blob: 75df8a6226893050345619bf7c0db90d610ad449 [file] [log] [blame]
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +00001FileCheck - Flexible pattern matching file verifier
2===================================================
3
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +00004SYNOPSIS
5--------
6
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +00007:program:`FileCheck` *match-filename* [*--check-prefix=XXX*] [*--strict-whitespace*]
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +00008
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +00009DESCRIPTION
10-----------
11
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +000012:program:`FileCheck` reads two files (one from standard input, and one
13specified on the command line) and uses one to verify the other. This
14behavior is particularly useful for the testsuite, which wants to verify that
15the output of some tool (e.g. :program:`llc`) contains the expected information
16(for example, a movsd from esp or whatever is interesting). This is similar to
17using :program:`grep`, but it is optimized for matching multiple different
18inputs in one file in a specific order.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000019
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +000020The ``match-filename`` file specifies the file that contains the patterns to
Stephen Lina6e877f2013-07-14 18:12:25 +000021match. The file to verify is read from standard input unless the
22:option:`--input-file` option is used.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000023
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000024OPTIONS
25-------
26
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +000027.. option:: -help
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000028
29 Print a summary of command line options.
30
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +000031.. option:: --check-prefix prefix
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000032
Matt Arsenault13df4622013-11-10 02:04:09 +000033 FileCheck searches the contents of ``match-filename`` for patterns to
34 match. By default, these patterns are prefixed with "``CHECK:``".
35 If you'd like to use a different prefix (e.g. because the same input
36 file is checking multiple different tool or options), the
37 :option:`--check-prefix` argument allows you to specify one or more
38 prefixes to match. Multiple prefixes are useful for tests which might
39 change for different run options, but most lines remain the same.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000040
Daniel Sandersad875c22016-06-14 16:42:05 +000041.. option:: --check-prefixes prefix1,prefix2,...
42
43 An alias of :option:`--check-prefix` that allows multiple prefixes to be
44 specified as a comma separated list.
45
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +000046.. option:: --input-file filename
Eli Bendersky8a7e80f2012-11-07 01:41:30 +000047
48 File to check (defaults to stdin).
49
James Y Knight85913cc2016-02-11 16:46:09 +000050.. option:: --match-full-lines
51
52 By default, FileCheck allows matches of anywhere on a line. This
53 option will require all positive matches to cover an entire
54 line. Leading and trailing whitespace is ignored, unless
55 :option:`--strict-whitespace` is also specified. (Note: negative
56 matches from ``CHECK-NOT`` are not affected by this option!)
57
58 Passing this option is equivalent to inserting ``{{^ *}}`` or
59 ``{{^}}`` before, and ``{{ *$}}`` or ``{{$}}`` after every positive
60 check pattern.
61
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +000062.. option:: --strict-whitespace
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000063
64 By default, FileCheck canonicalizes input horizontal whitespace (spaces and
65 tabs) which causes it to ignore these differences (a space will match a tab).
Guy Benyei5ea04c32013-02-06 20:40:38 +000066 The :option:`--strict-whitespace` argument disables this behavior. End-of-line
Sean Silvab6bfbad2013-06-21 00:27:54 +000067 sequences are canonicalized to UNIX-style ``\n`` in all modes.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000068
Alexander Kornienko56ccdbb2014-07-11 12:39:32 +000069.. option:: --implicit-check-not check-pattern
70
71 Adds implicit negative checks for the specified patterns between positive
72 checks. The option allows writing stricter tests without stuffing them with
Dan Liewa762a132014-07-21 16:39:00 +000073 ``CHECK-NOT``\ s.
Alexander Kornienko56ccdbb2014-07-11 12:39:32 +000074
75 For example, "``--implicit-check-not warning:``" can be useful when testing
76 diagnostic messages from tools that don't have an option similar to ``clang
77 -verify``. With this option FileCheck will verify that input does not contain
78 warnings not covered by any ``CHECK:`` patterns.
