blob: edd19b8fa466e7f27017a8fee6ae53c1a7a02dae [file] [log] [blame]
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +00001
2/*--------------------------------------------------------------------*/
njn1d0825f2006-03-27 11:37:07 +00003/*--- The leak checker. mc_leakcheck.c ---*/
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +00004/*--------------------------------------------------------------------*/
5
6/*
nethercote137bc552003-11-14 17:47:54 +00007 This file is part of MemCheck, a heavyweight Valgrind tool for
njn1d0825f2006-03-27 11:37:07 +00008 detecting memory errors.
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +00009
sewardjec062e82011-10-23 07:32:08 +000010 Copyright (C) 2000-2011 Julian Seward
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +000011 jseward@acm.org
12
13 This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
14 modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
15 published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the
16 License, or (at your option) any later version.
17
18 This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but
19 WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
20 MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
21 General Public License for more details.
22
23 You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
24 along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
25 Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA
26 02111-1307, USA.
27
28 The GNU General Public License is contained in the file COPYING.
29*/
30
njnc7561b92005-06-19 01:24:32 +000031#include "pub_tool_basics.h"
sewardj4cfea4f2006-10-14 19:26:10 +000032#include "pub_tool_vki.h"
njnac1e0332009-05-08 00:39:31 +000033#include "pub_tool_aspacehl.h"
njn4802b382005-06-11 04:58:29 +000034#include "pub_tool_aspacemgr.h"
njn1d0825f2006-03-27 11:37:07 +000035#include "pub_tool_execontext.h"
36#include "pub_tool_hashtable.h"
njn97405b22005-06-02 03:39:33 +000037#include "pub_tool_libcbase.h"
njn132bfcc2005-06-04 19:16:06 +000038#include "pub_tool_libcassert.h"
njn36a20fa2005-06-03 03:08:39 +000039#include "pub_tool_libcprint.h"
njnde62cbf2005-06-10 22:08:14 +000040#include "pub_tool_libcsignal.h"
njn6ace3ea2005-06-17 03:06:27 +000041#include "pub_tool_machine.h"
njnc7561b92005-06-19 01:24:32 +000042#include "pub_tool_mallocfree.h"
43#include "pub_tool_options.h"
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +000044#include "pub_tool_oset.h"
philippe6643e962012-01-17 21:16:30 +000045#include "pub_tool_poolalloc.h"
46#include "pub_tool_signals.h" // Needed for mc_include.h
sewardj6c591e12011-04-11 16:17:51 +000047#include "pub_tool_libcsetjmp.h" // setjmp facilities
njn1d0825f2006-03-27 11:37:07 +000048#include "pub_tool_tooliface.h" // Needed for mc_include.h
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +000049
njn1d0825f2006-03-27 11:37:07 +000050#include "mc_include.h"
njnc7561b92005-06-19 01:24:32 +000051
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +000052/*------------------------------------------------------------*/
53/*--- An overview of leak checking. ---*/
54/*------------------------------------------------------------*/
njnc7561b92005-06-19 01:24:32 +000055
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +000056// Leak-checking is a directed-graph traversal problem. The graph has
57// two kinds of nodes:
58// - root-set nodes:
59// - GP registers of all threads;
60// - valid, aligned, pointer-sized data words in valid client memory,
61// including stacks, but excluding words within client heap-allocated
62// blocks (they are excluded so that later on we can differentiate
63// between heap blocks that are indirectly leaked vs. directly leaked).
64// - heap-allocated blocks. A block is a mempool chunk or a malloc chunk
65// that doesn't contain a mempool chunk. Nb: the terms "blocks" and
66// "chunks" are used interchangeably below.
67//
68// There are two kinds of edges:
69// - start-pointers, i.e. pointers to the start of a block;
70// - interior-pointers, i.e. pointers to the interior of a block.
71//
72// We use "pointers" rather than "edges" below.
73//
74// Root set nodes only point to blocks. Blocks only point to blocks;
75// a block can point to itself.
76//
77// The aim is to traverse the graph and determine the status of each block.
78//
79// There are 9 distinct cases. See memcheck/docs/mc-manual.xml for details.
80// Presenting all nine categories to the user is probably too much.
81// Currently we do this:
82// - definitely lost: case 3
83// - indirectly lost: case 4, 9
84// - possibly lost: cases 5..8
85// - still reachable: cases 1, 2
86//
87// It's far from clear that this is the best possible categorisation; it's
88// accreted over time without any central guiding principle.
89
90/*------------------------------------------------------------*/
91/*--- XXX: Thoughts for improvement. ---*/
92/*------------------------------------------------------------*/
93
94// From the user's point of view:
95// - If they aren't using interior-pointers, they just have to fix the
96// directly lost blocks, and the indirectly lost ones will be fixed as
97// part of that. Any possibly lost blocks will just be due to random
98// pointer garbage and can be ignored.
99//
100// - If they are using interior-pointers, the fact that they currently are not
101// being told which ones might be directly lost vs. indirectly lost makes
102// it hard to know where to begin.
103//
104// All this makes me wonder if new option is warranted:
105// --follow-interior-pointers. By default it would be off, the leak checker
106// wouldn't follow interior-pointers and there would only be 3 categories:
107// R, DL, IL.
108//
109// If turned on, then it would show 7 categories (R, DL, IL, DR/DL, IR/IL,
110// IR/IL/DL, IL/DL). That output is harder to understand but it's your own
111// damn fault for using interior-pointers...
112//
113// ----
114//
115// Also, why are two blank lines printed between each loss record?
njnc2f8b1b2009-08-10 06:47:00 +0000116// [bug 197930]
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000117//
118// ----
119//
120// Also, --show-reachable is a bad name because it also turns on the showing
121// of indirectly leaked blocks(!) It would be better named --show-all or
122// --show-all-heap-blocks, because that's the end result.
123//
124// ----
125//
126// Also, the VALGRIND_LEAK_CHECK and VALGRIND_QUICK_LEAK_CHECK aren't great
127// names. VALGRIND_FULL_LEAK_CHECK and VALGRIND_SUMMARY_LEAK_CHECK would be
128// better.
129//
130// ----
131//
132// Also, VALGRIND_COUNT_LEAKS and VALGRIND_COUNT_LEAK_BLOCKS aren't great as
133// they combine direct leaks and indirect leaks into one. New, more precise
134// ones (they'll need new names) would be good. If more categories are
135// used, as per the --follow-interior-pointers option, they should be
136// updated accordingly. And they should use a struct to return the values.
137//
138// ----
139//
140// Also, for this case:
141//
142// (4) p4 BBB ---> AAA
143//
144// BBB is definitely directly lost. AAA is definitely indirectly lost.
145// Here's the relevant loss records printed for a full check (each block is
146// 16 bytes):
147//
148// ==20397== 16 bytes in 1 blocks are indirectly lost in loss record 9 of 15
149// ==20397== at 0x4C2694E: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:177)
150// ==20397== by 0x400521: mk (leak-cases.c:49)
151// ==20397== by 0x400578: main (leak-cases.c:72)
152//
153// ==20397== 32 (16 direct, 16 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely
154// lost in loss record 14 of 15
155// ==20397== at 0x4C2694E: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:177)
156// ==20397== by 0x400521: mk (leak-cases.c:49)
157// ==20397== by 0x400580: main (leak-cases.c:72)
158//
159// The first one is fine -- it describes AAA.
160//
161// The second one is for BBB. It's correct in that 16 bytes in 1 block are
162// directly lost. It's also correct that 16 are indirectly lost as a result,
163// but it means that AAA is being counted twice in the loss records. (It's
164// not, thankfully, counted twice in the summary counts). Argh.
165//
166// This would be less confusing for the second one:
167//
168// ==20397== 16 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 14
169// of 15 (and 16 bytes in 1 block are indirectly lost as a result; they
170// are mentioned elsewhere (if --show-reachable=yes is given!))
171// ==20397== at 0x4C2694E: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:177)
172// ==20397== by 0x400521: mk (leak-cases.c:49)
173// ==20397== by 0x400580: main (leak-cases.c:72)
174//
175// But ideally we'd present the loss record for the directly lost block and
176// then the resultant indirectly lost blocks and make it clear the
177// dependence. Double argh.
178
179/*------------------------------------------------------------*/
180/*--- The actual algorithm. ---*/
181/*------------------------------------------------------------*/
182
183// - Find all the blocks (a.k.a. chunks) to check. Mempool chunks require
184// some special treatment because they can be within malloc'd blocks.
185// - Scan every word in the root set (GP registers and valid
186// non-heap memory words).
187// - First, we skip if it doesn't point to valid memory.
188// - Then, we see if it points to the start or interior of a block. If
189// so, we push the block onto the mark stack and mark it as having been
190// reached.
191// - Then, we process the mark stack, repeating the scanning for each block;
192// this can push more blocks onto the mark stack. We repeat until the
193// mark stack is empty. Each block is marked as definitely or possibly
194// reachable, depending on whether interior-pointers were required to
195// reach it.
196// - At this point we know for every block if it's reachable or not.
197// - We then push each unreached block onto the mark stack, using the block
198// number as the "clique" number.
199// - We process the mark stack again, this time grouping blocks into cliques
200// in order to facilitate the directly/indirectly lost categorisation.
201// - We group blocks by their ExeContexts and categorisation, and print them
202// if --leak-check=full. We also print summary numbers.
