blob: 33d9fe8440450efb745c2f81403cff4c345d935e [file] [log] [blame]
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +00001FileCheck - Flexible pattern matching file verifier
2===================================================
3
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +00004SYNOPSIS
5--------
6
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +00007:program:`FileCheck` *match-filename* [*--check-prefix=XXX*] [*--strict-whitespace*]
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +00008
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +00009DESCRIPTION
10-----------
11
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +000012:program:`FileCheck` reads two files (one from standard input, and one
13specified on the command line) and uses one to verify the other. This
14behavior is particularly useful for the testsuite, which wants to verify that
15the output of some tool (e.g. :program:`llc`) contains the expected information
16(for example, a movsd from esp or whatever is interesting). This is similar to
17using :program:`grep`, but it is optimized for matching multiple different
18inputs in one file in a specific order.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000019
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +000020The ``match-filename`` file specifies the file that contains the patterns to
Stephen Lina6e877f2013-07-14 18:12:25 +000021match. The file to verify is read from standard input unless the
22:option:`--input-file` option is used.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000023
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000024OPTIONS
25-------
26
Joel E. Denny24994d72018-11-06 22:07:03 +000027Options are parsed from the environment variable ``FILECHECK_OPTS``
28and from the command line.
29
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +000030.. option:: -help
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000031
32 Print a summary of command line options.
33
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +000034.. option:: --check-prefix prefix
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000035
Matt Arsenault13df4622013-11-10 02:04:09 +000036 FileCheck searches the contents of ``match-filename`` for patterns to
37 match. By default, these patterns are prefixed with "``CHECK:``".
38 If you'd like to use a different prefix (e.g. because the same input
39 file is checking multiple different tool or options), the
40 :option:`--check-prefix` argument allows you to specify one or more
41 prefixes to match. Multiple prefixes are useful for tests which might
42 change for different run options, but most lines remain the same.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000043
Daniel Sandersad875c22016-06-14 16:42:05 +000044.. option:: --check-prefixes prefix1,prefix2,...
45
46 An alias of :option:`--check-prefix` that allows multiple prefixes to be
47 specified as a comma separated list.
48
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +000049.. option:: --input-file filename
Eli Bendersky8a7e80f2012-11-07 01:41:30 +000050
51 File to check (defaults to stdin).
52
James Y Knight85913cc2016-02-11 16:46:09 +000053.. option:: --match-full-lines
54
55 By default, FileCheck allows matches of anywhere on a line. This
56 option will require all positive matches to cover an entire
57 line. Leading and trailing whitespace is ignored, unless
58 :option:`--strict-whitespace` is also specified. (Note: negative
59 matches from ``CHECK-NOT`` are not affected by this option!)
60
61 Passing this option is equivalent to inserting ``{{^ *}}`` or
62 ``{{^}}`` before, and ``{{ *$}}`` or ``{{$}}`` after every positive
63 check pattern.
64
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +000065.. option:: --strict-whitespace
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000066
67 By default, FileCheck canonicalizes input horizontal whitespace (spaces and
68 tabs) which causes it to ignore these differences (a space will match a tab).
Guy Benyei5ea04c32013-02-06 20:40:38 +000069 The :option:`--strict-whitespace` argument disables this behavior. End-of-line
Sean Silvab6bfbad2013-06-21 00:27:54 +000070 sequences are canonicalized to UNIX-style ``\n`` in all modes.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +000071
Alexander Kornienko56ccdbb2014-07-11 12:39:32 +000072.. option:: --implicit-check-not check-pattern
73
74 Adds implicit negative checks for the specified patterns between positive
75 checks. The option allows writing stricter tests without stuffing them with
Dan Liewa762a132014-07-21 16:39:00 +000076 ``CHECK-NOT``\ s.
