blob: 413b6f41b0cc25484f5861a636e54fb18e8b7979 [file] [log] [blame]
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +00001FileCheck - Flexible pattern matching file verifier
2===================================================
3
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +00004SYNOPSIS
5--------
6
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +00007:program:`FileCheck` *match-filename* [*--check-prefix=XXX*] [*--strict-whitespace*]
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +00008
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +00009DESCRIPTION
10-----------
11
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +000012:program:`FileCheck` reads two files (one from standard input, and one
13specified on the command line) and uses one to verify the other. This
14behavior is particularly useful for the testsuite, which wants to verify that
15the output of some tool (e.g. :program:`llc`) contains the expected information
16(for example, a movsd from esp or whatever is interesting). This is similar to
17using :program:`grep`, but it is optimized for matching multiple different
18inputs in one file in a specific order.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000019
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +000020The ``match-filename`` file specifies the file that contains the patterns to
Stephen Lina6e877f2013-07-14 18:12:25 +000021match. The file to verify is read from standard input unless the
22:option:`--input-file` option is used.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000023
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000024OPTIONS
25-------
26
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +000027.. option:: -help
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000028
29 Print a summary of command line options.
30
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +000031.. option:: --check-prefix prefix
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000032
Matt Arsenault13df4622013-11-10 02:04:09 +000033 FileCheck searches the contents of ``match-filename`` for patterns to
34 match. By default, these patterns are prefixed with "``CHECK:``".
35 If you'd like to use a different prefix (e.g. because the same input
36 file is checking multiple different tool or options), the
37 :option:`--check-prefix` argument allows you to specify one or more
38 prefixes to match. Multiple prefixes are useful for tests which might
39 change for different run options, but most lines remain the same.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000040
Daniel Sandersad875c22016-06-14 16:42:05 +000041.. option:: --check-prefixes prefix1,prefix2,...
42
43 An alias of :option:`--check-prefix` that allows multiple prefixes to be
44 specified as a comma separated list.
45
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +000046.. option:: --input-file filename
Eli Bendersky8a7e80f2012-11-07 01:41:30 +000047
48 File to check (defaults to stdin).
49
James Y Knight85913cc2016-02-11 16:46:09 +000050.. option:: --match-full-lines
51
52 By default, FileCheck allows matches of anywhere on a line. This
53 option will require all positive matches to cover an entire
54 line. Leading and trailing whitespace is ignored, unless
55 :option:`--strict-whitespace` is also specified. (Note: negative
56 matches from ``CHECK-NOT`` are not affected by this option!)
57
58 Passing this option is equivalent to inserting ``{{^ *}}`` or
59 ``{{^}}`` before, and ``{{ *$}}`` or ``{{$}}`` after every positive
60 check pattern.
61
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +000062.. option:: --strict-whitespace
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000063
64 By default, FileCheck canonicalizes input horizontal whitespace (spaces and
65 tabs) which causes it to ignore these differences (a space will match a tab).
Guy Benyei5ea04c32013-02-06 20:40:38 +000066 The :option:`--strict-whitespace` argument disables this behavior. End-of-line
Sean Silvab6bfbad2013-06-21 00:27:54 +000067 sequences are canonicalized to UNIX-style ``\n`` in all modes.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000068
Alexander Kornienko56ccdbb2014-07-11 12:39:32 +000069.. option:: --implicit-check-not check-pattern
70
71 Adds implicit negative checks for the specified patterns between positive
72 checks. The option allows writing stricter tests without stuffing them with
Dan Liewa762a132014-07-21 16:39:00 +000073 ``CHECK-NOT``\ s.
Alexander Kornienko56ccdbb2014-07-11 12:39:32 +000074
75 For example, "``--implicit-check-not warning:``" can be useful when testing
76 diagnostic messages from tools that don't have an option similar to ``clang
77 -verify``. With this option FileCheck will verify that input does not contain
78 warnings not covered by any ``CHECK:`` patterns.