203//
204// A note on "cliques":
205// - A directly lost block is one with no pointers to it. An indirectly
206// lost block is one that is pointed to by a directly or indirectly lost
207// block.
208// - Each directly lost block has zero or more indirectly lost blocks
209// hanging off it. All these blocks together form a "clique". The
210// directly lost block is called the "clique leader". The clique number
211// is the number (in lc_chunks[]) of the clique leader.
212// - Actually, a directly lost block may be pointed to if it's part of a
213// cycle. In that case, there may be more than one choice for the clique
214// leader, and the choice is arbitrary. Eg. if you have A-->B and B-->A
215// either A or B could be the clique leader.
216// - Cliques cannot overlap, and will be truncated to avoid this. Eg. if we
217// have A-->C and B-->C, the two cliques will be {A,C} and {B}, or {A} and
218// {B,C} (again the choice is arbitrary). This is because we don't want
219// to count a block as indirectly lost more than once.
220//
221// A note on 'is_prior_definite':
222// - This is a boolean used in various places that indicates if the chain
223// up to the prior node (prior to the one being considered) is definite.
224// - In the clique == -1 case:
225// - if True it means that the prior node is a root-set node, or that the
226// prior node is a block which is reachable from the root-set via
227// start-pointers.
228// - if False it means that the prior node is a block that is only
229// reachable from the root-set via a path including at least one
230// interior-pointer.
231// - In the clique != -1 case, currently it's always True because we treat
232// start-pointers and interior-pointers the same for direct/indirect leak
233// checking. If we added a PossibleIndirectLeak state then this would
234// change.
235
236
237// Define to debug the memory-leak-detector.
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000238#define VG_DEBUG_LEAKCHECK 0
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000239#define VG_DEBUG_CLIQUE 0
240
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000241
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +0000242/*------------------------------------------------------------*/
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000243/*--- Getting the initial chunks, and searching them. ---*/
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +0000244/*------------------------------------------------------------*/
245
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000246// Compare the MC_Chunks by 'data' (i.e. the address of the block).
247static Int compare_MC_Chunks(void* n1, void* n2)
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +0000248{
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000249 MC_Chunk* mc1 = *(MC_Chunk**)n1;
250 MC_Chunk* mc2 = *(MC_Chunk**)n2;
251 if (mc1->data < mc2->data) return -1;
252 if (mc1->data > mc2->data) return 1;
253 return 0;
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +0000254}
255
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000256#if VG_DEBUG_LEAKCHECK
257// Used to sanity-check the fast binary-search mechanism.
258static
259Int find_chunk_for_OLD ( Addr ptr,
260 MC_Chunk** chunks,
261 Int n_chunks )
262
263{
264 Int i;
265 Addr a_lo, a_hi;
266 PROF_EVENT(70, "find_chunk_for_OLD");
267 for (i = 0; i < n_chunks; i++) {
268 PROF_EVENT(71, "find_chunk_for_OLD(loop)");
269 a_lo = chunks[i]->data;
270 a_hi = ((Addr)chunks[i]->data) + chunks[i]->szB;
271 if (a_lo <= ptr && ptr < a_hi)
272 return i;
273 }
274 return -1;
275}
276#endif
277
278// Find the i such that ptr points at or inside the block described by
279// chunks[i]. Return -1 if none found. This assumes that chunks[]
280// has been sorted on the 'data' field.
281static
282Int find_chunk_for ( Addr ptr,
283 MC_Chunk** chunks,
284 Int n_chunks )
285{
286 Addr a_mid_lo, a_mid_hi;
287 Int lo, mid, hi, retVal;
288 // VG_(printf)("find chunk for %p = ", ptr);
289 retVal = -1;
290 lo = 0;
291 hi = n_chunks-1;
292 while (True) {
293 // Invariant: current unsearched space is from lo to hi, inclusive.
294 if (lo > hi) break; // not found
295
296 mid = (lo + hi) / 2;
297 a_mid_lo = chunks[mid]->data;
298 a_mid_hi = chunks[mid]->data + chunks[mid]->szB;
299 // Extent of block 'mid' is [a_mid_lo .. a_mid_hi).
300 // Special-case zero-sized blocks - treat them as if they had
301 // size 1. Not doing so causes them to not cover any address
302 // range at all and so will never be identified as the target of
303 // any pointer, which causes them to be incorrectly reported as
304 // definitely leaked.
305 if (chunks[mid]->szB == 0)
306 a_mid_hi++;
307
308 if (ptr < a_mid_lo) {
309 hi = mid-1;
310 continue;
311 }
312 if (ptr >= a_mid_hi) {
313 lo = mid+1;
314 continue;
315 }
316 tl_assert(ptr >= a_mid_lo && ptr < a_mid_hi);
317 retVal = mid;
318 break;
319 }
320
321# if VG_DEBUG_LEAKCHECK
322 tl_assert(retVal == find_chunk_for_OLD ( ptr, chunks, n_chunks ));
323# endif
324 // VG_(printf)("%d\n", retVal);
325 return retVal;
326}
327
328
329static MC_Chunk**
330find_active_chunks(UInt* pn_chunks)
331{
332 // Our goal is to construct a set of chunks that includes every
333 // mempool chunk, and every malloc region that *doesn't* contain a
334 // mempool chunk.
335 MC_Mempool *mp;
336 MC_Chunk **mallocs, **chunks, *mc;
337 UInt n_mallocs, n_chunks, m, s;
338 Bool *malloc_chunk_holds_a_pool_chunk;
339
340 // First we collect all the malloc chunks into an array and sort it.
341 // We do this because we want to query the chunks by interior
342 // pointers, requiring binary search.
343 mallocs = (MC_Chunk**) VG_(HT_to_array)( MC_(malloc_list), &n_mallocs );
344 if (n_mallocs == 0) {
345 tl_assert(mallocs == NULL);
346 *pn_chunks = 0;
347 return NULL;
348 }
349 VG_(ssort)(mallocs, n_mallocs, sizeof(VgHashNode*), compare_MC_Chunks);
350
351 // Then we build an array containing a Bool for each malloc chunk,
352 // indicating whether it contains any mempools.
353 malloc_chunk_holds_a_pool_chunk = VG_(calloc)( "mc.fas.1",
354 n_mallocs, sizeof(Bool) );
355 n_chunks = n_mallocs;
356
357 // Then we loop over the mempool tables. For each chunk in each
358 // pool, we set the entry in the Bool array corresponding to the
359 // malloc chunk containing the mempool chunk.
360 VG_(HT_ResetIter)(MC_(mempool_list));
361 while ( (mp = VG_(HT_Next)(MC_(mempool_list))) ) {
362 VG_(HT_ResetIter)(mp->chunks);
363 while ( (mc = VG_(HT_Next)(mp->chunks)) ) {
364
365 // We'll need to record this chunk.
366 n_chunks++;
367
368 // Possibly invalidate the malloc holding the beginning of this chunk.
369 m = find_chunk_for(mc->data, mallocs, n_mallocs);
370 if (m != -1 && malloc_chunk_holds_a_pool_chunk[m] == False) {
371 tl_assert(n_chunks > 0);
372 n_chunks--;
373 malloc_chunk_holds_a_pool_chunk[m] = True;
374 }
375
376 // Possibly invalidate the malloc holding the end of this chunk.
377 if (mc->szB > 1) {
378 m = find_chunk_for(mc->data + (mc->szB - 1), mallocs, n_mallocs);
379 if (m != -1 && malloc_chunk_holds_a_pool_chunk[m] == False) {
380 tl_assert(n_chunks > 0);
381 n_chunks--;
382 malloc_chunk_holds_a_pool_chunk[m] = True;
383 }
384 }
385 }
386 }
387 tl_assert(n_chunks > 0);
388
389 // Create final chunk array.
390 chunks = VG_(malloc)("mc.fas.2", sizeof(VgHashNode*) * (n_chunks));
391 s = 0;
392
393 // Copy the mempool chunks and the non-marked malloc chunks into a
394 // combined array of chunks.
395 VG_(HT_ResetIter)(MC_(mempool_list));
396 while ( (mp = VG_(HT_Next)(MC_(mempool_list))) ) {
397 VG_(HT_ResetIter)(mp->chunks);
398 while ( (mc = VG_(HT_Next)(mp->chunks)) ) {
399 tl_assert(s < n_chunks);
400 chunks[s++] = mc;
401 }
402 }
403 for (m = 0; m < n_mallocs; ++m) {
404 if (!malloc_chunk_holds_a_pool_chunk[m]) {
405 tl_assert(s < n_chunks);
406 chunks[s++] = mallocs[m];
407 }
408 }
409 tl_assert(s == n_chunks);
410
411 // Free temporaries.
412 VG_(free)(mallocs);
413 VG_(free)(malloc_chunk_holds_a_pool_chunk);
414
415 *pn_chunks = n_chunks;
416
417 return chunks;
418}
419
420/*------------------------------------------------------------*/
421/*--- The leak detector proper. ---*/
422/*------------------------------------------------------------*/
423
424// Holds extra info about each block during leak checking.
425typedef
426 struct {
427 UInt state:2; // Reachedness.
tom1d0f3f62010-10-04 20:55:21 +0000428 UInt pending:1; // Scan pending.
