blob: 8c838518f6684505a9bae3181197b0e9a1e7c114 [file] [log] [blame]
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +00001FileCheck - Flexible pattern matching file verifier
2===================================================
3
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +00004SYNOPSIS
5--------
6
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +00007:program:`FileCheck` *match-filename* [*--check-prefix=XXX*] [*--strict-whitespace*]
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +00008
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +00009DESCRIPTION
10-----------
11
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +000012:program:`FileCheck` reads two files (one from standard input, and one
13specified on the command line) and uses one to verify the other. This
14behavior is particularly useful for the testsuite, which wants to verify that
15the output of some tool (e.g. :program:`llc`) contains the expected information
16(for example, a movsd from esp or whatever is interesting). This is similar to
17using :program:`grep`, but it is optimized for matching multiple different
18inputs in one file in a specific order.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000019
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +000020The ``match-filename`` file specifies the file that contains the patterns to
Stephen Lina6e877f2013-07-14 18:12:25 +000021match. The file to verify is read from standard input unless the
22:option:`--input-file` option is used.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000023
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000024OPTIONS
25-------
26
Joel E. Denny24994d72018-11-06 22:07:03 +000027Options are parsed from the environment variable ``FILECHECK_OPTS``
28and from the command line.
29
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +000030.. option:: -help
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000031
32 Print a summary of command line options.
33
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +000034.. option:: --check-prefix prefix
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000035
Matt Arsenault13df4622013-11-10 02:04:09 +000036 FileCheck searches the contents of ``match-filename`` for patterns to
37 match. By default, these patterns are prefixed with "``CHECK:``".
38 If you'd like to use a different prefix (e.g. because the same input
39 file is checking multiple different tool or options), the
40 :option:`--check-prefix` argument allows you to specify one or more
41 prefixes to match. Multiple prefixes are useful for tests which might
42 change for different run options, but most lines remain the same.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000043
Daniel Sandersad875c22016-06-14 16:42:05 +000044.. option:: --check-prefixes prefix1,prefix2,...
45
46 An alias of :option:`--check-prefix` that allows multiple prefixes to be
47 specified as a comma separated list.
48
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +000049.. option:: --input-file filename
Eli Bendersky8a7e80f2012-11-07 01:41:30 +000050
51 File to check (defaults to stdin).
52
James Y Knight85913cc2016-02-11 16:46:09 +000053.. option:: --match-full-lines
54
55 By default, FileCheck allows matches of anywhere on a line. This
56 option will require all positive matches to cover an entire
57 line. Leading and trailing whitespace is ignored, unless
58 :option:`--strict-whitespace` is also specified. (Note: negative
59 matches from ``CHECK-NOT`` are not affected by this option!)
60
61 Passing this option is equivalent to inserting ``{{^ *}}`` or
62 ``{{^}}`` before, and ``{{ *$}}`` or ``{{$}}`` after every positive
63 check pattern.
64
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +000065.. option:: --strict-whitespace
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000066
67 By default, FileCheck canonicalizes input horizontal whitespace (spaces and
68 tabs) which causes it to ignore these differences (a space will match a tab).
Guy Benyei5ea04c32013-02-06 20:40:38 +000069 The :option:`--strict-whitespace` argument disables this behavior. End-of-line
Sean Silvab6bfbad2013-06-21 00:27:54 +000070 sequences are canonicalized to UNIX-style ``\n`` in all modes.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000071
Alexander Kornienko56ccdbb2014-07-11 12:39:32 +000072.. option:: --implicit-check-not check-pattern
73
74 Adds implicit negative checks for the specified patterns between positive
75 checks. The option allows writing stricter tests without stuffing them with
Dan Liewa762a132014-07-21 16:39:00 +000076 ``CHECK-NOT``\ s.
Alexander Kornienko56ccdbb2014-07-11 12:39:32 +000077
78 For example, "``--implicit-check-not warning:``" can be useful when testing
79 diagnostic messages from tools that don't have an option similar to ``clang
80 -verify``. With this option FileCheck will verify that input does not contain
81 warnings not covered by any ``CHECK:`` patterns.