79
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +000080.. option:: -version
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000081
82 Show the version number of this program.
83
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000084EXIT STATUS
85-----------
86
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +000087If :program:`FileCheck` verifies that the file matches the expected contents,
88it exits with 0. Otherwise, if not, or if an error occurs, it will exit with a
89non-zero value.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000090
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000091TUTORIAL
92--------
93
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000094FileCheck is typically used from LLVM regression tests, being invoked on the RUN
95line of the test. A simple example of using FileCheck from a RUN line looks
96like this:
97
Dmitri Gribenkoa99fa5b2012-06-12 15:45:07 +000098.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000099
100 ; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -march=x86-64 | FileCheck %s
101
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000102This syntax says to pipe the current file ("``%s``") into ``llvm-as``, pipe
103that into ``llc``, then pipe the output of ``llc`` into ``FileCheck``. This
104means that FileCheck will be verifying its standard input (the llc output)
105against the filename argument specified (the original ``.ll`` file specified by
106"``%s``"). To see how this works, let's look at the rest of the ``.ll`` file
107(after the RUN line):
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000108
Dmitri Gribenkoa99fa5b2012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000109.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000110
111 define void @sub1(i32* %p, i32 %v) {
112 entry:
113 ; CHECK: sub1:
114 ; CHECK: subl
115 %0 = tail call i32 @llvm.atomic.load.sub.i32.p0i32(i32* %p, i32 %v)
116 ret void
117 }
118
119 define void @inc4(i64* %p) {
120 entry:
121 ; CHECK: inc4:
122 ; CHECK: incq
123 %0 = tail call i64 @llvm.atomic.load.add.i64.p0i64(i64* %p, i64 1)
124 ret void
125 }
126
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000127Here you can see some "``CHECK:``" lines specified in comments. Now you can
128see how the file is piped into ``llvm-as``, then ``llc``, and the machine code
129output is what we are verifying. FileCheck checks the machine code output to
130verify that it matches what the "``CHECK:``" lines specify.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000131
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000132The syntax of the "``CHECK:``" lines is very simple: they are fixed strings that
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000133must occur in order. FileCheck defaults to ignoring horizontal whitespace
134differences (e.g. a space is allowed to match a tab) but otherwise, the contents
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000135of the "``CHECK:``" line is required to match some thing in the test file exactly.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000136
137One nice thing about FileCheck (compared to grep) is that it allows merging
138test cases together into logical groups. For example, because the test above
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000139is checking for the "``sub1:``" and "``inc4:``" labels, it will not match
140unless there is a "``subl``" in between those labels. If it existed somewhere
141else in the file, that would not count: "``grep subl``" matches if "``subl``"
142exists anywhere in the file.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000143
144The FileCheck -check-prefix option
145~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
146
Renato Golin124f2592016-07-20 12:16:38 +0000147The FileCheck `-check-prefix` option allows multiple test
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +0000148configurations to be driven from one `.ll` file. This is useful in many
149circumstances, for example, testing different architectural variants with
150:program:`llc`. Here's a simple example:
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000151
Dmitri Gribenkoa99fa5b2012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000152.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000153
154 ; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -mtriple=i686-apple-darwin9 -mattr=sse41 \
Dmitri Gribenko19408a72012-06-12 00:48:47 +0000155 ; RUN: | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=X32
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000156 ; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -mtriple=x86_64-apple-darwin9 -mattr=sse41 \
Dmitri Gribenko19408a72012-06-12 00:48:47 +0000157 ; RUN: | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=X64
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000158
159 define <4 x i32> @pinsrd_1(i32 %s, <4 x i32> %tmp) nounwind {
160 %tmp1 = insertelement <4 x i32>; %tmp, i32 %s, i32 1
161 ret <4 x i32> %tmp1
162 ; X32: pinsrd_1:
163 ; X32: pinsrd $1, 4(%esp), %xmm0
164
165 ; X64: pinsrd_1:
166 ; X64: pinsrd $1, %edi, %xmm0
167 }
168
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000169In this case, we're testing that we get the expected code generation with
170both 32-bit and 64-bit code generation.