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +0000429 union {
430 SizeT indirect_szB : (sizeof(SizeT)*8)-3; // If Unreached, how many bytes
431 // are unreachable from here.
432 SizeT clique : (sizeof(SizeT)*8)-3; // if IndirectLeak, clique leader
433 // to which it belongs.
434 } IorC;
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000435 }
436 LC_Extra;
437
438// An array holding pointers to every chunk we're checking. Sorted by address.
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +0000439// lc_chunks is initialised during leak search. It is kept after leak search
440// to support printing the list of blocks belonging to a loss record.
441// lc_chunk array can only be used validly till the next "free" operation
442// (as a free operation potentially destroys one or more chunks).
443// To detect lc_chunk is valid, we store the nr of frees operations done
444// when lc_chunk was build : lc_chunks (and lc_extras) stays valid as
445// long as no free operations has been done since lc_chunks building.
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000446static MC_Chunk** lc_chunks;
447// How many chunks we're dealing with.
448static Int lc_n_chunks;
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +0000449static SizeT lc_chunks_n_frees_marker;
450// This has the same number of entries as lc_chunks, and each entry
451// in lc_chunks corresponds with the entry here (ie. lc_chunks[i] and
452// lc_extras[i] describe the same block).
453static LC_Extra* lc_extras;
454
sewardjc8bd1df2011-06-26 12:41:33 +0000455// chunks will be converted and merged in loss record, maintained in lr_table
456// lr_table elements are kept from one leak_search to another to implement
457// the "print new/changed leaks" client request
458static OSet* lr_table;
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +0000459// Array of sorted loss record (produced during last leak search).
460static LossRecord** lr_array;
461
sewardjc8bd1df2011-06-26 12:41:33 +0000462
463// DeltaMode used the last time we called detect_memory_leaks.
464// The recorded leak errors must be output using a logic based on this delta_mode.
465// The below avoids replicating the delta_mode in each LossRecord.
466LeakCheckDeltaMode MC_(detect_memory_leaks_last_delta_mode);
467
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000468
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000469// Records chunks that are currently being processed. Each element in the
470// stack is an index into lc_chunks and lc_extras. Its size is
471// 'lc_n_chunks' because in the worst case that's how many chunks could be
472// pushed onto it (actually I think the maximum is lc_n_chunks-1 but let's
473// be conservative).
474static Int* lc_markstack;
475// The index of the top element of the stack; -1 if the stack is empty, 0 if
476// the stack has one element, 1 if it has two, etc.
477static Int lc_markstack_top;
478
479// Keeps track of how many bytes of memory we've scanned, for printing.
480// (Nb: We don't keep track of how many register bytes we've scanned.)
481static SizeT lc_scanned_szB;
482
483
484SizeT MC_(bytes_leaked) = 0;
485SizeT MC_(bytes_indirect) = 0;
486SizeT MC_(bytes_dubious) = 0;
487SizeT MC_(bytes_reachable) = 0;
488SizeT MC_(bytes_suppressed) = 0;
489
490SizeT MC_(blocks_leaked) = 0;
491SizeT MC_(blocks_indirect) = 0;
492SizeT MC_(blocks_dubious) = 0;
493SizeT MC_(blocks_reachable) = 0;
494SizeT MC_(blocks_suppressed) = 0;
495
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000496// Determines if a pointer is to a chunk. Returns the chunk number et al
497// via call-by-reference.
498static Bool
499lc_is_a_chunk_ptr(Addr ptr, Int* pch_no, MC_Chunk** pch, LC_Extra** pex)
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +0000500{
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000501 Int ch_no;
502 MC_Chunk* ch;
503 LC_Extra* ex;
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +0000504
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000505 // Quick filter.
506 if (!VG_(am_is_valid_for_client)(ptr, 1, VKI_PROT_READ)) {
507 return False;
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000508 } else {
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000509 ch_no = find_chunk_for(ptr, lc_chunks, lc_n_chunks);
510 tl_assert(ch_no >= -1 && ch_no < lc_n_chunks);
511
512 if (ch_no == -1) {
513 return False;
514 } else {
515 // Ok, we've found a pointer to a chunk. Get the MC_Chunk and its
516 // LC_Extra.
517 ch = lc_chunks[ch_no];
518 ex = &(lc_extras[ch_no]);
519
520 tl_assert(ptr >= ch->data);
521 tl_assert(ptr < ch->data + ch->szB + (ch->szB==0 ? 1 : 0));
522
523 if (VG_DEBUG_LEAKCHECK)
524 VG_(printf)("ptr=%#lx -> block %d\n", ptr, ch_no);
525
526 *pch_no = ch_no;
527 *pch = ch;
528 *pex = ex;
529
530 return True;
531 }
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000532 }
533}
534
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000535// Push a chunk (well, just its index) onto the mark stack.
536static void lc_push(Int ch_no, MC_Chunk* ch)
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000537{
tom1d0f3f62010-10-04 20:55:21 +0000538 if (!lc_extras[ch_no].pending) {
539 if (0) {
540 VG_(printf)("pushing %#lx-%#lx\n", ch->data, ch->data + ch->szB);
541 }
542 lc_markstack_top++;
543 tl_assert(lc_markstack_top < lc_n_chunks);
544 lc_markstack[lc_markstack_top] = ch_no;
545 tl_assert(!lc_extras[ch_no].pending);
546 lc_extras[ch_no].pending = True;
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000547 }
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000548}
549
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000550// Return the index of the chunk on the top of the mark stack, or -1 if
551// there isn't one.
552static Bool lc_pop(Int* ret)
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000553{
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000554 if (-1 == lc_markstack_top) {
555 return False;
556 } else {
557 tl_assert(0 <= lc_markstack_top && lc_markstack_top < lc_n_chunks);
558 *ret = lc_markstack[lc_markstack_top];
559 lc_markstack_top--;
tom1d0f3f62010-10-04 20:55:21 +0000560 tl_assert(lc_extras[*ret].pending);
561 lc_extras[*ret].pending = False;
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000562 return True;
563 }
564}
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000565
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000566
567// If 'ptr' is pointing to a heap-allocated block which hasn't been seen
568// before, push it onto the mark stack.
569static void
570lc_push_without_clique_if_a_chunk_ptr(Addr ptr, Bool is_prior_definite)
571{
572 Int ch_no;
573 MC_Chunk* ch;
574 LC_Extra* ex;
575
576 if ( ! lc_is_a_chunk_ptr(ptr, &ch_no, &ch, &ex) )
577 return;
tom1d0f3f62010-10-04 20:55:21 +0000578
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000579 // Possibly upgrade the state, ie. one of:
580 // - Unreached --> Possible
581 // - Unreached --> Reachable
582 // - Possible --> Reachable
tom1d0f3f62010-10-04 20:55:21 +0000583 if (ptr == ch->data && is_prior_definite && ex->state != Reachable) {
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000584 // 'ptr' points to the start of the block, and the prior node is
585 // definite, which means that this block is definitely reachable.
586 ex->state = Reachable;
587
tom1d0f3f62010-10-04 20:55:21 +0000588 // State has changed to Reachable so (re)scan the block to make
589 // sure any blocks it points to are correctly marked.
590 lc_push(ch_no, ch);
591
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000592 } else if (ex->state == Unreached) {
593 // Either 'ptr' is a interior-pointer, or the prior node isn't definite,
594 // which means that we can only mark this block as possibly reachable.
595 ex->state = Possible;
tom1d0f3f62010-10-04 20:55:21 +0000596
597 // State has changed to Possible so (re)scan the block to make
598 // sure any blocks it points to are correctly marked.
599 lc_push(ch_no, ch);
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000600 }
601}
602
603static void
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +0000604lc_push_if_a_chunk_ptr_register(ThreadId tid, HChar* regname, Addr ptr)
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000605{
606 lc_push_without_clique_if_a_chunk_ptr(ptr, /*is_prior_definite*/True);
607}
608
609// If ptr is pointing to a heap-allocated block which hasn't been seen
610// before, push it onto the mark stack. Clique is the index of the
611// clique leader.
612static void
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +0000613lc_push_with_clique_if_a_chunk_ptr(Addr ptr, Int clique, Int cur_clique)
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000614{
615 Int ch_no;
616 MC_Chunk* ch;
617 LC_Extra* ex;
618
619 tl_assert(0 <= clique && clique < lc_n_chunks);
620
621 if ( ! lc_is_a_chunk_ptr(ptr, &ch_no, &ch, &ex) )
622 return;
623
624 // If it's not Unreached, it's already been handled so ignore it.
625 // If ch_no==clique, it's the clique leader, which means this is a cyclic
626 // structure; again ignore it because it's already been handled.
627 if (ex->state == Unreached && ch_no != clique) {
628 // Note that, unlike reachable blocks, we currently don't distinguish
629 // between start-pointers and interior-pointers here. We probably
630 // should, though.
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000631 lc_push(ch_no, ch);
632
633 // Add the block to the clique, and add its size to the
634 // clique-leader's indirect size. Also, if the new block was
635 // itself a clique leader, it isn't any more, so add its
636 // indirect_szB to the new clique leader.