Alexander Kornienko56ccdbb2014-07-11 12:39:32 +000077
78 For example, "``--implicit-check-not warning:``" can be useful when testing
79 diagnostic messages from tools that don't have an option similar to ``clang
80 -verify``. With this option FileCheck will verify that input does not contain
81 warnings not covered by any ``CHECK:`` patterns.
82
Joel E. Denny3c5d2672018-12-18 00:01:39 +000083.. option:: --dump-input <mode>
84
85 Dump input to stderr, adding annotations representing currently enabled
86 diagnostics. Do this either 'always', on 'fail', or 'never'. Specify 'help'
87 to explain the dump format and quit.
88
George Karpenkov346dfbe2018-07-20 20:21:57 +000089.. option:: --dump-input-on-failure
90
Joel E. Denny3c5d2672018-12-18 00:01:39 +000091 When the check fails, dump all of the original input. This option is
92 deprecated in favor of `--dump-input=fail`.
George Karpenkov346dfbe2018-07-20 20:21:57 +000093
Artem Belevichf55e72a2017-03-09 17:59:04 +000094.. option:: --enable-var-scope
95
96 Enables scope for regex variables.
97
98 Variables with names that start with ``$`` are considered global and
99 remain set throughout the file.
100
101 All other variables get undefined after each encountered ``CHECK-LABEL``.
102
Alexander Richardson46e1fd62017-11-07 13:24:44 +0000103.. option:: -D<VAR=VALUE>
104
105 Sets a filecheck variable ``VAR`` with value ``VALUE`` that can be used in
106 ``CHECK:`` lines.
107
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +0000108.. option:: -version
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000109
110 Show the version number of this program.
111
Joel E. Dennydc5ba312018-07-13 03:08:23 +0000112.. option:: -v
113
Joel E. Denny352695c2019-01-22 21:41:42 +0000114 Print good directive pattern matches. However, if ``-input-dump=fail`` or
115 ``-input-dump=always``, add those matches as input annotations instead.
Joel E. Dennydc5ba312018-07-13 03:08:23 +0000116
117.. option:: -vv
118
119 Print information helpful in diagnosing internal FileCheck issues, such as
120 discarded overlapping ``CHECK-DAG:`` matches, implicit EOF pattern matches,
121 and ``CHECK-NOT:`` patterns that do not have matches. Implies ``-v``.
Joel E. Denny352695c2019-01-22 21:41:42 +0000122 However, if ``-input-dump=fail`` or ``-input-dump=always``, just add that
123 information as input annotations instead.
Joel E. Dennydc5ba312018-07-13 03:08:23 +0000124
Joel E. Dennybcf5b442018-07-11 20:27:27 +0000125.. option:: --allow-deprecated-dag-overlap
126
127 Enable overlapping among matches in a group of consecutive ``CHECK-DAG:``
128 directives. This option is deprecated and is only provided for convenience
129 as old tests are migrated to the new non-overlapping ``CHECK-DAG:``
130 implementation.