79
George Karpenkov346dfbe2018-07-20 20:21:57 +000080.. option:: --dump-input-on-failure
81
82 When the check fails, dump all of the original input.
83
Artem Belevichf55e72a2017-03-09 17:59:04 +000084.. option:: --enable-var-scope
85
86 Enables scope for regex variables.
87
88 Variables with names that start with ``$`` are considered global and
89 remain set throughout the file.
90
91 All other variables get undefined after each encountered ``CHECK-LABEL``.
92
Alexander Richardson46e1fd62017-11-07 13:24:44 +000093.. option:: -D<VAR=VALUE>
94
95 Sets a filecheck variable ``VAR`` with value ``VALUE`` that can be used in
96 ``CHECK:`` lines.
97
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +000098.. option:: -version
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000099
100 Show the version number of this program.
101
Joel E. Dennydc5ba312018-07-13 03:08:23 +0000102.. option:: -v
103
104 Print directive pattern matches.
105
106.. option:: -vv
107
108 Print information helpful in diagnosing internal FileCheck issues, such as
109 discarded overlapping ``CHECK-DAG:`` matches, implicit EOF pattern matches,
110 and ``CHECK-NOT:`` patterns that do not have matches. Implies ``-v``.
111
Joel E. Dennybcf5b442018-07-11 20:27:27 +0000112.. option:: --allow-deprecated-dag-overlap
113
114 Enable overlapping among matches in a group of consecutive ``CHECK-DAG:``
115 directives. This option is deprecated and is only provided for convenience
116 as old tests are migrated to the new non-overlapping ``CHECK-DAG:``
117 implementation.
118
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000119EXIT STATUS
120-----------
121
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +0000122If :program:`FileCheck` verifies that the file matches the expected contents,
123it exits with 0. Otherwise, if not, or if an error occurs, it will exit with a
124non-zero value.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000125
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000126TUTORIAL
127--------
128
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000129FileCheck is typically used from LLVM regression tests, being invoked on the RUN
130line of the test. A simple example of using FileCheck from a RUN line looks
131like this:
132
Dmitri Gribenkoa99fa5b2012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000133.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000134
135 ; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -march=x86-64 | FileCheck %s
136
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000137This syntax says to pipe the current file ("``%s``") into ``llvm-as``, pipe
138that into ``llc``, then pipe the output of ``llc`` into ``FileCheck``. This
139means that FileCheck will be verifying its standard input (the llc output)
140against the filename argument specified (the original ``.ll`` file specified by
141"``%s``"). To see how this works, let's look at the rest of the ``.ll`` file
142(after the RUN line):
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000143
Dmitri Gribenkoa99fa5b2012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000144.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000145
146 define void @sub1(i32* %p, i32 %v) {
147 entry:
148 ; CHECK: sub1:
149 ; CHECK: subl
150 %0 = tail call i32 @llvm.atomic.load.sub.i32.p0i32(i32* %p, i32 %v)
151 ret void
152 }
153
154 define void @inc4(i64* %p) {
155 entry:
156 ; CHECK: inc4:
157 ; CHECK: incq
158 %0 = tail call i64 @llvm.atomic.load.add.i64.p0i64(i64* %p, i64 1)
159 ret void
160 }
161
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000162Here you can see some "``CHECK:``" lines specified in comments. Now you can
163see how the file is piped into ``llvm-as``, then ``llc``, and the machine code
164output is what we are verifying. FileCheck checks the machine code output to
165verify that it matches what the "``CHECK:``" lines specify.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000166
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000167The syntax of the "``CHECK:``" lines is very simple: they are fixed strings that
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000168must occur in order. FileCheck defaults to ignoring horizontal whitespace
169differences (e.g. a space is allowed to match a tab) but otherwise, the contents
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000170of the "``CHECK:``" line is required to match some thing in the test file exactly.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000171
172One nice thing about FileCheck (compared to grep) is that it allows merging
