blob: 830b1e00d4ea35e9ed7abf7294a25348dd16b2d9 [file] [log] [blame]
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +00001FileCheck - Flexible pattern matching file verifier
2===================================================
3
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +00004SYNOPSIS
5--------
6
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +00007:program:`FileCheck` *match-filename* [*--check-prefix=XXX*] [*--strict-whitespace*]
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +00008
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +00009DESCRIPTION
10-----------
11
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +000012:program:`FileCheck` reads two files (one from standard input, and one
13specified on the command line) and uses one to verify the other. This
14behavior is particularly useful for the testsuite, which wants to verify that
15the output of some tool (e.g. :program:`llc`) contains the expected information
16(for example, a movsd from esp or whatever is interesting). This is similar to
17using :program:`grep`, but it is optimized for matching multiple different
18inputs in one file in a specific order.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000019
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +000020The ``match-filename`` file specifies the file that contains the patterns to
Stephen Lina6e877f2013-07-14 18:12:25 +000021match. The file to verify is read from standard input unless the
22:option:`--input-file` option is used.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000023
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000024OPTIONS
25-------
26
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +000027.. option:: -help
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000028
29 Print a summary of command line options.
30
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +000031.. option:: --check-prefix prefix
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000032
Matt Arsenault13df4622013-11-10 02:04:09 +000033 FileCheck searches the contents of ``match-filename`` for patterns to
34 match. By default, these patterns are prefixed with "``CHECK:``".
35 If you'd like to use a different prefix (e.g. because the same input
36 file is checking multiple different tool or options), the
37 :option:`--check-prefix` argument allows you to specify one or more
38 prefixes to match. Multiple prefixes are useful for tests which might
39 change for different run options, but most lines remain the same.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000040
Daniel Sandersad875c22016-06-14 16:42:05 +000041.. option:: --check-prefixes prefix1,prefix2,...
42
43 An alias of :option:`--check-prefix` that allows multiple prefixes to be
44 specified as a comma separated list.
45
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +000046.. option:: --input-file filename
Eli Bendersky8a7e80f2012-11-07 01:41:30 +000047
48 File to check (defaults to stdin).
49
James Y Knight85913cc2016-02-11 16:46:09 +000050.. option:: --match-full-lines
51
52 By default, FileCheck allows matches of anywhere on a line. This
53 option will require all positive matches to cover an entire
54 line. Leading and trailing whitespace is ignored, unless
55 :option:`--strict-whitespace` is also specified. (Note: negative
56 matches from ``CHECK-NOT`` are not affected by this option!)
57
58 Passing this option is equivalent to inserting ``{{^ *}}`` or
59 ``{{^}}`` before, and ``{{ *$}}`` or ``{{$}}`` after every positive
60 check pattern.
61
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +000062.. option:: --strict-whitespace
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000063
64 By default, FileCheck canonicalizes input horizontal whitespace (spaces and
65 tabs) which causes it to ignore these differences (a space will match a tab).
Guy Benyei5ea04c32013-02-06 20:40:38 +000066 The :option:`--strict-whitespace` argument disables this behavior. End-of-line
Sean Silvab6bfbad2013-06-21 00:27:54 +000067 sequences are canonicalized to UNIX-style ``\n`` in all modes.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000068
Alexander Kornienko56ccdbb2014-07-11 12:39:32 +000069.. option:: --implicit-check-not check-pattern
70
71 Adds implicit negative checks for the specified patterns between positive
72 checks. The option allows writing stricter tests without stuffing them with
Dan Liewa762a132014-07-21 16:39:00 +000073 ``CHECK-NOT``\ s.
Alexander Kornienko56ccdbb2014-07-11 12:39:32 +000074
75 For example, "``--implicit-check-not warning:``" can be useful when testing
76 diagnostic messages from tools that don't have an option similar to ``clang
77 -verify``. With this option FileCheck will verify that input does not contain
78 warnings not covered by any ``CHECK:`` patterns.
