]	316	Simply adding the CC to the mesa-stable list address is adequate to nominate
				317	the commit for the most-recently-created stable branch. It is only necessary
				318	to specify a specific branch name, (such as "9.2 10.0" or "10.0" in the
				319	examples above), if you want to nominate the commit for an older stable
				320	branch. And, as in these examples, you can nominate the commit for the older
				321	branch in addition to the more recent branch, or nominate the commit
				322	exclusively for the older branch.
				323
				324	This "CC" syntax for patch nomination will cause patches to automatically be
				325	copied to the mesa-stable@ mailing list when you use "git send-email" to send
				326	patches to the mesa-dev@ mailing list. Also, if you realize that a commit
Nathan Kidd	0691b37	2014-01-03 16:44:00 -0700	[diff] [blame]	327	should be nominated for the stable branch after it has already been committed,
Carl Worth	d6c8365	2013-12-12 23:07:26 -0800	[diff] [blame]	328	you can send a note directly to the mesa-stable@lists.freedesktop.org where
				329	the Mesa stable-branch maintainers will receive it. Be sure to mention the
				330	commit ID of the commit of interest (as it appears in the mesa master branch).
Andreas Boll	1f38fb2	2012-10-02 13:55:53 +0200	[diff] [blame]	331
Carl Worth	4546b70	2014-04-30 16:27:03 -0700	[diff] [blame]	332	The latest set of patches that have been nominated, accepted, or rejected for
				333	the upcoming stable release can always be seen on the
Carl Worth	399b4e2	2014-08-21 09:46:57 -0700	[diff] [blame]	334	<a href="http://cworth.org/~cworth/mesa-stable-queue/">Mesa Stable Queue</a>
Carl Worth	4546b70	2014-04-30 16:27:03 -0700	[diff] [blame]	335	page.
				336
Brian Paul	98f2f47	2015-05-25 09:13:09 -0600	[diff] [blame]	337	<h3>Criteria for accepting patches to the stable branch</h3>
Andreas Boll	1f38fb2	2012-10-02 13:55:53 +0200	[diff] [blame]	338
Carl Worth	399b4e2	2014-08-21 09:46:57 -0700	[diff] [blame]	339	Mesa has a designated release manager for each stable branch, and the release
				340	manager is the only developer that should be pushing changes to these
				341	branches. Everyone else should simply nominate patches using the mechanism
				342	described above.
				343
				344	The stable-release manager will work with the list of nominated patches, and
				345	for each patch that meets the crtieria below will cherry-pick the patch with:
				346	<code>git cherry-pick -x <commit></code>. The <code>-x</code> option is
				347	important so that the picked patch references the comit ID of the original
				348	patch.
				349
				350	The stable-release manager may at times need to force-push changes to the
				351	stable branches, for example, to drop a previously-picked patch that was later
				352	identified as causing a regression). These force-pushes may cause changes to
				353	be lost from the stable branch if developers push things directly. Consider
				354	yourself warned.