173test cases together into logical groups. For example, because the test above
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000174is checking for the "``sub1:``" and "``inc4:``" labels, it will not match
175unless there is a "``subl``" in between those labels. If it existed somewhere
176else in the file, that would not count: "``grep subl``" matches if "``subl``"
177exists anywhere in the file.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000178
179The FileCheck -check-prefix option
180~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
181
Renato Golin124f2592016-07-20 12:16:38 +0000182The FileCheck `-check-prefix` option allows multiple test
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +0000183configurations to be driven from one `.ll` file. This is useful in many
184circumstances, for example, testing different architectural variants with
185:program:`llc`. Here's a simple example:
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000186
Dmitri Gribenkoa99fa5b2012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000187.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000188
189 ; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -mtriple=i686-apple-darwin9 -mattr=sse41 \
Dmitri Gribenko19408a72012-06-12 00:48:47 +0000190 ; RUN: | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=X32
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000191 ; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -mtriple=x86_64-apple-darwin9 -mattr=sse41 \
Dmitri Gribenko19408a72012-06-12 00:48:47 +0000192 ; RUN: | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=X64
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000193
194 define <4 x i32> @pinsrd_1(i32 %s, <4 x i32> %tmp) nounwind {
195 %tmp1 = insertelement <4 x i32>; %tmp, i32 %s, i32 1
196 ret <4 x i32> %tmp1
197 ; X32: pinsrd_1:
198 ; X32: pinsrd $1, 4(%esp), %xmm0
199
200 ; X64: pinsrd_1:
201 ; X64: pinsrd $1, %edi, %xmm0
202 }
203
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000204In this case, we're testing that we get the expected code generation with
205both 32-bit and 64-bit code generation.
206
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000207The "CHECK-NEXT:" directive
208~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
209
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000210Sometimes you want to match lines and would like to verify that matches
211happen on exactly consecutive lines with no other lines in between them. In
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000212this case, you can use "``CHECK:``" and "``CHECK-NEXT:``" directives to specify
213this. If you specified a custom check prefix, just use "``<PREFIX>-NEXT:``".
214For example, something like this works as you'd expect:
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000215
Dmitri Gribenkoa99fa5b2012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000216.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000217
Dmitri Gribenko19408a72012-06-12 00:48:47 +0000218 define void @t2(<2 x double>* %r, <2 x double>* %A, double %B) {
219 %tmp3 = load <2 x double>* %A, align 16
220 %tmp7 = insertelement <2 x double> undef, double %B, i32 0
221 %tmp9 = shufflevector <2 x double> %tmp3,
222 <2 x double> %tmp7,
223 <2 x i32> < i32 0, i32 2 >
224 store <2 x double> %tmp9, <2 x double>* %r, align 16
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000225 ret void
226
227 ; CHECK: t2:
228 ; CHECK: movl 8(%esp), %eax
229 ; CHECK-NEXT: movapd (%eax), %xmm0
230 ; CHECK-NEXT: movhpd 12(%esp), %xmm0
231 ; CHECK-NEXT: movl 4(%esp), %eax
232 ; CHECK-NEXT: movapd %xmm0, (%eax)
233 ; CHECK-NEXT: ret
234 }
235
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000236"``CHECK-NEXT:``" directives reject the input unless there is exactly one
Eli Bendersky2fef6b62012-11-21 22:40:52 +0000237newline between it and the previous directive. A "``CHECK-NEXT:``" cannot be
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000238the first directive in a file.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000239
Duncan P. N. Exon Smithcffbbe92015-03-05 17:00:05 +0000240The "CHECK-SAME:" directive
241~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
242
243Sometimes you want to match lines and would like to verify that matches happen
244on the same line as the previous match. In this case, you can use "``CHECK:``"
245and "``CHECK-SAME:``" directives to specify this. If you specified a custom
246check prefix, just use "``<PREFIX>-SAME:``".
247
248"``CHECK-SAME:``" is particularly powerful in conjunction with "``CHECK-NOT:``"
249(described below).