79
George Karpenkov346dfbe2018-07-20 20:21:57 +000080.. option:: --dump-input-on-failure
81
82 When the check fails, dump all of the original input.
83
Artem Belevichf55e72a2017-03-09 17:59:04 +000084.. option:: --enable-var-scope
85
86 Enables scope for regex variables.
87
88 Variables with names that start with ``$`` are considered global and
89 remain set throughout the file.
90
91 All other variables get undefined after each encountered ``CHECK-LABEL``.
92
Alexander Richardson46e1fd62017-11-07 13:24:44 +000093.. option:: -D<VAR=VALUE>
94
95 Sets a filecheck variable ``VAR`` with value ``VALUE`` that can be used in
96 ``CHECK:`` lines.
97
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +000098.. option:: -version
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000099
100 Show the version number of this program.
101
Joel E. Dennydc5ba312018-07-13 03:08:23 +0000102.. option:: -v
103
104 Print directive pattern matches.
105
106.. option:: -vv
107
108 Print information helpful in diagnosing internal FileCheck issues, such as
109 discarded overlapping ``CHECK-DAG:`` matches, implicit EOF pattern matches,
110 and ``CHECK-NOT:`` patterns that do not have matches. Implies ``-v``.
111
Joel E. Dennybcf5b442018-07-11 20:27:27 +0000112.. option:: --allow-deprecated-dag-overlap
113
114 Enable overlapping among matches in a group of consecutive ``CHECK-DAG:``
115 directives. This option is deprecated and is only provided for convenience
116 as old tests are migrated to the new non-overlapping ``CHECK-DAG:``
117 implementation.
118
Joel E. Denny3e665092018-10-24 21:46:42 +0000119.. option:: --color
120
121 Use colors in output (autodetected by default).
122
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000123EXIT STATUS
124-----------
125
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +0000126If :program:`FileCheck` verifies that the file matches the expected contents,
127it exits with 0. Otherwise, if not, or if an error occurs, it will exit with a
128non-zero value.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000129
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000130TUTORIAL
131--------
132
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000133FileCheck is typically used from LLVM regression tests, being invoked on the RUN
134line of the test. A simple example of using FileCheck from a RUN line looks
135like this:
136
Dmitri Gribenkoa99fa5b2012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000137.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000138
139 ; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -march=x86-64 | FileCheck %s
140
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000141This syntax says to pipe the current file ("``%s``") into ``llvm-as``, pipe
142that into ``llc``, then pipe the output of ``llc`` into ``FileCheck``. This
143means that FileCheck will be verifying its standard input (the llc output)
144against the filename argument specified (the original ``.ll`` file specified by
145"``%s``"). To see how this works, let's look at the rest of the ``.ll`` file
146(after the RUN line):
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000147
Dmitri Gribenkoa99fa5b2012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000148.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000149
150 define void @sub1(i32* %p, i32 %v) {
151 entry:
152 ; CHECK: sub1:
153 ; CHECK: subl
154 %0 = tail call i32 @llvm.atomic.load.sub.i32.p0i32(i32* %p, i32 %v)
155 ret void
156 }
157
158 define void @inc4(i64* %p) {
159 entry:
160 ; CHECK: inc4:
161 ; CHECK: incq
162 %0 = tail call i64 @llvm.atomic.load.add.i64.p0i64(i64* %p, i64 1)
163 ret void
164 }
165
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000166Here you can see some "``CHECK:``" lines specified in comments. Now you can
167see how the file is piped into ``llvm-as``, then ``llc``, and the machine code
168output is what we are verifying. FileCheck checks the machine code output to
169verify that it matches what the "``CHECK:``" lines specify.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000170
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000171The syntax of the "``CHECK:``" lines is very simple: they are fixed strings that
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000172must occur in order. FileCheck defaults to ignoring horizontal whitespace
173differences (e.g. a space is allowed to match a tab) but otherwise, the contents
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000174of the "``CHECK:``" line is required to match some thing in the test file exactly.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000175
