blob: 13b8de398f412d75b5c4f863422c7966a7a7cd61 [file] [log] [blame]
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +00001
2/*--------------------------------------------------------------------*/
njn1d0825f2006-03-27 11:37:07 +00003/*--- The leak checker. mc_leakcheck.c ---*/
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +00004/*--------------------------------------------------------------------*/
5
6/*
nethercote137bc552003-11-14 17:47:54 +00007 This file is part of MemCheck, a heavyweight Valgrind tool for
njn1d0825f2006-03-27 11:37:07 +00008 detecting memory errors.
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +00009
sewardj9eecbbb2010-05-03 21:37:12 +000010 Copyright (C) 2000-2010 Julian Seward
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +000011 jseward@acm.org
12
13 This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
14 modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
15 published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the
16 License, or (at your option) any later version.
17
18 This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but
19 WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
20 MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
21 General Public License for more details.
22
23 You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
24 along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
25 Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA
26 02111-1307, USA.
27
28 The GNU General Public License is contained in the file COPYING.
29*/
30
njnc7561b92005-06-19 01:24:32 +000031#include "pub_tool_basics.h"
sewardj4cfea4f2006-10-14 19:26:10 +000032#include "pub_tool_vki.h"
njnac1e0332009-05-08 00:39:31 +000033#include "pub_tool_aspacehl.h"
njn4802b382005-06-11 04:58:29 +000034#include "pub_tool_aspacemgr.h"
njn1d0825f2006-03-27 11:37:07 +000035#include "pub_tool_execontext.h"
36#include "pub_tool_hashtable.h"
njn97405b22005-06-02 03:39:33 +000037#include "pub_tool_libcbase.h"
njn132bfcc2005-06-04 19:16:06 +000038#include "pub_tool_libcassert.h"
njn36a20fa2005-06-03 03:08:39 +000039#include "pub_tool_libcprint.h"
njnde62cbf2005-06-10 22:08:14 +000040#include "pub_tool_libcsignal.h"
njn6ace3ea2005-06-17 03:06:27 +000041#include "pub_tool_machine.h"
njnc7561b92005-06-19 01:24:32 +000042#include "pub_tool_mallocfree.h"
43#include "pub_tool_options.h"
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +000044#include "pub_tool_oset.h"
njn73c51342005-06-18 15:18:15 +000045#include "pub_tool_signals.h"
njn1d0825f2006-03-27 11:37:07 +000046#include "pub_tool_tooliface.h" // Needed for mc_include.h
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +000047
njn1d0825f2006-03-27 11:37:07 +000048#include "mc_include.h"
njnc7561b92005-06-19 01:24:32 +000049
50#include <setjmp.h> // For jmp_buf
51
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +000052/*------------------------------------------------------------*/
53/*--- An overview of leak checking. ---*/
54/*------------------------------------------------------------*/
njnc7561b92005-06-19 01:24:32 +000055
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +000056// Leak-checking is a directed-graph traversal problem. The graph has
57// two kinds of nodes:
58// - root-set nodes:
59// - GP registers of all threads;
60// - valid, aligned, pointer-sized data words in valid client memory,
61// including stacks, but excluding words within client heap-allocated
62// blocks (they are excluded so that later on we can differentiate
63// between heap blocks that are indirectly leaked vs. directly leaked).
64// - heap-allocated blocks. A block is a mempool chunk or a malloc chunk
65// that doesn't contain a mempool chunk. Nb: the terms "blocks" and
66// "chunks" are used interchangeably below.
67//
68// There are two kinds of edges:
69// - start-pointers, i.e. pointers to the start of a block;
70// - interior-pointers, i.e. pointers to the interior of a block.
71//
72// We use "pointers" rather than "edges" below.
73//
74// Root set nodes only point to blocks. Blocks only point to blocks;
75// a block can point to itself.
76//
77// The aim is to traverse the graph and determine the status of each block.
78//
79// There are 9 distinct cases. See memcheck/docs/mc-manual.xml for details.
80// Presenting all nine categories to the user is probably too much.
81// Currently we do this:
82// - definitely lost: case 3
83// - indirectly lost: case 4, 9
84// - possibly lost: cases 5..8
85// - still reachable: cases 1, 2
86//
87// It's far from clear that this is the best possible categorisation; it's
88// accreted over time without any central guiding principle.
89
90/*------------------------------------------------------------*/
91/*--- XXX: Thoughts for improvement. ---*/
92/*------------------------------------------------------------*/
93
94// From the user's point of view:
95// - If they aren't using interior-pointers, they just have to fix the
96// directly lost blocks, and the indirectly lost ones will be fixed as
97// part of that. Any possibly lost blocks will just be due to random
98// pointer garbage and can be ignored.
99//
100// - If they are using interior-pointers, the fact that they currently are not
101// being told which ones might be directly lost vs. indirectly lost makes
102// it hard to know where to begin.
103//
104// All this makes me wonder if new option is warranted:
105// --follow-interior-pointers. By default it would be off, the leak checker
106// wouldn't follow interior-pointers and there would only be 3 categories:
107// R, DL, IL.
108//
109// If turned on, then it would show 7 categories (R, DL, IL, DR/DL, IR/IL,
110// IR/IL/DL, IL/DL). That output is harder to understand but it's your own
111// damn fault for using interior-pointers...
112//
113// ----
114//
115// Also, why are two blank lines printed between each loss record?
njnc2f8b1b2009-08-10 06:47:00 +0000116// [bug 197930]
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000117//
118// ----
119//
120// Also, --show-reachable is a bad name because it also turns on the showing
121// of indirectly leaked blocks(!) It would be better named --show-all or
122// --show-all-heap-blocks, because that's the end result.
123//
124// ----
125//
126// Also, the VALGRIND_LEAK_CHECK and VALGRIND_QUICK_LEAK_CHECK aren't great
127// names. VALGRIND_FULL_LEAK_CHECK and VALGRIND_SUMMARY_LEAK_CHECK would be
128// better.
129//
130// ----
131//
132// Also, VALGRIND_COUNT_LEAKS and VALGRIND_COUNT_LEAK_BLOCKS aren't great as
133// they combine direct leaks and indirect leaks into one. New, more precise
134// ones (they'll need new names) would be good. If more categories are
135// used, as per the --follow-interior-pointers option, they should be
136// updated accordingly. And they should use a struct to return the values.
137//
138// ----
139//
140// Also, for this case:
141//
142// (4) p4 BBB ---> AAA
143//
144// BBB is definitely directly lost. AAA is definitely indirectly lost.