131
Joel E. Denny3e665092018-10-24 21:46:42 +0000132.. option:: --color
133
134 Use colors in output (autodetected by default).
135
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000136EXIT STATUS
137-----------
138
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +0000139If :program:`FileCheck` verifies that the file matches the expected contents,
140it exits with 0. Otherwise, if not, or if an error occurs, it will exit with a
141non-zero value.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000142
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000143TUTORIAL
144--------
145
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000146FileCheck is typically used from LLVM regression tests, being invoked on the RUN
147line of the test. A simple example of using FileCheck from a RUN line looks
148like this:
149
Dmitri Gribenkoa99fa5b2012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000150.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000151
152 ; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -march=x86-64 | FileCheck %s
153
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000154This syntax says to pipe the current file ("``%s``") into ``llvm-as``, pipe
155that into ``llc``, then pipe the output of ``llc`` into ``FileCheck``. This
156means that FileCheck will be verifying its standard input (the llc output)
157against the filename argument specified (the original ``.ll`` file specified by
158"``%s``"). To see how this works, let's look at the rest of the ``.ll`` file
159(after the RUN line):
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000160
Dmitri Gribenkoa99fa5b2012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000161.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000162
163 define void @sub1(i32* %p, i32 %v) {
164 entry:
165 ; CHECK: sub1:
166 ; CHECK: subl
167 %0 = tail call i32 @llvm.atomic.load.sub.i32.p0i32(i32* %p, i32 %v)
168 ret void
169 }
170
171 define void @inc4(i64* %p) {
172 entry:
173 ; CHECK: inc4:
174 ; CHECK: incq
175 %0 = tail call i64 @llvm.atomic.load.add.i64.p0i64(i64* %p, i64 1)
176 ret void
177 }
178
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000179Here you can see some "``CHECK:``" lines specified in comments. Now you can
180see how the file is piped into ``llvm-as``, then ``llc``, and the machine code
181output is what we are verifying. FileCheck checks the machine code output to
182verify that it matches what the "``CHECK:``" lines specify.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000183
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000184The syntax of the "``CHECK:``" lines is very simple: they are fixed strings that
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000185must occur in order. FileCheck defaults to ignoring horizontal whitespace
186differences (e.g. a space is allowed to match a tab) but otherwise, the contents
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000187of the "``CHECK:``" line is required to match some thing in the test file exactly.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000188
189One nice thing about FileCheck (compared to grep) is that it allows merging
190test cases together into logical groups. For example, because the test above
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000191is checking for the "``sub1:``" and "``inc4:``" labels, it will not match
192unless there is a "``subl``" in between those labels. If it existed somewhere
193else in the file, that would not count: "``grep subl``" matches if "``subl``"
194exists anywhere in the file.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000195
196The FileCheck -check-prefix option
197~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
198
Renato Golin124f2592016-07-20 12:16:38 +0000199The FileCheck `-check-prefix` option allows multiple test
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +0000200configurations to be driven from one `.ll` file. This is useful in many
201circumstances, for example, testing different architectural variants with
202:program:`llc`. Here's a simple example:
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000203
Dmitri Gribenkoa99fa5b2012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000204.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000205
206 ; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -mtriple=i686-apple-darwin9 -mattr=sse41 \
Dmitri Gribenko19408a72012-06-12 00:48:47 +0000207 ; RUN: | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=X32
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000208 ; RUN: llvm-as < %s | llc -mtriple=x86_64-apple-darwin9 -mattr=sse41 \
Dmitri Gribenko19408a72012-06-12 00:48:47 +0000209 ; RUN: | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=X64
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000210
211 define <4 x i32> @pinsrd_1(i32 %s, <4 x i32> %tmp) nounwind {
212 %tmp1 = insertelement <4 x i32>; %tmp, i32 %s, i32 1
213 ret <4 x i32> %tmp1
214 ; X32: pinsrd_1:
215 ; X32: pinsrd $1, 4(%esp), %xmm0
216
217 ; X64: pinsrd_1:
218 ; X64: pinsrd $1, %edi, %xmm0
219 }
220
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000221In this case, we're testing that we get the expected code generation with
222both 32-bit and 64-bit code generation.
223
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000224The "CHECK-NEXT:" directive
225~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
226
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000227Sometimes you want to match lines and would like to verify that matches
228happen on exactly consecutive lines with no other lines in between them. In
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000229this case, you can use "``CHECK:``" and "``CHECK-NEXT:``" directives to specify
230this. If you specified a custom check prefix, just use "``<PREFIX>-NEXT:``".