176One nice thing about FileCheck (compared to grep) is that it allows merging
177test cases together into logical groups. For example, because the test above
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000178is checking for the "``sub1:``" and "``inc4:``" labels, it will not match
179unless there is a "``subl``" in between those labels. If it existed somewhere
180else in the file, that would not count: "``grep subl``" matches if "``subl``"
181exists anywhere in the file.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000182
183The FileCheck -check-prefix option
184~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
185
Renato Golin124f2592016-07-20 12:16:38 +0000186The FileCheck `-check-prefix` option allows multiple test
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +0000187configurations to be driven from one `.ll` file. This is useful in many
188circumstances, for example, testing different architectural variants with
189:program:`llc`. Here's a simple example:
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000190
Dmitri Gribenkoa99fa5b2012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000191.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000192
193 ; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -mtriple=i686-apple-darwin9 -mattr=sse41 \
Dmitri Gribenko19408a72012-06-12 00:48:47 +0000194 ; RUN: | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=X32
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000195 ; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -mtriple=x86_64-apple-darwin9 -mattr=sse41 \
Dmitri Gribenko19408a72012-06-12 00:48:47 +0000196 ; RUN: | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=X64
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000197
198 define <4 x i32> @pinsrd_1(i32 %s, <4 x i32> %tmp) nounwind {
199 %tmp1 = insertelement <4 x i32>; %tmp, i32 %s, i32 1
200 ret <4 x i32> %tmp1
201 ; X32: pinsrd_1:
202 ; X32: pinsrd $1, 4(%esp), %xmm0
203
204 ; X64: pinsrd_1:
205 ; X64: pinsrd $1, %edi, %xmm0
206 }
207
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000208In this case, we're testing that we get the expected code generation with
209both 32-bit and 64-bit code generation.
210
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000211The "CHECK-NEXT:" directive
212~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
213
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000214Sometimes you want to match lines and would like to verify that matches
215happen on exactly consecutive lines with no other lines in between them. In
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000216this case, you can use "``CHECK:``" and "``CHECK-NEXT:``" directives to specify
217this. If you specified a custom check prefix, just use "``<PREFIX>-NEXT:``".
218For example, something like this works as you'd expect:
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000219
Dmitri Gribenkoa99fa5b2012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000220.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000221
Dmitri Gribenko19408a72012-06-12 00:48:47 +0000222 define void @t2(<2 x double>* %r, <2 x double>* %A, double %B) {
223 %tmp3 = load <2 x double>* %A, align 16
224 %tmp7 = insertelement <2 x double> undef, double %B, i32 0
225 %tmp9 = shufflevector <2 x double> %tmp3,
226 <2 x double> %tmp7,
227 <2 x i32> < i32 0, i32 2 >
228 store <2 x double> %tmp9, <2 x double>* %r, align 16
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000229 ret void
230
231 ; CHECK: t2:
232 ; CHECK: movl 8(%esp), %eax
233 ; CHECK-NEXT: movapd (%eax), %xmm0
234 ; CHECK-NEXT: movhpd 12(%esp), %xmm0
235 ; CHECK-NEXT: movl 4(%esp), %eax
236 ; CHECK-NEXT: movapd %xmm0, (%eax)
237 ; CHECK-NEXT: ret
238 }
239
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000240"``CHECK-NEXT:``" directives reject the input unless there is exactly one
Eli Bendersky2fef6b62012-11-21 22:40:52 +0000241newline between it and the previous directive. A "``CHECK-NEXT:``" cannot be
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000242the first directive in a file.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000243
Duncan P. N. Exon Smithcffbbe92015-03-05 17:00:05 +0000244The "CHECK-SAME:" directive
245~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
246
247Sometimes you want to match lines and would like to verify that matches happen
248on the same line as the previous match. In this case, you can use "``CHECK:``"
249and "``CHECK-SAME:``" directives to specify this. If you specified a custom
250check prefix, just use "``<PREFIX>-SAME:``".
251
252"``CHECK-SAME:``" is particularly powerful in conjunction with "``CHECK-NOT:``"
253(described below).