637 if (VG_DEBUG_CLIQUE) {
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +0000638 if (ex->IorC.indirect_szB > 0)
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000639 VG_(printf)(" clique %d joining clique %d adding %lu+%lu\n",
bartdc429d12011-07-29 14:24:07 +0000640 ch_no, clique, (unsigned long)ch->szB,
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +0000641 (unsigned long)ex->IorC.indirect_szB);
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000642 else
643 VG_(printf)(" block %d joining clique %d adding %lu\n",
bartdc429d12011-07-29 14:24:07 +0000644 ch_no, clique, (unsigned long)ch->szB);
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000645 }
646
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +0000647 lc_extras[clique].IorC.indirect_szB += ch->szB;
648 lc_extras[clique].IorC.indirect_szB += ex->IorC.indirect_szB;
649 ex->state = IndirectLeak;
650 ex->IorC.clique = (SizeT) cur_clique;
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000651 }
652}
653
654static void
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +0000655lc_push_if_a_chunk_ptr(Addr ptr, Int clique, Int cur_clique, Bool is_prior_definite)
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000656{
657 if (-1 == clique)
658 lc_push_without_clique_if_a_chunk_ptr(ptr, is_prior_definite);
659 else
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +0000660 lc_push_with_clique_if_a_chunk_ptr(ptr, clique, cur_clique);
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000661}
662
sewardj45d94cc2005-04-20 14:44:11 +0000663
sewardj97d3ebb2011-04-11 18:36:34 +0000664static VG_MINIMAL_JMP_BUF(memscan_jmpbuf);
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000665
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000666static
667void scan_all_valid_memory_catcher ( Int sigNo, Addr addr )
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000668{
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000669 if (0)
670 VG_(printf)("OUCH! sig=%d addr=%#lx\n", sigNo, addr);
671 if (sigNo == VKI_SIGSEGV || sigNo == VKI_SIGBUS)
sewardj6c591e12011-04-11 16:17:51 +0000672 VG_MINIMAL_LONGJMP(memscan_jmpbuf);
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000673}
674
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +0000675// lc_scan_memory has 2 modes:
676//
677// 1. Leak check mode (searched == 0).
678// -----------------------------------
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000679// Scan a block of memory between [start, start+len). This range may
680// be bogus, inaccessable, or otherwise strange; we deal with it. For each
681// valid aligned word we assume it's a pointer to a chunk a push the chunk
682// onto the mark stack if so.
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +0000683// clique is the "highest level clique" in which indirectly leaked blocks have
684// to be collected. cur_clique is the current "lower" level clique through which
685// the memory to be scanned has been found.
686// Example: in the below tree if A is leaked, the top level clique will
687// be A, while lower level cliques will be B and C.
688/*
689 A
690 / \
691 B C
692 / \ / \
693 D E F G
694*/
695// Proper handling of top and lowest level clique allows block_list of a loss
696// record to describe the hierarchy of indirectly leaked blocks.
697//
698// 2. Search ptr mode (searched != 0).
699// -----------------------------------
700// In this mode, searches for pointers to a specific address range
701// In such a case, lc_scan_memory just scans [start..start+len[ for pointers to searched
702// and outputs the places where searched is found. It does not recursively scans the
703// found memory.
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000704static void
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +0000705lc_scan_memory(Addr start, SizeT len, Bool is_prior_definite, Int clique, Int cur_clique,
706 Addr searched, SizeT szB)
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000707{
708 Addr ptr = VG_ROUNDUP(start, sizeof(Addr));
njn13bfd852005-06-02 03:52:53 +0000709 Addr end = VG_ROUNDDN(start+len, sizeof(Addr));
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000710 vki_sigset_t sigmask;
711
712 if (VG_DEBUG_LEAKCHECK)
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000713 VG_(printf)("scan %#lx-%#lx (%lu)\n", start, end, len);
714
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000715 VG_(sigprocmask)(VKI_SIG_SETMASK, NULL, &sigmask);
njn695c16e2005-03-27 03:40:28 +0000716 VG_(set_fault_catcher)(scan_all_valid_memory_catcher);
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000717
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000718 // We might be in the middle of a page. Do a cheap check to see if
719 // it's valid; if not, skip onto the next page.
sewardj45f4e7c2005-09-27 19:20:21 +0000720 if (!VG_(am_is_valid_for_client)(ptr, sizeof(Addr), VKI_PROT_READ))
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000721 ptr = VG_PGROUNDUP(ptr+1); // First page is bad - skip it.
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000722
sewardj05fe85e2005-04-27 22:46:36 +0000723 while (ptr < end) {
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000724 Addr addr;
725
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000726 // Skip invalid chunks.
727 if ( ! MC_(is_within_valid_secondary)(ptr) ) {
728 ptr = VG_ROUNDUP(ptr+1, SM_SIZE);
729 continue;
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000730 }
731
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000732 // Look to see if this page seems reasonable.
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000733 if ((ptr % VKI_PAGE_SIZE) == 0) {
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000734 if (!VG_(am_is_valid_for_client)(ptr, sizeof(Addr), VKI_PROT_READ)) {
735 ptr += VKI_PAGE_SIZE; // Bad page - skip it.
736 continue;
737 }
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000738 }
739
sewardj6c591e12011-04-11 16:17:51 +0000740 if (VG_MINIMAL_SETJMP(memscan_jmpbuf) == 0) {
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000741 if ( MC_(is_valid_aligned_word)(ptr) ) {
742 lc_scanned_szB += sizeof(Addr);
743 addr = *(Addr *)ptr;
744 // If we get here, the scanned word is in valid memory. Now
745 // let's see if its contents point to a chunk.
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +0000746 if (searched) {
747 if (addr >= searched && addr < searched + szB) {
748 if (addr == searched)
749 VG_(umsg)("*%#lx points at %#lx\n", ptr, searched);
750 else
751 VG_(umsg)("*%#lx interior points at %lu bytes inside %#lx\n",
752 ptr, (long unsigned) addr - searched, searched);
753 MC_(pp_describe_addr) (ptr);
754 }
755 } else {
756 lc_push_if_a_chunk_ptr(addr, clique, cur_clique, is_prior_definite);
757 }
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000758 } else if (0 && VG_DEBUG_LEAKCHECK) {
759 VG_(printf)("%#lx not valid\n", ptr);
760 }
761 ptr += sizeof(Addr);
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000762 } else {
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000763 // We need to restore the signal mask, because we were
764 // longjmped out of a signal handler.
765 VG_(sigprocmask)(VKI_SIG_SETMASK, &sigmask, NULL);
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000766
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000767 ptr = VG_PGROUNDUP(ptr+1); // Bad page - skip it.
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000768 }
769 }
770
771 VG_(sigprocmask)(VKI_SIG_SETMASK, &sigmask, NULL);
772 VG_(set_fault_catcher)(NULL);
773}
774
sewardj45d94cc2005-04-20 14:44:11 +0000775
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000776// Process the mark stack until empty.
777static void lc_process_markstack(Int clique)
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000778{
njne3675d62009-05-19 02:08:25 +0000779 Int top = -1; // shut gcc up
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000780 Bool is_prior_definite;
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000781
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000782 while (lc_pop(&top)) {
tom1d0f3f62010-10-04 20:55:21 +0000783 tl_assert(top >= 0 && top < lc_n_chunks);
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000784
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000785 // See comment about 'is_prior_definite' at the top to understand this.
786 is_prior_definite = ( Possible != lc_extras[top].state );
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000787
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000788 lc_scan_memory(lc_chunks[top]->data, lc_chunks[top]->szB,
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +0000789 is_prior_definite, clique, (clique == -1 ? -1 : top),
790 /*searched*/ 0, 0);
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000791 }
792}
793
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +0000794static Word cmp_LossRecordKey_LossRecord(const void* key, const void* elem)
795{
796 LossRecordKey* a = (LossRecordKey*)key;
797 LossRecordKey* b = &(((LossRecord*)elem)->key);
798
799 // Compare on states first because that's fast.
800 if (a->state < b->state) return -1;
801 if (a->state > b->state) return 1;
802 // Ok, the states are equal. Now compare the locations, which is slower.
803 if (VG_(eq_ExeContext)(
804 MC_(clo_leak_resolution), a->allocated_at, b->allocated_at))
805 return 0;
806 // Different locations. Ordering is arbitrary, just use the ec pointer.
807 if (a->allocated_at < b->allocated_at) return -1;
808 if (a->allocated_at > b->allocated_at) return 1;
809 VG_(tool_panic)("bad LossRecord comparison");
810}
811
812static Int cmp_LossRecords(void* va, void* vb)
813{
814 LossRecord* lr_a = *(LossRecord**)va;
815 LossRecord* lr_b = *(LossRecord**)vb;
816 SizeT total_szB_a = lr_a->szB + lr_a->indirect_szB;
817 SizeT total_szB_b = lr_b->szB + lr_b->indirect_szB;
818
819 // First compare by sizes.
820 if (total_szB_a < total_szB_b) return -1;
821 if (total_szB_a > total_szB_b) return 1;
822 // If size are equal, compare by states.
823 if (lr_a->key.state < lr_b->key.state) return -1;
824 if (lr_a->key.state > lr_b->key.state) return 1;
njne10c7f82009-05-06 06:52:47 +0000825 // If they're still equal here, it doesn't matter that much, but we keep
826 // comparing other things so that regtests are as deterministic as
827 // possible. So: compare num_blocks.