145// Here's the relevant loss records printed for a full check (each block is
146// 16 bytes):
147//
148// ==20397== 16 bytes in 1 blocks are indirectly lost in loss record 9 of 15
149// ==20397== at 0x4C2694E: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:177)
150// ==20397== by 0x400521: mk (leak-cases.c:49)
151// ==20397== by 0x400578: main (leak-cases.c:72)
152//
153// ==20397== 32 (16 direct, 16 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely
154// lost in loss record 14 of 15
155// ==20397== at 0x4C2694E: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:177)
156// ==20397== by 0x400521: mk (leak-cases.c:49)
157// ==20397== by 0x400580: main (leak-cases.c:72)
158//
159// The first one is fine -- it describes AAA.
160//
161// The second one is for BBB. It's correct in that 16 bytes in 1 block are
162// directly lost. It's also correct that 16 are indirectly lost as a result,
163// but it means that AAA is being counted twice in the loss records. (It's
164// not, thankfully, counted twice in the summary counts). Argh.
165//
166// This would be less confusing for the second one:
167//
168// ==20397== 16 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 14
169// of 15 (and 16 bytes in 1 block are indirectly lost as a result; they
170// are mentioned elsewhere (if --show-reachable=yes is given!))
171// ==20397== at 0x4C2694E: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:177)
172// ==20397== by 0x400521: mk (leak-cases.c:49)
173// ==20397== by 0x400580: main (leak-cases.c:72)
174//
175// But ideally we'd present the loss record for the directly lost block and
176// then the resultant indirectly lost blocks and make it clear the
177// dependence. Double argh.
178
179/*------------------------------------------------------------*/
180/*--- The actual algorithm. ---*/
181/*------------------------------------------------------------*/
182
183// - Find all the blocks (a.k.a. chunks) to check. Mempool chunks require
184// some special treatment because they can be within malloc'd blocks.
185// - Scan every word in the root set (GP registers and valid
186// non-heap memory words).
187// - First, we skip if it doesn't point to valid memory.
188// - Then, we see if it points to the start or interior of a block. If
189// so, we push the block onto the mark stack and mark it as having been
190// reached.
191// - Then, we process the mark stack, repeating the scanning for each block;
192// this can push more blocks onto the mark stack. We repeat until the
193// mark stack is empty. Each block is marked as definitely or possibly
194// reachable, depending on whether interior-pointers were required to
195// reach it.
196// - At this point we know for every block if it's reachable or not.
197// - We then push each unreached block onto the mark stack, using the block
198// number as the "clique" number.
199// - We process the mark stack again, this time grouping blocks into cliques
200// in order to facilitate the directly/indirectly lost categorisation.
201// - We group blocks by their ExeContexts and categorisation, and print them
202// if --leak-check=full. We also print summary numbers.
203//
204// A note on "cliques":
205// - A directly lost block is one with no pointers to it. An indirectly
206// lost block is one that is pointed to by a directly or indirectly lost
207// block.
208// - Each directly lost block has zero or more indirectly lost blocks
209// hanging off it. All these blocks together form a "clique". The
210// directly lost block is called the "clique leader". The clique number
211// is the number (in lc_chunks[]) of the clique leader.
212// - Actually, a directly lost block may be pointed to if it's part of a
213// cycle. In that case, there may be more than one choice for the clique
214// leader, and the choice is arbitrary. Eg. if you have A-->B and B-->A
215// either A or B could be the clique leader.
216// - Cliques cannot overlap, and will be truncated to avoid this. Eg. if we
217// have A-->C and B-->C, the two cliques will be {A,C} and {B}, or {A} and
218// {B,C} (again the choice is arbitrary). This is because we don't want
219// to count a block as indirectly lost more than once.
220//
221// A note on 'is_prior_definite':
222// - This is a boolean used in various places that indicates if the chain
223// up to the prior node (prior to the one being considered) is definite.
224// - In the clique == -1 case:
225// - if True it means that the prior node is a root-set node, or that the
226// prior node is a block which is reachable from the root-set via
227// start-pointers.
228// - if False it means that the prior node is a block that is only
229// reachable from the root-set via a path including at least one
230// interior-pointer.
231// - In the clique != -1 case, currently it's always True because we treat
232// start-pointers and interior-pointers the same for direct/indirect leak
233// checking. If we added a PossibleIndirectLeak state then this would
234// change.
235
236
237// Define to debug the memory-leak-detector.
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000238#define VG_DEBUG_LEAKCHECK 0
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000239#define VG_DEBUG_CLIQUE 0
240
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000241
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +0000242/*------------------------------------------------------------*/
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000243/*--- Getting the initial chunks, and searching them. ---*/
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +0000244/*------------------------------------------------------------*/
245
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000246// Compare the MC_Chunks by 'data' (i.e. the address of the block).
247static Int compare_MC_Chunks(void* n1, void* n2)
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +0000248{
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000249 MC_Chunk* mc1 = *(MC_Chunk**)n1;
250 MC_Chunk* mc2 = *(MC_Chunk**)n2;
251 if (mc1->data < mc2->data) return -1;
252 if (mc1->data > mc2->data) return 1;
253 return 0;
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +0000254}
255
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000256#if VG_DEBUG_LEAKCHECK
257// Used to sanity-check the fast binary-search mechanism.
258static
259Int find_chunk_for_OLD ( Addr ptr,
260 MC_Chunk** chunks,
261 Int n_chunks )
262
263{
264 Int i;
265 Addr a_lo, a_hi;
266 PROF_EVENT(70, "find_chunk_for_OLD");
267 for (i = 0; i < n_chunks; i++) {
268 PROF_EVENT(71, "find_chunk_for_OLD(loop)");
269 a_lo = chunks[i]->data;
270 a_hi = ((Addr)chunks[i]->data) + chunks[i]->szB;
271 if (a_lo <= ptr && ptr < a_hi)
272 return i;
273 }
274 return -1;
275}
276#endif
277
278// Find the i such that ptr points at or inside the block described by
279// chunks[i]. Return -1 if none found. This assumes that chunks[]
280// has been sorted on the 'data' field.
281static
282Int find_chunk_for ( Addr ptr,
283 MC_Chunk** chunks,
284 Int n_chunks )
285{
286 Addr a_mid_lo, a_mid_hi;
287 Int lo, mid, hi, retVal;
288 // VG_(printf)("find chunk for %p = ", ptr);
289 retVal = -1;
290 lo = 0;
291 hi = n_chunks-1;
292 while (True) {
293 // Invariant: current unsearched space is from lo to hi, inclusive.
294 if (lo > hi) break; // not found
295
296 mid = (lo + hi) / 2;
297 a_mid_lo = chunks[mid]->data;
298 a_mid_hi = chunks[mid]->data + chunks[mid]->szB;
299 // Extent of block 'mid' is [a_mid_lo .. a_mid_hi).