231For example, something like this works as you'd expect:
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000232
Dmitri Gribenkoa99fa5b2012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000233.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000234
Dmitri Gribenko19408a72012-06-12 00:48:47 +0000235 define void @t2(<2 x double>* %r, <2 x double>* %A, double %B) {
236 %tmp3 = load <2 x double>* %A, align 16
237 %tmp7 = insertelement <2 x double> undef, double %B, i32 0
238 %tmp9 = shufflevector <2 x double> %tmp3,
239 <2 x double> %tmp7,
240 <2 x i32> < i32 0, i32 2 >
241 store <2 x double> %tmp9, <2 x double>* %r, align 16
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000242 ret void
243
244 ; CHECK: t2:
245 ; CHECK: movl 8(%esp), %eax
246 ; CHECK-NEXT: movapd (%eax), %xmm0
247 ; CHECK-NEXT: movhpd 12(%esp), %xmm0
248 ; CHECK-NEXT: movl 4(%esp), %eax
249 ; CHECK-NEXT: movapd %xmm0, (%eax)
250 ; CHECK-NEXT: ret
251 }
252
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000253"``CHECK-NEXT:``" directives reject the input unless there is exactly one
Eli Bendersky2fef6b62012-11-21 22:40:52 +0000254newline between it and the previous directive. A "``CHECK-NEXT:``" cannot be
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000255the first directive in a file.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000256
Duncan P. N. Exon Smithcffbbe92015-03-05 17:00:05 +0000257The "CHECK-SAME:" directive
258~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
259
260Sometimes you want to match lines and would like to verify that matches happen
261on the same line as the previous match. In this case, you can use "``CHECK:``"
262and "``CHECK-SAME:``" directives to specify this. If you specified a custom
263check prefix, just use "``<PREFIX>-SAME:``".
264
265"``CHECK-SAME:``" is particularly powerful in conjunction with "``CHECK-NOT:``"
266(described below).
267
268For example, the following works like you'd expect:
269
270.. code-block:: llvm
271
Duncan P. N. Exon Smitha9308c42015-04-29 16:38:44 +0000272 !0 = !DILocation(line: 5, scope: !1, inlinedAt: !2)
Duncan P. N. Exon Smithcffbbe92015-03-05 17:00:05 +0000273
Duncan P. N. Exon Smitha9308c42015-04-29 16:38:44 +0000274 ; CHECK: !DILocation(line: 5,
Duncan P. N. Exon Smithcffbbe92015-03-05 17:00:05 +0000275 ; CHECK-NOT: column:
276 ; CHECK-SAME: scope: ![[SCOPE:[0-9]+]]
277
278"``CHECK-SAME:``" directives reject the input if there are any newlines between
279it and the previous directive. A "``CHECK-SAME:``" cannot be the first
280directive in a file.
281
James Henderson5507f662018-06-26 15:15:45 +0000282The "CHECK-EMPTY:" directive
James Hendersonc307b002018-06-26 15:29:09 +0000283~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
James Henderson5507f662018-06-26 15:15:45 +0000284
285If you need to check that the next line has nothing on it, not even whitespace,
286you can use the "``CHECK-EMPTY:``" directive.
287
288.. code-block:: llvm
289
Chandler Carruthef705b72018-08-06 01:41:25 +0000290 declare void @foo()
James Henderson5507f662018-06-26 15:15:45 +0000291
Chandler Carruthef705b72018-08-06 01:41:25 +0000292 declare void @bar()
James Henderson5507f662018-06-26 15:15:45 +0000293 ; CHECK: foo
294 ; CHECK-EMPTY:
295 ; CHECK-NEXT: bar
296
297Just like "``CHECK-NEXT:``" the directive will fail if there is more than one
298newline before it finds the next blank line, and it cannot be the first
299directive in a file.
