blob: 9632391c3e76e3f8d61df298482c566e819c2293 [file] [log] [blame]
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +00001
2/*--------------------------------------------------------------------*/
njn1d0825f2006-03-27 11:37:07 +00003/*--- The leak checker. mc_leakcheck.c ---*/
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +00004/*--------------------------------------------------------------------*/
5
6/*
nethercote137bc552003-11-14 17:47:54 +00007 This file is part of MemCheck, a heavyweight Valgrind tool for
njn1d0825f2006-03-27 11:37:07 +00008 detecting memory errors.
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +00009
sewardj03f8d3f2012-08-05 15:46:46 +000010 Copyright (C) 2000-2012 Julian Seward
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +000011 jseward@acm.org
12
13 This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
14 modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
15 published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the
16 License, or (at your option) any later version.
17
18 This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but
19 WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
20 MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
21 General Public License for more details.
22
23 You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
24 along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
25 Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA
26 02111-1307, USA.
27
28 The GNU General Public License is contained in the file COPYING.
29*/
30
njnc7561b92005-06-19 01:24:32 +000031#include "pub_tool_basics.h"
sewardj4cfea4f2006-10-14 19:26:10 +000032#include "pub_tool_vki.h"
njnac1e0332009-05-08 00:39:31 +000033#include "pub_tool_aspacehl.h"
njn4802b382005-06-11 04:58:29 +000034#include "pub_tool_aspacemgr.h"
njn1d0825f2006-03-27 11:37:07 +000035#include "pub_tool_execontext.h"
36#include "pub_tool_hashtable.h"
njn97405b22005-06-02 03:39:33 +000037#include "pub_tool_libcbase.h"
njn132bfcc2005-06-04 19:16:06 +000038#include "pub_tool_libcassert.h"
njn36a20fa2005-06-03 03:08:39 +000039#include "pub_tool_libcprint.h"
njnde62cbf2005-06-10 22:08:14 +000040#include "pub_tool_libcsignal.h"
njn6ace3ea2005-06-17 03:06:27 +000041#include "pub_tool_machine.h"
njnc7561b92005-06-19 01:24:32 +000042#include "pub_tool_mallocfree.h"
43#include "pub_tool_options.h"
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +000044#include "pub_tool_oset.h"
philippe6643e962012-01-17 21:16:30 +000045#include "pub_tool_poolalloc.h"
46#include "pub_tool_signals.h" // Needed for mc_include.h
sewardj6c591e12011-04-11 16:17:51 +000047#include "pub_tool_libcsetjmp.h" // setjmp facilities
njn1d0825f2006-03-27 11:37:07 +000048#include "pub_tool_tooliface.h" // Needed for mc_include.h
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +000049
njn1d0825f2006-03-27 11:37:07 +000050#include "mc_include.h"
njnc7561b92005-06-19 01:24:32 +000051
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +000052/*------------------------------------------------------------*/
53/*--- An overview of leak checking. ---*/
54/*------------------------------------------------------------*/
njnc7561b92005-06-19 01:24:32 +000055
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +000056// Leak-checking is a directed-graph traversal problem. The graph has
57// two kinds of nodes:
58// - root-set nodes:
59// - GP registers of all threads;
60// - valid, aligned, pointer-sized data words in valid client memory,
61// including stacks, but excluding words within client heap-allocated
62// blocks (they are excluded so that later on we can differentiate
63// between heap blocks that are indirectly leaked vs. directly leaked).
64// - heap-allocated blocks. A block is a mempool chunk or a malloc chunk
65// that doesn't contain a mempool chunk. Nb: the terms "blocks" and
66// "chunks" are used interchangeably below.
67//
68// There are two kinds of edges:
69// - start-pointers, i.e. pointers to the start of a block;
70// - interior-pointers, i.e. pointers to the interior of a block.
71//
72// We use "pointers" rather than "edges" below.
73//
74// Root set nodes only point to blocks. Blocks only point to blocks;
75// a block can point to itself.
76//
77// The aim is to traverse the graph and determine the status of each block.
78//
79// There are 9 distinct cases. See memcheck/docs/mc-manual.xml for details.
80// Presenting all nine categories to the user is probably too much.
81// Currently we do this:
82// - definitely lost: case 3
83// - indirectly lost: case 4, 9
84// - possibly lost: cases 5..8
85// - still reachable: cases 1, 2
86//
87// It's far from clear that this is the best possible categorisation; it's
88// accreted over time without any central guiding principle.
89
90/*------------------------------------------------------------*/
91/*--- XXX: Thoughts for improvement. ---*/
92/*------------------------------------------------------------*/
93
94// From the user's point of view:
95// - If they aren't using interior-pointers, they just have to fix the
96// directly lost blocks, and the indirectly lost ones will be fixed as
97// part of that. Any possibly lost blocks will just be due to random
98// pointer garbage and can be ignored.
99//
100// - If they are using interior-pointers, the fact that they currently are not
101// being told which ones might be directly lost vs. indirectly lost makes
102// it hard to know where to begin.
103//
104// All this makes me wonder if new option is warranted:
105// --follow-interior-pointers. By default it would be off, the leak checker
106// wouldn't follow interior-pointers and there would only be 3 categories:
107// R, DL, IL.
108//
109// If turned on, then it would show 7 categories (R, DL, IL, DR/DL, IR/IL,
110// IR/IL/DL, IL/DL). That output is harder to understand but it's your own
111// damn fault for using interior-pointers...
112//
113// ----
114//
115// Also, why are two blank lines printed between each loss record?
njnc2f8b1b2009-08-10 06:47:00 +0000116// [bug 197930]
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000117//
118// ----
119//
120// Also, --show-reachable is a bad name because it also turns on the showing
121// of indirectly leaked blocks(!) It would be better named --show-all or
122// --show-all-heap-blocks, because that's the end result.
123//
124// ----
125//
126// Also, the VALGRIND_LEAK_CHECK and VALGRIND_QUICK_LEAK_CHECK aren't great
127// names. VALGRIND_FULL_LEAK_CHECK and VALGRIND_SUMMARY_LEAK_CHECK would be
128// better.
129//
130// ----
131//
132// Also, VALGRIND_COUNT_LEAKS and VALGRIND_COUNT_LEAK_BLOCKS aren't great as
133// they combine direct leaks and indirect leaks into one. New, more precise
134// ones (they'll need new names) would be good. If more categories are
135// used, as per the --follow-interior-pointers option, they should be
136// updated accordingly. And they should use a struct to return the values.
137//
138// ----
139//
140// Also, for this case:
141//
142// (4) p4 BBB ---> AAA
143//
144// BBB is definitely directly lost. AAA is definitely indirectly lost.
145// Here's the relevant loss records printed for a full check (each block is
146// 16 bytes):
147//
148// ==20397== 16 bytes in 1 blocks are indirectly lost in loss record 9 of 15
149// ==20397== at 0x4C2694E: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:177)
150// ==20397== by 0x400521: mk (leak-cases.c:49)
151// ==20397== by 0x400578: main (leak-cases.c:72)
152//
153// ==20397== 32 (16 direct, 16 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely
154// lost in loss record 14 of 15
155// ==20397== at 0x4C2694E: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:177)
156// ==20397== by 0x400521: mk (leak-cases.c:49)
157// ==20397== by 0x400580: main (leak-cases.c:72)
158//
159// The first one is fine -- it describes AAA.
160//
161// The second one is for BBB. It's correct in that 16 bytes in 1 block are
162// directly lost. It's also correct that 16 are indirectly lost as a result,
163// but it means that AAA is being counted twice in the loss records. (It's
164// not, thankfully, counted twice in the summary counts). Argh.
165//
166// This would be less confusing for the second one:
167//
168// ==20397== 16 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 14
169// of 15 (and 16 bytes in 1 block are indirectly lost as a result; they
170// are mentioned elsewhere (if --show-reachable=yes is given!))
171// ==20397== at 0x4C2694E: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:177)
172// ==20397== by 0x400521: mk (leak-cases.c:49)
173// ==20397== by 0x400580: main (leak-cases.c:72)
174//
175// But ideally we'd present the loss record for the directly lost block and
176// then the resultant indirectly lost blocks and make it clear the
177// dependence. Double argh.
178
179/*------------------------------------------------------------*/
180/*--- The actual algorithm. ---*/
181/*------------------------------------------------------------*/
182
183// - Find all the blocks (a.k.a. chunks) to check. Mempool chunks require
184// some special treatment because they can be within malloc'd blocks.
185// - Scan every word in the root set (GP registers and valid
186// non-heap memory words).
187// - First, we skip if it doesn't point to valid memory.
188// - Then, we see if it points to the start or interior of a block. If
189// so, we push the block onto the mark stack and mark it as having been
190// reached.
191// - Then, we process the mark stack, repeating the scanning for each block;
192// this can push more blocks onto the mark stack. We repeat until the
193// mark stack is empty. Each block is marked as definitely or possibly
194// reachable, depending on whether interior-pointers were required to
195// reach it.
196// - At this point we know for every block if it's reachable or not.
197// - We then push each unreached block onto the mark stack, using the block
198// number as the "clique" number.
199// - We process the mark stack again, this time grouping blocks into cliques
200// in order to facilitate the directly/indirectly lost categorisation.
201// - We group blocks by their ExeContexts and categorisation, and print them
202// if --leak-check=full. We also print summary numbers.
203//
204// A note on "cliques":
205// - A directly lost block is one with no pointers to it. An indirectly
206// lost block is one that is pointed to by a directly or indirectly lost
207// block.
208// - Each directly lost block has zero or more indirectly lost blocks
209// hanging off it. All these blocks together form a "clique". The
210// directly lost block is called the "clique leader". The clique number
211// is the number (in lc_chunks[]) of the clique leader.