250
251For example, the following works like you'd expect:
252
253.. code-block:: llvm
254
Duncan P. N. Exon Smitha9308c42015-04-29 16:38:44 +0000255 !0 = !DILocation(line: 5, scope: !1, inlinedAt: !2)
Duncan P. N. Exon Smithcffbbe92015-03-05 17:00:05 +0000256
Duncan P. N. Exon Smitha9308c42015-04-29 16:38:44 +0000257 ; CHECK: !DILocation(line: 5,
Duncan P. N. Exon Smithcffbbe92015-03-05 17:00:05 +0000258 ; CHECK-NOT: column:
259 ; CHECK-SAME: scope: ![[SCOPE:[0-9]+]]
260
261"``CHECK-SAME:``" directives reject the input if there are any newlines between
262it and the previous directive. A "``CHECK-SAME:``" cannot be the first
263directive in a file.
264
James Henderson5507f662018-06-26 15:15:45 +0000265The "CHECK-EMPTY:" directive
James Hendersonc307b002018-06-26 15:29:09 +0000266~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
James Henderson5507f662018-06-26 15:15:45 +0000267
268If you need to check that the next line has nothing on it, not even whitespace,
269you can use the "``CHECK-EMPTY:``" directive.
270
271.. code-block:: llvm
272
Chandler Carruthef705b72018-08-06 01:41:25 +0000273 declare void @foo()
James Henderson5507f662018-06-26 15:15:45 +0000274
Chandler Carruthef705b72018-08-06 01:41:25 +0000275 declare void @bar()
James Henderson5507f662018-06-26 15:15:45 +0000276 ; CHECK: foo
277 ; CHECK-EMPTY:
278 ; CHECK-NEXT: bar
279
280Just like "``CHECK-NEXT:``" the directive will fail if there is more than one
281newline before it finds the next blank line, and it cannot be the first
282directive in a file.
283
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000284The "CHECK-NOT:" directive
285~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
286
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000287The "``CHECK-NOT:``" directive is used to verify that a string doesn't occur
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000288between two matches (or before the first match, or after the last match). For
289example, to verify that a load is removed by a transformation, a test like this
290can be used:
291
Dmitri Gribenkoa99fa5b2012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000292.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000293
294 define i8 @coerce_offset0(i32 %V, i32* %P) {
295 store i32 %V, i32* %P
296
297 %P2 = bitcast i32* %P to i8*
298 %P3 = getelementptr i8* %P2, i32 2
299
300 %A = load i8* %P3
301 ret i8 %A
302 ; CHECK: @coerce_offset0
303 ; CHECK-NOT: load
304 ; CHECK: ret i8
305 }
306
Michael Liao91a1b2c2013-05-14 20:34:12 +0000307The "CHECK-DAG:" directive
308~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
309
310If it's necessary to match strings that don't occur in a strictly sequential
311order, "``CHECK-DAG:``" could be used to verify them between two matches (or
312before the first match, or after the last match). For example, clang emits
313vtable globals in reverse order. Using ``CHECK-DAG:``, we can keep the checks
314in the natural order:
315
316.. code-block:: c++
317
318 // RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -emit-llvm -o - | FileCheck %s
319
320 struct Foo { virtual void method(); };
321 Foo f; // emit vtable
322 // CHECK-DAG: @_ZTV3Foo =
323
324 struct Bar { virtual void method(); };
325 Bar b;
326 // CHECK-DAG: @_ZTV3Bar =
327
Renato Golin58ab84a2013-10-11 18:50:22 +0000328``CHECK-NOT:`` directives could be mixed with ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives to
329exclude strings between the surrounding ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives. As a result,
330the surrounding ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives cannot be reordered, i.e. all
331occurrences matching ``CHECK-DAG:`` before ``CHECK-NOT:`` must not fall behind
332occurrences matching ``CHECK-DAG:`` after ``CHECK-NOT:``. For example,
333
334.. code-block:: llvm
335
336 ; CHECK-DAG: BEFORE
337 ; CHECK-NOT: NOT
338 ; CHECK-DAG: AFTER
339
340This case will reject input strings where ``BEFORE`` occurs after ``AFTER``.