171
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000172The "CHECK-NEXT:" directive
173~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
174
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000175Sometimes you want to match lines and would like to verify that matches
176happen on exactly consecutive lines with no other lines in between them. In
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000177this case, you can use "``CHECK:``" and "``CHECK-NEXT:``" directives to specify
178this. If you specified a custom check prefix, just use "``<PREFIX>-NEXT:``".
179For example, something like this works as you'd expect:
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000180
Dmitri Gribenkoa99fa5b2012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000181.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000182
Dmitri Gribenko19408a72012-06-12 00:48:47 +0000183 define void @t2(<2 x double>* %r, <2 x double>* %A, double %B) {
184 %tmp3 = load <2 x double>* %A, align 16
185 %tmp7 = insertelement <2 x double> undef, double %B, i32 0
186 %tmp9 = shufflevector <2 x double> %tmp3,
187 <2 x double> %tmp7,
188 <2 x i32> < i32 0, i32 2 >
189 store <2 x double> %tmp9, <2 x double>* %r, align 16
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000190 ret void
191
192 ; CHECK: t2:
193 ; CHECK: movl 8(%esp), %eax
194 ; CHECK-NEXT: movapd (%eax), %xmm0
195 ; CHECK-NEXT: movhpd 12(%esp), %xmm0
196 ; CHECK-NEXT: movl 4(%esp), %eax
197 ; CHECK-NEXT: movapd %xmm0, (%eax)
198 ; CHECK-NEXT: ret
199 }
200
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000201"``CHECK-NEXT:``" directives reject the input unless there is exactly one
Eli Bendersky2fef6b62012-11-21 22:40:52 +0000202newline between it and the previous directive. A "``CHECK-NEXT:``" cannot be
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000203the first directive in a file.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000204
Duncan P. N. Exon Smithcffbbe92015-03-05 17:00:05 +0000205The "CHECK-SAME:" directive
206~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
207
208Sometimes you want to match lines and would like to verify that matches happen
209on the same line as the previous match. In this case, you can use "``CHECK:``"
210and "``CHECK-SAME:``" directives to specify this. If you specified a custom
211check prefix, just use "``<PREFIX>-SAME:``".
212
213"``CHECK-SAME:``" is particularly powerful in conjunction with "``CHECK-NOT:``"
214(described below).
215
216For example, the following works like you'd expect:
217
218.. code-block:: llvm
219
Duncan P. N. Exon Smitha9308c42015-04-29 16:38:44 +0000220 !0 = !DILocation(line: 5, scope: !1, inlinedAt: !2)
Duncan P. N. Exon Smithcffbbe92015-03-05 17:00:05 +0000221
Duncan P. N. Exon Smitha9308c42015-04-29 16:38:44 +0000222 ; CHECK: !DILocation(line: 5,
Duncan P. N. Exon Smithcffbbe92015-03-05 17:00:05 +0000223 ; CHECK-NOT: column:
224 ; CHECK-SAME: scope: ![[SCOPE:[0-9]+]]
225
226"``CHECK-SAME:``" directives reject the input if there are any newlines between
227it and the previous directive. A "``CHECK-SAME:``" cannot be the first
228directive in a file.