				355
				356	The stable-release manager is also given broad discretion in rejecting patches
				357	that have been nominated for the stable branch. The most basic rule is that
				358	the stable branch is for bug fixes only, (no new features, no
				359	regressions). Here is a non-exhaustive list of some reasons that a patch may
				360	be rejected:
				361
				362	<ul>
				363	<li>Patch introduces a regression. Any reported build breakage or other
				364	regression caused by a particular patch, (game no longer work, piglit test
				365	changes from PASS to FAIL), is justification for rejecting a patch.</li>
				366
				367	<li>Patch is too large, (say, larger than 100 lines)</li>
				368
				369	<li>Patch is not a fix. For example, a commit that moves code around with no
				370	functional change should be rejected.</li>
				371
				372	<li>Patch fix is not clearly described. For example, a commit message
				373	of only a single line, no description of the bug, no mention of bugzilla,
				374	etc.</li>
				375
				376	<li>Patch has not obviously been reviewed, For example, the commit message
				377	has no Reviewed-by, Signed-off-by, nor Tested-by tags from anyone but the
				378	author.</li>
				379
				380	<li>Patch has not already been merged to the master branch. As a rule, bug
				381	fixes should never be applied first to a stable branch. Patches should land
				382	first on the master branch and then be cherry-picked to a stable
				383	branch. (This is to avoid future releases causing regressions if the patch
				384	is not also applied to master.) The only things that might look like
				385	exceptions would be backports of patches from master that happen to look
				386	significantly different.</li>
				387
				388	<li>Patch depends on too many other patches. Ideally, all stable-branch
				389	patches should be self-contained. It sometimes occurs that a single, logical
				390	bug-fix occurs as two separate patches on master, (such as an original
				391	patch, then a subsequent fix-up to that patch). In such a case, these two
				392	patches should be squashed into a single, self-contained patch for the
				393	stable branch. (Of course, if the squashing makes the patch too large, then
				394	that could be a reason to reject the patch.)</li>
				395
				396	<li>Patch includes new feature development, not bug fixes. New OpenGL
				397	features, extensions, etc. should be applied to Mesa master and included in
				398	the next major release. Stable releases are intended only for bug fixes.
				399
				400	Note: As an exception to this rule, the stable-release manager may accept
				401	hardware-enabling "features". For example, backports of new code to support
				402	a newly-developed hardware product can be accepted if they can be reasonably
				403	determined to not have effects on other hardware.</li>
				404
				405	<li>Patch is a performance optimization. As a rule, performance patches are
				406	not candidates for the stable branch. The only exception might be a case
				407	where an application's performance was recently severely impacted so as to
				408	become unusable. The fix for this performance regression could then be
				409	considered for a stable branch. The optimization must also be
				410	non-controversial and the patches still need to meet the other criteria of
				411	being simple and self-contained</li>
				412
				413	<li>Patch introduces a new failure mode (such as an assert). While the new
				414	assert might technically be correct, for example to make Mesa more
				415	conformant, this is not the kind of "bug fix" we want in a stable
				416	release. The potential problem here is that an OpenGL program that was
				417	previously working, (even if technically non-compliant with the
				418	specification), could stop working after this patch. So that would be a
				419	regression that is unaacceptable for the stable branch.</li>
				420	</ul>
Andreas Boll	1f38fb2	2012-10-02 13:55:53 +0200	[diff] [blame]	421
Brian Paul	98f2f47	2015-05-25 09:13:09 -0600	[diff] [blame]	422
				423	<h2 id="release">Making a New Mesa Release</h2>
Brian Paul	0b27ace	2003-03-08 17:38:57 +0000	[diff] [blame]	424
				425	<p>
				426	These are the instructions for making a new Mesa release.
				427	</p>
				428
Andreas Boll	210a27d	2012-06-12 09:05:36 +0200	[diff] [blame]	429	<h3>Get latest source files</h3>
Brian Paul	0b27ace	2003-03-08 17:38:57 +0000	[diff] [blame]	430	<p>
Brian Paul	84c5e48	2009-06-23 19:21:04 -0600	[diff] [blame]	431	Use git to get the latest Mesa files from the git repository, from whatever
Carl Worth	619505a	2014-08-21 10:44:35 -0700	[diff] [blame]	432	branch is relevant. This document uses the convention X.Y.Z for the release
				433	being created, which should be created from a branch named X.Y.
Brian Paul	0b27ace	2003-03-08 17:38:57 +0000	[diff] [blame]	434	</p>
				435
Carl Worth	619505a	2014-08-21 10:44:35 -0700	[diff] [blame]	436	<h3>Perform basic testing</h3>
Brian Paul	65b7905	2004-11-22 17:49:15 +0000	[diff] [blame]	437	<p>
Carl Worth	619505a	2014-08-21 10:44:35 -0700	[diff] [blame]	438	The release manager should, at the very least, test the code by compiling it,
				439	installing it, and running the latest piglit to ensure that no piglit tests
				440	have regressed since the previous release.