300 // Special-case zero-sized blocks - treat them as if they had
301 // size 1. Not doing so causes them to not cover any address
302 // range at all and so will never be identified as the target of
303 // any pointer, which causes them to be incorrectly reported as
304 // definitely leaked.
305 if (chunks[mid]->szB == 0)
306 a_mid_hi++;
307
308 if (ptr < a_mid_lo) {
309 hi = mid-1;
310 continue;
311 }
312 if (ptr >= a_mid_hi) {
313 lo = mid+1;
314 continue;
315 }
316 tl_assert(ptr >= a_mid_lo && ptr < a_mid_hi);
317 retVal = mid;
318 break;
319 }
320
321# if VG_DEBUG_LEAKCHECK
322 tl_assert(retVal == find_chunk_for_OLD ( ptr, chunks, n_chunks ));
323# endif
324 // VG_(printf)("%d\n", retVal);
325 return retVal;
326}
327
328
329static MC_Chunk**
330find_active_chunks(UInt* pn_chunks)
331{
332 // Our goal is to construct a set of chunks that includes every
333 // mempool chunk, and every malloc region that *doesn't* contain a
334 // mempool chunk.
335 MC_Mempool *mp;
336 MC_Chunk **mallocs, **chunks, *mc;
337 UInt n_mallocs, n_chunks, m, s;
338 Bool *malloc_chunk_holds_a_pool_chunk;
339
340 // First we collect all the malloc chunks into an array and sort it.
341 // We do this because we want to query the chunks by interior
342 // pointers, requiring binary search.
343 mallocs = (MC_Chunk**) VG_(HT_to_array)( MC_(malloc_list), &n_mallocs );
344 if (n_mallocs == 0) {
345 tl_assert(mallocs == NULL);
346 *pn_chunks = 0;
347 return NULL;
348 }
349 VG_(ssort)(mallocs, n_mallocs, sizeof(VgHashNode*), compare_MC_Chunks);
350
351 // Then we build an array containing a Bool for each malloc chunk,
352 // indicating whether it contains any mempools.
353 malloc_chunk_holds_a_pool_chunk = VG_(calloc)( "mc.fas.1",
354 n_mallocs, sizeof(Bool) );
355 n_chunks = n_mallocs;
356
357 // Then we loop over the mempool tables. For each chunk in each
358 // pool, we set the entry in the Bool array corresponding to the
359 // malloc chunk containing the mempool chunk.
360 VG_(HT_ResetIter)(MC_(mempool_list));
361 while ( (mp = VG_(HT_Next)(MC_(mempool_list))) ) {
362 VG_(HT_ResetIter)(mp->chunks);
363 while ( (mc = VG_(HT_Next)(mp->chunks)) ) {
364
365 // We'll need to record this chunk.
366 n_chunks++;
367
368 // Possibly invalidate the malloc holding the beginning of this chunk.
369 m = find_chunk_for(mc->data, mallocs, n_mallocs);
370 if (m != -1 && malloc_chunk_holds_a_pool_chunk[m] == False) {
371 tl_assert(n_chunks > 0);
372 n_chunks--;
373 malloc_chunk_holds_a_pool_chunk[m] = True;
374 }
375
376 // Possibly invalidate the malloc holding the end of this chunk.
377 if (mc->szB > 1) {
378 m = find_chunk_for(mc->data + (mc->szB - 1), mallocs, n_mallocs);
379 if (m != -1 && malloc_chunk_holds_a_pool_chunk[m] == False) {
380 tl_assert(n_chunks > 0);
381 n_chunks--;
382 malloc_chunk_holds_a_pool_chunk[m] = True;
383 }
384 }
385 }
386 }
387 tl_assert(n_chunks > 0);
388
389 // Create final chunk array.
390 chunks = VG_(malloc)("mc.fas.2", sizeof(VgHashNode*) * (n_chunks));
391 s = 0;
392
393 // Copy the mempool chunks and the non-marked malloc chunks into a
394 // combined array of chunks.
395 VG_(HT_ResetIter)(MC_(mempool_list));
396 while ( (mp = VG_(HT_Next)(MC_(mempool_list))) ) {
397 VG_(HT_ResetIter)(mp->chunks);
398 while ( (mc = VG_(HT_Next)(mp->chunks)) ) {
399 tl_assert(s < n_chunks);
400 chunks[s++] = mc;
401 }
402 }
403 for (m = 0; m < n_mallocs; ++m) {
404 if (!malloc_chunk_holds_a_pool_chunk[m]) {
405 tl_assert(s < n_chunks);
406 chunks[s++] = mallocs[m];
407 }
408 }
409 tl_assert(s == n_chunks);
410
411 // Free temporaries.
412 VG_(free)(mallocs);
413 VG_(free)(malloc_chunk_holds_a_pool_chunk);
414
415 *pn_chunks = n_chunks;
416
417 return chunks;
418}
419
420/*------------------------------------------------------------*/
421/*--- The leak detector proper. ---*/
422/*------------------------------------------------------------*/
423
424// Holds extra info about each block during leak checking.
425typedef
426 struct {
427 UInt state:2; // Reachedness.
tom1d0f3f62010-10-04 20:55:21 +0000428 UInt pending:1; // Scan pending.
429 SizeT indirect_szB : (sizeof(SizeT)*8)-3; // If Unreached, how many bytes
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000430 // are unreachable from here.
431 }
432 LC_Extra;
433
434// An array holding pointers to every chunk we're checking. Sorted by address.
435static MC_Chunk** lc_chunks;
436// How many chunks we're dealing with.
437static Int lc_n_chunks;
438
439// This has the same number of entries as lc_chunks, and each entry
440// in lc_chunks corresponds with the entry here (ie. lc_chunks[i] and
441// lc_extras[i] describe the same block).
442static LC_Extra* lc_extras;
443
444// Records chunks that are currently being processed. Each element in the
445// stack is an index into lc_chunks and lc_extras. Its size is
446// 'lc_n_chunks' because in the worst case that's how many chunks could be
447// pushed onto it (actually I think the maximum is lc_n_chunks-1 but let's
448// be conservative).
449static Int* lc_markstack;
450// The index of the top element of the stack; -1 if the stack is empty, 0 if
451// the stack has one element, 1 if it has two, etc.
452static Int lc_markstack_top;
453
454// Keeps track of how many bytes of memory we've scanned, for printing.
455// (Nb: We don't keep track of how many register bytes we've scanned.)
456static SizeT lc_scanned_szB;
457
458
459SizeT MC_(bytes_leaked) = 0;
460SizeT MC_(bytes_indirect) = 0;
461SizeT MC_(bytes_dubious) = 0;
462SizeT MC_(bytes_reachable) = 0;
463SizeT MC_(bytes_suppressed) = 0;
464
465SizeT MC_(blocks_leaked) = 0;
466SizeT MC_(blocks_indirect) = 0;
467SizeT MC_(blocks_dubious) = 0;
468SizeT MC_(blocks_reachable) = 0;
469SizeT MC_(blocks_suppressed) = 0;
470
sewardj45f4e7c2005-09-27 19:20:21 +0000471
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000472// Determines if a pointer is to a chunk. Returns the chunk number et al
473// via call-by-reference.