Michael Liao91a1b2c2013-05-14 20:34:12 +0000341
342With captured variables, ``CHECK-DAG:`` is able to match valid topological
343orderings of a DAG with edges from the definition of a variable to its use.
344It's useful, e.g., when your test cases need to match different output
345sequences from the instruction scheduler. For example,
346
347.. code-block:: llvm
348
349 ; CHECK-DAG: add [[REG1:r[0-9]+]], r1, r2
350 ; CHECK-DAG: add [[REG2:r[0-9]+]], r3, r4
351 ; CHECK: mul r5, [[REG1]], [[REG2]]
352
353In this case, any order of that two ``add`` instructions will be allowed.
354
Renato Golin58ab84a2013-10-11 18:50:22 +0000355If you are defining `and` using variables in the same ``CHECK-DAG:`` block,
356be aware that the definition rule can match `after` its use.
357
358So, for instance, the code below will pass:
Michael Liao91a1b2c2013-05-14 20:34:12 +0000359
Renato Golin124f2592016-07-20 12:16:38 +0000360.. code-block:: text
Michael Liao91a1b2c2013-05-14 20:34:12 +0000361
Renato Golin58ab84a2013-10-11 18:50:22 +0000362 ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2:d[0-9]+]][0]
363 ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2]][1]
364 vmov.32 d0[1]
365 vmov.32 d0[0]
Michael Liao91a1b2c2013-05-14 20:34:12 +0000366
Renato Golin58ab84a2013-10-11 18:50:22 +0000367While this other code, will not:
368
Renato Golin124f2592016-07-20 12:16:38 +0000369.. code-block:: text
Renato Golin58ab84a2013-10-11 18:50:22 +0000370
371 ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2:d[0-9]+]][0]
372 ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2]][1]
373 vmov.32 d1[1]
374 vmov.32 d0[0]
375
376While this can be very useful, it's also dangerous, because in the case of
377register sequence, you must have a strong order (read before write, copy before
378use, etc). If the definition your test is looking for doesn't match (because
379of a bug in the compiler), it may match further away from the use, and mask
380real bugs away.
381
382In those cases, to enforce the order, use a non-DAG directive between DAG-blocks.
Michael Liao91a1b2c2013-05-14 20:34:12 +0000383
Joel E. Dennybcf5b442018-07-11 20:27:27 +0000384A ``CHECK-DAG:`` directive skips matches that overlap the matches of any
385preceding ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives in the same ``CHECK-DAG:`` block. Not only
386is this non-overlapping behavior consistent with other directives, but it's
387also necessary to handle sets of non-unique strings or patterns. For example,
388the following directives look for unordered log entries for two tasks in a
389parallel program, such as the OpenMP runtime:
390
391.. code-block:: text
392
393 // CHECK-DAG: [[THREAD_ID:[0-9]+]]: task_begin
394 // CHECK-DAG: [[THREAD_ID]]: task_end
395 //
396 // CHECK-DAG: [[THREAD_ID:[0-9]+]]: task_begin
397 // CHECK-DAG: [[THREAD_ID]]: task_end
398
399The second pair of directives is guaranteed not to match the same log entries
400as the first pair even though the patterns are identical and even if the text
401of the log entries is identical because the thread ID manages to be reused.
402
Stephen Linf8bd2e52013-07-12 14:51:05 +0000403The "CHECK-LABEL:" directive
Bill Wendlingc02da462013-07-30 08:26:24 +0000404~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Stephen Linf8bd2e52013-07-12 14:51:05 +0000405
406Sometimes in a file containing multiple tests divided into logical blocks, one
407or more ``CHECK:`` directives may inadvertently succeed by matching lines in a
408later block. While an error will usually eventually be generated, the check
409flagged as causing the error may not actually bear any relationship to the
410actual source of the problem.
411
412In order to produce better error messages in these cases, the "``CHECK-LABEL:``"
413directive can be used. It is treated identically to a normal ``CHECK``
Stephen Linb9464072013-07-18 23:26:58 +0000414directive except that FileCheck makes an additional assumption that a line
415matched by the directive cannot also be matched by any other check present in
416``match-filename``; this is intended to be used for lines containing labels or
417other unique identifiers. Conceptually, the presence of ``CHECK-LABEL`` divides
418the input stream into separate blocks, each of which is processed independently,
419preventing a ``CHECK:`` directive in one block matching a line in another block.