229
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000230The "CHECK-NOT:" directive
231~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
232
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000233The "``CHECK-NOT:``" directive is used to verify that a string doesn't occur
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000234between two matches (or before the first match, or after the last match). For
235example, to verify that a load is removed by a transformation, a test like this
236can be used:
237
Dmitri Gribenkoa99fa5b2012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000238.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000239
240 define i8 @coerce_offset0(i32 %V, i32* %P) {
241 store i32 %V, i32* %P
242
243 %P2 = bitcast i32* %P to i8*
244 %P3 = getelementptr i8* %P2, i32 2
245
246 %A = load i8* %P3
247 ret i8 %A
248 ; CHECK: @coerce_offset0
249 ; CHECK-NOT: load
250 ; CHECK: ret i8
251 }
252
Michael Liao91a1b2c2013-05-14 20:34:12 +0000253The "CHECK-DAG:" directive
254~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
255
256If it's necessary to match strings that don't occur in a strictly sequential
257order, "``CHECK-DAG:``" could be used to verify them between two matches (or
258before the first match, or after the last match). For example, clang emits
259vtable globals in reverse order. Using ``CHECK-DAG:``, we can keep the checks
260in the natural order:
261
262.. code-block:: c++
263
264 // RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -emit-llvm -o - | FileCheck %s
265
266 struct Foo { virtual void method(); };
267 Foo f; // emit vtable
268 // CHECK-DAG: @_ZTV3Foo =
269
270 struct Bar { virtual void method(); };
271 Bar b;
272 // CHECK-DAG: @_ZTV3Bar =
273
Renato Golin58ab84a2013-10-11 18:50:22 +0000274``CHECK-NOT:`` directives could be mixed with ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives to
275exclude strings between the surrounding ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives. As a result,
276the surrounding ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives cannot be reordered, i.e. all
277occurrences matching ``CHECK-DAG:`` before ``CHECK-NOT:`` must not fall behind
278occurrences matching ``CHECK-DAG:`` after ``CHECK-NOT:``. For example,
279
280.. code-block:: llvm
281
282 ; CHECK-DAG: BEFORE
283 ; CHECK-NOT: NOT
284 ; CHECK-DAG: AFTER
285
286This case will reject input strings where ``BEFORE`` occurs after ``AFTER``.
Michael Liao91a1b2c2013-05-14 20:34:12 +0000287
288With captured variables, ``CHECK-DAG:`` is able to match valid topological
289orderings of a DAG with edges from the definition of a variable to its use.
290It's useful, e.g., when your test cases need to match different output
291sequences from the instruction scheduler. For example,
292
293.. code-block:: llvm
294
295 ; CHECK-DAG: add [[REG1:r[0-9]+]], r1, r2
296 ; CHECK-DAG: add [[REG2:r[0-9]+]], r3, r4
297 ; CHECK: mul r5, [[REG1]], [[REG2]]
298
299In this case, any order of that two ``add`` instructions will be allowed.
300
Renato Golin58ab84a2013-10-11 18:50:22 +0000301If you are defining `and` using variables in the same ``CHECK-DAG:`` block,
302be aware that the definition rule can match `after` its use.
303
304So, for instance, the code below will pass:
Michael Liao91a1b2c2013-05-14 20:34:12 +0000305
Renato Golin124f2592016-07-20 12:16:38 +0000306.. code-block:: text
Michael Liao91a1b2c2013-05-14 20:34:12 +0000307
Renato Golin58ab84a2013-10-11 18:50:22 +0000308 ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2:d[0-9]+]][0]
309 ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2]][1]
310 vmov.32 d0[1]
311 vmov.32 d0[0]
Michael Liao91a1b2c2013-05-14 20:34:12 +0000312
Renato Golin58ab84a2013-10-11 18:50:22 +0000313While this other code, will not:
314
Renato Golin124f2592016-07-20 12:16:38 +0000315.. code-block:: text
Renato Golin58ab84a2013-10-11 18:50:22 +0000316
317 ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2:d[0-9]+]][0]
318 ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2]][1]
319 vmov.32 d1[1]
320 vmov.32 d0[0]
321
322While this can be very useful, it's also dangerous, because in the case of
323register sequence, you must have a strong order (read before write, copy before
324use, etc). If the definition your test is looking for doesn't match (because
325of a bug in the compiler), it may match further away from the use, and mask
326real bugs away.
327
328In those cases, to enforce the order, use a non-DAG directive between DAG-blocks.