300
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000301The "CHECK-NOT:" directive
302~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
303
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000304The "``CHECK-NOT:``" directive is used to verify that a string doesn't occur
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000305between two matches (or before the first match, or after the last match). For
306example, to verify that a load is removed by a transformation, a test like this
307can be used:
308
Dmitri Gribenkoa99fa5b2012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000309.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000310
311 define i8 @coerce_offset0(i32 %V, i32* %P) {
312 store i32 %V, i32* %P
313
314 %P2 = bitcast i32* %P to i8*
315 %P3 = getelementptr i8* %P2, i32 2
316
317 %A = load i8* %P3
318 ret i8 %A
319 ; CHECK: @coerce_offset0
320 ; CHECK-NOT: load
321 ; CHECK: ret i8
322 }
323
Fedor Sergeev6c9e19b2018-11-13 00:46:13 +0000324The "CHECK-COUNT:" directive
Fedor Sergeev5bf0c152018-11-13 01:12:19 +0000325~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Fedor Sergeev6c9e19b2018-11-13 00:46:13 +0000326
327If you need to match multiple lines with the same pattern over and over again
328you can repeat a plain ``CHECK:`` as many times as needed. If that looks too
329boring you can instead use a counted check "``CHECK-COUNT-<num>:``", where
330``<num>`` is a positive decimal number. It will match the pattern exactly
331``<num>`` times, no more and no less. If you specified a custom check prefix,
332just use "``<PREFIX>-COUNT-<num>:``" for the same effect.
333Here is a simple example:
334
Fedor Sergeev8b078122018-11-13 05:47:01 +0000335.. code-block:: text
Fedor Sergeev6c9e19b2018-11-13 00:46:13 +0000336
337 Loop at depth 1
338 Loop at depth 1
339 Loop at depth 1
340 Loop at depth 1
341 Loop at depth 2
342 Loop at depth 3
343
344 ; CHECK-COUNT-6: Loop at depth {{[0-9]+}}
345 ; CHECK-NOT: Loop at depth {{[0-9]+}}
346
Michael Liao91a1b2c2013-05-14 20:34:12 +0000347The "CHECK-DAG:" directive
348~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
349
350If it's necessary to match strings that don't occur in a strictly sequential
351order, "``CHECK-DAG:``" could be used to verify them between two matches (or
352before the first match, or after the last match). For example, clang emits
353vtable globals in reverse order. Using ``CHECK-DAG:``, we can keep the checks
354in the natural order:
355
356.. code-block:: c++
357
358 // RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -emit-llvm -o - | FileCheck %s
359
360 struct Foo { virtual void method(); };
361 Foo f; // emit vtable
362 // CHECK-DAG: @_ZTV3Foo =
363
364 struct Bar { virtual void method(); };
365 Bar b;
366 // CHECK-DAG: @_ZTV3Bar =
367
Renato Golin58ab84a2013-10-11 18:50:22 +0000368``CHECK-NOT:`` directives could be mixed with ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives to
369exclude strings between the surrounding ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives. As a result,
370the surrounding ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives cannot be reordered, i.e. all
371occurrences matching ``CHECK-DAG:`` before ``CHECK-NOT:`` must not fall behind
372occurrences matching ``CHECK-DAG:`` after ``CHECK-NOT:``. For example,
373
374.. code-block:: llvm
375
376 ; CHECK-DAG: BEFORE
377 ; CHECK-NOT: NOT
378 ; CHECK-DAG: AFTER
379
380This case will reject input strings where ``BEFORE`` occurs after ``AFTER``.
Michael Liao91a1b2c2013-05-14 20:34:12 +0000381
382With captured variables, ``CHECK-DAG:`` is able to match valid topological
383orderings of a DAG with edges from the definition of a variable to its use.
384It's useful, e.g., when your test cases need to match different output
385sequences from the instruction scheduler. For example,
386
387.. code-block:: llvm
388
389 ; CHECK-DAG: add [[REG1:r[0-9]+]], r1, r2
390 ; CHECK-DAG: add [[REG2:r[0-9]+]], r3, r4
391 ; CHECK: mul r5, [[REG1]], [[REG2]]
392
393In this case, any order of that two ``add`` instructions will be allowed.
394
Renato Golin58ab84a2013-10-11 18:50:22 +0000395If you are defining `and` using variables in the same ``CHECK-DAG:`` block,
396be aware that the definition rule can match `after` its use.