Brian Paul	65b7905	2004-11-22 17:49:15 +0000	[diff] [blame]	441	</p>
				442
				443	<p>
Carl Worth	619505a	2014-08-21 10:44:35 -0700	[diff] [blame]	444	The release manager should do this testing with at least one hardware driver,
				445	(say, whatever is contained in the local development machine), as well as on
				446	both Gallium and non-Gallium software drivers. The software testing can be
				447	performed by running piglit with the following environment-variable set:
Andreas Boll	b347bb5	2012-06-25 21:53:06 +0200	[diff] [blame]	448	</p>
				449
Brian Paul	0b27ace	2003-03-08 17:38:57 +0000	[diff] [blame]	450	<pre>
Carl Worth	619505a	2014-08-21 10:44:35 -0700	[diff] [blame]	451	LIBGL_ALWAYS_SOFTWARE=1
				452	</pre>
				453
				454	And Gallium vs. non-Gallium software drivers can be obtained by using the
				455	following configure flags on separate builds:
				456
				457	<pre>
				458	--with-dri-drivers=swrast
				459	--with-gallium-drivers=swrast
Brian Paul	0b27ace	2003-03-08 17:38:57 +0000	[diff] [blame]	460	</pre>
				461
				462	<p>
Carl Worth	619505a	2014-08-21 10:44:35 -0700	[diff] [blame]	463	Note: If both options are given in one build, both swrast_dri.so drivers will
				464	be compiled, but only one will be installed. The following command can be used
				465	to ensure the correct driver is being tested:
				466	</p>
				467
				468	<pre>
				469	LIBGL_ALWAYS_SOFTWARE=1 glxinfo \| grep "renderer string"
				470	</pre>
				471
				472	If any regressions are found in this testing with piglit, stop here, and do
				473	not perform a release until regressions are fixed.
				474
				475	<h3>Update version in file VERSION</h3>
				476
				477	<p>
				478	Increment the version contained in the file VERSION at Mesa's top-level, then
				479	commit this change.
				480	</p>
				481
				482	<h3>Create release notes for the new release</h3>
				483
				484	<p>
				485	Create a new file docs/relnotes/X.Y.Z.html, (follow the style of the previous
				486	release notes). Note that the sha256sums section of the release notes should
				487	be empty at this point.
Brian Paul	65b7905	2004-11-22 17:49:15 +0000	[diff] [blame]	488	</p>
				489
				490	<p>
Carl Worth	619505a	2014-08-21 10:44:35 -0700	[diff] [blame]	491	Two scripts are available to help generate portions of the release notes:
Brian Paul	0b27ace	2003-03-08 17:38:57 +0000	[diff] [blame]	492
Carl Worth	619505a	2014-08-21 10:44:35 -0700	[diff] [blame]	493	<pre>
				494	./bin/bugzilla_mesa.sh
				495	./bin/shortlog_mesa.sh
				496	</pre>
				497
Brian Paul	0b27ace	2003-03-08 17:38:57 +0000	[diff] [blame]	498	<p>
Carl Worth	619505a	2014-08-21 10:44:35 -0700	[diff] [blame]	499	The first script identifies commits that reference bugzilla bugs and obtains
				500	the descriptions of those bugs from bugzilla. The second script generates a
				501	log of all commits. In both cases, HTML-formatted lists are printed to stdout
				502	to be included in the release notes.
Brian Paul	0b27ace	2003-03-08 17:38:57 +0000	[diff] [blame]	503	</p>
				504
				505	<p>
Carl Worth	619505a	2014-08-21 10:44:35 -0700	[diff] [blame]	506	Commit these changes
				507	</p>
				508
				509	<h3>Make the release archives, signatures, and the release tag</h3>
				510	<p>
				511	From inside the Mesa directory:
				512	<pre>
				513	./autogen.sh
				514	make -j1 tarballs
				515	</pre>
				516
				517	<p>
				518	After the tarballs are created, the sha256 checksums for the files will
				519	be computed and printed. These will be used in a step below.