212// - Actually, a directly lost block may be pointed to if it's part of a
213// cycle. In that case, there may be more than one choice for the clique
214// leader, and the choice is arbitrary. Eg. if you have A-->B and B-->A
215// either A or B could be the clique leader.
216// - Cliques cannot overlap, and will be truncated to avoid this. Eg. if we
217// have A-->C and B-->C, the two cliques will be {A,C} and {B}, or {A} and
218// {B,C} (again the choice is arbitrary). This is because we don't want
219// to count a block as indirectly lost more than once.
220//
221// A note on 'is_prior_definite':
222// - This is a boolean used in various places that indicates if the chain
223// up to the prior node (prior to the one being considered) is definite.
224// - In the clique == -1 case:
225// - if True it means that the prior node is a root-set node, or that the
226// prior node is a block which is reachable from the root-set via
227// start-pointers.
228// - if False it means that the prior node is a block that is only
229// reachable from the root-set via a path including at least one
230// interior-pointer.
231// - In the clique != -1 case, currently it's always True because we treat
232// start-pointers and interior-pointers the same for direct/indirect leak
233// checking. If we added a PossibleIndirectLeak state then this would
234// change.
235
236
237// Define to debug the memory-leak-detector.
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000238#define VG_DEBUG_LEAKCHECK 0
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000239#define VG_DEBUG_CLIQUE 0
240
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000241
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +0000242/*------------------------------------------------------------*/
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000243/*--- Getting the initial chunks, and searching them. ---*/
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +0000244/*------------------------------------------------------------*/
245
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000246// Compare the MC_Chunks by 'data' (i.e. the address of the block).
florian6bd9dc12012-11-23 16:17:43 +0000247static Int compare_MC_Chunks(const void* n1, const void* n2)
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +0000248{
florian3e798632012-11-24 19:41:54 +0000249 const MC_Chunk* mc1 = *(const MC_Chunk *const *)n1;
250 const MC_Chunk* mc2 = *(const MC_Chunk *const *)n2;
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000251 if (mc1->data < mc2->data) return -1;
252 if (mc1->data > mc2->data) return 1;
253 return 0;
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +0000254}
255
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000256#if VG_DEBUG_LEAKCHECK
257// Used to sanity-check the fast binary-search mechanism.
258static
259Int find_chunk_for_OLD ( Addr ptr,
260 MC_Chunk** chunks,
261 Int n_chunks )
262
263{
264 Int i;
265 Addr a_lo, a_hi;
266 PROF_EVENT(70, "find_chunk_for_OLD");
267 for (i = 0; i < n_chunks; i++) {
268 PROF_EVENT(71, "find_chunk_for_OLD(loop)");
269 a_lo = chunks[i]->data;
270 a_hi = ((Addr)chunks[i]->data) + chunks[i]->szB;
271 if (a_lo <= ptr && ptr < a_hi)
272 return i;
273 }
274 return -1;
275}
276#endif
277
278// Find the i such that ptr points at or inside the block described by
279// chunks[i]. Return -1 if none found. This assumes that chunks[]
280// has been sorted on the 'data' field.
281static
282Int find_chunk_for ( Addr ptr,
283 MC_Chunk** chunks,
284 Int n_chunks )
285{
286 Addr a_mid_lo, a_mid_hi;
287 Int lo, mid, hi, retVal;
288 // VG_(printf)("find chunk for %p = ", ptr);
289 retVal = -1;
290 lo = 0;
291 hi = n_chunks-1;
292 while (True) {
293 // Invariant: current unsearched space is from lo to hi, inclusive.
294 if (lo > hi) break; // not found
295
296 mid = (lo + hi) / 2;
297 a_mid_lo = chunks[mid]->data;
298 a_mid_hi = chunks[mid]->data + chunks[mid]->szB;
299 // Extent of block 'mid' is [a_mid_lo .. a_mid_hi).
300 // Special-case zero-sized blocks - treat them as if they had
301 // size 1. Not doing so causes them to not cover any address
302 // range at all and so will never be identified as the target of
303 // any pointer, which causes them to be incorrectly reported as
304 // definitely leaked.
305 if (chunks[mid]->szB == 0)
306 a_mid_hi++;
307
308 if (ptr < a_mid_lo) {
309 hi = mid-1;
310 continue;
311 }
312 if (ptr >= a_mid_hi) {
313 lo = mid+1;
314 continue;
315 }
316 tl_assert(ptr >= a_mid_lo && ptr < a_mid_hi);
317 retVal = mid;
318 break;
319 }
320
321# if VG_DEBUG_LEAKCHECK
322 tl_assert(retVal == find_chunk_for_OLD ( ptr, chunks, n_chunks ));
323# endif
324 // VG_(printf)("%d\n", retVal);
325 return retVal;
326}
327
328
329static MC_Chunk**
florian54fe2022012-10-27 23:07:42 +0000330find_active_chunks(Int* pn_chunks)
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000331{
332 // Our goal is to construct a set of chunks that includes every
333 // mempool chunk, and every malloc region that *doesn't* contain a
334 // mempool chunk.
335 MC_Mempool *mp;
336 MC_Chunk **mallocs, **chunks, *mc;
337 UInt n_mallocs, n_chunks, m, s;
338 Bool *malloc_chunk_holds_a_pool_chunk;
339
340 // First we collect all the malloc chunks into an array and sort it.
341 // We do this because we want to query the chunks by interior
342 // pointers, requiring binary search.
343 mallocs = (MC_Chunk**) VG_(HT_to_array)( MC_(malloc_list), &n_mallocs );
344 if (n_mallocs == 0) {
345 tl_assert(mallocs == NULL);
346 *pn_chunks = 0;
347 return NULL;
348 }
349 VG_(ssort)(mallocs, n_mallocs, sizeof(VgHashNode*), compare_MC_Chunks);
350
351 // Then we build an array containing a Bool for each malloc chunk,
352 // indicating whether it contains any mempools.
353 malloc_chunk_holds_a_pool_chunk = VG_(calloc)( "mc.fas.1",
354 n_mallocs, sizeof(Bool) );
355 n_chunks = n_mallocs;
356
357 // Then we loop over the mempool tables. For each chunk in each
358 // pool, we set the entry in the Bool array corresponding to the
359 // malloc chunk containing the mempool chunk.
360 VG_(HT_ResetIter)(MC_(mempool_list));
361 while ( (mp = VG_(HT_Next)(MC_(mempool_list))) ) {
362 VG_(HT_ResetIter)(mp->chunks);
363 while ( (mc = VG_(HT_Next)(mp->chunks)) ) {
364
365 // We'll need to record this chunk.
366 n_chunks++;
367
368 // Possibly invalidate the malloc holding the beginning of this chunk.
369 m = find_chunk_for(mc->data, mallocs, n_mallocs);
370 if (m != -1 && malloc_chunk_holds_a_pool_chunk[m] == False) {
371 tl_assert(n_chunks > 0);
372 n_chunks--;
373 malloc_chunk_holds_a_pool_chunk[m] = True;
374 }
375
376 // Possibly invalidate the malloc holding the end of this chunk.
377 if (mc->szB > 1) {
378 m = find_chunk_for(mc->data + (mc->szB - 1), mallocs, n_mallocs);
379 if (m != -1 && malloc_chunk_holds_a_pool_chunk[m] == False) {
380 tl_assert(n_chunks > 0);
381 n_chunks--;
382 malloc_chunk_holds_a_pool_chunk[m] = True;
383 }
384 }
385 }
386 }
387 tl_assert(n_chunks > 0);
388
389 // Create final chunk array.
390 chunks = VG_(malloc)("mc.fas.2", sizeof(VgHashNode*) * (n_chunks));
391 s = 0;
392
393 // Copy the mempool chunks and the non-marked malloc chunks into a
394 // combined array of chunks.
395 VG_(HT_ResetIter)(MC_(mempool_list));
396 while ( (mp = VG_(HT_Next)(MC_(mempool_list))) ) {
397 VG_(HT_ResetIter)(mp->chunks);
398 while ( (mc = VG_(HT_Next)(mp->chunks)) ) {
399 tl_assert(s < n_chunks);
400 chunks[s++] = mc;
401 }
402 }
403 for (m = 0; m < n_mallocs; ++m) {
404 if (!malloc_chunk_holds_a_pool_chunk[m]) {
405 tl_assert(s < n_chunks);
406 chunks[s++] = mallocs[m];
407 }
408 }
409 tl_assert(s == n_chunks);
410
411 // Free temporaries.
412 VG_(free)(mallocs);
413 VG_(free)(malloc_chunk_holds_a_pool_chunk);
414
415 *pn_chunks = n_chunks;
416
417 return chunks;
418}
419
420/*------------------------------------------------------------*/
421/*--- The leak detector proper. ---*/
422/*------------------------------------------------------------*/
423
424// Holds extra info about each block during leak checking.
425typedef
426 struct {
427 UInt state:2; // Reachedness.
tom1d0f3f62010-10-04 20:55:21 +0000428 UInt pending:1; // Scan pending.
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +0000429 union {
430 SizeT indirect_szB : (sizeof(SizeT)*8)-3; // If Unreached, how many bytes
431 // are unreachable from here.
432 SizeT clique : (sizeof(SizeT)*8)-3; // if IndirectLeak, clique leader
433 // to which it belongs.
434 } IorC;
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000435 }
436 LC_Extra;
437
438// An array holding pointers to every chunk we're checking. Sorted by address.
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +0000439// lc_chunks is initialised during leak search. It is kept after leak search
440// to support printing the list of blocks belonging to a loss record.
441// lc_chunk array can only be used validly till the next "free" operation
442// (as a free operation potentially destroys one or more chunks).
443// To detect lc_chunk is valid, we store the nr of frees operations done
444// when lc_chunk was build : lc_chunks (and lc_extras) stays valid as
445// long as no free operations has been done since lc_chunks building.