82
George Karpenkov346dfbe2018-07-20 20:21:57 +000083.. option:: --dump-input-on-failure
84
85 When the check fails, dump all of the original input.
86
Artem Belevichf55e72a2017-03-09 17:59:04 +000087.. option:: --enable-var-scope
88
89 Enables scope for regex variables.
90
91 Variables with names that start with ``$`` are considered global and
92 remain set throughout the file.
93
94 All other variables get undefined after each encountered ``CHECK-LABEL``.
95
Alexander Richardson46e1fd62017-11-07 13:24:44 +000096.. option:: -D<VAR=VALUE>
97
98 Sets a filecheck variable ``VAR`` with value ``VALUE`` that can be used in
99 ``CHECK:`` lines.
100
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +0000101.. option:: -version
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000102
103 Show the version number of this program.
104
Joel E. Dennydc5ba312018-07-13 03:08:23 +0000105.. option:: -v
106
107 Print directive pattern matches.
108
109.. option:: -vv
110
111 Print information helpful in diagnosing internal FileCheck issues, such as
112 discarded overlapping ``CHECK-DAG:`` matches, implicit EOF pattern matches,
113 and ``CHECK-NOT:`` patterns that do not have matches. Implies ``-v``.
114
Joel E. Dennybcf5b442018-07-11 20:27:27 +0000115.. option:: --allow-deprecated-dag-overlap
116
117 Enable overlapping among matches in a group of consecutive ``CHECK-DAG:``
118 directives. This option is deprecated and is only provided for convenience
119 as old tests are migrated to the new non-overlapping ``CHECK-DAG:``
120 implementation.
121
Joel E. Denny3e665092018-10-24 21:46:42 +0000122.. option:: --color
123
124 Use colors in output (autodetected by default).
125
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000126EXIT STATUS
127-----------
128
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +0000129If :program:`FileCheck` verifies that the file matches the expected contents,
130it exits with 0. Otherwise, if not, or if an error occurs, it will exit with a
131non-zero value.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000132
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000133TUTORIAL
134--------
135
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000136FileCheck is typically used from LLVM regression tests, being invoked on the RUN
137line of the test. A simple example of using FileCheck from a RUN line looks
138like this:
139
Dmitri Gribenkoa99fa5b2012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000140.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000141
142 ; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -march=x86-64 | FileCheck %s
143
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000144This syntax says to pipe the current file ("``%s``") into ``llvm-as``, pipe
145that into ``llc``, then pipe the output of ``llc`` into ``FileCheck``. This
146means that FileCheck will be verifying its standard input (the llc output)
147against the filename argument specified (the original ``.ll`` file specified by
148"``%s``"). To see how this works, let's look at the rest of the ``.ll`` file
149(after the RUN line):
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000150
Dmitri Gribenkoa99fa5b2012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000151.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000152
153 define void @sub1(i32* %p, i32 %v) {
154 entry:
155 ; CHECK: sub1:
156 ; CHECK: subl
157 %0 = tail call i32 @llvm.atomic.load.sub.i32.p0i32(i32* %p, i32 %v)
158 ret void
159 }
160
161 define void @inc4(i64* %p) {
162 entry:
163 ; CHECK: inc4:
164 ; CHECK: incq
165 %0 = tail call i64 @llvm.atomic.load.add.i64.p0i64(i64* %p, i64 1)
166 ret void
167 }
168
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000169Here you can see some "``CHECK:``" lines specified in comments. Now you can
170see how the file is piped into ``llvm-as``, then ``llc``, and the machine code
171output is what we are verifying. FileCheck checks the machine code output to
172verify that it matches what the "``CHECK:``" lines specify.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000173
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000174The syntax of the "``CHECK:``" lines is very simple: they are fixed strings that
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000175must occur in order. FileCheck defaults to ignoring horizontal whitespace
176differences (e.g. a space is allowed to match a tab) but otherwise, the contents
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000177of the "``CHECK:``" line is required to match some thing in the test file exactly.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000178
179One nice thing about FileCheck (compared to grep) is that it allows merging
180test cases together into logical groups. For example, because the test above
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000181is checking for the "``sub1:``" and "``inc4:``" labels, it will not match
182unless there is a "``subl``" in between those labels. If it existed somewhere