474static Bool
475lc_is_a_chunk_ptr(Addr ptr, Int* pch_no, MC_Chunk** pch, LC_Extra** pex)
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +0000476{
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000477 Int ch_no;
478 MC_Chunk* ch;
479 LC_Extra* ex;
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +0000480
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000481 // Quick filter.
482 if (!VG_(am_is_valid_for_client)(ptr, 1, VKI_PROT_READ)) {
483 return False;
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000484 } else {
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000485 ch_no = find_chunk_for(ptr, lc_chunks, lc_n_chunks);
486 tl_assert(ch_no >= -1 && ch_no < lc_n_chunks);
487
488 if (ch_no == -1) {
489 return False;
490 } else {
491 // Ok, we've found a pointer to a chunk. Get the MC_Chunk and its
492 // LC_Extra.
493 ch = lc_chunks[ch_no];
494 ex = &(lc_extras[ch_no]);
495
496 tl_assert(ptr >= ch->data);
497 tl_assert(ptr < ch->data + ch->szB + (ch->szB==0 ? 1 : 0));
498
499 if (VG_DEBUG_LEAKCHECK)
500 VG_(printf)("ptr=%#lx -> block %d\n", ptr, ch_no);
501
502 *pch_no = ch_no;
503 *pch = ch;
504 *pex = ex;
505
506 return True;
507 }
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000508 }
509}
510
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000511// Push a chunk (well, just its index) onto the mark stack.
512static void lc_push(Int ch_no, MC_Chunk* ch)
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000513{
tom1d0f3f62010-10-04 20:55:21 +0000514 if (!lc_extras[ch_no].pending) {
515 if (0) {
516 VG_(printf)("pushing %#lx-%#lx\n", ch->data, ch->data + ch->szB);
517 }
518 lc_markstack_top++;
519 tl_assert(lc_markstack_top < lc_n_chunks);
520 lc_markstack[lc_markstack_top] = ch_no;
521 tl_assert(!lc_extras[ch_no].pending);
522 lc_extras[ch_no].pending = True;
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000523 }
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000524}
525
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000526// Return the index of the chunk on the top of the mark stack, or -1 if
527// there isn't one.
528static Bool lc_pop(Int* ret)
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000529{
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000530 if (-1 == lc_markstack_top) {
531 return False;
532 } else {
533 tl_assert(0 <= lc_markstack_top && lc_markstack_top < lc_n_chunks);
534 *ret = lc_markstack[lc_markstack_top];
535 lc_markstack_top--;
tom1d0f3f62010-10-04 20:55:21 +0000536 tl_assert(lc_extras[*ret].pending);
537 lc_extras[*ret].pending = False;
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000538 return True;
539 }
540}
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000541
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000542
543// If 'ptr' is pointing to a heap-allocated block which hasn't been seen
544// before, push it onto the mark stack.
545static void
546lc_push_without_clique_if_a_chunk_ptr(Addr ptr, Bool is_prior_definite)
547{
548 Int ch_no;
549 MC_Chunk* ch;
550 LC_Extra* ex;
551
552 if ( ! lc_is_a_chunk_ptr(ptr, &ch_no, &ch, &ex) )
553 return;
tom1d0f3f62010-10-04 20:55:21 +0000554
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000555 // Possibly upgrade the state, ie. one of:
556 // - Unreached --> Possible
557 // - Unreached --> Reachable
558 // - Possible --> Reachable
tom1d0f3f62010-10-04 20:55:21 +0000559 if (ptr == ch->data && is_prior_definite && ex->state != Reachable) {
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000560 // 'ptr' points to the start of the block, and the prior node is
561 // definite, which means that this block is definitely reachable.
562 ex->state = Reachable;
563
tom1d0f3f62010-10-04 20:55:21 +0000564 // State has changed to Reachable so (re)scan the block to make
565 // sure any blocks it points to are correctly marked.
566 lc_push(ch_no, ch);
567
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000568 } else if (ex->state == Unreached) {
569 // Either 'ptr' is a interior-pointer, or the prior node isn't definite,
570 // which means that we can only mark this block as possibly reachable.
571 ex->state = Possible;
tom1d0f3f62010-10-04 20:55:21 +0000572
573 // State has changed to Possible so (re)scan the block to make
574 // sure any blocks it points to are correctly marked.
575 lc_push(ch_no, ch);
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000576 }
577}
578
579static void
580lc_push_if_a_chunk_ptr_register(Addr ptr)
581{
582 lc_push_without_clique_if_a_chunk_ptr(ptr, /*is_prior_definite*/True);
583}
584
585// If ptr is pointing to a heap-allocated block which hasn't been seen
586// before, push it onto the mark stack. Clique is the index of the
587// clique leader.
588static void
589lc_push_with_clique_if_a_chunk_ptr(Addr ptr, Int clique)
590{
591 Int ch_no;
592 MC_Chunk* ch;
593 LC_Extra* ex;
594
595 tl_assert(0 <= clique && clique < lc_n_chunks);
596
597 if ( ! lc_is_a_chunk_ptr(ptr, &ch_no, &ch, &ex) )
598 return;
599
600 // If it's not Unreached, it's already been handled so ignore it.
601 // If ch_no==clique, it's the clique leader, which means this is a cyclic
602 // structure; again ignore it because it's already been handled.
603 if (ex->state == Unreached && ch_no != clique) {
604 // Note that, unlike reachable blocks, we currently don't distinguish
605 // between start-pointers and interior-pointers here. We probably
606 // should, though.
607 ex->state = IndirectLeak;
608 lc_push(ch_no, ch);
609
610 // Add the block to the clique, and add its size to the
611 // clique-leader's indirect size. Also, if the new block was
612 // itself a clique leader, it isn't any more, so add its
613 // indirect_szB to the new clique leader.
614 if (VG_DEBUG_CLIQUE) {
615 if (ex->indirect_szB > 0)
616 VG_(printf)(" clique %d joining clique %d adding %lu+%lu\n",
617 ch_no, clique, (SizeT)ch->szB, (SizeT)ex->indirect_szB);
618 else
619 VG_(printf)(" block %d joining clique %d adding %lu\n",
620 ch_no, clique, (SizeT)ch->szB);
621 }
622
623 lc_extras[clique].indirect_szB += ch->szB;
624 lc_extras[clique].indirect_szB += ex->indirect_szB;
625 ex->indirect_szB = 0; // Shouldn't matter.