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000446static MC_Chunk** lc_chunks;
447// How many chunks we're dealing with.
448static Int lc_n_chunks;
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +0000449static SizeT lc_chunks_n_frees_marker;
450// This has the same number of entries as lc_chunks, and each entry
451// in lc_chunks corresponds with the entry here (ie. lc_chunks[i] and
452// lc_extras[i] describe the same block).
453static LC_Extra* lc_extras;
454
sewardjc8bd1df2011-06-26 12:41:33 +0000455// chunks will be converted and merged in loss record, maintained in lr_table
456// lr_table elements are kept from one leak_search to another to implement
457// the "print new/changed leaks" client request
458static OSet* lr_table;
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +0000459// Array of sorted loss record (produced during last leak search).
460static LossRecord** lr_array;
461
sewardjc8bd1df2011-06-26 12:41:33 +0000462
463// DeltaMode used the last time we called detect_memory_leaks.
464// The recorded leak errors must be output using a logic based on this delta_mode.
465// The below avoids replicating the delta_mode in each LossRecord.
466LeakCheckDeltaMode MC_(detect_memory_leaks_last_delta_mode);
467
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000468
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000469// Records chunks that are currently being processed. Each element in the
470// stack is an index into lc_chunks and lc_extras. Its size is
471// 'lc_n_chunks' because in the worst case that's how many chunks could be
472// pushed onto it (actually I think the maximum is lc_n_chunks-1 but let's
473// be conservative).
474static Int* lc_markstack;
475// The index of the top element of the stack; -1 if the stack is empty, 0 if
476// the stack has one element, 1 if it has two, etc.
477static Int lc_markstack_top;
478
479// Keeps track of how many bytes of memory we've scanned, for printing.
480// (Nb: We don't keep track of how many register bytes we've scanned.)
481static SizeT lc_scanned_szB;
482
483
484SizeT MC_(bytes_leaked) = 0;
485SizeT MC_(bytes_indirect) = 0;
486SizeT MC_(bytes_dubious) = 0;
487SizeT MC_(bytes_reachable) = 0;
488SizeT MC_(bytes_suppressed) = 0;
489
490SizeT MC_(blocks_leaked) = 0;
491SizeT MC_(blocks_indirect) = 0;
492SizeT MC_(blocks_dubious) = 0;
493SizeT MC_(blocks_reachable) = 0;
494SizeT MC_(blocks_suppressed) = 0;
495
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000496// Determines if a pointer is to a chunk. Returns the chunk number et al
497// via call-by-reference.
498static Bool
499lc_is_a_chunk_ptr(Addr ptr, Int* pch_no, MC_Chunk** pch, LC_Extra** pex)
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +0000500{
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000501 Int ch_no;
502 MC_Chunk* ch;
503 LC_Extra* ex;
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +0000504
philippe57a16a22012-07-18 22:26:51 +0000505 // Quick filter. Note: implemented with am, not with get_vabits2
506 // as ptr might be random data pointing anywhere. On 64 bit
507 // platforms, getting va bits for random data can be quite costly
508 // due to the secondary map.
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000509 if (!VG_(am_is_valid_for_client)(ptr, 1, VKI_PROT_READ)) {
510 return False;
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000511 } else {
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000512 ch_no = find_chunk_for(ptr, lc_chunks, lc_n_chunks);
513 tl_assert(ch_no >= -1 && ch_no < lc_n_chunks);
514
515 if (ch_no == -1) {
516 return False;
517 } else {
518 // Ok, we've found a pointer to a chunk. Get the MC_Chunk and its
519 // LC_Extra.
520 ch = lc_chunks[ch_no];
521 ex = &(lc_extras[ch_no]);
522
523 tl_assert(ptr >= ch->data);
524 tl_assert(ptr < ch->data + ch->szB + (ch->szB==0 ? 1 : 0));
525
526 if (VG_DEBUG_LEAKCHECK)
527 VG_(printf)("ptr=%#lx -> block %d\n", ptr, ch_no);
528
529 *pch_no = ch_no;
530 *pch = ch;
531 *pex = ex;
532
533 return True;
534 }
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000535 }
536}
537
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000538// Push a chunk (well, just its index) onto the mark stack.
539static void lc_push(Int ch_no, MC_Chunk* ch)
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000540{
tom1d0f3f62010-10-04 20:55:21 +0000541 if (!lc_extras[ch_no].pending) {
542 if (0) {
543 VG_(printf)("pushing %#lx-%#lx\n", ch->data, ch->data + ch->szB);
544 }
545 lc_markstack_top++;
546 tl_assert(lc_markstack_top < lc_n_chunks);
547 lc_markstack[lc_markstack_top] = ch_no;
548 tl_assert(!lc_extras[ch_no].pending);
549 lc_extras[ch_no].pending = True;
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000550 }
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000551}
552
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000553// Return the index of the chunk on the top of the mark stack, or -1 if
554// there isn't one.
555static Bool lc_pop(Int* ret)
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000556{
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000557 if (-1 == lc_markstack_top) {
558 return False;
559 } else {
560 tl_assert(0 <= lc_markstack_top && lc_markstack_top < lc_n_chunks);
561 *ret = lc_markstack[lc_markstack_top];
562 lc_markstack_top--;
tom1d0f3f62010-10-04 20:55:21 +0000563 tl_assert(lc_extras[*ret].pending);
564 lc_extras[*ret].pending = False;
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000565 return True;
566 }
567}
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000568
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000569
570// If 'ptr' is pointing to a heap-allocated block which hasn't been seen
571// before, push it onto the mark stack.
572static void
573lc_push_without_clique_if_a_chunk_ptr(Addr ptr, Bool is_prior_definite)
574{
575 Int ch_no;
576 MC_Chunk* ch;
577 LC_Extra* ex;
578
579 if ( ! lc_is_a_chunk_ptr(ptr, &ch_no, &ch, &ex) )
580 return;
tom1d0f3f62010-10-04 20:55:21 +0000581
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000582 // Possibly upgrade the state, ie. one of:
583 // - Unreached --> Possible
584 // - Unreached --> Reachable
585 // - Possible --> Reachable
tom1d0f3f62010-10-04 20:55:21 +0000586 if (ptr == ch->data && is_prior_definite && ex->state != Reachable) {
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000587 // 'ptr' points to the start of the block, and the prior node is
588 // definite, which means that this block is definitely reachable.
589 ex->state = Reachable;
590
tom1d0f3f62010-10-04 20:55:21 +0000591 // State has changed to Reachable so (re)scan the block to make
592 // sure any blocks it points to are correctly marked.
593 lc_push(ch_no, ch);
594
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000595 } else if (ex->state == Unreached) {
596 // Either 'ptr' is a interior-pointer, or the prior node isn't definite,
597 // which means that we can only mark this block as possibly reachable.
598 ex->state = Possible;
tom1d0f3f62010-10-04 20:55:21 +0000599
600 // State has changed to Possible so (re)scan the block to make
601 // sure any blocks it points to are correctly marked.
602 lc_push(ch_no, ch);
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000603 }
604}
605
606static void
florian6bd9dc12012-11-23 16:17:43 +0000607lc_push_if_a_chunk_ptr_register(ThreadId tid, const HChar* regname, Addr ptr)
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000608{
609 lc_push_without_clique_if_a_chunk_ptr(ptr, /*is_prior_definite*/True);
610}
611
612// If ptr is pointing to a heap-allocated block which hasn't been seen
613// before, push it onto the mark stack. Clique is the index of the
614// clique leader.
615static void
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +0000616lc_push_with_clique_if_a_chunk_ptr(Addr ptr, Int clique, Int cur_clique)
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000617{
618 Int ch_no;
619 MC_Chunk* ch;
620 LC_Extra* ex;
621
622 tl_assert(0 <= clique && clique < lc_n_chunks);
623
624 if ( ! lc_is_a_chunk_ptr(ptr, &ch_no, &ch, &ex) )
625 return;
626
627 // If it's not Unreached, it's already been handled so ignore it.
628 // If ch_no==clique, it's the clique leader, which means this is a cyclic
629 // structure; again ignore it because it's already been handled.
630 if (ex->state == Unreached && ch_no != clique) {
631 // Note that, unlike reachable blocks, we currently don't distinguish
632 // between start-pointers and interior-pointers here. We probably
633 // should, though.
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000634 lc_push(ch_no, ch);
635
636 // Add the block to the clique, and add its size to the
637 // clique-leader's indirect size. Also, if the new block was
638 // itself a clique leader, it isn't any more, so add its
639 // indirect_szB to the new clique leader.
640 if (VG_DEBUG_CLIQUE) {
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +0000641 if (ex->IorC.indirect_szB > 0)
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000642 VG_(printf)(" clique %d joining clique %d adding %lu+%lu\n",
bartdc429d12011-07-29 14:24:07 +0000643 ch_no, clique, (unsigned long)ch->szB,
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +0000644 (unsigned long)ex->IorC.indirect_szB);
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000645 else
646 VG_(printf)(" block %d joining clique %d adding %lu\n",
bartdc429d12011-07-29 14:24:07 +0000647 ch_no, clique, (unsigned long)ch->szB);
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000648 }
649
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +0000650 lc_extras[clique].IorC.indirect_szB += ch->szB;
651 lc_extras[clique].IorC.indirect_szB += ex->IorC.indirect_szB;
652 ex->state = IndirectLeak;
653 ex->IorC.clique = (SizeT) cur_clique;
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000654 }
655}
656
657static void
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +0000658lc_push_if_a_chunk_ptr(Addr ptr, Int clique, Int cur_clique, Bool is_prior_definite)
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000659{
660 if (-1 == clique)
661 lc_push_without_clique_if_a_chunk_ptr(ptr, is_prior_definite);
662 else
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +0000663 lc_push_with_clique_if_a_chunk_ptr(ptr, clique, cur_clique);
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000664}
665
sewardj45d94cc2005-04-20 14:44:11 +0000666
sewardj97d3ebb2011-04-11 18:36:34 +0000667static VG_MINIMAL_JMP_BUF(memscan_jmpbuf);
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000668
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000669static
670void scan_all_valid_memory_catcher ( Int sigNo, Addr addr )
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000671{
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000672 if (0)
673 VG_(printf)("OUCH! sig=%d addr=%#lx\n", sigNo, addr);
674 if (sigNo == VKI_SIGSEGV || sigNo == VKI_SIGBUS)
sewardj6c591e12011-04-11 16:17:51 +0000675 VG_MINIMAL_LONGJMP(memscan_jmpbuf);
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000676}
677
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +0000678// lc_scan_memory has 2 modes:
679//
680// 1. Leak check mode (searched == 0).