183else in the file, that would not count: "``grep subl``" matches if "``subl``"
184exists anywhere in the file.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000185
186The FileCheck -check-prefix option
187~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
188
Renato Golin124f2592016-07-20 12:16:38 +0000189The FileCheck `-check-prefix` option allows multiple test
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +0000190configurations to be driven from one `.ll` file. This is useful in many
191circumstances, for example, testing different architectural variants with
192:program:`llc`. Here's a simple example:
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000193
Dmitri Gribenkoa99fa5b2012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000194.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000195
196 ; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -mtriple=i686-apple-darwin9 -mattr=sse41 \
Dmitri Gribenko19408a72012-06-12 00:48:47 +0000197 ; RUN: | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=X32
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000198 ; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -mtriple=x86_64-apple-darwin9 -mattr=sse41 \
Dmitri Gribenko19408a72012-06-12 00:48:47 +0000199 ; RUN: | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=X64
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000200
201 define <4 x i32> @pinsrd_1(i32 %s, <4 x i32> %tmp) nounwind {
202 %tmp1 = insertelement <4 x i32>; %tmp, i32 %s, i32 1
203 ret <4 x i32> %tmp1
204 ; X32: pinsrd_1:
205 ; X32: pinsrd $1, 4(%esp), %xmm0
206
207 ; X64: pinsrd_1:
208 ; X64: pinsrd $1, %edi, %xmm0
209 }
210
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000211In this case, we're testing that we get the expected code generation with
212both 32-bit and 64-bit code generation.
213
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000214The "CHECK-NEXT:" directive
215~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
216
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000217Sometimes you want to match lines and would like to verify that matches
218happen on exactly consecutive lines with no other lines in between them. In
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000219this case, you can use "``CHECK:``" and "``CHECK-NEXT:``" directives to specify
220this. If you specified a custom check prefix, just use "``<PREFIX>-NEXT:``".
221For example, something like this works as you'd expect:
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000222
Dmitri Gribenkoa99fa5b2012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000223.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000224
Dmitri Gribenko19408a72012-06-12 00:48:47 +0000225 define void @t2(<2 x double>* %r, <2 x double>* %A, double %B) {
226 %tmp3 = load <2 x double>* %A, align 16
227 %tmp7 = insertelement <2 x double> undef, double %B, i32 0
228 %tmp9 = shufflevector <2 x double> %tmp3,
229 <2 x double> %tmp7,
230 <2 x i32> < i32 0, i32 2 >
231 store <2 x double> %tmp9, <2 x double>* %r, align 16
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000232 ret void
233
234 ; CHECK: t2:
235 ; CHECK: movl 8(%esp), %eax
236 ; CHECK-NEXT: movapd (%eax), %xmm0
237 ; CHECK-NEXT: movhpd 12(%esp), %xmm0
238 ; CHECK-NEXT: movl 4(%esp), %eax
239 ; CHECK-NEXT: movapd %xmm0, (%eax)
240 ; CHECK-NEXT: ret
241 }
242
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000243"``CHECK-NEXT:``" directives reject the input unless there is exactly one
Eli Bendersky2fef6b62012-11-21 22:40:52 +0000244newline between it and the previous directive. A "``CHECK-NEXT:``" cannot be
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000245the first directive in a file.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000246
Duncan P. N. Exon Smithcffbbe92015-03-05 17:00:05 +0000247The "CHECK-SAME:" directive
248~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
249
250Sometimes you want to match lines and would like to verify that matches happen
251on the same line as the previous match. In this case, you can use "``CHECK:``"
252and "``CHECK-SAME:``" directives to specify this. If you specified a custom
253check prefix, just use "``<PREFIX>-SAME:``".
254
255"``CHECK-SAME:``" is particularly powerful in conjunction with "``CHECK-NOT:``"
256(described below).
257
258For example, the following works like you'd expect:
259
260.. code-block:: llvm
261
Duncan P. N. Exon Smitha9308c42015-04-29 16:38:44 +0000262 !0 = !DILocation(line: 5, scope: !1, inlinedAt: !2)
Duncan P. N. Exon Smithcffbbe92015-03-05 17:00:05 +0000263
Duncan P. N. Exon Smitha9308c42015-04-29 16:38:44 +0000264 ; CHECK: !DILocation(line: 5,
Duncan P. N. Exon Smithcffbbe92015-03-05 17:00:05 +0000265 ; CHECK-NOT: column:
266 ; CHECK-SAME: scope: ![[SCOPE:[0-9]+]]
267
268"``CHECK-SAME:``" directives reject the input if there are any newlines between
269it and the previous directive. A "``CHECK-SAME:``" cannot be the first
270directive in a file.