254
255For example, the following works like you'd expect:
256
257.. code-block:: llvm
258
Duncan P. N. Exon Smitha9308c42015-04-29 16:38:44 +0000259 !0 = !DILocation(line: 5, scope: !1, inlinedAt: !2)
Duncan P. N. Exon Smithcffbbe92015-03-05 17:00:05 +0000260
Duncan P. N. Exon Smitha9308c42015-04-29 16:38:44 +0000261 ; CHECK: !DILocation(line: 5,
Duncan P. N. Exon Smithcffbbe92015-03-05 17:00:05 +0000262 ; CHECK-NOT: column:
263 ; CHECK-SAME: scope: ![[SCOPE:[0-9]+]]
264
265"``CHECK-SAME:``" directives reject the input if there are any newlines between
266it and the previous directive. A "``CHECK-SAME:``" cannot be the first
267directive in a file.
268
James Henderson5507f662018-06-26 15:15:45 +0000269The "CHECK-EMPTY:" directive
James Hendersonc307b002018-06-26 15:29:09 +0000270~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
James Henderson5507f662018-06-26 15:15:45 +0000271
272If you need to check that the next line has nothing on it, not even whitespace,
273you can use the "``CHECK-EMPTY:``" directive.
274
275.. code-block:: llvm
276
Chandler Carruthef705b72018-08-06 01:41:25 +0000277 declare void @foo()
James Henderson5507f662018-06-26 15:15:45 +0000278
Chandler Carruthef705b72018-08-06 01:41:25 +0000279 declare void @bar()
James Henderson5507f662018-06-26 15:15:45 +0000280 ; CHECK: foo
281 ; CHECK-EMPTY:
282 ; CHECK-NEXT: bar
283
284Just like "``CHECK-NEXT:``" the directive will fail if there is more than one
285newline before it finds the next blank line, and it cannot be the first
286directive in a file.
287
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000288The "CHECK-NOT:" directive
289~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
290
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000291The "``CHECK-NOT:``" directive is used to verify that a string doesn't occur
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000292between two matches (or before the first match, or after the last match). For
293example, to verify that a load is removed by a transformation, a test like this
294can be used:
295
Dmitri Gribenkoa99fa5b2012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000296.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000297
298 define i8 @coerce_offset0(i32 %V, i32* %P) {
299 store i32 %V, i32* %P
300
301 %P2 = bitcast i32* %P to i8*
302 %P3 = getelementptr i8* %P2, i32 2
303
304 %A = load i8* %P3
305 ret i8 %A
306 ; CHECK: @coerce_offset0
307 ; CHECK-NOT: load
308 ; CHECK: ret i8
309 }
310
Michael Liao91a1b2c2013-05-14 20:34:12 +0000311The "CHECK-DAG:" directive
312~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
313
314If it's necessary to match strings that don't occur in a strictly sequential
315order, "``CHECK-DAG:``" could be used to verify them between two matches (or
316before the first match, or after the last match). For example, clang emits
317vtable globals in reverse order. Using ``CHECK-DAG:``, we can keep the checks
318in the natural order:
319
320.. code-block:: c++
321
322 // RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -emit-llvm -o - | FileCheck %s
323
324 struct Foo { virtual void method(); };
325 Foo f; // emit vtable
326 // CHECK-DAG: @_ZTV3Foo =
327
328 struct Bar { virtual void method(); };
329 Bar b;
330 // CHECK-DAG: @_ZTV3Bar =
331
Renato Golin58ab84a2013-10-11 18:50:22 +0000332``CHECK-NOT:`` directives could be mixed with ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives to
333exclude strings between the surrounding ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives. As a result,
334the surrounding ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives cannot be reordered, i.e. all
335occurrences matching ``CHECK-DAG:`` before ``CHECK-NOT:`` must not fall behind
336occurrences matching ``CHECK-DAG:`` after ``CHECK-NOT:``. For example,
337
338.. code-block:: llvm
339
340 ; CHECK-DAG: BEFORE
341 ; CHECK-NOT: NOT
342 ; CHECK-DAG: AFTER
343
344This case will reject input strings where ``BEFORE`` occurs after ``AFTER``.