681// -----------------------------------
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000682// Scan a block of memory between [start, start+len). This range may
683// be bogus, inaccessable, or otherwise strange; we deal with it. For each
684// valid aligned word we assume it's a pointer to a chunk a push the chunk
685// onto the mark stack if so.
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +0000686// clique is the "highest level clique" in which indirectly leaked blocks have
687// to be collected. cur_clique is the current "lower" level clique through which
688// the memory to be scanned has been found.
689// Example: in the below tree if A is leaked, the top level clique will
690// be A, while lower level cliques will be B and C.
691/*
692 A
693 / \
694 B C
695 / \ / \
696 D E F G
697*/
698// Proper handling of top and lowest level clique allows block_list of a loss
699// record to describe the hierarchy of indirectly leaked blocks.
700//
701// 2. Search ptr mode (searched != 0).
702// -----------------------------------
703// In this mode, searches for pointers to a specific address range
704// In such a case, lc_scan_memory just scans [start..start+len[ for pointers to searched
705// and outputs the places where searched is found. It does not recursively scans the
706// found memory.
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000707static void
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +0000708lc_scan_memory(Addr start, SizeT len, Bool is_prior_definite, Int clique, Int cur_clique,
709 Addr searched, SizeT szB)
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000710{
philippe57a16a22012-07-18 22:26:51 +0000711 /* memory scan is based on the assumption that valid pointers are aligned
712 on a multiple of sizeof(Addr). So, we can (and must) skip the begin and
713 end portions of the block if they are not aligned on sizeof(Addr):
714 These cannot be a valid pointer, and calls to MC_(is_valid_aligned_word)
715 will assert for a non aligned address. */
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000716 Addr ptr = VG_ROUNDUP(start, sizeof(Addr));
njn13bfd852005-06-02 03:52:53 +0000717 Addr end = VG_ROUNDDN(start+len, sizeof(Addr));
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000718 vki_sigset_t sigmask;
719
720 if (VG_DEBUG_LEAKCHECK)
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000721 VG_(printf)("scan %#lx-%#lx (%lu)\n", start, end, len);
722
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000723 VG_(sigprocmask)(VKI_SIG_SETMASK, NULL, &sigmask);
njn695c16e2005-03-27 03:40:28 +0000724 VG_(set_fault_catcher)(scan_all_valid_memory_catcher);
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000725
philippe57a16a22012-07-18 22:26:51 +0000726 /* Optimisation: the loop below will check for each begin
727 of SM chunk if the chunk is fully unaddressable. The idea is to
728 skip efficiently such fully unaddressable SM chunks.
729 So, we preferrably start the loop on a chunk boundary.
730 If the chunk is not fully unaddressable, we might be in
731 an unaddressable page. Again, the idea is to skip efficiently
732 such unaddressable page : this is the "else" part.
733 We use an "else" so that two consecutive fully unaddressable
734 SM chunks will be skipped efficiently: first one is skipped
735 by this piece of code. The next SM chunk will be skipped inside
736 the loop. */
737 if ( ! MC_(is_within_valid_secondary)(ptr) ) {
738 // Skip an invalid SM chunk till the beginning of the next SM Chunk.
739 ptr = VG_ROUNDUP(ptr+1, SM_SIZE);
740 } else if (!VG_(am_is_valid_for_client)(ptr, sizeof(Addr), VKI_PROT_READ)) {
741 // else we are in a (at least partially) valid SM chunk.
742 // We might be in the middle of an unreadable page.
743 // Do a cheap check to see if it's valid;
744 // if not, skip onto the next page.
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000745 ptr = VG_PGROUNDUP(ptr+1); // First page is bad - skip it.
philippe57a16a22012-07-18 22:26:51 +0000746 }
747 /* This optimisation and below loop is based on some relationships between
748 VKI_PAGE_SIZE, SM_SIZE and sizeof(Addr) which are asserted in
749 MC_(detect_memory_leaks). */
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000750
sewardj05fe85e2005-04-27 22:46:36 +0000751 while (ptr < end) {
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000752 Addr addr;
753
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000754 // Skip invalid chunks.
philippe57a16a22012-07-18 22:26:51 +0000755 if (UNLIKELY((ptr % SM_SIZE) == 0)) {
756 if (! MC_(is_within_valid_secondary)(ptr) ) {
757 ptr = VG_ROUNDUP(ptr+1, SM_SIZE);
758 continue;
759 }
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000760 }
761
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000762 // Look to see if this page seems reasonable.
philippe57a16a22012-07-18 22:26:51 +0000763 if (UNLIKELY((ptr % VKI_PAGE_SIZE) == 0)) {
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000764 if (!VG_(am_is_valid_for_client)(ptr, sizeof(Addr), VKI_PROT_READ)) {
765 ptr += VKI_PAGE_SIZE; // Bad page - skip it.
766 continue;
767 }
philippe57a16a22012-07-18 22:26:51 +0000768 // aspacemgr indicates the page is readable and belongs to client.
769 // We still probe the page explicitely in case aspacemgr is
770 // desynchronised with the real page mappings.
771 // Such a desynchronisation can happen due to an aspacemgr bug.
772 // Note that if the application is using mprotect(NONE), then
773 // a page can be unreadable but have addressable and defined
774 // VA bits (see mc_main.c function mc_new_mem_mprotect).
775 if (VG_MINIMAL_SETJMP(memscan_jmpbuf) == 0) {
776 // Try a read in the beginning of the page ...
777 Addr test = *(volatile Addr *)ptr;
778 __asm__ __volatile__("": :"r"(test) : "cc","memory");
779 } else {
780 // Catch read error ...
781 // We need to restore the signal mask, because we were
782 // longjmped out of a signal handler.
783 VG_(sigprocmask)(VKI_SIG_SETMASK, &sigmask, NULL);
784 ptr += VKI_PAGE_SIZE; // Bad page - skip it.
785 continue;
786 }
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000787 }
788
philippe57a16a22012-07-18 22:26:51 +0000789 if ( MC_(is_valid_aligned_word)(ptr) ) {
790 lc_scanned_szB += sizeof(Addr);
791 addr = *(Addr *)ptr;
792 // If we get here, the scanned word is in valid memory. Now
793 // let's see if its contents point to a chunk.
794 if (UNLIKELY(searched)) {
795 if (addr >= searched && addr < searched + szB) {
796 if (addr == searched)
797 VG_(umsg)("*%#lx points at %#lx\n", ptr, searched);
798 else
799 VG_(umsg)("*%#lx interior points at %lu bytes inside %#lx\n",
800 ptr, (long unsigned) addr - searched, searched);
801 MC_(pp_describe_addr) (ptr);
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +0000802 }
philippe57a16a22012-07-18 22:26:51 +0000803 } else {
804 lc_push_if_a_chunk_ptr(addr, clique, cur_clique, is_prior_definite);
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000805 }
philippe57a16a22012-07-18 22:26:51 +0000806 } else if (0 && VG_DEBUG_LEAKCHECK) {
807 VG_(printf)("%#lx not valid\n", ptr);
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000808 }
philippe57a16a22012-07-18 22:26:51 +0000809 ptr += sizeof(Addr);
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000810 }
811
812 VG_(sigprocmask)(VKI_SIG_SETMASK, &sigmask, NULL);
813 VG_(set_fault_catcher)(NULL);
814}
815
sewardj45d94cc2005-04-20 14:44:11 +0000816
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000817// Process the mark stack until empty.
818static void lc_process_markstack(Int clique)
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000819{
njne3675d62009-05-19 02:08:25 +0000820 Int top = -1; // shut gcc up
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000821 Bool is_prior_definite;
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000822
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000823 while (lc_pop(&top)) {
tom1d0f3f62010-10-04 20:55:21 +0000824 tl_assert(top >= 0 && top < lc_n_chunks);
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000825
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000826 // See comment about 'is_prior_definite' at the top to understand this.
827 is_prior_definite = ( Possible != lc_extras[top].state );
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000828
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000829 lc_scan_memory(lc_chunks[top]->data, lc_chunks[top]->szB,
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +0000830 is_prior_definite, clique, (clique == -1 ? -1 : top),
831 /*searched*/ 0, 0);
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000832 }
833}
834
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +0000835static Word cmp_LossRecordKey_LossRecord(const void* key, const void* elem)
836{
florian3e798632012-11-24 19:41:54 +0000837 const LossRecordKey* a = key;
838 const LossRecordKey* b = &(((const LossRecord*)elem)->key);
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +0000839
840 // Compare on states first because that's fast.
841 if (a->state < b->state) return -1;
842 if (a->state > b->state) return 1;
843 // Ok, the states are equal. Now compare the locations, which is slower.
844 if (VG_(eq_ExeContext)(
845 MC_(clo_leak_resolution), a->allocated_at, b->allocated_at))
846 return 0;
847 // Different locations. Ordering is arbitrary, just use the ec pointer.