				520	</p>
				521
				522	<p>
				523	It's important at this point to also verify that the constructed tar file
				524	actually builds:
				525	</p>
				526
				527	<pre>
				528	tar xjf MesaLib-X.Y.Z.tar.bz2
				529	cd Mesa-X.Y.Z
				530	./configure --enable-gallium-llvm
				531	make -j6
				532	make install
				533	</pre>
				534
				535	<p>
				536	Some touch testing should also be performed at this point, (run glxgears or
				537	more involved OpenGL programs against the installed Mesa).
				538	</p>
				539
				540	<p>
				541	Create detached GPG signatures for each of the archive files created above:
				542	</p>
				543
				544	<pre>
				545	gpg --sign --detach MesaLib-X.Y.Z.tar.gz
				546	gpg --sign --detach MesaLib-X.Y.Z.tar.bz2
				547	gpg --sign --detach MesaLib-X.Y.Z.zip
				548	</pre>
				549
				550	<p>
				551	Tag the commit used for the build:
				552	</p>
				553
				554	<pre>
				555	git tag -s mesa-X.Y.X -m "Mesa X.Y.Z release"
				556	</pre>
				557
				558	<p>
				559	Note: It would be nice to investigate and fix the issue that causes the
				560	tarballs target to fail with multiple build process, such as with "-j4". It
				561	would also be nice to incorporate all of the above commands into a single
				562	makefile target. And instead of a custom "tarballs" target, we should
				563	incorporate things into the standard "make dist" and "make distcheck" targets.
				564	</p>
				565
				566	<h3>Add the sha256sums to the release notes</h3>
				567
				568	<p>
				569	Edit docs/relnotes/X.Y.Z.html to add the sha256sums printed as part of "make
				570	tarballs" in the previous step. Commit this change.
				571	</p>
				572
Thomas Helland	8d813d1	2015-05-26 12:14:00 -0600	[diff] [blame]	573	<h3>Push all commits and the tag created above</h3>
Carl Worth	619505a	2014-08-21 10:44:35 -0700	[diff] [blame]	574
				575	<p>
				576	This is the first step that cannot easily be undone. The release is going
				577	forward from this point:
				578	</p>
				579
				580	<pre>
				581	git push origin X.Y --tags
				582	</pre>
				583
				584	<h3>Install the release files and signatures on the distribution server</h3>
				585
				586	<p>
				587	The following commands can be used to copy the release archive files and
				588	signatures to the freedesktop.org server:
				589	</p>
				590
				591	<pre>
				592	scp MesaLib-X.Y.Z* people.freedesktop.org:
				593	ssh people.freedesktop.org
				594	cd /srv/ftp.freedesktop.org/pub/mesa
				595	mkdir X.Y.Z
				596	cd X.Y.Z
				597	mv ~/MesaLib-X.Y.Z* .
				598	</pre>
				599
Thomas Helland	8d813d1	2015-05-26 12:14:00 -0600	[diff] [blame]	600	<h3>Back on mesa master, add the new release notes into the tree</h3>
Carl Worth	619505a	2014-08-21 10:44:35 -0700	[diff] [blame]	601
				602	<p>
				603	Something like the following steps will do the trick:
				604	</p>
				605
				606	<pre>
				607	cp docs/relnotes/X.Y.Z.html /tmp
				608	git checkout master
				609	cp /tmp/X.Y.Z.html docs/relnotes
				610	git add docs/relnotes/X.Y.Z.html
				611	</pre>
				612
				613	<p>
				614	Also, edit docs/relnotes.html to add a link to the new release notes, and edit
				615	docs/index.html to add a news entry. Then commit and push:
				616	</p>
				617
				618	<pre>
				619	git commit -a -m "docs: Import X.Y.Z release notes, add news item."
				620	git push origin
				621	</pre>
				622
				623	<h3>Update the mesa3d.org website</h3>
				624
				625	<p>
				626	NOTE: The recent release managers have not been performing this step
				627	themselves, but leaving this to Brian Paul, (who has access to the
				628	sourceforge.net hosting for mesa3d.org). Brian is more than willing to grant
				629	the permission necessary to future release managers to do this step on their
				630	own.