Artem Belevichf55e72a2017-03-09 17:59:04 +0000420If ``--enable-var-scope`` is in effect, all local variables are cleared at the
421beginning of the block.
422
Stephen Linb9464072013-07-18 23:26:58 +0000423For example,
Stephen Linf8bd2e52013-07-12 14:51:05 +0000424
425.. code-block:: llvm
426
427 define %struct.C* @C_ctor_base(%struct.C* %this, i32 %x) {
428 entry:
429 ; CHECK-LABEL: C_ctor_base:
430 ; CHECK: mov [[SAVETHIS:r[0-9]+]], r0
431 ; CHECK: bl A_ctor_base
432 ; CHECK: mov r0, [[SAVETHIS]]
433 %0 = bitcast %struct.C* %this to %struct.A*
434 %call = tail call %struct.A* @A_ctor_base(%struct.A* %0)
435 %1 = bitcast %struct.C* %this to %struct.B*
436 %call2 = tail call %struct.B* @B_ctor_base(%struct.B* %1, i32 %x)
437 ret %struct.C* %this
438 }
439
440 define %struct.D* @D_ctor_base(%struct.D* %this, i32 %x) {
441 entry:
442 ; CHECK-LABEL: D_ctor_base:
443
444The use of ``CHECK-LABEL:`` directives in this case ensures that the three
445``CHECK:`` directives only accept lines corresponding to the body of the
446``@C_ctor_base`` function, even if the patterns match lines found later in
Stephen Linb9464072013-07-18 23:26:58 +0000447the file. Furthermore, if one of these three ``CHECK:`` directives fail,
448FileCheck will recover by continuing to the next block, allowing multiple test
449failures to be detected in a single invocation.
Stephen Linf8bd2e52013-07-12 14:51:05 +0000450
451There is no requirement that ``CHECK-LABEL:`` directives contain strings that
452correspond to actual syntactic labels in a source or output language: they must
453simply uniquely match a single line in the file being verified.
454
455``CHECK-LABEL:`` directives cannot contain variable definitions or uses.
456
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000457FileCheck Pattern Matching Syntax
458~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
459
Paul Robinson282b3d32015-03-05 23:04:26 +0000460All FileCheck directives take a pattern to match.
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000461For most uses of FileCheck, fixed string matching is perfectly sufficient. For
462some things, a more flexible form of matching is desired. To support this,
463FileCheck allows you to specify regular expressions in matching strings,
Sjoerd Meijer9a26a7e2017-10-13 14:02:36 +0000464surrounded by double braces: ``{{yourregex}}``. FileCheck implements a POSIX
465regular expression matcher; it supports Extended POSIX regular expressions
466(ERE). Because we want to use fixed string matching for a majority of what we
467do, FileCheck has been designed to support mixing and matching fixed string
468matching with regular expressions. This allows you to write things like this:
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000469
Dmitri Gribenkoa99fa5b2012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000470.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000471
472 ; CHECK: movhpd {{[0-9]+}}(%esp), {{%xmm[0-7]}}
473
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000474In this case, any offset from the ESP register will be allowed, and any xmm
475register will be allowed.