271
James Henderson5507f662018-06-26 15:15:45 +0000272The "CHECK-EMPTY:" directive
James Hendersonc307b002018-06-26 15:29:09 +0000273~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
James Henderson5507f662018-06-26 15:15:45 +0000274
275If you need to check that the next line has nothing on it, not even whitespace,
276you can use the "``CHECK-EMPTY:``" directive.
277
278.. code-block:: llvm
279
Chandler Carruthef705b72018-08-06 01:41:25 +0000280 declare void @foo()
James Henderson5507f662018-06-26 15:15:45 +0000281
Chandler Carruthef705b72018-08-06 01:41:25 +0000282 declare void @bar()
James Henderson5507f662018-06-26 15:15:45 +0000283 ; CHECK: foo
284 ; CHECK-EMPTY:
285 ; CHECK-NEXT: bar
286
287Just like "``CHECK-NEXT:``" the directive will fail if there is more than one
288newline before it finds the next blank line, and it cannot be the first
289directive in a file.
290
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000291The "CHECK-NOT:" directive
292~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
293
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000294The "``CHECK-NOT:``" directive is used to verify that a string doesn't occur
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000295between two matches (or before the first match, or after the last match). For
296example, to verify that a load is removed by a transformation, a test like this
297can be used:
298
Dmitri Gribenkoa99fa5b2012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000299.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000300
301 define i8 @coerce_offset0(i32 %V, i32* %P) {
302 store i32 %V, i32* %P
303
304 %P2 = bitcast i32* %P to i8*
305 %P3 = getelementptr i8* %P2, i32 2
306
307 %A = load i8* %P3
308 ret i8 %A
309 ; CHECK: @coerce_offset0
310 ; CHECK-NOT: load
311 ; CHECK: ret i8
312 }
313
Fedor Sergeev6c9e19b2018-11-13 00:46:13 +0000314The "CHECK-COUNT:" directive
Fedor Sergeev5bf0c152018-11-13 01:12:19 +0000315~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Fedor Sergeev6c9e19b2018-11-13 00:46:13 +0000316
317If you need to match multiple lines with the same pattern over and over again
318you can repeat a plain ``CHECK:`` as many times as needed. If that looks too
319boring you can instead use a counted check "``CHECK-COUNT-<num>:``", where
320``<num>`` is a positive decimal number. It will match the pattern exactly
321``<num>`` times, no more and no less. If you specified a custom check prefix,
322just use "``<PREFIX>-COUNT-<num>:``" for the same effect.
323Here is a simple example:
324
325.. code-block:: llvm
326
327 Loop at depth 1
328 Loop at depth 1
329 Loop at depth 1
330 Loop at depth 1
331 Loop at depth 2
332 Loop at depth 3
333
334 ; CHECK-COUNT-6: Loop at depth {{[0-9]+}}
335 ; CHECK-NOT: Loop at depth {{[0-9]+}}
336
Michael Liao91a1b2c2013-05-14 20:34:12 +0000337The "CHECK-DAG:" directive
338~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
339
340If it's necessary to match strings that don't occur in a strictly sequential
341order, "``CHECK-DAG:``" could be used to verify them between two matches (or
342before the first match, or after the last match). For example, clang emits
343vtable globals in reverse order. Using ``CHECK-DAG:``, we can keep the checks
344in the natural order:
345
346.. code-block:: c++
347
348 // RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -emit-llvm -o - | FileCheck %s
349
350 struct Foo { virtual void method(); };
351 Foo f; // emit vtable
352 // CHECK-DAG: @_ZTV3Foo =
353
354 struct Bar { virtual void method(); };
355 Bar b;
356 // CHECK-DAG: @_ZTV3Bar =
357
Renato Golin58ab84a2013-10-11 18:50:22 +0000358``CHECK-NOT:`` directives could be mixed with ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives to
359exclude strings between the surrounding ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives. As a result,
360the surrounding ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives cannot be reordered, i.e. all
361occurrences matching ``CHECK-DAG:`` before ``CHECK-NOT:`` must not fall behind
362occurrences matching ``CHECK-DAG:`` after ``CHECK-NOT:``. For example,
363
364.. code-block:: llvm
365
366 ; CHECK-DAG: BEFORE
367 ; CHECK-NOT: NOT
368 ; CHECK-DAG: AFTER
369
370This case will reject input strings where ``BEFORE`` occurs after ``AFTER``.