626 }
627}
628
629static void
630lc_push_if_a_chunk_ptr(Addr ptr, Int clique, Bool is_prior_definite)
631{
632 if (-1 == clique)
633 lc_push_without_clique_if_a_chunk_ptr(ptr, is_prior_definite);
634 else
635 lc_push_with_clique_if_a_chunk_ptr(ptr, clique);
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000636}
637
sewardj45d94cc2005-04-20 14:44:11 +0000638
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000639static jmp_buf memscan_jmpbuf;
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000640
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000641static
642void scan_all_valid_memory_catcher ( Int sigNo, Addr addr )
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000643{
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000644 if (0)
645 VG_(printf)("OUCH! sig=%d addr=%#lx\n", sigNo, addr);
646 if (sigNo == VKI_SIGSEGV || sigNo == VKI_SIGBUS)
647 __builtin_longjmp(memscan_jmpbuf, 1);
648}
649
650// Scan a block of memory between [start, start+len). This range may
651// be bogus, inaccessable, or otherwise strange; we deal with it. For each
652// valid aligned word we assume it's a pointer to a chunk a push the chunk
653// onto the mark stack if so.
654static void
655lc_scan_memory(Addr start, SizeT len, Bool is_prior_definite, Int clique)
656{
657 Addr ptr = VG_ROUNDUP(start, sizeof(Addr));
njn13bfd852005-06-02 03:52:53 +0000658 Addr end = VG_ROUNDDN(start+len, sizeof(Addr));
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000659 vki_sigset_t sigmask;
660
661 if (VG_DEBUG_LEAKCHECK)
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000662 VG_(printf)("scan %#lx-%#lx (%lu)\n", start, end, len);
663
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000664 VG_(sigprocmask)(VKI_SIG_SETMASK, NULL, &sigmask);
njn695c16e2005-03-27 03:40:28 +0000665 VG_(set_fault_catcher)(scan_all_valid_memory_catcher);
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000666
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000667 // We might be in the middle of a page. Do a cheap check to see if
668 // it's valid; if not, skip onto the next page.
sewardj45f4e7c2005-09-27 19:20:21 +0000669 if (!VG_(am_is_valid_for_client)(ptr, sizeof(Addr), VKI_PROT_READ))
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000670 ptr = VG_PGROUNDUP(ptr+1); // First page is bad - skip it.
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000671
sewardj05fe85e2005-04-27 22:46:36 +0000672 while (ptr < end) {
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000673 Addr addr;
674
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000675 // Skip invalid chunks.
676 if ( ! MC_(is_within_valid_secondary)(ptr) ) {
677 ptr = VG_ROUNDUP(ptr+1, SM_SIZE);
678 continue;
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000679 }
680
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000681 // Look to see if this page seems reasonable.
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000682 if ((ptr % VKI_PAGE_SIZE) == 0) {
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000683 if (!VG_(am_is_valid_for_client)(ptr, sizeof(Addr), VKI_PROT_READ)) {
684 ptr += VKI_PAGE_SIZE; // Bad page - skip it.
685 continue;
686 }
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000687 }
688
689 if (__builtin_setjmp(memscan_jmpbuf) == 0) {
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000690 if ( MC_(is_valid_aligned_word)(ptr) ) {
691 lc_scanned_szB += sizeof(Addr);
692 addr = *(Addr *)ptr;
693 // If we get here, the scanned word is in valid memory. Now
694 // let's see if its contents point to a chunk.
695 lc_push_if_a_chunk_ptr(addr, clique, is_prior_definite);
696 } else if (0 && VG_DEBUG_LEAKCHECK) {
697 VG_(printf)("%#lx not valid\n", ptr);
698 }
699 ptr += sizeof(Addr);
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000700 } else {
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000701 // We need to restore the signal mask, because we were
702 // longjmped out of a signal handler.
703 VG_(sigprocmask)(VKI_SIG_SETMASK, &sigmask, NULL);
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000704
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000705 ptr = VG_PGROUNDUP(ptr+1); // Bad page - skip it.
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000706 }
707 }
708
709 VG_(sigprocmask)(VKI_SIG_SETMASK, &sigmask, NULL);
710 VG_(set_fault_catcher)(NULL);
711}
712
sewardj45d94cc2005-04-20 14:44:11 +0000713
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000714// Process the mark stack until empty.
715static void lc_process_markstack(Int clique)
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000716{
njne3675d62009-05-19 02:08:25 +0000717 Int top = -1; // shut gcc up
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000718 Bool is_prior_definite;
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000719
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000720 while (lc_pop(&top)) {
tom1d0f3f62010-10-04 20:55:21 +0000721 tl_assert(top >= 0 && top < lc_n_chunks);
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000722
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000723 // See comment about 'is_prior_definite' at the top to understand this.
724 is_prior_definite = ( Possible != lc_extras[top].state );
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000725
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000726 lc_scan_memory(lc_chunks[top]->data, lc_chunks[top]->szB,
727 is_prior_definite, clique);
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000728 }
729}
730
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +0000731static Word cmp_LossRecordKey_LossRecord(const void* key, const void* elem)
732{
733 LossRecordKey* a = (LossRecordKey*)key;
734 LossRecordKey* b = &(((LossRecord*)elem)->key);
735
736 // Compare on states first because that's fast.
737 if (a->state < b->state) return -1;
738 if (a->state > b->state) return 1;
739 // Ok, the states are equal. Now compare the locations, which is slower.
740 if (VG_(eq_ExeContext)(
741 MC_(clo_leak_resolution), a->allocated_at, b->allocated_at))
742 return 0;
743 // Different locations. Ordering is arbitrary, just use the ec pointer.
744 if (a->allocated_at < b->allocated_at) return -1;
745 if (a->allocated_at > b->allocated_at) return 1;
746 VG_(tool_panic)("bad LossRecord comparison");
747}
748
749static Int cmp_LossRecords(void* va, void* vb)
750{
751 LossRecord* lr_a = *(LossRecord**)va;
752 LossRecord* lr_b = *(LossRecord**)vb;
753 SizeT total_szB_a = lr_a->szB + lr_a->indirect_szB;
754 SizeT total_szB_b = lr_b->szB + lr_b->indirect_szB;
755
756 // First compare by sizes.
757 if (total_szB_a < total_szB_b) return -1;
758 if (total_szB_a > total_szB_b) return 1;
759 // If size are equal, compare by states.
760 if (lr_a->key.state < lr_b->key.state) return -1;
761 if (lr_a->key.state > lr_b->key.state) return 1;
njne10c7f82009-05-06 06:52:47 +0000762 // If they're still equal here, it doesn't matter that much, but we keep
763 // comparing other things so that regtests are as deterministic as
764 // possible. So: compare num_blocks.