397
398So, for instance, the code below will pass:
Michael Liao91a1b2c2013-05-14 20:34:12 +0000399
Renato Golin124f2592016-07-20 12:16:38 +0000400.. code-block:: text
Michael Liao91a1b2c2013-05-14 20:34:12 +0000401
Renato Golin58ab84a2013-10-11 18:50:22 +0000402 ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2:d[0-9]+]][0]
403 ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2]][1]
404 vmov.32 d0[1]
405 vmov.32 d0[0]
Michael Liao91a1b2c2013-05-14 20:34:12 +0000406
Renato Golin58ab84a2013-10-11 18:50:22 +0000407While this other code, will not:
408
Renato Golin124f2592016-07-20 12:16:38 +0000409.. code-block:: text
Renato Golin58ab84a2013-10-11 18:50:22 +0000410
411 ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2:d[0-9]+]][0]
412 ; CHECK-DAG: vmov.32 [[REG2]][1]
413 vmov.32 d1[1]
414 vmov.32 d0[0]
415
416While this can be very useful, it's also dangerous, because in the case of
417register sequence, you must have a strong order (read before write, copy before
418use, etc). If the definition your test is looking for doesn't match (because
419of a bug in the compiler), it may match further away from the use, and mask
420real bugs away.
421
422In those cases, to enforce the order, use a non-DAG directive between DAG-blocks.
Michael Liao91a1b2c2013-05-14 20:34:12 +0000423
Joel E. Dennybcf5b442018-07-11 20:27:27 +0000424A ``CHECK-DAG:`` directive skips matches that overlap the matches of any
425preceding ``CHECK-DAG:`` directives in the same ``CHECK-DAG:`` block. Not only
426is this non-overlapping behavior consistent with other directives, but it's
427also necessary to handle sets of non-unique strings or patterns. For example,
428the following directives look for unordered log entries for two tasks in a
429parallel program, such as the OpenMP runtime:
430
431.. code-block:: text
432
433 // CHECK-DAG: [[THREAD_ID:[0-9]+]]: task_begin
434 // CHECK-DAG: [[THREAD_ID]]: task_end
435 //
436 // CHECK-DAG: [[THREAD_ID:[0-9]+]]: task_begin
437 // CHECK-DAG: [[THREAD_ID]]: task_end
438
439The second pair of directives is guaranteed not to match the same log entries
440as the first pair even though the patterns are identical and even if the text
441of the log entries is identical because the thread ID manages to be reused.
442
Stephen Linf8bd2e52013-07-12 14:51:05 +0000443The "CHECK-LABEL:" directive
Bill Wendlingc02da462013-07-30 08:26:24 +0000444~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Stephen Linf8bd2e52013-07-12 14:51:05 +0000445
446Sometimes in a file containing multiple tests divided into logical blocks, one
447or more ``CHECK:`` directives may inadvertently succeed by matching lines in a
448later block. While an error will usually eventually be generated, the check
449flagged as causing the error may not actually bear any relationship to the
450actual source of the problem.
451
452In order to produce better error messages in these cases, the "``CHECK-LABEL:``"
453directive can be used. It is treated identically to a normal ``CHECK``
Stephen Linb9464072013-07-18 23:26:58 +0000454directive except that FileCheck makes an additional assumption that a line
455matched by the directive cannot also be matched by any other check present in
456``match-filename``; this is intended to be used for lines containing labels or
457other unique identifiers. Conceptually, the presence of ``CHECK-LABEL`` divides
458the input stream into separate blocks, each of which is processed independently,
459preventing a ``CHECK:`` directive in one block matching a line in another block.
Artem Belevichf55e72a2017-03-09 17:59:04 +0000460If ``--enable-var-scope`` is in effect, all local variables are cleared at the
461beginning of the block.