828 if (lr_a->num_blocks < lr_b->num_blocks) return -1;
829 if (lr_a->num_blocks > lr_b->num_blocks) return 1;
830 // Finally, compare ExeContext addresses... older ones are likely to have
831 // lower addresses.
832 if (lr_a->key.allocated_at < lr_b->key.allocated_at) return -1;
833 if (lr_a->key.allocated_at > lr_b->key.allocated_at) return 1;
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +0000834 return 0;
835}
836
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +0000837// allocates or reallocates lr_array, and set its elements to the loss records
838// contains in lr_table.
839static Int get_lr_array_from_lr_table(void) {
840 Int i, n_lossrecords;
841 LossRecord* lr;
842
843 n_lossrecords = VG_(OSetGen_Size)(lr_table);
844
845 // (re-)create the array of pointers to the loss records.
846 // lr_array is kept to allow producing the block list from gdbserver.
847 if (lr_array != NULL)
848 VG_(free)(lr_array);
849 lr_array = VG_(malloc)("mc.pr.2", n_lossrecords * sizeof(LossRecord*));
850 i = 0;
851 VG_(OSetGen_ResetIter)(lr_table);
852 while ( (lr = VG_(OSetGen_Next)(lr_table)) ) {
853 lr_array[i++] = lr;
854 }
855 tl_assert(i == n_lossrecords);
856 return n_lossrecords;
857}
858
philippe84234902012-01-14 13:53:13 +0000859
860static void get_printing_rules(LeakCheckParams* lcp,
861 LossRecord* lr,
862 Bool* count_as_error,
863 Bool* print_record)
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000864{
philippe84234902012-01-14 13:53:13 +0000865 // Rules for printing:
866 // - We don't show suppressed loss records ever (and that's controlled
867 // within the error manager).
868 // - We show non-suppressed loss records that are not "reachable" if
869 // --leak-check=yes.
870 // - We show all non-suppressed loss records if --leak-check=yes and
871 // --show-reachable=yes.
872 //
873 // Nb: here "reachable" means Reachable *or* IndirectLeak; note that
874 // this is different to "still reachable" used elsewhere because it
875 // includes indirectly lost blocks!
876
877 Bool delta_considered;
878
879 switch (lcp->deltamode) {
880 case LCD_Any:
881 delta_considered = lr->num_blocks > 0;
882 break;
883 case LCD_Increased:
884 delta_considered
885 = lr->szB > lr->old_szB
886 || lr->indirect_szB > lr->old_indirect_szB
887 || lr->num_blocks > lr->old_num_blocks;
888 break;
889 case LCD_Changed:
890 delta_considered = lr->szB != lr->old_szB
891 || lr->indirect_szB != lr->old_indirect_szB
892 || lr->num_blocks != lr->old_num_blocks;
893 break;
894 default:
895 tl_assert(0);
896 }
897
898 *print_record = lcp->mode == LC_Full && delta_considered &&
899 ( lcp->show_reachable ||
900 Unreached == lr->key.state ||
901 ( lcp->show_possibly_lost &&
902 Possible == lr->key.state ) );
903 // We don't count a leaks as errors with lcp->mode==LC_Summary.
904 // Otherwise you can get high error counts with few or no error
905 // messages, which can be confusing. Also, you could argue that
906 // indirect leaks should be counted as errors, but it seems better to
907 // make the counting criteria similar to the printing criteria. So we
908 // don't count them.
909 *count_as_error = lcp->mode == LC_Full && delta_considered &&
910 ( Unreached == lr->key.state ||
911 Possible == lr->key.state );
912}
913
914static void print_results(ThreadId tid, LeakCheckParams* lcp)
915{
916 Int i, n_lossrecords, start_lr_output_scan;
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +0000917 LossRecord* lr;
918 Bool is_suppressed;
sewardjc8bd1df2011-06-26 12:41:33 +0000919 SizeT old_bytes_leaked = MC_(bytes_leaked); /* to report delta in summary */
920 SizeT old_bytes_indirect = MC_(bytes_indirect);
921 SizeT old_bytes_dubious = MC_(bytes_dubious);
922 SizeT old_bytes_reachable = MC_(bytes_reachable);
923 SizeT old_bytes_suppressed = MC_(bytes_suppressed);
924 SizeT old_blocks_leaked = MC_(blocks_leaked);
925 SizeT old_blocks_indirect = MC_(blocks_indirect);
926 SizeT old_blocks_dubious = MC_(blocks_dubious);
927 SizeT old_blocks_reachable = MC_(blocks_reachable);
928 SizeT old_blocks_suppressed = MC_(blocks_suppressed);
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000929
sewardjc8bd1df2011-06-26 12:41:33 +0000930 if (lr_table == NULL)
931 // Create the lr_table, which holds the loss records.
932 // If the lr_table already exists, it means it contains
933 // loss_records from the previous leak search. The old_*
934 // values in these records are used to implement the
935 // leak check delta mode
936 lr_table =
937 VG_(OSetGen_Create)(offsetof(LossRecord, key),
938 cmp_LossRecordKey_LossRecord,
939 VG_(malloc), "mc.pr.1",
940 VG_(free));
941
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +0000942 // If we have loss records from a previous search, reset values to have
943 // proper printing of the deltas between previous search and this search.
944 n_lossrecords = get_lr_array_from_lr_table();
945 for (i = 0; i < n_lossrecords; i++) {
philippe4bbfc5f2012-02-27 21:52:45 +0000946 if (lr_array[i]->num_blocks == 0) {
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +0000947 // remove from lr_table the old loss_records with 0 bytes found
948 VG_(OSetGen_Remove) (lr_table, &lr_array[i]->key);
philippe4bbfc5f2012-02-27 21:52:45 +0000949 VG_(OSetGen_FreeNode)(lr_table, lr_array[i]);
950 } else {
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +0000951 // move the leak sizes to old_* and zero the current sizes
952 // for next leak search
953 lr_array[i]->old_szB = lr_array[i]->szB;
954 lr_array[i]->old_indirect_szB = lr_array[i]->indirect_szB;
955 lr_array[i]->old_num_blocks = lr_array[i]->num_blocks;
956 lr_array[i]->szB = 0;
957 lr_array[i]->indirect_szB = 0;
958 lr_array[i]->num_blocks = 0;
959 }
960 }
961 // lr_array now contains "invalid" loss records => free it.
962 // lr_array will be re-created below with the kept and new loss records.
963 VG_(free) (lr_array);
964 lr_array = NULL;
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +0000965
966 // Convert the chunks into loss records, merging them where appropriate.
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000967 for (i = 0; i < lc_n_chunks; i++) {
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +0000968 MC_Chunk* ch = lc_chunks[i];
969 LC_Extra* ex = &(lc_extras)[i];
970 LossRecord* old_lr;
971 LossRecordKey lrkey;
972 lrkey.state = ex->state;
973 lrkey.allocated_at = ch->where;
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000974
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +0000975 old_lr = VG_(OSetGen_Lookup)(lr_table, &lrkey);
976 if (old_lr) {
977 // We found an existing loss record matching this chunk. Update the
978 // loss record's details in-situ. This is safe because we don't
979 // change the elements used as the OSet key.
980 old_lr->szB += ch->szB;
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +0000981 if (ex->state == Unreached)
982 old_lr->indirect_szB += ex->IorC.indirect_szB;
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +0000983 old_lr->num_blocks++;
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000984 } else {
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +0000985 // No existing loss record matches this chunk. Create a new loss
986 // record, initialise it from the chunk, and insert it into lr_table.
987 lr = VG_(OSetGen_AllocNode)(lr_table, sizeof(LossRecord));
988 lr->key = lrkey;
989 lr->szB = ch->szB;
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +0000990 if (ex->state == Unreached)
991 lr->indirect_szB = ex->IorC.indirect_szB;
992 else
993 lr->indirect_szB = 0;
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +0000994 lr->num_blocks = 1;
sewardjc8bd1df2011-06-26 12:41:33 +0000995 lr->old_szB = 0;
996 lr->old_indirect_szB = 0;
997 lr->old_num_blocks = 0;
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +0000998 VG_(OSetGen_Insert)(lr_table, lr);
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000999 }
1000 }
1001
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +00001002 // (re-)create the array of pointers to the (new) loss records.
1003 n_lossrecords = get_lr_array_from_lr_table ();
1004 tl_assert(VG_(OSetGen_Size)(lr_table) == n_lossrecords);
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +00001005
1006 // Sort the array by loss record sizes.
1007 VG_(ssort)(lr_array, n_lossrecords, sizeof(LossRecord*),
1008 cmp_LossRecords);
1009
1010 // Zero totals.
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001011 MC_(blocks_leaked) = MC_(bytes_leaked) = 0;
1012 MC_(blocks_indirect) = MC_(bytes_indirect) = 0;
1013 MC_(blocks_dubious) = MC_(bytes_dubious) = 0;
1014 MC_(blocks_reachable) = MC_(bytes_reachable) = 0;
1015 MC_(blocks_suppressed) = MC_(bytes_suppressed) = 0;
1016
philippe84234902012-01-14 13:53:13 +00001017 // If there is a maximum nr of loss records we can output, then first
1018 // compute from where the output scan has to start.
1019 // By default, start from the first loss record. Compute a higher
1020 // value if there is a maximum to respect. We need to print the last
1021 // records, as the one with the biggest sizes are more interesting.