765 if (lr_a->num_blocks < lr_b->num_blocks) return -1;
766 if (lr_a->num_blocks > lr_b->num_blocks) return 1;
767 // Finally, compare ExeContext addresses... older ones are likely to have
768 // lower addresses.
769 if (lr_a->key.allocated_at < lr_b->key.allocated_at) return -1;
770 if (lr_a->key.allocated_at > lr_b->key.allocated_at) return 1;
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +0000771 return 0;
772}
773
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000774static void print_results(ThreadId tid, Bool is_full_check)
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000775{
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +0000776 Int i, n_lossrecords;
777 OSet* lr_table;
778 LossRecord** lr_array;
779 LossRecord* lr;
780 Bool is_suppressed;
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000781
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +0000782 // Create the lr_table, which holds the loss records.
783 lr_table =
784 VG_(OSetGen_Create)(offsetof(LossRecord, key),
785 cmp_LossRecordKey_LossRecord,
786 VG_(malloc), "mc.pr.1",
787 VG_(free));
788
789 // Convert the chunks into loss records, merging them where appropriate.
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000790 for (i = 0; i < lc_n_chunks; i++) {
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +0000791 MC_Chunk* ch = lc_chunks[i];
792 LC_Extra* ex = &(lc_extras)[i];
793 LossRecord* old_lr;
794 LossRecordKey lrkey;
795 lrkey.state = ex->state;
796 lrkey.allocated_at = ch->where;
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000797
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +0000798 old_lr = VG_(OSetGen_Lookup)(lr_table, &lrkey);
799 if (old_lr) {
800 // We found an existing loss record matching this chunk. Update the
801 // loss record's details in-situ. This is safe because we don't
802 // change the elements used as the OSet key.
803 old_lr->szB += ch->szB;
804 old_lr->indirect_szB += ex->indirect_szB;
805 old_lr->num_blocks++;
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000806 } else {
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +0000807 // No existing loss record matches this chunk. Create a new loss
808 // record, initialise it from the chunk, and insert it into lr_table.
809 lr = VG_(OSetGen_AllocNode)(lr_table, sizeof(LossRecord));
810 lr->key = lrkey;
811 lr->szB = ch->szB;
812 lr->indirect_szB = ex->indirect_szB;
813 lr->num_blocks = 1;
814 VG_(OSetGen_Insert)(lr_table, lr);
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000815 }
816 }
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +0000817 n_lossrecords = VG_(OSetGen_Size)(lr_table);
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000818
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +0000819 // Create an array of pointers to the loss records.
820 lr_array = VG_(malloc)("mc.pr.2", n_lossrecords * sizeof(LossRecord*));
821 i = 0;
822 VG_(OSetGen_ResetIter)(lr_table);
823 while ( (lr = VG_(OSetGen_Next)(lr_table)) ) {
824 lr_array[i++] = lr;
825 }
826 tl_assert(i == n_lossrecords);
827
828 // Sort the array by loss record sizes.
829 VG_(ssort)(lr_array, n_lossrecords, sizeof(LossRecord*),
830 cmp_LossRecords);
831
832 // Zero totals.
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000833 MC_(blocks_leaked) = MC_(bytes_leaked) = 0;
834 MC_(blocks_indirect) = MC_(bytes_indirect) = 0;
835 MC_(blocks_dubious) = MC_(bytes_dubious) = 0;
836 MC_(blocks_reachable) = MC_(bytes_reachable) = 0;
837 MC_(blocks_suppressed) = MC_(bytes_suppressed) = 0;
838
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +0000839 // Print the loss records (in size order) and collect summary stats.
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000840 for (i = 0; i < n_lossrecords; i++) {
njn18afe5d2009-08-10 08:25:39 +0000841 Bool count_as_error, print_record;
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000842 // Rules for printing:
843 // - We don't show suppressed loss records ever (and that's controlled
844 // within the error manager).
845 // - We show non-suppressed loss records that are not "reachable" if
846 // --leak-check=yes.
847 // - We show all non-suppressed loss records if --leak-check=yes and
848 // --show-reachable=yes.
849 //
850 // Nb: here "reachable" means Reachable *or* IndirectLeak; note that
851 // this is different to "still reachable" used elsewhere because it
852 // includes indirectly lost blocks!
853 //
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +0000854 lr = lr_array[i];
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000855 print_record = is_full_check &&
njn26670552009-08-13 00:02:30 +0000856 ( MC_(clo_show_reachable) ||
857 Unreached == lr->key.state ||
bart3cedf572010-08-26 10:56:27 +0000858 ( MC_(clo_show_possibly_lost) &&
859 Possible == lr->key.state ) );
njn26670552009-08-13 00:02:30 +0000860 // We don't count a leaks as errors with --leak-check=summary.
861 // Otherwise you can get high error counts with few or no error
862 // messages, which can be confusing. Also, you could argue that
863 // indirect leaks should be counted as errors, but it seems better to
864 // make the counting criteria similar to the printing criteria. So we
865 // don't count them.