848 if (a->allocated_at < b->allocated_at) return -1;
849 if (a->allocated_at > b->allocated_at) return 1;
850 VG_(tool_panic)("bad LossRecord comparison");
851}
852
florian6bd9dc12012-11-23 16:17:43 +0000853static Int cmp_LossRecords(const void* va, const void* vb)
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +0000854{
florian3e798632012-11-24 19:41:54 +0000855 const LossRecord* lr_a = *(const LossRecord *const *)va;
856 const LossRecord* lr_b = *(const LossRecord *const *)vb;
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +0000857 SizeT total_szB_a = lr_a->szB + lr_a->indirect_szB;
858 SizeT total_szB_b = lr_b->szB + lr_b->indirect_szB;
859
860 // First compare by sizes.
861 if (total_szB_a < total_szB_b) return -1;
862 if (total_szB_a > total_szB_b) return 1;
863 // If size are equal, compare by states.
864 if (lr_a->key.state < lr_b->key.state) return -1;
865 if (lr_a->key.state > lr_b->key.state) return 1;
njne10c7f82009-05-06 06:52:47 +0000866 // If they're still equal here, it doesn't matter that much, but we keep
867 // comparing other things so that regtests are as deterministic as
868 // possible. So: compare num_blocks.
869 if (lr_a->num_blocks < lr_b->num_blocks) return -1;
870 if (lr_a->num_blocks > lr_b->num_blocks) return 1;
871 // Finally, compare ExeContext addresses... older ones are likely to have
872 // lower addresses.
873 if (lr_a->key.allocated_at < lr_b->key.allocated_at) return -1;
874 if (lr_a->key.allocated_at > lr_b->key.allocated_at) return 1;
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +0000875 return 0;
876}
877
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +0000878// allocates or reallocates lr_array, and set its elements to the loss records
879// contains in lr_table.
880static Int get_lr_array_from_lr_table(void) {
881 Int i, n_lossrecords;
882 LossRecord* lr;
883
884 n_lossrecords = VG_(OSetGen_Size)(lr_table);
885
886 // (re-)create the array of pointers to the loss records.
887 // lr_array is kept to allow producing the block list from gdbserver.
888 if (lr_array != NULL)
889 VG_(free)(lr_array);
890 lr_array = VG_(malloc)("mc.pr.2", n_lossrecords * sizeof(LossRecord*));
891 i = 0;
892 VG_(OSetGen_ResetIter)(lr_table);
893 while ( (lr = VG_(OSetGen_Next)(lr_table)) ) {
894 lr_array[i++] = lr;
895 }
896 tl_assert(i == n_lossrecords);
897 return n_lossrecords;
898}
899
philippe84234902012-01-14 13:53:13 +0000900
901static void get_printing_rules(LeakCheckParams* lcp,
902 LossRecord* lr,
903 Bool* count_as_error,
904 Bool* print_record)
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000905{
philippe84234902012-01-14 13:53:13 +0000906 // Rules for printing:
907 // - We don't show suppressed loss records ever (and that's controlled
908 // within the error manager).
909 // - We show non-suppressed loss records that are not "reachable" if
910 // --leak-check=yes.
911 // - We show all non-suppressed loss records if --leak-check=yes and
912 // --show-reachable=yes.
913 //
914 // Nb: here "reachable" means Reachable *or* IndirectLeak; note that
915 // this is different to "still reachable" used elsewhere because it
916 // includes indirectly lost blocks!
917
918 Bool delta_considered;
919
920 switch (lcp->deltamode) {
921 case LCD_Any:
922 delta_considered = lr->num_blocks > 0;
923 break;
924 case LCD_Increased:
925 delta_considered
926 = lr->szB > lr->old_szB
927 || lr->indirect_szB > lr->old_indirect_szB
928 || lr->num_blocks > lr->old_num_blocks;
929 break;
930 case LCD_Changed:
931 delta_considered = lr->szB != lr->old_szB
932 || lr->indirect_szB != lr->old_indirect_szB
933 || lr->num_blocks != lr->old_num_blocks;
934 break;
935 default:
936 tl_assert(0);
937 }
938
939 *print_record = lcp->mode == LC_Full && delta_considered &&
940 ( lcp->show_reachable ||
941 Unreached == lr->key.state ||
942 ( lcp->show_possibly_lost &&
943 Possible == lr->key.state ) );
944 // We don't count a leaks as errors with lcp->mode==LC_Summary.
945 // Otherwise you can get high error counts with few or no error
946 // messages, which can be confusing. Also, you could argue that
947 // indirect leaks should be counted as errors, but it seems better to
948 // make the counting criteria similar to the printing criteria. So we
949 // don't count them.
950 *count_as_error = lcp->mode == LC_Full && delta_considered &&
951 ( Unreached == lr->key.state ||
952 Possible == lr->key.state );
953}
954
955static void print_results(ThreadId tid, LeakCheckParams* lcp)
956{
957 Int i, n_lossrecords, start_lr_output_scan;
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +0000958 LossRecord* lr;
959 Bool is_suppressed;
sewardjc8bd1df2011-06-26 12:41:33 +0000960 SizeT old_bytes_leaked = MC_(bytes_leaked); /* to report delta in summary */
961 SizeT old_bytes_indirect = MC_(bytes_indirect);
962 SizeT old_bytes_dubious = MC_(bytes_dubious);
963 SizeT old_bytes_reachable = MC_(bytes_reachable);
964 SizeT old_bytes_suppressed = MC_(bytes_suppressed);
965 SizeT old_blocks_leaked = MC_(blocks_leaked);
966 SizeT old_blocks_indirect = MC_(blocks_indirect);
967 SizeT old_blocks_dubious = MC_(blocks_dubious);
968 SizeT old_blocks_reachable = MC_(blocks_reachable);
969 SizeT old_blocks_suppressed = MC_(blocks_suppressed);
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000970
sewardjc8bd1df2011-06-26 12:41:33 +0000971 if (lr_table == NULL)
972 // Create the lr_table, which holds the loss records.
973 // If the lr_table already exists, it means it contains
974 // loss_records from the previous leak search. The old_*
975 // values in these records are used to implement the
976 // leak check delta mode
977 lr_table =
978 VG_(OSetGen_Create)(offsetof(LossRecord, key),
979 cmp_LossRecordKey_LossRecord,
980 VG_(malloc), "mc.pr.1",
981 VG_(free));
982
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +0000983 // If we have loss records from a previous search, reset values to have
984 // proper printing of the deltas between previous search and this search.
985 n_lossrecords = get_lr_array_from_lr_table();
986 for (i = 0; i < n_lossrecords; i++) {
philippe4bbfc5f2012-02-27 21:52:45 +0000987 if (lr_array[i]->num_blocks == 0) {
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +0000988 // remove from lr_table the old loss_records with 0 bytes found
989 VG_(OSetGen_Remove) (lr_table, &lr_array[i]->key);
philippe4bbfc5f2012-02-27 21:52:45 +0000990 VG_(OSetGen_FreeNode)(lr_table, lr_array[i]);
991 } else {
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +0000992 // move the leak sizes to old_* and zero the current sizes
993 // for next leak search
994 lr_array[i]->old_szB = lr_array[i]->szB;
995 lr_array[i]->old_indirect_szB = lr_array[i]->indirect_szB;
996 lr_array[i]->old_num_blocks = lr_array[i]->num_blocks;
997 lr_array[i]->szB = 0;
998 lr_array[i]->indirect_szB = 0;
999 lr_array[i]->num_blocks = 0;
1000 }
1001 }
1002 // lr_array now contains "invalid" loss records => free it.
1003 // lr_array will be re-created below with the kept and new loss records.
1004 VG_(free) (lr_array);
1005 lr_array = NULL;
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +00001006
1007 // Convert the chunks into loss records, merging them where appropriate.
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001008 for (i = 0; i < lc_n_chunks; i++) {
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +00001009 MC_Chunk* ch = lc_chunks[i];
1010 LC_Extra* ex = &(lc_extras)[i];
1011 LossRecord* old_lr;
1012 LossRecordKey lrkey;
1013 lrkey.state = ex->state;
1014 lrkey.allocated_at = ch->where;
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +00001015
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +00001016 old_lr = VG_(OSetGen_Lookup)(lr_table, &lrkey);
1017 if (old_lr) {
1018 // We found an existing loss record matching this chunk. Update the
1019 // loss record's details in-situ. This is safe because we don't
1020 // change the elements used as the OSet key.
1021 old_lr->szB += ch->szB;
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +00001022 if (ex->state == Unreached)
1023 old_lr->indirect_szB += ex->IorC.indirect_szB;
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +00001024 old_lr->num_blocks++;
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +00001025 } else {
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +00001026 // No existing loss record matches this chunk. Create a new loss
1027 // record, initialise it from the chunk, and insert it into lr_table.
1028 lr = VG_(OSetGen_AllocNode)(lr_table, sizeof(LossRecord));
1029 lr->key = lrkey;
1030 lr->szB = ch->szB;
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +00001031 if (ex->state == Unreached)
1032 lr->indirect_szB = ex->IorC.indirect_szB;
1033 else
1034 lr->indirect_szB = 0;
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +00001035 lr->num_blocks = 1;
sewardjc8bd1df2011-06-26 12:41:33 +00001036 lr->old_szB = 0;
1037 lr->old_indirect_szB = 0;
1038 lr->old_num_blocks = 0;
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +00001039 VG_(OSetGen_Insert)(lr_table, lr);
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +00001040 }
1041 }
1042
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +00001043 // (re-)create the array of pointers to the (new) loss records.
1044 n_lossrecords = get_lr_array_from_lr_table ();
1045 tl_assert(VG_(OSetGen_Size)(lr_table) == n_lossrecords);
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +00001046
1047 // Sort the array by loss record sizes.
1048 VG_(ssort)(lr_array, n_lossrecords, sizeof(LossRecord*),
1049 cmp_LossRecords);
1050
1051 // Zero totals.