462
Stephen Linb9464072013-07-18 23:26:58 +0000463For example,
Stephen Linf8bd2e52013-07-12 14:51:05 +0000464
465.. code-block:: llvm
466
467 define %struct.C* @C_ctor_base(%struct.C* %this, i32 %x) {
468 entry:
469 ; CHECK-LABEL: C_ctor_base:
470 ; CHECK: mov [[SAVETHIS:r[0-9]+]], r0
471 ; CHECK: bl A_ctor_base
472 ; CHECK: mov r0, [[SAVETHIS]]
473 %0 = bitcast %struct.C* %this to %struct.A*
474 %call = tail call %struct.A* @A_ctor_base(%struct.A* %0)
475 %1 = bitcast %struct.C* %this to %struct.B*
476 %call2 = tail call %struct.B* @B_ctor_base(%struct.B* %1, i32 %x)
477 ret %struct.C* %this
478 }
479
480 define %struct.D* @D_ctor_base(%struct.D* %this, i32 %x) {
481 entry:
482 ; CHECK-LABEL: D_ctor_base:
483
484The use of ``CHECK-LABEL:`` directives in this case ensures that the three
485``CHECK:`` directives only accept lines corresponding to the body of the
486``@C_ctor_base`` function, even if the patterns match lines found later in
Stephen Linb9464072013-07-18 23:26:58 +0000487the file. Furthermore, if one of these three ``CHECK:`` directives fail,
488FileCheck will recover by continuing to the next block, allowing multiple test
489failures to be detected in a single invocation.
Stephen Linf8bd2e52013-07-12 14:51:05 +0000490
491There is no requirement that ``CHECK-LABEL:`` directives contain strings that
492correspond to actual syntactic labels in a source or output language: they must
493simply uniquely match a single line in the file being verified.
494
495``CHECK-LABEL:`` directives cannot contain variable definitions or uses.
496
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000497FileCheck Pattern Matching Syntax
498~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
499
Paul Robinson282b3d32015-03-05 23:04:26 +0000500All FileCheck directives take a pattern to match.
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000501For most uses of FileCheck, fixed string matching is perfectly sufficient. For
502some things, a more flexible form of matching is desired. To support this,
503FileCheck allows you to specify regular expressions in matching strings,
Sjoerd Meijer9a26a7e2017-10-13 14:02:36 +0000504surrounded by double braces: ``{{yourregex}}``. FileCheck implements a POSIX
505regular expression matcher; it supports Extended POSIX regular expressions
506(ERE). Because we want to use fixed string matching for a majority of what we
507do, FileCheck has been designed to support mixing and matching fixed string
508matching with regular expressions. This allows you to write things like this:
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000509
Dmitri Gribenkoa99fa5b2012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000510.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000511
512 ; CHECK: movhpd {{[0-9]+}}(%esp), {{%xmm[0-7]}}
513
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000514In this case, any offset from the ESP register will be allowed, and any xmm
515register will be allowed.
516
517Because regular expressions are enclosed with double braces, they are
518visually distinct, and you don't need to use escape characters within the double
519braces like you would in C. In the rare case that you want to match double
520braces explicitly from the input, you can use something ugly like
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000521``{{[{][{]}}`` as your pattern.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000522
523FileCheck Variables
524~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
525
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000526It is often useful to match a pattern and then verify that it occurs again
527later in the file. For codegen tests, this can be useful to allow any register,
Eli Bendersky4ca99ba2012-12-01 22:03:57 +0000528but verify that that register is used consistently later. To do this,
529:program:`FileCheck` allows named variables to be defined and substituted into
530patterns. Here is a simple example:
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000531
Dmitri Gribenkoa99fa5b2012-06-12 15:45:07 +0000532.. code-block:: llvm
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000533
534 ; CHECK: test5:
535 ; CHECK: notw [[REGISTER:%[a-z]+]]
Chad Rosierfd7469c2012-05-24 21:17:47 +0000536 ; CHECK: andw {{.*}}[[REGISTER]]
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000537
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000538The first check line matches a regex ``%[a-z]+`` and captures it into the
539variable ``REGISTER``. The second line verifies that whatever is in
Eli Bendersky4ca99ba2012-12-01 22:03:57 +0000540``REGISTER`` occurs later in the file after an "``andw``". :program:`FileCheck`
541variable references are always contained in ``[[ ]]`` pairs, and their names can
Sjoerd Meijer9a26a7e2017-10-13 14:02:36 +0000542be formed with the regex ``[a-zA-Z_][a-zA-Z0-9_]*``. If a colon follows the name,
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000543then it is a definition of the variable; otherwise, it is a use.