866 count_as_error = is_full_check &&
867 ( Unreached == lr->key.state ||
868 Possible == lr->key.state );
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000869 is_suppressed =
njn18afe5d2009-08-10 08:25:39 +0000870 MC_(record_leak_error) ( tid, i+1, n_lossrecords, lr, print_record,
871 count_as_error );
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000872
873 if (is_suppressed) {
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +0000874 MC_(blocks_suppressed) += lr->num_blocks;
875 MC_(bytes_suppressed) += lr->szB;
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000876
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +0000877 } else if (Unreached == lr->key.state) {
878 MC_(blocks_leaked) += lr->num_blocks;
879 MC_(bytes_leaked) += lr->szB;
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000880
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +0000881 } else if (IndirectLeak == lr->key.state) {
882 MC_(blocks_indirect) += lr->num_blocks;
883 MC_(bytes_indirect) += lr->szB;
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000884
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +0000885 } else if (Possible == lr->key.state) {
886 MC_(blocks_dubious) += lr->num_blocks;
887 MC_(bytes_dubious) += lr->szB;
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000888
njn29a5c012009-05-06 06:15:55 +0000889 } else if (Reachable == lr->key.state) {
890 MC_(blocks_reachable) += lr->num_blocks;
891 MC_(bytes_reachable) += lr->szB;
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000892
893 } else {
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000894 VG_(tool_panic)("unknown loss mode");
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000895 }
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000896 }
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000897
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000898 if (VG_(clo_verbosity) > 0 && !VG_(clo_xml)) {
sewardj6b523cd2009-07-15 14:49:40 +0000899 VG_(umsg)("LEAK SUMMARY:\n");
njnb6267bd2009-08-12 00:14:16 +0000900 VG_(umsg)(" definitely lost: %'lu bytes in %'lu blocks\n",
sewardj6b523cd2009-07-15 14:49:40 +0000901 MC_(bytes_leaked), MC_(blocks_leaked) );
njnb6267bd2009-08-12 00:14:16 +0000902 VG_(umsg)(" indirectly lost: %'lu bytes in %'lu blocks\n",
sewardj6b523cd2009-07-15 14:49:40 +0000903 MC_(bytes_indirect), MC_(blocks_indirect) );
njnb6267bd2009-08-12 00:14:16 +0000904 VG_(umsg)(" possibly lost: %'lu bytes in %'lu blocks\n",
sewardj6b523cd2009-07-15 14:49:40 +0000905 MC_(bytes_dubious), MC_(blocks_dubious) );
njnb6267bd2009-08-12 00:14:16 +0000906 VG_(umsg)(" still reachable: %'lu bytes in %'lu blocks\n",
sewardj6b523cd2009-07-15 14:49:40 +0000907 MC_(bytes_reachable), MC_(blocks_reachable) );
njnb6267bd2009-08-12 00:14:16 +0000908 VG_(umsg)(" suppressed: %'lu bytes in %'lu blocks\n",
sewardj6b523cd2009-07-15 14:49:40 +0000909 MC_(bytes_suppressed), MC_(blocks_suppressed) );
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000910 if (!is_full_check &&
911 (MC_(blocks_leaked) + MC_(blocks_indirect) +
912 MC_(blocks_dubious) + MC_(blocks_reachable)) > 0) {
sewardj6b523cd2009-07-15 14:49:40 +0000913 VG_(umsg)("Rerun with --leak-check=full to see details "
njnb6267bd2009-08-12 00:14:16 +0000914 "of leaked memory\n");
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000915 }
916 if (is_full_check &&
917 MC_(blocks_reachable) > 0 && !MC_(clo_show_reachable))
918 {
sewardj6b523cd2009-07-15 14:49:40 +0000919 VG_(umsg)("Reachable blocks (those to which a pointer "
920 "was found) are not shown.\n");
921 VG_(umsg)("To see them, rerun with: --leak-check=full "
922 "--show-reachable=yes\n");
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000923 }
njnb6267bd2009-08-12 00:14:16 +0000924 VG_(umsg)("\n");
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +0000925 }
926}
927
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000928/*------------------------------------------------------------*/
929/*--- Top-level entry point. ---*/
930/*------------------------------------------------------------*/
sewardj3cf26a52006-07-27 23:48:53 +0000931
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000932void MC_(detect_memory_leaks) ( ThreadId tid, LeakCheckMode mode )
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +0000933{
njnb965efb2009-08-10 07:36:54 +0000934 Int i, j;
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +0000935
sewardj76754cf2005-03-14 00:14:04 +0000936 tl_assert(mode != LC_Off);
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +0000937
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000938 // Get the chunks, stop if there were none.
939 lc_chunks = find_active_chunks(&lc_n_chunks);
940 if (lc_n_chunks == 0) {
941 tl_assert(lc_chunks == NULL);
sewardj71bc3cb2005-05-19 00:25:45 +0000942 if (VG_(clo_verbosity) >= 1 && !VG_(clo_xml)) {
njnb6267bd2009-08-12 00:14:16 +0000943 VG_(umsg)("All heap blocks were freed -- no leaks are possible\n");
sewardj2d9e8742009-08-07 15:46:56 +0000944 VG_(umsg)("\n");
sewardj37d06f22003-09-17 21:48:26 +0000945 }
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +0000946 return;
947 }
948
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000949 // Sort the array so blocks are in ascending order in memory.
950 VG_(ssort)(lc_chunks, lc_n_chunks, sizeof(VgHashNode*), compare_MC_Chunks);
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +0000951
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000952 // Sanity check -- make sure they're in order.
953 for (i = 0; i < lc_n_chunks-1; i++) {
954 tl_assert( lc_chunks[i]->data <= lc_chunks[i+1]->data);
955 }
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +0000956
njnb965efb2009-08-10 07:36:54 +0000957 // Sanity check -- make sure they don't overlap. The one exception is that
958 // we allow a MALLOCLIKE block to sit entirely within a malloc() block.
959 // This is for bug 100628. If this occurs, we ignore the malloc() block
960 // for leak-checking purposes. This is a hack and probably should be done
961 // better, but at least it's consistent with mempools (which are treated
962 // like this in find_active_chunks). Mempools have a separate VgHashTable
963 // for mempool chunks, but if custom-allocated blocks are put in a separate
964 // table from normal heap blocks it makes free-mismatch checking more
965 // difficult.
966 //
967 // If this check fails, it probably means that the application
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000968 // has done something stupid with VALGRIND_MALLOCLIKE_BLOCK client
njnb965efb2009-08-10 07:36:54 +0000969 // requests, eg. has made overlapping requests (which are
970 // nonsensical), or used VALGRIND_MALLOCLIKE_BLOCK for stack locations;
971 // again nonsensical.
972 //
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +0000973 for (i = 0; i < lc_n_chunks-1; i++) {
974 MC_Chunk* ch1 = lc_chunks[i];
975 MC_Chunk* ch2 = lc_chunks[i+1];
njnb965efb2009-08-10 07:36:54 +0000976
977 Addr start1 = ch1->data;
978 Addr start2 = ch2->data;
979 Addr end1 = ch1->data + ch1->szB - 1;
980 Addr end2 = ch2->data + ch2->szB - 1;
981 Bool isCustom1 = ch1->allockind == MC_AllocCustom;
982 Bool isCustom2 = ch2->allockind == MC_AllocCustom;
983
984 if (end1 < start2) {
985 // Normal case - no overlap.
986
987 // We used to allow exact duplicates, I'm not sure why. --njn
988 //} else if (start1 == start2 && end1 == end2) {
989 // Degenerate case: exact duplicates.
990
991 } else if (start1 >= start2 && end1 <= end2 && isCustom1 && !isCustom2) {
992 // Block i is MALLOCLIKE and entirely within block i+1.
993 // Remove block i+1.
994 for (j = i+1; j < lc_n_chunks-1; j++) {
995 lc_chunks[j] = lc_chunks[j+1];
996 }
997 lc_n_chunks--;
998
999 } else if (start2 >= start1 && end2 <= end1 && isCustom2 && !isCustom1) {
1000 // Block i+1 is MALLOCLIKE and entirely within block i.
1001 // Remove block i.