Michael Liao91a1b2c2013-05-14 20:34:12 +0000345
346With captured variables, ``CHECK-DAG:`` is able to match valid topological
347orderings of a DAG with edges from the definition of a variable to its use.
348It's useful, e.g., when your test cases need to match different output
349sequences from the instruction scheduler. For example,
350
351.. code-block:: llvm
352
353 ; CHECK-DAG: add [[REG1:r[0-9]+]], r1, r2
354 ; CHECK-DAG: add [[REG2:r[0-9]+]], r3, r4
355 ; CHECK: mul r5, [[REG1]], [[REG2]]
356
357In this case, any order of that two ``add`` instructions will be allowed.
358
Renato Golin58ab84a2013-10-11 18:50:22 +0000359If you are defining `and` using variables in the same ``CHECK-DAG:`` block,
360be aware that the definition rule can match `after` its use.
361
362So, for instance, the code below will pass:
Michael Liao91a1b2c2013-05-14 20:34:12 +0000363
Renato Golin124f2592016-07-20 12:16:38 +0000364.. code-block:: text
Michael Liao91a1b2c2013-05-14 20:34:12 +0000365
Renato Golin58ab84a2013-10-11 18:50:22 +0000366 ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2:d[0-9]+]][0]
367 ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2]][1]
368 vmov.32 d0[1]
369 vmov.32 d0[0]
Michael Liao91a1b2c2013-05-14 20:34:12 +0000370
Renato Golin58ab84a2013-10-11 18:50:22 +0000371While this other code, will not:
372
Renato Golin124f2592016-07-20 12:16:38 +0000373.. code-block:: text
Renato Golin58ab84a2013-10-11 18:50:22 +0000374
375 ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2:d[0-9]+]][0]
376 ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2]][1]
377 vmov.32 d1[1]
378 vmov.32 d0[0]
379
380While this can be very useful, it's also dangerous, because in the case of
381register sequence, you must have a strong order (read before write, copy before
382use, etc). If the definition your test is looking for doesn't match (because
383of a bug in the compiler), it may match further away from the use, and mask
384real bugs away.
385
386In those cases, to enforce the order, use a non-DAG directive between DAG-blocks.
Michael Liao91a1b2c2013-05-14 20:34:12 +0000387
Joel E. Dennybcf5b442018-07-11 20:27:27 +0000388A ``CHECK-DAG:`` directive skips matches that overlap the matches of any
389preceding ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives in the same ``CHECK-DAG:`` block. Not only
390is this non-overlapping behavior consistent with other directives, but it's
391also necessary to handle sets of non-unique strings or patterns. For example,
392the following directives look for unordered log entries for two tasks in a
393parallel program, such as the OpenMP runtime:
394
395.. code-block:: text
396
397 // CHECK-DAG: [[THREAD_ID:[0-9]+]]: task_begin
398 // CHECK-DAG: [[THREAD_ID]]: task_end
399 //
400 // CHECK-DAG: [[THREAD_ID:[0-9]+]]: task_begin
401 // CHECK-DAG: [[THREAD_ID]]: task_end
402
403The second pair of directives is guaranteed not to match the same log entries
404as the first pair even though the patterns are identical and even if the text
405of the log entries is identical because the thread ID manages to be reused.
406
Stephen Linf8bd2e52013-07-12 14:51:05 +0000407The "CHECK-LABEL:" directive
Bill Wendlingc02da462013-07-30 08:26:24 +0000408~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Stephen Linf8bd2e52013-07-12 14:51:05 +0000409
410Sometimes in a file containing multiple tests divided into logical blocks, one
411or more ``CHECK:`` directives may inadvertently succeed by matching lines in a
412later block. While an error will usually eventually be generated, the check
413flagged as causing the error may not actually bear any relationship to the
414actual source of the problem.