476
477Because regular expressions are enclosed with double braces, they are
478visually distinct, and you don't need to use escape characters within the double
479braces like you would in C. In the rare case that you want to match double
480braces explicitly from the input, you can use something ugly like
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000481``{{[{][{]}}`` as your pattern.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000482
483FileCheck Variables
484~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
485
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000486It is often useful to match a pattern and then verify that it occurs again
487later in the file. For codegen tests, this can be useful to allow any register,
Eli Bendersky4ca99ba2012-12-01 22:03:57 +0000488but verify that that register is used consistently later. To do this,
489:program:`FileCheck` allows named variables to be defined and substituted into
490patterns. Here is a simple example:
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000491
Dmitri Gribenkoa99fa5b2012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000492.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000493
494 ; CHECK: test5:
495 ; CHECK: notw [[REGISTER:%[a-z]+]]
Chad Rosierfd7469c2012-05-24 21:17:47 +0000496 ; CHECK: andw {{.*}}[[REGISTER]]
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000497
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000498The first check line matches a regex ``%[a-z]+`` and captures it into the
499variable ``REGISTER``. The second line verifies that whatever is in
Eli Bendersky4ca99ba2012-12-01 22:03:57 +0000500``REGISTER`` occurs later in the file after an "``andw``". :program:`FileCheck`
501variable references are always contained in ``[[ ]]`` pairs, and their names can
Sjoerd Meijer9a26a7e2017-10-13 14:02:36 +0000502be formed with the regex ``[a-zA-Z_][a-zA-Z0-9_]*``. If a colon follows the name,
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000503then it is a definition of the variable; otherwise, it is a use.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000504
Eli Bendersky4ca99ba2012-12-01 22:03:57 +0000505:program:`FileCheck` variables can be defined multiple times, and uses always
506get the latest value. Variables can also be used later on the same line they
507were defined on. For example:
508
509.. code-block:: llvm
510
511 ; CHECK: op [[REG:r[0-9]+]], [[REG]]
512
513Can be useful if you want the operands of ``op`` to be the same register,
514and don't care exactly which register it is.
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000515
Artem Belevichf55e72a2017-03-09 17:59:04 +0000516If ``--enable-var-scope`` is in effect, variables with names that
517start with ``$`` are considered to be global. All others variables are
518local. All local variables get undefined at the beginning of each
519CHECK-LABEL block. Global variables are not affected by CHECK-LABEL.
520This makes it easier to ensure that individual tests are not affected
521by variables set in preceding tests.
522
Alexander Kornienko92987fb2012-11-14 21:07:37 +0000523FileCheck Expressions
524~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
525
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +0000526Sometimes there's a need to verify output which refers line numbers of the
527match file, e.g. when testing compiler diagnostics. This introduces a certain
528fragility of the match file structure, as "``CHECK:``" lines contain absolute
529line numbers in the same file, which have to be updated whenever line numbers
530change due to text addition or deletion.
Alexander Kornienko92987fb2012-11-14 21:07:37 +0000531
532To support this case, FileCheck allows using ``[[@LINE]]``,
533``[[@LINE+<offset>]]``, ``[[@LINE-<offset>]]`` expressions in patterns. These
534expressions expand to a number of the line where a pattern is located (with an
535optional integer offset).
536
537This way match patterns can be put near the relevant test lines and include
538relative line number references, for example:
539
540.. code-block:: c++
541
542 // CHECK: test.cpp:[[@LINE+4]]:6: error: expected ';' after top level declarator
543 // CHECK-NEXT: {{^int a}}
544 // CHECK-NEXT: {{^ \^}}
545 // CHECK-NEXT: {{^ ;}}
546 int a
547
Wolfgang Pieb0b4509e2016-06-27 23:59:00 +0000548Matching Newline Characters
549~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
550
551To match newline characters in regular expressions the character class
552``[[:space:]]`` can be used. For example, the following pattern:
553
554.. code-block:: c++
555
556 // CHECK: DW_AT_location [DW_FORM_sec_offset] ([[DLOC:0x[0-9a-f]+]]){{[[:space:]].*}}"intd"
557
558matches output of the form (from llvm-dwarfdump):
559
Renato Golin124f2592016-07-20 12:16:38 +0000560.. code-block:: text
Wolfgang Pieb0b4509e2016-06-27 23:59:00 +0000561
562 DW_AT_location [DW_FORM_sec_offset] (0x00000233)
563 DW_AT_name [DW_FORM_strp] ( .debug_str[0x000000c9] = "intd")
564
565letting us set the :program:`FileCheck` variable ``DLOC`` to the desired value
566``0x00000233``, extracted from the line immediately preceding "``intd``".