1022 start_lr_output_scan = 0;
1023 if (lcp->mode == LC_Full && lcp->max_loss_records_output < n_lossrecords) {
1024 Int nr_printable_records = 0;
1025 for (i = n_lossrecords - 1; i >= 0 && start_lr_output_scan == 0; i--) {
1026 Bool count_as_error, print_record;
1027 lr = lr_array[i];
1028 get_printing_rules (lcp, lr, &count_as_error, &print_record);
1029 // Do not use get_printing_rules results for is_suppressed, as we
1030 // only want to check if the record would be suppressed.
1031 is_suppressed =
1032 MC_(record_leak_error) ( tid, i+1, n_lossrecords, lr,
1033 False /* print_record */,
1034 False /* count_as_error */);
1035 if (print_record && !is_suppressed) {
1036 nr_printable_records++;
1037 if (nr_printable_records == lcp->max_loss_records_output)
1038 start_lr_output_scan = i;
1039 }
sewardjc8bd1df2011-06-26 12:41:33 +00001040 }
philippe84234902012-01-14 13:53:13 +00001041 }
sewardjc8bd1df2011-06-26 12:41:33 +00001042
philippe84234902012-01-14 13:53:13 +00001043 // Print the loss records (in size order) and collect summary stats.
1044 for (i = start_lr_output_scan; i < n_lossrecords; i++) {
1045 Bool count_as_error, print_record;
1046 lr = lr_array[i];
1047 get_printing_rules(lcp, lr, &count_as_error, &print_record);
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +00001048 is_suppressed =
njn18afe5d2009-08-10 08:25:39 +00001049 MC_(record_leak_error) ( tid, i+1, n_lossrecords, lr, print_record,
1050 count_as_error );
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +00001051
1052 if (is_suppressed) {
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +00001053 MC_(blocks_suppressed) += lr->num_blocks;
1054 MC_(bytes_suppressed) += lr->szB;
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +00001055
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +00001056 } else if (Unreached == lr->key.state) {
1057 MC_(blocks_leaked) += lr->num_blocks;
1058 MC_(bytes_leaked) += lr->szB;
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +00001059
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +00001060 } else if (IndirectLeak == lr->key.state) {
1061 MC_(blocks_indirect) += lr->num_blocks;
1062 MC_(bytes_indirect) += lr->szB;
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +00001063
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +00001064 } else if (Possible == lr->key.state) {
1065 MC_(blocks_dubious) += lr->num_blocks;
1066 MC_(bytes_dubious) += lr->szB;
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +00001067
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +00001068 } else if (Reachable == lr->key.state) {
1069 MC_(blocks_reachable) += lr->num_blocks;
1070 MC_(bytes_reachable) += lr->szB;
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +00001071
1072 } else {
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001073 VG_(tool_panic)("unknown loss mode");
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +00001074 }
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +00001075 }
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +00001076
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001077 if (VG_(clo_verbosity) > 0 && !VG_(clo_xml)) {
sewardjc8bd1df2011-06-26 12:41:33 +00001078 char d_bytes[20];
1079 char d_blocks[20];
1080
sewardj6b523cd2009-07-15 14:49:40 +00001081 VG_(umsg)("LEAK SUMMARY:\n");
sewardjc8bd1df2011-06-26 12:41:33 +00001082 VG_(umsg)(" definitely lost: %'lu%s bytes in %'lu%s blocks\n",
1083 MC_(bytes_leaked),
philippe84234902012-01-14 13:53:13 +00001084 MC_(snprintf_delta) (d_bytes, 20, MC_(bytes_leaked), old_bytes_leaked, lcp->deltamode),
sewardjc8bd1df2011-06-26 12:41:33 +00001085 MC_(blocks_leaked),
philippe84234902012-01-14 13:53:13 +00001086 MC_(snprintf_delta) (d_blocks, 20, MC_(blocks_leaked), old_blocks_leaked, lcp->deltamode));
sewardjc8bd1df2011-06-26 12:41:33 +00001087 VG_(umsg)(" indirectly lost: %'lu%s bytes in %'lu%s blocks\n",
1088 MC_(bytes_indirect),
philippe84234902012-01-14 13:53:13 +00001089 MC_(snprintf_delta) (d_bytes, 20, MC_(bytes_indirect), old_bytes_indirect, lcp->deltamode),
sewardjc8bd1df2011-06-26 12:41:33 +00001090 MC_(blocks_indirect),
philippe84234902012-01-14 13:53:13 +00001091 MC_(snprintf_delta) (d_blocks, 20, MC_(blocks_indirect), old_blocks_indirect, lcp->deltamode) );
sewardjc8bd1df2011-06-26 12:41:33 +00001092 VG_(umsg)(" possibly lost: %'lu%s bytes in %'lu%s blocks\n",
1093 MC_(bytes_dubious),
philippe84234902012-01-14 13:53:13 +00001094 MC_(snprintf_delta) (d_bytes, 20, MC_(bytes_dubious), old_bytes_dubious, lcp->deltamode),
sewardjc8bd1df2011-06-26 12:41:33 +00001095 MC_(blocks_dubious),
philippe84234902012-01-14 13:53:13 +00001096 MC_(snprintf_delta) (d_blocks, 20, MC_(blocks_dubious), old_blocks_dubious, lcp->deltamode) );
sewardjc8bd1df2011-06-26 12:41:33 +00001097 VG_(umsg)(" still reachable: %'lu%s bytes in %'lu%s blocks\n",
1098 MC_(bytes_reachable),
philippe84234902012-01-14 13:53:13 +00001099 MC_(snprintf_delta) (d_bytes, 20, MC_(bytes_reachable), old_bytes_reachable, lcp->deltamode),
sewardjc8bd1df2011-06-26 12:41:33 +00001100 MC_(blocks_reachable),
philippe84234902012-01-14 13:53:13 +00001101 MC_(snprintf_delta) (d_blocks, 20, MC_(blocks_reachable), old_blocks_reachable, lcp->deltamode) );
sewardjc8bd1df2011-06-26 12:41:33 +00001102 VG_(umsg)(" suppressed: %'lu%s bytes in %'lu%s blocks\n",
1103 MC_(bytes_suppressed),
philippe84234902012-01-14 13:53:13 +00001104 MC_(snprintf_delta) (d_bytes, 20, MC_(bytes_suppressed), old_bytes_suppressed, lcp->deltamode),
sewardjc8bd1df2011-06-26 12:41:33 +00001105 MC_(blocks_suppressed),
philippe84234902012-01-14 13:53:13 +00001106 MC_(snprintf_delta) (d_blocks, 20, MC_(blocks_suppressed), old_blocks_suppressed, lcp->deltamode) );
1107 if (lcp->mode != LC_Full &&
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001108 (MC_(blocks_leaked) + MC_(blocks_indirect) +
1109 MC_(blocks_dubious) + MC_(blocks_reachable)) > 0) {
philippe84234902012-01-14 13:53:13 +00001110 if (lcp->requested_by_monitor_command)
sewardj30b3eca2011-06-28 08:20:39 +00001111 VG_(umsg)("To see details of leaked memory, give 'full' arg to leak_check\n");
sewardjc8bd1df2011-06-26 12:41:33 +00001112 else
1113 VG_(umsg)("Rerun with --leak-check=full to see details "
1114 "of leaked memory\n");
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001115 }
philippe84234902012-01-14 13:53:13 +00001116 if (lcp->mode == LC_Full &&
1117 MC_(blocks_reachable) > 0 && !lcp->show_reachable)
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001118 {
sewardj6b523cd2009-07-15 14:49:40 +00001119 VG_(umsg)("Reachable blocks (those to which a pointer "
1120 "was found) are not shown.\n");
philippe84234902012-01-14 13:53:13 +00001121 if (lcp->requested_by_monitor_command)
sewardj30b3eca2011-06-28 08:20:39 +00001122 VG_(umsg)("To see them, add 'reachable any' args to leak_check\n");
sewardjc8bd1df2011-06-26 12:41:33 +00001123 else
1124 VG_(umsg)("To see them, rerun with: --leak-check=full "
1125 "--show-reachable=yes\n");
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +00001126 }
njnb6267bd2009-08-12 00:14:16 +00001127 VG_(umsg)("\n");
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +00001128 }
1129}
1130
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +00001131// print recursively all indirectly leaked blocks collected in clique.
1132static void print_clique (Int clique, UInt level)
1133{
1134 Int ind;
1135 Int i, n_lossrecords;;
1136
1137 n_lossrecords = VG_(OSetGen_Size)(lr_table);
1138
1139 for (ind = 0; ind < lc_n_chunks; ind++) {
1140 LC_Extra* ind_ex = &(lc_extras)[ind];
1141 if (ind_ex->state == IndirectLeak && ind_ex->IorC.clique == (SizeT) clique) {
1142 MC_Chunk* ind_ch = lc_chunks[ind];
1143 LossRecord* ind_lr;
1144 LossRecordKey ind_lrkey;
1145 Int lr_i;
1146 ind_lrkey.state = ind_ex->state;
1147 ind_lrkey.allocated_at = ind_ch->where;
1148 ind_lr = VG_(OSetGen_Lookup)(lr_table, &ind_lrkey);
1149 for (lr_i = 0; lr_i < n_lossrecords; lr_i++)
1150 if (ind_lr == lr_array[lr_i])
1151 break;
1152 for (i = 0; i < level; i++)
1153 VG_(umsg)(" ");
1154 VG_(umsg)("%p[%lu] indirect loss record %d\n",
1155 (void *)ind_ch->data, (unsigned long)ind_ch->szB,
1156 lr_i+1); // lr_i+1 for user numbering.