415
416In order to produce better error messages in these cases, the "``CHECK-LABEL:``"
417directive can be used. It is treated identically to a normal ``CHECK``
Stephen Linb9464072013-07-18 23:26:58 +0000418directive except that FileCheck makes an additional assumption that a line
419matched by the directive cannot also be matched by any other check present in
420``match-filename``; this is intended to be used for lines containing labels or
421other unique identifiers. Conceptually, the presence of ``CHECK-LABEL`` divides
422the input stream into separate blocks, each of which is processed independently,
423preventing a ``CHECK:`` directive in one block matching a line in another block.
Artem Belevichf55e72a2017-03-09 17:59:04 +0000424If ``--enable-var-scope`` is in effect, all local variables are cleared at the
425beginning of the block.
426
Stephen Linb9464072013-07-18 23:26:58 +0000427For example,
Stephen Linf8bd2e52013-07-12 14:51:05 +0000428
429.. code-block:: llvm
430
431 define %struct.C* @C_ctor_base(%struct.C* %this, i32 %x) {
432 entry:
433 ; CHECK-LABEL: C_ctor_base:
434 ; CHECK: mov [[SAVETHIS:r[0-9]+]], r0
435 ; CHECK: bl A_ctor_base
436 ; CHECK: mov r0, [[SAVETHIS]]
437 %0 = bitcast %struct.C* %this to %struct.A*
438 %call = tail call %struct.A* @A_ctor_base(%struct.A* %0)
439 %1 = bitcast %struct.C* %this to %struct.B*
440 %call2 = tail call %struct.B* @B_ctor_base(%struct.B* %1, i32 %x)
441 ret %struct.C* %this
442 }
443
444 define %struct.D* @D_ctor_base(%struct.D* %this, i32 %x) {
445 entry:
446 ; CHECK-LABEL: D_ctor_base:
447
448The use of ``CHECK-LABEL:`` directives in this case ensures that the three
449``CHECK:`` directives only accept lines corresponding to the body of the
450``@C_ctor_base`` function, even if the patterns match lines found later in
Stephen Linb9464072013-07-18 23:26:58 +0000451the file. Furthermore, if one of these three ``CHECK:`` directives fail,
452FileCheck will recover by continuing to the next block, allowing multiple test
453failures to be detected in a single invocation.
Stephen Linf8bd2e52013-07-12 14:51:05 +0000454
455There is no requirement that ``CHECK-LABEL:`` directives contain strings that
456correspond to actual syntactic labels in a source or output language: they must
457simply uniquely match a single line in the file being verified.
458
459``CHECK-LABEL:`` directives cannot contain variable definitions or uses.
460
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000461FileCheck Pattern Matching Syntax
462~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
463
Paul Robinson282b3d32015-03-05 23:04:26 +0000464All FileCheck directives take a pattern to match.
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000465For most uses of FileCheck, fixed string matching is perfectly sufficient. For
466some things, a more flexible form of matching is desired. To support this,
467FileCheck allows you to specify regular expressions in matching strings,
Sjoerd Meijer9a26a7e2017-10-13 14:02:36 +0000468surrounded by double braces: ``{{yourregex}}``. FileCheck implements a POSIX
469regular expression matcher; it supports Extended POSIX regular expressions
470(ERE). Because we want to use fixed string matching for a majority of what we
471do, FileCheck has been designed to support mixing and matching fixed string
472matching with regular expressions. This allows you to write things like this:
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000473
Dmitri Gribenkoa99fa5b2012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000474.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000475
476 ; CHECK: movhpd {{[0-9]+}}(%esp), {{%xmm[0-7]}}
477
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000478In this case, any offset from the ESP register will be allowed, and any xmm
479register will be allowed.