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001052 MC_(blocks_leaked) = MC_(bytes_leaked) = 0;
1053 MC_(blocks_indirect) = MC_(bytes_indirect) = 0;
1054 MC_(blocks_dubious) = MC_(bytes_dubious) = 0;
1055 MC_(blocks_reachable) = MC_(bytes_reachable) = 0;
1056 MC_(blocks_suppressed) = MC_(bytes_suppressed) = 0;
1057
philippe84234902012-01-14 13:53:13 +00001058 // If there is a maximum nr of loss records we can output, then first
1059 // compute from where the output scan has to start.
1060 // By default, start from the first loss record. Compute a higher
1061 // value if there is a maximum to respect. We need to print the last
1062 // records, as the one with the biggest sizes are more interesting.
1063 start_lr_output_scan = 0;
1064 if (lcp->mode == LC_Full && lcp->max_loss_records_output < n_lossrecords) {
1065 Int nr_printable_records = 0;
1066 for (i = n_lossrecords - 1; i >= 0 && start_lr_output_scan == 0; i--) {
1067 Bool count_as_error, print_record;
1068 lr = lr_array[i];
1069 get_printing_rules (lcp, lr, &count_as_error, &print_record);
1070 // Do not use get_printing_rules results for is_suppressed, as we
1071 // only want to check if the record would be suppressed.
1072 is_suppressed =
1073 MC_(record_leak_error) ( tid, i+1, n_lossrecords, lr,
1074 False /* print_record */,
1075 False /* count_as_error */);
1076 if (print_record && !is_suppressed) {
1077 nr_printable_records++;
1078 if (nr_printable_records == lcp->max_loss_records_output)
1079 start_lr_output_scan = i;
1080 }
sewardjc8bd1df2011-06-26 12:41:33 +00001081 }
philippe84234902012-01-14 13:53:13 +00001082 }
sewardjc8bd1df2011-06-26 12:41:33 +00001083
philippe84234902012-01-14 13:53:13 +00001084 // Print the loss records (in size order) and collect summary stats.
1085 for (i = start_lr_output_scan; i < n_lossrecords; i++) {
1086 Bool count_as_error, print_record;
1087 lr = lr_array[i];
1088 get_printing_rules(lcp, lr, &count_as_error, &print_record);
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +00001089 is_suppressed =
njn18afe5d2009-08-10 08:25:39 +00001090 MC_(record_leak_error) ( tid, i+1, n_lossrecords, lr, print_record,
1091 count_as_error );
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +00001092
1093 if (is_suppressed) {
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +00001094 MC_(blocks_suppressed) += lr->num_blocks;
1095 MC_(bytes_suppressed) += lr->szB;
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +00001096
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +00001097 } else if (Unreached == lr->key.state) {
1098 MC_(blocks_leaked) += lr->num_blocks;
1099 MC_(bytes_leaked) += lr->szB;
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +00001100
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +00001101 } else if (IndirectLeak == lr->key.state) {
1102 MC_(blocks_indirect) += lr->num_blocks;
1103 MC_(bytes_indirect) += lr->szB;
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +00001104
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +00001105 } else if (Possible == lr->key.state) {
1106 MC_(blocks_dubious) += lr->num_blocks;
1107 MC_(bytes_dubious) += lr->szB;
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +00001108
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +00001109 } else if (Reachable == lr->key.state) {
1110 MC_(blocks_reachable) += lr->num_blocks;
1111 MC_(bytes_reachable) += lr->szB;
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +00001112
1113 } else {
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001114 VG_(tool_panic)("unknown loss mode");
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +00001115 }
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +00001116 }
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +00001117
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001118 if (VG_(clo_verbosity) > 0 && !VG_(clo_xml)) {
florian19f91bb2012-11-10 22:29:54 +00001119 HChar d_bytes[20];
1120 HChar d_blocks[20];
sewardjc8bd1df2011-06-26 12:41:33 +00001121
sewardj6b523cd2009-07-15 14:49:40 +00001122 VG_(umsg)("LEAK SUMMARY:\n");
sewardjc8bd1df2011-06-26 12:41:33 +00001123 VG_(umsg)(" definitely lost: %'lu%s bytes in %'lu%s blocks\n",
1124 MC_(bytes_leaked),
philippe84234902012-01-14 13:53:13 +00001125 MC_(snprintf_delta) (d_bytes, 20, MC_(bytes_leaked), old_bytes_leaked, lcp->deltamode),
sewardjc8bd1df2011-06-26 12:41:33 +00001126 MC_(blocks_leaked),
philippe84234902012-01-14 13:53:13 +00001127 MC_(snprintf_delta) (d_blocks, 20, MC_(blocks_leaked), old_blocks_leaked, lcp->deltamode));
sewardjc8bd1df2011-06-26 12:41:33 +00001128 VG_(umsg)(" indirectly lost: %'lu%s bytes in %'lu%s blocks\n",
1129 MC_(bytes_indirect),
philippe84234902012-01-14 13:53:13 +00001130 MC_(snprintf_delta) (d_bytes, 20, MC_(bytes_indirect), old_bytes_indirect, lcp->deltamode),
sewardjc8bd1df2011-06-26 12:41:33 +00001131 MC_(blocks_indirect),
philippe84234902012-01-14 13:53:13 +00001132 MC_(snprintf_delta) (d_blocks, 20, MC_(blocks_indirect), old_blocks_indirect, lcp->deltamode) );
sewardjc8bd1df2011-06-26 12:41:33 +00001133 VG_(umsg)(" possibly lost: %'lu%s bytes in %'lu%s blocks\n",
1134 MC_(bytes_dubious),
philippe84234902012-01-14 13:53:13 +00001135 MC_(snprintf_delta) (d_bytes, 20, MC_(bytes_dubious), old_bytes_dubious, lcp->deltamode),
sewardjc8bd1df2011-06-26 12:41:33 +00001136 MC_(blocks_dubious),
philippe84234902012-01-14 13:53:13 +00001137 MC_(snprintf_delta) (d_blocks, 20, MC_(blocks_dubious), old_blocks_dubious, lcp->deltamode) );
sewardjc8bd1df2011-06-26 12:41:33 +00001138 VG_(umsg)(" still reachable: %'lu%s bytes in %'lu%s blocks\n",
1139 MC_(bytes_reachable),
philippe84234902012-01-14 13:53:13 +00001140 MC_(snprintf_delta) (d_bytes, 20, MC_(bytes_reachable), old_bytes_reachable, lcp->deltamode),
sewardjc8bd1df2011-06-26 12:41:33 +00001141 MC_(blocks_reachable),
philippe84234902012-01-14 13:53:13 +00001142 MC_(snprintf_delta) (d_blocks, 20, MC_(blocks_reachable), old_blocks_reachable, lcp->deltamode) );
sewardjc8bd1df2011-06-26 12:41:33 +00001143 VG_(umsg)(" suppressed: %'lu%s bytes in %'lu%s blocks\n",
1144 MC_(bytes_suppressed),
philippe84234902012-01-14 13:53:13 +00001145 MC_(snprintf_delta) (d_bytes, 20, MC_(bytes_suppressed), old_bytes_suppressed, lcp->deltamode),
sewardjc8bd1df2011-06-26 12:41:33 +00001146 MC_(blocks_suppressed),
philippe84234902012-01-14 13:53:13 +00001147 MC_(snprintf_delta) (d_blocks, 20, MC_(blocks_suppressed), old_blocks_suppressed, lcp->deltamode) );
1148 if (lcp->mode != LC_Full &&
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001149 (MC_(blocks_leaked) + MC_(blocks_indirect) +
1150 MC_(blocks_dubious) + MC_(blocks_reachable)) > 0) {
philippe84234902012-01-14 13:53:13 +00001151 if (lcp->requested_by_monitor_command)
sewardj30b3eca2011-06-28 08:20:39 +00001152 VG_(umsg)("To see details of leaked memory, give 'full' arg to leak_check\n");
sewardjc8bd1df2011-06-26 12:41:33 +00001153 else
1154 VG_(umsg)("Rerun with --leak-check=full to see details "
1155 "of leaked memory\n");
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001156 }
philippe84234902012-01-14 13:53:13 +00001157 if (lcp->mode == LC_Full &&
1158 MC_(blocks_reachable) > 0 && !lcp->show_reachable)
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001159 {
sewardj6b523cd2009-07-15 14:49:40 +00001160 VG_(umsg)("Reachable blocks (those to which a pointer "
1161 "was found) are not shown.\n");
philippe84234902012-01-14 13:53:13 +00001162 if (lcp->requested_by_monitor_command)
sewardj30b3eca2011-06-28 08:20:39 +00001163 VG_(umsg)("To see them, add 'reachable any' args to leak_check\n");
sewardjc8bd1df2011-06-26 12:41:33 +00001164 else
1165 VG_(umsg)("To see them, rerun with: --leak-check=full "
1166 "--show-reachable=yes\n");
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +00001167 }
njnb6267bd2009-08-12 00:14:16 +00001168 VG_(umsg)("\n");
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +00001169 }
1170}
1171
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +00001172// print recursively all indirectly leaked blocks collected in clique.
1173static void print_clique (Int clique, UInt level)
1174{
1175 Int ind;
1176 Int i, n_lossrecords;;
1177
1178 n_lossrecords = VG_(OSetGen_Size)(lr_table);
1179
1180 for (ind = 0; ind < lc_n_chunks; ind++) {
1181 LC_Extra* ind_ex = &(lc_extras)[ind];
1182 if (ind_ex->state == IndirectLeak && ind_ex->IorC.clique == (SizeT) clique) {
1183 MC_Chunk* ind_ch = lc_chunks[ind];
1184 LossRecord* ind_lr;
1185 LossRecordKey ind_lrkey;
1186 Int lr_i;
1187 ind_lrkey.state = ind_ex->state;
1188 ind_lrkey.allocated_at = ind_ch->where;
1189 ind_lr = VG_(OSetGen_Lookup)(lr_table, &ind_lrkey);
1190 for (lr_i = 0; lr_i < n_lossrecords; lr_i++)
1191 if (ind_lr == lr_array[lr_i])
1192 break;
1193 for (i = 0; i < level; i++)
1194 VG_(umsg)(" ");
1195 VG_(umsg)("%p[%lu] indirect loss record %d\n",
1196 (void *)ind_ch->data, (unsigned long)ind_ch->szB,
1197 lr_i+1); // lr_i+1 for user numbering.