1157 if (lr_i >= n_lossrecords)
1158 VG_(umsg)
1159 ("error: no indirect loss record found for %p[%lu]?????\n",
1160 (void *)ind_ch->data, (unsigned long)ind_ch->szB);
1161 print_clique(ind, level+1);
1162 }
1163 }
1164 }
1165
1166Bool MC_(print_block_list) ( UInt loss_record_nr)
1167{
1168 Int i, n_lossrecords;
1169 LossRecord* lr;
1170
1171 if (lr_table == NULL || lc_chunks == NULL || lc_extras == NULL) {
1172 VG_(umsg)("Can't print block list : no valid leak search result\n");
1173 return False;
1174 }
1175
1176 if (lc_chunks_n_frees_marker != MC_(get_cmalloc_n_frees)()) {
1177 VG_(umsg)("Can't print obsolete block list : redo a leak search first\n");
1178 return False;
1179 }
1180
1181 n_lossrecords = VG_(OSetGen_Size)(lr_table);
1182 if (loss_record_nr >= n_lossrecords)
1183 return False; // Invalid loss record nr.
1184
1185 tl_assert (lr_array);
1186 lr = lr_array[loss_record_nr];
1187
1188 // (re-)print the loss record details.
1189 // (+1 on loss_record_nr as user numbering for loss records starts at 1).
1190 MC_(pp_LossRecord)(loss_record_nr+1, n_lossrecords, lr);
1191
1192 // Match the chunks with loss records.
1193 for (i = 0; i < lc_n_chunks; i++) {
1194 MC_Chunk* ch = lc_chunks[i];
1195 LC_Extra* ex = &(lc_extras)[i];
1196 LossRecord* old_lr;
1197 LossRecordKey lrkey;
1198 lrkey.state = ex->state;
1199 lrkey.allocated_at = ch->where;
1200
1201 old_lr = VG_(OSetGen_Lookup)(lr_table, &lrkey);
1202 if (old_lr) {
1203 // We found an existing loss record matching this chunk.
1204 // If this is the loss record we are looking for, then output the pointer.
1205 if (old_lr == lr_array[loss_record_nr]) {
1206 VG_(umsg)("%p[%lu]\n",
1207 (void *)ch->data, (unsigned long) ch->szB);
1208 if (ex->state != Reachable) {
1209 // We can print the clique in all states, except Reachable.
1210 // In Unreached state, lc_chunk[i] is the clique leader.
1211 // In IndirectLeak, lc_chunk[i] might have been a clique leader
1212 // which was later collected in another clique.
1213 // For Possible, lc_chunk[i] might be the top of a clique
1214 // or an intermediate clique.
1215 print_clique(i, 1);
1216 }
1217 }
1218 } else {
1219 // No existing loss record matches this chunk ???
1220 VG_(umsg)("error: no loss record found for %p[%lu]?????\n",
1221 (void *)ch->data, (unsigned long) ch->szB);
1222 }
1223 }
1224 return True;
1225}
1226
1227// If searched = 0, scan memory root set, pushing onto the mark stack the blocks
1228// encountered.
1229// Otherwise (searched != 0), scan the memory root set searching for ptr pointing
1230// inside [searched, searched+szB[.
1231static void scan_memory_root_set(Addr searched, SizeT szB)
1232{
1233 Int i;
1234 Int n_seg_starts;
1235 Addr* seg_starts = VG_(get_segment_starts)( &n_seg_starts );
1236
1237 tl_assert(seg_starts && n_seg_starts > 0);
1238
1239 lc_scanned_szB = 0;
1240
1241 // VG_(am_show_nsegments)( 0, "leakcheck");
1242 for (i = 0; i < n_seg_starts; i++) {
1243 SizeT seg_size;
1244 NSegment const* seg = VG_(am_find_nsegment)( seg_starts[i] );
1245 tl_assert(seg);
1246
1247 if (seg->kind != SkFileC && seg->kind != SkAnonC) continue;
1248 if (!(seg->hasR && seg->hasW)) continue;
1249 if (seg->isCH) continue;
1250
1251 // Don't poke around in device segments as this may cause
1252 // hangs. Exclude /dev/zero just in case someone allocated
1253 // memory by explicitly mapping /dev/zero.
1254 if (seg->kind == SkFileC
1255 && (VKI_S_ISCHR(seg->mode) || VKI_S_ISBLK(seg->mode))) {
1256 HChar* dev_name = VG_(am_get_filename)( (NSegment*)seg );
1257 if (dev_name && 0 == VG_(strcmp)(dev_name, "/dev/zero")) {
1258 // Don't skip /dev/zero.
1259 } else {
1260 // Skip this device mapping.
1261 continue;
1262 }
1263 }
1264
1265 if (0)
1266 VG_(printf)("ACCEPT %2d %#lx %#lx\n", i, seg->start, seg->end);
1267
1268 // Scan the segment. We use -1 for the clique number, because this
1269 // is a root-set.
1270 seg_size = seg->end - seg->start + 1;
1271 if (VG_(clo_verbosity) > 2) {
1272 VG_(message)(Vg_DebugMsg,
1273 " Scanning root segment: %#lx..%#lx (%lu)\n",
1274 seg->start, seg->end, seg_size);
1275 }
1276 lc_scan_memory(seg->start, seg_size, /*is_prior_definite*/True,
1277 /*clique*/-1, /*cur_clique*/-1,
1278 searched, szB);
1279 }
philippe7d69fd92012-02-26 21:26:00 +00001280 VG_(free)(seg_starts);
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +00001281}
1282
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001283/*------------------------------------------------------------*/
1284/*--- Top-level entry point. ---*/
1285/*------------------------------------------------------------*/
sewardj3cf26a52006-07-27 23:48:53 +00001286
philippe84234902012-01-14 13:53:13 +00001287void MC_(detect_memory_leaks) ( ThreadId tid, LeakCheckParams* lcp)
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +00001288{
njnb965efb2009-08-10 07:36:54 +00001289 Int i, j;
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +00001290
philippe84234902012-01-14 13:53:13 +00001291 tl_assert(lcp->mode != LC_Off);
sewardjc8bd1df2011-06-26 12:41:33 +00001292
philippe84234902012-01-14 13:53:13 +00001293 MC_(detect_memory_leaks_last_delta_mode) = lcp->deltamode;
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +00001294
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001295 // Get the chunks, stop if there were none.
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +00001296 if (lc_chunks) {
1297 VG_(free)(lc_chunks);
1298 lc_chunks = NULL;
1299 }
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001300 lc_chunks = find_active_chunks(&lc_n_chunks);
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +00001301 lc_chunks_n_frees_marker = MC_(get_cmalloc_n_frees)();
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001302 if (lc_n_chunks == 0) {
1303 tl_assert(lc_chunks == NULL);
sewardjc8bd1df2011-06-26 12:41:33 +00001304 if (lr_table != NULL) {
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +00001305 // forget the previous recorded LossRecords as next leak search
1306 // can in any case just create new leaks.
sewardjc8bd1df2011-06-26 12:41:33 +00001307 // Maybe it would be better to rather call print_result ?
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +00001308 // (at least when leak decreases are requested)
sewardjc8bd1df2011-06-26 12:41:33 +00001309 // This will then output all LossRecords with a size decreasing to 0
1310 VG_(OSetGen_Destroy) (lr_table);
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +00001311 lr_table = NULL;
sewardjc8bd1df2011-06-26 12:41:33 +00001312 }
sewardj71bc3cb2005-05-19 00:25:45 +00001313 if (VG_(clo_verbosity) >= 1 && !VG_(clo_xml)) {
njnb6267bd2009-08-12 00:14:16 +00001314 VG_(umsg)("All heap blocks were freed -- no leaks are possible\n");
sewardj2d9e8742009-08-07 15:46:56 +00001315 VG_(umsg)("\n");
sewardj37d06f22003-09-17 21:48:26 +00001316 }
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +00001317 return;
1318 }
1319
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001320 // Sort the array so blocks are in ascending order in memory.
1321 VG_(ssort)(lc_chunks, lc_n_chunks, sizeof(VgHashNode*), compare_MC_Chunks);
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +00001322
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001323 // Sanity check -- make sure they're in order.
1324 for (i = 0; i < lc_n_chunks-1; i++) {
1325 tl_assert( lc_chunks[i]->data <= lc_chunks[i+1]->data);
1326 }
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +00001327
njnb965efb2009-08-10 07:36:54 +00001328 // Sanity check -- make sure they don't overlap. The one exception is that
1329 // we allow a MALLOCLIKE block to sit entirely within a malloc() block.
1330 // This is for bug 100628. If this occurs, we ignore the malloc() block
1331 // for leak-checking purposes. This is a hack and probably should be done
1332 // better, but at least it's consistent with mempools (which are treated
1333 // like this in find_active_chunks). Mempools have a separate VgHashTable
1334 // for mempool chunks, but if custom-allocated blocks are put in a separate
1335 // table from normal heap blocks it makes free-mismatch checking more
1336 // difficult.