Michael Liao91a1b2c2013-05-14 20:34:12 +0000371
372With captured variables, ``CHECK-DAG:`` is able to match valid topological
373orderings of a DAG with edges from the definition of a variable to its use.
374It's useful, e.g., when your test cases need to match different output
375sequences from the instruction scheduler. For example,
376
377.. code-block:: llvm
378
379 ; CHECK-DAG: add [[REG1:r[0-9]+]], r1, r2
380 ; CHECK-DAG: add [[REG2:r[0-9]+]], r3, r4
381 ; CHECK: mul r5, [[REG1]], [[REG2]]
382
383In this case, any order of that two ``add`` instructions will be allowed.
384
Renato Golin58ab84a2013-10-11 18:50:22 +0000385If you are defining `and` using variables in the same ``CHECK-DAG:`` block,
386be aware that the definition rule can match `after` its use.
387
388So, for instance, the code below will pass:
Michael Liao91a1b2c2013-05-14 20:34:12 +0000389
Renato Golin124f2592016-07-20 12:16:38 +0000390.. code-block:: text
Michael Liao91a1b2c2013-05-14 20:34:12 +0000391
Renato Golin58ab84a2013-10-11 18:50:22 +0000392 ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2:d[0-9]+]][0]
393 ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2]][1]
394 vmov.32 d0[1]
395 vmov.32 d0[0]
Michael Liao91a1b2c2013-05-14 20:34:12 +0000396
Renato Golin58ab84a2013-10-11 18:50:22 +0000397While this other code, will not:
398
Renato Golin124f2592016-07-20 12:16:38 +0000399.. code-block:: text
Renato Golin58ab84a2013-10-11 18:50:22 +0000400
401 ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2:d[0-9]+]][0]
402 ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2]][1]
403 vmov.32 d1[1]
404 vmov.32 d0[0]
405
406While this can be very useful, it's also dangerous, because in the case of
407register sequence, you must have a strong order (read before write, copy before
408use, etc). If the definition your test is looking for doesn't match (because
409of a bug in the compiler), it may match further away from the use, and mask
410real bugs away.
411
412In those cases, to enforce the order, use a non-DAG directive between DAG-blocks.
Michael Liao91a1b2c2013-05-14 20:34:12 +0000413
Joel E. Dennybcf5b442018-07-11 20:27:27 +0000414A ``CHECK-DAG:`` directive skips matches that overlap the matches of any
415preceding ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives in the same ``CHECK-DAG:`` block. Not only
416is this non-overlapping behavior consistent with other directives, but it's
417also necessary to handle sets of non-unique strings or patterns. For example,
418the following directives look for unordered log entries for two tasks in a
419parallel program, such as the OpenMP runtime:
420
421.. code-block:: text
422
423 // CHECK-DAG: [[THREAD_ID:[0-9]+]]: task_begin
424 // CHECK-DAG: [[THREAD_ID]]: task_end
425 //
426 // CHECK-DAG: [[THREAD_ID:[0-9]+]]: task_begin
427 // CHECK-DAG: [[THREAD_ID]]: task_end
428
429The second pair of directives is guaranteed not to match the same log entries
430as the first pair even though the patterns are identical and even if the text
431of the log entries is identical because the thread ID manages to be reused.
432
Stephen Linf8bd2e52013-07-12 14:51:05 +0000433The "CHECK-LABEL:" directive
Bill Wendlingc02da462013-07-30 08:26:24 +0000434~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Stephen Linf8bd2e52013-07-12 14:51:05 +0000435
436Sometimes in a file containing multiple tests divided into logical blocks, one
437or more ``CHECK:`` directives may inadvertently succeed by matching lines in a
438later block. While an error will usually eventually be generated, the check
439flagged as causing the error may not actually bear any relationship to the
440actual source of the problem.