1198 if (lr_i >= n_lossrecords)
1199 VG_(umsg)
1200 ("error: no indirect loss record found for %p[%lu]?????\n",
1201 (void *)ind_ch->data, (unsigned long)ind_ch->szB);
1202 print_clique(ind, level+1);
1203 }
1204 }
1205 }
1206
1207Bool MC_(print_block_list) ( UInt loss_record_nr)
1208{
1209 Int i, n_lossrecords;
1210 LossRecord* lr;
1211
1212 if (lr_table == NULL || lc_chunks == NULL || lc_extras == NULL) {
1213 VG_(umsg)("Can't print block list : no valid leak search result\n");
1214 return False;
1215 }
1216
1217 if (lc_chunks_n_frees_marker != MC_(get_cmalloc_n_frees)()) {
1218 VG_(umsg)("Can't print obsolete block list : redo a leak search first\n");
1219 return False;
1220 }
1221
1222 n_lossrecords = VG_(OSetGen_Size)(lr_table);
1223 if (loss_record_nr >= n_lossrecords)
1224 return False; // Invalid loss record nr.
1225
1226 tl_assert (lr_array);
1227 lr = lr_array[loss_record_nr];
1228
1229 // (re-)print the loss record details.
1230 // (+1 on loss_record_nr as user numbering for loss records starts at 1).
1231 MC_(pp_LossRecord)(loss_record_nr+1, n_lossrecords, lr);
1232
1233 // Match the chunks with loss records.
1234 for (i = 0; i < lc_n_chunks; i++) {
1235 MC_Chunk* ch = lc_chunks[i];
1236 LC_Extra* ex = &(lc_extras)[i];
1237 LossRecord* old_lr;
1238 LossRecordKey lrkey;
1239 lrkey.state = ex->state;
1240 lrkey.allocated_at = ch->where;
1241
1242 old_lr = VG_(OSetGen_Lookup)(lr_table, &lrkey);
1243 if (old_lr) {
1244 // We found an existing loss record matching this chunk.
1245 // If this is the loss record we are looking for, then output the pointer.
1246 if (old_lr == lr_array[loss_record_nr]) {
1247 VG_(umsg)("%p[%lu]\n",
1248 (void *)ch->data, (unsigned long) ch->szB);
1249 if (ex->state != Reachable) {
1250 // We can print the clique in all states, except Reachable.
1251 // In Unreached state, lc_chunk[i] is the clique leader.
1252 // In IndirectLeak, lc_chunk[i] might have been a clique leader
1253 // which was later collected in another clique.
1254 // For Possible, lc_chunk[i] might be the top of a clique
1255 // or an intermediate clique.
1256 print_clique(i, 1);
1257 }
1258 }
1259 } else {
1260 // No existing loss record matches this chunk ???
1261 VG_(umsg)("error: no loss record found for %p[%lu]?????\n",
1262 (void *)ch->data, (unsigned long) ch->szB);
1263 }
1264 }
1265 return True;
1266}
1267
1268// If searched = 0, scan memory root set, pushing onto the mark stack the blocks
1269// encountered.
1270// Otherwise (searched != 0), scan the memory root set searching for ptr pointing
1271// inside [searched, searched+szB[.
1272static void scan_memory_root_set(Addr searched, SizeT szB)
1273{
1274 Int i;
1275 Int n_seg_starts;
1276 Addr* seg_starts = VG_(get_segment_starts)( &n_seg_starts );
1277
1278 tl_assert(seg_starts && n_seg_starts > 0);
1279
1280 lc_scanned_szB = 0;
1281
1282 // VG_(am_show_nsegments)( 0, "leakcheck");
1283 for (i = 0; i < n_seg_starts; i++) {
1284 SizeT seg_size;
1285 NSegment const* seg = VG_(am_find_nsegment)( seg_starts[i] );
1286 tl_assert(seg);
1287
1288 if (seg->kind != SkFileC && seg->kind != SkAnonC) continue;
1289 if (!(seg->hasR && seg->hasW)) continue;
1290 if (seg->isCH) continue;
1291
1292 // Don't poke around in device segments as this may cause
1293 // hangs. Exclude /dev/zero just in case someone allocated
1294 // memory by explicitly mapping /dev/zero.
1295 if (seg->kind == SkFileC
1296 && (VKI_S_ISCHR(seg->mode) || VKI_S_ISBLK(seg->mode))) {
florian3e798632012-11-24 19:41:54 +00001297 HChar* dev_name = VG_(am_get_filename)( seg );
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +00001298 if (dev_name && 0 == VG_(strcmp)(dev_name, "/dev/zero")) {
1299 // Don't skip /dev/zero.
1300 } else {
1301 // Skip this device mapping.
1302 continue;
1303 }
1304 }
1305
1306 if (0)
1307 VG_(printf)("ACCEPT %2d %#lx %#lx\n", i, seg->start, seg->end);
1308
1309 // Scan the segment. We use -1 for the clique number, because this
1310 // is a root-set.
1311 seg_size = seg->end - seg->start + 1;
1312 if (VG_(clo_verbosity) > 2) {
1313 VG_(message)(Vg_DebugMsg,
1314 " Scanning root segment: %#lx..%#lx (%lu)\n",
1315 seg->start, seg->end, seg_size);
1316 }
1317 lc_scan_memory(seg->start, seg_size, /*is_prior_definite*/True,
1318 /*clique*/-1, /*cur_clique*/-1,
1319 searched, szB);
1320 }
philippe7d69fd92012-02-26 21:26:00 +00001321 VG_(free)(seg_starts);
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +00001322}
1323
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001324/*------------------------------------------------------------*/
1325/*--- Top-level entry point. ---*/
1326/*------------------------------------------------------------*/
sewardj3cf26a52006-07-27 23:48:53 +00001327
philippe84234902012-01-14 13:53:13 +00001328void MC_(detect_memory_leaks) ( ThreadId tid, LeakCheckParams* lcp)
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +00001329{
njnb965efb2009-08-10 07:36:54 +00001330 Int i, j;
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +00001331
philippe84234902012-01-14 13:53:13 +00001332 tl_assert(lcp->mode != LC_Off);
sewardjc8bd1df2011-06-26 12:41:33 +00001333
philippe57a16a22012-07-18 22:26:51 +00001334 // Verify some assertions which are used in lc_scan_memory.
1335 tl_assert((VKI_PAGE_SIZE % sizeof(Addr)) == 0);
1336 tl_assert((SM_SIZE % sizeof(Addr)) == 0);
1337 // Above two assertions are critical, while below assertion
1338 // ensures that the optimisation in the loop is done in the
1339 // correct order : the loop checks for (big) SM chunk skipping
1340 // before checking for (smaller) page skipping.
1341 tl_assert((SM_SIZE % VKI_PAGE_SIZE) == 0);
1342
1343
philippe84234902012-01-14 13:53:13 +00001344 MC_(detect_memory_leaks_last_delta_mode) = lcp->deltamode;
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +00001345
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001346 // Get the chunks, stop if there were none.
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +00001347 if (lc_chunks) {
1348 VG_(free)(lc_chunks);
1349 lc_chunks = NULL;
1350 }
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001351 lc_chunks = find_active_chunks(&lc_n_chunks);
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +00001352 lc_chunks_n_frees_marker = MC_(get_cmalloc_n_frees)();
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001353 if (lc_n_chunks == 0) {
1354 tl_assert(lc_chunks == NULL);
sewardjc8bd1df2011-06-26 12:41:33 +00001355 if (lr_table != NULL) {
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +00001356 // forget the previous recorded LossRecords as next leak search
1357 // can in any case just create new leaks.
sewardjc8bd1df2011-06-26 12:41:33 +00001358 // Maybe it would be better to rather call print_result ?
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +00001359 // (at least when leak decreases are requested)
sewardjc8bd1df2011-06-26 12:41:33 +00001360 // This will then output all LossRecords with a size decreasing to 0
1361 VG_(OSetGen_Destroy) (lr_table);
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +00001362 lr_table = NULL;
sewardjc8bd1df2011-06-26 12:41:33 +00001363 }
sewardj71bc3cb2005-05-19 00:25:45 +00001364 if (VG_(clo_verbosity) >= 1 && !VG_(clo_xml)) {
njnb6267bd2009-08-12 00:14:16 +00001365 VG_(umsg)("All heap blocks were freed -- no leaks are possible\n");
sewardj2d9e8742009-08-07 15:46:56 +00001366 VG_(umsg)("\n");
sewardj37d06f22003-09-17 21:48:26 +00001367 }
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +00001368 return;
1369 }
1370
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001371 // Sort the array so blocks are in ascending order in memory.
1372 VG_(ssort)(lc_chunks, lc_n_chunks, sizeof(VgHashNode*), compare_MC_Chunks);
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +00001373
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001374 // Sanity check -- make sure they're in order.
1375 for (i = 0; i < lc_n_chunks-1; i++) {
1376 tl_assert( lc_chunks[i]->data <= lc_chunks[i+1]->data);
1377 }
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +00001378
njnb965efb2009-08-10 07:36:54 +00001379 // Sanity check -- make sure they don't overlap. The one exception is that
1380 // we allow a MALLOCLIKE block to sit entirely within a malloc() block.