1337 //
1338 // If this check fails, it probably means that the application
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001339 // has done something stupid with VALGRIND_MALLOCLIKE_BLOCK client
njnb965efb2009-08-10 07:36:54 +00001340 // requests, eg. has made overlapping requests (which are
1341 // nonsensical), or used VALGRIND_MALLOCLIKE_BLOCK for stack locations;
1342 // again nonsensical.
1343 //
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001344 for (i = 0; i < lc_n_chunks-1; i++) {
1345 MC_Chunk* ch1 = lc_chunks[i];
1346 MC_Chunk* ch2 = lc_chunks[i+1];
njnb965efb2009-08-10 07:36:54 +00001347
1348 Addr start1 = ch1->data;
1349 Addr start2 = ch2->data;
1350 Addr end1 = ch1->data + ch1->szB - 1;
1351 Addr end2 = ch2->data + ch2->szB - 1;
1352 Bool isCustom1 = ch1->allockind == MC_AllocCustom;
1353 Bool isCustom2 = ch2->allockind == MC_AllocCustom;
1354
1355 if (end1 < start2) {
1356 // Normal case - no overlap.
1357
1358 // We used to allow exact duplicates, I'm not sure why. --njn
1359 //} else if (start1 == start2 && end1 == end2) {
1360 // Degenerate case: exact duplicates.
1361
1362 } else if (start1 >= start2 && end1 <= end2 && isCustom1 && !isCustom2) {
1363 // Block i is MALLOCLIKE and entirely within block i+1.
1364 // Remove block i+1.
1365 for (j = i+1; j < lc_n_chunks-1; j++) {
1366 lc_chunks[j] = lc_chunks[j+1];
1367 }
1368 lc_n_chunks--;
1369
1370 } else if (start2 >= start1 && end2 <= end1 && isCustom2 && !isCustom1) {
1371 // Block i+1 is MALLOCLIKE and entirely within block i.
1372 // Remove block i.
1373 for (j = i; j < lc_n_chunks-1; j++) {
1374 lc_chunks[j] = lc_chunks[j+1];
1375 }
1376 lc_n_chunks--;
1377
1378 } else {
philippe09007e32012-03-01 22:00:36 +00001379 VG_(umsg)("Block 0x%lx..0x%lx overlaps with block 0x%lx..0x%lx\n",
bart3c4fa9f2011-05-09 10:46:55 +00001380 start1, end1, start2, end2);
philippe09007e32012-03-01 22:00:36 +00001381 VG_(umsg)("Blocks allocation contexts:\n"),
1382 VG_(pp_ExeContext)( ch1->where);
1383 VG_(umsg)("\n"),
1384 VG_(pp_ExeContext)( ch2->where);
njnb965efb2009-08-10 07:36:54 +00001385 VG_(umsg)("This is usually caused by using VALGRIND_MALLOCLIKE_BLOCK");
philippe09007e32012-03-01 22:00:36 +00001386 VG_(umsg)("in an inappropriate way.\n");
njnb965efb2009-08-10 07:36:54 +00001387 tl_assert (0);
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001388 }
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001389 }
1390
1391 // Initialise lc_extras.
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +00001392 if (lc_extras) {
1393 VG_(free)(lc_extras);
1394 lc_extras = NULL;
1395 }
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001396 lc_extras = VG_(malloc)( "mc.dml.2", lc_n_chunks * sizeof(LC_Extra) );
1397 for (i = 0; i < lc_n_chunks; i++) {
1398 lc_extras[i].state = Unreached;
tom1d0f3f62010-10-04 20:55:21 +00001399 lc_extras[i].pending = False;
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +00001400 lc_extras[i].IorC.indirect_szB = 0;
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001401 }
1402
1403 // Initialise lc_markstack.
1404 lc_markstack = VG_(malloc)( "mc.dml.2", lc_n_chunks * sizeof(Int) );
1405 for (i = 0; i < lc_n_chunks; i++) {
1406 lc_markstack[i] = -1;
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +00001407 }
1408 lc_markstack_top = -1;
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +00001409
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001410 // Verbosity.
sewardj2d9e8742009-08-07 15:46:56 +00001411 if (VG_(clo_verbosity) > 1 && !VG_(clo_xml)) {
njnb6267bd2009-08-12 00:14:16 +00001412 VG_(umsg)( "Searching for pointers to %'d not-freed blocks\n",
sewardj6b523cd2009-07-15 14:49:40 +00001413 lc_n_chunks );
sewardj2d9e8742009-08-07 15:46:56 +00001414 }
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +00001415
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001416 // Scan the memory root-set, pushing onto the mark stack any blocks
1417 // pointed to.
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +00001418 scan_memory_root_set(/*searched*/0, 0);
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +00001419
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001420 // Scan GP registers for chunk pointers.
1421 VG_(apply_to_GP_regs)(lc_push_if_a_chunk_ptr_register);
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +00001422
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001423 // Process the pushed blocks. After this, every block that is reachable
1424 // from the root-set has been traced.
1425 lc_process_markstack(/*clique*/-1);
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +00001426
njnb6267bd2009-08-12 00:14:16 +00001427 if (VG_(clo_verbosity) > 1 && !VG_(clo_xml)) {
1428 VG_(umsg)("Checked %'lu bytes\n", lc_scanned_szB);
1429 VG_(umsg)( "\n" );
1430 }
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +00001431
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001432 // Trace all the leaked blocks to determine which are directly leaked and
1433 // which are indirectly leaked. For each Unreached block, push it onto
1434 // the mark stack, and find all the as-yet-Unreached blocks reachable
1435 // from it. These form a clique and are marked IndirectLeak, and their
1436 // size is added to the clique leader's indirect size. If one of the
1437 // found blocks was itself a clique leader (from a previous clique), then
1438 // the cliques are merged.
1439 for (i = 0; i < lc_n_chunks; i++) {
1440 MC_Chunk* ch = lc_chunks[i];
1441 LC_Extra* ex = &(lc_extras[i]);
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +00001442
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001443 if (VG_DEBUG_CLIQUE)
1444 VG_(printf)("cliques: %d at %#lx -> Loss state %d\n",
1445 i, ch->data, ex->state);
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +00001446
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001447 tl_assert(lc_markstack_top == -1);
1448
1449 if (ex->state == Unreached) {
1450 if (VG_DEBUG_CLIQUE)
1451 VG_(printf)("%d: gathering clique %#lx\n", i, ch->data);
1452
1453 // Push this Unreached block onto the stack and process it.
1454 lc_push(i, ch);
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +00001455 lc_process_markstack(/*clique*/i);
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001456
1457 tl_assert(lc_markstack_top == -1);
1458 tl_assert(ex->state == Unreached);
nethercote0f19bce2003-12-02 10:17:44 +00001459 }
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +00001460 }
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001461
sewardjc8bd1df2011-06-26 12:41:33 +00001462 print_results( tid, lcp);
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +00001463
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +00001464 VG_(free) ( lc_markstack );
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +00001465 lc_markstack = NULL;
1466 // lc_chunks, lc_extras, lr_array and lr_table are kept (needed if user
1467 // calls MC_(print_block_list)). lr_table also used for delta leak reporting
1468 // between this leak search and the next leak search.
1469}
1470
1471static Addr searched_wpa;
1472static SizeT searched_szB;
1473static void
1474search_address_in_GP_reg(ThreadId tid, HChar* regname, Addr addr_in_reg)
1475{
1476 if (addr_in_reg >= searched_wpa
1477 && addr_in_reg < searched_wpa + searched_szB) {
1478 if (addr_in_reg == searched_wpa)
1479 VG_(umsg)
1480 ("tid %d register %s pointing at %#lx\n",
1481 tid, regname, searched_wpa);
1482 else
1483 VG_(umsg)
1484 ("tid %d register %s interior pointing %lu bytes inside %#lx\n",
1485 tid, regname, (long unsigned) addr_in_reg - searched_wpa,
1486 searched_wpa);
1487 }
1488}
1489
1490void MC_(who_points_at) ( Addr address, SizeT szB)
1491{
1492 MC_Chunk** chunks;
1493 Int n_chunks;
1494 Int i;
1495
1496 if (szB == 1)
1497 VG_(umsg) ("Searching for pointers to %#lx\n", address);
1498 else
1499 VG_(umsg) ("Searching for pointers pointing in %lu bytes from %#lx\n",
1500 szB, address);
1501
1502 // Scan memory root-set, searching for ptr pointing in address[szB]
1503 scan_memory_root_set(address, szB);
1504
1505 // Scan active malloc-ed chunks
1506 chunks = find_active_chunks(&n_chunks);
1507 for (i = 0; i < n_chunks; i++) {
1508 lc_scan_memory(chunks[i]->data, chunks[i]->szB,
1509 /*is_prior_definite*/True,
1510 /*clique*/-1, /*cur_clique*/-1,
1511 address, szB);
1512 }
1513 VG_(free) ( chunks );
1514
1515 // Scan GP registers for pointers to address range.
1516 searched_wpa = address;
1517 searched_szB = szB;
1518 VG_(apply_to_GP_regs)(search_address_in_GP_reg);
1519
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +00001520}
1521
1522/*--------------------------------------------------------------------*/
njn1d0825f2006-03-27 11:37:07 +00001523/*--- end ---*/
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +00001524/*--------------------------------------------------------------------*/
1525