Brian Paul	84c5e48	2009-06-23 19:21:04 -0600	[diff] [blame]	631	</p>
				632
				633	<p>
Brian Paul	65b7905	2004-11-22 17:49:15 +0000	[diff] [blame]	634	Update the web site by copying the docs/ directory's files to
Brian Paul	84c5e48	2009-06-23 19:21:04 -0600	[diff] [blame]	635	/home/users/b/br/brianp/mesa-www/htdocs/ with:
				636	<br>
				637	<code>
				638	sftp USERNAME,mesa3d@web.sourceforge.net
				639	</code>
Brian Paul	0b27ace	2003-03-08 17:38:57 +0000	[diff] [blame]	640	</p>
				641
Carl Worth	619505a	2014-08-21 10:44:35 -0700	[diff] [blame]	642
				643	<h3>Announce the release</h3>
Brian Paul	0b27ace	2003-03-08 17:38:57 +0000	[diff] [blame]	644	<p>
Brian Paul	efe5671	2003-03-19 19:15:28 +0000	[diff] [blame]	645	Make an announcement on the mailing lists:
Ian Romanick	8f32c64	2010-06-16 14:28:08 -0700	[diff] [blame]	646
Kenneth Graunke	7d24d1b	2013-07-25 11:42:38 -0700	[diff] [blame]	647	<em>mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org</em>,
Brian Paul	efe5671	2003-03-19 19:15:28 +0000	[diff] [blame]	648	and
Kenneth Graunke	7d24d1b	2013-07-25 11:42:38 -0700	[diff] [blame]	649	<em>mesa-announce@lists.freedesktop.org</em>
Carl Worth	619505a	2014-08-21 10:44:35 -0700	[diff] [blame]	650
				651	Follow the template of previously-sent release announcements. The following
				652	command can be used to generate the log of changes to be included in the
				653	release announcement:
				654
				655	<pre>
				656	git shortlog mesa-X.Y.Z-1..mesa-X.Y.Z
				657	</pre>
Brian Paul	0b27ace	2003-03-08 17:38:57 +0000	[diff] [blame]	658	</p>
				659
Brian Paul	98f2f47	2015-05-25 09:13:09 -0600	[diff] [blame]	660
				661	<h2 id="extensions">Adding Extensions</h2>
				662
				663	<p>
				664	To add a new GL extension to Mesa you have to do at least the following.
				665
				666	<ul>
				667	<li>
				668	If glext.h doesn't define the extension, edit include/GL/gl.h and add
				669	code like this:
				670	<pre>
				671	#ifndef GL_EXT_the_extension_name
				672	#define GL_EXT_the_extension_name 1
				673	/* declare the new enum tokens */
				674	/* prototype the new functions */
				675	/* TYPEDEFS for the new functions */
				676	#endif
				677	</pre>
				678	</li>
				679	<li>
				680	In the src/mapi/glapi/gen/ directory, add the new extension functions and
				681	enums to the gl_API.xml file.
				682	Then, a bunch of source files must be regenerated by executing the
				683	corresponding Python scripts.
				684	</li>
				685	<li>
				686	Add a new entry to the <code>gl_extensions</code> struct in mtypes.h
				687	</li>
				688	<li>
				689	Update the <code>extensions.c</code> file.
				690	</li>
				691	<li>
				692	From this point, the best way to proceed is to find another extension,
				693	similar to the new one, that's already implemented in Mesa and use it
				694	as an example.
				695	</li>
				696	<li>
				697	If the new extension adds new GL state, the functions in get.c, enable.c
				698	and attrib.c will most likely require new code.
				699	</li>
				700	<li>
				701	The dispatch tests check_table.cpp and dispatch_sanity.cpp
				702	should be updated with details about the new extensions functions. These
				703	tests are run using 'make check'
				704	</li>
				705	</ul>
				706
				707
				708
				709
Andreas Boll	b5da52a	2012-09-18 18:57:02 +0200	[diff] [blame]	710	</div>
Brian Paul	0b27ace	2003-03-08 17:38:57 +0000	[diff] [blame]	711	</body>
				712	</html>