Daniel Dunbar8f4a8a62012-05-08 16:50:35 +0000544
Eli Bendersky4ca99ba2012-12-01 22:03:57 +0000545:program:`FileCheck` variables can be defined multiple times, and uses always
546get the latest value. Variables can also be used later on the same line they
547were defined on. For example:
548
549.. code-block:: llvm
550
551 ; CHECK: op [[REG:r[0-9]+]], [[REG]]
552
553Can be useful if you want the operands of ``op`` to be the same register,
554and don't care exactly which register it is.
Dmitri Gribenkoa72e9f02012-11-14 19:42:32 +0000555
Artem Belevichf55e72a2017-03-09 17:59:04 +0000556If ``--enable-var-scope`` is in effect, variables with names that
557start with ``$`` are considered to be global. All others variables are
558local. All local variables get undefined at the beginning of each
559CHECK-LABEL block. Global variables are not affected by CHECK-LABEL.
560This makes it easier to ensure that individual tests are not affected
561by variables set in preceding tests.
562
Alexander Kornienko92987fb2012-11-14 21:07:37 +0000563FileCheck Expressions
564~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
565
Dmitri Gribenkof589e242012-11-29 19:21:02 +0000566Sometimes there's a need to verify output which refers line numbers of the
567match file, e.g. when testing compiler diagnostics. This introduces a certain
568fragility of the match file structure, as "``CHECK:``" lines contain absolute
569line numbers in the same file, which have to be updated whenever line numbers
570change due to text addition or deletion.
Alexander Kornienko92987fb2012-11-14 21:07:37 +0000571
572To support this case, FileCheck allows using ``[[@LINE]]``,
573``[[@LINE+<offset>]]``, ``[[@LINE-<offset>]]`` expressions in patterns. These
574expressions expand to a number of the line where a pattern is located (with an
575optional integer offset).
576
577This way match patterns can be put near the relevant test lines and include
578relative line number references, for example:
579
580.. code-block:: c++
581
582 // CHECK: test.cpp:[[@LINE+4]]:6: error: expected ';' after top level declarator
583 // CHECK-NEXT: {{^int a}}
584 // CHECK-NEXT: {{^ \^}}
585 // CHECK-NEXT: {{^ ;}}
586 int a
587
Wolfgang Pieb0b4509e2016-06-27 23:59:00 +0000588Matching Newline Characters
589~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
590
591To match newline characters in regular expressions the character class
592``[[:space:]]`` can be used. For example, the following pattern:
593
594.. code-block:: c++
595
596 // CHECK: DW_AT_location [DW_FORM_sec_offset] ([[DLOC:0x[0-9a-f]+]]){{[[:space:]].*}}"intd"
597
598matches output of the form (from llvm-dwarfdump):
599
Renato Golin124f2592016-07-20 12:16:38 +0000600.. code-block:: text
Wolfgang Pieb0b4509e2016-06-27 23:59:00 +0000601
602 DW_AT_location [DW_FORM_sec_offset] (0x00000233)
603 DW_AT_name [DW_FORM_strp] ( .debug_str[0x000000c9] = "intd")
604
605letting us set the :program:`FileCheck` variable ``DLOC`` to the desired value
606``0x00000233``, extracted from the line immediately preceding "``intd``".