441
442In order to produce better error messages in these cases, the "``CHECK-LABEL:``"
443directive can be used. It is treated identically to a normal ``CHECK``
Stephen Linb9464072013-07-18 23:26:58 +0000444directive except that FileCheck makes an additional assumption that a line
445matched by the directive cannot also be matched by any other check present in
446``match-filename``; this is intended to be used for lines containing labels or
447other unique identifiers. Conceptually, the presence of ``CHECK-LABEL`` divides
448the input stream into separate blocks, each of which is processed independently,
449preventing a ``CHECK:`` directive in one block matching a line in another block.
Artem Belevichf55e72a2017-03-09 17:59:04 +0000450If ``--enable-var-scope`` is in effect, all local variables are cleared at the
451beginning of the block.
452
Stephen Linb9464072013-07-18 23:26:58 +0000453For example,
Stephen Linf8bd2e52013-07-12 14:51:05 +0000454
455.. code-block:: llvm
456
457 define %struct.C* @C_ctor_base(%struct.C* %this, i32 %x) {
458 entry:
459 ; CHECK-LABEL: C_ctor_base:
460 ; CHECK: mov [[SAVETHIS:r[0-9]+]], r0
461 ; CHECK: bl A_ctor_base
462 ; CHECK: mov r0, [[SAVETHIS]]
463 %0 = bitcast %struct.C* %this to %struct.A*
464 %call = tail call %struct.A* @A_ctor_base(%struct.A* %0)
465 %1 = bitcast %struct.C* %this to %struct.B*
466 %call2 = tail call %struct.B* @B_ctor_base(%struct.B* %1, i32 %x)
467 ret %struct.C* %this
468 }
469
470 define %struct.D* @D_ctor_base(%struct.D* %this, i32 %x) {
471 entry:
472 ; CHECK-LABEL: D_ctor_base:
473
474The use of ``CHECK-LABEL:`` directives in this case ensures that the three
475``CHECK:`` directives only accept lines corresponding to the body of the
476``@C_ctor_base`` function, even if the patterns match lines found later in
Stephen Linb9464072013-07-18 23:26:58 +0000477the file. Furthermore, if one of these three ``CHECK:`` directives fail,
478FileCheck will recover by continuing to the next block, allowing multiple test
479failures to be detected in a single invocation.
Stephen Linf8bd2e52013-07-12 14:51:05 +0000480
481There is no requirement that ``CHECK-LABEL:`` directives contain strings that
482correspond to actual syntactic labels in a source or output language: they must
483simply uniquely match a single line in the file being verified.
484
485``CHECK-LABEL:`` directives cannot contain variable definitions or uses.
486
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000487FileCheck Pattern Matching Syntax
488~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
489
Paul Robinson282b3d32015-03-05 23:04:26 +0000490All FileCheck directives take a pattern to match.
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000491For most uses of FileCheck, fixed string matching is perfectly sufficient. For
492some things, a more flexible form of matching is desired. To support this,
493FileCheck allows you to specify regular expressions in matching strings,
Sjoerd Meijer9a26a7e2017-10-13 14:02:36 +0000494surrounded by double braces: ``{{yourregex}}``. FileCheck implements a POSIX
495regular expression matcher; it supports Extended POSIX regular expressions
496(ERE). Because we want to use fixed string matching for a majority of what we
497do, FileCheck has been designed to support mixing and matching fixed string
498matching with regular expressions. This allows you to write things like this:
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000499
Dmitri Gribenkoa99fa5b2012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000500.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000501
502 ; CHECK: movhpd {{[0-9]+}}(%esp), {{%xmm[0-7]}}
503
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000504In this case, any offset from the ESP register will be allowed, and any xmm
505register will be allowed.