1381 // This is for bug 100628. If this occurs, we ignore the malloc() block
1382 // for leak-checking purposes. This is a hack and probably should be done
1383 // better, but at least it's consistent with mempools (which are treated
1384 // like this in find_active_chunks). Mempools have a separate VgHashTable
1385 // for mempool chunks, but if custom-allocated blocks are put in a separate
1386 // table from normal heap blocks it makes free-mismatch checking more
1387 // difficult.
1388 //
1389 // If this check fails, it probably means that the application
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001390 // has done something stupid with VALGRIND_MALLOCLIKE_BLOCK client
njnb965efb2009-08-10 07:36:54 +00001391 // requests, eg. has made overlapping requests (which are
1392 // nonsensical), or used VALGRIND_MALLOCLIKE_BLOCK for stack locations;
1393 // again nonsensical.
1394 //
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001395 for (i = 0; i < lc_n_chunks-1; i++) {
1396 MC_Chunk* ch1 = lc_chunks[i];
1397 MC_Chunk* ch2 = lc_chunks[i+1];
njnb965efb2009-08-10 07:36:54 +00001398
1399 Addr start1 = ch1->data;
1400 Addr start2 = ch2->data;
1401 Addr end1 = ch1->data + ch1->szB - 1;
1402 Addr end2 = ch2->data + ch2->szB - 1;
1403 Bool isCustom1 = ch1->allockind == MC_AllocCustom;
1404 Bool isCustom2 = ch2->allockind == MC_AllocCustom;
1405
1406 if (end1 < start2) {
1407 // Normal case - no overlap.
1408
1409 // We used to allow exact duplicates, I'm not sure why. --njn
1410 //} else if (start1 == start2 && end1 == end2) {
1411 // Degenerate case: exact duplicates.
1412
1413 } else if (start1 >= start2 && end1 <= end2 && isCustom1 && !isCustom2) {
1414 // Block i is MALLOCLIKE and entirely within block i+1.
1415 // Remove block i+1.
1416 for (j = i+1; j < lc_n_chunks-1; j++) {
1417 lc_chunks[j] = lc_chunks[j+1];
1418 }
1419 lc_n_chunks--;
1420
1421 } else if (start2 >= start1 && end2 <= end1 && isCustom2 && !isCustom1) {
1422 // Block i+1 is MALLOCLIKE and entirely within block i.
1423 // Remove block i.
1424 for (j = i; j < lc_n_chunks-1; j++) {
1425 lc_chunks[j] = lc_chunks[j+1];
1426 }
1427 lc_n_chunks--;
1428
1429 } else {
philippe09007e32012-03-01 22:00:36 +00001430 VG_(umsg)("Block 0x%lx..0x%lx overlaps with block 0x%lx..0x%lx\n",
bart3c4fa9f2011-05-09 10:46:55 +00001431 start1, end1, start2, end2);
philippe09007e32012-03-01 22:00:36 +00001432 VG_(umsg)("Blocks allocation contexts:\n"),
1433 VG_(pp_ExeContext)( ch1->where);
1434 VG_(umsg)("\n"),
1435 VG_(pp_ExeContext)( ch2->where);
njnb965efb2009-08-10 07:36:54 +00001436 VG_(umsg)("This is usually caused by using VALGRIND_MALLOCLIKE_BLOCK");
philippe09007e32012-03-01 22:00:36 +00001437 VG_(umsg)("in an inappropriate way.\n");
njnb965efb2009-08-10 07:36:54 +00001438 tl_assert (0);
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001439 }
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001440 }
1441
1442 // Initialise lc_extras.
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +00001443 if (lc_extras) {
1444 VG_(free)(lc_extras);
1445 lc_extras = NULL;
1446 }
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001447 lc_extras = VG_(malloc)( "mc.dml.2", lc_n_chunks * sizeof(LC_Extra) );
1448 for (i = 0; i < lc_n_chunks; i++) {
1449 lc_extras[i].state = Unreached;
tom1d0f3f62010-10-04 20:55:21 +00001450 lc_extras[i].pending = False;
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +00001451 lc_extras[i].IorC.indirect_szB = 0;
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001452 }
1453
1454 // Initialise lc_markstack.
1455 lc_markstack = VG_(malloc)( "mc.dml.2", lc_n_chunks * sizeof(Int) );
1456 for (i = 0; i < lc_n_chunks; i++) {
1457 lc_markstack[i] = -1;
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +00001458 }
1459 lc_markstack_top = -1;
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +00001460
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001461 // Verbosity.
sewardj2d9e8742009-08-07 15:46:56 +00001462 if (VG_(clo_verbosity) > 1 && !VG_(clo_xml)) {
njnb6267bd2009-08-12 00:14:16 +00001463 VG_(umsg)( "Searching for pointers to %'d not-freed blocks\n",
sewardj6b523cd2009-07-15 14:49:40 +00001464 lc_n_chunks );
sewardj2d9e8742009-08-07 15:46:56 +00001465 }
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +00001466
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001467 // Scan the memory root-set, pushing onto the mark stack any blocks
1468 // pointed to.
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +00001469 scan_memory_root_set(/*searched*/0, 0);
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +00001470
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001471 // Scan GP registers for chunk pointers.
1472 VG_(apply_to_GP_regs)(lc_push_if_a_chunk_ptr_register);
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +00001473
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001474 // Process the pushed blocks. After this, every block that is reachable
1475 // from the root-set has been traced.
1476 lc_process_markstack(/*clique*/-1);
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +00001477
njnb6267bd2009-08-12 00:14:16 +00001478 if (VG_(clo_verbosity) > 1 && !VG_(clo_xml)) {
1479 VG_(umsg)("Checked %'lu bytes\n", lc_scanned_szB);
1480 VG_(umsg)( "\n" );
1481 }
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +00001482
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001483 // Trace all the leaked blocks to determine which are directly leaked and
1484 // which are indirectly leaked. For each Unreached block, push it onto
1485 // the mark stack, and find all the as-yet-Unreached blocks reachable
1486 // from it. These form a clique and are marked IndirectLeak, and their
1487 // size is added to the clique leader's indirect size. If one of the
1488 // found blocks was itself a clique leader (from a previous clique), then
1489 // the cliques are merged.
1490 for (i = 0; i < lc_n_chunks; i++) {
1491 MC_Chunk* ch = lc_chunks[i];
1492 LC_Extra* ex = &(lc_extras[i]);
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +00001493
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001494 if (VG_DEBUG_CLIQUE)
1495 VG_(printf)("cliques: %d at %#lx -> Loss state %d\n",
1496 i, ch->data, ex->state);
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +00001497
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001498 tl_assert(lc_markstack_top == -1);
1499
1500 if (ex->state == Unreached) {
1501 if (VG_DEBUG_CLIQUE)
1502 VG_(printf)("%d: gathering clique %#lx\n", i, ch->data);
1503
1504 // Push this Unreached block onto the stack and process it.
1505 lc_push(i, ch);
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +00001506 lc_process_markstack(/*clique*/i);
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001507
1508 tl_assert(lc_markstack_top == -1);
1509 tl_assert(ex->state == Unreached);
nethercote0f19bce2003-12-02 10:17:44 +00001510 }
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +00001511 }
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001512
sewardjc8bd1df2011-06-26 12:41:33 +00001513 print_results( tid, lcp);
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +00001514
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +00001515 VG_(free) ( lc_markstack );
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +00001516 lc_markstack = NULL;
1517 // lc_chunks, lc_extras, lr_array and lr_table are kept (needed if user
1518 // calls MC_(print_block_list)). lr_table also used for delta leak reporting
1519 // between this leak search and the next leak search.
1520}
1521
1522static Addr searched_wpa;
1523static SizeT searched_szB;
1524static void
florian6bd9dc12012-11-23 16:17:43 +00001525search_address_in_GP_reg(ThreadId tid, const HChar* regname, Addr addr_in_reg)
philippea22f59d2012-01-26 23:13:52 +00001526{
1527 if (addr_in_reg >= searched_wpa
1528 && addr_in_reg < searched_wpa + searched_szB) {
1529 if (addr_in_reg == searched_wpa)
1530 VG_(umsg)
1531 ("tid %d register %s pointing at %#lx\n",
1532 tid, regname, searched_wpa);
1533 else
1534 VG_(umsg)
1535 ("tid %d register %s interior pointing %lu bytes inside %#lx\n",
1536 tid, regname, (long unsigned) addr_in_reg - searched_wpa,
1537 searched_wpa);
1538 }
1539}
1540
1541void MC_(who_points_at) ( Addr address, SizeT szB)
1542{
1543 MC_Chunk** chunks;
1544 Int n_chunks;
1545 Int i;
1546
1547 if (szB == 1)
1548 VG_(umsg) ("Searching for pointers to %#lx\n", address);
1549 else
1550 VG_(umsg) ("Searching for pointers pointing in %lu bytes from %#lx\n",
1551 szB, address);
1552
1553 // Scan memory root-set, searching for ptr pointing in address[szB]
1554 scan_memory_root_set(address, szB);
1555
1556 // Scan active malloc-ed chunks
1557 chunks = find_active_chunks(&n_chunks);
1558 for (i = 0; i < n_chunks; i++) {
1559 lc_scan_memory(chunks[i]->data, chunks[i]->szB,
1560 /*is_prior_definite*/True,
1561 /*clique*/-1, /*cur_clique*/-1,
1562 address, szB);
1563 }
1564 VG_(free) ( chunks );
1565
1566 // Scan GP registers for pointers to address range.
1567 searched_wpa = address;
1568 searched_szB = szB;
1569 VG_(apply_to_GP_regs)(search_address_in_GP_reg);
1570
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +00001571}
1572
1573/*--------------------------------------------------------------------*/
njn1d0825f2006-03-27 11:37:07 +00001574/*--- end ---*/
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +00001575/*--------------------------------------------------------------------*/
1576