1002 for (j = i; j < lc_n_chunks-1; j++) {
1003 lc_chunks[j] = lc_chunks[j+1];
1004 }
1005 lc_n_chunks--;
1006
1007 } else {
1008 VG_(umsg)("Block 0x%lx..0x%lx overlaps with block 0x%lx..0x%lx",
1009 start1, end1, start1, end2);
1010 VG_(umsg)("This is usually caused by using VALGRIND_MALLOCLIKE_BLOCK");
1011 VG_(umsg)("in an inappropriate way.");
1012 tl_assert (0);
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001013 }
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001014 }
1015
1016 // Initialise lc_extras.
1017 lc_extras = VG_(malloc)( "mc.dml.2", lc_n_chunks * sizeof(LC_Extra) );
1018 for (i = 0; i < lc_n_chunks; i++) {
1019 lc_extras[i].state = Unreached;
tom1d0f3f62010-10-04 20:55:21 +00001020 lc_extras[i].pending = False;
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001021 lc_extras[i].indirect_szB = 0;
1022 }
1023
1024 // Initialise lc_markstack.
1025 lc_markstack = VG_(malloc)( "mc.dml.2", lc_n_chunks * sizeof(Int) );
1026 for (i = 0; i < lc_n_chunks; i++) {
1027 lc_markstack[i] = -1;
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +00001028 }
1029 lc_markstack_top = -1;
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +00001030
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001031 // Verbosity.
sewardj2d9e8742009-08-07 15:46:56 +00001032 if (VG_(clo_verbosity) > 1 && !VG_(clo_xml)) {
njnb6267bd2009-08-12 00:14:16 +00001033 VG_(umsg)( "Searching for pointers to %'d not-freed blocks\n",
sewardj6b523cd2009-07-15 14:49:40 +00001034 lc_n_chunks );
sewardj2d9e8742009-08-07 15:46:56 +00001035 }
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +00001036
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001037 // Scan the memory root-set, pushing onto the mark stack any blocks
1038 // pointed to.
1039 {
1040 Int n_seg_starts;
njnac1e0332009-05-08 00:39:31 +00001041 Addr* seg_starts = VG_(get_segment_starts)( &n_seg_starts );
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +00001042
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001043 tl_assert(seg_starts && n_seg_starts > 0);
sewardjde3ad732006-07-27 23:12:17 +00001044
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001045 lc_scanned_szB = 0;
sewardjde3ad732006-07-27 23:12:17 +00001046
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001047 // VG_(am_show_nsegments)( 0, "leakcheck");
1048 for (i = 0; i < n_seg_starts; i++) {
1049 SizeT seg_size;
1050 NSegment const* seg = VG_(am_find_nsegment)( seg_starts[i] );
1051 tl_assert(seg);
1052
1053 if (seg->kind != SkFileC && seg->kind != SkAnonC) continue;
1054 if (!(seg->hasR && seg->hasW)) continue;
1055 if (seg->isCH) continue;
1056
1057 // Don't poke around in device segments as this may cause
1058 // hangs. Exclude /dev/zero just in case someone allocated
1059 // memory by explicitly mapping /dev/zero.
1060 if (seg->kind == SkFileC
1061 && (VKI_S_ISCHR(seg->mode) || VKI_S_ISBLK(seg->mode))) {
1062 HChar* dev_name = VG_(am_get_filename)( (NSegment*)seg );
1063 if (dev_name && 0 == VG_(strcmp)(dev_name, "/dev/zero")) {
1064 // Don't skip /dev/zero.
1065 } else {
1066 // Skip this device mapping.
1067 continue;
1068 }
1069 }
1070
1071 if (0)
1072 VG_(printf)("ACCEPT %2d %#lx %#lx\n", i, seg->start, seg->end);
1073
1074 // Scan the segment. We use -1 for the clique number, because this
1075 // is a root-set.
1076 seg_size = seg->end - seg->start + 1;
1077 if (VG_(clo_verbosity) > 2) {
1078 VG_(message)(Vg_DebugMsg,
sewardj6b523cd2009-07-15 14:49:40 +00001079 " Scanning root segment: %#lx..%#lx (%lu)\n",
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001080 seg->start, seg->end, seg_size);
1081 }
1082 lc_scan_memory(seg->start, seg_size, /*is_prior_definite*/True, -1);
1083 }
sewardj45f4e7c2005-09-27 19:20:21 +00001084 }
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +00001085
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001086 // Scan GP registers for chunk pointers.
1087 VG_(apply_to_GP_regs)(lc_push_if_a_chunk_ptr_register);
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +00001088
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001089 // Process the pushed blocks. After this, every block that is reachable
1090 // from the root-set has been traced.
1091 lc_process_markstack(/*clique*/-1);
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +00001092
njnb6267bd2009-08-12 00:14:16 +00001093 if (VG_(clo_verbosity) > 1 && !VG_(clo_xml)) {
1094 VG_(umsg)("Checked %'lu bytes\n", lc_scanned_szB);
1095 VG_(umsg)( "\n" );
1096 }
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +00001097
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001098 // Trace all the leaked blocks to determine which are directly leaked and
1099 // which are indirectly leaked. For each Unreached block, push it onto
1100 // the mark stack, and find all the as-yet-Unreached blocks reachable
1101 // from it. These form a clique and are marked IndirectLeak, and their
1102 // size is added to the clique leader's indirect size. If one of the
1103 // found blocks was itself a clique leader (from a previous clique), then
1104 // the cliques are merged.
1105 for (i = 0; i < lc_n_chunks; i++) {
1106 MC_Chunk* ch = lc_chunks[i];
1107 LC_Extra* ex = &(lc_extras[i]);
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +00001108
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001109 if (VG_DEBUG_CLIQUE)
1110 VG_(printf)("cliques: %d at %#lx -> Loss state %d\n",
1111 i, ch->data, ex->state);
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +00001112
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001113 tl_assert(lc_markstack_top == -1);
1114
1115 if (ex->state == Unreached) {
1116 if (VG_DEBUG_CLIQUE)
1117 VG_(printf)("%d: gathering clique %#lx\n", i, ch->data);
1118
1119 // Push this Unreached block onto the stack and process it.
1120 lc_push(i, ch);
1121 lc_process_markstack(i);
1122
1123 tl_assert(lc_markstack_top == -1);
1124 tl_assert(ex->state == Unreached);
nethercote0f19bce2003-12-02 10:17:44 +00001125 }
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +00001126 }
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001127
1128 print_results( tid, ( mode == LC_Full ? True : False ) );
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +00001129
njn8225cc02009-03-09 22:52:24 +00001130 VG_(free) ( lc_chunks );
1131 VG_(free) ( lc_extras );
sewardjb5f6f512005-03-10 23:59:00 +00001132 VG_(free) ( lc_markstack );
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +00001133}
1134
1135/*--------------------------------------------------------------------*/
njn1d0825f2006-03-27 11:37:07 +00001136/*--- end ---*/
njn43c799e2003-04-08 00:08:52 +00001137/*--------------------------------------------------------------------*/
1138