506
507Because regular expressions are enclosed with double braces, they are
508visually distinct, and you don't need to use escape characters within the double
509braces like you would in C. In the rare case that you want to match double
510braces explicitly from the input, you can use something ugly like
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000511``{{[{][{]}}`` as your pattern.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000512
513FileCheck Variables
514~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
515
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000516It is often useful to match a pattern and then verify that it occurs again
517later in the file. For codegen tests, this can be useful to allow any register,
Eli Bendersky4ca99ba2012-12-01 22:03:57 +0000518but verify that that register is used consistently later. To do this,
519:program:`FileCheck` allows named variables to be defined and substituted into
520patterns. Here is a simple example:
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000521
Dmitri Gribenkoa99fa5b2012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000522.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000523
524 ; CHECK: test5:
525 ; CHECK: notw [[REGISTER:%[a-z]+]]
Chad Rosierfd7469c2012-05-24 21:17:47 +0000526 ; CHECK: andw {{.*}}[[REGISTER]]
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000527
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000528The first check line matches a regex ``%[a-z]+`` and captures it into the
529variable ``REGISTER``. The second line verifies that whatever is in
Eli Bendersky4ca99ba2012-12-01 22:03:57 +0000530``REGISTER`` occurs later in the file after an "``andw``". :program:`FileCheck`
531variable references are always contained in ``[[ ]]`` pairs, and their names can
Sjoerd Meijer9a26a7e2017-10-13 14:02:36 +0000532be formed with the regex ``[a-zA-Z_][a-zA-Z0-9_]*``. If a colon follows the name,
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000533then it is a definition of the variable; otherwise, it is a use.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000534
Eli Bendersky4ca99ba2012-12-01 22:03:57 +0000535:program:`FileCheck` variables can be defined multiple times, and uses always
536get the latest value. Variables can also be used later on the same line they
537were defined on. For example:
538
539.. code-block:: llvm
540
541 ; CHECK: op [[REG:r[0-9]+]], [[REG]]
542
543Can be useful if you want the operands of ``op`` to be the same register,
544and don't care exactly which register it is.
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000545
Artem Belevichf55e72a2017-03-09 17:59:04 +0000546If ``--enable-var-scope`` is in effect, variables with names that
547start with ``$`` are considered to be global. All others variables are
548local. All local variables get undefined at the beginning of each
549CHECK-LABEL block. Global variables are not affected by CHECK-LABEL.
550This makes it easier to ensure that individual tests are not affected
551by variables set in preceding tests.
552
Alexander Kornienko92987fb2012-11-14 21:07:37 +0000553FileCheck Expressions
554~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
555
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +0000556Sometimes there's a need to verify output which refers line numbers of the
557match file, e.g. when testing compiler diagnostics. This introduces a certain
558fragility of the match file structure, as "``CHECK:``" lines contain absolute
559line numbers in the same file, which have to be updated whenever line numbers
560change due to text addition or deletion.
Alexander Kornienko92987fb2012-11-14 21:07:37 +0000561
562To support this case, FileCheck allows using ``[[@LINE]]``,
563``[[@LINE+<offset>]]``, ``[[@LINE-<offset>]]`` expressions in patterns. These
564expressions expand to a number of the line where a pattern is located (with an
565optional integer offset).
566
567This way match patterns can be put near the relevant test lines and include
568relative line number references, for example:
569
570.. code-block:: c++
571
572 // CHECK: test.cpp:[[@LINE+4]]:6: error: expected ';' after top level declarator
573 // CHECK-NEXT: {{^int a}}
574 // CHECK-NEXT: {{^ \^}}
575 // CHECK-NEXT: {{^ ;}}
576 int a
577
Wolfgang Pieb0b4509e2016-06-27 23:59:00 +0000578Matching Newline Characters
579~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
580
581To match newline characters in regular expressions the character class
582``[[:space:]]`` can be used. For example, the following pattern:
583
584.. code-block:: c++
585
586 // CHECK: DW_AT_location [DW_FORM_sec_offset] ([[DLOC:0x[0-9a-f]+]]){{[[:space:]].*}}"intd"
587
588matches output of the form (from llvm-dwarfdump):
589
Renato Golin124f2592016-07-20 12:16:38 +0000590.. code-block:: text
Wolfgang Pieb0b4509e2016-06-27 23:59:00 +0000591
592 DW_AT_location [DW_FORM_sec_offset] (0x00000233)
593 DW_AT_name [DW_FORM_strp] ( .debug_str[0x000000c9] = "intd")
594
595letting us set the :program:`FileCheck` variable ``DLOC`` to the desired value
596``0x00000233``, extracted from the line immediately preceding "``intd``".