Michael Liao91a1b2c2013-05-14 20:34:12 +0000329
Stephen Linf8bd2e52013-07-12 14:51:05 +0000330The "CHECK-LABEL:" directive
Bill Wendlingc02da462013-07-30 08:26:24 +0000331~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Stephen Linf8bd2e52013-07-12 14:51:05 +0000332
333Sometimes in a file containing multiple tests divided into logical blocks, one
334or more ``CHECK:`` directives may inadvertently succeed by matching lines in a
335later block. While an error will usually eventually be generated, the check
336flagged as causing the error may not actually bear any relationship to the
337actual source of the problem.
338
339In order to produce better error messages in these cases, the "``CHECK-LABEL:``"
340directive can be used. It is treated identically to a normal ``CHECK``
Stephen Linb9464072013-07-18 23:26:58 +0000341directive except that FileCheck makes an additional assumption that a line
342matched by the directive cannot also be matched by any other check present in
343``match-filename``; this is intended to be used for lines containing labels or
344other unique identifiers. Conceptually, the presence of ``CHECK-LABEL`` divides
345the input stream into separate blocks, each of which is processed independently,
346preventing a ``CHECK:`` directive in one block matching a line in another block.
347For example,
Stephen Linf8bd2e52013-07-12 14:51:05 +0000348
349.. code-block:: llvm
350
351 define %struct.C* @C_ctor_base(%struct.C* %this, i32 %x) {
352 entry:
353 ; CHECK-LABEL: C_ctor_base:
354 ; CHECK: mov [[SAVETHIS:r[0-9]+]], r0
355 ; CHECK: bl A_ctor_base
356 ; CHECK: mov r0, [[SAVETHIS]]
357 %0 = bitcast %struct.C* %this to %struct.A*
358 %call = tail call %struct.A* @A_ctor_base(%struct.A* %0)
359 %1 = bitcast %struct.C* %this to %struct.B*
360 %call2 = tail call %struct.B* @B_ctor_base(%struct.B* %1, i32 %x)
361 ret %struct.C* %this
362 }
363
364 define %struct.D* @D_ctor_base(%struct.D* %this, i32 %x) {
365 entry:
366 ; CHECK-LABEL: D_ctor_base:
367
368The use of ``CHECK-LABEL:`` directives in this case ensures that the three
369``CHECK:`` directives only accept lines corresponding to the body of the
370``@C_ctor_base`` function, even if the patterns match lines found later in
Stephen Linb9464072013-07-18 23:26:58 +0000371the file. Furthermore, if one of these three ``CHECK:`` directives fail,
372FileCheck will recover by continuing to the next block, allowing multiple test
373failures to be detected in a single invocation.
Stephen Linf8bd2e52013-07-12 14:51:05 +0000374
375There is no requirement that ``CHECK-LABEL:`` directives contain strings that
376correspond to actual syntactic labels in a source or output language: they must
377simply uniquely match a single line in the file being verified.
378
379``CHECK-LABEL:`` directives cannot contain variable definitions or uses.
380
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000381FileCheck Pattern Matching Syntax
382~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
383
Paul Robinson282b3d32015-03-05 23:04:26 +0000384All FileCheck directives take a pattern to match.
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000385For most uses of FileCheck, fixed string matching is perfectly sufficient. For
386some things, a more flexible form of matching is desired. To support this,
387FileCheck allows you to specify regular expressions in matching strings,
388surrounded by double braces: ``{{yourregex}}``. Because we want to use fixed
389string matching for a majority of what we do, FileCheck has been designed to
390support mixing and matching fixed string matching with regular expressions.
391This allows you to write things like this:
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000392
Dmitri Gribenkoa99fa5b2012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000393.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000394
395 ; CHECK: movhpd {{[0-9]+}}(%esp), {{%xmm[0-7]}}
396
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000397In this case, any offset from the ESP register will be allowed, and any xmm
398register will be allowed.