480
481Because regular expressions are enclosed with double braces, they are
482visually distinct, and you don't need to use escape characters within the double
483braces like you would in C. In the rare case that you want to match double
484braces explicitly from the input, you can use something ugly like
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000485``{{[{][{]}}`` as your pattern.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000486
487FileCheck Variables
488~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
489
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000490It is often useful to match a pattern and then verify that it occurs again
491later in the file. For codegen tests, this can be useful to allow any register,
Eli Bendersky4ca99ba2012-12-01 22:03:57 +0000492but verify that that register is used consistently later. To do this,
493:program:`FileCheck` allows named variables to be defined and substituted into
494patterns. Here is a simple example:
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000495
Dmitri Gribenkoa99fa5b2012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000496.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000497
498 ; CHECK: test5:
499 ; CHECK: notw [[REGISTER:%[a-z]+]]
Chad Rosierfd7469c2012-05-24 21:17:47 +0000500 ; CHECK: andw {{.*}}[[REGISTER]]
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000501
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000502The first check line matches a regex ``%[a-z]+`` and captures it into the
503variable ``REGISTER``. The second line verifies that whatever is in
Eli Bendersky4ca99ba2012-12-01 22:03:57 +0000504``REGISTER`` occurs later in the file after an "``andw``". :program:`FileCheck`
505variable references are always contained in ``[[ ]]`` pairs, and their names can
Sjoerd Meijer9a26a7e2017-10-13 14:02:36 +0000506be formed with the regex ``[a-zA-Z_][a-zA-Z0-9_]*``. If a colon follows the name,
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000507then it is a definition of the variable; otherwise, it is a use.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000508
Eli Bendersky4ca99ba2012-12-01 22:03:57 +0000509:program:`FileCheck` variables can be defined multiple times, and uses always
510get the latest value. Variables can also be used later on the same line they
511were defined on. For example:
512
513.. code-block:: llvm
514
515 ; CHECK: op [[REG:r[0-9]+]], [[REG]]
516
517Can be useful if you want the operands of ``op`` to be the same register,
518and don't care exactly which register it is.
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000519
Artem Belevichf55e72a2017-03-09 17:59:04 +0000520If ``--enable-var-scope`` is in effect, variables with names that
521start with ``$`` are considered to be global. All others variables are
522local. All local variables get undefined at the beginning of each
523CHECK-LABEL block. Global variables are not affected by CHECK-LABEL.
524This makes it easier to ensure that individual tests are not affected
525by variables set in preceding tests.
526
Alexander Kornienko92987fb2012-11-14 21:07:37 +0000527FileCheck Expressions
528~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
529
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +0000530Sometimes there's a need to verify output which refers line numbers of the
531match file, e.g. when testing compiler diagnostics. This introduces a certain
532fragility of the match file structure, as "``CHECK:``" lines contain absolute
533line numbers in the same file, which have to be updated whenever line numbers
534change due to text addition or deletion.
Alexander Kornienko92987fb2012-11-14 21:07:37 +0000535
536To support this case, FileCheck allows using ``[[@LINE]]``,
537``[[@LINE+<offset>]]``, ``[[@LINE-<offset>]]`` expressions in patterns. These
538expressions expand to a number of the line where a pattern is located (with an
539optional integer offset).
540
541This way match patterns can be put near the relevant test lines and include
542relative line number references, for example:
543
544.. code-block:: c++
545
546 // CHECK: test.cpp:[[@LINE+4]]:6: error: expected ';' after top level declarator
547 // CHECK-NEXT: {{^int a}}
548 // CHECK-NEXT: {{^ \^}}
549 // CHECK-NEXT: {{^ ;}}
550 int a
551
Wolfgang Pieb0b4509e2016-06-27 23:59:00 +0000552Matching Newline Characters
553~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
554
555To match newline characters in regular expressions the character class
556``[[:space:]]`` can be used. For example, the following pattern:
557
558.. code-block:: c++
559
560 // CHECK: DW_AT_location [DW_FORM_sec_offset] ([[DLOC:0x[0-9a-f]+]]){{[[:space:]].*}}"intd"
561
562matches output of the form (from llvm-dwarfdump):
563
Renato Golin124f2592016-07-20 12:16:38 +0000564.. code-block:: text
Wolfgang Pieb0b4509e2016-06-27 23:59:00 +0000565
566 DW_AT_location [DW_FORM_sec_offset] (0x00000233)
567 DW_AT_name [DW_FORM_strp] ( .debug_str[0x000000c9] = "intd")
568
569letting us set the :program:`FileCheck` variable ``DLOC`` to the desired value
570``0x00000233``, extracted from the line immediately preceding "``intd``".