399
400Because regular expressions are enclosed with double braces, they are
401visually distinct, and you don't need to use escape characters within the double
402braces like you would in C. In the rare case that you want to match double
403braces explicitly from the input, you can use something ugly like
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000404``{{[{][{]}}`` as your pattern.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000405
406FileCheck Variables
407~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
408
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000409It is often useful to match a pattern and then verify that it occurs again
410later in the file. For codegen tests, this can be useful to allow any register,
Eli Bendersky4ca99ba2012-12-01 22:03:57 +0000411but verify that that register is used consistently later. To do this,
412:program:`FileCheck` allows named variables to be defined and substituted into
413patterns. Here is a simple example:
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000414
Dmitri Gribenkoa99fa5b2012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000415.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000416
417 ; CHECK: test5:
418 ; CHECK: notw [[REGISTER:%[a-z]+]]
Chad Rosierfd7469c2012-05-24 21:17:47 +0000419 ; CHECK: andw {{.*}}[[REGISTER]]
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000420
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000421The first check line matches a regex ``%[a-z]+`` and captures it into the
422variable ``REGISTER``. The second line verifies that whatever is in
Eli Bendersky4ca99ba2012-12-01 22:03:57 +0000423``REGISTER`` occurs later in the file after an "``andw``". :program:`FileCheck`
424variable references are always contained in ``[[ ]]`` pairs, and their names can
425be formed with the regex ``[a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z0-9]*``. If a colon follows the name,
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000426then it is a definition of the variable; otherwise, it is a use.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000427
Eli Bendersky4ca99ba2012-12-01 22:03:57 +0000428:program:`FileCheck` variables can be defined multiple times, and uses always
429get the latest value. Variables can also be used later on the same line they
430were defined on. For example:
431
432.. code-block:: llvm
433
434 ; CHECK: op [[REG:r[0-9]+]], [[REG]]
435
436Can be useful if you want the operands of ``op`` to be the same register,
437and don't care exactly which register it is.
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000438
Alexander Kornienko92987fb2012-11-14 21:07:37 +0000439FileCheck Expressions
440~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
441
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +0000442Sometimes there's a need to verify output which refers line numbers of the
443match file, e.g. when testing compiler diagnostics. This introduces a certain
444fragility of the match file structure, as "``CHECK:``" lines contain absolute
445line numbers in the same file, which have to be updated whenever line numbers
446change due to text addition or deletion.
Alexander Kornienko92987fb2012-11-14 21:07:37 +0000447
448To support this case, FileCheck allows using ``[[@LINE]]``,
449``[[@LINE+<offset>]]``, ``[[@LINE-<offset>]]`` expressions in patterns. These
450expressions expand to a number of the line where a pattern is located (with an
451optional integer offset).
452
453This way match patterns can be put near the relevant test lines and include
454relative line number references, for example:
455
456.. code-block:: c++
457
458 // CHECK: test.cpp:[[@LINE+4]]:6: error: expected ';' after top level declarator
459 // CHECK-NEXT: {{^int a}}
460 // CHECK-NEXT: {{^ \^}}
461 // CHECK-NEXT: {{^ ;}}
462 int a
463
Wolfgang Pieb0b4509e2016-06-27 23:59:00 +0000464Matching Newline Characters
465~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
466
467To match newline characters in regular expressions the character class
468``[[:space:]]`` can be used. For example, the following pattern:
469
470.. code-block:: c++
471
472 // CHECK: DW_AT_location [DW_FORM_sec_offset] ([[DLOC:0x[0-9a-f]+]]){{[[:space:]].*}}"intd"
473
474matches output of the form (from llvm-dwarfdump):
475
Renato Golin124f2592016-07-20 12:16:38 +0000476.. code-block:: text
Wolfgang Pieb0b4509e2016-06-27 23:59:00 +0000477
478 DW_AT_location [DW_FORM_sec_offset] (0x00000233)
479 DW_AT_name [DW_FORM_strp] ( .debug_str[0x000000c9] = "intd")
480
481letting us set the :program:`FileCheck` variable ``DLOC`` to the desired value
482``0x00000233``, extracted from the line immediately preceding "``intd``".